Differentiation in the Classroom
What it is and is not.
Differentiation
Write down what you immediately think of when you hear the term “differentiation”
Objectives
● We Are Learning to:
– Evaluate the use of
differentiation
strategies for use in
our own classrooms
● What I'm looking For:
– All: observe instances
where we already
differentiate in our
classroom.
– Most: Create a
differentiated resource
for use in a lesson next
week.
– Some: Evaluate the
Lecture Outline
● What is Differentiation (5 mins)
● Outcomes Objectives and Backwards Mapping (10
mins)
● Differentiation by Outcome (5 mins)
● Differentiation by Support (5 mins)
● Differentiation by Task (5 mins)
● Plan your lesson (20 mins)
● Share understanding (5 mins)
What is Differentiation
● Differentiation, is the process by which differences between
pupils are accommodated so that all students have the best
possible chance of learning.
– UK Training and Development Agency
● Differentiation is providing different learning experiences for
different groups of students in your classroom.
● Differentiation comes in many forms.
● Differentiation takes deliberate planning if it is to be really
effective.
● Differentiation is a way to give your students an opportunity to
achieve learning.
What Differentiation is Not.
● Differentiation is not providing a individualised curriculum.
● Differentiation is not a way to do without teaching
assistants.
● Differentiation is not missing out the unimportant bits of
the syllabus.
● Differentiation may not make your stubborn students
learn.
● Differentiation is not just for the less able students.
Types of Differentiation
● There are three broad types of differentiation that
can be used in the day to day classroom.
– Differentiation by outcome
– Differentiation by support
– Differentiation by task
● All types of differentiation require the teacher to
have deliberate, well formed learning objectives
and outcomes
Increasing
teacher
planning
Increasing
student
outcomes
Increasing
teacher
management
Objectives versus Outcomes
● These two terms are often misunderstood.
– A lesson (or learning) objective is “what” you are
wanting the students to learn.
● Based on syllabus requirements.
– A learning outcome is “how” students know that
they have achieved the objective.
● Based on things the student can “do”
Objectives
● Lesson objectives
– Indicate the depth of learning
– Give students confidence that they can participate
in the learning.
– Present challenging learning to students
– Engage students in what is going to happen
– Motivate students by giving them an “I can do it
feeling”
Objectives
●
Objectives should be able to be written in student speak( not
Eduspeak!)
●
Often it is good to try to write objectives that start:
“We Are Learning To ...” (WALT)
– e.g. We Are Learning To explain how sound waves travel.
– e.g. We Are Learning To understand how Shakespeare uses irony.
– e.g. We Are Learning To create a missing song from Frozen
●
If you have written the objective, then SHARE the objective at the
beginning of every lesson with your students.
Outcomes
● Outcomes indicate what students should be able
to do at the end of the learning.
● Outcomes are often written in the form:
● What I'm Looking For (WILF):
– e.g. Students who can identify that sound waves need
particles.
– e.g. Students who can compare the use of irony by
Shakespeare and modern comedians
– e.g. Students who can collaborate to produce a song.
Outcomes
● Outcomes can often be
written using verbs
from Bloom's
taxonomy.
● Often the tendency is
to choose verbs from
the lower levels of
thinking.
– Consider using verbs
from different levels to
indicate to students
what is required.
Backwards Mapping
● Backwards Mapping
is the process of
planning lessons from
outcomes rather than
towards outcomes.
● It is an essential
process in ensuring
that differentiation is
actually useful for
students.
Objectives
Outcomes
All:
Most:
Some:
Activities
Resources
Big Ideas / Topics
Stage1Stage2Stage3
Differentiation by Outcome
● This is the easiest to implement, but the hardest to
manage.
● All students are given the same, often open
ended, task.
● Students are invited to show achievement at one
of a number of levels (usually 3)
– This technique is generally not seen as best practice.
– But, with tightly controlled success criteria it can be
very effective.
Differentiation by Outcome
● Try to write just 1 or 2 learning objectives for a
lesson
● Try to write your outcomes at three different
levels
– All: this is what students MUST be able to do
– Most: this is what students SHOULD be able to do
– Some: this is what you WOULD like students to do
What might this differentiation
look like?
● Lesson objective and outcomes are shared with the
class at the beginning and clarified if needed.
● Outcomes are referred to throughout the lesson
● Students are encouraged to complete the task at the all
level, then the most,then the some.
– Students are actively engaged with trying to achieve the next
level outcome
● Lesson objective and outcomes are re-visited at the end
of the lesson and students self-assess their learning
against outcomes.
Differentiation by Support
● This requires pre-planning and a good knowledge of your
students and their capabilities.
● There are many ways to provide “support” to your students.
– You can provide different texts (resources) for different groups.
– You can use organised group structures.
– You can work with one group while other groups work
independently.
– You can use Teaching Assistants.
Differentiation by Support -
Text
● Provide a range of resources for your students
to use:
– Textbooks at different reading levels
● Made easier with systems like LearningField
– Videos and animations at different levels
● Search YouTube etc.
– Real-world resources vs school resources
● Foreign language newspapers/magazines/books vs
formulaic school texts.
Differentiation by Support -
Grouping
● Group students by various methods:
– Could group by ability
● Often used for differentiation by outcome tasks, or for providing targeted
teacher support.
– Could group by personality
● Often used when needing to get students to develop specific team roles.
– Could group by mixed ability
● Often used so that the more able teach the less able and bring them up
– Could group by ability then mix.
● Often used for “expert” groups: groups of students of similar ability become
experts in part of a problem. The groups are then mixed and the experts
have to teach the remained of the new group.
Differentiation by Support –
Direct Support
● Either as the teacher or using a Teaching Assistant
– Generally requires grouping of some form.
– The teacher / TA works with a small group while the rest of
the class works independently on the task.
– Can be very effective to move the top on or bring the
bottom up.
– Needs to be deliberate and not ad-hoc.
– Must avoid over-supporting the group
● Ask open ended questions,
● Answer questions with questions
● Walk away
What might this differentiation
look like?
● Lesson objective is shared with the class at the beginning
and clarified if needed.
● Students are grouped as needed and given the same
core material.
● Students use the materials to construct their own
knowledge and share it with each other.
– High level of collaboration
● Teacher (and TA) move around the room supporting
groups (and individuals) and facilitating learning.
Differentiation by Task
● This requires the most pre-planning
– The teacher produces multiple tasks (usually 3)
which are used to teach the same learning objective
at differing levels of challenge.
– There are a few ways to do this:
● Graduation
● Negotiation
● Resource
Differentiation by Task -
Graduation
● The teacher chooses their lesson outcome so that they
form a sequence of learning.
– At each level the knowledge gets deeper or the skills get more
advanced.
● The teacher develops similar resources that target each
level of outcome
● The resources are then merged to form a single large
resource.
● Students start at the beginning and the resource
naturally gets more advanced as they progress.
Differentiation by Task -
Graduation
● Sometimes advanced students can be told to start
at question X
– This assumes they already have the basic
understanding developed by Questions 1 to (X-1)
● Students are set the challenge of see how far they
can get in a fixed time.
– Could be directly related to WILFs
● Commonly seen in maths, and science, and in
text book end of chapter questions.
Differentiation by Task -
Resource
● The teacher chooses their lesson outcomes so
that they achieve the objective at different levels.
● The teacher then develops a resource that targets
the middle level outcome.
● The teacher then modifies this resource up and
down to achieve the upper and lower outcome.
● Students are given the appropriate resource for
their learning by the teacher
Differentiation by Task -
Resource
● This requires very careful planning to avoid
stigmatising students.
● There needs to be the option for students to ask
for the next resource up
– Therefore this should not be overly covert
● If covert is necessary, then a 2 level resource
system is preferable.
– Resources can be dealt from the top or bottom of the
pile without the need for further clarification.
Differentiation by Task -
Negotiation
● The teacher plans a sequence of lessons for a
given period of time (e.g. 2 weeks)
– For each “lesson” the teacher produces a particular
resource.
– The resources get gradually more challenging
throughout the sequence.
– It is possible to have a number of strands of
resources in the sequence with each strand having
its own progression
Differentiation by Task -
Negotiation
● The students work through the sequence of lessons at their own pace.
● They are given deadlines such as:
– By the end of lesson 2 all of you should have done worksheet 1 & 2 and some of
you might have finished worksheet 4.
● The sequence MUST be designed so that all students are able to
achieve the minimum standard by the end of the allocated time.
● It may be desirable to plan the sequence like a corkscrew:
– Revisiting ideas at gradually increasing complexities.
Your Task
● Think of a lesson that you are going to deliver to a class in
the next fortnight.
– Develop a suitable learning objective
– Identify suitable learning outcomes for the class
● What activities might you use to deliver that lesson?
● How might you differentiate the lesson for your class?
● Develop a suitable differentiated resource to deliver your
lesson. (20 mins)
Objectives
● We Are Learning to:
– Evaluate the use of
differentiation
strategies for use in
our own classrooms
● What I'm looking For:
– All: observe instances
where we already
differentiate in our
classroom.
– Most: Create a
differentiated resource
for use in a lesson next
week.
– Some: Evaluate the

Differentiation in the classroom.

  • 1.
    Differentiation in theClassroom What it is and is not.
  • 2.
    Differentiation Write down whatyou immediately think of when you hear the term “differentiation”
  • 3.
    Objectives ● We AreLearning to: – Evaluate the use of differentiation strategies for use in our own classrooms ● What I'm looking For: – All: observe instances where we already differentiate in our classroom. – Most: Create a differentiated resource for use in a lesson next week. – Some: Evaluate the
  • 4.
    Lecture Outline ● Whatis Differentiation (5 mins) ● Outcomes Objectives and Backwards Mapping (10 mins) ● Differentiation by Outcome (5 mins) ● Differentiation by Support (5 mins) ● Differentiation by Task (5 mins) ● Plan your lesson (20 mins) ● Share understanding (5 mins)
  • 5.
    What is Differentiation ●Differentiation, is the process by which differences between pupils are accommodated so that all students have the best possible chance of learning. – UK Training and Development Agency ● Differentiation is providing different learning experiences for different groups of students in your classroom. ● Differentiation comes in many forms. ● Differentiation takes deliberate planning if it is to be really effective. ● Differentiation is a way to give your students an opportunity to achieve learning.
  • 6.
    What Differentiation isNot. ● Differentiation is not providing a individualised curriculum. ● Differentiation is not a way to do without teaching assistants. ● Differentiation is not missing out the unimportant bits of the syllabus. ● Differentiation may not make your stubborn students learn. ● Differentiation is not just for the less able students.
  • 7.
    Types of Differentiation ●There are three broad types of differentiation that can be used in the day to day classroom. – Differentiation by outcome – Differentiation by support – Differentiation by task ● All types of differentiation require the teacher to have deliberate, well formed learning objectives and outcomes Increasing teacher planning Increasing student outcomes Increasing teacher management
  • 8.
    Objectives versus Outcomes ●These two terms are often misunderstood. – A lesson (or learning) objective is “what” you are wanting the students to learn. ● Based on syllabus requirements. – A learning outcome is “how” students know that they have achieved the objective. ● Based on things the student can “do”
  • 9.
    Objectives ● Lesson objectives –Indicate the depth of learning – Give students confidence that they can participate in the learning. – Present challenging learning to students – Engage students in what is going to happen – Motivate students by giving them an “I can do it feeling”
  • 10.
    Objectives ● Objectives should beable to be written in student speak( not Eduspeak!) ● Often it is good to try to write objectives that start: “We Are Learning To ...” (WALT) – e.g. We Are Learning To explain how sound waves travel. – e.g. We Are Learning To understand how Shakespeare uses irony. – e.g. We Are Learning To create a missing song from Frozen ● If you have written the objective, then SHARE the objective at the beginning of every lesson with your students.
  • 11.
    Outcomes ● Outcomes indicatewhat students should be able to do at the end of the learning. ● Outcomes are often written in the form: ● What I'm Looking For (WILF): – e.g. Students who can identify that sound waves need particles. – e.g. Students who can compare the use of irony by Shakespeare and modern comedians – e.g. Students who can collaborate to produce a song.
  • 12.
    Outcomes ● Outcomes canoften be written using verbs from Bloom's taxonomy. ● Often the tendency is to choose verbs from the lower levels of thinking. – Consider using verbs from different levels to indicate to students what is required.
  • 13.
    Backwards Mapping ● BackwardsMapping is the process of planning lessons from outcomes rather than towards outcomes. ● It is an essential process in ensuring that differentiation is actually useful for students. Objectives Outcomes All: Most: Some: Activities Resources Big Ideas / Topics Stage1Stage2Stage3
  • 14.
    Differentiation by Outcome ●This is the easiest to implement, but the hardest to manage. ● All students are given the same, often open ended, task. ● Students are invited to show achievement at one of a number of levels (usually 3) – This technique is generally not seen as best practice. – But, with tightly controlled success criteria it can be very effective.
  • 15.
    Differentiation by Outcome ●Try to write just 1 or 2 learning objectives for a lesson ● Try to write your outcomes at three different levels – All: this is what students MUST be able to do – Most: this is what students SHOULD be able to do – Some: this is what you WOULD like students to do
  • 16.
    What might thisdifferentiation look like? ● Lesson objective and outcomes are shared with the class at the beginning and clarified if needed. ● Outcomes are referred to throughout the lesson ● Students are encouraged to complete the task at the all level, then the most,then the some. – Students are actively engaged with trying to achieve the next level outcome ● Lesson objective and outcomes are re-visited at the end of the lesson and students self-assess their learning against outcomes.
  • 17.
    Differentiation by Support ●This requires pre-planning and a good knowledge of your students and their capabilities. ● There are many ways to provide “support” to your students. – You can provide different texts (resources) for different groups. – You can use organised group structures. – You can work with one group while other groups work independently. – You can use Teaching Assistants.
  • 18.
    Differentiation by Support- Text ● Provide a range of resources for your students to use: – Textbooks at different reading levels ● Made easier with systems like LearningField – Videos and animations at different levels ● Search YouTube etc. – Real-world resources vs school resources ● Foreign language newspapers/magazines/books vs formulaic school texts.
  • 19.
    Differentiation by Support- Grouping ● Group students by various methods: – Could group by ability ● Often used for differentiation by outcome tasks, or for providing targeted teacher support. – Could group by personality ● Often used when needing to get students to develop specific team roles. – Could group by mixed ability ● Often used so that the more able teach the less able and bring them up – Could group by ability then mix. ● Often used for “expert” groups: groups of students of similar ability become experts in part of a problem. The groups are then mixed and the experts have to teach the remained of the new group.
  • 20.
    Differentiation by Support– Direct Support ● Either as the teacher or using a Teaching Assistant – Generally requires grouping of some form. – The teacher / TA works with a small group while the rest of the class works independently on the task. – Can be very effective to move the top on or bring the bottom up. – Needs to be deliberate and not ad-hoc. – Must avoid over-supporting the group ● Ask open ended questions, ● Answer questions with questions ● Walk away
  • 21.
    What might thisdifferentiation look like? ● Lesson objective is shared with the class at the beginning and clarified if needed. ● Students are grouped as needed and given the same core material. ● Students use the materials to construct their own knowledge and share it with each other. – High level of collaboration ● Teacher (and TA) move around the room supporting groups (and individuals) and facilitating learning.
  • 22.
    Differentiation by Task ●This requires the most pre-planning – The teacher produces multiple tasks (usually 3) which are used to teach the same learning objective at differing levels of challenge. – There are a few ways to do this: ● Graduation ● Negotiation ● Resource
  • 23.
    Differentiation by Task- Graduation ● The teacher chooses their lesson outcome so that they form a sequence of learning. – At each level the knowledge gets deeper or the skills get more advanced. ● The teacher develops similar resources that target each level of outcome ● The resources are then merged to form a single large resource. ● Students start at the beginning and the resource naturally gets more advanced as they progress.
  • 24.
    Differentiation by Task- Graduation ● Sometimes advanced students can be told to start at question X – This assumes they already have the basic understanding developed by Questions 1 to (X-1) ● Students are set the challenge of see how far they can get in a fixed time. – Could be directly related to WILFs ● Commonly seen in maths, and science, and in text book end of chapter questions.
  • 25.
    Differentiation by Task- Resource ● The teacher chooses their lesson outcomes so that they achieve the objective at different levels. ● The teacher then develops a resource that targets the middle level outcome. ● The teacher then modifies this resource up and down to achieve the upper and lower outcome. ● Students are given the appropriate resource for their learning by the teacher
  • 26.
    Differentiation by Task- Resource ● This requires very careful planning to avoid stigmatising students. ● There needs to be the option for students to ask for the next resource up – Therefore this should not be overly covert ● If covert is necessary, then a 2 level resource system is preferable. – Resources can be dealt from the top or bottom of the pile without the need for further clarification.
  • 27.
    Differentiation by Task- Negotiation ● The teacher plans a sequence of lessons for a given period of time (e.g. 2 weeks) – For each “lesson” the teacher produces a particular resource. – The resources get gradually more challenging throughout the sequence. – It is possible to have a number of strands of resources in the sequence with each strand having its own progression
  • 28.
    Differentiation by Task- Negotiation ● The students work through the sequence of lessons at their own pace. ● They are given deadlines such as: – By the end of lesson 2 all of you should have done worksheet 1 & 2 and some of you might have finished worksheet 4. ● The sequence MUST be designed so that all students are able to achieve the minimum standard by the end of the allocated time. ● It may be desirable to plan the sequence like a corkscrew: – Revisiting ideas at gradually increasing complexities.
  • 29.
    Your Task ● Thinkof a lesson that you are going to deliver to a class in the next fortnight. – Develop a suitable learning objective – Identify suitable learning outcomes for the class ● What activities might you use to deliver that lesson? ● How might you differentiate the lesson for your class? ● Develop a suitable differentiated resource to deliver your lesson. (20 mins)
  • 30.
    Objectives ● We AreLearning to: – Evaluate the use of differentiation strategies for use in our own classrooms ● What I'm looking For: – All: observe instances where we already differentiate in our classroom. – Most: Create a differentiated resource for use in a lesson next week. – Some: Evaluate the

Editor's Notes

  • #3 Brainstom Differentiation in SACS classrooms today