This document discusses representative sampling and quality assurance/quality control procedures. It covers topics such as types of samples, ideal sampling locations, data quality objectives, and examples of proper and improper sampling techniques. Quality control measures like blanks, duplicates, and standards are described to ensure sample accuracy, precision, and to check for contamination in the sampling and analysis process. Maintaining proper sample handling and preservation techniques as well as adhering to hold times for analysis are also important aspects of quality control.
Ensuring potable water for public consumption is a major Public Health Concern. This presentation sums up all the necessary and prioritized parameters conducted for water analysis.
Water has its own taste, color, smell and constituents. Not all water can be used for all purposes. Eg. Sea water can not be used by us for drinking. The suitability of water for different purposes is determined by its quality parameters. The Quality of water is equally important than quantity. Even if present in huge amounts, we can not use salt water in many life support activities. Water has its own Physical properties, Chemical composition and Biological Properties. This module highlights the water quality parameters that are essential.
Ensuring potable water for public consumption is a major Public Health Concern. This presentation sums up all the necessary and prioritized parameters conducted for water analysis.
Water has its own taste, color, smell and constituents. Not all water can be used for all purposes. Eg. Sea water can not be used by us for drinking. The suitability of water for different purposes is determined by its quality parameters. The Quality of water is equally important than quantity. Even if present in huge amounts, we can not use salt water in many life support activities. Water has its own Physical properties, Chemical composition and Biological Properties. This module highlights the water quality parameters that are essential.
Here you will find brief description about water sampling. actually it's so important to examine the water we use our daily life in order to avoid negative impact of water.
Our objective is to demonstrate how Total Organic Carbon (TOC) analysis is a quick, accurate screening alternative for critiquing cleaning validation samples.
Typical laboratory testing includes the development and implementation of analytical methods that test for residues of previously manufactured products, cleaning detergents, chemicals, solvents, byproducts, degradants, and microbial contaminates (from wet environments after the cleaning validation). TOC analysis has become one of a series of analytical methods used to assess the effectiveness of a cleaning validation. Almost any residual compound can be detected if three non-specific analytical (screening) tests are applied to a cleaning validation: TOC (for organics characteristics– carbon), pH (for acid/base characteristics) and conductivity (for ionic characteristics).
Analytical precision and analyte recovery for cleaning agents (detergents) and other possible contaminates that may be found in clean in place (CIP) solutions will be investigated for TOC. TOC analysis demonstrated equivalent or better correlation to cleaning validation compounds in comparison to traditional analytical methods. Some qualities that make TOC a viable part of a cleaning validation includes: high sensitivity, high recovery of samples, non-specific measurement, ease of use (little method development), minimal interferences and cost effectiveness.
This presentation will focus on the characteristics and benefits of TOC with general implementation guidelines for performing cleaning validation. By taking a proactive approach to one’s cleaning validation program, one can guarantee effective performance while minimizing downtime.
Air Quality Sampling and Monitoring: Stack sampling, instrumentation and methods of analysis of SO2, CO etc, legislation for control of air pollution and automobile
pollution
Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC MS) is an analytical method in which GC is coupled with MS to identify different substances within a test sample.
Here you will find brief description about water sampling. actually it's so important to examine the water we use our daily life in order to avoid negative impact of water.
Our objective is to demonstrate how Total Organic Carbon (TOC) analysis is a quick, accurate screening alternative for critiquing cleaning validation samples.
Typical laboratory testing includes the development and implementation of analytical methods that test for residues of previously manufactured products, cleaning detergents, chemicals, solvents, byproducts, degradants, and microbial contaminates (from wet environments after the cleaning validation). TOC analysis has become one of a series of analytical methods used to assess the effectiveness of a cleaning validation. Almost any residual compound can be detected if three non-specific analytical (screening) tests are applied to a cleaning validation: TOC (for organics characteristics– carbon), pH (for acid/base characteristics) and conductivity (for ionic characteristics).
Analytical precision and analyte recovery for cleaning agents (detergents) and other possible contaminates that may be found in clean in place (CIP) solutions will be investigated for TOC. TOC analysis demonstrated equivalent or better correlation to cleaning validation compounds in comparison to traditional analytical methods. Some qualities that make TOC a viable part of a cleaning validation includes: high sensitivity, high recovery of samples, non-specific measurement, ease of use (little method development), minimal interferences and cost effectiveness.
This presentation will focus on the characteristics and benefits of TOC with general implementation guidelines for performing cleaning validation. By taking a proactive approach to one’s cleaning validation program, one can guarantee effective performance while minimizing downtime.
Air Quality Sampling and Monitoring: Stack sampling, instrumentation and methods of analysis of SO2, CO etc, legislation for control of air pollution and automobile
pollution
Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC MS) is an analytical method in which GC is coupled with MS to identify different substances within a test sample.
This was a presentation that was carried out in our research method class by our group. It will be useful for PHD and master students quantitative and qualitative method. It consist sample definition, purpose of sampling, stages in the selection of a sample, types of sampling in quantitative researches, types of sampling in qualitative researches, and ethical Considerations in Data Collection.
FDA Feedback Regarding Chemistry for Toxicological Risk Assessment – How to M...Greenlight Guru
One of the newest biocompatibility evaluation tools is extractable and leachable (E&L) testing. A correctly run E&L study, with an accompanying toxicological evaluation, can be used to replace traditional tests like systemic toxicity, genotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, and carcinogenicity. The data gained from these studies can help understand the total risk of your device to an intended population of users; but unlike the traditional animal tests, it comes with separate risks. These tests are not your typical “stamped” tests, where every lab gives a similar quality of results. Because of this, FDA has refined a strict, detailed, list of parameters that should be included in every test. This list is very dynamic and is changing rapidly; the best way to make sure you are performing the correct version of the test is to learn from the most recent FDA feedback on studies.
TAKEAWAY ITEMS:
• Understand recent FDA feedback and dissect what FDA is asking/looking for
• Learn how to address these concerns and develop a protocol to make sure you don’t receive similar questions
• Recognize how FDA is using the new ISO 10993-18 and where they deviate from that standard
This session took place live at the Greenlight Guru True Quality Virtual Summit, a three-day event for medical device professionals to learn to get their devices to market faster, stay ahead of regulatory changes, and use quality as their multiplier to grow their device business.
IQ Academy Lunch & Learn Webinar | Cost Effective Water Quality Monitoring wi...IQ_UK
Lots of water quality monitoring is undertaken by the quarrying industry as part of demonstrating environmental permit compliance to the Regulator as well as day to day operational control. Cost is a very important driver in monitoring design and implementation but must not be at the expense of quality and effectiveness. This webinar will discuss how to maximise the effectiveness of water quality monitoring whilst also minimising cost.
Delivered by Dr Craig Speed, an Associate Director and Hydrochemist in Wardell Armstrong’s Water team. Craig has over 13 years of water consultancy experience and 4 years’ experience working for the Environment Agency. His expertise includes design, management and review of water quality monitoring (both groundwater and surface water), hydrochemical interpretation, providing lectures on water quality monitoring at Birmingham University, knowledge of UK water legislation (including environmental permits and abstraction licensing) and detailed knowledge of the Water Framework Directive (WFD) including WFD Compliance Assessments.
His recent project experience includes historic metal mine impact assessments, a quarry lake hydrochemistry project, a quarry conceptual model review, hydrogeology lead in major infrastructure projects, key expert in groundwater monitoring for a project in Turkey and conducting an investigation and adjudication following lime stabilisation impacts on water quality for an electrical infrastructure company.
Preanalytical quality control practices in clinical laboratoryDr. Rajesh Bendre
Preanalytical variables contribute maximally to lab errors. However, these variables are most difficult to control as they include human dependency for phlebotomy skills & pretest patient conditioning. Quantifying & monitoring these variables is also more challenging. Use of checklists, continuous training, competency assessments, internal audits & clinician education for appropriate test utilization form some of the tools for improving the preanalytical processes.
2. Agenda
Language of Sampling
Types of Samples
The Unspoken Assumptions
Ideal Sampling Locations
Data Quality Objectives
Examples:
The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
3. Introduction
Sampling usually given little thought
relative to analysis, even though critical.
Largest errors in results from sampling.
Samples are taken:
At the wrong place.
At the wrong time.
And of the wrong type.
Result: Non-representative results.
4. Samples vs. Populations
The population is the
total or all of the
possible answers we
might get by sampling.
All of the individuals in
this room.
Every 100 mL aliquot in 2
MG of influent.
We sample because we
can’t count the whole
population.
5. Representative Samples
What is representative?
Sample should represent or be typical of
the wastewater it is collected from.
If the true value of BOD5 in the wastewater
is 280 mg/L, then the sample should be
close to this value.
How do we know the sample is
representative?
Answer: Statistics
6. Representative Samples
Representative
samples should be
very close to the
mean value of the
population.
How do we know we
are close to the
mean?
Look at the sample
standard deviation.
8. Standard Deviation
The standard
deviation tells us
how spread out the
data are.
If the mean is 20
and stddev is 2,
then 68% of all
measurements are
between 18 and 22.
9. Types of Samples
Grab Samples
Exactly what it sounds like. One sample
collected at a particular point and time.
Composite Samples
Multiple samples collected and added
together to make one sample.
Time Composite.
Space Composite.
Flow Proportional Composite.
Manual versus Automatic
10. Grab Samples
May be used where population is not
changing suddenly or changing a great
deal over time.
Must be used for particular analyses:
Residual chlorine.
Fecal coliform.
Also applicable for estimating
performance under a given set of
conditions.
11. Composite Samples
Frequently used to estimate average
values over a 24-hour period.
BOD5 loading to aeration tanks.
TSS leaving the WWTP in the effluent.
Gives information over a longer period
of time or space.
Permit samples are often flow
proportional composites.
12. Composite Samples
Consideration must be given to
sample handling and storage during
compositing.
We don’t want the sample
characteristics to change while we
are sampling.
Refrigeration often used to slow
biological activity.
Chemicals may also be added as
preservatives.
13. How to Composite
Simple Composite – Add equal volumes
of samples collected from different
times or locations. Mix thoroughly.
Flow Proportional Composite – Volume
of each subsample based on flow.
Estimate total volume of sample required.
Estimate total flow over sampling period.
Calculate sample volume per flow.
15. Manual vs. Automatic
Manual samples are collected by hand.
Automatic samples are collected by
machine.
Cautions for automatic samplers:
Not necessarily better.
Not accurate when collecting <20 mL.
Clean frequently; clogging.
Variable flows and intake location.
16. Examples of Autosampler Misuse
The BOD5 Producing Equalization
Basin.
The No-Flow at Low-Flow Problem.
The 1 Day MCRT Nitrifying Basin.
17. Unstated Assumptions
For simplicity, we ASSUME that the
population we are sampling from is:
Normally distributed.
Completely mixed.
We also ASSUME that our sample
value approximates the population
mean.
These assumptions are not always true.
18. Guidelines for
Representative Sampling
Samples should be collected:
Only where wastewater is well-mixed.
In the center of the flow channel.
Horizontally and Vertically.
Avoids floating scum and settled solids.
Ensure that samplers and sample
containers are clean, uncontaminated,
and suitable for the planned analysis.
19. Guidelines for
Representative Sampling
Recommended Sample Containers:
HDPE appropriate for most analyses.
Trace metals, oil and grease, volatiles
should be sampled in glass containers.
Pre-cleaned or sterilized containers for
phosphorus testing and fecal coliforms.
When compositing or aliquoting, mix
samples well before pouring.
20. Guidelines for
Representative Sampling
Wiers are not good sampling points.
Solids settle upstream of weirs.
Oils and greases build-up downstream.
Materials tend to collect on the sides
and bottoms of channels. Avoid edges.
Before collecting the sample, rinse the
sampler and sample container several
times.
21. Agenda
Language of Sampling
Types of Samples
The Unspoken Assumptions
Ideal Sampling Locations
Data Quality Objectives
Examples:
The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
22. DQOs
There are a lot of choices in sampling.
What type of sample to take.
Where to collect the sample.
What time of day to collect the sample.
How do we know what we need?
What data quality objectives (DQOs)
are all about.
23. DQOs
A sampling and analysis plan of attack.
Plan of attack is determined by
answering these questions:
Why are we taking the sample?
What do we want to know?
How will the data be used?
What level of QA/QC is needed?
Who will take the samples?
24. Why Collect the Sample?
For process control:
Wasting calculations.
Calculation of unit process efficiency.
Estimating plant capacity.
For permitting:
Required analyses for DMR.
Required analyses for biosolids disposal.
Quantifying receiving water quality.
25. What Do We Want to Know?
Seems like a simple question……
Often neglected in sampling and
analysis plans.
Are we interested in:
Average performance?
Performance at peak load?
Dictates type of sample AND time of day.
Dictates sampling location.
26. How Will the Data be Used?
Internally or externally?
Public access?
Will results prompt capital
expenditures?
Does data need to be legally
defensible?
Dictates total number of samples,
analysis method, and QA/QC needed.
27. What level of QA/QC
is Needed?
Field and laboratory?
Frequency of QA/QC Samples?
Permit required analysis – every time.
Process control – weekly perhaps.
Certified standards needed?
Outside laboratory involved?
28. Who Will Take the Samples?
Daytime sampling and analysis not
usually a problem, but….
Nights and graveyards?
Week-ends?
May limit types of sampling to be done.
Autosamplers eliminate this problem,
but still need to be checked.
30. Plan of Attack
Why are we taking
the sample?
What do we want to
know?
How will the data be
used?
What level of
QA/QC is needed?
Who will take the
samples?
Sampling location.
Grab or composite.
Frequency of
sampling.
Analytes needed.
QA/QC required.
31. Calculate MCRT
Where to collect
samples?
Type of samples to
collect?
If multiple basins are
in use?
If basins are
independent?
32. Estimate TF Performance
For average
performance.
For peak
performance.
Develop DQOs.
What if there is
recycle?
34. Why Do We Do It?
To Check for Contamination
To Verify
Precision
Accuracy
To Determine if Interferences are
Present
ENSURES DATA QUALITY and
GIVES CONFIDENCE!
35. Contamination
Results in a false positive.
Caused by dirty glassware and improper
sampling or handling techniques
Can happen at any stage of sampling or
analysis
Happens when we add something to the
sample
Examples: Phosphorus, Fecal Coliforms, BOD5
36. Precision versus Accuracy
Neither precise nor accurate.
Precise, but not accurate.
Accurate, but not precise.
Accurate and Precise. BOTH
ARE NEEDED.
41. Filter Blank
Only needed when analyzing for
dissolved substances.
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
Ortho-phosphorus
42. Filter Blank
Checks for contamination during filtering.
Set up and clean filtration apparatus. Special
cleaning should not be done for blanks.
Filter a volume of ultra-pure water.
The filtrate is the filter blank.
The filter blank should be treated like any
other sample.
43. Reagent Blank
Ultra-pure water analyzed as a sample.
Accounts for differences in reagents
between lot numbers or batches.
Often used to “auto-zero” and
instrument.
Subtracts out background.
Can be a check for contamination.
44. Limits for Blanks
Blank values should be less than the
MDL.
MDL = Method Detection Limit.
Lowest concentration used for
reporting.
Calculated value that may be different
for different laboratories and analysts.
See EPA method for how to calculate.
45. Acceptable or Unacceptable?
MDL for Nitrate test is 0.5 mg/L
Field blank reads 0.2 mg/L
Filter blank reads 1.7 mg/L
Reagent blank reads 0.1 mg/L
Sample results are higher than normal.
What happened?
47. Field Duplicate
A second sample taken at the same
time and place as the original sample.
Placed into a separate sample bottle.
Checks whether or not the sample is
representative.
Tells us how heterogeneous the
population is.
48. Relative Standard Difference
RSD = ( A - B) * 100
((A+B)/2)
Where
A = Original Sample Result
B = Duplicate Result
Results from a field duplicate should agree
within +/- 20% RPD of original sample.
49. Relative Standard Difference
Original Sample Result – 300 mg/L BOD5
Duplicate Sample Result – 350 mg/L BOD5
Calculate the RPD
100*(300 – 350)
((300 + 350)/2) = (50/325)*100 = 15.4%
Within Limits?
50. Lab Duplicate
Tests analyst’s ability to take a representative
sample from the field sample.
Two aliquots are taken from the same sample
bottle and subjected to the same sample
preparation and analysis steps.
Don’t confuse a duplicate with a replicate. A
replicate is a second reading from the same
aliquot.
51. Relative Standard Difference
Original Sample Result – 300 mg/L TSS
Duplicate Sample Result – 180 mg/L
TSS
Calculate the RPD
100*(300 – 180)
((300 + 180)/2) = (120/240)*100 = 50.0%
WHAT HAPPENED?
53. Standards
Contain a known concentration of analyte.
Should be within the same range as the
sample concentrations.
Standard Methods recommends 5 to 50 times
the MDL.
May be purchased “certified” from outside
vendors.
Environmental Resource Associates
Hach, SPEX, VWR Scientific Products, and others
54. Standards
Standards should be analyzed
Each time an instrument is calibrated.
Once per sample batch.
Once per lot of reagents.
Standard percent recoveries should be
within + 10% of the true value.
Exception: BOD5 standard should be
within + 15% of the true value.
56. Additional Quality Control
Spike Calculations
Sample Hold Times and Preservation
Instrument Calibration
Instrument Logs and Performance
Checks
Accurate Record Keeping
Secondary Review of Calculations
57. Hold Times and Preservation
Parameter Preservative Hold time
Alkalinity 4oC 14 Days
Ammonia Nitrogen H2SO4 to pH<2, 4oC 28 Days
BOD5/CBOD5 4oC 48 Hours
COD H2SO4 to pH<2, 4oC 28 Days
Conductivity 4oC 28 Days
Fecal coliforms 4oC 24 Hours
Hardness HNO3 to pH<2, 4oC 28 Days
Nitrate 4oC 48 Hours
Nitrite 4oC 48 Hours
Total Suspended Solids 4oC 7 Days
Total Dissolved Solids 4oC 7 Days
Total Solids 4oC 7 Days
Trace Metals HNO3 to pH<2, 4oC 180 Days
58. Instrument Calibration
Minimum of a blank and one standard.
Standard Methods recommends a blank
and THREE standards.
EVERY time the instrument is used or
once per day.
59. Quality Assurance and Quality
Control: Is it All Really
Necessary?
Permitted Analyses vs. Analyses for
Process Control
Remember! Process control decisions
are only as good as the data they are
based on.
61. QA/QC by Standard Methods
Reagent Blanks – One per 20 Samples
Duplicates – One per 20 Samples
Spikes – One per 20 Samples
Instrument Calibration – Every Time
Used
Calibration Blank and Three Standards
Not all QA/QC applies to every
analysis.