A prelude to genetics of Mitochondria and Chloroplasts
the theory provides an explanation for the presence and source of organellar genome in eukaryotic cell
Basics of Undergraduate/university fellows
Nucleosome model of chromosome is proposed by ROGER KORNBERG (son of Arthur
Kornberg) in 1974.
It was confirmed and crystalised by P. Oudet et al., (1975).
Nucleosome is the lowest level of Chromosome organization in eukaryotic cells.
Nucleosome model is a scientific model which explains the organization of DNA and
associated proteins in the chromosomes.
Nucleosome model also explains the exact mechanism of the folding of DNA in
thenucleus.
It is the most accepted model of chromatin organization.
The SPECIAL - GIANT CHROMOSOMES which are very transcriptionally active DNA, where loops of DNA emerging from an apparently continuous chromosomal axis are coated with RNA polymerase.
Comparatively much larger than polytene chromosomes.
Highly significant for scientific analysis especially regarding gene amplification.
A complementation test (sometimes called a "cis-trans" test) can be used to test whether the mutations in two strains are in different genes. By taking an example of Benzer's work, complementation has been explained.
DNA is tightly packed in the nucleus of every cell. DNA wraps around special proteins called histones, which form loops of DNA called nucleosomes. These nucleosomes coil and stack together to form fibers called chromatin. Chromatin in turn forms larger loops and coils to form chromosomes.
DNA packaging is crucial because it makes sure that those excessive DNA are able to fit nicely in a cell that is many times smaller.
The DNA in bacterial cells are either circular or linear. To accommodate the size of bacterial cell, supercoiled DNA are folded into loops with each loop resembles shape of bead-like packets containing small basic proteins that is analogous to histone found in Eukaryotes.
Polytene chromosome with respect to historical basis, occurrence, structural organisation, bands and inter bands, puff are briefly stated for basic idea.
You may find this interesting understand the reason behind the gaint structure of these chromosomes.
This study material is a compilation of various sources such as text books, website etc...
Enjoy the process of Learning
Thank you
One of the first plausible models to account for the preceding observations was
formulated by Robin Holliday.
The key features of the Holliday model are the formation of heteroduplex DNA; the
creation of a cross bridge; its migration along the two heteroduplex strands,
termed branch migration; the occurrence of mismatch repair; and the
subsequent resolution, or splicing, of the intermediate structure to yield different
typesof recombinant molecules.
Most bacteria are free-living organisms that grow by increasing
in mass and then divide by binary fission.
Growth and division are controlled by genes, the expression
of which must be regulated appropriately. Genes
whose activity is controlled in response to the needs of a
cell or organism are called regulated genes. All organisms
also have a large number of genes whose products
are essential to the normal functioning of a growing and
dividing cell, no matter what the conditions are. These
genes are always active in growing cells and are known as
constitutive genes or housekeeping genes; examples include
genes that code for the enzymes needed for protein
synthesis and glucose metabolism. Note that all genes are
regulated on some level. If normal cell function is impaired
for some reason, the expression of all genes, including
constitutive genes, is reduced by regulatory
mechanisms. Thus, the distinction between regulated
and constitutive genes is somewhat arbitrary.
Basics of Undergraduate/university fellows
Nucleosome model of chromosome is proposed by ROGER KORNBERG (son of Arthur
Kornberg) in 1974.
It was confirmed and crystalised by P. Oudet et al., (1975).
Nucleosome is the lowest level of Chromosome organization in eukaryotic cells.
Nucleosome model is a scientific model which explains the organization of DNA and
associated proteins in the chromosomes.
Nucleosome model also explains the exact mechanism of the folding of DNA in
thenucleus.
It is the most accepted model of chromatin organization.
The SPECIAL - GIANT CHROMOSOMES which are very transcriptionally active DNA, where loops of DNA emerging from an apparently continuous chromosomal axis are coated with RNA polymerase.
Comparatively much larger than polytene chromosomes.
Highly significant for scientific analysis especially regarding gene amplification.
A complementation test (sometimes called a "cis-trans" test) can be used to test whether the mutations in two strains are in different genes. By taking an example of Benzer's work, complementation has been explained.
DNA is tightly packed in the nucleus of every cell. DNA wraps around special proteins called histones, which form loops of DNA called nucleosomes. These nucleosomes coil and stack together to form fibers called chromatin. Chromatin in turn forms larger loops and coils to form chromosomes.
DNA packaging is crucial because it makes sure that those excessive DNA are able to fit nicely in a cell that is many times smaller.
The DNA in bacterial cells are either circular or linear. To accommodate the size of bacterial cell, supercoiled DNA are folded into loops with each loop resembles shape of bead-like packets containing small basic proteins that is analogous to histone found in Eukaryotes.
Polytene chromosome with respect to historical basis, occurrence, structural organisation, bands and inter bands, puff are briefly stated for basic idea.
You may find this interesting understand the reason behind the gaint structure of these chromosomes.
This study material is a compilation of various sources such as text books, website etc...
Enjoy the process of Learning
Thank you
One of the first plausible models to account for the preceding observations was
formulated by Robin Holliday.
The key features of the Holliday model are the formation of heteroduplex DNA; the
creation of a cross bridge; its migration along the two heteroduplex strands,
termed branch migration; the occurrence of mismatch repair; and the
subsequent resolution, or splicing, of the intermediate structure to yield different
typesof recombinant molecules.
Most bacteria are free-living organisms that grow by increasing
in mass and then divide by binary fission.
Growth and division are controlled by genes, the expression
of which must be regulated appropriately. Genes
whose activity is controlled in response to the needs of a
cell or organism are called regulated genes. All organisms
also have a large number of genes whose products
are essential to the normal functioning of a growing and
dividing cell, no matter what the conditions are. These
genes are always active in growing cells and are known as
constitutive genes or housekeeping genes; examples include
genes that code for the enzymes needed for protein
synthesis and glucose metabolism. Note that all genes are
regulated on some level. If normal cell function is impaired
for some reason, the expression of all genes, including
constitutive genes, is reduced by regulatory
mechanisms. Thus, the distinction between regulated
and constitutive genes is somewhat arbitrary.
Answer original forum 300 words minimum Respond to both class ElbaStoddard58
Answer original forum 300 words minimum
Respond to both class mates 100 words minimum
Follow directions or I will dispute
original forum - page 1 with references
student response - page 2 with references
student response - page 3 with references
Original Forum
There are fundamental differences between the two types of cells but also similarities. An interesting concept in science is that prokaryotic cells are what gave rise to eukaryotic cells via an endosymbiotic relationship. The two primary examples of this are the mitochondria in animal cells and chloroplasts in plant cells that are very similar to bacteria.
Review the information available at
Endosymbiosis and The Origin of Eukaryotes
Once you have reviewed this information, choose
ONE
of the topics below
Topic 1:
Animal cell mitochondria
OR
Topic 2:
Plant cell chloroplasts
Research and Support your post to address the following questions in your initial post in an expository manner;
If you chose animal cells, how are mitochondria replicated within eukaryotic cells?
If you chose plant cells, how are chloroplasts replicated within plant cells?
How are these processes similar to microbes?
Do endosymbotic relationships still exist today?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of such relationships?
Student response
Eric
Good evening class,
From the information that we have been reading about this week, there is a lot to take in and especially trying to understand the prokaryotes and eukaryote relationships. According to the endosymbiotic theory proposed by Lynn Margulis more than 50 years after it was proposed, it was found that mitochondria and chloroplasts originated from prokaryotic organelles due to their “symbiotic relationship within a eukaryotic host” (Parker, 2016). After the theory was widely accepted, she wrote a book and in it explained how endosymbiosis is a huge part of evolution. Prokaryotes arose from eukaryotes with this relationship from the mitochondria. From what I gathered, it sounds like the mitochondria of the prokaryotes find duplicate in the cells of the eukaryotes as its host.
The similarities between this and microbes can be seen through its replication. Throughout its discovery, scientists learned that mitochondria has its own genome and ribosomes. This means that it is capable of its own cellular respiration. These bacterium were taken over by phagocytosis into a host cell where it remained (Parker, 2016). In terms of similarities, microbes have the same behavior when they attach themselves to a host. They remain to have a symbiotic relationship in which the host benefits from its presence, is harmed, or neither of the two.
Endosymbiotic relationships still do exist today as they are part of evolution. As we know, this kind of relationship involves one cell not being able to live without another. We can see this kind of behavior with bacteria. It has been around for millions of years and has learned to adapt itsel ...
Signal transduction Calcium Signaling vibhakhanna1
A wide range of Ca2+ signaling pathways deliver the spatial and temporal Ca2+ signals necessary to control the specific functions of different cell types, via various effector proteins and protein kinases
the ubiquitous calcium binding protein present in both animals and plants and plays a crucial role in signal transduction via calcium ions as second messengers
An introduction to the concept of Signal transduction mechanism prevalent in lower organisms, particularly bacteria. Also forms a part in many eukaryotic systems of signal transduction, particularly in the plant world.
Biological assays are methods for the estimation of nature, constitution or potency of a material by means of the reaction that follows its application to living matter
the flowering process is the combined effect of environmental factors like light and temperature. vernalisation is the epigenetic memory that leads to genetic regulation of the process
Gene pool concept for breeding purposevibhakhanna1
The Harlan and deWet gene pool concept is one of the basic concept to develop an understanding of alien gene transfer and its use in evolution of domesticated crops.
after floral induction, the inflorescence meristem eventually forms the floral meristem. the process is controlled by an array of homeotic genes. this also involves microRNAs for their regulation
molecular and genetic analysis of floral induction is an integrated approach, taking into consideration various genes involved in the four major pathways of flowering process
flowering is perhaps the most important physiological phenomenon in the life-cycle of higher plants. it is a resultant of a range of internal and external factors, that leads to the activity of a plethora of genes, that leads to the development of flowers
despite of the enormous genomic diversity, the phage genome mapping is being done using a plethora of techniques,which includes both genetic mapping and physical mapping
bacteriophages require bacterial host to complete its life-cycle, wherein site-specific genetic recombination occurs. furthermore, homologous recombination also occur in phages in case of multiple infection of the host cell.
transduction is a mode of horizontal gene transfer in which the recipient does not come in contact with the donor bacterial cell, it is mediated by temperate phages.
transformation in bacteria is a classical example of horizontal gene transfer which leads to enhanced survivability and also introduction of variations that may lead to evolution
the horizontal gene transfer in bacteria is not only important for survival but has its evolutionary significance too. this presentation is a prelude to the three classical types of HGT in bacteria
Assimilation of ammonium ions is the ultimate aim of nitrogen metabolism in plants. this is the source of nitrogen for various organic compounds of structural and functional importance for the living world
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
2. CYTOGENETICS
• BLOCK 1
• PRESENTATION 1: ENDOSYMBIOTIC THEORY:
A theory on the Origins of Eukaryotic Cells:
Mitochondria and Chloroplasts
3. Historical aspect:
• The Endosymbiotic Theory was first proposed by former
Boston University Biologist Lynn Margulis in the 1960's and
officially in her 1981 book "Symbiosis in Cell Evolution".
• Her hypothesis originally proposed that:
– mitochondria are the result of endocytosis of aerobic bacteria
– chloroplasts are the result of endocytosis of photosynthetic
bacteria
– in both cases by large anaerobic bacteria who would not
otherwise be able to exist in an aerobic environment.
– this arrangement became a mutually beneficial relationship for
both cells (symbiotic).
• The result : a cell with a double-membrane bound
organelle. The inner lipid bilayer would have been the
bacterial cell's plasma membrane, and the outer lipid
bilayer came from the cell that engulfed it.
4. Evidence to support her hypothesis:
• 1. . The timeline of life on Earth:
• a. Anaerobic bacteria: Scientists have fossil evidence of bacterial
life on Earth ~3.8 billion years ago. At this time, the atmosphere of
the Earth did not contain oxygen, and all life (bacterial cells)
was anaerobic.
b. Photosynthetic bacteria: About ~3.2 billion years ago, fossil
evidence of photosynthetic bacteria, or cyanobacteria, appears.
These bacteria use the sun's energy to make sugar. Oxygen,
released as a byproduct, began to accumulate in the atmosphere.
As a result, anaerobic cells were now a disadvantage in an oxygen-
containing atmosphere.
c. Aerobic cells appear in the fossil record : ~2.5 Billion years ago.
These cells were were able to use oxygen and convert it into energy
(ATP) and water. Organisms that could thrive in an oxygen-
containing atmosphere were now 'best suited to the environment'.
5. Evidence to support her hypothesis
(Contd.):
2. Organelles have their own DNA, and divide
independently of the cell they live in:
When Margulis initially proposed the Symbiotic
Theory, she predicted that, if the organelles were
really bacterial (prokaryotic) symbionts, they
would have their own DNA.
• In the 1980's this was proven to be the case for
two classes of organelles, the mitochondria and
chloroplasts, that they have DNA that resembled
bacterial DNA, which is different from the cell's
DNA (located in the nucleus membrane)
8. Evidence from genetics for the
endosymbiotic theory
There are multiple, independent lines of evidence to support the
hypothesis that eukaryotes evolved from an endosymbiotic event between
an ancient archaean cell and an ancient aerobic bacterium:
• Mitochondria (and chloroplasts) each have their own DNA,
– Their DNA is organized in a circular chromosome like typical
prokaryotic genomes, and
– Their genomes contain genes that are very similar to genes found in
prokaryotic genomes.
• Mitochondria (and chloroplasts) reproduce by binary fission, the process
that prokaryotes use to reproduce. In contrast, eukaryotic cells reproduce
by mitosis.
• If the mitochondria (or chloroplasts) are removed from a eukaryotic cell,
the cell has no way to produce new ones. In other words, the
“instructions” to make new mitochondria/chloroplasts is not present in
the eukaryotic nuclear genome; they are present in the
mitochondria/chloroplast genomes.
9. Mitochondria:
Notable facts
• One of the major features distinguishing prokaryotes from
eukaryotes is the presence of mitochondria.
• Eukaryotic cells may contain anywhere from one to several
thousand mitochondria, depending on the cell’s level of
energy consumption.
• Each mitochondrion measures 1 to 10 or greater
micrometers in length and exists in the cell as an organelle
that can be ovoid to worm-shaped to intricately branched.
• Mitochondria arise from the division of existing
mitochondria; they may fuse together; and they may be
moved around inside the cell by interactions with the
cytoskeleton.
• However, mitochondria cannot survive outside the cell.
10. Origin of Mitochondria
• Eukaryotes evolved during the Proterozoic eon. Prior to the
origin of eukaryotes, all life on Earth was prokaryotic.
• According to the endosymbiotic theory, eukaryotes arose
as a result of a fusion of Archaean cells with bacteria,
where an ancient Archaean engulfed (but did not eat) an
ancient, aerobic bacterial cell.
• As the atmosphere was oxygenated by photosynthesis, and
as successful aerobic prokaryotes evolved, evidence
suggests that an ancestral cell with some membrane
compartmentalization engulfed a free-living aerobic
prokaryote, specifically an alpha-proteobacterium.
11. Origin of Mitochondria (Contd.)
• The engulfed (endosymbiosed) bacterial cell
developed a mutualistic relationship within the
archaean cell : the engulfed bacterium allowed
the host archean cell to use oxygen to release
energy stored in nutrients, and the host cell
protected the bacterial cell from predators.
• Over many generations, a symbiotic relationship
developed between the two organisms so
completely that neither could survive on its own.
Thus mitochondria came into existence within
eukaryotic cell.
12. Evidence For Endosymbiotic Origin Of
Mitochondria
• Several lines of evidence support that mitochondria are
derived from this endosymbiotic event.
– Most mitochondria are shaped like alpha-proteobacteria and
– are surrounded by two membranes, which would result when
one membrane-bound organism was engulfed into a vacuole by
another membrane-bound organism.
– The mitochondrial inner membrane is extensive and involves
substantial infoldings called cristae that resemble the textured,
outer surface of alpha-proteobacteria.
– The matrix and inner membrane are rich with the enzymes
necessary for aerobic respiration.
– Mitochondria divide independently by a process that resembles
binary fission in prokaryotes.
13. Evidence For Endosymbiotic Origin Of
Mitochondria (Contd.)
– Specifically, mitochondria are not formed from scratch (de
novo) by the eukaryotic cell; they reproduce within it, as if
they are independent organisms and are distributed with the
cytoplasm when a cell divides or two cells fuse.
– Mitochondria have their own (usually) circular DNA
chromosome
– Mitochondrial DNA is stabilized by attachments to the inner
membrane and carries genes similar to genes expressed by
alpha-proteobacteria.
– Mitochondria also have special ribosomes and t-RNAs that
resemble these components in prokaryotes.
These features all support that mitochondria were once
free-living prokaryotes.
14. Ancestry of Mitochondria
Mitochondria that carry out aerobic respiration have
their own genomes, with genes similar to those in
alpha-proteobacteria.
– Many of the genes, of alpha-proteobacterial origin, for
respiratory proteins are located in the nucleus.
– Additionally, in some eukaryotic groups, such genes are
found in the mitochondria, whereas in other groups, they
are found in the nucleus.
This has been interpreted as evidence that genes have
been transferred from the endosymbiont chromosome
to the host genome.
*This loss of genes by the endosymbiont is probably
one explanation why mitochondria cannot live without
a host.
15. Timeline of Endosymbiosis
• Some living eukaryotes are anaerobic and cannot survive in
the presence of too much oxygen. Some appear to lack
organelles that could be recognized as mitochondria. Some of
these eukaryotes were descended from ancestors whose
lineages had diverged from the lineage of mitochondrion-
containing eukaryotes before endosymbiosis occurred.
• Reduced organelles are found in most, if not all, anaerobic
eukaryotes, and that all eukaryotes appear to carry some
genes in their nuclei that are of mitochondrial origin.
• In addition to the aerobic generation of ATP, mitochondria
have several other metabolic functions. One of these
functions is to generate clusters of iron and sulfur that are
important cofactors of many enzymes. Such functions are
often associated with the reduced mitochondrion-derived
organelles of anaerobic eukaryotes. Therefore, most biologists
accept that the last common ancestor of eukaryotes had
mitochondria.
16. Plastids
• The cells of photosynthetic eukaryotes contain,
an organelle called a plastid.
• The plastids of photosynthetic cells are rich in
chlorophyll a and a range of other
pigments(accessory pigments), which are
involved in harvesting energy from light.
Photosynthetic plastids are called chloroplasts
• Like mitochondria, plastids appear to have an
endosymbiotic origin. This hypothesis was also
supported by Lynn Margulis.
17. Ancestry of Chloroplasts
• Plastids are derived from cyanobacteria that lived inside
the cells of an ancestral, aerobic, heterotrophic eukaryote.
This is called primary endosymbiosis, and plastids of
primary origin are surrounded by two membranes.
• The best evidence is that this has happened twice in the
history of eukaryotes.
– In one case, the common ancestor of the major
lineage/supergroup Archaeplastida took on a cyanobacterial
endosymbiont;
– in the other, the ancestor of the small amoeboid rhizarian
taxon, Paulinella, took on a different cyanobacterial
endosymbiont.
• Almost all photosynthetic eukaryotes are descended from
the first event, and only a couple of species are derived
from the other.
18. Ancestry of Chloroplasts (Contd.)
• Cyanobacteria are a group of Gram-negative bacteria
with all the conventional structures of the group.
However, unlike most prokaryotes, they have
extensive, internal membrane-bound sacs called
thylakoids. Chlorophyll is a component of these
membranes, as are many of the proteins of the light
reactions of photosynthesis. Cyanobacteria also have
the peptidoglycan wall and lipopolysaccharide layer
associated with Gram-negative bacteria.
• Chloroplasts of primary origin have thylakoids, a
circular DNA chromosome, and ribosomes similar to
those of cyanobacteria. Each chloroplast is surrounded
by two membranes.
19. Ancestry of Chloroplasts (Contd.)
• In the group of Archaeplastida called the
glaucophytes and in Paulinella, a thin
peptidoglycan layer is present between the
outer and inner plastid membranes. All other
plastids lack this relictual cyanobacterial wall.
The outer membrane surrounding the plastid
is thought to be derived from the vacuole in
the host, and the inner membrane is thought
to be derived from the plasma membrane of
the symbiont.
20. Evidence For Endosymbiotic Origin Of
Plastids
• There is also, as with the case of mitochondria, strong
evidence that many of the genes of the endosymbiont
were transferred to the nucleus.
• Plastids, like mitochondria, cannot live independently
outside the host.
• In addition, like mitochondria, plastids are derived
from the division of other plastids and never built from
scratch.
• Researchers have suggested that the endosymbiotic
event that led to Archaeplastida occurred 1 to 1.5
billion years ago, at least 5 hundred million years after
the fossil record suggests that eukaryotes were
present.
21. Evidence For Endosymbiotic Origin Of
Plastids (Contd.)
• Not all plastids in eukaryotes are derived directly from
primary endosymbiosis. Some of the major groups of
algae became photosynthetic by secondary
endosymbiosis, that is, by taking in either green algae
or red algae (both from Archaeplastida) as
endosymbionts
• Secondary plastids are surrounded by three or more
membranes, and some secondary plastids even have
clear remnants of the nucleus of endosymbiotic alga.
• There are cases where tertiary or higher-order
endosymbiotic events are the best explanations for
plastids in some eukaryotes.
22. Definition of the Basic Concepts:
• Endosymbiotic theory: The theory that states -
‘eukaryotes may have been a product of one cell
engulfing another, one living within another, and
evolving over time until the separate cells were
no longer recognizable as such’.
• Endosymbiosis: engulfment of one cell within
another such that the engulfed cell survives, and
both cells benefit; the process responsible for the
evolution of mitochondria and chloroplasts in
eukaryotes
23. GUESS!!!!
• What evidence is there that mitochondria
were incorporated into the ancestral
eukaryotic cell before chloroplasts?
– All eukaryotic cells have mitochondria, but not all
eukaryotic cells have chloroplasts.
24. A QUESTION?...
• Describe the hypothesized steps in the origin of eukaryotic
cells.
– Eukaryotic cells arose through endosymbiotic events that gave
rise to the energy-producing organelles within the eukaryotic
cells such as mitochondria and chloroplasts.
– The nuclear genome of eukaryotes is related most closely to the
Archaea, so it may have been an early archaean that engulfed a
bacterial cell that evolved into a mitochondrion.
– Mitochondria appear to have originated from an alpha-
proteobacterium, whereas chloroplasts originated as a
cyanobacterium.
– There is also evidence of secondary endosymbiotic events.
Other cell components may also have resulted from
endosymbiotic events.
25.
26. REFERENCES
• Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, et al. Molecular
Biology of the Cell. 4th edition. New York:
Garland Science; 2002. The Genetic Systems
of Mitochondria and Plastids. Available from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK269
24/
• The information was adapted from OpenStax
Biology