This document provides an overview of fundamentals of modified release formulations. It discusses different mechanisms for controlling drug release including diffusion controlled, dissolution controlled, and erosion controlled systems. It describes key aspects of reservoir and matrix devices for diffusion controlled release as well as encapsulation and matrix systems for dissolution controlled release. The document also covers erosion controlled delivery, hybrid systems, relevant mathematical models, and some examples of marketed modified release products.
Video Lecture is available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXu_CLgB4q0
Introduction, terminology/definitions and rationale, advantages, disadvantages, selection of drug candidates. Approaches to design-controlled release formulations based on diffusion, dissolution and ion exchange principles. Physicochemical and
biological properties of drugs relevant to controlled release formulations.
Description about a type of activation modulated drug delivery system, which a type of control drug delivery system.
Also, give a detailed description about each subclassification.
CrDDS is one which delivers the drug at a predetermined rate, for locally or systematically, for a prolong period of time.
Controlled Release Oral Drug Delivery System
Controlled drug delivery is one which delivers the drug at a predetermined rate, for locally or systemically, for a specified period of time.
It includes Introductory part about what is Dissolution...then Mechanism of Dissolution is elaborated...Theories of Dissolution also given..It also includes Factors affecting Dissolution profile..Along with References given below for easily searching..
Video Lecture is available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXu_CLgB4q0
Introduction, terminology/definitions and rationale, advantages, disadvantages, selection of drug candidates. Approaches to design-controlled release formulations based on diffusion, dissolution and ion exchange principles. Physicochemical and
biological properties of drugs relevant to controlled release formulations.
Description about a type of activation modulated drug delivery system, which a type of control drug delivery system.
Also, give a detailed description about each subclassification.
CrDDS is one which delivers the drug at a predetermined rate, for locally or systematically, for a prolong period of time.
Controlled Release Oral Drug Delivery System
Controlled drug delivery is one which delivers the drug at a predetermined rate, for locally or systemically, for a specified period of time.
It includes Introductory part about what is Dissolution...then Mechanism of Dissolution is elaborated...Theories of Dissolution also given..It also includes Factors affecting Dissolution profile..Along with References given below for easily searching..
INTRODUCTION
Conventional oral drug delivery systems are known to provide an immediate release of drug, in which one cannot control the release of the drug and effective concentration at the target site. The bioavailability of drug from these formulations may vary significantly, depending on factors such as physico-chemical properties of the drug, presence of excipients, various physiological factors such as the presence or absence of food, pH of the GI tract, GI motility, etc. so to overcome this limitation oral route is replied by parenteral route. This route offers the advantage of reduced dose, targeting of site and avoiding GI stability, hepatic by-pass of drug molecule. (1)
In recent years, much attention has focused on novel drug delivery systems (NDDS). There are many designing options available to control or modify the drug release from a dosage form. Numerous technologies have been used to control the systemic delivery of drugs.
Based on the mechanism of the drug release can be classified as:
Diffusion controlled (matrix and reservoir type of systems)
Dissolution controlled (surface eroding, surface swelling type of systems)
Osmotic drug delivery
Multi particulate systems
Enteric coated (pH dependent systems)
One of the most interesting one is that employs osmotic pressure as an energy source for release of drugs.
The role of drug development is to take a therapeutically effective molecule with sub-optimal physicochemical and/or physiological properties and develop an optimized product that will still be therapeutically effective with additional benefits such as:
Sustained and consistent blood levels within the therapeutic window
Enhanced bioavailability
Reduced interpatient variability
Customized delivery profiles
Decreased dosing frequency
Improved patient compliance
Reduced side effects.
Osmotically controlled oral drug delivery systems (OCODDS) utilize osmotic pressure as the energy source for the controlled delivery of drugs. Drug release from these systems is independent of pH and hydrodynamic conditions of the gastro-intestinal tract (GIT) to a large extent and release characteristics can be easily adjusted by optimizing the parameters of the delivery system.
PRINCIPLE
The flow of solvent depends on SPM characteristics and different osmosis pressures between two sides of regions.
Osmosis pressure for concentrated solution of soluble solutes commonly used in controlled release formulation are extremely high, ranging from 30 atm for sodium phosphate up to 500 atm for a lactose-fructose mixture (US patent number 4077407). These osmosis pressures can produce high water flows across semi permeable membrane.
TYPES OF PUMPS
Oral Osmotic Pumps
Elementary osmotic pump(8)
Push Pull Osmotic Pump(9)
Controlled porosity Osmotic Pumps (CPOP)(10)
OROS CT System(11)
NEED OF THE STUDY
Present investigation is to develop controlled osmotic tablet of
Abstract: The main objective of present investigation is to formulate the sustained release
tablet of Rosiglitazone Maleate using 32 factorial design. Rosiglitazone Maleate, an oral antidiabetic
agent. The SR tablets of Rosiglitazone Maleate were prepared employing different
concentrations of HPMCK15M and Carboplol934P in different combinations as a rate
retardants by Direct Compression technique using 32 factorial design. The quantity/
concentration of Polymers , HPMCK15M and Carboplol934P required to achieve the desired
drug release was selected as independent variables, X1 and X2 respectively whereas, time
required for 10% of drug dissolution (t10%), 50% (t50%), 75% (t75%) and 90% (t90%) were
selected as dependent variables. Totally nine formulations were designed and are evaluated
for hardness, friability, thickness, % drug content, In-vitro drug release. From the Results it
was concluded that all the formulation were found to be with in the Pharmacopoeial limits
and the In-vitro dissolution profiles of all formulations were fitted in to different Kinetic
models, the statistical parameters like intercept (a), slope (b) & regression coefficient (r)
were calculated. Polynomial equations were developed for t10%, t50%, t75%, t90%. Validity of
developed polynomial equations were verified by designing 2 check point formulations(C1,
C2). According to SUPAC guidelines the formulation (F5) containing combination of 25%
HPMCK15M and 20% Carboplol934P, is the most similar formulation (similarity factor
f2=93.1376, dissimilarity factor f1= 1.7642 & No significant difference, t= 0.06949) to
marketed product (AVANDIA). The selected formulation (F5) follows Higuchi’s kinetics,
and the mechanism of drug release was found to be Fickian Diffusion (n= 0.417).
Formulation and evaluation of transdermal drug delivery system (TDDS)SanketPawar47
This is slide about formulation and evaluations of transdermal drugs delivery system . Introduction , general structure of TDDS , basic components of TDDS , approch for formulation of TDDS , manufacturing processes for TDDS ,and evaluations of TDDS
These systems are capable of controlling the rate of drug delivery, sustaining the duration of therapeutic efficacy, and/or targeting the delivery of drug to a tissue. Depending upon the technical sophistication, these rate-control drug delivery systems can be classified into three major categories: (i) pre-programmed drug delivery, (ii) activation-controlled drug delivery, and (iii) feedback-regulated drug delivery.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
1. FUNDAMENTALS OF MODIFIED
RELEASE FORMULATIONS
Dr. Basavraj K. Nanjwade M. Pharm., Ph. D
Professor of Pharmaceutics
Department of Pharmaceutics
KLE University College of Pharmacy
BELGAUM – 590010, Karnataka, INDIA
1
3. DIFFUSION CONTROLLED
In these type of system the rate controlling step is not dissolution rate
but the diffusion of dissolved drug through a polymeric barrier.
Since the diffusional path length increases with time as the insoluble
matrix is gradually depleted by the drug and the release of drug is
never zero order.
This system are broadly classified into two categories reservoir system
and monolithic system.
3
4. DIFFUSION CONTROLLED
There are following type of diffusion controlled system
1. Reservoir devices
2. Matrix devices
1. Reservoir devices:-
Drug will partition in to the membrane and exchange with fluid
surrounding the particle or tablet.
The water soluble polymer material encases a core of drug.
Additional drug will enter the membrane, diffuse to the
periphery and exchange with the surrounding media. 4
5. RESERVOIR DIFFUSION CONTROLLED
SYSTEM
These systems are hollow in which core of drug is surrounded in
water insoluble polymer membrane.
Coating or microencapsulation technique are
used to apply polymer.
The permeability of membrane depend on thickness
of the coat/concentration of coating solution & on the nature of
polymer, ethyl cellulose and polyvinyl acetate are the commonly
used polymer in such devices.
5
6. RESERVOIR DIFFUSION CONTROLLED
SYSTEM
The mechanism of drug release across the membrane
involves partitioning into the membrane with subsequent
release into the surrounding fluid by diffusion.
The rate of drug release from the reservoir system can be
explained by Fick ’s Law of diffusion as per the following
equation.
dm/dt = DSK(ΔC)/l
6
7. dm/dt = DSK(ΔC)/l
Where,
S = is the active diffusion area.
D = is the diffusion coefficient of the drug across the coating
membrane.
l = is the diffusional path length (thickness of polymer coat)
ΔC = is the concentration difference across l.
K = is the partition coefficient of the drug between polymer
and the external medium.
7
8. METHODS TO DEVELOP THE RESERVOIR
DEVICES
There are 2 processes used to apply insoluble polymeric materials
to enclose drug containing core in tablets.
Press coating & Air suspension techniques
Microencapsulation process is commonly used.
In most cases drug is incorporated in coating film as well as in
the microcapsule.
Care should be taken during placement into tablet or capsule
dosage forms to minimize fragmentation or fusion of the particle
both effects will alter release characteristics. 8
9. 2. MATRIX DIFFUSION CONTROLLED SYSTEM
In these system the drug is dispersed in insoluble matrix of rigid
non swellable hydrophobic materials or swellable hydrophilic
substances.
Insoluble plastics such as PVC and fatty materials like stearic
acid, beeswax etc are the material used for rigid matrix.
The drug is generally kneaded within the solution of plastic
material such as PVC in an organic solvent and granulated. The
wax drug matrix is prepared by dispersing the drug in molten fat
followed by congealing.
9
11. MATRIX DIFFUSION CONTROLLED SYSTEM
• The equation describing drug release for this system is given
by T. Higuchi.
Q=[Dἐ /T (La-ἐCs)Cs t]1/2
Q = weight in gram of drug release/unit surface area
D = diffusion coefficient
Cs = solubility of drug in the release medium
ἐ = Porosity of matrix
T = tourtuosity of matrix
A = Concentration of drug in the tablet express as g/ml
11
12. MATRIX DIFFUSION CONTROLLED SYSTEM
Assumptions made in the previous equations :
A pseudo-steady state is maintained during release .
A>>Cs , i.e. , excess solute is present .
C=0 in solution at all times ( perfect sink ) .
Drug particles are much smaller than those in the matrix .
The diffusion coefficient remains constant .
No interaction between the drug and the matrix occurs .
12
13. MATRIX DIFFUSION CONTROLLED SYSTEM
The release of highly water soluble drug can be sustained by
using swellable matrix systems.
Hydrophilic gums may be of natural origin (Guar gum,
tragacanth), semi synthetic (HPMC, CMC, Xanthan gum) or
synthetic (poly acryl amides) are the material generally used
for such matrices.
In the solvent such as alcohol the gum and drug are
granulated together and compressed into tablet.
13
14. MATRIX DIFFUSION CONTROLLED SYSTEM
The mechanism of drug release from this system involves
initial dehydration of hydrogel followed by absorption of
water and desorption of drug via swelling controlled
diffusion mechanism.
As the gum swells and the drug diffuses out of it, the
swollen mass devoid of drug appear transparent or glass like
and so the system is sometimes called as glassy hydrogel.
14
15. Advantages and Disadvantages of Matrix and
Reservoir system
Matrix system Reservoir system
Suitable for both non- Degradable reservoir systems
degradable and degradable system. may be difficult to design
No danger of ‘dose dumping’ Rupture can result in dangerous
in case of rupture. Dose dumping.
Achievement of ‘zero order’ Achievement of zero order
release is difficult. release is easy.
15
16. DISSOLUTION CONTROLLED RELEASE
These system are easiest to design.
The drug with slow dissolution rate is inherently sustained.
E.g. Griseofulvin, Digoxin and Saliyclamide & they act as
natural prolonged release products.
16
17. Aluminum aspirin and ferrous sulfate produce slow
dissolving form when it comes in contact with GI fluids.
Drugs having high aqueous solubility & dissolution rate
E.g. Pentoxifylline steroid undergo transformation into less
soluble polymorphs during dissolution in absorption pool.
DISSOLUTION CONTROLLED RELEASE
17
18. DISSOLUTION CONTROLLED RELEASE
The basic principle of dissolution control is as follows: If the
dissolution process is diffusion layer controlled where the rate
of diffusion from the solid surface through a unstirred liquid
film to the bulk solution is rate limiting, the flux ‘J’ is given by
J= -D(dc/dx)
Where,
D = Diffusion coefficient.
Dc/ dx = Concentration gradient between the solid surface and
bulk of solution.
18
19. In terms of flow rate of material (dm/dt) through unit area (A), the
flux can be given as
J = (1/A) dm/dt
For the system with linear concentration gradient and thickness of the
diffusion layer ‘h’
dc/ dx = (Cb - Cs)
Where Cs represents the concentration at the solid surface and Cb is
the bulk solution concentration. A combined equation for rate of
material is given as
dm/dt = - (DA/h) (Cb - Cs) = kA (Cs - Cb)
Where, k is intrinsic dissolution rate constant.
DISSOLUTION CONTROLLED RELEASE
19
20. Dissolution controlled release products are divided
in two classes:
1) Encapsulation dissolution control.
2) Matrix dissolution control.
1. Encapsulation/Coating dissolution controlled system
(Reservoir Devices):
Encapsulation involves coating of individual particles, or
granules of drug with the slowly dissolving material.
The particles obtained after coating can be compressed
directly into tablets as in spacetabs or placed in capsules as
in the spansule products.
20
21. Encapsulation/Coating dissolution controlled
system (Reservoir Devices):
As the time required for dissolution of coat is a function of
its thickness and the aqueous solubility of the polymer one
can obtain the coated particles of varying thickness in the
range of 1- 200 micron.
21
22. Encapsulation/Coating dissolution controlled
system (Reservoir Devices):
By using one of several microencapsulation techniques the
drug particles are coated or encapsulated with slowly
dissolving materials like cellulose, PEGs, olymethacrylates,
waxes etc.
Two methods of preparation are employed :
1. Seed or granule coating
2. Microencapsulation
22
23. Seed or Granule Coated Products :
Procedure:
Non pareil seeds are coated with drug
This followed with by a coat of slowly dissolving material such as
carbohydrate sugars & cellulose , PEG , polymeric material & wax.
Coated granules can be placed in a capsule for administration.
E.g. amobarbital & dextroamphetamine sulfate
Microencapsulation :
• This method can be used to encase liquids , solids , or gases.
E.g. aspirin & potassium chloride
• Advantage of this method is that sustained drug release can be
achieved with taste abatement & better GI tolerability.
Encapsulation/Coating dissolution controlled
system (Reservoir Devices):
23
24. MICROENCAPSULATION PROCESSES
PROCESSES TYPES OF MATERIALS FOR
COATING
COASERVATION/ PHASE
SEPARATION
WATER –SOLUBLE POLYMER
INTERFACIAL
POLYMERIZATION
WATER-INSOLUBLE &WATER
SOLUBLE MONOMER
ELECTOSTATIC METHOD OPPOSITELY CHARGED
AEROSOLS
PRECIPITATION WATER OR SOLVENT-SOLUBLE
POLYMER
HOT MELT LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT
LIPIDS
SALTING OUT WATER-SOLUBLE POLYMERS
SOLVENT EVAPORATION SOLVENT-SOLUBLE POLYMERS
24
25. 2. Matrix (or Monolith)/ Embedded dissolution
controlled system.
Since the drug is homogeneously dispersed throughout a rate
controlling medium matrix system are also called monoliths.
The waxes used for such system are beeswax, carnauba wax,
hydrogenated castor oil etc.
These waxes control the drug dissolution by controlling the rate
of dissolution fluid penetration into the matrix by altering the
porosity of tablet, decreasing its wettability or by itself dissolved
at a slower rate. 25
26. Matrix (or Monolith)/ Embedded dissolution
controlled system.
The dispersion of drug wax is prepared by dispersing the drug in
the molten wax followed by congealing and granulating the
same.
The process, compression parameters and size of particles
formed determine the release rate from this system. The drug
release is often first order from such matrices.
26
28. MARKETED FORMULATIONS
Dosage form Nature of chemical
entity
Release
mechanism
Company
Geomatrix Multilayered
tablets
- Dissolution Skye
pharmaceuticals,p
lc., (USA).
Reduced irritation
system
Capsules - Dissolution DepoMed, Inc.
Dimatrix
(Diffusion
consulted matrix
system)
Tablets - Dosage form Biovail
corporation
international,
IDDAS (Intestinal
Protective Drug
Absorption)
system
Tablets Hydrophillic
compounds
Diffusion Elan corporation
Multipor Tablets - Diffusion Ethical
Holding,plc.,
(UK).
PPDS (Pellatized
Pulsatile Delivery
Pellets (tablets) - Diffusion Andrx
pharmaceuticals.28
29. SMHS (Solubility
Modulating
Hydrogel System)
Tablets - Diffusion Andrx
pharmaceuticals
SPDS (Stablized
Pellets Delivery
System)
Pellets Unstable drugs Diffusion Andrx
pharmaceuticals
RingCap Matrix tablets - Diffusion Alker
MODAS (Multi
porous oral drug
absorption system)
Tablets Tablets Diffusion and
dissolution
Elan corporation,
(Ireland).
PRODAS
(Programmable
Oral Drug
Absorption
System)
Encapsulated
minitablets
Hydrophilic
molecules
Diffusion and
Dissolution
Elan corporation
SODAS
(Spheroidal Oral
Drug Absorption
System)
Beads (capsules
tablets)
Diffusion and
Dissolution
Elan corporation.
MARKETED FORMULATIONS
29
30. EROSION CONTROLLED DRUG DELIVERY
SYSTEM
Erosion is defined as the disintegration of the polymer/ wax
matrix, as a result of degradation and is characterized by
material loss from the polymer generally in the physical state.
Polymer or wax degradation or hydrolysis is brought by
enzyme, pH change or due to osmotic pressure or hydrodynamic
pressure that causes fragmentation.
Erosion is effected by external stimuli, such systems can be
classified under stimuli activated drug delivery system. 30
31. EROSION CONTROLLED DRUG DELIVERY
SYSTEM
It is classified on the type of stimuli:
1. Physical e.g. (osmotic pressure)
2. Chemical e.g.(pH)
3. Biological e.g. (enzyme)
Examples of erodible matrices include hydrophobic
materials ethyl cellulose and waxes.
Depending on the erosion mechanism, polymer or waxes
undergo either surface erosion or bulk erosion
31
32. EROSION CONTROLLED DRUG DELIVERY
SYSTEM
a) SURFACE EROSION:
It occurs from the surface layers of the device only.
It results in gradual decrease in the size of the device while
the bulk phase remain un-degraded.
There is a difference in erosion rate between the surface
and centre of matrix, the process is also called as
heterogeneous erosion.
Surface erosion occurs when water penetration is
restricted to device surface. 32
34. EROSION CONTROLLED DRUG DELIVERY
SYSTEM
b) BULK EROSION:
it occurs throughout the polymer bulk and the process is
thus called as homogenous erosion.
Bulk erosion occurs when the water is readily able to
penetrate the matrix of the device.
34
35. HYBRID SYSTEM IN DRUG DELIVERY
They are also called as membrane cum matrix drug delivery
system.
These systems are those where the drug in matrix of release-
retarding material is further coated with a release
controlling polymer membrane.
It combines constant release kinetics of reservoir system
with mechanical robustness of matrix system. 35
36. EROSION CONTROLLED DRUG DELIVERY
SYSTEM
Degradation by erosion normally takes place in devices that are
prepared from soluble polymers.
In such instances, the device erodes as water is absorbed into the
systems causing the polymer chains to hydrate, swell, and ultimately
dissolved away from the dosage form.
Degradation can also result from chemical changes to the polymer
including cleavage of covalent bonds, ionization and protonation
either along the polymer backbone or on pendent side chains.
36
37. MATHEMATICAL MODELS
There are various mathematical models
1) Zero order kinetics
2) First order kinetics
3) Weibull model
4) Higuchi model
5) Hixson Crowell model
6) Korsmeyer Peppas model
7) Baker- Lonsdale model
8) Hopfenberg model
37
39. ZERO ORDER KINETICS
This model is used for dosage forms that do not
disaggregate and release the drug slowly (assuming that
area does not change and no equilibrium conditions are
obtained).
It can be represented by the following equation:
Wo - Wt = Kt
39
40. Wo - Wt = Kt
Where W is the initial amount of drug in the pharmaceutical
dosage form, W is the amount of drug in the pharmaceutical
dosage form at time t and K is a proportionality constant.
Dividing this equation by W0 and simplifying.
ft= kot
Where ft = 1-(Wt –W0) and f represents the fraction of drug
dissolved in time t and k0 the apparent dissolution rate
constant or zero order release constant. 40
41. FIRST ORDER KINETICS
This model is applied for dissolution studies, and also
describe the absorption and elimination of some drugs.
ln Qt = ln Q0 + Kt
Qt = Drug amounts remaining to be released at time t
Q0 = Drug amounts remaining to be released at zero hr
Kt = First order release constant.
A graph of drug release versus time will be linear.
41
42. WEIBULL MODEL
A general empirical equation adopted by Weibull was used
to describe the release process.
Erodible matrix formulations follow this model.
M = 1- e[-(t-Ti)b/a
42
43. HIGUCHI MODEL
Diffusion matrix formulations follow this model.
This model is used to study the release of water soluble and
low soluble drugs incorporated in semisolid and / or solid
matrixes.
It is denoted by the following equation
ft = KHt1/2
ft = fraction of drug released at time t
KH = Higuchi release rate constant
t = time 43
44. HIXSON – CROWELL MODEL
Erodible matrix systems follow this model.
When this model is used, it is assumed that release rate is
limited by the drug particles dissolution rate, and not by the
diffusion that may occur through polymeric matrix.
It is represented by the following equation
Wo1/3 – Wt1/3= Kst
44
45. HIXSON – CROWELL MODEL
Wo1/3 – Wt1/3= Kst
Where,
Wo = initial amount of drug present in the matrix.
Wt = amount of drug released in time t.
Ks = release rate constant.
45
46. KORSMEYER- PEPPA’S MODEL
Swellable polymer devices follow this model.
This model is generally used to analyze the release of
pharmaceutical polymeric dosage forms, when the release
mechanism is not well known or when more than one type
of release phenomena could be involved.
It is denoted by the following equation.
Mt/M∞ = Ktn
46
47. KORSMEYER- PEPPA’S MODEL
Mt/M∞ = Ktn
Where,
Mt = amount released at time t
M∞= amount released at infinite time
K = release rate constant
n = release exponents
47
48. BAKER- LANSDALE MODEL
This model is suitable for microcapsules or microspheres.
It describes the drug controlled release from a spherical
matrix.
ft = 3/2[1-(1-Mt/M∞)2/3] – Mt/M∞= Kt
Where,
Ft = fraction of drug released at time t
Mt = amount released at time t
M∞ = amount released at infinite time
48
49. HOPFENBERG MODEL
This model was used for the release of drugs from surface-
eroding devices with several geometries.
This equation describes drug release from slabs, spheres and
infinite cylinders displaying heterogeneous erosion.
It is given by the following the equation.
Mt/M∞ 1 – [1-k1t(t-l)]n
49
50. HOPFENBERG MODEL
Mt = amount released at time t
M∞ = amount released at infinite time
K = rate constant
Mt/M∞ 1 – [1-k1t(t-l)]n
50
53. INTRODUCTION
The term Optimize is defined as “to make perfect”.
It is used in pharmacy relative to formulation and processing
Involved in formulating drug products in various forms
It is the process of finding the best way of using the existing
resources while taking in to the account of all the factors that
influences decisions in any experiment
53
54. In development projects , one generally experiments by a
series of logical steps, carefully controlling the variables &
changing one at a time, until a satisfactory system is
obtained
It is not a screening technique.
Optimization tech provide both depth of understanding &
ability to explore & defend range for formulation &
processing factors.
INTRODUCTION
54
57. Independent variables or primary variables :
Formulations and process variables are directly
under control of the formulator. These includes
ingredients
Dependent or secondary variables :
These are the responses of the in progress material
or the resulting drug delivery system. It is the result of
independent variables
VARIABLES
57
58. Relationship between independent variables and response
defines response surface.
Representing >2 becomes graphically impossible
Higher the variables , higher are the complications hence it
is to optimize each & everyone.
VARIABLES
58
59. Response surface representing the relationship between the
independent variables X1 and X2 and the dependent variable
Y.
VARIABLES
59
60. CLASSIC OPTIMIZATION
It involves application of calculus to basic problem for
maximum/minimum function.
Applications:
i. Problems that are not too complex
ii. They do not involve more than two variables
For more than two variables graphical representation is
impossible.
It is possible mathematically.
60
61. GRAPH REPRESENTING THE RELATION
BETWEEN THE RESPONSE VARIABLE AND
INDEPENDENT VARIABLE
61
62. Using calculus the graph obtained can be solved.
Y = f (x)
When the relation for the response y is given as the function of two
independent variables,X1 &X2
Y = f(X1 , X2)
The above function is represented by contour plots on which the axes
represents the independent variables X1& X2
CLASSIC OPTIMIZATION
62
63. STATISTICAL DESIGN
These Techniques are divided in to two types.
Experimentation continues as optimization proceeds
It is represented by evolutionary operations(EVOP) and
simplex methods.
Experimentation is completed before optimization takes
place.
It is represented by classic mathematical & search
methods.
63
64. There are two possible approaches
Theoretical approach- If theoretical equation is known , no
experimentation is necessary.
Empirical or experimental approach – With single
independent variable formulator experiments at several
levels.
STATISTICAL DESIGN
64
65. The relationship with single independent variable can be obtained by
simple regression analysis or by least squares method.
The relationship with more than one important variable can be
obtained by statistical design of experiment and multi linear
regression analysis.
Most widely used experimental plan is factorial design.
STATISTICAL DESIGN
65
66. TERMS USED
FACTOR: It is an assigned variable such as concentration ,
Temperature etc..,
Quantitative: Numerical factor assigned to it
Ex; Concentration- 1%, 2%,3% etc..
Qualitative: Which are not numerical
Ex; Polymer grade, humidity condition etc
LEVELS: Levels of a factor are the values or designations
assigned to the factor
FACTOR LEVELS
Temperature 300 , 500
Concentration 1%, 2%
66
67. RESPONSE: It is an outcome of the experiment.
It is the effect to evaluate.
Ex: Disintegration time etc..,
EFFECT: It is the change in response caused by varying the levels
It gives the relationship between various factors & levels
INTERACTION: It gives the overall effect of two or more variables
Ex: Combined effect of lubricant and glidant on hardness of the tablet
TERMS USED
67
68. Optimization by means of an experimental design may be helpful in
shortening the experimenting time.
The design of experiments is a structured , organized method used to
determine the relationship between the factors affecting a process and
the output of that process.
Statistical DOE refers to the process of planning the experiment in
such a way that appropriate data can be collected and analyzed
statistically.
TERMS USED
68
69. TYPES OF EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
Completely randomized designs
Randomized block designs
Factorial designs
Full
Fractional
Response surface designs
Central composite designs
Box-Behnken designs
Adding centre points
Three level full factorial designs
69
70. Completely randomised Designs
These experiments compares the values of a response variable based
on different levels of that primary factor.
For example ,if there are 3 levels of the primary factor with each level
to be run 2 times then there are 6 factorial possible run sequences.
Randomised block designs
For this there is one factor or variable that is of primary interest.
To control non-significant factor, an important technique called
blocking can be used to reduce or eliminate the contribution of these
factors to experimental error.
TYPES OF EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
70
71. Full: used for small set of factors
Fractional: used to examine multiple factors efficiently with fewer
runs than corresponding full factorial design
Types of fractional factorial designs
Homogenous fractional
Mixed level fractional
Box-Hunter
Plackett-Burman
Taguchi
Latin square
FACTORIAL DESIGN
71
72. Homogenous fractional
Useful when large number of factors must be screened.
Mixed level fractional
Useful when variety of factors need to be evaluated for main
effects and higher level interactions can be assumed to be
negligible.
Box-hunter
Fractional designs with factors of more than two levels can be
specified as homogenous fractional or mixed level fractional.
FACTORIAL DESIGN
72
73. PLACKETT-BURMAN
It is a popular class of screening design.
These designs are very efficient screening designs when only the
main effects are of interest.
These are useful for detecting large main effects economically
,assuming all interactions are negligible when compared with
important main effects.
Used to investigate n-1 variables in n experiments proposing
experimental designs for more than seven factors and especially
for n*4 experiments.
73
74. TAGUCHI:
It allows estimation of main effects while minimizing variance.
LATIN SQUARE:
They are special case of fractional factorial design where there is
one treatment factor of interest and two or more blocking
factors.
FACTORIAL DESIGN
74
75. RESPONSE SURFACE DESIGNS
This model has quadratic form
Designs for fitting these types of models are known as response
surface designs.
If defects and yield are the outputs and the goal is to minimize
defects and maximize yield
γ =β0 + β1X1 + β2X2 +….β11X1
2 + β22X2
2
75
76. Two most common designs generally used in this response surface
modeling are :
Central composite designs
Box-Behnken designs
Box-Wilson central composite Design
This type contains an embedded factorial or fractional factorial design
with centre points that is augmented with the group of ‘star points’.
These always contains twice as many star points as there are factors in
the design.
RESPONSE SURFACE DESIGNS
76
77. The star points represent new extreme value (low & high) for each factor in
the design.
To picture central composite design, it must imagined that there are several
factors that can vary between low and high values.
Central composite designs are of three types
Circumscribed designs-Cube points at the corners of the unit cube ,star
points along the axes at or outside the cube and centre point at origin
Inscribed designs-Star points take the value of +1 & -1 and cube points lie
in the interior of the cube
Faced –star points on the faces of the cube.
RESPONSE SURFACE DESIGNS
77
78. BOX-BEHNKEN DESIGN
They do not contain embedded factorial or fractional
factorial design.
Box-Behnken designs use just three levels of each factor.
These designs for three factors with circled point appearing
at the origin and possibly repeated for several runs.
78
79. Three-level full factorial designs
It is written as 3k factorial design.
It means that k factors are considered each at 3 levels.
These are usually referred to as low, intermediate & high
values.
These values are usually expressed as 0, 1 & 2
The third level for a continuous factor facilitates
investigation of a quadratic relationship between the
response and each of the factors.
79
80. FACTORIAL DESIGN
These are the designs of choice for simultaneous determination
of the effects of several factors & their interactions.
They are used in experiments where the effects of different
factors or conditions on experimental results are to be elucidated.
Two types
Full factorial- Used for small set of factors
Fractional factorial- for optimizing more number of factors
80
81. LEVELS OF FACTORS IN THIS FACTORIAL DESIGN
FACTOR
LOWLEVEL(mg)
HIGH LEVEL(mg)
A:stearate 0.5 1.5
B:Drug 60.0 120.0
C:starch 30.0 50.0
81
82. EXAMPLE OF FULL FACTORIAL
EXPERIMENT
Factor
combination
stearate drug starch Response
Thickness
Cm*103
(1) _ _ _ 475
a + _ _ 487
b _ + _ 421
ab + + _ 426
c _ _ + 525
ac + _ + 546
bc _ + + 472
abc + + + 522
82
83. Calculation of main effect of A (stearate)
The main effect for factor A is
{-(1)+a-b+ab-c+ac-bc+abc] 10-3
Main effect of A =
=
= 0.022 cm
4
a + ab + ac + abc
4
_ (1) + b + c + bc
4
[487 + 426 + 456 + 522 – (475 + 421 + 525 + 472)] 10-3
EXAMPLE OF FULL FACTORIAL
EXPERIMENT
83
84. GENERAL OPTIMIZATION
By the relationships are generated from experimental data ,
resulting equations are on the basis of optimization.
These equation defines response surface for the system
under investigation.
After collection of all the runs and calculated responses
,calculation of regression coefficient is initiated.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) presents the sum of the
squares used to estimate the factor main effects.
84
87. EVOLUTIONARY OPERATIONS (EVOP)
It is a method of experimental optimization.
Technique is well suited to production situations.
Small changes in the formulation or process are
made (i.e. repeats the experiment so many times)
& statistically analyzed whether it is improved.
It continues until no further changes takes place
i.e., it has reached optimum-the peak
87
88. Applied mostly to TABLETS.
Production procedure is optimized by careful
planning and constant repetition
It is impractical and expensive to use.
It is not a substitute for good laboratory scale
investigation
EVOLUTIONARY OPERATIONS (EVOP)
88
89. SIMPLEX METHOD
It is an experimental method applied for
pharmaceutical systems.
Technique has wider appeal in analytical method other
than formulation and processing.
Simplex is a geometric figure that has one more point
than the no. of factors.
It is represented by triangle.
It is determined by comparing the magnitude of the
responses after each successive calculation
89
91. The two independent variables show pump speeds for the two
reagents required in the analysis reaction.
Initial simplex is represented by lowest triangle.
The vertices represents spectrophotometric response.
The strategy is to move towards a better response by moving
away from worst response.
Applied to optimize CAPSULES, DIRECT COMPRESSION
TABLET (acetaminophen), liquid systems (physical stability)
SIMPLEX METHOD
91
92. LAGRANGIAN METHOD
It represents mathematical techniques.
It is an extension of classic method.
It is applied to a pharmaceutical formulation and processing.
This technique follows the second type of statistical design.
Limited to 2 variables - disadvantage
92
93. STEPS INVOLVED
Determine objective formulation
Determine constraints.
Change inequality constraints to equality constraints.
Form the Lagrange function F
Partially differentiate the lagrange function for each variable
& set derivatives equal to zero.
Solve the set of simultaneous equations.
Substitute the resulting values in objective functions 93
95. Polynomial models relating the response variables to independents
were generated by a backward stepwise regression analysis program.
Y= B0+B1X1+B2X2+B3 X1
2
+B4 X2
2
+B+5 X1 X2 +B6 X1X2
+ B7X1
2
+B8X1
2
X2
2
Y – response
Bi – regression coefficient for various terms containing the levels of
the independent variables.
X – independent variables
STEPS INVOLVED (EXAMPLE)
95
97. Constrained optimization problem is to locate the levels of stearic
acid (x1) and starch (x2).
This minimize the time of in-vitro release(y2),average tablet
volume(y4), average friability (y3)
To apply the lagrangian method, problem must be expressed
mathematically as follows
Y2 = f2(X1,X2) - in vitro release
Y3 = f3(X1,X2) < 2.72-Friability
Y4 = f4(x1,x2) < 0.422-avg tab.vol
LAGRANGIAN METHOD
97
102. SEARCH METHOD
It is defined by appropriate equations.
It do not require continuity or differentiability of function.
It is applied to pharmaceutical system
For optimization 2 major steps are used
Feasibility search - used to locate set of response constraints
that are just at the limit of possibility.
Grid search – experimental range is divided in to grid of
specific size & methodically searched
102
103. STEPS INVOLVED IN SEARCH METHOD
Select a system
Select variables
Perform experiments and test product
Submit data for statistical and regression analysis
Set specifications for feasibility program
Select constraints for grid search
Evaluate grid search printout
103
104. EXAMPLE
Tablet formulation
Independent variables Dependent variables
X1 Diluent ratio Y1 Disintegration time
X2 compressional force Y2 Hardness
X3 Disintegrant level Y3 Dissolution
X4 Binder level Y4 Friability
X5 Lubricant level Y5 weight uniformity
104
105. Five independent variables dictates total of 32
experiments.
This design is known as five-factor,orthagonal,central
,composite , second order design.
First 16 formulations represent a half-factorial design for
five factors at two levels .
The two levels represented by +1 & -1, analogous to high
& low values in any two level factorial.
SEARCH METHOD
105
107. Again formulations were prepared and are measured.
Then the data is subjected to statistical analysis followed by
multiple regression analysis.
The equation used in this design is second order
polynomial.
y = a0+a1x1+…+a5x5+a11x1
2
+…+a55x2
5+a12x1x2
+a13x1x3+a45 x4x5
SEARCH METHOD
107
108. A multivariant statistical technique called principle
component analysis (PCA) is used to select the best
formulation.
PCA utilizes variance-covariance matrix for the
responses involved to determine their interrelationship.
SEARCH METHOD
108
112. ADVANTAGES OF SEARCH METHOD
It takes five independent variables in to account.
Persons unfamiliar with mathematics of optimization &
with no previous computer experience could carryout an
optimization study.
112
113. CANONICALANALYSIS
It is a technique used to reduce a second order
regression equation.
This allows immediate interpretation of the
regression equation by including the linear and
interaction terms in constant term.
113
114. It is used to reduce second order regression equation to an
equation consisting of a constant and squared terms as
follows.
It was described as an efficient method to explore an
empherical response.
Y = Y0 +λ1W1
2 + λ2W2
2 +..
CANONICALANALYSIS
114