This document discusses mucoadhesion and bioadhesive drug delivery systems. It defines mucoadhesion as the ability of a material to adhere to a biological tissue for an extended period of time. There are several types of bioadhesive drug delivery systems depending on the route of administration, including buccal, sublingual, vaginal, rectal, nasal, ocular, and gastrointestinal systems. Mucoadhesion occurs through a complex mechanism involving theories such as electronic, wetting, diffusion, fracture, cohesive, adsorption, and mechanical theories. Key factors affecting mucoadhesion are polymer properties, environmental factors, and physiological factors.
Approaches Of Gastro-Retentive Drug Delivery System or GRDDSAkshayPatane
Approaches Of Gastro-Retentive Drug Delivery System
Includes:
Floating and Non-Floating drug delivery system with their subtypes
Like Non-effervescent system, Effervescent system, Raft forming system,
High Density system, Expandable system, Muco-adhesive system,
Super porous hydrogel system and Magnetic Systems, etc.
Mucoadhesive drug delivery system interact with the mucus layer covering the mucosal epithelial surface, & mucin molecules & increase the residence time of the dosage form at the site of the absorption.
Mucoadhesive drug delivery system is a part of controlled delivery system.
Since the early 1980,the concept of Mucoadhesion has gained considerable interest in pharmaceutical technology.
combine mucoadhesive with enzyme inhibitory & penetration enhancer properties & improve the patient complaince.
MDDS have been devloped for buccal ,nasal,rectal &vaginal routes for both systemic & local effects.
Hydrophilic high mol. wt. such as peptides that cannot be administered & poor absorption ,then MDDS is best choice.
Mucoadhesiveinner layers called mucosa inner epithelial cell lining is covered with viscoelasticfluid
Composed of water and mucin.
Thickness varies from 40 μm to 300 μm
General composition of mucus
Water…………………………………..95%
Glycoproteinsand lipids……………..0.5-5%
Mineral salts……………………………1%
Free proteins…………………………..0.5-1%
The mechanism responsible in the formation of mucoadhesive bond
Step 1 : Wetting and swelling of the polymer(contact stage)
Step 2 : Interpenetration between the polymer chains and the mucosal membrane
Step 3 : Formation of bonds between the entangled chains (both known as consolidation stage)
Electronic theory
Wetting theory
Adsorption theory
Diffusion theory
Fracture theory
Advantages over other controlled oral controlled release systems by virtue of prolongation of residence of drug in GIT.
Targeting & localization of the dosage form at a specific site
-Painless administration.
-Low enzymatic activity & avoid of first pass metabolism
If MDDS are adhere too tightlgy because it is undesirable to exert too much force to remove the formulation after use,otherwise the mucosa could be injured.
-Some patient suffers unpleasent feeling.
-Unfortunately ,the lack of standardized techniques often leads to unclear results.
-costly drug delivery system
Approaches Of Gastro-Retentive Drug Delivery System or GRDDSAkshayPatane
Approaches Of Gastro-Retentive Drug Delivery System
Includes:
Floating and Non-Floating drug delivery system with their subtypes
Like Non-effervescent system, Effervescent system, Raft forming system,
High Density system, Expandable system, Muco-adhesive system,
Super porous hydrogel system and Magnetic Systems, etc.
Mucoadhesive drug delivery system interact with the mucus layer covering the mucosal epithelial surface, & mucin molecules & increase the residence time of the dosage form at the site of the absorption.
Mucoadhesive drug delivery system is a part of controlled delivery system.
Since the early 1980,the concept of Mucoadhesion has gained considerable interest in pharmaceutical technology.
combine mucoadhesive with enzyme inhibitory & penetration enhancer properties & improve the patient complaince.
MDDS have been devloped for buccal ,nasal,rectal &vaginal routes for both systemic & local effects.
Hydrophilic high mol. wt. such as peptides that cannot be administered & poor absorption ,then MDDS is best choice.
Mucoadhesiveinner layers called mucosa inner epithelial cell lining is covered with viscoelasticfluid
Composed of water and mucin.
Thickness varies from 40 μm to 300 μm
General composition of mucus
Water…………………………………..95%
Glycoproteinsand lipids……………..0.5-5%
Mineral salts……………………………1%
Free proteins…………………………..0.5-1%
The mechanism responsible in the formation of mucoadhesive bond
Step 1 : Wetting and swelling of the polymer(contact stage)
Step 2 : Interpenetration between the polymer chains and the mucosal membrane
Step 3 : Formation of bonds between the entangled chains (both known as consolidation stage)
Electronic theory
Wetting theory
Adsorption theory
Diffusion theory
Fracture theory
Advantages over other controlled oral controlled release systems by virtue of prolongation of residence of drug in GIT.
Targeting & localization of the dosage form at a specific site
-Painless administration.
-Low enzymatic activity & avoid of first pass metabolism
If MDDS are adhere too tightlgy because it is undesirable to exert too much force to remove the formulation after use,otherwise the mucosa could be injured.
-Some patient suffers unpleasent feeling.
-Unfortunately ,the lack of standardized techniques often leads to unclear results.
-costly drug delivery system
Controlled Release Oral Drug Delivery System
Controlled drug delivery is one which delivers the drug at a predetermined rate, for locally or systemically, for a specified period of time.
Adhesion describes the attractive forces between a biological material and mucus or mucous membrane. 1. Mucous membranes adhere to epithelial surfaces such as the gastrointestinal tract (GI-tract), the vagina, the lung, the eye, etc. They are generally hydrophilic as they contain many hydrogen macromolecules due to the large amount of water (approximately 95%) within its composition. However, mucin also contains glycoproteins that enable the formation of a gel-like substance. 1. Understanding the hydrophilic bonding and adhesion mechanisms of mucus to biological material is of utmost importance in order to produce the most efficient applications. For example, in drug delivery systems, the mucus layer must be penetrated in order to effectively transport micro- or nanosized drug particles into the body. 2 Bioadhesion is the mechanism by which two biological materials are held together by interfacial forces.
Controlled Release Oral Drug Delivery System
Controlled drug delivery is one which delivers the drug at a predetermined rate, for locally or systemically, for a specified period of time.
Adhesion describes the attractive forces between a biological material and mucus or mucous membrane. 1. Mucous membranes adhere to epithelial surfaces such as the gastrointestinal tract (GI-tract), the vagina, the lung, the eye, etc. They are generally hydrophilic as they contain many hydrogen macromolecules due to the large amount of water (approximately 95%) within its composition. However, mucin also contains glycoproteins that enable the formation of a gel-like substance. 1. Understanding the hydrophilic bonding and adhesion mechanisms of mucus to biological material is of utmost importance in order to produce the most efficient applications. For example, in drug delivery systems, the mucus layer must be penetrated in order to effectively transport micro- or nanosized drug particles into the body. 2 Bioadhesion is the mechanism by which two biological materials are held together by interfacial forces.
The all the content in this profile is completed by the teachers, students as well as other health care peoples.
thank you, all the respected peoples, for giving the information to complete this presentation.
this information is free to use by anyone.
Introduction to Mucosal Drug Delivery SystemsAshwiniRaikar1
Introduction, Principle of bioadhesion or mucoadhesion, concepts, advantaged and disadvantages, transmucosal permeability and formulation consideration of buccal delivery systems.
Buccal drug delivery system is part of mucoadhesive drug delivery system and their principal and formulation ,mechanisam of adhesion to mucosa ,use of polymers in BDDS and permiability enhancers and evaluation parameters of buccal tablets and patchs
Avoid first pass effect,
Mucoadhesive drug delivery system has gained interest among pharmaceutical scientists as a means of promoting dosage form residence time as well as improving intimacy of contact with various absorptive membranes of the bio- logical system
Formulation and invitro evaluation of microspheresTejaswi Kurma
basic review on microspheres.graphics is used so derz slide within a slide ie...slides which find overlapped download for watching overlaped slides for better view
An overview of Bio/Mucoadhesive drug delivery system covering various aspects like advantages, approaches, mechanism of mucoadhesion, various theories, various testing methods and examples of marketed preparations.
Mucosal Drug Delivery Systems: Targeting Medication Through Mucous Membranes
Mucosal drug delivery systems (MDDS) offer a unique approach to medication administration by delivering drugs directly to mucosal membranes. These membranes line various body cavities, such as the mouth, nose, lungs, eyes, vagina, and gastrointestinal tract. By bypassing the traditional oral route and its associated challenges, MDDS can offer several advantages:
Benefits:
Rapid onset of action: Drugs quickly access the bloodstream through the thin mucosal membranes, leading to a faster therapeutic effect compared to oral medications.
Improved bioavailability: Avoiding first-pass metabolism in the liver can significantly increase the amount of drug available to the body.
Enhanced patient compliance: Non-invasive routes like nasal or buccal delivery can be more comfortable and convenient than injections or tablets.
Targeted delivery: Specific formulations can target diseases affecting specific mucosal membranes, reducing systemic exposure and potential side effects.
Potential for controlled release: Sustained release formulations can maintain therapeutic drug levels for longer periods.
Different types of MDDS:
Buccal: Films, tablets, or patches adhere to the inner cheek for local or systemic delivery.
Sublingual: Tablets placed under the tongue dissolve rapidly for systemic absorption.
Nasal: Sprays, drops, or gels deliver drugs directly to the nasal cavity for respiratory or systemic effects.
Ocular: Drops, inserts, or films provide sustained or targeted delivery to the eye.
Vaginal: Rings, creams, or tablets deliver medication locally or systemically through the vaginal mucosa.
Pulmonary: Inhaled aerosols or solutions deposit drugs in the lungs for respiratory conditions.
Rectal: Suppositories or enemas release medication locally or systemically through the rectal mucosa.
Challenges and considerations:
Mucosal barriers: Mucus and tight junctions within the membranes can limit drug penetration.
Formulation challenges: Designing formulations that adhere to mucosal membranes, release drugs effectively, and are stable can be complex.
Potential for irritation: Some formulations can irritate sensitive mucosal tissues.
Limited drug suitability: Not all drugs are suitable for MDDS due to factors like size, stability, and absorption properties.
Future of MDDS:
Advances in bio adhesive materials, drug targeting strategies, and controlled release technologies are expected to expand the capabilities and applications of MDDS. Personalized medicine approaches using tailored mucosal formulations hold promise for further optimizing treatment efficacy and patient comfort.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
Bio Adhesive Drug Delivery System
1.
2. Introduction
• Definition : Adhesion can be defined as the bond produced
by contact between a pressure - sensitive adhesive and a
surface.
• Ability to stick,adhere or hold
• Bioadhesion is defined as an ability of a material to adhere
to a biological tissue for an extended period of time In the
case of polymer attached to the mucin layer of a mucosal
tissue, the term “mucoadhesion” is used.
3. Different routes of targeting Bdds
They are :1)Buccal
delivery system
2)Sub lingual
delivery system
Depending upon 3)Vaginal delivery
the route of system
Types of Drug administration of 4)Rectal delivery
delivery systems: the mucoadhesive system
drugs they are 5)Nasal delivery
different types . system
6)Ocular delivery
system
7)Gastro intestinal
delivery system
4. MECHANISM OF MUCOADHESION
Mucoadhesive Inner layers called mucosa Inner epithelial
Cell lining Covered with viscoelastic fluid.
Secreted by Goblet cells Composed of water and mucin (an
anionic polyelectrolyte ) Other components include proteins,
lipids and mucopolysaccharides ,electrolytes
Thickness varies from ≈40–50 μm to ≈300 μm
Mucus is composed mainly of Water (>95%) Glycoproteins
of exceptionally high molecular weight Mineral salts -1 %
Free proteins – 0.5 to 1%
7. Factors affecting Mucoadhesion
Polymer related factors:
Molecular weight
Concentration of active polymer
Flexibility of polymer chains
Environment related factors :
pH of polymer - substrate interface
Applied strength
Initial contact time
Swelling
Physiological factors:
mucin trun over
Disease state
8. Theories of mucoadhesion
The Theories include :-
(a) The electronic theory.
(b) The wetting theory.
(c) The adsorption theory.
(d) The diffusion theory.
(e) The mechanical theory.
(f) The cohesive theory.
(g) Fracture theory.
The phenomena of bioadhesion occurs by a complex
mechanism .There are seven theories have been proposed
till date
9. Electronic theory: Proposes transfer of electrons amongst the
surfaces due to difference in their electrical structure resulting in the
formation of an electrical double layer thereby giving rise to attractive
forces.
Wetting theory: Postulates that if the contact angle of liquids on the
substrate surface is lower, then there is a greater affinity for the liquid
to the substrate surface.
If two such substrate surfaces are brought in contact with each other in
the presence of the liquid, the liquid may act as an adhesive amongst
the substrate surfaces.
10. The diffusion theory: Assumes the diffusion of the polymer chains,
present on the substrate surfaces, across the adhesive interface
thereby forming a networked , semipermeable structure. The
extent depth to which the polymer chain penetrate the mucus
depend on diffusion coefficient &time of contact .
11. Fracture theory : This theory attempts to relete the difficulty of
separation of two surfaces after adhesion .
Adhesion Strength = (E ԑ/L )1/2
E =Young’s modulus of elasticity
ԑ = Fracture energy
L = Critical crack length when two surfaces are separated
12. Cohesive theory :proposes that the phenomena of bioadhesion
are mainly due to the intermolecular interactions amongst like-
molecules.
Mechanical theory :explains the diffusion of the liquid adhesives
into the micro-cracks and irregularities present on the substrate
surface thereby forming an interlocked structure which gives rise
to adhesion. Surface roughness =d/h
Adsorption theory:After initial contact of the material adhere to
surface due to forces acting between the atoms in the two
surfaces later result in formation of bonds(primary & secondary)
due to the presence of intermolecular forces.
hydrogen bonding and Van der Waal’s forces, for the adhesive
interaction amongst the substrate surfaces.
13. Mechanisms of Bioadhesion :The mechanisms responsible in
the formation of bioadhesive bonds are not fully known,
however most research has described bioadhesive bond
formation as a three step process.
Step1: Wetting and swelling of polymer
Step2: Interpenetration between the polymer chains and the
mucosal membrane
Step3: Formation of chemical bonds between the entangled
chains.
Process of bioadhesion can be classified,
Chemical (electronic and adsorption theories)
Physical (wetting, Diffusion and cohesive theory)
16. Bio/muco-adhesive systems: bind to the gastric epithelial cell
surface or mucin, which extends the GRT of drug delivery system
in the stomach.
The ability to provide adhesion of a drug delivery system to the
gastrointestinal wall provides longer residence time in a particular
organ site, thereby producing an improved effect in terms of local
action or systemic effect.
Binding of polymers to the mucin/epithelial surface can be
divided into three categories:
1. Hydration-mediated adhesion:Certain hydrophilic polymers
tend to imbibe large amount of water and become sticky, thereby
acquiring bioadhesive properties.
17. 2. Bonding-mediated adhesion:The adhesion of polymers to a
mucus/epithelial cell surface involves various bonding
mechanisms.
Physical-mechanical bonds can result from the insertion of the
adhesive material into the folds or crevices of the mucosa.
Chemical bonds may be either covalent (primary) or ionic
(secondary) in nature.
Secondary chemical bonds consist of dispersive interactions (i.e.,
Vander Waals interactions) and stronger specific interactions such
as hydrogen bonds.
3. Receptor-mediated adhesion: Certain polymers bind to specific
receptor sites on the cell surfaces, thereby enhancing the gastric
retention of dosage forms.
Various investigators have proposed different mucin-polymer
interactions, such as:
18. Wetting and swelling of the polymer to permit intimate contact
with the biological tissue.
Interpenetration of bioadhesive polymer chains and entanglement
of polymer and mucin chains.
Formation of weak chemical bonds.
Sufficient polymer mobility to allow spreading.
Water transport followed by mucosal dehydration .
The bioadhesive coated system when comes in contact with the
mucus layer, various non-specific or specific interactions occurs
between the complimentary structures and these interactions last
only until the turnover process of mucin
the drug delivery system should release its drug contents during
this limited adhesion time, in order for a bioadhesive system to be
successful.
21. Characteristics of Bioadhesive polymers
Flexibility- important because it controls the extent of the
interpenetration between the polymers and mucosal/epithelial
surfaces.
Hydrophilicity – Polymers that are hydrophilic in nature are able
to form strong adhesive bonds with mucosal membranes because
the mucus layer contains large amounts of water.
Hydrogen bonding – Hydrogen bonding between the entangled
polymer chains forms strong adhesive bonds, therefore the
presence of hydrogen bond – forming groups such as OH and
COOH groups are vital in large quantities.
High molecular weight – Polymers with a high molecular weight
are desirable because they provide more bonding sites.
Surface tensions – Surface tensions are needed to spread the
bioadhesive polymer into the mucosal layer epithelial surface.
22. CHARACTERISTICS OF AN IDEAL MUCOADHESIVE POLYMER
Rapid adherence to mucosa.
Exhibit strong interaction with the mucin epithelial tissue.
Minimum impact on drug release.
Good spreadability, wetting, swelling and solubility and
biodegradability properties.
Unaffected by the hydrodynamic conditions, food and pH
changes.
Easy to incorporate in various dosage forms.
Possess peel, tensile and shear strengths at the bioadhesive range.
Show bioadhesive properties in both dry and liquid state.
Demonstrate local enzyme inhibition and penetration
enhancement properties.
23. Bioadhesion and drug absorption
Drug absorption is the process by which a drug leaves its site of
administration and enters the general circulation.
A drug has to cross several cell membranes before reaching its
target tissue or organ.
These membranes act as barriers which control the transport of
drugs and other molecules across cells.
The general structure of a cell/plasma membrane consists of a
matrix of proteins surrounded by a phospholipid bilayer.
Drugs may cross a cell membrane by passive diffusion, facilitated
passive diffusion, active transport or pinocytosis.
Drug absorption is determined by physicochemical properties of
drugs, their formulations (e.g. tablet,capsule,solution) and routes
of administration such as oral, parenteral and rectal.
24. i)Passive Diffusion:Diffusion is the tendency of molecules to
spread into an available
ii)Facilitated passive diffusion:This is when molecules are
transported across membranes cells with the help of carrier
proteins.
iii)Active Transport:it is the movement of molecules and ions
against their concentration gradients, from lower to higher
concentrations.
iv)Pinocytosis:Pinocytosis (a form of endocytosis) allows a cell to
engulf large molecules and fluid that may be present in the
extracellular region.
Pinocytosis plays a role in the transport of protein drugs.
25. Passive Diffusion Facilitated passive diffusion
Active Transport
Pinocytosis
27. TECHNIQUES FOR EVALUATING BIOADHESIVE
PROPERTIES
INVITRO STUDIES
1) Tensile stress measurement
a) Wilhelmy plate technique: The Wilhelmy plate technique is
traditionally used for the measurement of dynamic contact
angles. The instrument measures the bioadhesive force
between mucosal tissue and the dosage form .
By using the CAHN software system, parameters such as
fracture strength, deformation to failure and work of adhesion
can be analysed.
28. b)Electromagnetic force transducer (EMFT): uses a calibrated
electromagnet to detach a magnetic loaded polymer DDS from a
tissue sample .
It has the unique ability to record remotely and simultaneously
the tensile force information as well as high magnification video
images of bioadhesive interactions at near physiological
conditions.
EMFT measures tissue adhesive forces by monitoring the
magnetic force required to exactly oppose the bioadhesive force.
29. 2)Shear stress measurement:The shear stress technique measures the
force that causes a mucoadhesive to slide with respect to the mucous
layer in a direction parallel to their plane of contact .
o Adhesion tests based on the shear stress measurement involve two
glass slides coated with polymer and a film of mucus.
o Mucus forms a thin film between the two polymer coated slides, and
the test measures the force required to separate the two surfaces.
3)Rheological approach:The rheological properties of the
mucoadhesive interface (i.e. of the hydrated gel) are influenced by the
occurrence of interpenetration step in the process of bioadhesion.
30. o Chain interlocking, conformational changes and chemical interaction,
which occur between bioadhesive polymer and mucin chains, produce
changes in the rheological behaviour of the two macromolecular species.
4)Colloidal gold staining method:This technique employs red colloidal
gold particles, which are stabilized by the adsorbed mucin molecule by
forming mucin–gold conjugates .
o Upon interaction with mucin–gold conjugates, bioadhesive hydrogels
develop a red colour on the surface.
o Thus, the interaction between them can easily be quantified, either by
the measurement of the intensity of the red colour on the hydrogel
surface or by the measurement of the decrease in the concentration of
the conjugates from the absorbance changes at 525 nm.
31. 5)Viscometeric method:A simple viscometric method was used to
quantify mucin–polymer bioadhesive bond strength Viscosities of 15
%w/v porcine gastric mucin dispersion in 0.1M HCl (pH 1) or 0.1M
acetate buffer (pH 5.5) were measured with a Brookefield viscometer
in the absence or presence of selected neutral, anionic, and cationic
polymers.
Viscosity components and the forces of bioadhesion were calculated.
6)Fluorescent probe method:Park and Robinson studied polymer
interaction with the conjunctival epithelial cell membrane using
fluorescent probes .
The study was done in an attempt to understand structural
requirements for bioadhesion in order to design improved bioadhesive
polymers for oral use.
32. The membrane lipid bilayer and membrane proteins were labelled
with pyrene and fluorescein isothiocyanate, respectively.
The cells were then mixed with candidate bioadhesive, and the
changes in fluorescence spectra were monitored.
This gave a direct indication of polymer binding and its influence
on polymer adhesion.
33.
34. INVIVO TECHNIQUES
GI transit using radio-opaque technique:It involves the use of
radio-opaque markers, e.g., barium sulfate, encapsulated in
bioadhesive DDS to determine the effects of bioadhesive polymers
on GI transit time.
Faeces collection (using an automated faeces collection machine)
and x-ray inspection provide a non-invasive method of
monitoring total GI residence time without affecting normal GI
motility.
Mucoadhesives labelled with Cr-51, Tc-99m, In-113m, or I-123 have been
used to study the transit of the DDS in the GI tract .
Gamma scintigraphy technique:It is a valuable tool used in the
development of pharmaceutical dosage forms.
With this methodology, it is possible to obtain information non-
invasively.
35. o This technique gives information in terms of:
o oral dosage forms across the different regions of GI
tract
o the time and site of disintegration of dosage forms
o the site of drug absorption
o also the effect of food
o disease
o size of the dosage form on the in vivo performance of
the dosage forms.
36. Advantages :
Mucoadhesive dosage forms have three distinct advantages when
compared to conventional dosage forms.
These dosage forms are readily localized in the region applied to
improve and enhance the bioavailability of drugs.
These dosage forms facilitate intimate contact of the formulation
with the underlying absorption surface.
This allows modification of tissue permeability for absorption of
macromolecules ,such as peptides and proteins.
Mucoadhesive dosage forms also prolong the residence time of the
dosage form at the site of application and absorption to permit
once or twice a day dosing.
37. Disadvantages :
Medications administered orally do not enter the blood stream
immediately after passage through the buccal mucosa.
Instead they have to be swallowed and then have to pass through a
portion of the GIT before being absorbed.
So the action is not very rapid in the GIT as compared when the
drug is administered through buccal route.
Many drugs affect liver metabolism and also cause destruction via
first pass metabolism of other drugs.
One of the side effects of many antibiotics is the destruction of
normal GI flora resulting in diarrhea.
The absorption of mucoadhesive drugs is adversely affected by the
presence of food.
Tetracyclines, in particular, complicates the administration of this
class of antibiotics via the oral route.
Mucoadhesive drugs cannot bypass liver metabolism.
38. CONCLUSION
Improvements in bioadhesive-based drug delivery and, in
particular, the delivery of novel, highly-effective and mucosa-
compatible polymer, are creating new commercial and clinical
opportunities for delivering narrow absorption window drugs at
the target sites to maximise their usefulness.
Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems are being studied from
different angles, including development of novel mucoadhesives,
design of the device, mechanisms of mucoadhesion and
permeation enhancement.
39. REFERENCES
o Chickering DE, Mathiowitz E. Definitions mechanisms and theories of
bioadhesion. In: Mathiowitz E, Chickering DE, Lehr CM (eds).
Bioadhesive drug delivery systems: Fundamentals, novel approaches,
and developments, New York: Marcel Dekker, 1999, pp 1–10.
o Ahuja A, Khar RK, Ali J. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Drug Dev
Ind Pharm, 1997; 23 (5): 489–515.
o Park K, Robinson JR. Bioadhesive polymers as platforms for oral
controlled drug delivery: method to study bioadhesion. Int J Pharm,
1984; 19: 107–127.
o Smart JD, Kellaway IW, Worthington HEC. An in vitro investigation of
mucosa-adhesive materials for use in controlled drug delivery. J
Pharm Pharmacol, 1984; 36: 295–299.
o Peppas NA, Buri P. Surface, interfacial and molecular aspects of
polymer bioadhesion on soft tissues. J Control Release, 1985; 2: 257–
275