SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 14
FMP Evaluation
Jacob
Production Process Evaluation
Research
• I think that the strengths of my research are that I searched for older types
of football games, ones that are predominantly top down/birds eye view.
The way this helped my product was the fact that I took the old school
look from my research and used it in my work.
• I do think that the weaknesses for my work will be how I made the layout
for my work I reckon I could have put more effort into my describing and
labelling. The effect this would have on my product would make it a lot
more detailed and more professional.
Planning
• I think that the strengths on my planning where that I gathered the necessary
information for my planning and put it all together in an order that then give an
idea about what the project will turn out to look like.
• Some things that I could have vastly improved on would be the mood board since I
didn’t put much into it and it doesn’t give much of an idea to what my work could
look like.
• The effect that this would have on my work would have probably given me more
ideas and for my actual project and it would have helped me plan it more ahead of
time.
Time Management
• I don’t think that I managed my time very well since I had the project
over lap with my next project. I also think that my project could have
been improved by having more time, since I could have perfected the
whole free kick and the animation I could have made it longer.
• I think I would have probably made the actual animated image bigger
and I think I would have made the animation longer and have more
action.
Technical
Qualities
• Some similarities from both images are that they both use the top
down view onto the pitch which then lets you see the whole pitch and its players in
action.
• The scoreboards are both in the same position, and both colour
coordinated to show the colour of the teams.
• Some differences are that the bottom image has more information to
do with the game going on, ECT. You can change the speed of the match
and see all stats from the players and the leagues.
• Although my project is pixelated and the other image isn't I think that It
gives mine a retro feeling to it
Aesthetic Qualities
• I believe that the one true thing that I like about the project is the way the box is
set out for the animated free kick since its laid out as if it was a real freekick from a
match.
• I do also believe that I could have set out the whole pitch better by including the
entire pitch instead of just having one side of it.
Audience Appeal
• I believe that I have appealed towards my audience because the
whole football pitch/ football manager view fits in with the audience I
had to appeal to.
• I also believe that with the football box and the freekick appeals to my
audience since it has a lot to do with football.
Peer
Feedback
Feedback 1
• What did you like about the product?
– I liked the whole aspect of subutio/football
manager since it has the top down style to the
product
• What improvements could have been made to
the product? I believe it could have been
made longer for more entertainment.
Feedback 2
• What did you like about the product?
– I liked the freekick and the style used since it was
pixelated.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product? The pitch could have been made
longer and to full scale.
Feedback 3
• What did you like about the product?
– I like the use of colour and size with only showing one
side of the pitch giving importance to one side
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
• I think that some improvements could be the size
of the player models could be bigger so its easier
to see some of the players.
Peer Feedback Summary
• What do you agree with from your peer
feedback?
– I agree that I should have made the pitch bigger so
you can see the whole thing a lot easier and also
making the actual project longer so its not just a
freekick it could be say the second half of the match
• What do you disagree with from your peer
feedback?
• I disagree with the size of the player models
needing to be bigger so people can see them
better.
Peer Feedback Summary
• Some changes that I would make would be to
make the pitch bigger so there is more to look
at and also to make the actual game longer so
its not just a freekick that you see. The
reasons for this is so its more visually
interesting for the audience also it would give
the audience a better idea of what the end
game would look and play like.

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)
 
Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3
 
7. evaluation (lf) Interactive
7. evaluation (lf) Interactive7. evaluation (lf) Interactive
7. evaluation (lf) Interactive
 
7. evaluation done
7. evaluation done7. evaluation done
7. evaluation done
 
7. evaluation (interactive) (1) for top pizza
7. evaluation (interactive) (1) for top pizza7. evaluation (interactive) (1) for top pizza
7. evaluation (interactive) (1) for top pizza
 
7. evaluation (hack & slash)
7. evaluation (hack & slash)7. evaluation (hack & slash)
7. evaluation (hack & slash)
 
5. evaluation(1)
5. evaluation(1)5. evaluation(1)
5. evaluation(1)
 
Peer feedback
Peer feedbackPeer feedback
Peer feedback
 
7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)
 
8. evaluation
8. evaluation8. evaluation
8. evaluation
 
7. evaluation(2)
7. evaluation(2)7. evaluation(2)
7. evaluation(2)
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
7. evaluation (interactive)
7. evaluation (interactive)7. evaluation (interactive)
7. evaluation (interactive)
 
7. evaluation(3) done
7. evaluation(3) done7. evaluation(3) done
7. evaluation(3) done
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
5. pre production (jrw) visual
5. pre production (jrw) visual5. pre production (jrw) visual
5. pre production (jrw) visual
 
7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)
 

Similar to 7. evaluation(7) interactive (20)

7. Evaluation (Interactive).pptx
7. Evaluation (Interactive).pptx7. Evaluation (Interactive).pptx
7. Evaluation (Interactive).pptx
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
7. evaluation(2)
7. evaluation(2)7. evaluation(2)
7. evaluation(2)
 
7. evaluation (js)
7. evaluation (js)7. evaluation (js)
7. evaluation (js)
 
7. Evaluation
7. Evaluation7. Evaluation
7. Evaluation
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
7. evaluation(2)
7. evaluation(2)7. evaluation(2)
7. evaluation(2)
 
7. evaluation unit 4
7. evaluation unit 47. evaluation unit 4
7. evaluation unit 4
 
L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template
L3 cmpt y2 evaluation templateL3 cmpt y2 evaluation template
L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template
 
7. Evaluation (Interactive) (17).pptx
7. Evaluation (Interactive) (17).pptx7. Evaluation (Interactive) (17).pptx
7. Evaluation (Interactive) (17).pptx
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
7. Evaluation (Interactive) copy.pptx 1.pptx
7. Evaluation (Interactive) copy.pptx 1.pptx7. Evaluation (Interactive) copy.pptx 1.pptx
7. Evaluation (Interactive) copy.pptx 1.pptx
 
7. evaluation(4) (1)
7. evaluation(4) (1)7. evaluation(4) (1)
7. evaluation(4) (1)
 
7. evaluation(2)
7. evaluation(2)7. evaluation(2)
7. evaluation(2)
 
7. evaluation(2)
7. evaluation(2)7. evaluation(2)
7. evaluation(2)
 
unit 3 evaluation
unit 3  evaluationunit 3  evaluation
unit 3 evaluation
 
7. evaluation complete
7. evaluation complete7. evaluation complete
7. evaluation complete
 
Pod handler(1)
Pod handler(1)Pod handler(1)
Pod handler(1)
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)
 

More from JacobLindley1

More from JacobLindley1 (20)

7.evaluation(9)
7.evaluation(9)7.evaluation(9)
7.evaluation(9)
 
6.production reflection(3)
6.production reflection(3)6.production reflection(3)
6.production reflection(3)
 
5. pre production(3)1
5. pre production(3)15. pre production(3)1
5. pre production(3)1
 
4. proposal(3)1
4. proposal(3)14. proposal(3)1
4. proposal(3)1
 
3. production experiments(3) done1
3. production experiments(3) done13. production experiments(3) done1
3. production experiments(3) done1
 
2. research(3) done
2. research(3) done2. research(3) done
2. research(3) done
 
1. initial plans(3) done
1. initial plans(3) done1. initial plans(3) done
1. initial plans(3) done
 
6. production reflection(2)
6. production reflection(2)6. production reflection(2)
6. production reflection(2)
 
5. pre production(2) (1)
5. pre production(2) (1)5. pre production(2) (1)
5. pre production(2) (1)
 
4. proposal(2) (1)
4. proposal(2) (1)4. proposal(2) (1)
4. proposal(2) (1)
 
3. production experiments(2)
3. production experiments(2)3. production experiments(2)
3. production experiments(2)
 
1. initial plans interactive project
1. initial plans interactive project1. initial plans interactive project
1. initial plans interactive project
 
2. research(2)
2. research(2)2. research(2)
2. research(2)
 
Theory audience pro-forma
Theory  audience pro-formaTheory  audience pro-forma
Theory audience pro-forma
 
Theory meaning pro-forma
Theory  meaning pro-formaTheory  meaning pro-forma
Theory meaning pro-forma
 
Theory research pro-forma
Theory  research pro-formaTheory  research pro-forma
Theory research pro-forma
 
2. production techniques evaluation pro forma v2
2. production techniques evaluation pro forma v22. production techniques evaluation pro forma v2
2. production techniques evaluation pro forma v2
 
1. communication methods pro format first draft
1. communication methods pro format first draft1. communication methods pro format first draft
1. communication methods pro format first draft
 
3. formal proposal 2
3. formal proposal 23. formal proposal 2
3. formal proposal 2
 
3. formal proposal
3. formal proposal3. formal proposal
3. formal proposal
 

Recently uploaded

Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
PECB
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
kauryashika82
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
QucHHunhnh
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
ciinovamais
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
 
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
 
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
 
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
 
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin ClassesMixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
 
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
 

7. evaluation(7) interactive

  • 3. Research • I think that the strengths of my research are that I searched for older types of football games, ones that are predominantly top down/birds eye view. The way this helped my product was the fact that I took the old school look from my research and used it in my work. • I do think that the weaknesses for my work will be how I made the layout for my work I reckon I could have put more effort into my describing and labelling. The effect this would have on my product would make it a lot more detailed and more professional.
  • 4. Planning • I think that the strengths on my planning where that I gathered the necessary information for my planning and put it all together in an order that then give an idea about what the project will turn out to look like. • Some things that I could have vastly improved on would be the mood board since I didn’t put much into it and it doesn’t give much of an idea to what my work could look like. • The effect that this would have on my work would have probably given me more ideas and for my actual project and it would have helped me plan it more ahead of time.
  • 5. Time Management • I don’t think that I managed my time very well since I had the project over lap with my next project. I also think that my project could have been improved by having more time, since I could have perfected the whole free kick and the animation I could have made it longer. • I think I would have probably made the actual animated image bigger and I think I would have made the animation longer and have more action.
  • 6. Technical Qualities • Some similarities from both images are that they both use the top down view onto the pitch which then lets you see the whole pitch and its players in action. • The scoreboards are both in the same position, and both colour coordinated to show the colour of the teams. • Some differences are that the bottom image has more information to do with the game going on, ECT. You can change the speed of the match and see all stats from the players and the leagues. • Although my project is pixelated and the other image isn't I think that It gives mine a retro feeling to it
  • 7. Aesthetic Qualities • I believe that the one true thing that I like about the project is the way the box is set out for the animated free kick since its laid out as if it was a real freekick from a match. • I do also believe that I could have set out the whole pitch better by including the entire pitch instead of just having one side of it.
  • 8. Audience Appeal • I believe that I have appealed towards my audience because the whole football pitch/ football manager view fits in with the audience I had to appeal to. • I also believe that with the football box and the freekick appeals to my audience since it has a lot to do with football.
  • 10. Feedback 1 • What did you like about the product? – I liked the whole aspect of subutio/football manager since it has the top down style to the product • What improvements could have been made to the product? I believe it could have been made longer for more entertainment.
  • 11. Feedback 2 • What did you like about the product? – I liked the freekick and the style used since it was pixelated. • What improvements could have been made to the product? The pitch could have been made longer and to full scale.
  • 12. Feedback 3 • What did you like about the product? – I like the use of colour and size with only showing one side of the pitch giving importance to one side • What improvements could have been made to the product? • I think that some improvements could be the size of the player models could be bigger so its easier to see some of the players.
  • 13. Peer Feedback Summary • What do you agree with from your peer feedback? – I agree that I should have made the pitch bigger so you can see the whole thing a lot easier and also making the actual project longer so its not just a freekick it could be say the second half of the match • What do you disagree with from your peer feedback? • I disagree with the size of the player models needing to be bigger so people can see them better.
  • 14. Peer Feedback Summary • Some changes that I would make would be to make the pitch bigger so there is more to look at and also to make the actual game longer so its not just a freekick that you see. The reasons for this is so its more visually interesting for the audience also it would give the audience a better idea of what the end game would look and play like.

Editor's Notes

  1. What were the strengths of your research? How did your research help your product? What were the weaknesses of your research? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
  2. What were the strengths of your planning? How did your planning help your product? What were the weaknesses of your planning? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
  3. Did you manage your time well? Did you complete your project on time or would your products have improved with additional time? What would you have done if you had more time to produce your work?
  4. Compare your work to similar existing products and discuss the similarities and differences Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page alongside an existing product Use text boxes and arrows
  5. Does your work look good? Was it creative? What aspects of your game’s visuals do you like? What would you improve? How would you improve it? Discuss the strengths and weaknesses Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page and analyse them Use text boxes and arrows
  6. How have you appealed to your target audience? What specific bits of content would appeal to your target audience. Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page and analyse them Use text boxes and arrows
  7. What changes would you make to your product based upon your peer feedback and why?