SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 14
FMP Evaluation
Your name
Production Process Evaluation
Research
• I think the strengths of my research is that I used ideas from three different games. This
allowed my game to have a range of features and ideas so that it attracted a large target
audience instead of one small specific audience. I think another strength of my research is
that because my game has a range of different features it makes it different and stand out
from all other competitors. This gives my product an advantage in the market and attracting
the audience.
• I think my research helped my product because it allowed me to create my actual game
quickly instead of thinking of ideas while I make it. This meant that I was able to have time to
go back over my work and change anything I need to without going over my dead line.
• I think the weaknesses of my research is that the games I chose to research have features
that are above my skill level to implement into my product. For example the game of thrones
game has the feature of being able to choose from a range of choices, under a time limit and
your choices effect a range of characters etc. I would like to add this feature to my game but I
don’t have the tools or skills to add this to my game. I could have improved my research if I
research games that were similar to what were tasked to created and are able to create. For
example pixel games instead of RPG games.
Planning
• The strengths of my planning are that I have chose to do one idea and
branched of that idea making a range of ideas all based on that one
instead of making multiple ideas that has less information. I think that this
is a strength of my planning because it allows me to make my product stick
to one theme and have a more detail implemented into it.
Time Management
• In this unit I don’t think I managed my time well. This was because when doing my research
and planning I spent too much time putting large amounts of detail in work that either didn’t
need it or I took too long on specific parts of the work. This lead to me falling behind in some
work and missing out some information, this meant that my work was not up to the best
standard I could have done and might have not reached the criteria.
• If I had more time I would have done all my work to the standards it is expected to be and
then once I had finished it all I would have gone back and added more detail and improved it
so that I wont have missed out any work that is needed.
Technical Qualities
In both mine and this other
company's product we both have
tried to add more detail to our
work by adding features in the
background. For example I have
added hills and buildings to my
background to make it add a
larger effect to the audience
while also making the game
more appealing to the audience
however the other product has
made a background that adds to
the effect of the environment
the developer is trying to make.
For my product the frames are
quite slow and jumpy which
might make my product less
appealing to my audience
because my target audience who
are males and females ranged
from the ages of 10-20 prefer to
have games that run smoother
and are more satisfying to play.
The other product has done this
by adding a lot more frames and
making everything a lot
smoother to look more satisfying
to the audience.
Both products have also used a different idea of
animations. For example my products
animations are clunky and are often slow
whereas the other product has many more
frames so it is able to have faster and smoother
animations that look more appealing.
Aesthetic Qualities
I think that my work
does look good however
I don’t think that my
final product will best
suit my target audience
because my target
audience prefers
smoother animated
games that look more
appealing and are more
satisfying when playing.
Because of this I think
that my product would
better suit a younger
audience because of its
simplicity and because
of how it isn’t very
detailed graphics
meaning it will not have
such a large effect on
the audience.
I think that I can improve on the amount of detail I have on my product. For example in the top
half of my product I don’t have a lot of detail and it looks very bland. I think this could be fixed by
adding a hot bar that has stats for ammunition, location, currency, etc. This would not only help
to take up more room but it will make my product look more appealing and will help my
audience more when playing it.
I also think that my product could be improved a lot more if I added more frames onto my
timeline to make the animations smoother and more appealing. I think this would also allow me
to do a lot more animations for my product helping to make it more unique and attractive to my
official target audience.
I like how throughout the game the visuals of my game change depending on the environment. For example before the
bomb goes off the houses all have the lights on and the factory and main characters house has smoke coming out of the
chimney but after the bomb goes off some of the building are destroyed and the lights are off along with there being no
more smoke. This helps to add to the idea of it being a wasteland and there being no life in the area where you first start.
Audience Appeal
I think that my final product has parts that suit my intended target audience however it has features that make it not suit
them as well. For example the idea of the game being set in a wasteland where you have to survive, fight enemy's and the
ability of searching for resources around the map will make this game appeal to the older more mature audience however I
think that the graphics on the game and the speed of the animations will put this audience off and make them not want to
buy it whereas a younger audience might find these types of graphics more appealing as well as the slow pace frames
however the idea of a wasteland theme and the small amount of violence might put the parents of this audience off and
stop them from buy the product.
Even though my target audience is both males
and females I think that my product has ended
up being more appealing to the male audience
rather then the female audience because of the
colour scheme used throughout the game and
because at the start of the game you don’t get a
choice weather you want to be a male or
female character you’re forced to play as a male
character.
Peer
Feedback
Feedback 1
• What did you like about the product?
– I like that the small adver game is set in a
apocalyptic waste land and that a nuclear bomb
goes off and destroys parts off the buildings
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
– I would make it so when the bomb goes off that
the shadow of it would go away because its not
really realistic
Feedback 2
• What did you like about the product?
• The colours and graphics of the animation where good
• The sound effects where very good and interesting, these sound effects made the game
much better and more enjoyable.
• The background of the amination where very detailed and also made the game more visually
interesting.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
• Have a working animation so I can see what the movement of the characters are like.
Feedback 3
• What did you like about the product?
The detail of the background and the character.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
The car window should have black at the front and
yellow at the back, it would’ve looked better and
improve the aim of the game.
Peer Feedback Summary
• What do you agree with from your peer
feedback?- I agree with the statement that the bombs shadow
should disappear and that the car window shouldn’t have a yellow
window at the front and should have it at the back. I think improving on
the detail will help to make my product more appealing to my target
audience.
• What do you disagree with from your peer
feedback?- Personally I don’t disagree with any of the feedback
because all of it helps to improve my product more and make it more
appealing to my audience.
Peer Feedback Summary
I would change my product in mainly the subject of small details to make my product more
appealing overall. First I would increase the speed between frames to make my animation
faster so that it is smoother and is more satisfying and appealing to the audience. I would
also add more context to the game so that the player understands what is going on, for
example when the enemy's first appear the player wont know what they are because they
don’t have any name or anything. To fix this problem I would add a name above the
enemy’s or add a health bar so that the player knows that they can be interacted with in
some way and by their appearance it makes it clear to the player that they are more likely
dangerous.

More Related Content

What's hot

7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluationjosh22bailey
 
Unit 4 Game Evaluation
Unit 4 Game EvaluationUnit 4 Game Evaluation
Unit 4 Game EvaluationClinton Mkala
 
Jump Step Hop Game Evaluation
Jump Step Hop Game EvaluationJump Step Hop Game Evaluation
Jump Step Hop Game EvaluationClinton Mkala
 
5. evaluation(1)
5. evaluation(1)5. evaluation(1)
5. evaluation(1)OliverKeppie
 
7. evaluation done
7. evaluation   done7. evaluation   done
7. evaluation doneDominikBalint
 
7. evaluation (interactive)
7. evaluation (interactive)7. evaluation (interactive)
7. evaluation (interactive)GeorgiaCoop
 
7. evaluation game
7. evaluation game7. evaluation game
7. evaluation gamejackedwardsz
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluationYoran Alflat
 
Unit 4 evaluation
Unit 4 evaluationUnit 4 evaluation
Unit 4 evaluationJakeJarvis5
 
7. evaluation (interactive)
7. evaluation (interactive)7. evaluation (interactive)
7. evaluation (interactive)LouisDoddsRodgers
 
9. video game evaluation for guardian golem
9. video game evaluation for guardian golem9. video game evaluation for guardian golem
9. video game evaluation for guardian golemWill NotTellYou
 
7. evaluation (video game)
7. evaluation (video game)7. evaluation (video game)
7. evaluation (video game)JoshuaMeredith2
 
7. evaluation completed
7. evaluation completed7. evaluation completed
7. evaluation completedLouis Fitton
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluationjessbourke
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluationkipppp
 
1. initial plans mfp updated
1. initial plans mfp updated1. initial plans mfp updated
1. initial plans mfp updatedGemmaNicholls1
 

What's hot (18)

7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
Unit 4 Game Evaluation
Unit 4 Game EvaluationUnit 4 Game Evaluation
Unit 4 Game Evaluation
 
Jump Step Hop Game Evaluation
Jump Step Hop Game EvaluationJump Step Hop Game Evaluation
Jump Step Hop Game Evaluation
 
5. evaluation(1)
5. evaluation(1)5. evaluation(1)
5. evaluation(1)
 
7. evaluation done
7. evaluation   done7. evaluation   done
7. evaluation done
 
7. evaluation (interactive)
7. evaluation (interactive)7. evaluation (interactive)
7. evaluation (interactive)
 
7. evaluation game
7. evaluation game7. evaluation game
7. evaluation game
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
Unit 4 evaluation
Unit 4 evaluationUnit 4 evaluation
Unit 4 evaluation
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
7. evaluation (interactive)
7. evaluation (interactive)7. evaluation (interactive)
7. evaluation (interactive)
 
9. video game evaluation for guardian golem
9. video game evaluation for guardian golem9. video game evaluation for guardian golem
9. video game evaluation for guardian golem
 
7. evaluation (video game)
7. evaluation (video game)7. evaluation (video game)
7. evaluation (video game)
 
evaluation
evaluationevaluation
evaluation
 
7. evaluation completed
7. evaluation completed7. evaluation completed
7. evaluation completed
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
1. initial plans mfp updated
1. initial plans mfp updated1. initial plans mfp updated
1. initial plans mfp updated
 

Similar to 7. evaluation

7. Evaluation (FMP).pptx
7. Evaluation (FMP).pptx7. Evaluation (FMP).pptx
7. Evaluation (FMP).pptxHaziqYou
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluationjay birkin
 
7. evaluation(2)
7. evaluation(2)7. evaluation(2)
7. evaluation(2)LouisGilliland
 
7.evaluation
7.evaluation7.evaluation
7.evaluationAdele Rolf
 
7. evaluation unit 4
7. evaluation unit 47. evaluation unit 4
7. evaluation unit 4Sydney Wratten
 
7. evaluation(2) by jack morton
7. evaluation(2) by jack morton 7. evaluation(2) by jack morton
7. evaluation(2) by jack morton jack-morton
 
7. evaluation (3)
7. evaluation (3)7. evaluation (3)
7. evaluation (3)Louisbiddles7
 
4) evaluation.pptx
4) evaluation.pptx4) evaluation.pptx
4) evaluation.pptxshelbyallerton
 
7. evaluation done
7. evaluation   done7. evaluation   done
7. evaluation doneDominikBalint
 
7. evaluation (interactive)
7. evaluation (interactive)7. evaluation (interactive)
7. evaluation (interactive)nathanwilliams52
 
8. evaluation
8. evaluation8. evaluation
8. evaluationjack-morton
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluationOliverKeppie
 
Pod handler(1)
Pod handler(1)Pod handler(1)
Pod handler(1)LukeHeadland2
 
7. evaluation done
7. evaluation   done7. evaluation   done
7. evaluation doneDominikBalint
 
7. evaluation (hack & slash)
7. evaluation (hack & slash)7. evaluation (hack & slash)
7. evaluation (hack & slash)Josh Ruff
 

Similar to 7. evaluation (20)

7. Evaluation (FMP).pptx
7. Evaluation (FMP).pptx7. Evaluation (FMP).pptx
7. Evaluation (FMP).pptx
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
7. evaluation(2)
7. evaluation(2)7. evaluation(2)
7. evaluation(2)
 
7.evaluation
7.evaluation7.evaluation
7.evaluation
 
7. evaluation unit 4
7. evaluation unit 47. evaluation unit 4
7. evaluation unit 4
 
7. evaluation(2) by jack morton
7. evaluation(2) by jack morton 7. evaluation(2) by jack morton
7. evaluation(2) by jack morton
 
7. evaluation (3)
7. evaluation (3)7. evaluation (3)
7. evaluation (3)
 
4) evaluation.pptx
4) evaluation.pptx4) evaluation.pptx
4) evaluation.pptx
 
evaluation
evaluationevaluation
evaluation
 
7. evaluation(2)
7. evaluation(2)7. evaluation(2)
7. evaluation(2)
 
7. evaluation done
7. evaluation   done7. evaluation   done
7. evaluation done
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
7. evaluation (interactive)
7. evaluation (interactive)7. evaluation (interactive)
7. evaluation (interactive)
 
8. evaluation
8. evaluation8. evaluation
8. evaluation
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
Pod handler(1)
Pod handler(1)Pod handler(1)
Pod handler(1)
 
7. Evaluation
7. Evaluation7. Evaluation
7. Evaluation
 
7.evaluation
7.evaluation7.evaluation
7.evaluation
 
7. evaluation done
7. evaluation   done7. evaluation   done
7. evaluation done
 
7. evaluation (hack & slash)
7. evaluation (hack & slash)7. evaluation (hack & slash)
7. evaluation (hack & slash)
 

More from yorkcollege

7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluationyorkcollege
 
6. production reflection
6. production reflection6. production reflection
6. production reflectionyorkcollege
 
5. pre production
5. pre production5. pre production
5. pre productionyorkcollege
 
4. proposal
4. proposal4. proposal
4. proposalyorkcollege
 
3. production experiments
3. production experiments3. production experiments
3. production experimentsyorkcollege
 
2. research
2. research2. research
2. researchyorkcollege
 
1. initial plans
1. initial plans1. initial plans
1. initial plansyorkcollege
 
Theory research pro-forma
Theory  research pro-formaTheory  research pro-forma
Theory research pro-formayorkcollege
 
Theory meaning pro-forma
Theory  meaning pro-formaTheory  meaning pro-forma
Theory meaning pro-formayorkcollege
 
Theory audience pro-forma
Theory  audience pro-formaTheory  audience pro-forma
Theory audience pro-formayorkcollege
 
3. formal proposal radio
3. formal proposal   radio3. formal proposal   radio
3. formal proposal radioyorkcollege
 
3. formal proposal advergame
3. formal proposal   advergame3. formal proposal   advergame
3. formal proposal advergameyorkcollege
 
2. production techniques evaluation pro forma
2. production techniques evaluation pro forma2. production techniques evaluation pro forma
2. production techniques evaluation pro formayorkcollege
 
1. communication methods pro forma
1. communication methods pro forma1. communication methods pro forma
1. communication methods pro formayorkcollege
 
Theory research pro-forma
Theory  research pro-formaTheory  research pro-forma
Theory research pro-formayorkcollege
 
Theory meaning pro-forma
Theory  meaning pro-formaTheory  meaning pro-forma
Theory meaning pro-formayorkcollege
 
Theory audience pro-forma
Theory  audience pro-formaTheory  audience pro-forma
Theory audience pro-formayorkcollege
 
2. production techniques evaluation pro forma
2. production techniques evaluation pro forma2. production techniques evaluation pro forma
2. production techniques evaluation pro formayorkcollege
 
3. formal proposal advergame
3. formal proposal   advergame3. formal proposal   advergame
3. formal proposal advergameyorkcollege
 
1. communication methods pro forma(1) resubmission
1. communication methods pro forma(1) resubmission1. communication methods pro forma(1) resubmission
1. communication methods pro forma(1) resubmissionyorkcollege
 

More from yorkcollege (20)

7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
6. production reflection
6. production reflection6. production reflection
6. production reflection
 
5. pre production
5. pre production5. pre production
5. pre production
 
4. proposal
4. proposal4. proposal
4. proposal
 
3. production experiments
3. production experiments3. production experiments
3. production experiments
 
2. research
2. research2. research
2. research
 
1. initial plans
1. initial plans1. initial plans
1. initial plans
 
Theory research pro-forma
Theory  research pro-formaTheory  research pro-forma
Theory research pro-forma
 
Theory meaning pro-forma
Theory  meaning pro-formaTheory  meaning pro-forma
Theory meaning pro-forma
 
Theory audience pro-forma
Theory  audience pro-formaTheory  audience pro-forma
Theory audience pro-forma
 
3. formal proposal radio
3. formal proposal   radio3. formal proposal   radio
3. formal proposal radio
 
3. formal proposal advergame
3. formal proposal   advergame3. formal proposal   advergame
3. formal proposal advergame
 
2. production techniques evaluation pro forma
2. production techniques evaluation pro forma2. production techniques evaluation pro forma
2. production techniques evaluation pro forma
 
1. communication methods pro forma
1. communication methods pro forma1. communication methods pro forma
1. communication methods pro forma
 
Theory research pro-forma
Theory  research pro-formaTheory  research pro-forma
Theory research pro-forma
 
Theory meaning pro-forma
Theory  meaning pro-formaTheory  meaning pro-forma
Theory meaning pro-forma
 
Theory audience pro-forma
Theory  audience pro-formaTheory  audience pro-forma
Theory audience pro-forma
 
2. production techniques evaluation pro forma
2. production techniques evaluation pro forma2. production techniques evaluation pro forma
2. production techniques evaluation pro forma
 
3. formal proposal advergame
3. formal proposal   advergame3. formal proposal   advergame
3. formal proposal advergame
 
1. communication methods pro forma(1) resubmission
1. communication methods pro forma(1) resubmission1. communication methods pro forma(1) resubmission
1. communication methods pro forma(1) resubmission
 

Recently uploaded

“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...Marc Dusseiller Dusjagr
 
MARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized Group
MARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized GroupMARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized Group
MARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized GroupJonathanParaisoCruz
 
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...Jisc
 
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...JhezDiaz1
 
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxProudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxthorishapillay1
 
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptxEPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptxRaymartEstabillo3
 
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptxCapitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptxCapitolTechU
 
MICROBIOLOGY biochemical test detailed.pptx
MICROBIOLOGY biochemical test detailed.pptxMICROBIOLOGY biochemical test detailed.pptx
MICROBIOLOGY biochemical test detailed.pptxabhijeetpadhi001
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxiammrhaywood
 
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher EducationIntroduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Educationpboyjonauth
 
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptxPOINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptxSayali Powar
 
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptxTypes of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptxEyham Joco
 
Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdf
Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdfEnzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdf
Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdfSumit Tiwari
 
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptxSolving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptxOH TEIK BIN
 
Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17
Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17
Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17Celine George
 
Meghan Sutherland In Media Res Media Component
Meghan Sutherland In Media Res Media ComponentMeghan Sutherland In Media Res Media Component
Meghan Sutherland In Media Res Media ComponentInMediaRes1
 
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha electionsPresiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha electionsanshu789521
 

Recently uploaded (20)

“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
 
MARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized Group
MARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized GroupMARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized Group
MARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized Group
 
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
 
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
 
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
 
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxProudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
 
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptxEPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
 
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptxCapitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
 
MICROBIOLOGY biochemical test detailed.pptx
MICROBIOLOGY biochemical test detailed.pptxMICROBIOLOGY biochemical test detailed.pptx
MICROBIOLOGY biochemical test detailed.pptx
 
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini Delhi NCR
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini  Delhi NCR9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini  Delhi NCR
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini Delhi NCR
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
 
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher EducationIntroduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
 
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri  Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri  Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptxPOINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
 
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptxTypes of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
 
Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdf
Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdfEnzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdf
Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdf
 
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptxSolving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
 
Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17
Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17
Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17
 
Meghan Sutherland In Media Res Media Component
Meghan Sutherland In Media Res Media ComponentMeghan Sutherland In Media Res Media Component
Meghan Sutherland In Media Res Media Component
 
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha electionsPresiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
 

7. evaluation

  • 3. Research • I think the strengths of my research is that I used ideas from three different games. This allowed my game to have a range of features and ideas so that it attracted a large target audience instead of one small specific audience. I think another strength of my research is that because my game has a range of different features it makes it different and stand out from all other competitors. This gives my product an advantage in the market and attracting the audience. • I think my research helped my product because it allowed me to create my actual game quickly instead of thinking of ideas while I make it. This meant that I was able to have time to go back over my work and change anything I need to without going over my dead line. • I think the weaknesses of my research is that the games I chose to research have features that are above my skill level to implement into my product. For example the game of thrones game has the feature of being able to choose from a range of choices, under a time limit and your choices effect a range of characters etc. I would like to add this feature to my game but I don’t have the tools or skills to add this to my game. I could have improved my research if I research games that were similar to what were tasked to created and are able to create. For example pixel games instead of RPG games.
  • 4. Planning • The strengths of my planning are that I have chose to do one idea and branched of that idea making a range of ideas all based on that one instead of making multiple ideas that has less information. I think that this is a strength of my planning because it allows me to make my product stick to one theme and have a more detail implemented into it.
  • 5. Time Management • In this unit I don’t think I managed my time well. This was because when doing my research and planning I spent too much time putting large amounts of detail in work that either didn’t need it or I took too long on specific parts of the work. This lead to me falling behind in some work and missing out some information, this meant that my work was not up to the best standard I could have done and might have not reached the criteria. • If I had more time I would have done all my work to the standards it is expected to be and then once I had finished it all I would have gone back and added more detail and improved it so that I wont have missed out any work that is needed.
  • 6. Technical Qualities In both mine and this other company's product we both have tried to add more detail to our work by adding features in the background. For example I have added hills and buildings to my background to make it add a larger effect to the audience while also making the game more appealing to the audience however the other product has made a background that adds to the effect of the environment the developer is trying to make. For my product the frames are quite slow and jumpy which might make my product less appealing to my audience because my target audience who are males and females ranged from the ages of 10-20 prefer to have games that run smoother and are more satisfying to play. The other product has done this by adding a lot more frames and making everything a lot smoother to look more satisfying to the audience. Both products have also used a different idea of animations. For example my products animations are clunky and are often slow whereas the other product has many more frames so it is able to have faster and smoother animations that look more appealing.
  • 7. Aesthetic Qualities I think that my work does look good however I don’t think that my final product will best suit my target audience because my target audience prefers smoother animated games that look more appealing and are more satisfying when playing. Because of this I think that my product would better suit a younger audience because of its simplicity and because of how it isn’t very detailed graphics meaning it will not have such a large effect on the audience. I think that I can improve on the amount of detail I have on my product. For example in the top half of my product I don’t have a lot of detail and it looks very bland. I think this could be fixed by adding a hot bar that has stats for ammunition, location, currency, etc. This would not only help to take up more room but it will make my product look more appealing and will help my audience more when playing it. I also think that my product could be improved a lot more if I added more frames onto my timeline to make the animations smoother and more appealing. I think this would also allow me to do a lot more animations for my product helping to make it more unique and attractive to my official target audience. I like how throughout the game the visuals of my game change depending on the environment. For example before the bomb goes off the houses all have the lights on and the factory and main characters house has smoke coming out of the chimney but after the bomb goes off some of the building are destroyed and the lights are off along with there being no more smoke. This helps to add to the idea of it being a wasteland and there being no life in the area where you first start.
  • 8. Audience Appeal I think that my final product has parts that suit my intended target audience however it has features that make it not suit them as well. For example the idea of the game being set in a wasteland where you have to survive, fight enemy's and the ability of searching for resources around the map will make this game appeal to the older more mature audience however I think that the graphics on the game and the speed of the animations will put this audience off and make them not want to buy it whereas a younger audience might find these types of graphics more appealing as well as the slow pace frames however the idea of a wasteland theme and the small amount of violence might put the parents of this audience off and stop them from buy the product. Even though my target audience is both males and females I think that my product has ended up being more appealing to the male audience rather then the female audience because of the colour scheme used throughout the game and because at the start of the game you don’t get a choice weather you want to be a male or female character you’re forced to play as a male character.
  • 10. Feedback 1 • What did you like about the product? – I like that the small adver game is set in a apocalyptic waste land and that a nuclear bomb goes off and destroys parts off the buildings • What improvements could have been made to the product? – I would make it so when the bomb goes off that the shadow of it would go away because its not really realistic
  • 11. Feedback 2 • What did you like about the product? • The colours and graphics of the animation where good • The sound effects where very good and interesting, these sound effects made the game much better and more enjoyable. • The background of the amination where very detailed and also made the game more visually interesting. • What improvements could have been made to the product? • Have a working animation so I can see what the movement of the characters are like.
  • 12. Feedback 3 • What did you like about the product? The detail of the background and the character. • What improvements could have been made to the product? The car window should have black at the front and yellow at the back, it would’ve looked better and improve the aim of the game.
  • 13. Peer Feedback Summary • What do you agree with from your peer feedback?- I agree with the statement that the bombs shadow should disappear and that the car window shouldn’t have a yellow window at the front and should have it at the back. I think improving on the detail will help to make my product more appealing to my target audience. • What do you disagree with from your peer feedback?- Personally I don’t disagree with any of the feedback because all of it helps to improve my product more and make it more appealing to my audience.
  • 14. Peer Feedback Summary I would change my product in mainly the subject of small details to make my product more appealing overall. First I would increase the speed between frames to make my animation faster so that it is smoother and is more satisfying and appealing to the audience. I would also add more context to the game so that the player understands what is going on, for example when the enemy's first appear the player wont know what they are because they don’t have any name or anything. To fix this problem I would add a name above the enemy’s or add a health bar so that the player knows that they can be interacted with in some way and by their appearance it makes it clear to the player that they are more likely dangerous.

Editor's Notes

  1. What were the strengths of your research? How did your research help your product? What were the weaknesses of your research? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
  2. What were the strengths of your planning? How did your planning help your product? What were the weaknesses of your planning? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
  3. Did you manage your time well? Did you complete your project on time or would your products have improved with additional time? What would you have done if you had more time to produce your work?
  4. Compare your work to similar existing products and discuss the similarities and differences Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page alongside an existing product Use text boxes and arrows
  5. Does your work look good? Was it creative? What aspects of your game’s visuals do you like? What would you improve? How would you improve it? Discuss the strengths and weaknesses Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page and analyse them Use text boxes and arrows
  6. How have you appealed to your target audience? What specific bits of content would appeal to your target audience. Refer to your findings from your questionnaire. Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page and analyse them Use text boxes and arrows
  7. What improvements could have been made to the product?
  8. What changes would you make to your product based upon your peer feedback and why?