VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIAL
Dr Saurabh Kushwaha
Resident (Ophthalmology)
SCOPE
 Introduction
 VEP stimuli
 Types of VEP
 Equipments required
 Prerequisites
 Recording of VEP
 Properties of VEP waveform
 Interpretation
 Clinical applications
VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIAL
 EEG is a record of the electrical activity of the brain,
obtained by placing surface electrodes on the scalp
 VEP is an 'evoked' electrophysiological potential
recorded from scalp in response to visual stimuli
 It assess the integrity of the visual pathways from the
optic nerve to the occipital cortex
ANATOMIC BASIS OF VEP
 VEP grossly over-represent
the macular region primarily
because anatomically:
• Macular fibers project to
the occipital lobe cortex,
and those from the
peripheral retina project
deeper within the calcarine
fissure
• Also, over the course of
the visual pathway, the
macular field gets
‘amplified’ as it reaches the
cortex
VEP STIMULI
 VEP can be evoked by either a flash of light or a
pattern
 Flash Stimuli
• The flash VEP is elicited by
flashes of light produced by a
xenon arc photo stimulator
• Occipital cortex is relatively
insensitive to flash
 Pattern Stimuli
• These are presented in a checker-board pattern
• ‘Pattern onset offset‘ form wherein the pattern is
shown for a brief period and then replaced with a
blank screen (of the same intensity)
• ‘Pattern reversal’ type wherein the black and white
checks reverse their orientation
• Luminance contamination: The evoked potential
should be in response only to the changing pattern
and not due to a change in light intensity (brightness)
Therefore, the average luminance must be kept
constant throughout the test
TYPES OF VEP
 Flash VEP
• Less commonly used
• Used in uncooperative
and unconscious patients
 Pattern VEP
• Most commonly used in
clinical practice.
 Chromatic patterned stimuli
• Helpful in detecting color
blindness.
TRANSIENT AND STEADY-STATE
VEP
 If the visual stimulus is intermittent, thus allowing the
brain to recover its resting state in between, then the
VEP obtained is called transient VEP.
• Transient VEP is used for all practical purposes.
 If however, the stimulus is projected faster so that the
brain does not regain its resting state, a sinusoidal
waveform called steady-state VEP is obtained.
• Not used routinely due to inferior information on
latency or amplitude components.
FLASH VEP
 Flash Response to diffusely flashing light stimulus that
subtends a visual field of 20 degrees
 It is performed in a dimly illuminated room
 Cruder response than pattern VEP
 Merely indicates that light has been perceived by cortex
 Indications - media haze, infants, poor pt cooperation
PATTERN REVERSAL VEP
 Response to a patterned stimulus - checkerboard or
square and sine wave gratings
 Frequency of gratings is described in CPD - cycles
per degree
 For check pattern visual angle subtended by a single
check is used
 Preferred technique for most clinical purposes, gives
an estimate of form sense and thus visual acuity
PATTERN ONSET/OFFSET VEP
 A pattern is abruptly exchanged with an
equiilluminant diffuse background
 More intersubject variability than pattern reversal VEP
 Useful in detection of pts with poor fixation,
malingering, deliberate defocusing, pts with nystagmus
EQUIPMENTS REQUIRED
 Visual stimulus producing device
 Scalp electrodes
 Amplifier
 Computer and read out systems
PREREQUISITES
 There should be no distracting sound or light waves
 Pattern and flash must both be done in all patients as
pattern cannot be detected in pts with media opacities
 Pattern VEP followed by flash VEP
 Procedure is significantly affected by eccentric
fixation, excessive blinking of eyes and partial closure
of eyes
RECORDING OF THE VEP
 Recorded monocularly with undilated pupils
 Refractive correction and in a relaxed position at the
calibrated viewing distance (1m distance from monitor)
 The pupillary size should be noted for each
evaluation
 While monocular stimulation is standard; in children
or other special groups, binocular stimulation may be
used to assess visual pathway conduction from either
eye
 While performing flash VEP, a mechanical patch
should be applied over the unstimulated eye
PROPERTIES OF THE VEP
 Amplitude :
• It is the height of the wave (vertical) measured in
microvolts from the preceding trough
• Absolute amplitude is difficult to compare because
of the large variation between normal persons and
variations in sensitivities of the recording equipment
• Relative amplitude (difference between the two
eyes) is more sensitive when looking for unilateral or
asymmetric disease
• In general, absolute amplitude of P100 less than
05 microvolts is abnormal
 Latency :
• Measured in milliseconds, it is the delay between
the stimulus presentation and the peak of the wave
in question.
• Latency shows much less variation between
subjects
• However, it is also affected by a number of
factors, including pupil size, refractive error, age and
stimulus factors (pattern size, luminance and
contrast)
• Latency of P100 wave should not exceed 110 ms
in patients under the age of 60 years.
 Waveform :
• Age dependent and are standardized for a
population between 20 - 60 years of age.
• In a standard wave pattern, the time from stimulus
onset to the maximum positive or negative excursion
of the VEP is recorded as "peak time“
• The flash VEP pattern comprises a series of positive
and negative deflections, with a peak time varying
between 30 ms to 300 ms, the most robust peaks
being the N2 and the P2 peaks at about 90 ms and
120 ms peak time respectively
• Pattern reversal VEP waveforms comprise the N75,
P100 and N135 peaks (Fig. A)
• Standard pattern onset-offset VEPs demonstrate
three main peaks in adults; the C1 positive peak at
about 75 ms, the C2 negative peak at about 125 ms
and C3, another positive peak at about 150 ms (Fig. B)
FACTORS INFLUENCING VEP
 Size of stimulus - Decrease in size of stimulus increases
amplitude of VEP
 Position of electrodes on scalp
 Age - amplitude decreases with age
 Gender - P100 latency is longer in adult males and
mean amplitude is greater in females
 Pupil size - Pupillary constriction increase P100 latency
which is attributed to decreased area of retinal
illumination
 Eye movements - reduces the amplitude of P100 but
latency is not affected
 Attention of patient - If subject looks to side of stimulus,
there is rapid fall in size of response
INTERPRETATION
 Each eye projects to B/L occipital cortex via optic
chiasma
 Unilateral VEP abnormality - Anterior visual pathway
lesion (pre chiasmal lesion)
 Bilateral VEP abnormality - No localizing value
 Latency prolongation
• P 100 Latency prolongation > 3 SD or interocular
latency difference > 10 m sec is significant
• Prolonged P 100 latency - demyelinating lesions,
retinopathies and glaucoma.
 Amplitude reduction
• Amplitude of P 100 shows wide individual variation
• Hence, Inter ocular amplitude ratio is used to
detect abnormalities
• Inter ocular P 100 amplitude ratio > 2 is significant
• Reduced amplitude indicates axonal lesions like
AION
 Combined latency & amplitude abnormalities
• Optic nerve compression produce results in
segmental demyelination and axonal loss
• Hence it produces combined latency and
amplitude abnormalities
CLINICAL APPLICATIONS
PATTERN VEP
 Optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis (MS):
• Characteristically shows a delayed P100 latency
• Finding persists even after recovery of visual acuity,
hence, it can be useful in confirming a previous attack of
optic neuritis
• However, it may not be able to delineate a fresh attack
• Patients with MS but without a history or clinical
features of optic nerve involvement can show abnormal
VEP responses to pattern stimulation, suggesting
subclinical visual pathway involvement.
Left retrobulbar optic neuritis showing a delayed P100 component
 Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy
(NAAION):
• Typically shows reduced wave amplitude but
latency is not significantly delayed
• VEP in the clinically uninvolved eye is invariably
normal
 Compressive lesions:
• Shows prolonged latency at an early stage, though
not as much as in optic neuritis
• Much higher incidence of waveform abnormalities
than in patients with demyelinating disease
 Functional visual loss:
• Distinguishes between organic and functional
visual loss
• A normal pattern VEP establishes the presence of
an intact visual pathway
Optic nerve Ethambutol toxicity showing slow P100 peak times
 Patients with motor disorders:
• Such patients may appear visually impaired
because the eyes cannot track a moving target.
• in children with cerebral palsy, is a preferred
modality, but may be difficult to perform it because of
seizure activity, wandering eye movements or
depressed cortical activity due to anticonvulsants.
 Nystagmus:
• Use of horizontal gratings produces less blur.
• Pattern onset preferred rather than pattern reversal
provide more accurate information.
THANK YOU
 Children with neurofibromatosis type 1 are vulnerable to
development of optic nerve glioma
 VEP can be a more sensitive and cost effective test to
follow the progress of nerve pathology than MRI tests alone
 Malingering and Hysteria:
• Patients with Hysterical Blindness.
• VEP remains normal with vision as low as 1/60.
• VEP can be enhanced by using large fields, large
checks and binocular vision.
 During Orbital or Neurosurgical Procedures:
• Continuous record of optic nerve function in form
of VEP to prevent inadvertent damage to the nerve
during surgical manipulation
FLASH VEP
 Can be performed in shorter time
 No need for active patient participation
 Used in adults and infants with dense media
opacities to test the visual pathway integrity
• A good correlation between VEP prediction and
actual postoperative visual acuity has been seen in
patients with dense cataracts.
 Used as a prognostic tool prior to vitrectomy in
diabetic vitreous hemorrhage
 To evaluate the central nervous system in high-risk
neonates, especially those born prematurely, with
intraventricular hemorrhage, or hydrocephalus.
MULTIFOCAL VEP
 mfVEP recorded with the same equipment as for mfERG
 VEPs recorded simultaneously from multiple regions of
the visual field
 Visual field divided into 60 sectors, each having 16
checks (8 black and 8 white)
 Sectors and checks are scaled differently (peripheral
sectors larger) so that they are all of approximately equal
effectiveness for cortical stimulation.
 Pseudo-random sequences and a software algorithm
allow the on-board computer to rapidly extract information
simultaneously from each of the stimulated sectors.
 mfVEP provides a probability plot like automated
perimeters
 Used to detect small abnormalities in visual signal
transmission from centric and eccentric field and provides
a topographical display of these deficits
 To rule out non-organic visual loss
 To diagnose and follow-up patients of optic neuritis and
multiple sclerosis
 To confirm unreliable or questionable visual field
examinations
MULTICHANNEL VEP
 This technique uses multiple active (parasagittal)
electrodes
 This technique provides localizing value
 Chiasmal lesions show a crossed asymmetry, i.e.
findings of one eye show an asymmetrical distribution that
is reversed when the other eye is stimulated.
 Retrochiasmal lesions show uncrossed asymmetry,
wherein findings of each eye show an asymmetrical
distribution across the hemispheres that is similar when
either eye is stimulated
THANK YOU

VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIAL

  • 1.
    VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIAL DrSaurabh Kushwaha Resident (Ophthalmology)
  • 2.
    SCOPE  Introduction  VEPstimuli  Types of VEP  Equipments required  Prerequisites  Recording of VEP  Properties of VEP waveform  Interpretation  Clinical applications
  • 3.
    VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIAL EEG is a record of the electrical activity of the brain, obtained by placing surface electrodes on the scalp  VEP is an 'evoked' electrophysiological potential recorded from scalp in response to visual stimuli  It assess the integrity of the visual pathways from the optic nerve to the occipital cortex
  • 4.
    ANATOMIC BASIS OFVEP  VEP grossly over-represent the macular region primarily because anatomically: • Macular fibers project to the occipital lobe cortex, and those from the peripheral retina project deeper within the calcarine fissure • Also, over the course of the visual pathway, the macular field gets ‘amplified’ as it reaches the cortex
  • 5.
    VEP STIMULI  VEPcan be evoked by either a flash of light or a pattern  Flash Stimuli • The flash VEP is elicited by flashes of light produced by a xenon arc photo stimulator • Occipital cortex is relatively insensitive to flash
  • 6.
     Pattern Stimuli •These are presented in a checker-board pattern • ‘Pattern onset offset‘ form wherein the pattern is shown for a brief period and then replaced with a blank screen (of the same intensity) • ‘Pattern reversal’ type wherein the black and white checks reverse their orientation • Luminance contamination: The evoked potential should be in response only to the changing pattern and not due to a change in light intensity (brightness) Therefore, the average luminance must be kept constant throughout the test
  • 7.
    TYPES OF VEP Flash VEP • Less commonly used • Used in uncooperative and unconscious patients  Pattern VEP • Most commonly used in clinical practice.  Chromatic patterned stimuli • Helpful in detecting color blindness.
  • 8.
    TRANSIENT AND STEADY-STATE VEP If the visual stimulus is intermittent, thus allowing the brain to recover its resting state in between, then the VEP obtained is called transient VEP. • Transient VEP is used for all practical purposes.  If however, the stimulus is projected faster so that the brain does not regain its resting state, a sinusoidal waveform called steady-state VEP is obtained. • Not used routinely due to inferior information on latency or amplitude components.
  • 10.
    FLASH VEP  FlashResponse to diffusely flashing light stimulus that subtends a visual field of 20 degrees  It is performed in a dimly illuminated room  Cruder response than pattern VEP  Merely indicates that light has been perceived by cortex  Indications - media haze, infants, poor pt cooperation
  • 11.
    PATTERN REVERSAL VEP Response to a patterned stimulus - checkerboard or square and sine wave gratings  Frequency of gratings is described in CPD - cycles per degree  For check pattern visual angle subtended by a single check is used  Preferred technique for most clinical purposes, gives an estimate of form sense and thus visual acuity
  • 12.
    PATTERN ONSET/OFFSET VEP A pattern is abruptly exchanged with an equiilluminant diffuse background  More intersubject variability than pattern reversal VEP  Useful in detection of pts with poor fixation, malingering, deliberate defocusing, pts with nystagmus
  • 13.
    EQUIPMENTS REQUIRED  Visualstimulus producing device  Scalp electrodes  Amplifier  Computer and read out systems
  • 14.
    PREREQUISITES  There shouldbe no distracting sound or light waves  Pattern and flash must both be done in all patients as pattern cannot be detected in pts with media opacities  Pattern VEP followed by flash VEP  Procedure is significantly affected by eccentric fixation, excessive blinking of eyes and partial closure of eyes
  • 15.
    RECORDING OF THEVEP  Recorded monocularly with undilated pupils  Refractive correction and in a relaxed position at the calibrated viewing distance (1m distance from monitor)  The pupillary size should be noted for each evaluation  While monocular stimulation is standard; in children or other special groups, binocular stimulation may be used to assess visual pathway conduction from either eye  While performing flash VEP, a mechanical patch should be applied over the unstimulated eye
  • 16.
    PROPERTIES OF THEVEP  Amplitude : • It is the height of the wave (vertical) measured in microvolts from the preceding trough • Absolute amplitude is difficult to compare because of the large variation between normal persons and variations in sensitivities of the recording equipment • Relative amplitude (difference between the two eyes) is more sensitive when looking for unilateral or asymmetric disease • In general, absolute amplitude of P100 less than 05 microvolts is abnormal
  • 18.
     Latency : •Measured in milliseconds, it is the delay between the stimulus presentation and the peak of the wave in question. • Latency shows much less variation between subjects • However, it is also affected by a number of factors, including pupil size, refractive error, age and stimulus factors (pattern size, luminance and contrast) • Latency of P100 wave should not exceed 110 ms in patients under the age of 60 years.
  • 20.
     Waveform : •Age dependent and are standardized for a population between 20 - 60 years of age. • In a standard wave pattern, the time from stimulus onset to the maximum positive or negative excursion of the VEP is recorded as "peak time“ • The flash VEP pattern comprises a series of positive and negative deflections, with a peak time varying between 30 ms to 300 ms, the most robust peaks being the N2 and the P2 peaks at about 90 ms and 120 ms peak time respectively
  • 21.
    • Pattern reversalVEP waveforms comprise the N75, P100 and N135 peaks (Fig. A) • Standard pattern onset-offset VEPs demonstrate three main peaks in adults; the C1 positive peak at about 75 ms, the C2 negative peak at about 125 ms and C3, another positive peak at about 150 ms (Fig. B)
  • 22.
    FACTORS INFLUENCING VEP Size of stimulus - Decrease in size of stimulus increases amplitude of VEP  Position of electrodes on scalp  Age - amplitude decreases with age  Gender - P100 latency is longer in adult males and mean amplitude is greater in females  Pupil size - Pupillary constriction increase P100 latency which is attributed to decreased area of retinal illumination  Eye movements - reduces the amplitude of P100 but latency is not affected  Attention of patient - If subject looks to side of stimulus, there is rapid fall in size of response
  • 23.
    INTERPRETATION  Each eyeprojects to B/L occipital cortex via optic chiasma  Unilateral VEP abnormality - Anterior visual pathway lesion (pre chiasmal lesion)  Bilateral VEP abnormality - No localizing value  Latency prolongation • P 100 Latency prolongation > 3 SD or interocular latency difference > 10 m sec is significant • Prolonged P 100 latency - demyelinating lesions, retinopathies and glaucoma.
  • 24.
     Amplitude reduction •Amplitude of P 100 shows wide individual variation • Hence, Inter ocular amplitude ratio is used to detect abnormalities • Inter ocular P 100 amplitude ratio > 2 is significant • Reduced amplitude indicates axonal lesions like AION  Combined latency & amplitude abnormalities • Optic nerve compression produce results in segmental demyelination and axonal loss • Hence it produces combined latency and amplitude abnormalities
  • 25.
  • 26.
    PATTERN VEP  Opticneuritis and multiple sclerosis (MS): • Characteristically shows a delayed P100 latency • Finding persists even after recovery of visual acuity, hence, it can be useful in confirming a previous attack of optic neuritis • However, it may not be able to delineate a fresh attack • Patients with MS but without a history or clinical features of optic nerve involvement can show abnormal VEP responses to pattern stimulation, suggesting subclinical visual pathway involvement.
  • 27.
    Left retrobulbar opticneuritis showing a delayed P100 component
  • 28.
     Nonarteritic anteriorischemic optic neuropathy (NAAION): • Typically shows reduced wave amplitude but latency is not significantly delayed • VEP in the clinically uninvolved eye is invariably normal  Compressive lesions: • Shows prolonged latency at an early stage, though not as much as in optic neuritis • Much higher incidence of waveform abnormalities than in patients with demyelinating disease  Functional visual loss: • Distinguishes between organic and functional visual loss • A normal pattern VEP establishes the presence of an intact visual pathway
  • 29.
    Optic nerve Ethambutoltoxicity showing slow P100 peak times
  • 30.
     Patients withmotor disorders: • Such patients may appear visually impaired because the eyes cannot track a moving target. • in children with cerebral palsy, is a preferred modality, but may be difficult to perform it because of seizure activity, wandering eye movements or depressed cortical activity due to anticonvulsants.  Nystagmus: • Use of horizontal gratings produces less blur. • Pattern onset preferred rather than pattern reversal provide more accurate information.
  • 31.
    THANK YOU  Childrenwith neurofibromatosis type 1 are vulnerable to development of optic nerve glioma  VEP can be a more sensitive and cost effective test to follow the progress of nerve pathology than MRI tests alone
  • 32.
     Malingering andHysteria: • Patients with Hysterical Blindness. • VEP remains normal with vision as low as 1/60. • VEP can be enhanced by using large fields, large checks and binocular vision.  During Orbital or Neurosurgical Procedures: • Continuous record of optic nerve function in form of VEP to prevent inadvertent damage to the nerve during surgical manipulation
  • 33.
    FLASH VEP  Canbe performed in shorter time  No need for active patient participation  Used in adults and infants with dense media opacities to test the visual pathway integrity • A good correlation between VEP prediction and actual postoperative visual acuity has been seen in patients with dense cataracts.  Used as a prognostic tool prior to vitrectomy in diabetic vitreous hemorrhage  To evaluate the central nervous system in high-risk neonates, especially those born prematurely, with intraventricular hemorrhage, or hydrocephalus.
  • 34.
    MULTIFOCAL VEP  mfVEPrecorded with the same equipment as for mfERG  VEPs recorded simultaneously from multiple regions of the visual field  Visual field divided into 60 sectors, each having 16 checks (8 black and 8 white)  Sectors and checks are scaled differently (peripheral sectors larger) so that they are all of approximately equal effectiveness for cortical stimulation.  Pseudo-random sequences and a software algorithm allow the on-board computer to rapidly extract information simultaneously from each of the stimulated sectors.  mfVEP provides a probability plot like automated perimeters
  • 35.
     Used todetect small abnormalities in visual signal transmission from centric and eccentric field and provides a topographical display of these deficits  To rule out non-organic visual loss  To diagnose and follow-up patients of optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis  To confirm unreliable or questionable visual field examinations
  • 36.
    MULTICHANNEL VEP  Thistechnique uses multiple active (parasagittal) electrodes  This technique provides localizing value  Chiasmal lesions show a crossed asymmetry, i.e. findings of one eye show an asymmetrical distribution that is reversed when the other eye is stimulated.  Retrochiasmal lesions show uncrossed asymmetry, wherein findings of each eye show an asymmetrical distribution across the hemispheres that is similar when either eye is stimulated
  • 37.