SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Quantitative Methods
Compare Means Test (T-test)
Independent samples and
Paired samples
Keiko Ono, Ph.D.
(2005)
Two-Samples Compare Means Test
(aka Independent-Samples Compare Means Test)
Compare X by (Group)
• Compare group 1 to group2
• Ha: X1 bar > X2 bar OR X1 bar < X2 bar
Ho: X1 bar = X2 bar
• Assumption: two subsamples were drawn
independently
• Sample size equality not necessary
• Test variable: must be interval
• Group variable: categorical, ordinal, interval
Two-Samples Compare Means Test
(aka Independent-Samples Compare Means Test)
• Compare Democrats and Republicans
• Compare Men and Women
• Compare Experimental group and Control group
• Compare drug and placebo
• Compare Brand A and Brand B
• Compare and
Two-Samples Compare Means Test
(aka Independent-Samples Compare Means Test)
• Compare between two groups when there are more than
two groups
→ e.g. Liberal (coded “1”), Moderate (coded “3”),
Conservative (coded “5”).
To compare liberals and conservatives, specify Group1 =
1, Group 2 = 5
Two-Samples Compare Means Test
(aka Independent-Samples Compare Means Test)
• Compare between groups based on interval level
variable
e.g. Feeling thermometer score for feminists
Group 1: respondents 30-years or older
Group 2: under 30
(“cutoff” value would be 30).
Group Statistics
1207 53.62 22.060 .635
213 58.97 20.954 1.436
Respondent age
>= 30
< 30
Thermometer feminists
N Mean Std. Deviation
Std. Error
Mean
Independent Samples Test
.040 .842 -3.283 1418 .001 -5.342 1.627 -8.535 -2.150
-3.403 301.023 .001 -5.342 1.570 -8.432 -2.253
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
Thermometer feminists
F Sig.
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances
t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference Lower Upper
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
t-test for Equality of Means
PID Bush FT
1 D 20
2 R 70
3 D 15
4 D 35
5 R 85
6 R 70
7 D 50
8 R 90
9 R 65
n=9
Two-Samples Compare Means Test
(aka Independent-Samples Compare Means Test)
PID Bush FT
1 D 20
2 R 70
3 D 15
4 D 35
5 R 85
6 R 70
7 D 50
8 R 90
9 R 65
n=9
Sample 1 (Democrats)
n1=4
X1 bar= 30
s1=15.8
Two-Samples Compare Means Test
(aka Independent-Samples Compare Means Test)
PID Bush FT
1 D 20
2 R 70
3 D 15
4 D 35
5 R 85
6 R 70
7 D 50
8 R 90
9 R 65
n=9
Sample 2 (Republicans)
n2=5
X2 bar= 76
s2 = 10.8
Two-Samples Compare Means Test
(aka Independent-Samples Compare Means Test)
Sample 1 (Democrats)
n1=4
X1 bar= 30
s1=15.8
Two-Samples Compare Means Test
(aka Independent-Samples Compare Means Test)
Equal variance assumed (Tomlinson)
Two-Samples Compare Means Test
Example 1. Do men and women feel differently about the military?
(NES 2000)
Group Statistics
665 73.25 20.860 .809
852 72.19 20.130 .690
Gender
1. Male
2. Female
Post:Thermometer
military
N Mean Std. Deviation
Std. Error
Mean
Two-Samples Compare Means Test
Example 1. Do men and women feel differently about the military?
(NES 2000)
Group Statistics
665 73.25 20.860 .809
852 72.19 20.130 .690
Gender
1. Male
2. Female
Post:Thermometer
military
N Mean Std. Deviation
Std. Error
Mean
Independent Samples Test
.272 .602 1.001 1515 .317 1.060 1.058 -1.016 3.136
.997 1402.109 .319 1.060 1.063 -1.025 3.145
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
Post:Thermometer
military
F Sig.
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances
t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference Lower Upper
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
t-test for Equality of Means
Two-Samples Compare Means Test
Example 1. Do men and women feel differently about the military?
(NES 2000)
Group Statistics
665 73.25 20.860 .809
852 72.19 20.130 .690
Gender
1. Male
2. Female
Post:Thermometer
military
N Mean Std. Deviation
Std. Error
Mean
Independent Samples Test
.272 .602 1.001 1515 .317 1.060 1.058 -1.016 3.136
.997 1402.109 .319 1.060 1.063 -1.025 3.145
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
Post:Thermometer
military
F Sig.
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances
t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference Lower Upper
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
t-test for Equality of Means
Confidence Interval
Two-Samples Compare Means Test
Example 1. Do men and women feel differently about the military?
(NES 2000)
Group Statistics
665 73.25 20.860 .809
852 72.19 20.130 .690
Gender
1. Male
2. Female
Post:Thermometer
military
N Mean Std. Deviation
Std. Error
Mean
Independent Samples Test
.272 .602 1.001 1515 .317 1.060 1.058 -1.016 3.136
.997 1402.109 .319 1.060 1.063 -1.025 3.145
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
Post:Thermometer
military
F Sig.
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances
t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference Lower Upper
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
t-test for Equality of Means
Critical value of t = 1.96
t = Mean difference / S.E. of Difference
Two-Samples Compare Means Test
Example 1. Do men and women feel differently about the military?
(NES 2000)
Group Statistics
665 73.25 20.860 .809
852 72.19 20.130 .690
Gender
1. Male
2. Female
Post:Thermometer
military
N Mean Std. Deviation
Std. Error
Mean
Independent Samples Test
.272 .602 1.001 1515 .317 1.060 1.058 -1.016 3.136
.997 1402.109 .319 1.060 1.063 -1.025 3.145
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
Post:Thermometer
military
F Sig.
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances
t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference Lower Upper
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
t-test for Equality of Means
P-value
At 95% confidence level, critical value of p (2-tailed) is .05. If one-tailed, divide by half (.025).
Two-Samples Compare Means Test
Example 1. Do men and women feel differently about the military?
(NES 2000)
Group Statistics
665 73.25 20.860 .809
852 72.19 20.130 .690
Gender
1. Male
2. Female
Post:Thermometer
military
N Mean Std. Deviation
Std. Error
Mean
Independent Samples Test
.272 .602 1.001 1515 .317 1.060 1.058 -1.016 3.136
.997 1402.109 .319 1.060 1.063 -1.025 3.145
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
Post:Thermometer
military
F Sig.
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances
t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference Lower Upper
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
t-test for Equality of Means
P-value
Group Statistics
659 61.93 22.127 .862
825 66.20 20.482 .713
Gender
1. Male
2. Female
D2t. Thermometer
environmentalists
N Mean Std. Deviation
Std. Error
Mean
Independent Samples Test
1.430 .232 -3.852 1482 .000 -4.272 1.109 -6.447 -2.096
-3.819 1358.693 .000 -4.272 1.119 -6.466 -2.077
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
D2t. Thermometer
environmentalists
F Sig.
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances
t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference Lower Upper
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
t-test for Equality of Means
Two-Samples Compare Means Test
Example 2. Do men and women feel differently about
environmentalists? (NES 2000)
Group Statistics
659 61.93 22.127 .862
825 66.20 20.482 .713
Gender
1. Male
2. Female
D2t. Thermometer
environmentalists
N Mean Std. Deviation
Std. Error
Mean
Independent Samples Test
1.430 .232 -3.852 1482 .000 -4.272 1.109 -6.447 -2.096
-3.819 1358.693 .000 -4.272 1.119 -6.466 -2.077
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
D2t. Thermometer
environmentalists
F Sig.
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances
t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference Lower Upper
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
t-test for Equality of Means
Two-Samples Compare Means Test
Example 2. Do men and women feel differently about
environmentalists? (NES 2000)
P-value
Compare Means test – Paired Samples
Independent Samples Compare Means Test dealt
with comparing two independent groups (men vs.
women, Democrat vs. Republican, etc.)
Paired Samples test involves comparing
traits/characteristics of matched observations.
What does this mean?
• Compare before and after new treatment, new
drug, new law, etc.
• Compare t1 and t2 (e.g. GDP in 2005 and GDP
in 2000 across countries, the unit of analysis is
the country)
• Compare average male and female test scores
across schools (the unit of analysis: school)
• Compare opinions and evaluations of different
objects (the unit of analysis: survey
respondent)
Paired-Samples Compare Means Test
Independent Samples Compare Means Test
On average, are men more (or less) favorable toward Clinton than
women?
Respondent Sex Clinton Gore
Andy M 70 50
Matt M 60 45
Richard M 30 50
Dave M 25 40
Elaine F 50 60
Julia F 70 65
Rachel F 50 40
Margaret F 35 55
Male
Mean
Female
Mean
What’s wrong with this picture?
Respondent Clinton Rating Gore Rating
Andy 70
Elaine 60
Can we conclude Clinton is more popular (even with
increased n) based on this set of data?
No…because of Natural Variability
Paired Samples Compare Means Test
On average, is Clinton rating different from Gore rating?
Respondent Sex Clinton Gore
Andy M 70 50
Matt M 60 45
Richard M 30 50
Dave M 25 40
Elaine F 50 60
Julia F 70 65
Rachel F 50 40
Margaret F 35 55
To test the hypothesis, we use the difference
between the two original variables.
Respondent Sex Clinton Gore C-G
Andy M 70 50 20
Matt M 60 45 15
Richard M 30 50 -20
Dave M 25 40 -15
Elaine F 50 60 -10
Julia F 70 65 5
Rachel F 50 40 10
Margaret F 35 55 -20
To test the hypothesis, we use the difference
between the two original variables.
Respondent Sex Clinton Gore C-G
Andy M 70 50 20
Matt M 60 45 15
Richard M 30 50 -20
Dave M 25 40 -15
Elaine F 50 60 -10
Julia F 70 65 5
Rachel F 50 40 10
Margaret F 35 55 -20
Ho:
X bar = 0
Ha:
X bar<0
or
Xbar >0
The Logic of paired samples test
Say someone has developed a new kind of hand
cream. She claims the new cream is far superior to
the conventional one. How do we test this
proposition?
OLD NEW
One way is to assign the old cream to one group of
experimental subjects and give the new one to
another group.
However, there is natural variability due to skin
differences among research subjects.
In other words, our hands are different from our
neighbors’.
So, a better way to test the difference
between the two brands is…
Randomly assign the two brands to each subject’s
right or left hands! This eliminates variability due
to skin differences.
Randomly assign the two brands to each subject’s
right or left hands! This eliminates variability due
to skin differences.
Paired-Samples Compare Means Test
Example
Which gives better mileage, Gasoline A
or Gasoline B?
Paired-Samples Compare Means Test
Better mileage, Gasoline A or
Gasoline B?
Taxi # Gasoline mileage
1 A 25.6
2 A 32.4
3 A 28.6
4 A 31.2
5 A 29.8
6 A 27.9
7 B 24.9
8 B 26.7
9 B 30.6
10 B 29.8
11 B 30.7
12 B 28.4
One method is to randomly assign
gasoline A or B to cars and compare the
means.
Gasoline A
Mean
Gasoline B
Mean
Paired-Samples Compare Means Test
Better mileage, Gasoline A or
Gasoline B?
Problem: Natural variability in driving habits
and conditions of the car
Paired-Samples Compare Means Test
A better method is to assign
gasoline A and B to the same
cars and compare the means.
Taxi # Gasoline A Gasoline B
1 25.6 24.9
2 32.4 26.7
3 28.6 31.2
4 31.2 30.7
5 29.8 29.5
6 27.9 28.7
7 25.9 30.6
8 26.5 28.4
9 31.3 25.7
10 29.5 29.4
11 31.2 32.8
12 28.8 25.2
Paired-Samples Compare Means Test
We hypothesize if there were no difference between Gasoline A and Gasoline B,
on average, the difference would be zero (this is the null hypothesis).
Taxi # Gasoline A Gasoline B Difference (A-B)
1 25.6 24.9 0.7
2 32.4 26.7 5.7
3 28.6 31.2 -2.6
4 31.2 30.7 0.5
5 29.8 29.5 0.3
6 27.9 28.7 -0.8
7 25.9 30.6 -4.7
8 26.5 28.4 -1.9
9 31.3 25.7 5.6
10 29.5 29.4 0.1
11 31.2 32.8 -1.6
12 28.8 25.2 3.6
Paired-Samples Compare Means Test
We hypothesize if there were no difference between Gasoline A and Gasoline B,
on average, the difference would be zero (this is the null hypothesis).
Taxi # Gasoline A Gasoline B Difference (A-B)
1 25.6 24.9 0.7
2 32.4 26.7 5.7
3 28.6 31.2 -2.6
4 31.2 30.7 0.5
5 29.8 29.5 0.3
6 27.9 28.7 -0.8
7 25.9 30.6 -4.7
8 26.5 28.4 -1.9
9 31.3 25.7 5.6
10 29.5 29.4 0.1
11 31.2 32.8 -1.6
12 28.8 25.2 3.6
Ho:
X bar = 0
Ha:
X bar<0
or
Xbar >0
Paired-Samples Compare Means Test
Example
Paired Samples Statistics
55.43 1771 29.675 .705
57.57 1771 25.663 .610
Pre:Thermometer Bill
Clinton
Pre:Thermometer Al Gore
Pair
1
Mean N Std. Deviation
Std. Error
Mean
Paired Samples Correlations
1771 .720 .000
Pre:Thermometer Bill
Clinton &
Pre:Thermometer Al Gore
Pair
1
N Correlation Sig.
Paired Samples Test
-2.141 21.042 .500 -3.121 -1.160 -4.281 1770 .000
Pre:Thermometer Bill
Clinton -
Pre:Thermometer Al Gore
Pair
1
Mean Std. Deviation
Std. Error
Mean Lower Upper
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
Paired Differences
t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Paired-Samples Compare Means Test
Example
Paired Samples Statistics
55.43 1771 29.675 .705
57.57 1771 25.663 .610
Pre:Thermometer Bill
Clinton
Pre:Thermometer Al Gore
Pair
1
Mean N Std. Deviation
Std. Error
Mean
Paired Samples Correlations
1771 .720 .000
Pre:Thermometer Bill
Clinton &
Pre:Thermometer Al Gore
Pair
1
N Correlation Sig.
Paired Samples Test
-2.141 21.042 .500 -3.121 -1.160 -4.281 1770 .000
Pre:Thermometer Bill
Clinton -
Pre:Thermometer Al Gore
Pair
1
Mean Std. Deviation
Std. Error
Mean Lower Upper
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
Paired Differences
t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Confidence Interval
P-value
t = (mean of difference / (S.D. of difference/√n))
• Compare before and after new treatment, new
drug, new law, etc.
• Compare t1 and t2 (e.g. GDP in 2005 and GDP
in 2000 across countries, the unit of analysis is
the country)
• Compare average male and female test scores
across schools (the unit of analysis: school)
• Compare opinions and evaluations of different
objects (the unit of analysis: survey
respondent)
Paired-Samples Compare Means Test
GDP 2000 GDP 2005 D
Chile
Mexico
Argentina
Ecuador
Peru
Columbia
Venezuela
Cholesterol Level
Before drug After drug D
Patient A
Patient B
Patient C
Patient D
Patient E
Patient F
Patient G
Patient H
Paired-Samples Compare Means Test
Average SAT scores
Female Male D
OU
Texas
Kansas
Missouri
Nebraska
Texas A&M
Rice
Arkansas

More Related Content

What's hot

f and t test
f and t testf and t test
Chapter 10 2 way
Chapter 10 2 wayChapter 10 2 way
Chapter 10 2 wayAmi Spears
 
Research method ch08 statistical methods 2 anova
Research method ch08 statistical methods 2 anovaResearch method ch08 statistical methods 2 anova
Research method ch08 statistical methods 2 anovanaranbatn
 
One-Sample Hypothesis Tests
One-Sample Hypothesis TestsOne-Sample Hypothesis Tests
One-Sample Hypothesis Tests
Sr Edith Bogue
 
Test of significance
Test of significanceTest of significance
Test of significance
migom doley
 
One Way Anova
One Way AnovaOne Way Anova
One Way Anovashoffma5
 
The median test
The median testThe median test
The median test
Majesty Ortiz
 
Analysis of Variance
Analysis of VarianceAnalysis of Variance
Analysis of Variance
Kaori Kubo Germano, PhD
 
Tests of significance
Tests of significanceTests of significance
Tests of significance
AkhilaNatesan
 
Student t-test
Student t-testStudent t-test
Student t-test
Steve Bishop
 
Anova by Hazilah Mohd Amin
Anova by Hazilah Mohd AminAnova by Hazilah Mohd Amin
Anova by Hazilah Mohd Amin
HazilahMohd
 
parametric test of difference z test f test one-way_two-way_anova
parametric test of difference z test f test one-way_two-way_anova parametric test of difference z test f test one-way_two-way_anova
parametric test of difference z test f test one-way_two-way_anova
Tess Anoza
 
Two sample t-test
Two sample t-testTwo sample t-test
Two sample t-test
Stephen Lange
 
T test statistics
T test statisticsT test statistics
T test statistics
Mohammad Ihmeidan
 
F test and ANOVA
F test and ANOVAF test and ANOVA
F test and ANOVA
MEENURANJI
 
F test and ANOVA
F test and ANOVAF test and ANOVA
F test and ANOVA
Parag Shah
 
7 anova chi square test
 7 anova chi square test 7 anova chi square test
7 anova chi square test
Penny Jiang
 

What's hot (20)

T test
T testT test
T test
 
f and t test
f and t testf and t test
f and t test
 
Chapter 10 2 way
Chapter 10 2 wayChapter 10 2 way
Chapter 10 2 way
 
Research method ch08 statistical methods 2 anova
Research method ch08 statistical methods 2 anovaResearch method ch08 statistical methods 2 anova
Research method ch08 statistical methods 2 anova
 
One-Sample Hypothesis Tests
One-Sample Hypothesis TestsOne-Sample Hypothesis Tests
One-Sample Hypothesis Tests
 
Comparing means
Comparing meansComparing means
Comparing means
 
Test of significance
Test of significanceTest of significance
Test of significance
 
One Way Anova
One Way AnovaOne Way Anova
One Way Anova
 
The median test
The median testThe median test
The median test
 
Analysis of Variance
Analysis of VarianceAnalysis of Variance
Analysis of Variance
 
Tests of significance
Tests of significanceTests of significance
Tests of significance
 
Student t-test
Student t-testStudent t-test
Student t-test
 
Anova by Hazilah Mohd Amin
Anova by Hazilah Mohd AminAnova by Hazilah Mohd Amin
Anova by Hazilah Mohd Amin
 
parametric test of difference z test f test one-way_two-way_anova
parametric test of difference z test f test one-way_two-way_anova parametric test of difference z test f test one-way_two-way_anova
parametric test of difference z test f test one-way_two-way_anova
 
Two sample t-test
Two sample t-testTwo sample t-test
Two sample t-test
 
T test statistics
T test statisticsT test statistics
T test statistics
 
F test and ANOVA
F test and ANOVAF test and ANOVA
F test and ANOVA
 
F test and ANOVA
F test and ANOVAF test and ANOVA
F test and ANOVA
 
7 anova chi square test
 7 anova chi square test 7 anova chi square test
7 anova chi square test
 
Z tests test statistic
Z  tests test statisticZ  tests test statistic
Z tests test statistic
 

Viewers also liked

Quantitative method intro variable_levels_measurement
Quantitative method intro variable_levels_measurementQuantitative method intro variable_levels_measurement
Quantitative method intro variable_levels_measurement
Keiko Ono
 
Nonparametric hypothesis testing methods
Nonparametric hypothesis testing methodsNonparametric hypothesis testing methods
Nonparametric hypothesis testing methods
Gaetan Lion
 
HFS 3283 independent t test
HFS 3283 independent t testHFS 3283 independent t test
HFS 3283 independent t test
wajihahwafa
 
HFS3283 paired t tes-t and anova
HFS3283 paired t tes-t and anovaHFS3283 paired t tes-t and anova
HFS3283 paired t tes-t and anova
wajihahwafa
 
GIS introduction (2004)
GIS introduction (2004)GIS introduction (2004)
GIS introduction (2004)
Keiko Ono
 
Bia sach toi uu hoa tn
Bia sach toi uu hoa tnBia sach toi uu hoa tn
Bia sach toi uu hoa tn
Canh Dong Xanh
 
Quy hoạch thực nghiệm (9)
Quy hoạch thực nghiệm (9)Quy hoạch thực nghiệm (9)
Quy hoạch thực nghiệm (9)Phạm Vấn
 
Bg qui hoach-hoa_thuc_nghiem-co_lien_
Bg qui hoach-hoa_thuc_nghiem-co_lien_Bg qui hoach-hoa_thuc_nghiem-co_lien_
Bg qui hoach-hoa_thuc_nghiem-co_lien_Trần Thanh Hảo
 
How skewness in option prices affected Madoff strategy
How skewness in option prices affected Madoff strategyHow skewness in option prices affected Madoff strategy
How skewness in option prices affected Madoff strategy
Gaetan Lion
 
SIGIR2016
SIGIR2016SIGIR2016
SIGIR2016
Tetsuya Sakai
 
Unpaired t Test Family
Unpaired t Test FamilyUnpaired t Test Family
Unpaired t Test Family
Gaetan Lion
 
Parametric tests
Parametric testsParametric tests
Parametric tests
Ananya Sree Katta
 
Experimental design data analysis
Experimental design data analysisExperimental design data analysis
Experimental design data analysismetalkid132
 
Chapter 4 kiem dinh thong ke
Chapter 4 kiem dinh thong keChapter 4 kiem dinh thong ke
Chapter 4 kiem dinh thong kepmxuandba
 
Bai tap loi_giai_xac_suat_thong_ke_2733
Bai tap loi_giai_xac_suat_thong_ke_2733Bai tap loi_giai_xac_suat_thong_ke_2733
Bai tap loi_giai_xac_suat_thong_ke_2733
behieuso1
 
quy hoach truc giao cap 1
quy hoach truc giao cap 1quy hoach truc giao cap 1
quy hoach truc giao cap 1
nhóc Ngố
 
Dte Energy Grant
Dte Energy GrantDte Energy Grant
Dte Energy Grantshoffma5
 
The Law School Bubble
The Law School BubbleThe Law School Bubble
The Law School Bubble
Gaetan Lion
 
Applied Econometrics assignment3
Applied Econometrics assignment3Applied Econometrics assignment3
Applied Econometrics assignment3Chenguang Li
 
Regresion lineal multiple_3
Regresion lineal multiple_3Regresion lineal multiple_3
Regresion lineal multiple_3karinita12
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Quantitative method intro variable_levels_measurement
Quantitative method intro variable_levels_measurementQuantitative method intro variable_levels_measurement
Quantitative method intro variable_levels_measurement
 
Nonparametric hypothesis testing methods
Nonparametric hypothesis testing methodsNonparametric hypothesis testing methods
Nonparametric hypothesis testing methods
 
HFS 3283 independent t test
HFS 3283 independent t testHFS 3283 independent t test
HFS 3283 independent t test
 
HFS3283 paired t tes-t and anova
HFS3283 paired t tes-t and anovaHFS3283 paired t tes-t and anova
HFS3283 paired t tes-t and anova
 
GIS introduction (2004)
GIS introduction (2004)GIS introduction (2004)
GIS introduction (2004)
 
Bia sach toi uu hoa tn
Bia sach toi uu hoa tnBia sach toi uu hoa tn
Bia sach toi uu hoa tn
 
Quy hoạch thực nghiệm (9)
Quy hoạch thực nghiệm (9)Quy hoạch thực nghiệm (9)
Quy hoạch thực nghiệm (9)
 
Bg qui hoach-hoa_thuc_nghiem-co_lien_
Bg qui hoach-hoa_thuc_nghiem-co_lien_Bg qui hoach-hoa_thuc_nghiem-co_lien_
Bg qui hoach-hoa_thuc_nghiem-co_lien_
 
How skewness in option prices affected Madoff strategy
How skewness in option prices affected Madoff strategyHow skewness in option prices affected Madoff strategy
How skewness in option prices affected Madoff strategy
 
SIGIR2016
SIGIR2016SIGIR2016
SIGIR2016
 
Unpaired t Test Family
Unpaired t Test FamilyUnpaired t Test Family
Unpaired t Test Family
 
Parametric tests
Parametric testsParametric tests
Parametric tests
 
Experimental design data analysis
Experimental design data analysisExperimental design data analysis
Experimental design data analysis
 
Chapter 4 kiem dinh thong ke
Chapter 4 kiem dinh thong keChapter 4 kiem dinh thong ke
Chapter 4 kiem dinh thong ke
 
Bai tap loi_giai_xac_suat_thong_ke_2733
Bai tap loi_giai_xac_suat_thong_ke_2733Bai tap loi_giai_xac_suat_thong_ke_2733
Bai tap loi_giai_xac_suat_thong_ke_2733
 
quy hoach truc giao cap 1
quy hoach truc giao cap 1quy hoach truc giao cap 1
quy hoach truc giao cap 1
 
Dte Energy Grant
Dte Energy GrantDte Energy Grant
Dte Energy Grant
 
The Law School Bubble
The Law School BubbleThe Law School Bubble
The Law School Bubble
 
Applied Econometrics assignment3
Applied Econometrics assignment3Applied Econometrics assignment3
Applied Econometrics assignment3
 
Regresion lineal multiple_3
Regresion lineal multiple_3Regresion lineal multiple_3
Regresion lineal multiple_3
 

Similar to Quantitative method compare means test (independent and paired)

Unit-5.-t-test.ppt
Unit-5.-t-test.pptUnit-5.-t-test.ppt
Unit-5.-t-test.ppt
frelynmaeDillo
 
Stat2013
Stat2013Stat2013
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Sneh Kumari
 
Chapter36a
Chapter36aChapter36a
Chapter36a
Ying Liu
 
Applied statistics lecture_3
Applied statistics lecture_3Applied statistics lecture_3
Applied statistics lecture_3Daria Bogdanova
 
T test for two independent samples and induction
T test for two independent samples and inductionT test for two independent samples and induction
T test for two independent samples and induction
Emmanuel Buah
 
Multiplicity, how to deal with the testing of more than one hypothesis.
Multiplicity, how to deal with the testing of more than one hypothesis.Multiplicity, how to deal with the testing of more than one hypothesis.
Multiplicity, how to deal with the testing of more than one hypothesis.
Gaetan Lion
 
Marketing Research Hypothesis Testing.pptx
Marketing Research Hypothesis Testing.pptxMarketing Research Hypothesis Testing.pptx
Marketing Research Hypothesis Testing.pptx
xababid981
 
t Test- Thiyagu
t Test- Thiyagut Test- Thiyagu
t Test- Thiyagu
Thiyagu K
 
Two Sample Tests
Two Sample TestsTwo Sample Tests
Two Sample Testssanketd1983
 
T Test and ANOVA Presentation_By Limon.pptx
T Test and ANOVA Presentation_By Limon.pptxT Test and ANOVA Presentation_By Limon.pptx
T Test and ANOVA Presentation_By Limon.pptx
Akhtaruzzamanlimon1
 
Introduction to t-tests (statistics)
Introduction to t-tests (statistics)Introduction to t-tests (statistics)
Introduction to t-tests (statistics)
Dr Bryan Mills
 
tests of significance
tests of significancetests of significance
tests of significance
benita regi
 
11 T(EA) FOR TWO TESTS BETWEEN THE MEANS OF DIFFERENT GROUPS11 .docx
11 T(EA) FOR TWO TESTS BETWEEN THE MEANS OF DIFFERENT GROUPS11 .docx11 T(EA) FOR TWO TESTS BETWEEN THE MEANS OF DIFFERENT GROUPS11 .docx
11 T(EA) FOR TWO TESTS BETWEEN THE MEANS OF DIFFERENT GROUPS11 .docx
novabroom
 
11 T(EA) FOR TWO TESTS BETWEEN THE MEANS OF DIFFERENT GROUPS11 .docx
11 T(EA) FOR TWO TESTS BETWEEN THE MEANS OF DIFFERENT GROUPS11 .docx11 T(EA) FOR TWO TESTS BETWEEN THE MEANS OF DIFFERENT GROUPS11 .docx
11 T(EA) FOR TWO TESTS BETWEEN THE MEANS OF DIFFERENT GROUPS11 .docx
hyacinthshackley2629
 
Biostatistics ii
Biostatistics iiBiostatistics ii
Biostatistics ii
Thangamani Ramalingam
 
Chi square test
Chi square testChi square test
Section 1 Data File DescriptionThe fictional data represents a te.docx
Section 1 Data File DescriptionThe fictional data represents a te.docxSection 1 Data File DescriptionThe fictional data represents a te.docx
Section 1 Data File DescriptionThe fictional data represents a te.docx
bagotjesusa
 
Lesson06_static11
Lesson06_static11Lesson06_static11
Lesson06_static11thangv
 
jhghgjhgjhgjhfhcgjfjhvjhjgjkggjhgjhgjhfjgjgfgfhgfhg
jhghgjhgjhgjhfhcgjfjhvjhjgjkggjhgjhgjhfjgjgfgfhgfhgjhghgjhgjhgjhfhcgjfjhvjhjgjkggjhgjhgjhfjgjgfgfhgfhg
jhghgjhgjhgjhfhcgjfjhvjhjgjkggjhgjhgjhfjgjgfgfhgfhg
UMAIRASHFAQ20
 

Similar to Quantitative method compare means test (independent and paired) (20)

Unit-5.-t-test.ppt
Unit-5.-t-test.pptUnit-5.-t-test.ppt
Unit-5.-t-test.ppt
 
Stat2013
Stat2013Stat2013
Stat2013
 
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
 
Chapter36a
Chapter36aChapter36a
Chapter36a
 
Applied statistics lecture_3
Applied statistics lecture_3Applied statistics lecture_3
Applied statistics lecture_3
 
T test for two independent samples and induction
T test for two independent samples and inductionT test for two independent samples and induction
T test for two independent samples and induction
 
Multiplicity, how to deal with the testing of more than one hypothesis.
Multiplicity, how to deal with the testing of more than one hypothesis.Multiplicity, how to deal with the testing of more than one hypothesis.
Multiplicity, how to deal with the testing of more than one hypothesis.
 
Marketing Research Hypothesis Testing.pptx
Marketing Research Hypothesis Testing.pptxMarketing Research Hypothesis Testing.pptx
Marketing Research Hypothesis Testing.pptx
 
t Test- Thiyagu
t Test- Thiyagut Test- Thiyagu
t Test- Thiyagu
 
Two Sample Tests
Two Sample TestsTwo Sample Tests
Two Sample Tests
 
T Test and ANOVA Presentation_By Limon.pptx
T Test and ANOVA Presentation_By Limon.pptxT Test and ANOVA Presentation_By Limon.pptx
T Test and ANOVA Presentation_By Limon.pptx
 
Introduction to t-tests (statistics)
Introduction to t-tests (statistics)Introduction to t-tests (statistics)
Introduction to t-tests (statistics)
 
tests of significance
tests of significancetests of significance
tests of significance
 
11 T(EA) FOR TWO TESTS BETWEEN THE MEANS OF DIFFERENT GROUPS11 .docx
11 T(EA) FOR TWO TESTS BETWEEN THE MEANS OF DIFFERENT GROUPS11 .docx11 T(EA) FOR TWO TESTS BETWEEN THE MEANS OF DIFFERENT GROUPS11 .docx
11 T(EA) FOR TWO TESTS BETWEEN THE MEANS OF DIFFERENT GROUPS11 .docx
 
11 T(EA) FOR TWO TESTS BETWEEN THE MEANS OF DIFFERENT GROUPS11 .docx
11 T(EA) FOR TWO TESTS BETWEEN THE MEANS OF DIFFERENT GROUPS11 .docx11 T(EA) FOR TWO TESTS BETWEEN THE MEANS OF DIFFERENT GROUPS11 .docx
11 T(EA) FOR TWO TESTS BETWEEN THE MEANS OF DIFFERENT GROUPS11 .docx
 
Biostatistics ii
Biostatistics iiBiostatistics ii
Biostatistics ii
 
Chi square test
Chi square testChi square test
Chi square test
 
Section 1 Data File DescriptionThe fictional data represents a te.docx
Section 1 Data File DescriptionThe fictional data represents a te.docxSection 1 Data File DescriptionThe fictional data represents a te.docx
Section 1 Data File DescriptionThe fictional data represents a te.docx
 
Lesson06_static11
Lesson06_static11Lesson06_static11
Lesson06_static11
 
jhghgjhgjhgjhfhcgjfjhvjhjgjkggjhgjhgjhfjgjgfgfhgfhg
jhghgjhgjhgjhfhcgjfjhvjhjgjkggjhgjhgjhfjgjgfgfhgfhgjhghgjhgjhgjhfhcgjfjhvjhjgjkggjhgjhgjhfjgjgfgfhgfhg
jhghgjhgjhgjhfhcgjfjhvjhjgjkggjhgjhgjhfjgjgfgfhgfhg
 

More from Keiko Ono

3-D geospatial data for disaster management and development
3-D geospatial data for disaster management and development3-D geospatial data for disaster management and development
3-D geospatial data for disaster management and development
Keiko Ono
 
Political science meets computer science
Political science meets computer sciencePolitical science meets computer science
Political science meets computer science
Keiko Ono
 
人口知能・自然言語処理・社会科学・政治学
人口知能・自然言語処理・社会科学・政治学人口知能・自然言語処理・社会科学・政治学
人口知能・自然言語処理・社会科学・政治学
Keiko Ono
 
Data science week_1
Data science week_1Data science week_1
Data science week_1
Keiko Ono
 
Data science week_2_visualization
Data science week_2_visualizationData science week_2_visualization
Data science week_2_visualization
Keiko Ono
 
US presidential selection: the Electoral College challenged (again)
US presidential selection: the Electoral College challenged (again)US presidential selection: the Electoral College challenged (again)
US presidential selection: the Electoral College challenged (again)
Keiko Ono
 
The latest trends in academic research on GIS
The latest trends in academic research on GISThe latest trends in academic research on GIS
The latest trends in academic research on GIS
Keiko Ono
 
サーベイに基づく公的データが問題になった2例(2018年)
サーベイに基づく公的データが問題になった2例(2018年)サーベイに基づく公的データが問題になった2例(2018年)
サーベイに基づく公的データが問題になった2例(2018年)
Keiko Ono
 
比べてみた関関同立の研究力 Top Kansai private universities' research output
比べてみた関関同立の研究力 Top Kansai private universities' research output 比べてみた関関同立の研究力 Top Kansai private universities' research output
比べてみた関関同立の研究力 Top Kansai private universities' research output
Keiko Ono
 
Research analysis waseda_2018
Research analysis waseda_2018Research analysis waseda_2018
Research analysis waseda_2018
Keiko Ono
 
Journal analysis SSJJ 2018
Journal analysis SSJJ 2018Journal analysis SSJJ 2018
Journal analysis SSJJ 2018
Keiko Ono
 
Journal analysis JJPS_2017
Journal analysis JJPS_2017Journal analysis JJPS_2017
Journal analysis JJPS_2017
Keiko Ono
 
How academic research on GitHub has evolved in the last several years
How academic research on GitHub has evolved in the last several yearsHow academic research on GitHub has evolved in the last several years
How academic research on GitHub has evolved in the last several years
Keiko Ono
 
Multiple regression: creating a dummy variable and an interaction
Multiple regression: creating a dummy variable and an interaction Multiple regression: creating a dummy variable and an interaction
Multiple regression: creating a dummy variable and an interaction
Keiko Ono
 
The Russians, the US presidency in peril, and the Mueller investigation
The Russians, the US presidency in peril, and the Mueller investigationThe Russians, the US presidency in peril, and the Mueller investigation
The Russians, the US presidency in peril, and the Mueller investigation
Keiko Ono
 
Multiple regression with interaction term 2018
Multiple regression with interaction term 2018Multiple regression with interaction term 2018
Multiple regression with interaction term 2018
Keiko Ono
 
Data visualization and its application to politics and elections
Data visualization and its application to politics and electionsData visualization and its application to politics and elections
Data visualization and its application to politics and elections
Keiko Ono
 
Saitama
SaitamaSaitama
Saitama
Keiko Ono
 
Open meteorological data_himeji
Open meteorological data_himejiOpen meteorological data_himeji
Open meteorological data_himeji
Keiko Ono
 
Encoding in excel
Encoding in excelEncoding in excel
Encoding in excel
Keiko Ono
 

More from Keiko Ono (20)

3-D geospatial data for disaster management and development
3-D geospatial data for disaster management and development3-D geospatial data for disaster management and development
3-D geospatial data for disaster management and development
 
Political science meets computer science
Political science meets computer sciencePolitical science meets computer science
Political science meets computer science
 
人口知能・自然言語処理・社会科学・政治学
人口知能・自然言語処理・社会科学・政治学人口知能・自然言語処理・社会科学・政治学
人口知能・自然言語処理・社会科学・政治学
 
Data science week_1
Data science week_1Data science week_1
Data science week_1
 
Data science week_2_visualization
Data science week_2_visualizationData science week_2_visualization
Data science week_2_visualization
 
US presidential selection: the Electoral College challenged (again)
US presidential selection: the Electoral College challenged (again)US presidential selection: the Electoral College challenged (again)
US presidential selection: the Electoral College challenged (again)
 
The latest trends in academic research on GIS
The latest trends in academic research on GISThe latest trends in academic research on GIS
The latest trends in academic research on GIS
 
サーベイに基づく公的データが問題になった2例(2018年)
サーベイに基づく公的データが問題になった2例(2018年)サーベイに基づく公的データが問題になった2例(2018年)
サーベイに基づく公的データが問題になった2例(2018年)
 
比べてみた関関同立の研究力 Top Kansai private universities' research output
比べてみた関関同立の研究力 Top Kansai private universities' research output 比べてみた関関同立の研究力 Top Kansai private universities' research output
比べてみた関関同立の研究力 Top Kansai private universities' research output
 
Research analysis waseda_2018
Research analysis waseda_2018Research analysis waseda_2018
Research analysis waseda_2018
 
Journal analysis SSJJ 2018
Journal analysis SSJJ 2018Journal analysis SSJJ 2018
Journal analysis SSJJ 2018
 
Journal analysis JJPS_2017
Journal analysis JJPS_2017Journal analysis JJPS_2017
Journal analysis JJPS_2017
 
How academic research on GitHub has evolved in the last several years
How academic research on GitHub has evolved in the last several yearsHow academic research on GitHub has evolved in the last several years
How academic research on GitHub has evolved in the last several years
 
Multiple regression: creating a dummy variable and an interaction
Multiple regression: creating a dummy variable and an interaction Multiple regression: creating a dummy variable and an interaction
Multiple regression: creating a dummy variable and an interaction
 
The Russians, the US presidency in peril, and the Mueller investigation
The Russians, the US presidency in peril, and the Mueller investigationThe Russians, the US presidency in peril, and the Mueller investigation
The Russians, the US presidency in peril, and the Mueller investigation
 
Multiple regression with interaction term 2018
Multiple regression with interaction term 2018Multiple regression with interaction term 2018
Multiple regression with interaction term 2018
 
Data visualization and its application to politics and elections
Data visualization and its application to politics and electionsData visualization and its application to politics and elections
Data visualization and its application to politics and elections
 
Saitama
SaitamaSaitama
Saitama
 
Open meteorological data_himeji
Open meteorological data_himejiOpen meteorological data_himeji
Open meteorological data_himeji
 
Encoding in excel
Encoding in excelEncoding in excel
Encoding in excel
 

Recently uploaded

Investigate & Recover / StarCompliance.io / Crypto_Crimes
Investigate & Recover / StarCompliance.io / Crypto_CrimesInvestigate & Recover / StarCompliance.io / Crypto_Crimes
Investigate & Recover / StarCompliance.io / Crypto_Crimes
StarCompliance.io
 
Business update Q1 2024 Lar España Real Estate SOCIMI
Business update Q1 2024 Lar España Real Estate SOCIMIBusiness update Q1 2024 Lar España Real Estate SOCIMI
Business update Q1 2024 Lar España Real Estate SOCIMI
AlejandraGmez176757
 
一比一原版(QU毕业证)皇后大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(QU毕业证)皇后大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(QU毕业证)皇后大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(QU毕业证)皇后大学毕业证成绩单
enxupq
 
Q1’2024 Update: MYCI’s Leap Year Rebound
Q1’2024 Update: MYCI’s Leap Year ReboundQ1’2024 Update: MYCI’s Leap Year Rebound
Q1’2024 Update: MYCI’s Leap Year Rebound
Oppotus
 
一比一原版(YU毕业证)约克大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(YU毕业证)约克大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(YU毕业证)约克大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(YU毕业证)约克大学毕业证成绩单
enxupq
 
一比一原版(UofM毕业证)明尼苏达大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UofM毕业证)明尼苏达大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(UofM毕业证)明尼苏达大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UofM毕业证)明尼苏达大学毕业证成绩单
ewymefz
 
Opendatabay - Open Data Marketplace.pptx
Opendatabay - Open Data Marketplace.pptxOpendatabay - Open Data Marketplace.pptx
Opendatabay - Open Data Marketplace.pptx
Opendatabay
 
一比一原版(RUG毕业证)格罗宁根大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(RUG毕业证)格罗宁根大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(RUG毕业证)格罗宁根大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(RUG毕业证)格罗宁根大学毕业证成绩单
vcaxypu
 
1.Seydhcuxhxyxhccuuxuxyxyxmisolids 2019.pptx
1.Seydhcuxhxyxhccuuxuxyxyxmisolids 2019.pptx1.Seydhcuxhxyxhccuuxuxyxyxmisolids 2019.pptx
1.Seydhcuxhxyxhccuuxuxyxyxmisolids 2019.pptx
Tiktokethiodaily
 
一比一原版(CU毕业证)卡尔顿大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(CU毕业证)卡尔顿大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(CU毕业证)卡尔顿大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(CU毕业证)卡尔顿大学毕业证成绩单
yhkoc
 
一比一原版(CBU毕业证)卡普顿大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(CBU毕业证)卡普顿大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(CBU毕业证)卡普顿大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(CBU毕业证)卡普顿大学毕业证成绩单
nscud
 
一比一原版(IIT毕业证)伊利诺伊理工大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(IIT毕业证)伊利诺伊理工大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(IIT毕业证)伊利诺伊理工大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(IIT毕业证)伊利诺伊理工大学毕业证成绩单
ewymefz
 
Jpolillo Amazon PPC - Bid Optimization Sample
Jpolillo Amazon PPC - Bid Optimization SampleJpolillo Amazon PPC - Bid Optimization Sample
Jpolillo Amazon PPC - Bid Optimization Sample
James Polillo
 
Tabula.io Cheatsheet: automate your data workflows
Tabula.io Cheatsheet: automate your data workflowsTabula.io Cheatsheet: automate your data workflows
Tabula.io Cheatsheet: automate your data workflows
alex933524
 
一比一原版(TWU毕业证)西三一大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(TWU毕业证)西三一大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(TWU毕业证)西三一大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(TWU毕业证)西三一大学毕业证成绩单
ocavb
 
Adjusting primitives for graph : SHORT REPORT / NOTES
Adjusting primitives for graph : SHORT REPORT / NOTESAdjusting primitives for graph : SHORT REPORT / NOTES
Adjusting primitives for graph : SHORT REPORT / NOTES
Subhajit Sahu
 
做(mqu毕业证书)麦考瑞大学毕业证硕士文凭证书学费发票原版一模一样
做(mqu毕业证书)麦考瑞大学毕业证硕士文凭证书学费发票原版一模一样做(mqu毕业证书)麦考瑞大学毕业证硕士文凭证书学费发票原版一模一样
做(mqu毕业证书)麦考瑞大学毕业证硕士文凭证书学费发票原版一模一样
axoqas
 
The affect of service quality and online reviews on customer loyalty in the E...
The affect of service quality and online reviews on customer loyalty in the E...The affect of service quality and online reviews on customer loyalty in the E...
The affect of service quality and online reviews on customer loyalty in the E...
jerlynmaetalle
 
一比一原版(UMich毕业证)密歇根大学|安娜堡分校毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UMich毕业证)密歇根大学|安娜堡分校毕业证成绩单一比一原版(UMich毕业证)密歇根大学|安娜堡分校毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UMich毕业证)密歇根大学|安娜堡分校毕业证成绩单
ewymefz
 
一比一原版(CBU毕业证)不列颠海角大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(CBU毕业证)不列颠海角大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(CBU毕业证)不列颠海角大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(CBU毕业证)不列颠海角大学毕业证成绩单
nscud
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Investigate & Recover / StarCompliance.io / Crypto_Crimes
Investigate & Recover / StarCompliance.io / Crypto_CrimesInvestigate & Recover / StarCompliance.io / Crypto_Crimes
Investigate & Recover / StarCompliance.io / Crypto_Crimes
 
Business update Q1 2024 Lar España Real Estate SOCIMI
Business update Q1 2024 Lar España Real Estate SOCIMIBusiness update Q1 2024 Lar España Real Estate SOCIMI
Business update Q1 2024 Lar España Real Estate SOCIMI
 
一比一原版(QU毕业证)皇后大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(QU毕业证)皇后大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(QU毕业证)皇后大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(QU毕业证)皇后大学毕业证成绩单
 
Q1’2024 Update: MYCI’s Leap Year Rebound
Q1’2024 Update: MYCI’s Leap Year ReboundQ1’2024 Update: MYCI’s Leap Year Rebound
Q1’2024 Update: MYCI’s Leap Year Rebound
 
一比一原版(YU毕业证)约克大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(YU毕业证)约克大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(YU毕业证)约克大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(YU毕业证)约克大学毕业证成绩单
 
一比一原版(UofM毕业证)明尼苏达大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UofM毕业证)明尼苏达大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(UofM毕业证)明尼苏达大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UofM毕业证)明尼苏达大学毕业证成绩单
 
Opendatabay - Open Data Marketplace.pptx
Opendatabay - Open Data Marketplace.pptxOpendatabay - Open Data Marketplace.pptx
Opendatabay - Open Data Marketplace.pptx
 
一比一原版(RUG毕业证)格罗宁根大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(RUG毕业证)格罗宁根大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(RUG毕业证)格罗宁根大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(RUG毕业证)格罗宁根大学毕业证成绩单
 
1.Seydhcuxhxyxhccuuxuxyxyxmisolids 2019.pptx
1.Seydhcuxhxyxhccuuxuxyxyxmisolids 2019.pptx1.Seydhcuxhxyxhccuuxuxyxyxmisolids 2019.pptx
1.Seydhcuxhxyxhccuuxuxyxyxmisolids 2019.pptx
 
一比一原版(CU毕业证)卡尔顿大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(CU毕业证)卡尔顿大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(CU毕业证)卡尔顿大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(CU毕业证)卡尔顿大学毕业证成绩单
 
一比一原版(CBU毕业证)卡普顿大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(CBU毕业证)卡普顿大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(CBU毕业证)卡普顿大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(CBU毕业证)卡普顿大学毕业证成绩单
 
一比一原版(IIT毕业证)伊利诺伊理工大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(IIT毕业证)伊利诺伊理工大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(IIT毕业证)伊利诺伊理工大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(IIT毕业证)伊利诺伊理工大学毕业证成绩单
 
Jpolillo Amazon PPC - Bid Optimization Sample
Jpolillo Amazon PPC - Bid Optimization SampleJpolillo Amazon PPC - Bid Optimization Sample
Jpolillo Amazon PPC - Bid Optimization Sample
 
Tabula.io Cheatsheet: automate your data workflows
Tabula.io Cheatsheet: automate your data workflowsTabula.io Cheatsheet: automate your data workflows
Tabula.io Cheatsheet: automate your data workflows
 
一比一原版(TWU毕业证)西三一大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(TWU毕业证)西三一大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(TWU毕业证)西三一大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(TWU毕业证)西三一大学毕业证成绩单
 
Adjusting primitives for graph : SHORT REPORT / NOTES
Adjusting primitives for graph : SHORT REPORT / NOTESAdjusting primitives for graph : SHORT REPORT / NOTES
Adjusting primitives for graph : SHORT REPORT / NOTES
 
做(mqu毕业证书)麦考瑞大学毕业证硕士文凭证书学费发票原版一模一样
做(mqu毕业证书)麦考瑞大学毕业证硕士文凭证书学费发票原版一模一样做(mqu毕业证书)麦考瑞大学毕业证硕士文凭证书学费发票原版一模一样
做(mqu毕业证书)麦考瑞大学毕业证硕士文凭证书学费发票原版一模一样
 
The affect of service quality and online reviews on customer loyalty in the E...
The affect of service quality and online reviews on customer loyalty in the E...The affect of service quality and online reviews on customer loyalty in the E...
The affect of service quality and online reviews on customer loyalty in the E...
 
一比一原版(UMich毕业证)密歇根大学|安娜堡分校毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UMich毕业证)密歇根大学|安娜堡分校毕业证成绩单一比一原版(UMich毕业证)密歇根大学|安娜堡分校毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UMich毕业证)密歇根大学|安娜堡分校毕业证成绩单
 
一比一原版(CBU毕业证)不列颠海角大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(CBU毕业证)不列颠海角大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(CBU毕业证)不列颠海角大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(CBU毕业证)不列颠海角大学毕业证成绩单
 

Quantitative method compare means test (independent and paired)

  • 1. Quantitative Methods Compare Means Test (T-test) Independent samples and Paired samples Keiko Ono, Ph.D. (2005)
  • 2. Two-Samples Compare Means Test (aka Independent-Samples Compare Means Test) Compare X by (Group) • Compare group 1 to group2 • Ha: X1 bar > X2 bar OR X1 bar < X2 bar Ho: X1 bar = X2 bar • Assumption: two subsamples were drawn independently • Sample size equality not necessary • Test variable: must be interval • Group variable: categorical, ordinal, interval
  • 3. Two-Samples Compare Means Test (aka Independent-Samples Compare Means Test) • Compare Democrats and Republicans • Compare Men and Women • Compare Experimental group and Control group • Compare drug and placebo • Compare Brand A and Brand B • Compare and
  • 4. Two-Samples Compare Means Test (aka Independent-Samples Compare Means Test) • Compare between two groups when there are more than two groups → e.g. Liberal (coded “1”), Moderate (coded “3”), Conservative (coded “5”). To compare liberals and conservatives, specify Group1 = 1, Group 2 = 5
  • 5. Two-Samples Compare Means Test (aka Independent-Samples Compare Means Test) • Compare between groups based on interval level variable e.g. Feeling thermometer score for feminists Group 1: respondents 30-years or older Group 2: under 30 (“cutoff” value would be 30). Group Statistics 1207 53.62 22.060 .635 213 58.97 20.954 1.436 Respondent age >= 30 < 30 Thermometer feminists N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Independent Samples Test .040 .842 -3.283 1418 .001 -5.342 1.627 -8.535 -2.150 -3.403 301.023 .001 -5.342 1.570 -8.432 -2.253 Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Thermometer feminists F Sig. Levene's Test for Equality of Variances t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error Difference Lower Upper 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference t-test for Equality of Means
  • 6. PID Bush FT 1 D 20 2 R 70 3 D 15 4 D 35 5 R 85 6 R 70 7 D 50 8 R 90 9 R 65 n=9 Two-Samples Compare Means Test (aka Independent-Samples Compare Means Test)
  • 7. PID Bush FT 1 D 20 2 R 70 3 D 15 4 D 35 5 R 85 6 R 70 7 D 50 8 R 90 9 R 65 n=9 Sample 1 (Democrats) n1=4 X1 bar= 30 s1=15.8 Two-Samples Compare Means Test (aka Independent-Samples Compare Means Test)
  • 8. PID Bush FT 1 D 20 2 R 70 3 D 15 4 D 35 5 R 85 6 R 70 7 D 50 8 R 90 9 R 65 n=9 Sample 2 (Republicans) n2=5 X2 bar= 76 s2 = 10.8 Two-Samples Compare Means Test (aka Independent-Samples Compare Means Test) Sample 1 (Democrats) n1=4 X1 bar= 30 s1=15.8
  • 9. Two-Samples Compare Means Test (aka Independent-Samples Compare Means Test) Equal variance assumed (Tomlinson)
  • 10. Two-Samples Compare Means Test Example 1. Do men and women feel differently about the military? (NES 2000) Group Statistics 665 73.25 20.860 .809 852 72.19 20.130 .690 Gender 1. Male 2. Female Post:Thermometer military N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
  • 11. Two-Samples Compare Means Test Example 1. Do men and women feel differently about the military? (NES 2000) Group Statistics 665 73.25 20.860 .809 852 72.19 20.130 .690 Gender 1. Male 2. Female Post:Thermometer military N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Independent Samples Test .272 .602 1.001 1515 .317 1.060 1.058 -1.016 3.136 .997 1402.109 .319 1.060 1.063 -1.025 3.145 Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Post:Thermometer military F Sig. Levene's Test for Equality of Variances t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error Difference Lower Upper 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference t-test for Equality of Means
  • 12. Two-Samples Compare Means Test Example 1. Do men and women feel differently about the military? (NES 2000) Group Statistics 665 73.25 20.860 .809 852 72.19 20.130 .690 Gender 1. Male 2. Female Post:Thermometer military N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Independent Samples Test .272 .602 1.001 1515 .317 1.060 1.058 -1.016 3.136 .997 1402.109 .319 1.060 1.063 -1.025 3.145 Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Post:Thermometer military F Sig. Levene's Test for Equality of Variances t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error Difference Lower Upper 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference t-test for Equality of Means Confidence Interval
  • 13. Two-Samples Compare Means Test Example 1. Do men and women feel differently about the military? (NES 2000) Group Statistics 665 73.25 20.860 .809 852 72.19 20.130 .690 Gender 1. Male 2. Female Post:Thermometer military N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Independent Samples Test .272 .602 1.001 1515 .317 1.060 1.058 -1.016 3.136 .997 1402.109 .319 1.060 1.063 -1.025 3.145 Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Post:Thermometer military F Sig. Levene's Test for Equality of Variances t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error Difference Lower Upper 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference t-test for Equality of Means Critical value of t = 1.96 t = Mean difference / S.E. of Difference
  • 14. Two-Samples Compare Means Test Example 1. Do men and women feel differently about the military? (NES 2000) Group Statistics 665 73.25 20.860 .809 852 72.19 20.130 .690 Gender 1. Male 2. Female Post:Thermometer military N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Independent Samples Test .272 .602 1.001 1515 .317 1.060 1.058 -1.016 3.136 .997 1402.109 .319 1.060 1.063 -1.025 3.145 Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Post:Thermometer military F Sig. Levene's Test for Equality of Variances t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error Difference Lower Upper 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference t-test for Equality of Means P-value At 95% confidence level, critical value of p (2-tailed) is .05. If one-tailed, divide by half (.025).
  • 15. Two-Samples Compare Means Test Example 1. Do men and women feel differently about the military? (NES 2000) Group Statistics 665 73.25 20.860 .809 852 72.19 20.130 .690 Gender 1. Male 2. Female Post:Thermometer military N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Independent Samples Test .272 .602 1.001 1515 .317 1.060 1.058 -1.016 3.136 .997 1402.109 .319 1.060 1.063 -1.025 3.145 Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Post:Thermometer military F Sig. Levene's Test for Equality of Variances t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error Difference Lower Upper 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference t-test for Equality of Means P-value
  • 16. Group Statistics 659 61.93 22.127 .862 825 66.20 20.482 .713 Gender 1. Male 2. Female D2t. Thermometer environmentalists N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Independent Samples Test 1.430 .232 -3.852 1482 .000 -4.272 1.109 -6.447 -2.096 -3.819 1358.693 .000 -4.272 1.119 -6.466 -2.077 Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed D2t. Thermometer environmentalists F Sig. Levene's Test for Equality of Variances t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error Difference Lower Upper 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference t-test for Equality of Means Two-Samples Compare Means Test Example 2. Do men and women feel differently about environmentalists? (NES 2000)
  • 17. Group Statistics 659 61.93 22.127 .862 825 66.20 20.482 .713 Gender 1. Male 2. Female D2t. Thermometer environmentalists N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Independent Samples Test 1.430 .232 -3.852 1482 .000 -4.272 1.109 -6.447 -2.096 -3.819 1358.693 .000 -4.272 1.119 -6.466 -2.077 Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed D2t. Thermometer environmentalists F Sig. Levene's Test for Equality of Variances t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error Difference Lower Upper 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference t-test for Equality of Means Two-Samples Compare Means Test Example 2. Do men and women feel differently about environmentalists? (NES 2000) P-value
  • 18. Compare Means test – Paired Samples Independent Samples Compare Means Test dealt with comparing two independent groups (men vs. women, Democrat vs. Republican, etc.) Paired Samples test involves comparing traits/characteristics of matched observations. What does this mean?
  • 19. • Compare before and after new treatment, new drug, new law, etc. • Compare t1 and t2 (e.g. GDP in 2005 and GDP in 2000 across countries, the unit of analysis is the country) • Compare average male and female test scores across schools (the unit of analysis: school) • Compare opinions and evaluations of different objects (the unit of analysis: survey respondent) Paired-Samples Compare Means Test
  • 20. Independent Samples Compare Means Test On average, are men more (or less) favorable toward Clinton than women? Respondent Sex Clinton Gore Andy M 70 50 Matt M 60 45 Richard M 30 50 Dave M 25 40 Elaine F 50 60 Julia F 70 65 Rachel F 50 40 Margaret F 35 55 Male Mean Female Mean
  • 21. What’s wrong with this picture? Respondent Clinton Rating Gore Rating Andy 70 Elaine 60 Can we conclude Clinton is more popular (even with increased n) based on this set of data? No…because of Natural Variability
  • 22. Paired Samples Compare Means Test On average, is Clinton rating different from Gore rating? Respondent Sex Clinton Gore Andy M 70 50 Matt M 60 45 Richard M 30 50 Dave M 25 40 Elaine F 50 60 Julia F 70 65 Rachel F 50 40 Margaret F 35 55
  • 23. To test the hypothesis, we use the difference between the two original variables. Respondent Sex Clinton Gore C-G Andy M 70 50 20 Matt M 60 45 15 Richard M 30 50 -20 Dave M 25 40 -15 Elaine F 50 60 -10 Julia F 70 65 5 Rachel F 50 40 10 Margaret F 35 55 -20
  • 24. To test the hypothesis, we use the difference between the two original variables. Respondent Sex Clinton Gore C-G Andy M 70 50 20 Matt M 60 45 15 Richard M 30 50 -20 Dave M 25 40 -15 Elaine F 50 60 -10 Julia F 70 65 5 Rachel F 50 40 10 Margaret F 35 55 -20 Ho: X bar = 0 Ha: X bar<0 or Xbar >0
  • 25. The Logic of paired samples test Say someone has developed a new kind of hand cream. She claims the new cream is far superior to the conventional one. How do we test this proposition? OLD NEW
  • 26. One way is to assign the old cream to one group of experimental subjects and give the new one to another group. However, there is natural variability due to skin differences among research subjects.
  • 27. In other words, our hands are different from our neighbors’. So, a better way to test the difference between the two brands is…
  • 28. Randomly assign the two brands to each subject’s right or left hands! This eliminates variability due to skin differences.
  • 29. Randomly assign the two brands to each subject’s right or left hands! This eliminates variability due to skin differences.
  • 30. Paired-Samples Compare Means Test Example Which gives better mileage, Gasoline A or Gasoline B?
  • 31. Paired-Samples Compare Means Test Better mileage, Gasoline A or Gasoline B? Taxi # Gasoline mileage 1 A 25.6 2 A 32.4 3 A 28.6 4 A 31.2 5 A 29.8 6 A 27.9 7 B 24.9 8 B 26.7 9 B 30.6 10 B 29.8 11 B 30.7 12 B 28.4 One method is to randomly assign gasoline A or B to cars and compare the means. Gasoline A Mean Gasoline B Mean
  • 32. Paired-Samples Compare Means Test Better mileage, Gasoline A or Gasoline B? Problem: Natural variability in driving habits and conditions of the car
  • 33. Paired-Samples Compare Means Test A better method is to assign gasoline A and B to the same cars and compare the means. Taxi # Gasoline A Gasoline B 1 25.6 24.9 2 32.4 26.7 3 28.6 31.2 4 31.2 30.7 5 29.8 29.5 6 27.9 28.7 7 25.9 30.6 8 26.5 28.4 9 31.3 25.7 10 29.5 29.4 11 31.2 32.8 12 28.8 25.2
  • 34. Paired-Samples Compare Means Test We hypothesize if there were no difference between Gasoline A and Gasoline B, on average, the difference would be zero (this is the null hypothesis). Taxi # Gasoline A Gasoline B Difference (A-B) 1 25.6 24.9 0.7 2 32.4 26.7 5.7 3 28.6 31.2 -2.6 4 31.2 30.7 0.5 5 29.8 29.5 0.3 6 27.9 28.7 -0.8 7 25.9 30.6 -4.7 8 26.5 28.4 -1.9 9 31.3 25.7 5.6 10 29.5 29.4 0.1 11 31.2 32.8 -1.6 12 28.8 25.2 3.6
  • 35. Paired-Samples Compare Means Test We hypothesize if there were no difference between Gasoline A and Gasoline B, on average, the difference would be zero (this is the null hypothesis). Taxi # Gasoline A Gasoline B Difference (A-B) 1 25.6 24.9 0.7 2 32.4 26.7 5.7 3 28.6 31.2 -2.6 4 31.2 30.7 0.5 5 29.8 29.5 0.3 6 27.9 28.7 -0.8 7 25.9 30.6 -4.7 8 26.5 28.4 -1.9 9 31.3 25.7 5.6 10 29.5 29.4 0.1 11 31.2 32.8 -1.6 12 28.8 25.2 3.6 Ho: X bar = 0 Ha: X bar<0 or Xbar >0
  • 36. Paired-Samples Compare Means Test Example Paired Samples Statistics 55.43 1771 29.675 .705 57.57 1771 25.663 .610 Pre:Thermometer Bill Clinton Pre:Thermometer Al Gore Pair 1 Mean N Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Paired Samples Correlations 1771 .720 .000 Pre:Thermometer Bill Clinton & Pre:Thermometer Al Gore Pair 1 N Correlation Sig. Paired Samples Test -2.141 21.042 .500 -3.121 -1.160 -4.281 1770 .000 Pre:Thermometer Bill Clinton - Pre:Thermometer Al Gore Pair 1 Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Paired Differences t df Sig. (2-tailed)
  • 37. Paired-Samples Compare Means Test Example Paired Samples Statistics 55.43 1771 29.675 .705 57.57 1771 25.663 .610 Pre:Thermometer Bill Clinton Pre:Thermometer Al Gore Pair 1 Mean N Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Paired Samples Correlations 1771 .720 .000 Pre:Thermometer Bill Clinton & Pre:Thermometer Al Gore Pair 1 N Correlation Sig. Paired Samples Test -2.141 21.042 .500 -3.121 -1.160 -4.281 1770 .000 Pre:Thermometer Bill Clinton - Pre:Thermometer Al Gore Pair 1 Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Paired Differences t df Sig. (2-tailed) Confidence Interval P-value t = (mean of difference / (S.D. of difference/√n))
  • 38. • Compare before and after new treatment, new drug, new law, etc. • Compare t1 and t2 (e.g. GDP in 2005 and GDP in 2000 across countries, the unit of analysis is the country) • Compare average male and female test scores across schools (the unit of analysis: school) • Compare opinions and evaluations of different objects (the unit of analysis: survey respondent) Paired-Samples Compare Means Test
  • 39. GDP 2000 GDP 2005 D Chile Mexico Argentina Ecuador Peru Columbia Venezuela Cholesterol Level Before drug After drug D Patient A Patient B Patient C Patient D Patient E Patient F Patient G Patient H Paired-Samples Compare Means Test Average SAT scores Female Male D OU Texas Kansas Missouri Nebraska Texas A&M Rice Arkansas