SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 65
Two-way Between-
Subjects ANOVA
Two-way ANOVA
 Two-way ANOVA is one type of Factorial
ANOVA.
 Factorial ANOVAs are designs with two or
more between-subjects independent variables
 If there are within-subjects IVs, then they are
often called Mixed ANOVAs
Two-way ANOVA
 Grouping factors (IVs)
 Example
 IV: experience with three levels - rookie, novice, and veteran
 IV: pitcher type with two levels - starter and relief
 DV: physical stamina
 3 X 2 factorial design
 Computes a separate F ratio for each independent variable
(called main effects) and the interaction between the variables
 F for experience
 F for pitcher type
 F for experience*pitch interaction
Example: 3 X 2 Factorial Design
Group 1 Group 2
Group 3 Group 4
Starter Relief
Group 5 Group 6
rookie
novice
veteran
Experience
Level
Pitcher Type
Practice
 A 3 X 3 design
 How many independent variables?
1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
Practice
 A 3 X 3 design
 How many levels of the first independent
variable listed?
1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
Practice
 A 3 X 3 design
 How many conditions?
1. 2
2. 3
3. 6
4. 9
Practice
 A researcher tests male and female doctors
for manual dexterity . She tests dexterity for
different tools: scalpel, scissors, scope, and
probe.
 How many independent variables?
1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
Practice
 A researcher tests male and female doctors for
manual dexterity . She tests dexterity for different
tools: scalpel, scissors, scope, and probe.
 How many levels of the second independent variable
(tools)?
1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
Practice
 A researcher tests male and female doctors
for manual dexterity . She tests dexterity for
different tools: scalpel, scissors, scope, and
probe.
 How many conditions?
1. 2
2. 4
3. 6
4. 8
Practice
 You are studying factors that are associated with problem-
solving skills. You place subjects into groups according to the
following: student involvement with extracurricular activities
(involved vs. not involved), student university type (public
vs. private), and student self-reported procrastination (high,
medium, and low). You then test the students’ problem-
solving ability with a test.
 What is the design?
1. 1 X 2 X 2 X 3
2. 2 X 2 X 3
3. 3 X 2 X 6
4. 4 X 3
Practice
 You are studying factors that are associated with problem-
solving skills. You place subjects into groups according to the
following: student involvement with extracurricular activities
(involved vs. not involved), student university type (public
vs. private), and student self-reported procrastination (high,
medium, and low). You then test the students’ problem-
solving ability with a test.
 How many independent variables?
1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
Practice
 You are studying factors that are associated with problem-
solving skills. You place subjects into groups according to the
following: student involvement with extracurricular activities
(involved vs. not involved), student university type (public
vs. private), and student self-reported procrastination (high,
medium, and low). You then test the students’ problem-
solving ability with a test.
 How many cells?
1. 3
2. 8
3. 12
4. 24
Two-way ANOVA
 Main Effects
 Think of them as one-way ANOVAs for each
independent variable.
 If you have 2 IVs, then you have two possible
main effects
 Example
 A main effect for experience would look at the
three levels ignoring (collapsed across) pitcher type
 A main effect for pitcher type looks at starters vs.
relief pitchers regardless of (collapsed across)
experience
Group 1 Group 2
Group 3 Group 4
Starter Relief
Group 5 Group 6
rookie
novice
veteran
Experience
Level
Pitcher Type
Marginal Mean
For Rookie
Marginal Mean
For Novice
Marginal Mean
For Veteran
Marginal Mean
For Starter
Marginal Mean
For Relief
Two-way ANOVA
 Interaction
 For a two-way ANOVA there is one possible interaction
 Interactions occur if the effects of one IV are different
under different levels of the other IV
 Example
 Something about being an expert makes you behave differently if
you are a starter as opposed to being a relief pitcher.
 As the number of factors increases, the number of
possible interaction increases
Practice
 You are studying factors that are associated with problem-
solving skills. You place subjects into groups according to the
following: student involvement with extracurricular activities
(involved vs. not involved), student university type (public
vs. private), and student self-reported procrastination (high,
medium, and low). You then test the students’ problem-
solving ability with a test.
 How many main effects are possible?
1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
Practice
 You are studying factors that are associated with problem-
solving skills. You place subjects into groups according to the
following: student involvement with extracurricular activities
(involved vs. not involved), student university type (public
vs. private), and student self-reported procrastination (high,
medium, and low). You then test the students’ problem-
solving ability with a test.
 How many interactions are possible?
1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
Two-way ANOVA
 Identifying main effects and interactions
 First test for significance (will discuss how that is done
later)
 Then use either table or graph to see the relationship that
exists between variables
 For instructional purposes we will assume the tests for
significance have been done and that the main effects and
interactions identified are significant
 Remember if not significant than no exploration of that
particular main effect or interaction.
Group 1 Group 2
Group 3 Group 4
Starter Relief
rookie
veteranExperience
Level
Pitcher Type
Marginal Mean
For Rookie
Marginal Mean
For Veteran
Marginal Mean
For Starter
Marginal Mean
For Relief
No Main Effects or Interaction
20 20
Starter Relief
rookie
veteran
20
20 20 20
20 20
0
5
10
15
20
25
rookie veteran
starter
relief
Main Effect for Experience
10 10
Starter Relief
rookie
veteran
10
20 20 20
15 15
0
5
10
15
20
25
rookie veteran
starter
relief
Main Effect for Pitcher Type
20 10
Starter Relief
rookie
veteran
15
20 10 15
20 10
0
5
10
15
20
25
rookie veteran
starter
relief
Two Main Effects
20 15
Starter Relief
rookie
veteran
17.5
15 10 12.5
17.5 12.5
0
5
10
15
20
25
rookie veteran
starter
relief
Interaction with No Main Effects
20 10
Starter Relief
rookie
veteran
15
10 20 15
15 15
0
5
10
15
20
25
rookie veteran
starter
relief
Interaction and Main Effect for
Experience
20 15
Starter Relief
rookie
veteran
17.5
10 15 12.5
15 15
0
5
10
15
20
25
rookie veteran
starter
relief
Interaction and Main Effect for
Pitcher Type
20 10
Starter Relief
rookie
veteran
15
15 15 15
17.5 12.5
0
5
10
15
20
25
rookie veteran
starter
relief
Interaction and Two Main Effects
9 11
Starter Relief
rookie
veteran
10
28 12 20
16 14
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
rookie veteran
starter
relief
Assumptions of Between
Factor ANOVAs
 DV data are interval or ratio level
 Data are normally distributed
 Variances are equivalent
(homogeneity of variance)
 Independence of observations
 Same statistical ratio
ANOVA =
Treatment Variance
Error Variance
Stating Hypotheses
 Two levels of hypotheses
 Main effects
 Hypothesis for each IV
 Hypothesis for Main Effect A (also sometimes called
Main Effect Row)
 Ho: μ1 = μ2 …
 Ha: not all of the μi are equal.
 Hypothesis for Main Effect B (also sometimes called
Main Effect Column)
 Ho: μ1 = μ2 …
 Ha: not all of the μi are equal.
Stating Hypotheses
 Hypothesis for Interaction (sometimes written
A*B or Row*Column)
 Hypothesis for each combination of IVs
 Ho: There is no interaction between factors A and
B. All differences are explained by main effects.
 Ha: There is an interaction. The mean difference
between treatments are not what would be
predicted from main effects only
Partitioning
 One-Way Subjects
 SSbetween
 SSwithin
 Two-Way Subjects
 SSbetween (divided up)
 SSrow
 SScolumn
 SSrow*column
 SSwithin
Computation
N
G
X
2
2
)()()(
222222
N
G
n
T
N
G
n
T
N
G
n
T
column
column
row
row
SStotal
formula df
N - 1
SSrow
SScolumn
SSrow*column
N
G
n
T
row
row
22
SSwithin SStotal – SSrow – SScolumn – SS row*column
a – 1
Where a is
number of rows
b – 1
Where b is
number of columns
(a – 1)(b – 1)
(a)(b)(n-1)
N
G
n
T
column
column
22
Example
Starter Relief
Rookie 4
3
3
5
1
0
2
1
Veteran 3
2
1
2
2
3
1
1
Calculate the means for each of
these cells
Rookie/Starter 3.75
Rookie/Relief 1
Veteran/Starter 2
Veteran/Relief 1.75
What are the Total df?
Source SS df MS F
Main Effect for Row 9.00
Main Effect for Column 1.00
Interaction 6.25
Error
(within groups)
9.50
Total 25.75
What are the Total df?
Source SS df MS F
Main Effect for Row 9.00
Main Effect for Column 1.00
Interaction 6.25
Error
(within groups)
9.50
Total 25.75 15
What are the df row?
Source SS df MS F
Main Effect for Row 9.00
Main Effect for Column 1.00
Interaction 6.25
Error
(within groups)
9.50
Total 25.75 15
What are the df row?
Source SS df MS F
Main Effect for Row 9.00 1
Main Effect for Column 1.00
Interaction 6.25
Error
(within groups)
9.50
Total 25.75 15
What are the df column?
Source SS df MS F
Main Effect for Row 9.00 1
Main Effect for Column 1.00
Interaction 6.25
Error
(within groups)
9.50
Total 25.75 15
What are the df column?
Source SS df MS F
Main Effect for Row 9.00 1
Main Effect for Column 1.00 1
Interaction 6.25
Error
(within groups)
9.50
Total 25.75 15
What are the df interaction?
Source SS df MS F
Main Effect for Row 9.00 1
Main Effect for Column 1.00 1
Interaction 6.25
Error
(within groups)
9.50
Total 25.75 15
What are the df interaction?
Source SS df MS F
Main Effect for Row 9.00 1
Main Effect for Column 1.00 1
Interaction 6.25 1
Error
(within groups)
9.50
Total 25.75 15
What are the df error?
Source SS df MS F
Main Effect for Row 9.00 1
Main Effect for Column 1.00 1
Interaction 6.25 1
Error
(within groups)
9.50
Total 25.75 15
What are the df error?
Source SS df MS F
Main Effect for Row 9.00 1
Main Effect for Column 1.00 1
Interaction 6.25 1
Error
(within groups)
9.50 12
Total 25.75 15
What is the MS for row?
Source SS df MS F
Main Effect for Row 9.00 1
Main Effect for Column 1.00 1
Interaction 6.25 1
Error
(within groups)
9.50 12
Total 25.75 15
What is the MS for row?
Source SS df MS F
Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00
Main Effect for Column 1.00 1
Interaction 6.25 1
Error
(within groups)
9.50 12
Total 25.75 15
What is the MS for column?
Source SS df MS F
Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00
Main Effect for Column 1.00 1
Interaction 6.25 1
Error
(within groups)
9.50 12
Total 25.75 15
What is the MS for column?
Source SS df MS F
Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00
Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 1.00
Interaction 6.25 1
Error
(within groups)
9.50 12
Total 25.75 15
What is the MS interaction?
Source SS df MS F
Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00
Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 1.00
Interaction 6.25 1
Error
(within groups)
9.50 12
Total 25.75 15
What is the MS interaction?
Source SS df MS F
Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00
Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 1.00
Interaction 6.25 1 6.25
Error
(within groups)
9.50 12
Total 25.75 15
What is the MS error?
Source SS df MS F
Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00
Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 1.00
Interaction 6.25 1 6.25
Error
(within groups)
9.50 12
Total 25.75 15
What is the MS error?
Source SS df MS F
Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00
Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 1.00
Interaction 6.25 1 6.25
Error
(within groups)
9.50 12 0.79
Total 25.75 15
What is the main effect for row?
Source SS df MS F
Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00
Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 1.00
Interaction 6.25 1 6.25
Error
(within groups)
9.50 12 0.79
Total 25.75 15
What is the main effect for row?
Source SS df MS F
Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00 11.37
Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 1.00
Interaction 6.25 1 6.25
Error
(within groups)
9.50 12 0.79
Total 25.75 15
What is the main effect for column?
Source SS df MS F
Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00 11.37
Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 1.00
Interaction 6.25 1 6.25
Error
(within groups)
9.50 12 0.79
Total 25.75 15
What is the main effect for column?
Source SS df MS F
Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00 11.37
Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 1.00 1.26
Interaction 6.25 1 6.25
Error
(within groups)
9.50 12 0.79
Total 25.75 15
What is the interaction?
Source SS df MS F
Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00 11.37
Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 1.00 1.26
Interaction 6.25 1 6.25
Error
(within groups)
9.50 12 0.79
Total 25.75 15
What is the interaction?
Source SS df MS F
Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00 11.37
Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 1.00 1.26
Interaction 6.25 1 6.25 7.90
Error
(within groups)
9.50 12 0.79
Total 25.75 15
Example
 Critical Value
 For each test use the df associated with it.
 Is not necessarily the same for all three tests
although in our example it is.
 4.747
 Evaluate each effect separately
 Is Main Effect row sig?
 Yes
 No
 Is Main Effect column sig?
 Yes
 No
 Is Interaction sig?
 Yes
 No
Now what?
 If you have no significant interaction, then
you can talk about what main effects are
significant in the same way that you evaluated
one-way ANOVAs.
 If the interaction is significant you must be
careful interpreting main effects. The main
effect could be present simply because of the
interaction. So concentrate on the interaction
interpretation.
Now what?
 If it is a 2X2 ANOVA and the interaction is
significant then graph the means and interpret.
 Our example
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
starter relief
rookie
veteran
Now what?
 If interaction is significant
 Plot interaction
 Interpret interaction
 Level of one IV is influenced by level of a
second IV
 If Main Effects are significant
 Conduct Post Hoc tests
 Report results
 Effect sizes
• Use omega squared to report effect size

More Related Content

What's hot

Analysis of variance ppt @ bec doms
Analysis of variance ppt @ bec domsAnalysis of variance ppt @ bec doms
Analysis of variance ppt @ bec domsBabasab Patil
 
One Way Anova
One Way AnovaOne Way Anova
One Way Anovashoffma5
 
Introduction to ANOVAs
Introduction to ANOVAsIntroduction to ANOVAs
Introduction to ANOVAsflorentinoz
 
T-Test for Correlated Groups by STR Grp. 2
T-Test for Correlated Groups by STR Grp. 2T-Test for Correlated Groups by STR Grp. 2
T-Test for Correlated Groups by STR Grp. 2Oj Acopiado
 
Quantitative method compare means test (independent and paired)
Quantitative method compare means test (independent and paired)Quantitative method compare means test (independent and paired)
Quantitative method compare means test (independent and paired)Keiko Ono
 
Application of ANOVA
Application of ANOVAApplication of ANOVA
Application of ANOVARohit Patidar
 
7 anova chi square test
 7 anova chi square test 7 anova chi square test
7 anova chi square testPenny Jiang
 
Research method ch08 statistical methods 2 anova
Research method ch08 statistical methods 2 anovaResearch method ch08 statistical methods 2 anova
Research method ch08 statistical methods 2 anovanaranbatn
 
Analysis Of Variance - ANOVA
Analysis Of Variance - ANOVAAnalysis Of Variance - ANOVA
Analysis Of Variance - ANOVASaumya Bhatnagar
 
Anova single factor
Anova single factorAnova single factor
Anova single factorDhruv Patel
 
Two-way Repeated Measures ANOVA
Two-way Repeated Measures ANOVATwo-way Repeated Measures ANOVA
Two-way Repeated Measures ANOVAJ P Verma
 
Anova (f test) and mean differentiation
Anova (f test) and mean differentiationAnova (f test) and mean differentiation
Anova (f test) and mean differentiationSubramani Parasuraman
 
Repeated Measures ANOVA - Overview
Repeated Measures ANOVA - OverviewRepeated Measures ANOVA - Overview
Repeated Measures ANOVA - OverviewSr Edith Bogue
 
Applied statistics lecture_8
Applied statistics lecture_8Applied statistics lecture_8
Applied statistics lecture_8Daria Bogdanova
 

What's hot (20)

Analysis of variance ppt @ bec doms
Analysis of variance ppt @ bec domsAnalysis of variance ppt @ bec doms
Analysis of variance ppt @ bec doms
 
Unit 4
Unit 4Unit 4
Unit 4
 
One Way Anova
One Way AnovaOne Way Anova
One Way Anova
 
Introduction to ANOVAs
Introduction to ANOVAsIntroduction to ANOVAs
Introduction to ANOVAs
 
T-Test for Correlated Groups by STR Grp. 2
T-Test for Correlated Groups by STR Grp. 2T-Test for Correlated Groups by STR Grp. 2
T-Test for Correlated Groups by STR Grp. 2
 
Quantitative method compare means test (independent and paired)
Quantitative method compare means test (independent and paired)Quantitative method compare means test (independent and paired)
Quantitative method compare means test (independent and paired)
 
Application of ANOVA
Application of ANOVAApplication of ANOVA
Application of ANOVA
 
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA)
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA)ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA)
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA)
 
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
 
Anova (1)
Anova (1)Anova (1)
Anova (1)
 
7 anova chi square test
 7 anova chi square test 7 anova chi square test
7 anova chi square test
 
Research method ch08 statistical methods 2 anova
Research method ch08 statistical methods 2 anovaResearch method ch08 statistical methods 2 anova
Research method ch08 statistical methods 2 anova
 
ANOVA II
ANOVA IIANOVA II
ANOVA II
 
Analysis Of Variance - ANOVA
Analysis Of Variance - ANOVAAnalysis Of Variance - ANOVA
Analysis Of Variance - ANOVA
 
Anova single factor
Anova single factorAnova single factor
Anova single factor
 
Factorial ANOVA
Factorial ANOVAFactorial ANOVA
Factorial ANOVA
 
Two-way Repeated Measures ANOVA
Two-way Repeated Measures ANOVATwo-way Repeated Measures ANOVA
Two-way Repeated Measures ANOVA
 
Anova (f test) and mean differentiation
Anova (f test) and mean differentiationAnova (f test) and mean differentiation
Anova (f test) and mean differentiation
 
Repeated Measures ANOVA - Overview
Repeated Measures ANOVA - OverviewRepeated Measures ANOVA - Overview
Repeated Measures ANOVA - Overview
 
Applied statistics lecture_8
Applied statistics lecture_8Applied statistics lecture_8
Applied statistics lecture_8
 

Viewers also liked

Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)Sneh Kumari
 
Topic 14 maternal education
Topic 14 maternal educationTopic 14 maternal education
Topic 14 maternal educationSizwan Ahammed
 
Oneway ANOVA - Overview
Oneway ANOVA - OverviewOneway ANOVA - Overview
Oneway ANOVA - OverviewSr Edith Bogue
 
General Factor Factorial Design
General Factor Factorial DesignGeneral Factor Factorial Design
General Factor Factorial DesignNoraziah Ismail
 
Imad Feneir - Two-way ANOVA - replication
Imad Feneir - Two-way ANOVA - replicationImad Feneir - Two-way ANOVA - replication
Imad Feneir - Two-way ANOVA - replicationImad Feneir
 
Writing up your results – apa style guidelines
Writing up your results – apa style guidelinesWriting up your results – apa style guidelines
Writing up your results – apa style guidelinesMarialena Kostouli
 
Null hypothesis for a Factorial ANOVA
Null hypothesis for a Factorial ANOVANull hypothesis for a Factorial ANOVA
Null hypothesis for a Factorial ANOVAKen Plummer
 
Multiple regression presentation
Multiple regression presentationMultiple regression presentation
Multiple regression presentationCarlo Magno
 
Regression analysis ppt
Regression analysis pptRegression analysis ppt
Regression analysis pptElkana Rorio
 
Reporting a Factorial ANOVA
Reporting a Factorial ANOVAReporting a Factorial ANOVA
Reporting a Factorial ANOVAKen Plummer
 
Reporting a one-way anova
Reporting a one-way anovaReporting a one-way anova
Reporting a one-way anovaKen Plummer
 
Reporting a one way repeated measures anova
Reporting a one way repeated measures anovaReporting a one way repeated measures anova
Reporting a one way repeated measures anovaKen Plummer
 
33 deputados norte-americanos criticam o golpe
33 deputados norte-americanos criticam o golpe33 deputados norte-americanos criticam o golpe
33 deputados norte-americanos criticam o golpeMiguel Rosario
 
Seko profile n-networking_racks
Seko profile n-networking_racksSeko profile n-networking_racks
Seko profile n-networking_racksvasudeva yaragatti
 
Cara Set Up FTP server di ubuntu
Cara Set Up FTP server di ubuntuCara Set Up FTP server di ubuntu
Cara Set Up FTP server di ubuntuRobby Firmansyah
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
 
Two way anova+manova
Two way anova+manovaTwo way anova+manova
Two way anova+manova
 
Factorial Design analysis
Factorial Design analysisFactorial Design analysis
Factorial Design analysis
 
Topic 14 maternal education
Topic 14 maternal educationTopic 14 maternal education
Topic 14 maternal education
 
Factorial anova
Factorial anovaFactorial anova
Factorial anova
 
Oneway ANOVA - Overview
Oneway ANOVA - OverviewOneway ANOVA - Overview
Oneway ANOVA - Overview
 
Chap10 anova
Chap10 anovaChap10 anova
Chap10 anova
 
General Factor Factorial Design
General Factor Factorial DesignGeneral Factor Factorial Design
General Factor Factorial Design
 
Imad Feneir - Two-way ANOVA - replication
Imad Feneir - Two-way ANOVA - replicationImad Feneir - Two-way ANOVA - replication
Imad Feneir - Two-way ANOVA - replication
 
Writing up your results – apa style guidelines
Writing up your results – apa style guidelinesWriting up your results – apa style guidelines
Writing up your results – apa style guidelines
 
Null hypothesis for a Factorial ANOVA
Null hypothesis for a Factorial ANOVANull hypothesis for a Factorial ANOVA
Null hypothesis for a Factorial ANOVA
 
Anova ppt
Anova pptAnova ppt
Anova ppt
 
Multiple regression presentation
Multiple regression presentationMultiple regression presentation
Multiple regression presentation
 
Regression analysis ppt
Regression analysis pptRegression analysis ppt
Regression analysis ppt
 
Reporting a Factorial ANOVA
Reporting a Factorial ANOVAReporting a Factorial ANOVA
Reporting a Factorial ANOVA
 
Reporting a one-way anova
Reporting a one-way anovaReporting a one-way anova
Reporting a one-way anova
 
Reporting a one way repeated measures anova
Reporting a one way repeated measures anovaReporting a one way repeated measures anova
Reporting a one way repeated measures anova
 
33 deputados norte-americanos criticam o golpe
33 deputados norte-americanos criticam o golpe33 deputados norte-americanos criticam o golpe
33 deputados norte-americanos criticam o golpe
 
Seko profile n-networking_racks
Seko profile n-networking_racksSeko profile n-networking_racks
Seko profile n-networking_racks
 
Cara Set Up FTP server di ubuntu
Cara Set Up FTP server di ubuntuCara Set Up FTP server di ubuntu
Cara Set Up FTP server di ubuntu
 

Similar to Chapter 10 2 way

WEEK 5 – EXERCISES Enter your answers in the spaces pr.docx
WEEK 5 – EXERCISES Enter your answers in the spaces pr.docxWEEK 5 – EXERCISES Enter your answers in the spaces pr.docx
WEEK 5 – EXERCISES Enter your answers in the spaces pr.docxpaynetawnya
 
Chapter 8 class version 2
Chapter 8 class version 2Chapter 8 class version 2
Chapter 8 class version 2jbnx
 
Criteria No Submission0 pointsEmerging (F through .docx
Criteria No Submission0 pointsEmerging (F through .docxCriteria No Submission0 pointsEmerging (F through .docx
Criteria No Submission0 pointsEmerging (F through .docxwillcoxjanay
 
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)Tesfamichael Getu
 
Research Methods in PsychologyQuasi-Experimental Designs.docx
Research Methods in PsychologyQuasi-Experimental Designs.docxResearch Methods in PsychologyQuasi-Experimental Designs.docx
Research Methods in PsychologyQuasi-Experimental Designs.docxaudeleypearl
 
Casteleyn playing with improv theatre to battle public speaking stress
Casteleyn playing with improv theatre to battle public speaking stressCasteleyn playing with improv theatre to battle public speaking stress
Casteleyn playing with improv theatre to battle public speaking stressJordi Casteleyn
 
Conducting a 3-Way ANOVAWhy ANOVA can be used to handle mult.docx
Conducting a 3-Way ANOVAWhy  ANOVA can be used to handle mult.docxConducting a 3-Way ANOVAWhy  ANOVA can be used to handle mult.docx
Conducting a 3-Way ANOVAWhy ANOVA can be used to handle mult.docxmaxinesmith73660
 
Using the data in the file named Ch. 11 Data Set 2, test the resea.docx
Using the data in the file named Ch. 11 Data Set 2, test the resea.docxUsing the data in the file named Ch. 11 Data Set 2, test the resea.docx
Using the data in the file named Ch. 11 Data Set 2, test the resea.docxdaniahendric
 
Assignment 2 Tests of SignificanceThroughout this assignment yo.docx
Assignment 2 Tests of SignificanceThroughout this assignment yo.docxAssignment 2 Tests of SignificanceThroughout this assignment yo.docx
Assignment 2 Tests of SignificanceThroughout this assignment yo.docxrock73
 
statisticscf_choose_a_statistical_test (1) (1).pptxIndependen.docx
statisticscf_choose_a_statistical_test (1) (1).pptxIndependen.docxstatisticscf_choose_a_statistical_test (1) (1).pptxIndependen.docx
statisticscf_choose_a_statistical_test (1) (1).pptxIndependen.docxrafaelaj1
 
Experimental design
Experimental designExperimental design
Experimental designmetalkid132
 
Classroom research
Classroom researchClassroom research
Classroom researchCarlo Magno
 
The t Test for Related Sam.docx
The t Test for Related Sam.docxThe t Test for Related Sam.docx
The t Test for Related Sam.docxssusera34210
 
Repeated-Measures and Two-Factor Analysis of Variance
Repeated-Measures and Two-Factor Analysis of VarianceRepeated-Measures and Two-Factor Analysis of Variance
Repeated-Measures and Two-Factor Analysis of Variancejasondroesch
 
Answer the questions below, following the Submission Requirements .docx
Answer the questions below, following the Submission Requirements .docxAnswer the questions below, following the Submission Requirements .docx
Answer the questions below, following the Submission Requirements .docxjustine1simpson78276
 
WEEK 6 – EXERCISES Enter your answers in the spaces pr.docx
WEEK 6 – EXERCISES Enter your answers in the spaces pr.docxWEEK 6 – EXERCISES Enter your answers in the spaces pr.docx
WEEK 6 – EXERCISES Enter your answers in the spaces pr.docxwendolynhalbert
 

Similar to Chapter 10 2 way (20)

WEEK 5 – EXERCISES Enter your answers in the spaces pr.docx
WEEK 5 – EXERCISES Enter your answers in the spaces pr.docxWEEK 5 – EXERCISES Enter your answers in the spaces pr.docx
WEEK 5 – EXERCISES Enter your answers in the spaces pr.docx
 
lecture5.ppt
lecture5.pptlecture5.ppt
lecture5.ppt
 
Chapter 8 class version 2
Chapter 8 class version 2Chapter 8 class version 2
Chapter 8 class version 2
 
Criteria No Submission0 pointsEmerging (F through .docx
Criteria No Submission0 pointsEmerging (F through .docxCriteria No Submission0 pointsEmerging (F through .docx
Criteria No Submission0 pointsEmerging (F through .docx
 
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
 
Research Methods in PsychologyQuasi-Experimental Designs.docx
Research Methods in PsychologyQuasi-Experimental Designs.docxResearch Methods in PsychologyQuasi-Experimental Designs.docx
Research Methods in PsychologyQuasi-Experimental Designs.docx
 
Casteleyn playing with improv theatre to battle public speaking stress
Casteleyn playing with improv theatre to battle public speaking stressCasteleyn playing with improv theatre to battle public speaking stress
Casteleyn playing with improv theatre to battle public speaking stress
 
Conducting a 3-Way ANOVAWhy ANOVA can be used to handle mult.docx
Conducting a 3-Way ANOVAWhy  ANOVA can be used to handle mult.docxConducting a 3-Way ANOVAWhy  ANOVA can be used to handle mult.docx
Conducting a 3-Way ANOVAWhy ANOVA can be used to handle mult.docx
 
Using the data in the file named Ch. 11 Data Set 2, test the resea.docx
Using the data in the file named Ch. 11 Data Set 2, test the resea.docxUsing the data in the file named Ch. 11 Data Set 2, test the resea.docx
Using the data in the file named Ch. 11 Data Set 2, test the resea.docx
 
Assignment 2 Tests of SignificanceThroughout this assignment yo.docx
Assignment 2 Tests of SignificanceThroughout this assignment yo.docxAssignment 2 Tests of SignificanceThroughout this assignment yo.docx
Assignment 2 Tests of SignificanceThroughout this assignment yo.docx
 
bgfact_stat.ppt
bgfact_stat.pptbgfact_stat.ppt
bgfact_stat.ppt
 
statisticscf_choose_a_statistical_test (1) (1).pptxIndependen.docx
statisticscf_choose_a_statistical_test (1) (1).pptxIndependen.docxstatisticscf_choose_a_statistical_test (1) (1).pptxIndependen.docx
statisticscf_choose_a_statistical_test (1) (1).pptxIndependen.docx
 
Experimental design
Experimental designExperimental design
Experimental design
 
Classroom research
Classroom researchClassroom research
Classroom research
 
The t Test for Related Sam.docx
The t Test for Related Sam.docxThe t Test for Related Sam.docx
The t Test for Related Sam.docx
 
Repeated-Measures and Two-Factor Analysis of Variance
Repeated-Measures and Two-Factor Analysis of VarianceRepeated-Measures and Two-Factor Analysis of Variance
Repeated-Measures and Two-Factor Analysis of Variance
 
Answer the questions below, following the Submission Requirements .docx
Answer the questions below, following the Submission Requirements .docxAnswer the questions below, following the Submission Requirements .docx
Answer the questions below, following the Submission Requirements .docx
 
Bus 308
Bus 308Bus 308
Bus 308
 
WEEK 6 – EXERCISES Enter your answers in the spaces pr.docx
WEEK 6 – EXERCISES Enter your answers in the spaces pr.docxWEEK 6 – EXERCISES Enter your answers in the spaces pr.docx
WEEK 6 – EXERCISES Enter your answers in the spaces pr.docx
 
One_-ANOVA.ppt
One_-ANOVA.pptOne_-ANOVA.ppt
One_-ANOVA.ppt
 

Chapter 10 2 way

  • 2. Two-way ANOVA  Two-way ANOVA is one type of Factorial ANOVA.  Factorial ANOVAs are designs with two or more between-subjects independent variables  If there are within-subjects IVs, then they are often called Mixed ANOVAs
  • 3. Two-way ANOVA  Grouping factors (IVs)  Example  IV: experience with three levels - rookie, novice, and veteran  IV: pitcher type with two levels - starter and relief  DV: physical stamina  3 X 2 factorial design  Computes a separate F ratio for each independent variable (called main effects) and the interaction between the variables  F for experience  F for pitcher type  F for experience*pitch interaction
  • 4. Example: 3 X 2 Factorial Design Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Starter Relief Group 5 Group 6 rookie novice veteran Experience Level Pitcher Type
  • 5. Practice  A 3 X 3 design  How many independent variables? 1. 1 2. 2 3. 3 4. 4
  • 6. Practice  A 3 X 3 design  How many levels of the first independent variable listed? 1. 1 2. 2 3. 3 4. 4
  • 7. Practice  A 3 X 3 design  How many conditions? 1. 2 2. 3 3. 6 4. 9
  • 8. Practice  A researcher tests male and female doctors for manual dexterity . She tests dexterity for different tools: scalpel, scissors, scope, and probe.  How many independent variables? 1. 1 2. 2 3. 3 4. 4
  • 9. Practice  A researcher tests male and female doctors for manual dexterity . She tests dexterity for different tools: scalpel, scissors, scope, and probe.  How many levels of the second independent variable (tools)? 1. 1 2. 2 3. 3 4. 4
  • 10. Practice  A researcher tests male and female doctors for manual dexterity . She tests dexterity for different tools: scalpel, scissors, scope, and probe.  How many conditions? 1. 2 2. 4 3. 6 4. 8
  • 11. Practice  You are studying factors that are associated with problem- solving skills. You place subjects into groups according to the following: student involvement with extracurricular activities (involved vs. not involved), student university type (public vs. private), and student self-reported procrastination (high, medium, and low). You then test the students’ problem- solving ability with a test.  What is the design? 1. 1 X 2 X 2 X 3 2. 2 X 2 X 3 3. 3 X 2 X 6 4. 4 X 3
  • 12. Practice  You are studying factors that are associated with problem- solving skills. You place subjects into groups according to the following: student involvement with extracurricular activities (involved vs. not involved), student university type (public vs. private), and student self-reported procrastination (high, medium, and low). You then test the students’ problem- solving ability with a test.  How many independent variables? 1. 1 2. 2 3. 3 4. 4
  • 13. Practice  You are studying factors that are associated with problem- solving skills. You place subjects into groups according to the following: student involvement with extracurricular activities (involved vs. not involved), student university type (public vs. private), and student self-reported procrastination (high, medium, and low). You then test the students’ problem- solving ability with a test.  How many cells? 1. 3 2. 8 3. 12 4. 24
  • 14. Two-way ANOVA  Main Effects  Think of them as one-way ANOVAs for each independent variable.  If you have 2 IVs, then you have two possible main effects  Example  A main effect for experience would look at the three levels ignoring (collapsed across) pitcher type  A main effect for pitcher type looks at starters vs. relief pitchers regardless of (collapsed across) experience
  • 15. Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Starter Relief Group 5 Group 6 rookie novice veteran Experience Level Pitcher Type Marginal Mean For Rookie Marginal Mean For Novice Marginal Mean For Veteran Marginal Mean For Starter Marginal Mean For Relief
  • 16. Two-way ANOVA  Interaction  For a two-way ANOVA there is one possible interaction  Interactions occur if the effects of one IV are different under different levels of the other IV  Example  Something about being an expert makes you behave differently if you are a starter as opposed to being a relief pitcher.  As the number of factors increases, the number of possible interaction increases
  • 17. Practice  You are studying factors that are associated with problem- solving skills. You place subjects into groups according to the following: student involvement with extracurricular activities (involved vs. not involved), student university type (public vs. private), and student self-reported procrastination (high, medium, and low). You then test the students’ problem- solving ability with a test.  How many main effects are possible? 1. 1 2. 2 3. 3 4. 4
  • 18. Practice  You are studying factors that are associated with problem- solving skills. You place subjects into groups according to the following: student involvement with extracurricular activities (involved vs. not involved), student university type (public vs. private), and student self-reported procrastination (high, medium, and low). You then test the students’ problem- solving ability with a test.  How many interactions are possible? 1. 1 2. 2 3. 3 4. 4
  • 19. Two-way ANOVA  Identifying main effects and interactions  First test for significance (will discuss how that is done later)  Then use either table or graph to see the relationship that exists between variables  For instructional purposes we will assume the tests for significance have been done and that the main effects and interactions identified are significant  Remember if not significant than no exploration of that particular main effect or interaction.
  • 20. Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Starter Relief rookie veteranExperience Level Pitcher Type Marginal Mean For Rookie Marginal Mean For Veteran Marginal Mean For Starter Marginal Mean For Relief
  • 21. No Main Effects or Interaction 20 20 Starter Relief rookie veteran 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 rookie veteran starter relief
  • 22. Main Effect for Experience 10 10 Starter Relief rookie veteran 10 20 20 20 15 15 0 5 10 15 20 25 rookie veteran starter relief
  • 23. Main Effect for Pitcher Type 20 10 Starter Relief rookie veteran 15 20 10 15 20 10 0 5 10 15 20 25 rookie veteran starter relief
  • 24. Two Main Effects 20 15 Starter Relief rookie veteran 17.5 15 10 12.5 17.5 12.5 0 5 10 15 20 25 rookie veteran starter relief
  • 25. Interaction with No Main Effects 20 10 Starter Relief rookie veteran 15 10 20 15 15 15 0 5 10 15 20 25 rookie veteran starter relief
  • 26. Interaction and Main Effect for Experience 20 15 Starter Relief rookie veteran 17.5 10 15 12.5 15 15 0 5 10 15 20 25 rookie veteran starter relief
  • 27. Interaction and Main Effect for Pitcher Type 20 10 Starter Relief rookie veteran 15 15 15 15 17.5 12.5 0 5 10 15 20 25 rookie veteran starter relief
  • 28. Interaction and Two Main Effects 9 11 Starter Relief rookie veteran 10 28 12 20 16 14 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 rookie veteran starter relief
  • 29. Assumptions of Between Factor ANOVAs  DV data are interval or ratio level  Data are normally distributed  Variances are equivalent (homogeneity of variance)  Independence of observations  Same statistical ratio ANOVA = Treatment Variance Error Variance
  • 30. Stating Hypotheses  Two levels of hypotheses  Main effects  Hypothesis for each IV  Hypothesis for Main Effect A (also sometimes called Main Effect Row)  Ho: μ1 = μ2 …  Ha: not all of the μi are equal.  Hypothesis for Main Effect B (also sometimes called Main Effect Column)  Ho: μ1 = μ2 …  Ha: not all of the μi are equal.
  • 31. Stating Hypotheses  Hypothesis for Interaction (sometimes written A*B or Row*Column)  Hypothesis for each combination of IVs  Ho: There is no interaction between factors A and B. All differences are explained by main effects.  Ha: There is an interaction. The mean difference between treatments are not what would be predicted from main effects only
  • 32. Partitioning  One-Way Subjects  SSbetween  SSwithin  Two-Way Subjects  SSbetween (divided up)  SSrow  SScolumn  SSrow*column  SSwithin
  • 33. Computation N G X 2 2 )()()( 222222 N G n T N G n T N G n T column column row row SStotal formula df N - 1 SSrow SScolumn SSrow*column N G n T row row 22 SSwithin SStotal – SSrow – SScolumn – SS row*column a – 1 Where a is number of rows b – 1 Where b is number of columns (a – 1)(b – 1) (a)(b)(n-1) N G n T column column 22
  • 34. Example Starter Relief Rookie 4 3 3 5 1 0 2 1 Veteran 3 2 1 2 2 3 1 1 Calculate the means for each of these cells Rookie/Starter 3.75 Rookie/Relief 1 Veteran/Starter 2 Veteran/Relief 1.75
  • 35. What are the Total df? Source SS df MS F Main Effect for Row 9.00 Main Effect for Column 1.00 Interaction 6.25 Error (within groups) 9.50 Total 25.75
  • 36. What are the Total df? Source SS df MS F Main Effect for Row 9.00 Main Effect for Column 1.00 Interaction 6.25 Error (within groups) 9.50 Total 25.75 15
  • 37. What are the df row? Source SS df MS F Main Effect for Row 9.00 Main Effect for Column 1.00 Interaction 6.25 Error (within groups) 9.50 Total 25.75 15
  • 38. What are the df row? Source SS df MS F Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 Main Effect for Column 1.00 Interaction 6.25 Error (within groups) 9.50 Total 25.75 15
  • 39. What are the df column? Source SS df MS F Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 Main Effect for Column 1.00 Interaction 6.25 Error (within groups) 9.50 Total 25.75 15
  • 40. What are the df column? Source SS df MS F Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 Interaction 6.25 Error (within groups) 9.50 Total 25.75 15
  • 41. What are the df interaction? Source SS df MS F Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 Interaction 6.25 Error (within groups) 9.50 Total 25.75 15
  • 42. What are the df interaction? Source SS df MS F Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 Interaction 6.25 1 Error (within groups) 9.50 Total 25.75 15
  • 43. What are the df error? Source SS df MS F Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 Interaction 6.25 1 Error (within groups) 9.50 Total 25.75 15
  • 44. What are the df error? Source SS df MS F Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 Interaction 6.25 1 Error (within groups) 9.50 12 Total 25.75 15
  • 45. What is the MS for row? Source SS df MS F Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 Interaction 6.25 1 Error (within groups) 9.50 12 Total 25.75 15
  • 46. What is the MS for row? Source SS df MS F Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00 Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 Interaction 6.25 1 Error (within groups) 9.50 12 Total 25.75 15
  • 47. What is the MS for column? Source SS df MS F Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00 Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 Interaction 6.25 1 Error (within groups) 9.50 12 Total 25.75 15
  • 48. What is the MS for column? Source SS df MS F Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00 Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 1.00 Interaction 6.25 1 Error (within groups) 9.50 12 Total 25.75 15
  • 49. What is the MS interaction? Source SS df MS F Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00 Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 1.00 Interaction 6.25 1 Error (within groups) 9.50 12 Total 25.75 15
  • 50. What is the MS interaction? Source SS df MS F Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00 Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 1.00 Interaction 6.25 1 6.25 Error (within groups) 9.50 12 Total 25.75 15
  • 51. What is the MS error? Source SS df MS F Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00 Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 1.00 Interaction 6.25 1 6.25 Error (within groups) 9.50 12 Total 25.75 15
  • 52. What is the MS error? Source SS df MS F Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00 Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 1.00 Interaction 6.25 1 6.25 Error (within groups) 9.50 12 0.79 Total 25.75 15
  • 53. What is the main effect for row? Source SS df MS F Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00 Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 1.00 Interaction 6.25 1 6.25 Error (within groups) 9.50 12 0.79 Total 25.75 15
  • 54. What is the main effect for row? Source SS df MS F Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00 11.37 Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 1.00 Interaction 6.25 1 6.25 Error (within groups) 9.50 12 0.79 Total 25.75 15
  • 55. What is the main effect for column? Source SS df MS F Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00 11.37 Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 1.00 Interaction 6.25 1 6.25 Error (within groups) 9.50 12 0.79 Total 25.75 15
  • 56. What is the main effect for column? Source SS df MS F Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00 11.37 Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 1.00 1.26 Interaction 6.25 1 6.25 Error (within groups) 9.50 12 0.79 Total 25.75 15
  • 57. What is the interaction? Source SS df MS F Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00 11.37 Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 1.00 1.26 Interaction 6.25 1 6.25 Error (within groups) 9.50 12 0.79 Total 25.75 15
  • 58. What is the interaction? Source SS df MS F Main Effect for Row 9.00 1 9.00 11.37 Main Effect for Column 1.00 1 1.00 1.26 Interaction 6.25 1 6.25 7.90 Error (within groups) 9.50 12 0.79 Total 25.75 15
  • 59. Example  Critical Value  For each test use the df associated with it.  Is not necessarily the same for all three tests although in our example it is.  4.747  Evaluate each effect separately
  • 60.  Is Main Effect row sig?  Yes  No
  • 61.  Is Main Effect column sig?  Yes  No
  • 62.  Is Interaction sig?  Yes  No
  • 63. Now what?  If you have no significant interaction, then you can talk about what main effects are significant in the same way that you evaluated one-way ANOVAs.  If the interaction is significant you must be careful interpreting main effects. The main effect could be present simply because of the interaction. So concentrate on the interaction interpretation.
  • 64. Now what?  If it is a 2X2 ANOVA and the interaction is significant then graph the means and interpret.  Our example 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 starter relief rookie veteran
  • 65. Now what?  If interaction is significant  Plot interaction  Interpret interaction  Level of one IV is influenced by level of a second IV  If Main Effects are significant  Conduct Post Hoc tests  Report results  Effect sizes • Use omega squared to report effect size