Download as KEY, PPTX
Uploaded byCristina Costa
Prism 2011
The document discusses how digital tools can help researchers collaborate and disseminate their work, highlighting technologies like Google Docs, Evernote, Dropbox, and Twitter that allow for synchronous and asynchronous collaboration, organization of references and notes, sharing of files and resources, and engagement with broader audiences. It argues that digital scholarship enables new forms of collaboration, communication, and identity building for researchers in the 21st century digital world.
More Related Content
Prism 2011
- 1. Raising your profilein a digital world PRISM 2011: Postgraduate Researchers In Science Medicine conference 04 July 2011
- 2.
- 3. going back intime before we went digital
- 4. using the technology of their times
- 5. o rker s! Ne tw Erasmus Voltaire Darwin (1466 – 1536) (1694 – 1778) (1809 – 1882)
- 6.
- 7.
- 9. Digital Scholarship why? your thoughts...
- 10.
- 11. http://www.flickr.com/photos/susanvg/3382838948/sizes/l/ collaboration
- 12. tools: co-writing google docs zoho.com •papers & reports •project proposals •surveys •presentations •etc
- 13. ‘synchronous’ co-writing googledocs (or typewith.me) & skype (or google talk)
- 14. live discussion web telephony skype as a(n) (a)synchronous group channel ... a great tool for research interviews
- 15. collecting tool: diigo.com resources sharing bookmarks annotating web pages highlighting texts etc
- 16. taking notes tool: evernote.com digital note taking snapshots of websites tagging content research notes etc
- 17. collective tools: ning.com scivee.tv intelligence buddypress.org social network sites collaborating with a wider audience Sharing ideas & perspecives
- 18. joint projects tools: pbworks.com wikispaces.com wetpaint.com wikis: engaging in a collaborative process; co-developing a web resource...
- 19. tool: sharing files dropbox.com
- 20. organising tools: mendeley.com references zotero.org citeulike.org collect organise & cite your bibliographical references
- 22.
- 23. presentation sharing podcasting twitter blogging
- 24. http://tinyurl.com/5c5eck public engagement
- 25.
- 26. Academics to 'embraceWikipedia' http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-12809944
- 27. Don’t only pushor pull Communicate It’s about dialog!
- 28. http://www.flickr.com/photos/56695083@N00/4464828517/sizes/l/ Identity & Reputation
- 29.
- 30.
- 31. but not necessarilyon your own!
- 32. blog = thehub http://www.lisaharrismarketing.com personal, shared reflection of... practice, thoughts in progress, ideas, events.... aggregates distributed presence...
- 34. a story from twitterand beyond about Open Thinking
- 35. crowd-sourcing information open tenure
- 36. happy ending http://educationaltechnology.ca/cv/
- 37.
- 38.
- 39. Cultivating a network where to start?
- 41. If we wereto start designing a strategy for communication and dissemination of research from scratch, based on what is available today, without any constraints of internal structures or external regulating bodies, what would it look like? Cameron Neylon, RIN Event (London, November 2010) See discussion here: http://knowmansland.com/learningpath/?p=772
- 42. getting started... www.flickr.com/photos/turtlemom_nancy/1914397629/sizes/o/ • analyse your needs • start with what suits your purpose better • check where ‘your community’ is • the true power of social media is in the network (people) stuck? http://webpossibilities.pbworks.com
Editor's Notes
- #2 \n
- #3 \n
- #4 \n
- #5 \n
- #6 \nVoltaire as an example of the statement above. The Philosopher was probably one of the most networked scholars of his time, with more than a thousand European correspondents\nNetworks of correspondence was quite useful during the Classic Age as a form of establishing and maintaining connections with the outside world in a rather informal, yet meaningful way. Other thinkers of that time also made use of the Epistolary genre to establish their networks beyond their local whereabouts: Erasmus and more recently Darwin \nCheck Republic of Letters: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nw0oS-AOIPE \nCharles Darwin corresponded with over 2000 individuals worldwide, exchanging his views on scientific matters, his health and family life... in http://great-scientists.suite101.com/article.cfm/charles_darwins_letters \n\nRead more at Suite101: Charles Darwin's Letters: Darwin Correspondence Project Expands his World Wide Web http://great-scientists.suite101.com/article.cfm/charles_darwins_letters#ixzz0p5hMEPG6\n\nDarwin corresponded widely, asking for information and opinions, checking facts. He was very scrupulous in giving credit, just look at the footnotes in his books. But actually the flow was not one-way. Yes, Darwin was a phenomenal networker. He would probably have had a blog. in http://agro.biodiver.se/2009/02/blogging-the-big-birthday-darwin-the-seed-networker/ \n
- #7 \n
- #8 \n
- #9 \n
- #10 \n
- #11 \n
- #12 \n
- #13 \n
- #14 \n
- #15 \n
- #16 \n
- #17 \n
- #18 \n
- #19 \n
- #20 \n
- #21 \n
- #22 \n
- #23 \n
- #24 \n
- #25 \n
- #26 \n
- #27 \n
- #28 \n
- #29 \n
- #30 \n
- #31 \n
- #32 \n
- #33 \n
- #34 \n
- #35 \n
- #36 \n
- #37 \n
- #38 \n
- #39 \n
- #40 \n
- #41 \n
- #42 \n
- #43 \n
- #44 \n