The document discusses the use of various social media technologies in education such as Twitter, Facebook, blogs, and bookmarking tools and how they can be used to facilitate communication, sharing of resources, and building online communities while also addressing potential issues around privacy, expectations of responses, and the transitory nature of some platforms. It provides examples of how tools like Twitter can be used to engage students inside and outside the classroom and encourages educators to think about how to integrate social media into their teaching in a way that enhances learning.
El martes 3 de mayo tuve la oportunidad de asistir a la Conferencia que brindó Stephen Downes en la fundación OSDE en Rosario, Santa Fe.
He aquí su ppt
Technologies such as Diigo make it possible to amass a personal library of any size. Having access to the information you need amplifies your memory giving you an outboard brain. The social aspects of Diigo makes it possible to share content amongst like-minded collectors of information.
This is our Web 2.0 document for class.
We investigated Animoto, VoiceThread, and Slideshare.
We hope you enjoy them.
We look forward to viewing everyones.
Thanks.
Larissa Klein, Andrew Toth, and Kathleen Bishop
Getting started with global collaborationJulie Lindsay
Presentation / workshop given at the Asia Society Partnership for Global Learning conference, NYC, June 2012.
See resources: http://globalcollaboration.flatclassroomproject.org/2012+Partnership+for+Global+Learning
WOW Presentation-K12 Online ConferencePeggy George
Presentation for WOW AzTEA Conference by Peggy George and Ann Lumm. Slideshow created originally by April Chamberlain, Darren Kuropatwa, Shawn Nutting, Sheryl Nussbuam-Beach, and Wesley Fryer--"Lessons Learned from K-12 Online 2006" and modified slightly for our hands-on workshop. April 28, 2007.
Een verhaal over hoe werk en leren steeds meer op elkaar beginnen te lijken in deze kennismaatschappij en wat betekent voor de rol van een elektronische leeromgeving.
One Session Wonder presentation to kick off a discussion of Digital Humanities in courses. [version 1, it needs revision, and more examples/ interactivity]
El martes 3 de mayo tuve la oportunidad de asistir a la Conferencia que brindó Stephen Downes en la fundación OSDE en Rosario, Santa Fe.
He aquí su ppt
Technologies such as Diigo make it possible to amass a personal library of any size. Having access to the information you need amplifies your memory giving you an outboard brain. The social aspects of Diigo makes it possible to share content amongst like-minded collectors of information.
This is our Web 2.0 document for class.
We investigated Animoto, VoiceThread, and Slideshare.
We hope you enjoy them.
We look forward to viewing everyones.
Thanks.
Larissa Klein, Andrew Toth, and Kathleen Bishop
Getting started with global collaborationJulie Lindsay
Presentation / workshop given at the Asia Society Partnership for Global Learning conference, NYC, June 2012.
See resources: http://globalcollaboration.flatclassroomproject.org/2012+Partnership+for+Global+Learning
WOW Presentation-K12 Online ConferencePeggy George
Presentation for WOW AzTEA Conference by Peggy George and Ann Lumm. Slideshow created originally by April Chamberlain, Darren Kuropatwa, Shawn Nutting, Sheryl Nussbuam-Beach, and Wesley Fryer--"Lessons Learned from K-12 Online 2006" and modified slightly for our hands-on workshop. April 28, 2007.
Een verhaal over hoe werk en leren steeds meer op elkaar beginnen te lijken in deze kennismaatschappij en wat betekent voor de rol van een elektronische leeromgeving.
One Session Wonder presentation to kick off a discussion of Digital Humanities in courses. [version 1, it needs revision, and more examples/ interactivity]
Presentation given at Seattle Pacific University during 2011 Global Symposium : Educational Innovations and Reform in Countries around the World.
Presenting some of the way openness (in particular open education) can act as an institutional catalyst for innovation and reform
Developing patterns in technical approaches for Open Educational Resources. R. John Robertson and Lorna Campbell, & Phil Barker
JISC CETIS. Presentation at OER 11, Manchester, May 11th 2011
Reference copy of some thoughts about engaging students in online learning, slides for a professional development workshop. first time talking about this so there's lots in these that I would now adapt/ develop further
Reflecting evidence and integration: highlighting a spectrum of ePortfolio us...R. John Robertson
"Reflecting evidence and integration: highlighting a spectrum of ePortfolio use at UW" R. John Robertson, ePortfolio and Online Learning Support, UW-Oshkosh and Saundra Solum, Instructional Technology Coordinator, UW-La Crosse. LTDC West
April 25th 2013
The power of adaptive learning media in the classroom. Learning is social. Bring the real world into the classroom and apply the learning to our real world life experiences. Make the learning real.
Is Open Education between the Cathedral and the Bazaar?: m?: the promise and pitfalls of borrowing models and metaphors for the OER community. R. John Robertson and Lorna Campbell , Phil Barker, and Li Yuan JISC CETIS
Presentation at OER 11, Manchester, May 11th 2011
Librarians and Open Educational Resources: a match made in...R. John Robertson
Learn to Share to Learn,A joint conference from the South Western Regional Library Service and the JISC Regional Support Centre South West.Taunton Rugby Club March 23rd 2011
Finding and using OERs - an introduction. Learn to Share to Learn,A joint conference from the South Western Regional Library Service and the JISC Regional Support Centre South West.Taunton Rugby Club March 23rd 2011
The paper trail:steps towards a reference model for the metadata ecologyR. John Robertson
The paper trail: steps towards a reference model for the metadata ecology, presentation at ~CoLIS5 workshop. Presentation with Jane Barton. http://mwi.cdlr.strath.ac.uk/Colisworkshop.htm
Archiving- from June 2005.
please note this presentation is currently all rights reserved until i contact the other author.
semi final version of presentation for opened2010; currently lacking decent alt text for graphs and clear licensing in the ppt - posted as backup; will update version after the event
One Standard to rule them all?: Descriptive Choices for Open EducationR. John Robertson
R. John Robertson1, Lorna Campbell1, Phil Barker2, Li Yuan3, and Sheila MacNeill1
1Centre for Academic Practice and Learning Enhancement, University of Strathclyde, 2Institute for Computer Based Learning, Heriot-Watt University 3Institute for Cybernetic Education, University of Bolton
Drawing on our experience of supporting a nationwide Open Educational Resources programme (the UKOER programme), this presentation will consider the diverse range of approaches to describing OERs that have emerged across the programme and their impact on resource sharing, workflows, and an aggregate view of the resources.
Due to the diverse nature of the projects in the programme, ranging from individual educators to discipline-based consortia and institutions, it was apparent that no one technical or descriptive solution would fit all. Consequently projects were mandated to supply only a limited amount of descriptive information (programme tag, author, title, date, url, file format, file size, rights) with some additional information suggested (language, subject classifications, keywords, tags, comments, description). Projects were free to choose how this information should be encoded (if at all), stored, and shared.
In response, the projects have taken many different approaches to the description and management of resources. These range from using traditional highly structured and detailed metadata standards to approaches using whatever descriptions are supported by particular web2.0 applications. This experimental approach to resource description offers the wider OER community an opportunity to examine and assess the implications of different strategies for resource description and management
This paper illustrates a number of examples of projects’ approaches to description, noting the workflows and effort involved. We will consider the relationship of the choice of tool (repository, web2.0 application, VLE) to the choice of standards; and the relationship between local requirements and those of the wider community.
We will consider the impact of those choices on the dissemination and discoverability of resources. For example, the implications of resource description choices for discovery services which draw on multiple sources of OERs.
Approaches to supporting Open Educational Resource projectsR. John Robertson
R. John Robertson1, Sheila MacNeill1, Phil Barker2, Lorna Campbell1 and Li Yuan3
1Centre for Academic Practice and Learning Enhancement, University of Strathclyde, 2Institute for Computer Based Learning, Heriot-Watt University, 3Institute for Cybernetic Education, University of Bolton
This paper examines CETIS experience of supporting a nationwide programme to release Open Educational Resources (the JISC Higher Education Academy UKOER Pilot Programme ). We consider how our model of support could inform others and be adapted to encourage sustainable technical support networks for Open Course Ware initiatives. As a national initiative involving universities throughout the UK, the UKOER programme involved a diverse range of OER providers, including individual educators, discipline-based consortia and institutions. Given this diversity it was recognised from the outset that no single technical solution would fit all projects, and therefore no specific tools, descriptive standards, exchange or dissemination mechanisms were mandated (apart from a requirement that the resources produced be represented in a national repository of learning materials ). In supporting this programme we have had to address diverse approaches and communities and it is likely that any similar pan-institutional initiative for supporting the release of OERs would face similar challenges.
Our approach to programme support has sought to move from the detail of specific support issues towards underlying support principles; thereby anticipating other issues and promoting good practice.
Our method has been: to provoke conversation through technical presentations and discussion opportunities at meetings or through blog posts; to investigate the technical choices made by individual projects through technical review conversations and record summary details of these conversations publicly online through an interface supporting searching and browsing; and to respond to issues arising from these calls or from project blogs.
In considering how this approach could be used more widely we will look at the challenges of working openly, the organisational overhead of this approach, its adaptability, and the role we think it has played in supporting the management and dissemination of OERs for this programme.
What do academic libraries have to do with open educational resourcesR. John Robertson
This paper (preprint for Open Ed 2010) will discuss the possible roles of academic libraries in promoting, supporting, and sustaining institutional Open Educational Resource initiatives. It will note areas in which libraries or librarians have skills and knowledge that intersect with some of the needs of academic staff and students as they use and release OERs. It will also present the results of a brief survey of the views of some OER initiatives on the current and potential role of academic libraries.
Approaches to supporting Open Educational Resource projectsR. John Robertson
Approaches to supporting Open Educational Resource projects, OCWC2010 Hanoi, May 5-7 2010.
R. John Robertson1, Sheila MacNeill1, Phil Barker2, Lorna Campbell1 and Li Yuan3
1Centre for Academic Practice and Learning Enhancement, University of Strathclyde, 2Institute for Computer Based Learning, Heriot-Watt University, 3Institute for Cybernetic Education, University of Bolton
One Standard to rule them all?: Descriptive Choices for Open EducationR. John Robertson
One Standard to rule them all?: Descriptive Choices for Open Education, OCWC2010 Hanoi, May 5-7 2010
R. John Robertson1, Lorna Campbell1, Phil Barker2, Li Yuan3, and Sheila MacNeill1 1Centre for Academic Practice and Learning Enhancement, University of Strathclyde, 2Institute for Computer Based Learning, Heriot-Watt University 3Institute for Cybernetic Education, University of Bolton
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
This is a presentation by Dada Robert in a Your Skill Boost masterclass organised by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan (EFSS) on Saturday, the 25th and Sunday, the 26th of May 2024.
He discussed the concept of quality improvement, emphasizing its applicability to various aspects of life, including personal, project, and program improvements. He defined quality as doing the right thing at the right time in the right way to achieve the best possible results and discussed the concept of the "gap" between what we know and what we do, and how this gap represents the areas we need to improve. He explained the scientific approach to quality improvement, which involves systematic performance analysis, testing and learning, and implementing change ideas. He also highlighted the importance of client focus and a team approach to quality improvement.
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS ModuleCeline George
Bills have a main role in point of sale procedure. It will help to track sales, handling payments and giving receipts to customers. Bill splitting also has an important role in POS. For example, If some friends come together for dinner and if they want to divide the bill then it is possible by POS bill splitting. This slide will show how to split bills in odoo 17 POS.
The Indian economy is classified into different sectors to simplify the analysis and understanding of economic activities. For Class 10, it's essential to grasp the sectors of the Indian economy, understand their characteristics, and recognize their importance. This guide will provide detailed notes on the Sectors of the Indian Economy Class 10, using specific long-tail keywords to enhance comprehension.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
3. Technologies
Communication and status tools
● Twitter /Facebook
Bookmarking tools
● Delcious/ Diigo / Scoop.it / Pinterest / etc.
Blogs
● (sort of, but also another discussion about
what is publishing; digital scholarship etc.)
4. Technologies
Affordances of social media
- not controlled (vulnerability?)
- often instant (expectations of a response?)
- brief (what sort of communication)
- more or less open/ public (boundaries?)
- distant community made local (which
community?)
5. Twitter - my tool of choice
public
#
concise
bookmarkish
distributed organisation
distributed community of practice
network of tools and services
network is easy and easy to flex
6. Changes Ahead
But pick a tool and remember that it's not yours
think about data export
hold the community tightly and platform lightly ;
replicate contacts across tools
be aware that the community and technology IS
transitory (e.g. tweetdeck)
7. Public access
What you do online, especially with social
media is *public*
Yes, there are various privacy protection
mechanisms but once you write and share it it's
outside of your control.
Think about privacy and creating space for
others
8. Automaton or person?
What do you tweet?
Do you create, share, or discuss?
Does @yournamehere produce a response?
9. Personhood & online identity
"It is only when we bring the personal (not the private) to
our discourse that we understand the rich complexity of
individual being out of which civilization is built–or out of
which it ought to be built.
[...] Sharing the personal, as distinguished from oversharing
the private, means engaging with personhood in all its
messy and glorious complexity, and all its potential, too. If,
as Jon Udell reminds us, “context is a service we provide
for each other,” the context is not merely informational, nor
is it about matters that should remain private."
Gardner Campbell
http://www.gardnercampbell.net/blog1/?p=2039
10. Professional Development
Helping the academic debate, conference chat,
journal paper, and water cooler integrate into
an online world.
How do you interact with your peers?
What parts of that might replicate to an online
environment?
What won't?
12. In and around the classroom
Thinking about your classroom
Is tech an opportunity or a distraction?
Does it support or conflict with your pedagogy
and objectives for a given activity?
Are there private options or safe spaces?
Are you ensuring that you're Ferpa compliant?
13. Twitter reference
- the embedded librarian (@efilgo)
Dialoguing with the Instructor
● A class tag #
● Encouraging students to tweet the class and
their questions
● Linking to relevant library and online
resources
● Promoting discussion, articulating and
sharing ideas, developing insight
● Folding resources into the class and
coursework, and the course into a wider
world
14. Open classrooms
If a student is online in your class are they
distracted, processing, or engaging?
What happens when you extend the
classroom? and include other voices?
What happens when the venue for discussion
is outwith your control?
15. Can you dig it?
http://ds106.us
A digital
storytelling
course ... on
campus for
credit but open
to the world
17. Is that it?
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?
key=0AtuuXRnPa9VJdG9mYXJWZFJlb29BWU
lZQTF4V1ZzNGc&usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?
key=0AtuuXRnPa9VJdGpBN0NNRWNicUtTdX
NQajVRelJwaVE&usp=sharing
18. Making things tangible again...
Capturing the
transitory with Storify
Reclaiming the data
with Momento (etc.)
and twitter archives
> making the digital
physical again.
19. Further reading
Gardner Campbell (2013) "Personal, Not Private" http://www.gardnercampbell.net/blog1/?p=2039
Martin Weller (2011) The Digital Scholar: How Technology Is Changing Academic Practice (OA
version: http://www.bloomsburyacademic.com/view/DigitalScholar_9781849666275/book-ba-
9781849666275.xml )
Ellen Hampton Filgo (2011) “#Hashtag Librarian: Embedding Myself Into a Class via Twitter and
Blogs”, Computers in Libraries, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 78-80.
Martin Hawksey (ongoing) http://mashe.hawksey.info
Tanya Joosten (2012) Social Media for Educators: Strategies and Best Practice
Nicola Osborne (2011) "Using social media in education, Part 1: Opportunity, risk, and policy"
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/industry/library/ind-educ-social-media1/index.html
______ (2012) "Using social media in education, Part 2: Tools, support, and technical issues"
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/industry/library/ind-educ-social-media2/index.html