SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Repeated Measures (ANOVA) 
Conceptual Explanation
How did you get here?
How did you get here? 
So, you have decided to use a Repeated 
Measures ANOVA.
How did you get here? 
So, you have decided to use a Repeated 
Measures ANOVA. 
Let’s consider the decisions you made to get 
here.
First of all, you must have noticed the problem 
to be solved deals with generalizing from a 
smaller sample to a larger population.
First of all, you must have noticed the problem 
to be solved deals with generalizing from a 
smaller sample to a larger population.
First of all, you must have noticed the problem 
to be solved deals with generalizing from a 
smaller sample to a larger population. 
Sample of 30
First of all, you must have noticed the problem 
to be solved deals with generalizing from a 
smaller sample to a larger population. 
Sample of 30
First of all, you must have noticed the problem 
to be solved deals with generalizing from a 
smaller sample to a larger population. 
Large Population of 30,000 
Sample of 30
First of all, you must have noticed the problem 
to be solved deals with generalizing from a 
smaller sample to a larger population. 
Large Population of 30,000 
Sample of 30 
Therefore, you would determine that the 
problem deals with inferential not descriptive 
statistics.
Therefore, you would determine that the 
problem deals with inferential not descriptive 
statistics.
Therefore, you would determine that the 
problem deals with inferential not descriptive 
statistics. 
Double check your 
problem to see if 
that is the case
Therefore, you would determine that the 
problem deals with inferential not descriptive 
statistics. 
Inferential Descriptive 
Double check your 
problem to see if 
that is the case
You would have also noticed that the problem 
dealt with questions of difference not 
Relationships, Independence nor Goodness of 
Fit. Inferential Descriptive
You would have also noticed that the problem 
dealt with questions of difference not 
Relationships, Independence nor Goodness of 
Fit. 
Double check your 
problem to see if 
that is the case 
Inferential Descriptive 
Difference
You would have also noticed that the problem 
dealt with questions of difference not 
Relationships, Independence nor Goodness of 
Fit. 
Double check your 
problem to see if 
that is the case 
Inferential Descriptive 
Difference Relationship
You would have also noticed that the problem 
dealt with questions of difference not 
Relationships, Independence nor Goodness of 
Fit. 
Double check your 
problem to see if 
that is the case 
Inferential Descriptive 
Difference Relationship Difference
You would have also noticed that the problem 
dealt with questions of difference not 
Relationships, Independence nor Goodness of 
Fit. 
Double check your 
problem to see if 
that is the case 
Inferential Descriptive 
Difference Relationship Difference Goodness of Fit
After checking the data, you noticed that the 
data was ratio/interval rather than extreme 
ordinal (1st, 2nd, 3rd place) or nominal (male, 
female) 
Double check your 
problem to see if 
that is the case 
Inferential Descriptive 
Difference Relationship Difference Goodness of Fit
After checking the data, you noticed that the 
data was ratio/interval rather than extreme 
ordinal (1st, 2nd, 3rd place) or nominal (male, 
female) 
Double check your 
problem to see if 
that is the case 
Inferential Descriptive 
Difference Goodness of Fit 
Difference Relationship 
Ratio/Interval
After checking the data, you noticed that the 
data was ratio/interval rather than extreme 
ordinal (1st, 2nd, 3rd place) or nominal (male, 
female) 
Double check your 
problem to see if 
that is the case 
Inferential Descriptive 
Difference Goodness of Fit 
Difference Relationship 
Ratio/Interval Ordinal
After checking the data, you noticed that the 
data was ratio/interval rather than extreme 
ordinal (1st, 2nd, 3rd place) or nominal (male, 
female) 
Double check your 
problem to see if 
that is the case 
Inferential Descriptive 
Difference Goodness of Fit 
Difference Relationship 
Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal
The distribution was more or less normal rather 
than skewed or kurtotic.
The distribution was more or less normal rather 
than skewed or kurtotic.
The distribution was more or less normal rather 
than skewed or kurtotic.
The distribution was more or less normal rather 
than skewed or kurtotic.
The distribution was more or less normal rather 
than skewed or kurtotic. 
Double check your 
problem to see if 
that is the case 
Inferential Descriptive 
Difference Goodness of Fit 
Skewed 
Difference Relationship 
Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal
The distribution was more or less normal rather 
than skewed or kurtotic. 
Double check your 
problem to see if 
that is the case 
Inferential Descriptive 
Difference Goodness of Fit 
Difference Relationship 
Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal 
Skewed Kurtotic
The distribution was more or less normal rather 
than skewed or kurtotic. 
Double check your 
problem to see if 
that is the case 
Inferential Descriptive 
Difference Goodness of Fit 
Difference Relationship 
Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal 
Skewed Kurtotic Normal
Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than 
two or more exist.
Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than 
two or more exist. 
DV #1 
Chemistry 
Test Scores
Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than 
two or more exist. 
DV #1 DV #2 
Chemistry 
Test Scores 
Class 
Attendance
Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than 
two or more exist. 
DV #1 DV #2 DV #3 
Chemistry 
Test Scores 
Class 
Attendance 
Homework 
Completed
Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than 
two or more exist. 
Inferential Descriptive 
Difference Goodness of Fit 
Double check your 
problem to see if 
that is the case 
Difference Relationship 
Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal 
Skewed Kurtotic Normal
Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than 
two or more exist. 
Descriptive 
Difference Goodness of Fit 
Difference Relationship 
Skewed Kurtotic Normal 
1 DV 
Double check your 
problem to see if 
that is the case 
Inferential 
Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal
Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than 
two or more exist. 
Inferential Descriptive 
Difference Relationship Difference Goodness of Fit 
Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal 
Skewed Kurtotic Normal 
1 DV 2+ DV 
Double check your 
problem to see if 
that is the case
Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than 
two or more exist.
Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than 
two or more exist. 
IV #1 
Use of Innovative 
eBook
Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than 
two or more exist. 
IV #1 IV #2 
Use of Innovative 
eBook 
Doing Homework 
to Classical Music
Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than 
two or more exist. 
IV #1 IV #2 IV #3 
Use of Innovative 
eBook 
Doing Homework 
to Classical Music 
Gender
Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than 
two or more exist. 
IV #1 IV #2 IV #3 
Use of Innovative 
eBook 
Doing Homework 
to Classical Music 
Gender
Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than 
two or more exist.
Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than 
two or more exist. Descriptive 
Difference Goodness of Fit 
Inferential 
Difference Relationship 
Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal 
Skewed Kurtotic Normal 
1 DV 2+ DV
Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than 
two or more exist. Inferential Descriptive 
Difference Goodness of Fit 
Difference Relationship 
Skewed Kurtotic Normal 
1 DV 2+ DV 
1 IV 
Inferential 
Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal
Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than 
two or more exist. Descriptive 
Difference Relationship Difference 
Difference Goodness of Fit 
Nominal 
Skewed Kurtotic Normal 
1 DV 2+ DV 
1 IV 2+ IV 
Inferential 
Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal
Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than 
two or more exist. Descriptive 
Difference Relationship Difference 
Difference Goodness of Fit 
Skewed Kurtotic Normal 
1 DV 2+ DV 
1 IV 2+ IV 
Double check your 
problem to see if 
that is the case 
Inferential 
Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal
There are three levels of the Independent 
Variable (IV) rather than just two levels. Note – 
even though repeated measures ANOVA can 
analyze just two levels, this is generally analyzed 
using a paired sample t-test.
There are three levels of the Independent 
Variable (DV) rather than just two levels. Note – 
even though repeated measures ANOVA can 
analyze just two levels, this is generally analyzed 
using a paired sample t-test. 
Level 1 
Before using the 
innovative ebook
There are three levels of the Independent 
Variable (DV) rather than just two levels. Note – 
even though repeated measures ANOVA can 
analyze just two levels, this is generally analyzed 
using a paired sample t-test. 
Level 1 Level 2 
Before using the 
innovative ebook 
Using the 
innovative ebook 
for 2 months
There are three levels of the Independent 
Variable (DV) rather than just two levels. Note – 
even though repeated measures ANOVA can 
analyze just two levels, this is generally analyzed 
using a paired sample t-test. 
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
Before using the 
innovative ebook 
Using the 
innovative ebook 
for 2 months 
Using the 
innovative ebook 
for 4 months
Descriptive 
Goodness of Fit 
Difference Relationship 
Skewed Kurtotic Normal 
1 DV 2+ DVs 
2+ IVs 
Inferential 
Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal 
1 IV 
2 levels 3+ levels 
Difference
The samples are repeated rather than 
independent. Notice that the same class (Chem 
100 section 003) is repeatedly tested.
The samples are repeated rather than 
independent. Notice that the same class (Chem 
100 section 003) is repeatedly tested. 
Chem 100 
Section 003 
January 
Chem 100 
Section 003 
March 
Chem 100 
Section 003 
May 
Before using 
the innovative 
ebook 
Using the 
innovative ebook 
for 2 months 
Using the 
innovative ebook 
for 4 months
Descriptive 
Goodness of Fit 
Difference Relationship 
Skewed Kurtotic Normal 
1 DV 2+ DVs 
2+ IVs 
Inferential 
Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal 
1 IV 
2 levels 3+ levels 
Difference 
Independent Repeated
If this was the appropriate path for your 
problem then you have correctly selected 
Repeated-measures ANOVA to solve the 
problem you have been presented.
Repeated Measures ANOVA –
Repeated Measures ANOVA – 
Another use of analysis of variance is to test 
whether a single group of people change over 
time.
Repeated Measures ANOVA – 
Another use of analysis of variance is to test 
whether a single group of people change over 
time.
In this case, the distributions that are compared 
to each other are not from different groups
In this case, the distributions that are compared 
to each other are not from different groups 
versus 
Group 1 Group 2
In this case, the distributions that are compared 
to each other are not from different groups 
versus 
Group 1 Group 2
In this case, the distributions that are compared 
to each other are not from different groups 
versus 
Group 1 Group 2 
But from different times.
In this case, the distributions that are compared 
to each other are not from different groups 
versus 
Group 1 Group 2 
But from different times. 
Group 1 Group 1: 
Two Months Later 
versus
For example, an instructor might administer the 
same test three times throughout the semester 
to ascertain whether students are improving in 
their skills.
For example, an instructor might administer the 
same test three times throughout the semester 
to ascertain whether students are improving in 
their skills. 
January February 
April 
Exam 1 
Exam 2 
Exam 3
For example, an instructor might administer the 
same test three times throughout the semester 
to ascertain whether students are improving in 
their skills. 
Exam 1 
Exam 2 
January February 
Exam 3 
April 
The overall F-ratio will reveal whether there are 
differences somewhere among three time 
periods.
For example, an instructor might administer the 
same test three times throughout the semester 
to ascertain whether students are improving in 
their skills. 
Exam 1 
Exam 2 
January February 
Exam 3 
April 
The overall F-ratio will reveal whether there are 
differences somewhere among three time 
periods.
For example, an instructor might administer the 
same test three times throughout the semester 
to ascertain whether students are improving in 
their skills. 
Exam 1 
Exam 2 
Average 
Score 
January February 
Exam 3 
April 
Average 
Score 
Average 
Score 
The overall F-ratio will reveal whether there are 
differences somewhere among three time 
periods.
For example, an instructor might administer the 
same test three times throughout the semester 
to ascertain whether students are improving in 
their skills. 
Exam 1 
Exam 2 
Average 
Score 
January February 
Exam 3 
April 
Average 
Score 
Average 
Score 
The overall F-ratio will reveal whether there are 
differences somewhere among three time 
periods.
For example, an instructor might administer the 
same test three times throughout the semester 
to ascertain whether students are improving in 
their skills. 
Exam 1 
Exam 2 
Average 
Score 
January February 
Exam 3 
April 
Average 
Score 
Average 
Score 
There is a 
difference but 
we don’t 
know where 
The overall F-ratio will reveal whether there are 
differences somewhere among three time 
periods.
Post hoc tests will reveal exactly where the 
differences occurred.
Post hoc tests will reveal exactly where the 
differences occurred. 
January February 
April 
Exam 1 
Exam 2 
Exam 3 
Average 
Score 35 
Average 
Score 38 
Average 
Score 40
Post hoc tests will reveal exactly where the 
differences occurred. 
January February 
April 
Exam 1 
Exam 2 
Exam 3 
Average 
Score 35 
Average 
Score 38 
Average 
Score 40 
There is a 
statistically 
significant 
difference only 
between Exam 1 
and Exam 3
In contrast, with the One-way analysis of 
Variance (ANOVA) we were attempting to 
determine if there was a statistical difference 
between 2 or more (generally 3 or more) 
groups.
In contrast, with the One-way analysis of 
Variance (ANOVA) we were attempting to 
determine if there was a statistical difference 
between 2 or more (generally 3 or more) 
groups. 
In our One-way ANOVA example in another 
presentation we attempted to determine if 
there was any statistically significant difference 
in the amount of Pizza Slices consumed by three 
different player types (football, basketball, and 
soccer).
The data would be set up thus:
The data would be set up thus: 
Football 
Players 
Pizza 
Slices 
Consumed 
Basketball 
Players 
Pizza Slices 
Consumed 
Soccer 
Players 
Pizza Slices 
Consumed 
Ben 5 Cam 6 Dan 5 
Bob 7 Colby 4 Denzel 8 
Bud 8 Conner 8 Dilbert 8 
Bubba 9 Custer 4 Don 1 
Burt 10 Cyan 2 Dylan 2
The data would be set up thus: 
Football 
Players 
Pizza 
Slices 
Consumed 
Basketball 
Players 
Pizza Slices 
Consumed 
Soccer 
Players 
Pizza Slices 
Consumed 
Ben 5 Cam 6 Dan 5 
Bob 7 Colby 4 Denzel 8 
Bud 8 Conner 8 Dilbert 8 
Bubba 9 Custer 4 Don 1 
Burt 10 Cyan 2 Dylan 2 
Notice how the individuals in these groups are 
different (hence different names)
The data would be set up thus: 
Football 
Players 
Pizza 
Slices 
Consumed 
Basketball 
Players 
Pizza Slices 
Consumed 
Soccer 
Players 
Pizza Slices 
Consumed 
Ben 5 Cam 6 Dan 5 
Bob 7 Colby 4 Denzel 8 
Bud 8 Conner 8 Dilbert 8 
Bubba 9 Custer 4 Don 1 
Burt 10 Cyan 2 Dylan 2 
Notice how the individuals in these groups are 
different (hence different names)
The data would be set up thus: 
Football 
Players 
Pizza 
Slices 
Consumed 
Basketball 
Players 
Pizza Slices 
Consumed 
Soccer 
Players 
Pizza Slices 
Consumed 
Ben 5 Ben 6 Ben 5 
Bob 7 Bob 4 Bob 8 
Bud 8 Bud 8 Bud 8 
Bubba 9 Bubba 4 Bubba 1 
Burt 10 Burt 2 Burt 2 
Notice how the individuals in these groups are 
different (hence different names) 
A Repeated Measures ANOVA is different than a 
One-Way ANOVA in one simply way: Only one 
group of person or observations is being 
measured, but they are measured more than 
one time.
The data would be set up thus: 
Football 
Players 
Pizza 
Slices 
Consumed 
Basketball 
Players 
Pizza Slices 
Consumed 
Soccer 
Players 
Pizza Slices 
Consumed 
Ben 5 Ben 6 Ben 5 
Bob 7 Bob 4 Bob 8 
Bud 8 Bud 8 Bud 8 
Bubba 9 Bubba 4 Bubba 1 
Burt 10 Burt 2 Burt 2 
Notice how the individuals in these groups are 
different (hence different names) 
A Repeated Measures ANOVA is different than a 
One-Way ANOVA in one simply way: Only one 
group of persons or observations is being 
measured, but they are measured more than 
one time.
Notice the different times football player pizza 
consumption is being measured. 
Football 
Players 
Pizza 
Slices 
Consumed 
Pizza Slices 
Consumed 
Pizza Slices 
Consumed 
Ben 5 Ben 6 Ben 5 
Bob 7 Bob 4 Bob 8 
Bud 8 Bud 8 Bud 8 
Bubba 9 Bubba 4 Bubba 1 
Burt 10 Burt 2 Burt 2
Notice the different times football player pizza 
consumption is being measured. 
Football 
Players 
Pizza 
Slices 
Consumed 
Before the 
Season 
Pizza Slices 
Consumed 
During the 
Season 
Pizza Slices 
Consumed 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 Ben 6 Ben 5 
Bob 7 Bob 4 Bob 8 
Bud 8 Bud 8 Bud 8 
Bubba 9 Bubba 4 Bubba 1 
Burt 10 Burt 2 Burt 2
Since only one group is being measured 3 times, 
each time is dependent on the previous time. 
By dependent we mean there is a relationship.
Since only one group is being measured 3 times, 
each time is dependent on the previous time. 
By dependent we mean there is a relationship. 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football Players Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6
Since only one group is being measured 3 times, 
each time is dependent on the previous time. 
By dependent we mean there is a relationship. 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football Players Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6 
The relationship between the scores is that we 
are comparing the same person across multiple 
observations.
So, Ben’s before-season and during-season and 
after-season scores have one important thing in 
common:
So, Ben’s before-season and during-season and 
after-season scores have one important thing in 
common: 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football Players Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6
So, Ben’s before-season and during-season and 
after-season scores have one important thing in 
common: THESE SCORES ALL BELONG TO BEN. 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football Players Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6
So, Ben’s before-season and during-season and 
after-season scores have one important thing in 
common: THESE SCORES ALL BELONG TO BEN. 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football Players Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6 
They are subject to all the factors that are 
special to Ben when consuming pizza, including 
how much he likes or dislikes, the toppings that 
are available, the eating atmosphere, etc.
What we want to find out is – how much the 
BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER season pizza 
consuming sessions differ.
What we want to find out is – how much the 
BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER season pizza 
consuming sessions differ. 
But we have to find a way to eliminate the 
variability that is caused by individual 
differences that linger across all three eating 
sessions. Once again we are not interested in 
the things that make Ben, Ben while eating pizza 
(like he’s a picky eater). We are interested in the 
effect of where we are in the season (BEFORE, 
DURING, and AFTER on Pizza consumption.)
What we want to find out is – how much the 
BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER season pizza 
consuming sessions differ. 
But we have to find a way to eliminate the 
variability that is caused by individual 
differences that linger across all three eating 
sessions. Once again we are not interested in 
the things that make Ben, Ben while eating pizza 
(like he’s a picky eater). We are interested in the 
effect of where we are in the season (BEFORE, 
DURING, and AFTER on Pizza consumption.)
What we want to find out is – how much the 
BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER season pizza 
consuming sessions differ. 
But we have to find a way to eliminate the 
variability that is caused by individual 
differences that linger across all three eating 
sessions. Once again we are not interested in 
the things that make Ben, Ben while eating pizza 
(like he’s a picky eater). We are interested in the 
effect of where we are in the season (BEFORE, 
DURING, and AFTER on Pizza consumption.)
That way we can focus just on the differences 
that are related to WHEN the pizza eating 
occurred.
That way we can focus just on the differences 
that are related to WHEN the pizza eating 
occurred. 
After running a repeated-measures ANOVA, this 
is the output that we will get:
That way we can focus just on the differences 
that are related to WHEN the pizza eating 
occurred. 
After running a repeated-measures ANOVA, this 
is the output that we will get: 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza slices 
Source 
Type III 
Sum of 
Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
This output will help us determine if we reject 
the null hypothesis:
This output will help us determine if we reject 
the null hypothesis: 
There is no significant difference in the amount 
of pizza consumed by football players before, 
during, and/or after the season.
This output will help us determine if we reject 
the null hypothesis: 
There is no significant difference in the amount 
of pizza consumed by football players before, 
during, and/or after the season. 
Or accept the alternative hypothesis:
This output will help us determine if we reject 
the null hypothesis: 
There is no significant difference in the amount 
of pizza consumed by football players before, 
during, and/or after the season. 
Or accept the alternative hypothesis: 
There is a significant difference in the amount of 
pizza consumed by football players before, 
during, and/or after the season.
To do so, let’s focus on the value .008
To do so, let’s focus on the value .008 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza slices consumed 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
To do so, let’s focus on the value .008 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: 
Pizza slices 
consumed 
Source 
Type III 
Sum of 
Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
To do so, let’s focus on the value .008 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: 
Pizza slices 
consumed 
Source 
Type III 
Sum of 
Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
This means that if we were to reject the null 
hypothesis, the probability that we would be 
wrong is 8 times out of 1000. As you remember, 
if that were to happen, it would be called a Type 
1 error.
To do so, let’s focus on the value .008 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: 
Pizza slices 
consumed 
Source 
Type III 
Sum of 
Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
This means that if we were to reject the null 
hypothesis, the probability that we would be 
wrong is 8 times out of 1000. As you remember, 
if that were to happen, it would be called a Type 
1 error.
But it is so unlikely, that we would be willing to 
take that risk and hence reject the null 
hypothesis.
But it is so unlikely, that we would be willing to 
take that risk and hence we reject the null 
hypothesis. 
There IS NO statistically significant difference 
between the number of slices of pizza 
consumed by football players before, during, or 
after the football season.
But it is so unlikely, that we would be willing to 
take that risk and hence we reject the null 
hypothesis. 
There IS NO statistically significant difference 
between the number of slices of pizza 
consumed by football players before, during, or 
after the football season.
And accept the alternative hypothesis:
And accept the alternative hypothesis: 
There IS A statistically significant difference 
between the number of slices of pizza 
consumed by football players before, during, or 
after the football season.
And accept the alternative hypothesis: 
There IS A statistically significant difference 
between the number of slices of pizza 
consumed by football players before, during, or 
after the football season.
Now we do not know which of the three are 
significantly different from one another or if all 
three are different. We just know that a 
difference exists.
Now we do not know which of the three are 
significantly different from one another or if all 
three are different. We just know that a 
difference exists. 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football Players Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6
Now we do not know which of the three are 
significantly different from one another or if all 
three are different. We just know that a 
difference exists. 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football Players Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6
Now we do not know which of the three are 
significantly different from one another or if all 
three are different. We just know that a 
difference exists. 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football Players Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6 
Later, we can run what is called a “Post-hoc” test 
to determine where the difference lies.
From this point on – we will delve into the 
actual calculations and formulas that produce a 
Repeated-measures ANOVA. If such detail is of 
interest or a necessity to know, please continue.
How was a significance value of .008 calculated?
How was a significance value of .008 calculated? 
Let’s begin with the calculation of the various 
sources of Sums of Squares
How was a significance value of .008 calculated? 
Let’s begin with the calculation of the various 
sources of Sums of Squares 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: 
Pizza slices 
consumed 
Source 
Type III 
Sum of 
Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between 
Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
We do this so that we can explain what is 
causing the scores to vary or deviate.
We do this so that we can explain what is 
causing the scores to vary or deviate. 
• Is it error?
We do this so that we can explain what is 
causing the scores to vary or deviate. 
• Is it error? 
• Is it differences between times (before, 
during, and after)?
We do this so that we can explain what is 
causing the scores to vary or deviate. 
• Is it error? 
• Is it differences between times (before, 
during, and after)? 
Remember, the full name for sum of squares is 
the sum of squared deviations about the mean. 
This will help us determine the amount of 
variation from each of the possible sources.
Let’s begin by calculating the total sums of 
squares.
Let’s begin by calculating the total sums of 
squares. 
푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푋 )2
Let’s begin by calculating the total sums of 
squares. 
푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푋 )2
Let’s begin by calculating the total sums of 
squares. 
푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푋 )2 
This means one pizza 
eating observation for 
person “I” (e.g., Ben) on 
time “j” (e.g., before)
For example:
For example: 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football Players Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6
For example: 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football Players Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6
For example: 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football Players Before the 
OR 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6
For example: 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football Players Before the 
OR 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football Players Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6
For example: 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football Players Before the 
OR 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football Players Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6
For example: 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football Players Before the 
OR 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6
For example: 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football Players Before the 
OR 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football Players Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6
For example: 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football Players Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
ETC 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6
푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푿)2
푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푿)2 
This means the 
average of all of the 
observations
푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푿)2 
This means the 
average of all of the 
observations 
This means one pizza 
eating observation for 
person “I” (e.g., Ben) on 
time “j” (e.g., before)
푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푿)2 
This means the 
average of all of the 
observations 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
This means one pizza 
eating observation for 
person “I” (e.g., Ben) on 
time “j” (e.g., before) 
Football Players Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6
푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푿)2 
This means the 
average of all of the 
observations 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football Players Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6 
Average of All 
Observations 
This means one pizza 
eating observation for 
person “I” (e.g., Ben) on 
time “j” (e.g., before)
푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푿)2 
This means 
sum or add 
everything up
푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푿
)2 
This means 
sum or add 
everything up 
This means 
the average of 
all of the 
observations
푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푿)2 
This means 
sum or add 
everything up 
This means 
the average of 
all of the 
observations 
This means one pizza 
eating observation for 
person “I” (e.g., Ben) on 
time “j” (e.g., before)
Let’s calculate total sums of squares with this 
data set:
Let’s calculate total sums of squares with this 
data set: 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football Players Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6
To do so we will rearrange the data like so:
To do so we will rearrange the data like so: 
Football 
Players 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt
To do so we will rearrange the data like so: 
Football 
Players 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Season 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
During 
During 
During 
During 
During 
After 
After 
After 
After 
After
To do so we will rearrange the data like so: 
Football 
Players 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Season 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
During 
During 
During 
During 
During 
After 
After 
After 
After 
After 
Slices of 
Pizza 
5 
7 
8 
9 
10 
4 
5 
7 
8 
7 
4 
5 
6 
4 
6
To do so we will rearrange the data like so: 
We will subtract each of these 
values from the grand mean, 
square the result and sum them 
all up. 
Football 
Players 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Season 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
During 
During 
During 
During 
During 
After 
After 
After 
After 
After 
Slices of 
Pizza 
5 
7 
8 
9 
10 
4 
5 
7 
8 
7 
4 
5 
6 
4 
6
To do so we will rearrange the data like so: 
We will subtract each of these 
values from the grand mean, 
square the result and sum them 
all up. 
Football 
Players 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Season 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
During 
During 
During 
During 
During 
After 
After 
After 
After 
After 
Slices of 
Pizza 
5 
7 
8 
9 
10 
4 
5 
7 
8 
7 
4 
5 
6 
4 
6 푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푋 )2
To do so we will rearrange the data like so: 
We will subtract each of these 
values from the grand mean, 
square the result and sum them 
all up. 
Football 
Players 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Season 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
During 
During 
During 
During 
During 
After 
After 
After 
After 
After 
Slices of 
Pizza 
5 
7 
8 
9 
10 
4 
5 
7 
Each 
8 
7 
observation 
4 
5 
6 
4 
푆푆2 
6 푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푋 )
To do so we will rearrange the data like so: 
We will subtract each of these 
values from the grand mean, 
square the result and sum them 
all up. 
Here is how we compute the 
Grand Mean = 
Football 
Players 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Season 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
During 
During 
During 
During 
During 
After 
After 
After 
After 
After 
Slices of 
Pizza 
5 
7 
8 
9 
10 
4 
5 
7 
8 
7 
4 
5 
6 
4 
6
To do so we will rearrange the data like so: 
We will subtract each of these 
values from the grand mean, 
square the result and sum them 
all up. 
Here is how we compute the 
Grand Mean = 
Football 
Players 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Season 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
During 
During 
During 
During 
During 
After 
After 
After 
After 
After 
Slices of 
Pizza 
5 
7 
8 
9 
10 
4 
5 
7 
8 
7 
4 
5 
6 
4 
6
To do so we will rearrange the data like so: 
We will subtract each of these 
values from the grand mean, 
square the result and sum them 
all up. 
Here is how we compute the 
Grand Mean = 
Football 
Players 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Season 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
During 
During 
During 
During 
During 
After 
After 
After 
After 
After 
Slices of 
Pizza 
5 
7 
8 
9 
10 
4 
5 
7 
8 
7 
4 
5 
6 
4 
6 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6
To do so we will rearrange the data like so: 
We will subtract each of these 
values from the grand mean, 
square the result and sum them 
all up. 
Here is how we compute the 
Grand Mean = 
Football 
Players 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Season 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
During 
During 
During 
During 
During 
After 
After 
After 
After 
After 
Slices of 
Pizza 
5 
7 
8 
9 
10 
4 
5 
7 
8 
7 
4 
5 
6 
4 
6 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6 
Average of All 
Observations = 
6.3
To do so we will rearrange the data like so: 
We will subtract each of these 
values from the grand mean, 
square the result and sum them 
all up. 
푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푋 )2 
Football 
Players 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Season 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
During 
During 
During 
During 
During 
After 
After 
After 
After 
After 
Slices of 
Pizza 
5 
7 
8 
9 
10 
4 
5 
7 
8 
7 
4 
5 
6 
4 
6 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
-
To do so we will rearrange the data like so: 
We will subtract each of these 
values from the grand mean, 
square the result and sum them 
all up. 
Football 
Players 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Season 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
During 
During 
During 
During 
During 
After 
After 
After 
After 
After 
Slices of 
Pizza 
5 
7 
8 
9 
10 
4 
5 
7 
8 
7 
4 
5 
6 
4 
6 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푋 )2
To do so we will rearrange the data like so: 
We will subtract each of 
these values from the 
grand mean, square the 
result and sum them all 
up. 
푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푋 )2 
Bob 
Bob 
Before 
During 
7 
5 
- 
- 
Football 
Players 
Season 
Slices of 
Pizza 
Grand 
Mean 
Ben 
Before 
5 
- 
6.3 
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 
Bud 
Before 
8 
- 
6.3 
Bubba 
Before 
9 
- 
6.3 
Burt 
Before 
10 
- 
6.3 
Ben 
During 
4 
- 
6.3 
Bob During 5 - 6.3 
Bud 
During 
7 
- 
6.3 
Bubba 
During 
8 
- 
6.3 
Burt 
During 
7 
- 
6.3 
Ben 
After 
4 
- 
6.3 
Bob 
After 
5 
- 
6.3 
Bud 
After 
6 
- 
6.3 
Bubba 
After 
4 
- 
6.3 
Burt 
After 
6 
- 
6.3
To do so we will rearrange the data like so: 
We will subtract each 
of these values from 
the grand mean, 
square the result and 
sum them all up. 
Football 
Players 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Season 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
During 
During 
During 
During 
During 
After 
After 
After 
After 
After 
Slices of 
Pizza 
5 
7 
8 
9 
10 
4 
5 
7 
8 
7 
4 
5 
6 
4 
6 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Football 
Players 
Season Slices of 
Pizza 
Grand 
Mean 
Ben Before 5 - 6.3 
= 
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 
= 
Bud Before 8 - 6.3 
= 
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 
= 
Burt Before 10 - 6.3 
= 
Ben During 4 - 6.3 
= 
Bob During 5 - 6.3 
= 
Bud During 7 - 6.3 
= 
Bubba During 8 - 6.3 
= 
Burt During 7 - 6.3 
= 
Ben After 4 - 6.3 
= 
Bob After 5 - 6.3 
= 
Bud After 6 - 6.3 
= 
Bubba After 4 - 6.3 
= 
Burt After 6 - 6.3 
=
To do so we will rearrange the data like so: 
We will subtract each 
of these values from 
the grand mean, 
square the result and 
sum them all up. 
Football 
Players 
Football 
Players 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 
Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 
Bubba 
Burt 
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 
Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 
Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 
Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 
Bubba 
Burt 
Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 
Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 
Ben 
Bob 
Bud 
Bubba 
Burt 
Season Slices 
Season 
of Pizza 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
Before 
During 
During 
During 
During 
During 
After 
After 
After 
After 
After 
Slices of 
Pizza 
5 
7 
8 
9 
10 
4 
5 
7 
8 
7 
4 
5 
6 
4 
6 
Grand 
Mean 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Football 
Players 
Season Slices of 
Pizza 
Grand 
Mean 
Deviation 
Ben Before 5 - 6.3 
= 
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 
= 
Bud Before 8 - 6.3 
= 
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 
= 
Burt Before 10 - 6.3 
= 
Ben During 4 - 6.3 
= 
Bob During 5 - 6.3 
= 
Bud During 7 - 6.3 
= 
Bubba During 8 - 6.3 
= 
Burt During 7 - 6.3 
= 
Ben After 4 - 6.3 
= 
Bob After 5 - 6.3 
= 
Bud After 6 - 6.3 
= 
Bubba After 4 - 6.3 
= 
Burt After 6 - 6.3 
= 
Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 
Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 
Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 
Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 
Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3
To do so we will rearrange the data like so: 
Football 
Players 
Season Slices of 
Pizza 
Grand 
Mean 
Deviation Squared 
Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 
Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 
Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 
Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 
Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 
Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 
Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 
Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 
Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 
Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 
Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 
Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 
Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 
We will subtract each of these values from the 
grand mean, square the result and sum them all 
up.
To do so we will rearrange the data like so: 
Football 
Players 
Season Slices of 
Pizza 
Grand 
Mean 
Deviation Squared 
Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 
Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 
Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 
Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 
Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 
Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 
Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 
Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 
Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 
Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 
Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 
Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 
Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 
= 49.3 
We will subtract each of these values from the 
grand mean, square the result and sum them all 
up.
To do so we will rearrange the data like so: 
Football 
Players 
Season Slices of 
Then – 
Pizza 
Grand 
Mean 
Deviation Squared 
Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 
Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 
Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 
Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 
Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 
Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 
Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 
Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 
Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 
Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 
Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 
Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 
Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 
= 49.3
To do so we will rearrange the data like so: 
Football 
Players 
Season Slices of 
Pizza 
Grand 
Mean 
Deviation Squared 
Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 
Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 
Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 
Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 
Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 
Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 
Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 
Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 
Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 
Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 
Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 
Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 
Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 
= 49.3 
Then – we place the total sums of squares result 
in the ANOVA table.
To do so we will rearrange the data like so: 
Football 
Players 
Season Slices of 
Pizza 
Grand 
Mean 
Deviation Squared 
Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 
Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 
Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 
Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 
Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 
Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 
Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 
Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 
Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 
Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 
Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 
Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 
Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 
= 49.3 
Then – we place the total sums of squares result 
in the ANOVA table.
Then – we place the total sums of squares result 
in the ANOVA table. 
Football 
Players 
Season Slices of 
Pizza 
Grand 
Mean 
Deviation Squared 
Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 
Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 
Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 
Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 
Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 
Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 
Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 
Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 
Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 
Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 
Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 
Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 
Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 
= 49.3
Then – we place the total sums of squares result 
in the ANOVA table. 
Football 
Players 
Season Slices of 
Pizza 
Grand 
Mean 
Deviation Squared 
Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 
Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 
Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 
Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 
Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 
Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 
Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 
Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 
Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 
Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 
Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 
Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 
Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 
= 49.3 Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza slices consumed 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
We have now calculated the total sums of 
squares. This is a good starting point. Because 
now we want to know of that total sums of 
squares how many sums of squares are 
generated from the following sources:
We have now calculated the total sums of 
squares. This is a good starting point. Because 
now we want to know of that total sums of 
squares how many sums of squares are 
generated from the following sources: 
• Between subjects (this is the variance we 
want to eliminate)
We have now calculated the total sums of 
squares. This is a good starting point. Because 
now we want to know of that total sums of 
squares how many sums of squares are 
generated from the following sources: 
• Between subjects (this is the variance we 
want to eliminate) 
• Between Groups (this would be between 
BEFORE, DURING, AFTER)
We have now calculated the total sums of 
squares. This is a good starting point. Because 
now we want to know of that total sums of 
squares how many sums of squares are 
generated from the following sources: 
• Between subjects (this is the variance we 
want to eliminate) 
• Between Groups (this would be between 
BEFORE, DURING, AFTER) 
• Error (the variance that we cannot explain 
with our design)
With these sums of squares we will be able to 
compute our F ratio value and then statistical 
significance.
With these sums of squares we will be able to 
compute our F ratio value and then statistical 
significance. 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza slices consumed 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
With these sums of squares we will be able to 
compute our F ratio value and then statistical 
significance. 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza slices consumed 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
Let’s calculate the sums of squares between 
subjects.
Remember if we were just computing a one way 
ANOVA the table would go from this:
Remember if we were just computing a one way 
ANOVA the table would go from this: 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza slices consumed 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
Remember if we were just computing a one way 
ANOVA the table would go from this: 
To this: 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza slices consumed 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
Remember if we were just computing a one way 
ANOVA the table would go from this: 
To this: 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza slices consumed 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza slices consumed 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 2.669 .078 
Error 29.600 8 3.700 
Total 49.333 14
Remember if we were just computing a one way 
ANOVA the table would go from this: 
To this: 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza slices consumed 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza slices consumed 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 2.669 .078 
Error 29.600 8 3.700 
Total 49.333 14
All of that variability goes into the error or 
within groups sums of squares (29.600) which 
makes the F statistic smaller (from 9.548 to 
2.669), the significance value no longer 
significant (.008 to .078).
All of that variability goes into the error or 
within groups sums of squares (29.600) which 
makes the F statistic smaller (from 9.548 to 
2.669), the significance value no longer 
significant (.008 to .078). 
But the difference in within groups variability is 
not a function of error, it is a function of Ben, 
Bob, Bud, Bubba, and Burt’s being different in 
terms of the amount of slices they eat regardless 
of when they eat!
All of that variability goes into the error or 
within groups sums of squares (29.600) which 
makes the F statistic smaller (from 9.548 to 
2.669), the significance value no longer 
significant (.008 to .078). 
But the difference in within groups variability is 
not a function of error, it is a function of Ben, 
Bob, Bud, Bubba, and Burt’s being different in 
terms of the amount of Pizza slices Slices Consumed 
they eat regardless 
Football 
Before the 
During the 
After the 
Average 
of when they eat! 
Players 
Season 
Season 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 
Burt 10 7 6 7.7
Here is a data set where there are not between 
group differences, but there is a lot of difference 
based on when the group eats their pizza:
Here is a data set where there are not between 
group differences, but there is a lot of difference 
based on when the group eats their pizza: 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Average 
Ben 1 5 9 5.0 
Bob 2 5 8 5.0 
Bud 3 5 7 5.0 
Bubba 1 5 9 5.0 
Burt 2 5 8 5.0
Here is a data set where there are not between 
group differences, but there is a lot of difference 
based on when the group eats their pizza: 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Average 
Ben 1 5 9 5.0 
Bob 2 5 8 5.0 
Bud 3 5 7 5.0 
Bubba 1 5 9 5.0 
Burt 2 5 8 5.0 
There is no variability between subjects (they 
are all 5.0).
Look at the variability between groups:
Look at the variability between groups: 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Average 
Ben 1 5 9 5.0 
Bob 2 5 8 5.0 
Bud 3 5 7 5.0 
Bubba 1 5 9 5.0 
Burt 2 5 8 5.0 
1.8 5.0 8.2
Look at the variability between groups: 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Average 
Ben 1 5 9 5.0 
Bob 2 5 8 5.0 
Bud 3 5 7 5.0 
Bubba 1 5 9 5.0 
Burt 2 5 8 5.0 
1.8 5.0 8.2 
They are very different from one another.
Here is what the ANOVA table would look like:
Here is what the ANOVA table would look like: 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza slices consumed 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 0.000 4 
Between Groups 102.400 2 51.200 73.143 .000 
Error 5.600 8 0.700 
Total 49.333 14
Here is what the ANOVA table would look like: 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza slices consumed 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 0.000 4 
Between Groups 102.400 2 51.200 73.143 .000 
Error 5.600 8 0.700 
Total 49.333 14 
Notice how there are no sum of squares values 
for the between subjects source of variability!
Here is what the ANOVA table would look like: 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza slices consumed 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 0.000 4 
Between Groups 102.400 2 51.200 73.143 .000 
Error 5.600 8 0.700 
Total 49.333 14 
Notice how there are no sum of squares values 
for the between subjects source of variability! 
But there is a lot of sum of squares values for 
the between groups.
Here is what the ANOVA table would look like: 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza slices consumed 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 0.000 4 
Between Groups 102.400 2 51.200 73.143 .000 
Error 5.600 8 0.700 
Total 49.333 14 
Notice how there are no sum of squares values 
for the between subjects source of variability! 
But there is a lot of sum of squares values for 
the between groups. 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza slices consumed 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 0.000 4 
Between Groups 102.400 2 51.200 73.143 .000 
Error 5.600 8 0.700 
Total 49.333 14
What would the data set look like if there was 
very little between groups (by season) variability 
and a great deal of between subjects variability:
What would the data set look like if there was 
very little between groups (by season) variability 
and a great deal of between subjects variability: 
Here it is:
What would the data set look like if there was 
very little between groups (by season) variability 
and a great deal of between subjects variability: 
Here it is: 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Average 
Ben 3 3 3 3.0 
Bob 5 5 5 5.0 
Bud 7 7 7 7.0 
Bubba 8 8 8 8.0 
Burt 12 12 13 12.3 
Between 
Subjects
In this case the between subjects (Ben, Bob, Bud 
. . .), are very different.
In this case the between subjects (Ben, Bob, Bud 
. . .), are very different. 
When you see between SUBJECTS averages that 
far away, you know that the sums of squares for 
between groups will be very large.
In this case the between subjects (Ben, Bob, Bud 
. . .), are very different. 
When you see between SUBJECTS averages that 
far away, you know that the sums of squares for 
between groups will be very large. 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza slices consumed 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 148.267 4 
Between Groups 0.133 2 0.067 1.000 .689 
Error 0.533 8 0.067 
Total 148.933 14
Notice, in contrast, as we compute the between 
group (seasons) average how close they are.
Notice, in contrast, as we compute the between 
group (seasons) average how close they are. 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Average 
Ben 3 3 3 3.0 
Bob 5 5 5 5.0 
Bud 7 7 7 7.0 
Bubba 8 8 8 8.0 
Burt 12 12 13 12.3 
7.0 7.0 7.2
Notice, in contrast, as we compute the between 
group (seasons) average how close they are. 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Average 
Ben 3 3 3 3.0 
Bob 5 5 5 5.0 
Bud 7 7 7 7.0 
Bubba 8 8 8 8.0 
Burt 12 12 13 12.3 
7.0 7.0 7.2 
Between 
Groups
Notice, in contrast, as we compute the between 
group (seasons) average how close they are. 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Average 
Ben 3 3 3 3.0 
Bob 5 5 5 5.0 
Bud 7 7 7 7.0 
Bubba 8 8 8 8.0 
Burt 12 12 13 12.3 
7.0 7.0 7.2 
Between 
Groups
When you see between group averages this 
close you know that the sums of squares for 
between groups will be very small.
When you see between group averages this 
close you know that the sums of squares for 
between groups will be very small. 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza slices consumed 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 148.267 4 
Between Groups 0.133 2 0.067 1.000 .689 
Error 0.533 8 0.067 
Total 148.933 14
When you see between group averages this 
close you know that the sums of squares for 
between groups will be very small. 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza slices consumed 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 148.267 4 
Between Groups 0.133 2 0.067 1.000 .689 
Error 0.533 8 0.067 
Total 148.933 14 
Now that we have conceptually considered the 
sources of variability as described by the sum of 
squares, let’s begin calculating between 
subjects, between groups, and the error 
sources.
We will begin with calculating Between Subjects 
sum of squares.
We will begin with calculating Between Subjects 
sum of squares. 
To do so, let’s return to our original data set:
We will begin with calculating Between Subjects 
sum of squares. 
To do so, let’s return to our original data set: 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6
We will begin with calculating Between Subjects 
sum of squares. 
To do so, let’s return to our original data set: 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6 
Here is the formula for calculating SS between 
subjects.
We will begin with calculating Between Subjects 
sum of squares. 
To do so, let’s return to our original data set: 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6 
Here is the formula for calculating SS between 
subjects. 
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푋푏푠 − 푋 )2
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Average 
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 
Burt 10 7 6 7.7
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 
This means the 
average of between 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Average 
subjects 
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 
Burt 10 7 6 7.7
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Average minus 
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 -
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 
This means the 
average of all of 
the observations
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again:
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6 
Average of All 
Observations = 
6.3
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: 
Now we subtract each subject or person average 
from the Grand Mean.
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: 
Now we subtract each subject or person average 
from the Grand Mean. 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Average minus Grand 
Mean 
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 
This means the 
average of all of 
the observations
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: 
Now we subtract each subject or person average 
from the Grand Mean. 
This gives us the person’s average score 
deviation from the total or grand mean.
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: 
Now we subtract each subject or person average 
from the Grand Mean. 
This gives us the person’s average score 
deviation from the total or grand mean. Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Average minus Grand 
Mean 
Deviation 
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: 
Now we subtract each subject or person average 
from the Grand Mean. 
This gives us the person’s average score 
deviation from the total or grand mean. 
Now we will square the deviations.
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: 
Now we subtract each subject or person average 
from the Grand Mean. 
This gives us the person’s average score 
deviation from the total or grand mean. 
Now we will square the deviations.
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: 
Now we subtract each subject or person average 
from the Grand Mean. 
This gives us the person’s average score 
deviation Pizza Slices from Consumed 
the total or grand mean. 
Football 
Before 
During the 
After the 
Average minus Grand 
Deviation Squared 
Players 
the 
Season 
Season 
Mean 
Now Season 
we will square the deviations 
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: 
Now we subtract each subject or person average 
from the Grand Mean. 
This gives us the person’s average score 
deviation from the total or grand mean. 
Now we will square the deviations. 
Then we sum all of these squared deviations.
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: 
Now we subtract each subject or person average 
from the Grand Mean. 
This gives us the person’s average score 
deviation from the total or grand mean. 
Now we will square the deviations. 
Then we sum all of these squared deviations.
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: 
Now we subtract each subject or person average 
from the Grand Mean. 
This gives Pizza Slices us Consumed 
the person’s average score 
deviation Football 
Before 
During from the 
After the the 
Average minus Grand 
Deviation Squared 
Players 
the 
Season 
Season 
total or Mean 
grand mean. 
Season 
Now Ben we 5 will 4 square 4 4.3 the - deviations. 
6.3 -2.0 3.9 
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 
Then Bud we 8 sum 7 all 6 of these 7.0 - 6.3 squared 0.7 deviations. 
0.5 
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 
7.1 
Sum 
up
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: 
Now we subtract each subject or person average 
from the Grand Mean. 
This gives us the person’s average score 
deviation from the total or grand mean. 
Now we will square the deviations. 
Then we sum all of these squared deviations. 
Finally, we multiply the sum all of these squared 
deviations by the number of groups:
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before 
the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Average minus Grand 
Mean 
Deviation Squared 
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 
7.1 
Times 3 groups 
Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before 
the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Average minus Grand 
Mean 
Deviation Squared 
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 
Number of 
conditions 
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 
7.1 
Times 3 groups 
Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before 
the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Average minus Grand 
Mean 
Deviation Squared 
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 
7.1 
Times 3 groups 
Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before 
the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Average minus Grand 
Mean 
Deviation Squared 
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 
7.1 
Times 3 groups 
Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before 
the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Average minus Grand 
Mean 
Deviation Squared 
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 
7.1 
Times 3 groups 
Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3 
1 2 3
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before 
the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Average minus Grand 
Mean 
Deviation Squared 
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 
7.1 
Times 3 groups 
Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3 
1 2 3
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before 
the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza slices consumed 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
After the 
Season 
Average minus Grand 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
Mean 
Deviation Squared 
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 
7.1 
Times 3 groups 
Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3 
1 2 3
푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before 
the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Average minus Grand 
Mean 
Deviation Squared 
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 
7.1 
Times 3 groups 
Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3 
1 2 3 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza slices consumed 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
Now it is time to compute the between groups 
(seasons) sum of squares.
Now it is time to compute the between groups’ 
(seasons) sum of squares. 
Here is the equation we will use to compute it:
Now it is time to compute the between groups’ 
(seasons) sum of squares. 
Here is the equation we will use to compute it: 
푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 )
Let’s break this down with our data set:
Let’s break this down with our data set: 
푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 )
Let’s break this down with our data set: 
푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 ) 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6
We begin by computing the mean of each 
condition (k) 
푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 ) 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6
We begin by computing the mean of each 
condition (k) 
푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 ) 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6 
Condition 
Mean
We begin by computing the mean of each 
condition (k) 
푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 ) 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6 
Condition 
Mean 
7.8
We begin by computing the mean of each 
condition (k) 
푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 ) 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6 
Condition 
Mean 
7.8 
6.2
We begin by computing the mean of each 
condition (k) 
푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 ) 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6 
Condition 
Mean 
7.8 
6.2 
5.0
Then subtract each condition mean from the 
grand mean. 
푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 ) 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6 
Condition 
Mean 
7.8 
6.2 
5.0
Then subtract each condition mean from the 
grand mean. 
푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 ) 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6 
Condition 
Mean 
7.8 
6.2 
5.0 
minus - - -
Then subtract each condition mean from the 
grand mean. 
푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 ) 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6 
Condition 
Mean 
7.8 6.2 5.0 
minus - - - 
Grand 
Mean 
6.3 6.3 6.3
Then subtract each condition mean from the 
grand mean. 
푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 ) 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6 
Condition 
Mean 
7.8 6.2 5.0 
minus - - - 
Grand 
Mean 
6.3 6.3 6.3 
equals 
Deviation 1.5 -0.1 -1.3
Square the deviation. 
푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 )ퟐ 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6 
Condition 
Mean 
7.8 6.2 5.0 
minus - - - 
Grand 
Mean 
6.3 6.3 6.3 
equals 
Deviation 1.5 -0.1 -1.3 
Squared 
Deviation 
2.2 0.0 1.8
Sum the Squared Deviations:
Sum the Squared Deviations: 푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 )ퟐ
Sum the Squared Deviations: 푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 )ퟐ 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6 
Condition 
Mean 
7.8 6.2 5.0 
minus - - - 
Grand 
Mean 
6.3 6.3 6.3 
equals 
Deviation 1.5 -0.1 -1.3 
Squared 
Deviation 
2.2 0.0 1.8 
Sum
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Sum the Squared Deviations: Bob 7 5 푛 ∗ 5 
Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 )ퟐ 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6 
Condition 
Mean 
7.8 6.2 5.0 
minus - - - 
Grand 
Mean 
6.3 6.3 6.3 
equals 
Deviation 1.5 -0.1 -1.3 
Squared 
Deviation 
2.2 0.0 1.8 
Sum 
3.95 
Sum of Squared 
Deviations
Multiply by the number of observations per 
condition (number of pizza eating slices across 
before, during, and after).
Multiply by the number of observations per 
condition (number of pizza eating slices across 
before, during, and after). 
3.95 
Sum of Squared 
Deviations
Multiply by the number of observations per 
condition (number of pizza eating slices across 
before, during, and after). 
3.95 
Sum of Squared 
Deviations
Multiply by the number of observations per 
condition (number of pizza eating slices across 
before, during, and after). 
3.95 
Sum of Squared 
Deviations 
5 
Number of 
observations
Multiply by the number of observations per 
condition (number of pizza eating slices across 
before, during, and after). 
3.95 
Sum of Squared 
Deviations 
5 
Number of 
observations
Multiply by the number of observations per 
condition (number of pizza eating slices across 
before, during, and after). 
3.95 
Sum of Squared 
Deviations 
5 
Number of 
observations 
19.7 
Weighted Sum of 
Squared Deviations
Let’s return to the ANOVA table and put the 
weighted sum of squared deviations.
Let’s return to the ANOVA table and put the 
weighted sum of squared deviations. 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza_slices 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
Let’s return to the ANOVA table and put the 
weighted sum of squared deviations. 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza_slices 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
3.95 
Sum of Squared 
Deviations 
5 
Number of 
observations 
19.7 
Weighted Sum of 
Squared Deviations
Let’s return to the ANOVA table and put the 
weighted sum of squared deviations. 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza_slices 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
3.95 
Sum of Squared 
Deviations 
5 
Number of 
observations 
19.7 
Weighted Sum of 
Squared Deviations
So far we have calculated Total Sum of Squares 
along with Sum of Squares for Between 
Subjects, and Between Groups.
So far we have calculated Total Sum of Squares 
along with Sum of Squares along with Sum of 
Squares for Between Subjects, Between Groups. 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza_slices 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
Now we will calculate the sum of squares 
associated with Error.
Now we will calculate the sum of squares 
associated with Error. 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
To do this we simply add the between subjects 
and between groups sums of squares.
To do this we simply add the between subjects 
and between groups sums of squares. 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
To do this we simply add the between subjects 
and between groups sums of squares. 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
21.333 
Between Subjects 
Sum of Squares 
19.733 
Between Groups 
Sum of Squares 
41.600 
Between Subjects & 
Groups Sum of 
Squares Combined
Then we subtract the Between Subjects & Group 
Sum of Squares Combined (41.600) from the 
Total Sum of Squares (49.333)
Then we subtract the Between Subjects & Group 
Sum of Squares Combined (41.600) from the 
Total Sum of Squares (49.333) 
49.333 
Total Sum of Squares 
41.600 
Between Subjects & 
Groups Sum of Squares 
Combined 
8.267 
Sum of Squares 
Attributed to Error 
or Unexplained
Then we subtract the Between Subjects & Group 
Sum of Squares Combined (41.600) from the 
Total Sum of Squares (49.333) 
49.333 
Total Sum of Squares 
41.600 
Between Subjects & 
Groups Sum of Squares 
Combined 
8.267 
Sum of Squares 
Attributed to Error 
or Unexplained 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
Now we have all of the information necessary to 
determine if there is a statistically significant 
difference between pizza slices consumed by 
football players between three different eating 
occasions (before, during or after the season).
Now we have all of the information necessary to 
determine if there is a statistically significant 
difference between pizza slices consumed by 
football players between three different eating 
occasions (before, during or after the season). 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
To calculate the significance level
To calculate the significance level 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
We must calculate the F ratio
We must calculate the F ratio 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
Which is calculated by dividing the Between 
Groups Mean Square value (9.867) by the Error 
Mean Square value (1.033).
Which is calculated by dividing the Between 
Groups Mean Square value (9.867) by the Error 
Mean Square value (1.033). 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 = 
9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
Which is calculated by dividing the sum of 
squares between groups by its degrees of 
freedom, as shown below:
Which is calculated by dividing the sum of 
squares between groups by its degrees of 
freedom, as shown below: 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 = 
9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
Which is calculated by dividing the sum of 
squares between groups by its degrees of 
freedom, as shown below: 
And 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 = 
9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
Which is calculated by dividing the sum of 
squares between groups by its degrees of 
freedom, as shown below: 
= 
And 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 = 
1.033 
Total 49.333 14
Which is calculated by dividing the sum of 
squares between groups by its degrees of 
freedom, as shown below: 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 = 
9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
And 
Source 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 = 
1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
Now we need to figure out how we calculate 
degrees of freedom for each source of sums of 
squares.
Let’s begin with determining the degrees of 
freedom Between Subjects.
Let’s begin with determining the degrees of 
freedom Between Subjects.
Let’s begin with determining the degrees of 
freedom Between Subjects. 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
Let’s begin with determining the degrees of 
freedom Between Subjects. 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
We take the number of subjects which, in this 
case, is 5 – 1 = 4
Let’s begin with determining the degrees of 
freedom Between Subjects. 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
We take the number of subjects which, in this 
case, is 5 – 1 = 4
Let’s begin with determining the degrees of 
freedom Between Subjects. 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
We take the number of subjects which, in this 
case, is 5 – 1 = 4 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Average 
Ben 3 3 3 3.0 
Bob 5 5 5 5.0 
Bud 7 7 7 7.0 
Bubba 8 8 8 8.0 
Burt 12 12 13 12.3 
Between 
Subjects 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5
Now – onto Between Groups Degrees of 
Freedom (df)
Now – onto Between Groups Degrees of 
Freedom (df) 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
Now – onto Between Groups Degrees of 
Freedom (df) 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
We take the number of groups which in this case 
is 3 – 1 = 2
Now – onto Between Groups Degrees of 
Freedom (df) 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
We take the number of groups which in this case 
is 3 – 1 = 2
Now – onto Between Groups Degrees of 
Freedom (df) 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
We take the number of groups which in this case 
is 3 – 1 = 2 
1 2 3 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6
Now – onto Between Groups Degrees of 
Freedom (df) 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
We take the number of groups which in this case 
is 3 – 1 = 2 
1 2 3 
Pizza Slices Consumed 
Football 
Players 
Before the 
Season 
During the 
Season 
After the 
Season 
Ben 5 4 4 
Bob 7 5 5 
Bud 8 7 6 
Bubba 9 8 4 
Burt 10 7 6
The error degrees of freedom are calculated by 
multiplying the between subjects by the 
between groups degrees of freedom.
The error degrees of freedom are calculated by 
multiplying the between subjects by the 
between groups degrees of freedom. 
4 
Between Subjects 
Degrees of Freedom 
2 
Between Groups 
Degrees of Freedom 
8 
Error Degrees of 
Freedom
The error degrees of freedom are calculated by 
multiplying the between subjects by the 
between groups degrees of freedom. 
4 
Between Subjects 
Degrees of Freedom 
2 
Between Groups 
Degrees of Freedom 
8 
Error Degrees of 
Freedom 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
The error degrees of freedom are calculated by 
multiplying the between subjects by the 
between groups degrees of freedom. 
4 
Between Subjects 
Degrees of Freedom 
2 
Between Groups 
Degrees of Freedom 
8 
Error Degrees of 
Freedom 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
The degrees of freedom for total sum of squares 
is calculated by adding all of the degrees of 
freedom from the other three sources.
The degrees of freedom for total sum of squares 
is calculated by adding all of the degrees of 
freedom from the other three sources. 
4 2 8 14
The degrees of freedom for total sum of squares 
is calculated by adding all of the degrees of 
freedom from the other three sources. 
4 2 8 14 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
The degrees of freedom for total sum of squares 
is calculated by adding all of the degrees of 
freedom from the other three sources. 
4 2 8 14 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
We will compute the Mean Square values for 
just the Between Groups and Error. We are not 
interested in what is happening with Between 
Subjects. We calculated the Between Subjects 
sum of squares only take out any differences 
that are a function of differences that would 
exist regardless of what group we were looking 
at.
Once again, if we had not pulled out Between 
Subjects sums of squares, then the Between 
Subjects would be absorbed in the error value:
Once again, if we had not pulled out Between 
Subjects sums of squares, then the Between 
Subjects would be absorbed in the error value: 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza_slices 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
Once again, if we had not pulled out Between 
Subjects sums of squares, then the Between 
Subjects would be absorbed in the error value: 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza_slices 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047 
Within Groups 29.600 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
Once again, if we had not pulled out Between 
Subjects sums of squares, then the Between 
Subjects would be absorbed in the error value: 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza_slices 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047 
Within Groups 29.600 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14
Once again, if we had not pulled out Between 
Subjects sums of squares, then the Between 
Subjects would be absorbed in the error value: 
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects 
Measure: Pizza_slices 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047 
Within Groups 29.600 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
Within Groups is 
another way of 
saying Error
And that would have created a larger error 
mean square value:
And that would have created a larger error 
mean square value: 
Measure: Pizza_slices 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
Measure: Pizza_slices 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047 
Error 29.600 12 2.467 
Total 49.333 14
And that would have created a larger error 
mean square value: 
Measure: Pizza_slices 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
Measure: Pizza_slices 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047 
Error 29.600 12 2.467 
Total 49.333 14
Which in turn would have created a smaller F 
value:
Which in turn would have created a smaller F 
value: 
Measure: Pizza_slices 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
Measure: Pizza_slices 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047 
Error 29.600 12 2.467 
Total 49.333 14
Which in turn would have created a smaller F 
value: 
Measure: Pizza_slices 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
Measure: Pizza_slices 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
= 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 = 
4.000 .047 
Error 29.600 12 2.467 
Total 49.333 14
Which in turn would have created a larger 
significance value:
Which in turn would have created a larger 
significance value: 
Measure: Pizza_slices 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Subjects 21.333 4 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 
Error 8.267 8 1.033 
Total 49.333 14 
Measure: Pizza_slices 
Source 
Type III Sum 
of Squares df 
Mean 
Square F Sig. 
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047 
Error 29.600 12 2.467 
Total 49.333 14
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?

More Related Content

What's hot

Lead Scoring Case Study
Lead Scoring Case StudyLead Scoring Case Study
Lead Scoring Case Study
LumbiniSardare
 
Sem with amos ii
Sem with amos iiSem with amos ii
Sem with amos ii
Jordan Sitorus
 
Effect size presentation.rob
Effect size presentation.robEffect size presentation.rob
Effect size presentation.rob
Rob Darrow
 
Reporting pearson correlation in apa
Reporting pearson correlation in apaReporting pearson correlation in apa
Reporting pearson correlation in apa
Ken Plummer
 
Reporting chi square goodness of fit test of independence in apa
Reporting chi square goodness of fit test of independence in apaReporting chi square goodness of fit test of independence in apa
Reporting chi square goodness of fit test of independence in apa
Ken Plummer
 
Regression
RegressionRegression
Regression
mandrewmartin
 
Simulating data to gain insights into power and p-hacking
Simulating data to gain insights intopower and p-hackingSimulating data to gain insights intopower and p-hacking
Simulating data to gain insights into power and p-hacking
Dorothy Bishop
 
Single linear regression
Single linear regressionSingle linear regression
Single linear regression
Ken Plummer
 
PhD Defense - Example-Dependent Cost-Sensitive Classification
PhD Defense - Example-Dependent Cost-Sensitive ClassificationPhD Defense - Example-Dependent Cost-Sensitive Classification
PhD Defense - Example-Dependent Cost-Sensitive Classification
Alejandro Correa Bahnsen, PhD
 
Statistics - Simple Linear and Multiple Linear Regression
Statistics - Simple Linear and Multiple Linear RegressionStatistics - Simple Linear and Multiple Linear Regression
Statistics - Simple Linear and Multiple Linear Regression
Bryll Edison Par
 
Null hypothesis for partial correlation
Null hypothesis for partial correlationNull hypothesis for partial correlation
Null hypothesis for partial correlation
Ken Plummer
 
Regression (Linear Regression and Logistic Regression) by Akanksha Bali
Regression (Linear Regression and Logistic Regression) by Akanksha BaliRegression (Linear Regression and Logistic Regression) by Akanksha Bali
Regression (Linear Regression and Logistic Regression) by Akanksha Bali
Akanksha Bali
 
CFA Fit Statistics
CFA Fit StatisticsCFA Fit Statistics
CFA Fit Statistics
nicolalritter
 
Chapter 11
Chapter 11 Chapter 11
Chapter 11
Tuul Tuul
 
multiple linear regression
multiple linear regressionmultiple linear regression
multiple linear regression
Akhilesh Joshi
 
Analyzing survey data
Analyzing survey dataAnalyzing survey data
Analyzing survey data
Fatima Sultana
 
Ibmathstudiesinternalassessmentfinaldraft 101208070253-phpapp02
Ibmathstudiesinternalassessmentfinaldraft 101208070253-phpapp02Ibmathstudiesinternalassessmentfinaldraft 101208070253-phpapp02
Ibmathstudiesinternalassessmentfinaldraft 101208070253-phpapp02
Travis Hayes
 
How to input data in spss for independent samples t tests
How to input data in spss for independent samples t testsHow to input data in spss for independent samples t tests
How to input data in spss for independent samples t tests
Ken Plummer
 
Effect size
Effect sizeEffect size
Effect size
Sr Edith Bogue
 
Reporting a one way repeated measures anova
Reporting a one way repeated measures anovaReporting a one way repeated measures anova
Reporting a one way repeated measures anova
Ken Plummer
 

What's hot (20)

Lead Scoring Case Study
Lead Scoring Case StudyLead Scoring Case Study
Lead Scoring Case Study
 
Sem with amos ii
Sem with amos iiSem with amos ii
Sem with amos ii
 
Effect size presentation.rob
Effect size presentation.robEffect size presentation.rob
Effect size presentation.rob
 
Reporting pearson correlation in apa
Reporting pearson correlation in apaReporting pearson correlation in apa
Reporting pearson correlation in apa
 
Reporting chi square goodness of fit test of independence in apa
Reporting chi square goodness of fit test of independence in apaReporting chi square goodness of fit test of independence in apa
Reporting chi square goodness of fit test of independence in apa
 
Regression
RegressionRegression
Regression
 
Simulating data to gain insights into power and p-hacking
Simulating data to gain insights intopower and p-hackingSimulating data to gain insights intopower and p-hacking
Simulating data to gain insights into power and p-hacking
 
Single linear regression
Single linear regressionSingle linear regression
Single linear regression
 
PhD Defense - Example-Dependent Cost-Sensitive Classification
PhD Defense - Example-Dependent Cost-Sensitive ClassificationPhD Defense - Example-Dependent Cost-Sensitive Classification
PhD Defense - Example-Dependent Cost-Sensitive Classification
 
Statistics - Simple Linear and Multiple Linear Regression
Statistics - Simple Linear and Multiple Linear RegressionStatistics - Simple Linear and Multiple Linear Regression
Statistics - Simple Linear and Multiple Linear Regression
 
Null hypothesis for partial correlation
Null hypothesis for partial correlationNull hypothesis for partial correlation
Null hypothesis for partial correlation
 
Regression (Linear Regression and Logistic Regression) by Akanksha Bali
Regression (Linear Regression and Logistic Regression) by Akanksha BaliRegression (Linear Regression and Logistic Regression) by Akanksha Bali
Regression (Linear Regression and Logistic Regression) by Akanksha Bali
 
CFA Fit Statistics
CFA Fit StatisticsCFA Fit Statistics
CFA Fit Statistics
 
Chapter 11
Chapter 11 Chapter 11
Chapter 11
 
multiple linear regression
multiple linear regressionmultiple linear regression
multiple linear regression
 
Analyzing survey data
Analyzing survey dataAnalyzing survey data
Analyzing survey data
 
Ibmathstudiesinternalassessmentfinaldraft 101208070253-phpapp02
Ibmathstudiesinternalassessmentfinaldraft 101208070253-phpapp02Ibmathstudiesinternalassessmentfinaldraft 101208070253-phpapp02
Ibmathstudiesinternalassessmentfinaldraft 101208070253-phpapp02
 
How to input data in spss for independent samples t tests
How to input data in spss for independent samples t testsHow to input data in spss for independent samples t tests
How to input data in spss for independent samples t tests
 
Effect size
Effect sizeEffect size
Effect size
 
Reporting a one way repeated measures anova
Reporting a one way repeated measures anovaReporting a one way repeated measures anova
Reporting a one way repeated measures anova
 

Viewers also liked

Null hypothesis for an ANCOVA
Null hypothesis for an ANCOVANull hypothesis for an ANCOVA
Null hypothesis for an ANCOVA
Ken Plummer
 
Reporting an ANCOVA
Reporting an ANCOVAReporting an ANCOVA
Reporting an ANCOVA
Ken Plummer
 
T14 anova
T14 anovaT14 anova
T14 anova
kompellark
 
Anova single factor
Anova single factorAnova single factor
Anova single factor
Dhruv Patel
 
Imad Feneir - One way anova
Imad Feneir - One way anovaImad Feneir - One way anova
Imad Feneir - One way anova
Imad Feneir
 
Imad Feneir - Two-way ANOVA - replication
Imad Feneir - Two-way ANOVA - replicationImad Feneir - Two-way ANOVA - replication
Imad Feneir - Two-way ANOVA - replication
Imad Feneir
 
Anova (Statistics)
Anova (Statistics)Anova (Statistics)
Anova (Statistics)
Ibrahim Abdullah
 
In Anova
In  AnovaIn  Anova
In Anova
ahmad bassiouny
 
One way anova final ppt.
One way anova final ppt.One way anova final ppt.
One way anova final ppt.
Aadab Mushrib
 
Analysis of variance anova
Analysis of variance anovaAnalysis of variance anova
Basic One-Way ANOVA
Basic One-Way ANOVABasic One-Way ANOVA
Basic One-Way ANOVA
stevenerrington
 
One-way ANOVA for Completely Randomized Design (CRD)
One-way ANOVA for Completely Randomized Design (CRD)One-way ANOVA for Completely Randomized Design (CRD)
One-way ANOVA for Completely Randomized Design (CRD)
Siti Nur Adila Hamzah
 
How many levels?
How many levels?How many levels?
How many levels?
Ken Plummer
 
What is the Mode?
What is the Mode?What is the Mode?
What is the Mode?
Ken Plummer
 
What is a Kendall's Tau (independence)?
What is a Kendall's Tau (independence)?What is a Kendall's Tau (independence)?
What is a Kendall's Tau (independence)?
Ken Plummer
 
Teach me ordinal or scaled (central tendency)
Teach me   ordinal or scaled (central tendency)Teach me   ordinal or scaled (central tendency)
Teach me ordinal or scaled (central tendency)
Ken Plummer
 
Null hypothesis for a single-sample t-test
Null hypothesis for a single-sample t-testNull hypothesis for a single-sample t-test
Null hypothesis for a single-sample t-test
Ken Plummer
 
Are there covariates?
Are there covariates?Are there covariates?
Are there covariates?
Ken Plummer
 
Null hypothesis for point biserial
Null hypothesis for point biserialNull hypothesis for point biserial
Null hypothesis for point biserial
Ken Plummer
 
Quick reminder ordinal, scaled or nominal proportional
Quick reminder   ordinal, scaled or nominal proportionalQuick reminder   ordinal, scaled or nominal proportional
Quick reminder ordinal, scaled or nominal proportional
Ken Plummer
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Null hypothesis for an ANCOVA
Null hypothesis for an ANCOVANull hypothesis for an ANCOVA
Null hypothesis for an ANCOVA
 
Reporting an ANCOVA
Reporting an ANCOVAReporting an ANCOVA
Reporting an ANCOVA
 
T14 anova
T14 anovaT14 anova
T14 anova
 
Anova single factor
Anova single factorAnova single factor
Anova single factor
 
Imad Feneir - One way anova
Imad Feneir - One way anovaImad Feneir - One way anova
Imad Feneir - One way anova
 
Imad Feneir - Two-way ANOVA - replication
Imad Feneir - Two-way ANOVA - replicationImad Feneir - Two-way ANOVA - replication
Imad Feneir - Two-way ANOVA - replication
 
Anova (Statistics)
Anova (Statistics)Anova (Statistics)
Anova (Statistics)
 
In Anova
In  AnovaIn  Anova
In Anova
 
One way anova final ppt.
One way anova final ppt.One way anova final ppt.
One way anova final ppt.
 
Analysis of variance anova
Analysis of variance anovaAnalysis of variance anova
Analysis of variance anova
 
Basic One-Way ANOVA
Basic One-Way ANOVABasic One-Way ANOVA
Basic One-Way ANOVA
 
One-way ANOVA for Completely Randomized Design (CRD)
One-way ANOVA for Completely Randomized Design (CRD)One-way ANOVA for Completely Randomized Design (CRD)
One-way ANOVA for Completely Randomized Design (CRD)
 
How many levels?
How many levels?How many levels?
How many levels?
 
What is the Mode?
What is the Mode?What is the Mode?
What is the Mode?
 
What is a Kendall's Tau (independence)?
What is a Kendall's Tau (independence)?What is a Kendall's Tau (independence)?
What is a Kendall's Tau (independence)?
 
Teach me ordinal or scaled (central tendency)
Teach me   ordinal or scaled (central tendency)Teach me   ordinal or scaled (central tendency)
Teach me ordinal or scaled (central tendency)
 
Null hypothesis for a single-sample t-test
Null hypothesis for a single-sample t-testNull hypothesis for a single-sample t-test
Null hypothesis for a single-sample t-test
 
Are there covariates?
Are there covariates?Are there covariates?
Are there covariates?
 
Null hypothesis for point biserial
Null hypothesis for point biserialNull hypothesis for point biserial
Null hypothesis for point biserial
 
Quick reminder ordinal, scaled or nominal proportional
Quick reminder   ordinal, scaled or nominal proportionalQuick reminder   ordinal, scaled or nominal proportional
Quick reminder ordinal, scaled or nominal proportional
 

Similar to What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?

Tutorial repeated measures ANOVA
Tutorial   repeated measures ANOVATutorial   repeated measures ANOVA
Tutorial repeated measures ANOVA
Ken Plummer
 
Reliability and validity
Reliability and validityReliability and validity
Reliability and validity
Kaimrc_Rss_Jd
 
experimental control
experimental controlexperimental control
experimental control
ROBERTOENRIQUEGARCAA1
 
What is a paired samples t test
What is a paired samples t testWhat is a paired samples t test
What is a paired samples t test
Ken Plummer
 
sampling experimental
sampling experimentalsampling experimental
sampling experimental
ROBERTOENRIQUEGARCAA1
 
Analysis of Variance
Analysis of VarianceAnalysis of Variance
Analysis of Variance
Michael770443
 
What is a one way anova?
What is a one way anova?What is a one way anova?
What is a one way anova?
Ken Plummer
 
ANOVA biostat easy explaination .pptx
ANOVA biostat easy explaination    .pptxANOVA biostat easy explaination    .pptx
ANOVA biostat easy explaination .pptx
DrDeveshPandey1
 
Levels of an independent variable (Practice Set)
Levels of an independent variable (Practice Set)Levels of an independent variable (Practice Set)
Levels of an independent variable (Practice Set)
Ken Plummer
 
1 Crosstabs Lesson 1 Running crosstabs to test you.docx
1  Crosstabs Lesson 1 Running crosstabs to test you.docx1  Crosstabs Lesson 1 Running crosstabs to test you.docx
1 Crosstabs Lesson 1 Running crosstabs to test you.docx
honey725342
 
Experimental design cartoon part 5 sample size
Experimental design cartoon part 5 sample sizeExperimental design cartoon part 5 sample size
Experimental design cartoon part 5 sample size
Kevin Hamill
 
Experiment basics
Experiment basicsExperiment basics
Experiment basics
ROBERTOENRIQUEGARCAA1
 
Central tendency, shape, or symmetry practice problems (2)
Central tendency, shape, or symmetry   practice problems (2)Central tendency, shape, or symmetry   practice problems (2)
Central tendency, shape, or symmetry practice problems (2)
Ken Plummer
 
Anova lecture
Anova lectureAnova lecture
Anova lecture
doublem44
 
Research design
Research designResearch design
Research design
Rebecca Miller-McGrath
 
designs_151.ppt
designs_151.pptdesigns_151.ppt
designs_151.ppt
faridagushybana
 
BUS 308 Week 3 Lecture 1 Examining Differences - Continued.docx
BUS 308 Week 3 Lecture 1 Examining Differences - Continued.docxBUS 308 Week 3 Lecture 1 Examining Differences - Continued.docx
BUS 308 Week 3 Lecture 1 Examining Differences - Continued.docx
curwenmichaela
 
One Way Anova
One Way AnovaOne Way Anova
One Way Anova
shoffma5
 
Levels of an independent variable (Practice)
Levels of an independent variable (Practice)Levels of an independent variable (Practice)
Levels of an independent variable (Practice)
Ken Plummer
 
Data.savQuestion.docxOver the same period, determine wheth.docx
Data.savQuestion.docxOver the same period, determine wheth.docxData.savQuestion.docxOver the same period, determine wheth.docx
Data.savQuestion.docxOver the same period, determine wheth.docx
theodorelove43763
 

Similar to What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA? (20)

Tutorial repeated measures ANOVA
Tutorial   repeated measures ANOVATutorial   repeated measures ANOVA
Tutorial repeated measures ANOVA
 
Reliability and validity
Reliability and validityReliability and validity
Reliability and validity
 
experimental control
experimental controlexperimental control
experimental control
 
What is a paired samples t test
What is a paired samples t testWhat is a paired samples t test
What is a paired samples t test
 
sampling experimental
sampling experimentalsampling experimental
sampling experimental
 
Analysis of Variance
Analysis of VarianceAnalysis of Variance
Analysis of Variance
 
What is a one way anova?
What is a one way anova?What is a one way anova?
What is a one way anova?
 
ANOVA biostat easy explaination .pptx
ANOVA biostat easy explaination    .pptxANOVA biostat easy explaination    .pptx
ANOVA biostat easy explaination .pptx
 
Levels of an independent variable (Practice Set)
Levels of an independent variable (Practice Set)Levels of an independent variable (Practice Set)
Levels of an independent variable (Practice Set)
 
1 Crosstabs Lesson 1 Running crosstabs to test you.docx
1  Crosstabs Lesson 1 Running crosstabs to test you.docx1  Crosstabs Lesson 1 Running crosstabs to test you.docx
1 Crosstabs Lesson 1 Running crosstabs to test you.docx
 
Experimental design cartoon part 5 sample size
Experimental design cartoon part 5 sample sizeExperimental design cartoon part 5 sample size
Experimental design cartoon part 5 sample size
 
Experiment basics
Experiment basicsExperiment basics
Experiment basics
 
Central tendency, shape, or symmetry practice problems (2)
Central tendency, shape, or symmetry   practice problems (2)Central tendency, shape, or symmetry   practice problems (2)
Central tendency, shape, or symmetry practice problems (2)
 
Anova lecture
Anova lectureAnova lecture
Anova lecture
 
Research design
Research designResearch design
Research design
 
designs_151.ppt
designs_151.pptdesigns_151.ppt
designs_151.ppt
 
BUS 308 Week 3 Lecture 1 Examining Differences - Continued.docx
BUS 308 Week 3 Lecture 1 Examining Differences - Continued.docxBUS 308 Week 3 Lecture 1 Examining Differences - Continued.docx
BUS 308 Week 3 Lecture 1 Examining Differences - Continued.docx
 
One Way Anova
One Way AnovaOne Way Anova
One Way Anova
 
Levels of an independent variable (Practice)
Levels of an independent variable (Practice)Levels of an independent variable (Practice)
Levels of an independent variable (Practice)
 
Data.savQuestion.docxOver the same period, determine wheth.docx
Data.savQuestion.docxOver the same period, determine wheth.docxData.savQuestion.docxOver the same period, determine wheth.docx
Data.savQuestion.docxOver the same period, determine wheth.docx
 

More from Ken Plummer

Diff rel gof-fit - jejit - practice (5)
Diff rel gof-fit - jejit - practice (5)Diff rel gof-fit - jejit - practice (5)
Diff rel gof-fit - jejit - practice (5)
Ken Plummer
 
Learn About Range - Copyright updated
Learn About Range - Copyright updatedLearn About Range - Copyright updated
Learn About Range - Copyright updated
Ken Plummer
 
Inferential vs descriptive tutorial of when to use - Copyright Updated
Inferential vs descriptive tutorial of when to use - Copyright UpdatedInferential vs descriptive tutorial of when to use - Copyright Updated
Inferential vs descriptive tutorial of when to use - Copyright Updated
Ken Plummer
 
Diff rel ind-fit practice - Copyright Updated
Diff rel ind-fit practice - Copyright UpdatedDiff rel ind-fit practice - Copyright Updated
Diff rel ind-fit practice - Copyright Updated
Ken Plummer
 
Normal or skewed distributions (inferential) - Copyright updated
Normal or skewed distributions (inferential) - Copyright updatedNormal or skewed distributions (inferential) - Copyright updated
Normal or skewed distributions (inferential) - Copyright updated
Ken Plummer
 
Normal or skewed distributions (descriptive both2) - Copyright updated
Normal or skewed distributions (descriptive both2) - Copyright updatedNormal or skewed distributions (descriptive both2) - Copyright updated
Normal or skewed distributions (descriptive both2) - Copyright updated
Ken Plummer
 
Nature of the data practice - Copyright updated
Nature of the data practice - Copyright updatedNature of the data practice - Copyright updated
Nature of the data practice - Copyright updated
Ken Plummer
 
Nature of the data (spread) - Copyright updated
Nature of the data (spread) - Copyright updatedNature of the data (spread) - Copyright updated
Nature of the data (spread) - Copyright updated
Ken Plummer
 
Mode practice 1 - Copyright updated
Mode practice 1 - Copyright updatedMode practice 1 - Copyright updated
Mode practice 1 - Copyright updated
Ken Plummer
 
Nature of the data (descriptive) - Copyright updated
Nature of the data (descriptive) - Copyright updatedNature of the data (descriptive) - Copyright updated
Nature of the data (descriptive) - Copyright updated
Ken Plummer
 
Dichotomous or scaled
Dichotomous or scaledDichotomous or scaled
Dichotomous or scaled
Ken Plummer
 
Skewed less than 30 (ties)
Skewed less than 30 (ties)Skewed less than 30 (ties)
Skewed less than 30 (ties)
Ken Plummer
 
Skewed sample size less than 30
Skewed sample size less than 30Skewed sample size less than 30
Skewed sample size less than 30
Ken Plummer
 
Ordinal (ties)
Ordinal (ties)Ordinal (ties)
Ordinal (ties)
Ken Plummer
 
Ordinal and nominal
Ordinal and nominalOrdinal and nominal
Ordinal and nominal
Ken Plummer
 
Relationship covariates
Relationship   covariatesRelationship   covariates
Relationship covariates
Ken Plummer
 
Relationship nature of data
Relationship nature of dataRelationship nature of data
Relationship nature of data
Ken Plummer
 
Number of variables (predictive)
Number of variables (predictive)Number of variables (predictive)
Number of variables (predictive)
Ken Plummer
 
Levels of the iv
Levels of the ivLevels of the iv
Levels of the iv
Ken Plummer
 
Independent variables (2)
Independent variables (2)Independent variables (2)
Independent variables (2)
Ken Plummer
 

More from Ken Plummer (20)

Diff rel gof-fit - jejit - practice (5)
Diff rel gof-fit - jejit - practice (5)Diff rel gof-fit - jejit - practice (5)
Diff rel gof-fit - jejit - practice (5)
 
Learn About Range - Copyright updated
Learn About Range - Copyright updatedLearn About Range - Copyright updated
Learn About Range - Copyright updated
 
Inferential vs descriptive tutorial of when to use - Copyright Updated
Inferential vs descriptive tutorial of when to use - Copyright UpdatedInferential vs descriptive tutorial of when to use - Copyright Updated
Inferential vs descriptive tutorial of when to use - Copyright Updated
 
Diff rel ind-fit practice - Copyright Updated
Diff rel ind-fit practice - Copyright UpdatedDiff rel ind-fit practice - Copyright Updated
Diff rel ind-fit practice - Copyright Updated
 
Normal or skewed distributions (inferential) - Copyright updated
Normal or skewed distributions (inferential) - Copyright updatedNormal or skewed distributions (inferential) - Copyright updated
Normal or skewed distributions (inferential) - Copyright updated
 
Normal or skewed distributions (descriptive both2) - Copyright updated
Normal or skewed distributions (descriptive both2) - Copyright updatedNormal or skewed distributions (descriptive both2) - Copyright updated
Normal or skewed distributions (descriptive both2) - Copyright updated
 
Nature of the data practice - Copyright updated
Nature of the data practice - Copyright updatedNature of the data practice - Copyright updated
Nature of the data practice - Copyright updated
 
Nature of the data (spread) - Copyright updated
Nature of the data (spread) - Copyright updatedNature of the data (spread) - Copyright updated
Nature of the data (spread) - Copyright updated
 
Mode practice 1 - Copyright updated
Mode practice 1 - Copyright updatedMode practice 1 - Copyright updated
Mode practice 1 - Copyright updated
 
Nature of the data (descriptive) - Copyright updated
Nature of the data (descriptive) - Copyright updatedNature of the data (descriptive) - Copyright updated
Nature of the data (descriptive) - Copyright updated
 
Dichotomous or scaled
Dichotomous or scaledDichotomous or scaled
Dichotomous or scaled
 
Skewed less than 30 (ties)
Skewed less than 30 (ties)Skewed less than 30 (ties)
Skewed less than 30 (ties)
 
Skewed sample size less than 30
Skewed sample size less than 30Skewed sample size less than 30
Skewed sample size less than 30
 
Ordinal (ties)
Ordinal (ties)Ordinal (ties)
Ordinal (ties)
 
Ordinal and nominal
Ordinal and nominalOrdinal and nominal
Ordinal and nominal
 
Relationship covariates
Relationship   covariatesRelationship   covariates
Relationship covariates
 
Relationship nature of data
Relationship nature of dataRelationship nature of data
Relationship nature of data
 
Number of variables (predictive)
Number of variables (predictive)Number of variables (predictive)
Number of variables (predictive)
 
Levels of the iv
Levels of the ivLevels of the iv
Levels of the iv
 
Independent variables (2)
Independent variables (2)Independent variables (2)
Independent variables (2)
 

Recently uploaded

BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
GeorgeMilliken2
 
How to deliver Powerpoint Presentations.pptx
How to deliver Powerpoint  Presentations.pptxHow to deliver Powerpoint  Presentations.pptx
How to deliver Powerpoint Presentations.pptx
HajraNaeem15
 
Nutrition Inc FY 2024, 4 - Hour Training
Nutrition Inc FY 2024, 4 - Hour TrainingNutrition Inc FY 2024, 4 - Hour Training
Nutrition Inc FY 2024, 4 - Hour Training
melliereed
 
HYPERTENSION - SLIDE SHARE PRESENTATION.
HYPERTENSION - SLIDE SHARE PRESENTATION.HYPERTENSION - SLIDE SHARE PRESENTATION.
HYPERTENSION - SLIDE SHARE PRESENTATION.
deepaannamalai16
 
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptxChapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
Denish Jangid
 
NEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 1 - REVISION POWERPOINT.pptx
NEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 1 - REVISION POWERPOINT.pptxNEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 1 - REVISION POWERPOINT.pptx
NEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 1 - REVISION POWERPOINT.pptx
iammrhaywood
 
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation results
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsTemple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation results
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation results
Krassimira Luka
 
The basics of sentences session 7pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 7pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 7pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 7pptx.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptxBeyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
EduSkills OECD
 
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
MysoreMuleSoftMeetup
 
Pharmaceutics Pharmaceuticals best of brub
Pharmaceutics Pharmaceuticals best of brubPharmaceutics Pharmaceuticals best of brub
Pharmaceutics Pharmaceuticals best of brub
danielkiash986
 
Bonku-Babus-Friend by Sathyajith Ray (9)
Bonku-Babus-Friend by Sathyajith Ray  (9)Bonku-Babus-Friend by Sathyajith Ray  (9)
Bonku-Babus-Friend by Sathyajith Ray (9)
nitinpv4ai
 
Oliver Asks for More by Charles Dickens (9)
Oliver Asks for More by Charles Dickens (9)Oliver Asks for More by Charles Dickens (9)
Oliver Asks for More by Charles Dickens (9)
nitinpv4ai
 
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two Hearts
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two HeartsA Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two Hearts
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two Hearts
Steve Thomason
 
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
imrankhan141184
 
CIS 4200-02 Group 1 Final Project Report (1).pdf
CIS 4200-02 Group 1 Final Project Report (1).pdfCIS 4200-02 Group 1 Final Project Report (1).pdf
CIS 4200-02 Group 1 Final Project Report (1).pdf
blueshagoo1
 
Benner "Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers"
Benner "Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers"Benner "Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers"
Benner "Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers"
National Information Standards Organization (NISO)
 
spot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skills
spot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skillsspot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skills
spot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skills
haiqairshad
 
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem studentsRHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
Himanshu Rai
 

Recently uploaded (20)

BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
 
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
 
How to deliver Powerpoint Presentations.pptx
How to deliver Powerpoint  Presentations.pptxHow to deliver Powerpoint  Presentations.pptx
How to deliver Powerpoint Presentations.pptx
 
Nutrition Inc FY 2024, 4 - Hour Training
Nutrition Inc FY 2024, 4 - Hour TrainingNutrition Inc FY 2024, 4 - Hour Training
Nutrition Inc FY 2024, 4 - Hour Training
 
HYPERTENSION - SLIDE SHARE PRESENTATION.
HYPERTENSION - SLIDE SHARE PRESENTATION.HYPERTENSION - SLIDE SHARE PRESENTATION.
HYPERTENSION - SLIDE SHARE PRESENTATION.
 
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptxChapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
 
NEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 1 - REVISION POWERPOINT.pptx
NEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 1 - REVISION POWERPOINT.pptxNEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 1 - REVISION POWERPOINT.pptx
NEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 1 - REVISION POWERPOINT.pptx
 
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation results
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsTemple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation results
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation results
 
The basics of sentences session 7pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 7pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 7pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 7pptx.pptx
 
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptxBeyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
 
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
 
Pharmaceutics Pharmaceuticals best of brub
Pharmaceutics Pharmaceuticals best of brubPharmaceutics Pharmaceuticals best of brub
Pharmaceutics Pharmaceuticals best of brub
 
Bonku-Babus-Friend by Sathyajith Ray (9)
Bonku-Babus-Friend by Sathyajith Ray  (9)Bonku-Babus-Friend by Sathyajith Ray  (9)
Bonku-Babus-Friend by Sathyajith Ray (9)
 
Oliver Asks for More by Charles Dickens (9)
Oliver Asks for More by Charles Dickens (9)Oliver Asks for More by Charles Dickens (9)
Oliver Asks for More by Charles Dickens (9)
 
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two Hearts
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two HeartsA Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two Hearts
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two Hearts
 
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
 
CIS 4200-02 Group 1 Final Project Report (1).pdf
CIS 4200-02 Group 1 Final Project Report (1).pdfCIS 4200-02 Group 1 Final Project Report (1).pdf
CIS 4200-02 Group 1 Final Project Report (1).pdf
 
Benner "Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers"
Benner "Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers"Benner "Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers"
Benner "Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers"
 
spot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skills
spot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skillsspot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skills
spot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skills
 
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem studentsRHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
 

What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?

  • 1. Repeated Measures (ANOVA) Conceptual Explanation
  • 2. How did you get here?
  • 3. How did you get here? So, you have decided to use a Repeated Measures ANOVA.
  • 4. How did you get here? So, you have decided to use a Repeated Measures ANOVA. Let’s consider the decisions you made to get here.
  • 5. First of all, you must have noticed the problem to be solved deals with generalizing from a smaller sample to a larger population.
  • 6. First of all, you must have noticed the problem to be solved deals with generalizing from a smaller sample to a larger population.
  • 7. First of all, you must have noticed the problem to be solved deals with generalizing from a smaller sample to a larger population. Sample of 30
  • 8. First of all, you must have noticed the problem to be solved deals with generalizing from a smaller sample to a larger population. Sample of 30
  • 9. First of all, you must have noticed the problem to be solved deals with generalizing from a smaller sample to a larger population. Large Population of 30,000 Sample of 30
  • 10. First of all, you must have noticed the problem to be solved deals with generalizing from a smaller sample to a larger population. Large Population of 30,000 Sample of 30 Therefore, you would determine that the problem deals with inferential not descriptive statistics.
  • 11. Therefore, you would determine that the problem deals with inferential not descriptive statistics.
  • 12. Therefore, you would determine that the problem deals with inferential not descriptive statistics. Double check your problem to see if that is the case
  • 13. Therefore, you would determine that the problem deals with inferential not descriptive statistics. Inferential Descriptive Double check your problem to see if that is the case
  • 14. You would have also noticed that the problem dealt with questions of difference not Relationships, Independence nor Goodness of Fit. Inferential Descriptive
  • 15. You would have also noticed that the problem dealt with questions of difference not Relationships, Independence nor Goodness of Fit. Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential Descriptive Difference
  • 16. You would have also noticed that the problem dealt with questions of difference not Relationships, Independence nor Goodness of Fit. Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential Descriptive Difference Relationship
  • 17. You would have also noticed that the problem dealt with questions of difference not Relationships, Independence nor Goodness of Fit. Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential Descriptive Difference Relationship Difference
  • 18. You would have also noticed that the problem dealt with questions of difference not Relationships, Independence nor Goodness of Fit. Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential Descriptive Difference Relationship Difference Goodness of Fit
  • 19. After checking the data, you noticed that the data was ratio/interval rather than extreme ordinal (1st, 2nd, 3rd place) or nominal (male, female) Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential Descriptive Difference Relationship Difference Goodness of Fit
  • 20. After checking the data, you noticed that the data was ratio/interval rather than extreme ordinal (1st, 2nd, 3rd place) or nominal (male, female) Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential Descriptive Difference Goodness of Fit Difference Relationship Ratio/Interval
  • 21. After checking the data, you noticed that the data was ratio/interval rather than extreme ordinal (1st, 2nd, 3rd place) or nominal (male, female) Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential Descriptive Difference Goodness of Fit Difference Relationship Ratio/Interval Ordinal
  • 22. After checking the data, you noticed that the data was ratio/interval rather than extreme ordinal (1st, 2nd, 3rd place) or nominal (male, female) Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential Descriptive Difference Goodness of Fit Difference Relationship Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal
  • 23. The distribution was more or less normal rather than skewed or kurtotic.
  • 24. The distribution was more or less normal rather than skewed or kurtotic.
  • 25. The distribution was more or less normal rather than skewed or kurtotic.
  • 26. The distribution was more or less normal rather than skewed or kurtotic.
  • 27. The distribution was more or less normal rather than skewed or kurtotic. Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential Descriptive Difference Goodness of Fit Skewed Difference Relationship Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal
  • 28. The distribution was more or less normal rather than skewed or kurtotic. Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential Descriptive Difference Goodness of Fit Difference Relationship Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal Skewed Kurtotic
  • 29. The distribution was more or less normal rather than skewed or kurtotic. Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential Descriptive Difference Goodness of Fit Difference Relationship Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal Skewed Kurtotic Normal
  • 30. Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist.
  • 31. Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. DV #1 Chemistry Test Scores
  • 32. Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. DV #1 DV #2 Chemistry Test Scores Class Attendance
  • 33. Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. DV #1 DV #2 DV #3 Chemistry Test Scores Class Attendance Homework Completed
  • 34. Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. Inferential Descriptive Difference Goodness of Fit Double check your problem to see if that is the case Difference Relationship Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal Skewed Kurtotic Normal
  • 35. Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. Descriptive Difference Goodness of Fit Difference Relationship Skewed Kurtotic Normal 1 DV Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal
  • 36. Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. Inferential Descriptive Difference Relationship Difference Goodness of Fit Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal Skewed Kurtotic Normal 1 DV 2+ DV Double check your problem to see if that is the case
  • 37. Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist.
  • 38. Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. IV #1 Use of Innovative eBook
  • 39. Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. IV #1 IV #2 Use of Innovative eBook Doing Homework to Classical Music
  • 40. Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. IV #1 IV #2 IV #3 Use of Innovative eBook Doing Homework to Classical Music Gender
  • 41. Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. IV #1 IV #2 IV #3 Use of Innovative eBook Doing Homework to Classical Music Gender
  • 42. Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist.
  • 43. Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. Descriptive Difference Goodness of Fit Inferential Difference Relationship Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal Skewed Kurtotic Normal 1 DV 2+ DV
  • 44. Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. Inferential Descriptive Difference Goodness of Fit Difference Relationship Skewed Kurtotic Normal 1 DV 2+ DV 1 IV Inferential Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal
  • 45. Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. Descriptive Difference Relationship Difference Difference Goodness of Fit Nominal Skewed Kurtotic Normal 1 DV 2+ DV 1 IV 2+ IV Inferential Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal
  • 46. Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. Descriptive Difference Relationship Difference Difference Goodness of Fit Skewed Kurtotic Normal 1 DV 2+ DV 1 IV 2+ IV Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal
  • 47. There are three levels of the Independent Variable (IV) rather than just two levels. Note – even though repeated measures ANOVA can analyze just two levels, this is generally analyzed using a paired sample t-test.
  • 48. There are three levels of the Independent Variable (DV) rather than just two levels. Note – even though repeated measures ANOVA can analyze just two levels, this is generally analyzed using a paired sample t-test. Level 1 Before using the innovative ebook
  • 49. There are three levels of the Independent Variable (DV) rather than just two levels. Note – even though repeated measures ANOVA can analyze just two levels, this is generally analyzed using a paired sample t-test. Level 1 Level 2 Before using the innovative ebook Using the innovative ebook for 2 months
  • 50. There are three levels of the Independent Variable (DV) rather than just two levels. Note – even though repeated measures ANOVA can analyze just two levels, this is generally analyzed using a paired sample t-test. Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Before using the innovative ebook Using the innovative ebook for 2 months Using the innovative ebook for 4 months
  • 51. Descriptive Goodness of Fit Difference Relationship Skewed Kurtotic Normal 1 DV 2+ DVs 2+ IVs Inferential Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal 1 IV 2 levels 3+ levels Difference
  • 52. The samples are repeated rather than independent. Notice that the same class (Chem 100 section 003) is repeatedly tested.
  • 53. The samples are repeated rather than independent. Notice that the same class (Chem 100 section 003) is repeatedly tested. Chem 100 Section 003 January Chem 100 Section 003 March Chem 100 Section 003 May Before using the innovative ebook Using the innovative ebook for 2 months Using the innovative ebook for 4 months
  • 54. Descriptive Goodness of Fit Difference Relationship Skewed Kurtotic Normal 1 DV 2+ DVs 2+ IVs Inferential Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal 1 IV 2 levels 3+ levels Difference Independent Repeated
  • 55. If this was the appropriate path for your problem then you have correctly selected Repeated-measures ANOVA to solve the problem you have been presented.
  • 57. Repeated Measures ANOVA – Another use of analysis of variance is to test whether a single group of people change over time.
  • 58. Repeated Measures ANOVA – Another use of analysis of variance is to test whether a single group of people change over time.
  • 59. In this case, the distributions that are compared to each other are not from different groups
  • 60. In this case, the distributions that are compared to each other are not from different groups versus Group 1 Group 2
  • 61. In this case, the distributions that are compared to each other are not from different groups versus Group 1 Group 2
  • 62. In this case, the distributions that are compared to each other are not from different groups versus Group 1 Group 2 But from different times.
  • 63. In this case, the distributions that are compared to each other are not from different groups versus Group 1 Group 2 But from different times. Group 1 Group 1: Two Months Later versus
  • 64. For example, an instructor might administer the same test three times throughout the semester to ascertain whether students are improving in their skills.
  • 65. For example, an instructor might administer the same test three times throughout the semester to ascertain whether students are improving in their skills. January February April Exam 1 Exam 2 Exam 3
  • 66. For example, an instructor might administer the same test three times throughout the semester to ascertain whether students are improving in their skills. Exam 1 Exam 2 January February Exam 3 April The overall F-ratio will reveal whether there are differences somewhere among three time periods.
  • 67. For example, an instructor might administer the same test three times throughout the semester to ascertain whether students are improving in their skills. Exam 1 Exam 2 January February Exam 3 April The overall F-ratio will reveal whether there are differences somewhere among three time periods.
  • 68. For example, an instructor might administer the same test three times throughout the semester to ascertain whether students are improving in their skills. Exam 1 Exam 2 Average Score January February Exam 3 April Average Score Average Score The overall F-ratio will reveal whether there are differences somewhere among three time periods.
  • 69. For example, an instructor might administer the same test three times throughout the semester to ascertain whether students are improving in their skills. Exam 1 Exam 2 Average Score January February Exam 3 April Average Score Average Score The overall F-ratio will reveal whether there are differences somewhere among three time periods.
  • 70. For example, an instructor might administer the same test three times throughout the semester to ascertain whether students are improving in their skills. Exam 1 Exam 2 Average Score January February Exam 3 April Average Score Average Score There is a difference but we don’t know where The overall F-ratio will reveal whether there are differences somewhere among three time periods.
  • 71. Post hoc tests will reveal exactly where the differences occurred.
  • 72. Post hoc tests will reveal exactly where the differences occurred. January February April Exam 1 Exam 2 Exam 3 Average Score 35 Average Score 38 Average Score 40
  • 73. Post hoc tests will reveal exactly where the differences occurred. January February April Exam 1 Exam 2 Exam 3 Average Score 35 Average Score 38 Average Score 40 There is a statistically significant difference only between Exam 1 and Exam 3
  • 74. In contrast, with the One-way analysis of Variance (ANOVA) we were attempting to determine if there was a statistical difference between 2 or more (generally 3 or more) groups.
  • 75. In contrast, with the One-way analysis of Variance (ANOVA) we were attempting to determine if there was a statistical difference between 2 or more (generally 3 or more) groups. In our One-way ANOVA example in another presentation we attempted to determine if there was any statistically significant difference in the amount of Pizza Slices consumed by three different player types (football, basketball, and soccer).
  • 76. The data would be set up thus:
  • 77. The data would be set up thus: Football Players Pizza Slices Consumed Basketball Players Pizza Slices Consumed Soccer Players Pizza Slices Consumed Ben 5 Cam 6 Dan 5 Bob 7 Colby 4 Denzel 8 Bud 8 Conner 8 Dilbert 8 Bubba 9 Custer 4 Don 1 Burt 10 Cyan 2 Dylan 2
  • 78. The data would be set up thus: Football Players Pizza Slices Consumed Basketball Players Pizza Slices Consumed Soccer Players Pizza Slices Consumed Ben 5 Cam 6 Dan 5 Bob 7 Colby 4 Denzel 8 Bud 8 Conner 8 Dilbert 8 Bubba 9 Custer 4 Don 1 Burt 10 Cyan 2 Dylan 2 Notice how the individuals in these groups are different (hence different names)
  • 79. The data would be set up thus: Football Players Pizza Slices Consumed Basketball Players Pizza Slices Consumed Soccer Players Pizza Slices Consumed Ben 5 Cam 6 Dan 5 Bob 7 Colby 4 Denzel 8 Bud 8 Conner 8 Dilbert 8 Bubba 9 Custer 4 Don 1 Burt 10 Cyan 2 Dylan 2 Notice how the individuals in these groups are different (hence different names)
  • 80. The data would be set up thus: Football Players Pizza Slices Consumed Basketball Players Pizza Slices Consumed Soccer Players Pizza Slices Consumed Ben 5 Ben 6 Ben 5 Bob 7 Bob 4 Bob 8 Bud 8 Bud 8 Bud 8 Bubba 9 Bubba 4 Bubba 1 Burt 10 Burt 2 Burt 2 Notice how the individuals in these groups are different (hence different names) A Repeated Measures ANOVA is different than a One-Way ANOVA in one simply way: Only one group of person or observations is being measured, but they are measured more than one time.
  • 81. The data would be set up thus: Football Players Pizza Slices Consumed Basketball Players Pizza Slices Consumed Soccer Players Pizza Slices Consumed Ben 5 Ben 6 Ben 5 Bob 7 Bob 4 Bob 8 Bud 8 Bud 8 Bud 8 Bubba 9 Bubba 4 Bubba 1 Burt 10 Burt 2 Burt 2 Notice how the individuals in these groups are different (hence different names) A Repeated Measures ANOVA is different than a One-Way ANOVA in one simply way: Only one group of persons or observations is being measured, but they are measured more than one time.
  • 82. Notice the different times football player pizza consumption is being measured. Football Players Pizza Slices Consumed Pizza Slices Consumed Pizza Slices Consumed Ben 5 Ben 6 Ben 5 Bob 7 Bob 4 Bob 8 Bud 8 Bud 8 Bud 8 Bubba 9 Bubba 4 Bubba 1 Burt 10 Burt 2 Burt 2
  • 83. Notice the different times football player pizza consumption is being measured. Football Players Pizza Slices Consumed Before the Season Pizza Slices Consumed During the Season Pizza Slices Consumed After the Season Ben 5 Ben 6 Ben 5 Bob 7 Bob 4 Bob 8 Bud 8 Bud 8 Bud 8 Bubba 9 Bubba 4 Bubba 1 Burt 10 Burt 2 Burt 2
  • 84. Since only one group is being measured 3 times, each time is dependent on the previous time. By dependent we mean there is a relationship.
  • 85. Since only one group is being measured 3 times, each time is dependent on the previous time. By dependent we mean there is a relationship. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 86. Since only one group is being measured 3 times, each time is dependent on the previous time. By dependent we mean there is a relationship. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 The relationship between the scores is that we are comparing the same person across multiple observations.
  • 87. So, Ben’s before-season and during-season and after-season scores have one important thing in common:
  • 88. So, Ben’s before-season and during-season and after-season scores have one important thing in common: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 89. So, Ben’s before-season and during-season and after-season scores have one important thing in common: THESE SCORES ALL BELONG TO BEN. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 90. So, Ben’s before-season and during-season and after-season scores have one important thing in common: THESE SCORES ALL BELONG TO BEN. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 They are subject to all the factors that are special to Ben when consuming pizza, including how much he likes or dislikes, the toppings that are available, the eating atmosphere, etc.
  • 91. What we want to find out is – how much the BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER season pizza consuming sessions differ.
  • 92. What we want to find out is – how much the BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER season pizza consuming sessions differ. But we have to find a way to eliminate the variability that is caused by individual differences that linger across all three eating sessions. Once again we are not interested in the things that make Ben, Ben while eating pizza (like he’s a picky eater). We are interested in the effect of where we are in the season (BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER on Pizza consumption.)
  • 93. What we want to find out is – how much the BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER season pizza consuming sessions differ. But we have to find a way to eliminate the variability that is caused by individual differences that linger across all three eating sessions. Once again we are not interested in the things that make Ben, Ben while eating pizza (like he’s a picky eater). We are interested in the effect of where we are in the season (BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER on Pizza consumption.)
  • 94. What we want to find out is – how much the BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER season pizza consuming sessions differ. But we have to find a way to eliminate the variability that is caused by individual differences that linger across all three eating sessions. Once again we are not interested in the things that make Ben, Ben while eating pizza (like he’s a picky eater). We are interested in the effect of where we are in the season (BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER on Pizza consumption.)
  • 95. That way we can focus just on the differences that are related to WHEN the pizza eating occurred.
  • 96. That way we can focus just on the differences that are related to WHEN the pizza eating occurred. After running a repeated-measures ANOVA, this is the output that we will get:
  • 97. That way we can focus just on the differences that are related to WHEN the pizza eating occurred. After running a repeated-measures ANOVA, this is the output that we will get: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 98. This output will help us determine if we reject the null hypothesis:
  • 99. This output will help us determine if we reject the null hypothesis: There is no significant difference in the amount of pizza consumed by football players before, during, and/or after the season.
  • 100. This output will help us determine if we reject the null hypothesis: There is no significant difference in the amount of pizza consumed by football players before, during, and/or after the season. Or accept the alternative hypothesis:
  • 101. This output will help us determine if we reject the null hypothesis: There is no significant difference in the amount of pizza consumed by football players before, during, and/or after the season. Or accept the alternative hypothesis: There is a significant difference in the amount of pizza consumed by football players before, during, and/or after the season.
  • 102. To do so, let’s focus on the value .008
  • 103. To do so, let’s focus on the value .008 Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 104. To do so, let’s focus on the value .008 Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 105. To do so, let’s focus on the value .008 Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 This means that if we were to reject the null hypothesis, the probability that we would be wrong is 8 times out of 1000. As you remember, if that were to happen, it would be called a Type 1 error.
  • 106. To do so, let’s focus on the value .008 Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 This means that if we were to reject the null hypothesis, the probability that we would be wrong is 8 times out of 1000. As you remember, if that were to happen, it would be called a Type 1 error.
  • 107. But it is so unlikely, that we would be willing to take that risk and hence reject the null hypothesis.
  • 108. But it is so unlikely, that we would be willing to take that risk and hence we reject the null hypothesis. There IS NO statistically significant difference between the number of slices of pizza consumed by football players before, during, or after the football season.
  • 109. But it is so unlikely, that we would be willing to take that risk and hence we reject the null hypothesis. There IS NO statistically significant difference between the number of slices of pizza consumed by football players before, during, or after the football season.
  • 110. And accept the alternative hypothesis:
  • 111. And accept the alternative hypothesis: There IS A statistically significant difference between the number of slices of pizza consumed by football players before, during, or after the football season.
  • 112. And accept the alternative hypothesis: There IS A statistically significant difference between the number of slices of pizza consumed by football players before, during, or after the football season.
  • 113. Now we do not know which of the three are significantly different from one another or if all three are different. We just know that a difference exists.
  • 114. Now we do not know which of the three are significantly different from one another or if all three are different. We just know that a difference exists. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 115. Now we do not know which of the three are significantly different from one another or if all three are different. We just know that a difference exists. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 116. Now we do not know which of the three are significantly different from one another or if all three are different. We just know that a difference exists. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Later, we can run what is called a “Post-hoc” test to determine where the difference lies.
  • 117. From this point on – we will delve into the actual calculations and formulas that produce a Repeated-measures ANOVA. If such detail is of interest or a necessity to know, please continue.
  • 118. How was a significance value of .008 calculated?
  • 119. How was a significance value of .008 calculated? Let’s begin with the calculation of the various sources of Sums of Squares
  • 120. How was a significance value of .008 calculated? Let’s begin with the calculation of the various sources of Sums of Squares Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 121. We do this so that we can explain what is causing the scores to vary or deviate.
  • 122. We do this so that we can explain what is causing the scores to vary or deviate. • Is it error?
  • 123. We do this so that we can explain what is causing the scores to vary or deviate. • Is it error? • Is it differences between times (before, during, and after)?
  • 124. We do this so that we can explain what is causing the scores to vary or deviate. • Is it error? • Is it differences between times (before, during, and after)? Remember, the full name for sum of squares is the sum of squared deviations about the mean. This will help us determine the amount of variation from each of the possible sources.
  • 125. Let’s begin by calculating the total sums of squares.
  • 126. Let’s begin by calculating the total sums of squares. 푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푋 )2
  • 127. Let’s begin by calculating the total sums of squares. 푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푋 )2
  • 128. Let’s begin by calculating the total sums of squares. 푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푋 )2 This means one pizza eating observation for person “I” (e.g., Ben) on time “j” (e.g., before)
  • 130. For example: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 131. For example: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 132. For example: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the OR Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 133. For example: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the OR Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 134. For example: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the OR Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 135. For example: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the OR Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 136. For example: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the OR Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 137. For example: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season ETC After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 139. 푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푿)2 This means the average of all of the observations
  • 140. 푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푿)2 This means the average of all of the observations This means one pizza eating observation for person “I” (e.g., Ben) on time “j” (e.g., before)
  • 141. 푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푿)2 This means the average of all of the observations Pizza Slices Consumed This means one pizza eating observation for person “I” (e.g., Ben) on time “j” (e.g., before) Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 142. 푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푿)2 This means the average of all of the observations Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Average of All Observations This means one pizza eating observation for person “I” (e.g., Ben) on time “j” (e.g., before)
  • 143. 푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푿)2 This means sum or add everything up
  • 144. 푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푿 )2 This means sum or add everything up This means the average of all of the observations
  • 145. 푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푿)2 This means sum or add everything up This means the average of all of the observations This means one pizza eating observation for person “I” (e.g., Ben) on time “j” (e.g., before)
  • 146. Let’s calculate total sums of squares with this data set:
  • 147. Let’s calculate total sums of squares with this data set: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 148. To do so we will rearrange the data like so:
  • 149. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt
  • 150. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Season Before Before Before Before Before During During During During During After After After After After
  • 151. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Season Before Before Before Before Before During During During During During After After After After After Slices of Pizza 5 7 8 9 10 4 5 7 8 7 4 5 6 4 6
  • 152. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Season Before Before Before Before Before During During During During During After After After After After Slices of Pizza 5 7 8 9 10 4 5 7 8 7 4 5 6 4 6
  • 153. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Season Before Before Before Before Before During During During During During After After After After After Slices of Pizza 5 7 8 9 10 4 5 7 8 7 4 5 6 4 6 푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푋 )2
  • 154. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Season Before Before Before Before Before During During During During During After After After After After Slices of Pizza 5 7 8 9 10 4 5 7 Each 8 7 observation 4 5 6 4 푆푆2 6 푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푋 )
  • 155. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. Here is how we compute the Grand Mean = Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Season Before Before Before Before Before During During During During During After After After After After Slices of Pizza 5 7 8 9 10 4 5 7 8 7 4 5 6 4 6
  • 156. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. Here is how we compute the Grand Mean = Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Season Before Before Before Before Before During During During During During After After After After After Slices of Pizza 5 7 8 9 10 4 5 7 8 7 4 5 6 4 6
  • 157. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. Here is how we compute the Grand Mean = Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Season Before Before Before Before Before During During During During During After After After After After Slices of Pizza 5 7 8 9 10 4 5 7 8 7 4 5 6 4 6 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 158. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. Here is how we compute the Grand Mean = Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Season Before Before Before Before Before During During During During During After After After After After Slices of Pizza 5 7 8 9 10 4 5 7 8 7 4 5 6 4 6 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Average of All Observations = 6.3
  • 159. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. 푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푋 )2 Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Season Before Before Before Before Before During During During During During After After After After After Slices of Pizza 5 7 8 9 10 4 5 7 8 7 4 5 6 4 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
  • 160. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Season Before Before Before Before Before During During During During During After After After After After Slices of Pizza 5 7 8 9 10 4 5 7 8 7 4 5 6 4 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푋 )2
  • 161. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. 푆푆푡표푡푎푙 = Σ(푋푖푗 − 푋 )2 Bob Bob Before During 7 5 - - Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Ben Before 5 - 6.3 Bob Before 7 - 6.3 Bud Before 8 - 6.3 Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 Burt Before 10 - 6.3 Ben During 4 - 6.3 Bob During 5 - 6.3 Bud During 7 - 6.3 Bubba During 8 - 6.3 Burt During 7 - 6.3 Ben After 4 - 6.3 Bob After 5 - 6.3 Bud After 6 - 6.3 Bubba After 4 - 6.3 Burt After 6 - 6.3
  • 162. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Season Before Before Before Before Before During During During During During After After After After After Slices of Pizza 5 7 8 9 10 4 5 7 8 7 4 5 6 4 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = Ben During 4 - 6.3 = Bob During 5 - 6.3 = Bud During 7 - 6.3 = Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = Burt During 7 - 6.3 = Ben After 4 - 6.3 = Bob After 5 - 6.3 = Bud After 6 - 6.3 = Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = Burt After 6 - 6.3 =
  • 163. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. Football Players Football Players Ben Bob Bud Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 Bubba Burt Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 Ben Bob Bud Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 Bubba Burt Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Season Slices Season of Pizza Before Before Before Before Before During During During During During After After After After After Slices of Pizza 5 7 8 9 10 4 5 7 8 7 4 5 6 4 6 Grand Mean - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Deviation Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = Ben During 4 - 6.3 = Bob During 5 - 6.3 = Bud During 7 - 6.3 = Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = Burt During 7 - 6.3 = Ben After 4 - 6.3 = Bob After 5 - 6.3 = Bud After 6 - 6.3 = Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = Burt After 6 - 6.3 = Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3
  • 164. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up.
  • 165. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 = 49.3 We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up.
  • 166. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: Football Players Season Slices of Then – Pizza Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 = 49.3
  • 167. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 = 49.3 Then – we place the total sums of squares result in the ANOVA table.
  • 168. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 = 49.3 Then – we place the total sums of squares result in the ANOVA table.
  • 169. Then – we place the total sums of squares result in the ANOVA table. Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 = 49.3
  • 170. Then – we place the total sums of squares result in the ANOVA table. Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 = 49.3 Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 171. We have now calculated the total sums of squares. This is a good starting point. Because now we want to know of that total sums of squares how many sums of squares are generated from the following sources:
  • 172. We have now calculated the total sums of squares. This is a good starting point. Because now we want to know of that total sums of squares how many sums of squares are generated from the following sources: • Between subjects (this is the variance we want to eliminate)
  • 173. We have now calculated the total sums of squares. This is a good starting point. Because now we want to know of that total sums of squares how many sums of squares are generated from the following sources: • Between subjects (this is the variance we want to eliminate) • Between Groups (this would be between BEFORE, DURING, AFTER)
  • 174. We have now calculated the total sums of squares. This is a good starting point. Because now we want to know of that total sums of squares how many sums of squares are generated from the following sources: • Between subjects (this is the variance we want to eliminate) • Between Groups (this would be between BEFORE, DURING, AFTER) • Error (the variance that we cannot explain with our design)
  • 175. With these sums of squares we will be able to compute our F ratio value and then statistical significance.
  • 176. With these sums of squares we will be able to compute our F ratio value and then statistical significance. Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 177. With these sums of squares we will be able to compute our F ratio value and then statistical significance. Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Let’s calculate the sums of squares between subjects.
  • 178. Remember if we were just computing a one way ANOVA the table would go from this:
  • 179. Remember if we were just computing a one way ANOVA the table would go from this: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 180. Remember if we were just computing a one way ANOVA the table would go from this: To this: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 181. Remember if we were just computing a one way ANOVA the table would go from this: To this: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 2.669 .078 Error 29.600 8 3.700 Total 49.333 14
  • 182. Remember if we were just computing a one way ANOVA the table would go from this: To this: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 2.669 .078 Error 29.600 8 3.700 Total 49.333 14
  • 183. All of that variability goes into the error or within groups sums of squares (29.600) which makes the F statistic smaller (from 9.548 to 2.669), the significance value no longer significant (.008 to .078).
  • 184. All of that variability goes into the error or within groups sums of squares (29.600) which makes the F statistic smaller (from 9.548 to 2.669), the significance value no longer significant (.008 to .078). But the difference in within groups variability is not a function of error, it is a function of Ben, Bob, Bud, Bubba, and Burt’s being different in terms of the amount of slices they eat regardless of when they eat!
  • 185. All of that variability goes into the error or within groups sums of squares (29.600) which makes the F statistic smaller (from 9.548 to 2.669), the significance value no longer significant (.008 to .078). But the difference in within groups variability is not a function of error, it is a function of Ben, Bob, Bud, Bubba, and Burt’s being different in terms of the amount of Pizza slices Slices Consumed they eat regardless Football Before the During the After the Average of when they eat! Players Season Season Season Ben 5 4 4 4.3 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 Burt 10 7 6 7.7
  • 186. Here is a data set where there are not between group differences, but there is a lot of difference based on when the group eats their pizza:
  • 187. Here is a data set where there are not between group differences, but there is a lot of difference based on when the group eats their pizza: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average Ben 1 5 9 5.0 Bob 2 5 8 5.0 Bud 3 5 7 5.0 Bubba 1 5 9 5.0 Burt 2 5 8 5.0
  • 188. Here is a data set where there are not between group differences, but there is a lot of difference based on when the group eats their pizza: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average Ben 1 5 9 5.0 Bob 2 5 8 5.0 Bud 3 5 7 5.0 Bubba 1 5 9 5.0 Burt 2 5 8 5.0 There is no variability between subjects (they are all 5.0).
  • 189. Look at the variability between groups:
  • 190. Look at the variability between groups: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average Ben 1 5 9 5.0 Bob 2 5 8 5.0 Bud 3 5 7 5.0 Bubba 1 5 9 5.0 Burt 2 5 8 5.0 1.8 5.0 8.2
  • 191. Look at the variability between groups: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average Ben 1 5 9 5.0 Bob 2 5 8 5.0 Bud 3 5 7 5.0 Bubba 1 5 9 5.0 Burt 2 5 8 5.0 1.8 5.0 8.2 They are very different from one another.
  • 192. Here is what the ANOVA table would look like:
  • 193. Here is what the ANOVA table would look like: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 0.000 4 Between Groups 102.400 2 51.200 73.143 .000 Error 5.600 8 0.700 Total 49.333 14
  • 194. Here is what the ANOVA table would look like: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 0.000 4 Between Groups 102.400 2 51.200 73.143 .000 Error 5.600 8 0.700 Total 49.333 14 Notice how there are no sum of squares values for the between subjects source of variability!
  • 195. Here is what the ANOVA table would look like: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 0.000 4 Between Groups 102.400 2 51.200 73.143 .000 Error 5.600 8 0.700 Total 49.333 14 Notice how there are no sum of squares values for the between subjects source of variability! But there is a lot of sum of squares values for the between groups.
  • 196. Here is what the ANOVA table would look like: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 0.000 4 Between Groups 102.400 2 51.200 73.143 .000 Error 5.600 8 0.700 Total 49.333 14 Notice how there are no sum of squares values for the between subjects source of variability! But there is a lot of sum of squares values for the between groups. Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 0.000 4 Between Groups 102.400 2 51.200 73.143 .000 Error 5.600 8 0.700 Total 49.333 14
  • 197. What would the data set look like if there was very little between groups (by season) variability and a great deal of between subjects variability:
  • 198. What would the data set look like if there was very little between groups (by season) variability and a great deal of between subjects variability: Here it is:
  • 199. What would the data set look like if there was very little between groups (by season) variability and a great deal of between subjects variability: Here it is: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average Ben 3 3 3 3.0 Bob 5 5 5 5.0 Bud 7 7 7 7.0 Bubba 8 8 8 8.0 Burt 12 12 13 12.3 Between Subjects
  • 200. In this case the between subjects (Ben, Bob, Bud . . .), are very different.
  • 201. In this case the between subjects (Ben, Bob, Bud . . .), are very different. When you see between SUBJECTS averages that far away, you know that the sums of squares for between groups will be very large.
  • 202. In this case the between subjects (Ben, Bob, Bud . . .), are very different. When you see between SUBJECTS averages that far away, you know that the sums of squares for between groups will be very large. Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 148.267 4 Between Groups 0.133 2 0.067 1.000 .689 Error 0.533 8 0.067 Total 148.933 14
  • 203. Notice, in contrast, as we compute the between group (seasons) average how close they are.
  • 204. Notice, in contrast, as we compute the between group (seasons) average how close they are. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average Ben 3 3 3 3.0 Bob 5 5 5 5.0 Bud 7 7 7 7.0 Bubba 8 8 8 8.0 Burt 12 12 13 12.3 7.0 7.0 7.2
  • 205. Notice, in contrast, as we compute the between group (seasons) average how close they are. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average Ben 3 3 3 3.0 Bob 5 5 5 5.0 Bud 7 7 7 7.0 Bubba 8 8 8 8.0 Burt 12 12 13 12.3 7.0 7.0 7.2 Between Groups
  • 206. Notice, in contrast, as we compute the between group (seasons) average how close they are. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average Ben 3 3 3 3.0 Bob 5 5 5 5.0 Bud 7 7 7 7.0 Bubba 8 8 8 8.0 Burt 12 12 13 12.3 7.0 7.0 7.2 Between Groups
  • 207. When you see between group averages this close you know that the sums of squares for between groups will be very small.
  • 208. When you see between group averages this close you know that the sums of squares for between groups will be very small. Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 148.267 4 Between Groups 0.133 2 0.067 1.000 .689 Error 0.533 8 0.067 Total 148.933 14
  • 209. When you see between group averages this close you know that the sums of squares for between groups will be very small. Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 148.267 4 Between Groups 0.133 2 0.067 1.000 .689 Error 0.533 8 0.067 Total 148.933 14 Now that we have conceptually considered the sources of variability as described by the sum of squares, let’s begin calculating between subjects, between groups, and the error sources.
  • 210. We will begin with calculating Between Subjects sum of squares.
  • 211. We will begin with calculating Between Subjects sum of squares. To do so, let’s return to our original data set:
  • 212. We will begin with calculating Between Subjects sum of squares. To do so, let’s return to our original data set: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 213. We will begin with calculating Between Subjects sum of squares. To do so, let’s return to our original data set: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Here is the formula for calculating SS between subjects.
  • 214. We will begin with calculating Between Subjects sum of squares. To do so, let’s return to our original data set: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Here is the formula for calculating SS between subjects. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푋푏푠 − 푋 )2
  • 215. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2
  • 216. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average Ben 5 4 4 4.3 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 Burt 10 7 6 7.7
  • 217. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 This means the average of between Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average subjects Ben 5 4 4 4.3 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 Burt 10 7 6 7.7
  • 218. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average minus Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - Burt 10 7 6 7.7 -
  • 219. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 This means the average of all of the observations
  • 220. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 Here is how we calculate the grand mean again:
  • 221. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Average of All Observations = 6.3
  • 222. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: Now we subtract each subject or person average from the Grand Mean.
  • 223. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: Now we subtract each subject or person average from the Grand Mean. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average minus Grand Mean Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 This means the average of all of the observations
  • 224. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: Now we subtract each subject or person average from the Grand Mean. This gives us the person’s average score deviation from the total or grand mean.
  • 225. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: Now we subtract each subject or person average from the Grand Mean. This gives us the person’s average score deviation from the total or grand mean. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average minus Grand Mean Deviation Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4
  • 226. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: Now we subtract each subject or person average from the Grand Mean. This gives us the person’s average score deviation from the total or grand mean. Now we will square the deviations.
  • 227. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: Now we subtract each subject or person average from the Grand Mean. This gives us the person’s average score deviation from the total or grand mean. Now we will square the deviations.
  • 228. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: Now we subtract each subject or person average from the Grand Mean. This gives us the person’s average score deviation Pizza Slices from Consumed the total or grand mean. Football Before During the After the Average minus Grand Deviation Squared Players the Season Season Mean Now Season we will square the deviations Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9
  • 229. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: Now we subtract each subject or person average from the Grand Mean. This gives us the person’s average score deviation from the total or grand mean. Now we will square the deviations. Then we sum all of these squared deviations.
  • 230. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: Now we subtract each subject or person average from the Grand Mean. This gives us the person’s average score deviation from the total or grand mean. Now we will square the deviations. Then we sum all of these squared deviations.
  • 231. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: Now we subtract each subject or person average from the Grand Mean. This gives Pizza Slices us Consumed the person’s average score deviation Football Before During from the After the the Average minus Grand Deviation Squared Players the Season Season total or Mean grand mean. Season Now Ben we 5 will 4 square 4 4.3 the - deviations. 6.3 -2.0 3.9 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 Then Bud we 8 sum 7 all 6 of these 7.0 - 6.3 squared 0.7 deviations. 0.5 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 7.1 Sum up
  • 232. Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: Now we subtract each subject or person average from the Grand Mean. This gives us the person’s average score deviation from the total or grand mean. Now we will square the deviations. Then we sum all of these squared deviations. Finally, we multiply the sum all of these squared deviations by the number of groups:
  • 233. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average minus Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 7.1 Times 3 groups Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3
  • 234. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average minus Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 Number of conditions Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 7.1 Times 3 groups Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3
  • 235. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average minus Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 7.1 Times 3 groups Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3
  • 236. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average minus Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 7.1 Times 3 groups Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3
  • 237. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average minus Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 7.1 Times 3 groups Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3 1 2 3
  • 238. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average minus Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 7.1 Times 3 groups Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3 1 2 3
  • 239. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df After the Season Average minus Grand Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Mean Deviation Squared Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 7.1 Times 3 groups Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3 1 2 3
  • 240. 푆푆푏푒푡푤푒푒푛 푠푢푏푗푒푐푡푠 = 푘 ∗ Σ(푿풃풔 − 푋 )2 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average minus Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 7.1 Times 3 groups Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3 1 2 3 Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 241. Now it is time to compute the between groups (seasons) sum of squares.
  • 242. Now it is time to compute the between groups’ (seasons) sum of squares. Here is the equation we will use to compute it:
  • 243. Now it is time to compute the between groups’ (seasons) sum of squares. Here is the equation we will use to compute it: 푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 )
  • 244. Let’s break this down with our data set:
  • 245. Let’s break this down with our data set: 푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 )
  • 246. Let’s break this down with our data set: 푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 ) Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 247. We begin by computing the mean of each condition (k) 푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 ) Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 248. We begin by computing the mean of each condition (k) 푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 ) Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean
  • 249. We begin by computing the mean of each condition (k) 푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 ) Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8
  • 250. We begin by computing the mean of each condition (k) 푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 ) Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 6.2
  • 251. We begin by computing the mean of each condition (k) 푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 ) Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 6.2 5.0
  • 252. Then subtract each condition mean from the grand mean. 푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 ) Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 6.2 5.0
  • 253. Then subtract each condition mean from the grand mean. 푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 ) Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 6.2 5.0 minus - - -
  • 254. Then subtract each condition mean from the grand mean. 푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 ) Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 6.2 5.0 minus - - - Grand Mean 6.3 6.3 6.3
  • 255. Then subtract each condition mean from the grand mean. 푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 ) Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 6.2 5.0 minus - - - Grand Mean 6.3 6.3 6.3 equals Deviation 1.5 -0.1 -1.3
  • 256. Square the deviation. 푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 )ퟐ Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 6.2 5.0 minus - - - Grand Mean 6.3 6.3 6.3 equals Deviation 1.5 -0.1 -1.3 Squared Deviation 2.2 0.0 1.8
  • 257. Sum the Squared Deviations:
  • 258. Sum the Squared Deviations: 푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 )ퟐ
  • 259. Sum the Squared Deviations: 푛 ∗ Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 )ퟐ Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 6.2 5.0 minus - - - Grand Mean 6.3 6.3 6.3 equals Deviation 1.5 -0.1 -1.3 Squared Deviation 2.2 0.0 1.8 Sum
  • 260. Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Sum the Squared Deviations: Bob 7 5 푛 ∗ 5 Σ(푋 푘 − 푋 )ퟐ Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 6.2 5.0 minus - - - Grand Mean 6.3 6.3 6.3 equals Deviation 1.5 -0.1 -1.3 Squared Deviation 2.2 0.0 1.8 Sum 3.95 Sum of Squared Deviations
  • 261. Multiply by the number of observations per condition (number of pizza eating slices across before, during, and after).
  • 262. Multiply by the number of observations per condition (number of pizza eating slices across before, during, and after). 3.95 Sum of Squared Deviations
  • 263. Multiply by the number of observations per condition (number of pizza eating slices across before, during, and after). 3.95 Sum of Squared Deviations
  • 264. Multiply by the number of observations per condition (number of pizza eating slices across before, during, and after). 3.95 Sum of Squared Deviations 5 Number of observations
  • 265. Multiply by the number of observations per condition (number of pizza eating slices across before, during, and after). 3.95 Sum of Squared Deviations 5 Number of observations
  • 266. Multiply by the number of observations per condition (number of pizza eating slices across before, during, and after). 3.95 Sum of Squared Deviations 5 Number of observations 19.7 Weighted Sum of Squared Deviations
  • 267. Let’s return to the ANOVA table and put the weighted sum of squared deviations.
  • 268. Let’s return to the ANOVA table and put the weighted sum of squared deviations. Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 269. Let’s return to the ANOVA table and put the weighted sum of squared deviations. Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 3.95 Sum of Squared Deviations 5 Number of observations 19.7 Weighted Sum of Squared Deviations
  • 270. Let’s return to the ANOVA table and put the weighted sum of squared deviations. Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 3.95 Sum of Squared Deviations 5 Number of observations 19.7 Weighted Sum of Squared Deviations
  • 271. So far we have calculated Total Sum of Squares along with Sum of Squares for Between Subjects, and Between Groups.
  • 272. So far we have calculated Total Sum of Squares along with Sum of Squares along with Sum of Squares for Between Subjects, Between Groups. Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 273. Now we will calculate the sum of squares associated with Error.
  • 274. Now we will calculate the sum of squares associated with Error. Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 275. To do this we simply add the between subjects and between groups sums of squares.
  • 276. To do this we simply add the between subjects and between groups sums of squares. Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 277. To do this we simply add the between subjects and between groups sums of squares. Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 21.333 Between Subjects Sum of Squares 19.733 Between Groups Sum of Squares 41.600 Between Subjects & Groups Sum of Squares Combined
  • 278. Then we subtract the Between Subjects & Group Sum of Squares Combined (41.600) from the Total Sum of Squares (49.333)
  • 279. Then we subtract the Between Subjects & Group Sum of Squares Combined (41.600) from the Total Sum of Squares (49.333) 49.333 Total Sum of Squares 41.600 Between Subjects & Groups Sum of Squares Combined 8.267 Sum of Squares Attributed to Error or Unexplained
  • 280. Then we subtract the Between Subjects & Group Sum of Squares Combined (41.600) from the Total Sum of Squares (49.333) 49.333 Total Sum of Squares 41.600 Between Subjects & Groups Sum of Squares Combined 8.267 Sum of Squares Attributed to Error or Unexplained Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 281. Now we have all of the information necessary to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between pizza slices consumed by football players between three different eating occasions (before, during or after the season).
  • 282. Now we have all of the information necessary to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between pizza slices consumed by football players between three different eating occasions (before, during or after the season). Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 283. To calculate the significance level
  • 284. To calculate the significance level Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 285. We must calculate the F ratio
  • 286. We must calculate the F ratio Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 287. Which is calculated by dividing the Between Groups Mean Square value (9.867) by the Error Mean Square value (1.033).
  • 288. Which is calculated by dividing the Between Groups Mean Square value (9.867) by the Error Mean Square value (1.033). Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 = 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 289. Which is calculated by dividing the sum of squares between groups by its degrees of freedom, as shown below:
  • 290. Which is calculated by dividing the sum of squares between groups by its degrees of freedom, as shown below: Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 = 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 291. Which is calculated by dividing the sum of squares between groups by its degrees of freedom, as shown below: And Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 = 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 292. Which is calculated by dividing the sum of squares between groups by its degrees of freedom, as shown below: = And Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 = 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 293. Which is calculated by dividing the sum of squares between groups by its degrees of freedom, as shown below: Type III Sum of Squares df Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 = 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 And Source Mean Square F Sig. Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 = 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Now we need to figure out how we calculate degrees of freedom for each source of sums of squares.
  • 294. Let’s begin with determining the degrees of freedom Between Subjects.
  • 295. Let’s begin with determining the degrees of freedom Between Subjects.
  • 296. Let’s begin with determining the degrees of freedom Between Subjects. Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 297. Let’s begin with determining the degrees of freedom Between Subjects. Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 We take the number of subjects which, in this case, is 5 – 1 = 4
  • 298. Let’s begin with determining the degrees of freedom Between Subjects. Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 We take the number of subjects which, in this case, is 5 – 1 = 4
  • 299. Let’s begin with determining the degrees of freedom Between Subjects. Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 We take the number of subjects which, in this case, is 5 – 1 = 4 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average Ben 3 3 3 3.0 Bob 5 5 5 5.0 Bud 7 7 7 7.0 Bubba 8 8 8 8.0 Burt 12 12 13 12.3 Between Subjects 1 2 3 4 5
  • 300. Now – onto Between Groups Degrees of Freedom (df)
  • 301. Now – onto Between Groups Degrees of Freedom (df) Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 302. Now – onto Between Groups Degrees of Freedom (df) Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 We take the number of groups which in this case is 3 – 1 = 2
  • 303. Now – onto Between Groups Degrees of Freedom (df) Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 We take the number of groups which in this case is 3 – 1 = 2
  • 304. Now – onto Between Groups Degrees of Freedom (df) Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 We take the number of groups which in this case is 3 – 1 = 2 1 2 3 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 305. Now – onto Between Groups Degrees of Freedom (df) Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 We take the number of groups which in this case is 3 – 1 = 2 1 2 3 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 306. The error degrees of freedom are calculated by multiplying the between subjects by the between groups degrees of freedom.
  • 307. The error degrees of freedom are calculated by multiplying the between subjects by the between groups degrees of freedom. 4 Between Subjects Degrees of Freedom 2 Between Groups Degrees of Freedom 8 Error Degrees of Freedom
  • 308. The error degrees of freedom are calculated by multiplying the between subjects by the between groups degrees of freedom. 4 Between Subjects Degrees of Freedom 2 Between Groups Degrees of Freedom 8 Error Degrees of Freedom Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 309. The error degrees of freedom are calculated by multiplying the between subjects by the between groups degrees of freedom. 4 Between Subjects Degrees of Freedom 2 Between Groups Degrees of Freedom 8 Error Degrees of Freedom Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 310. The degrees of freedom for total sum of squares is calculated by adding all of the degrees of freedom from the other three sources.
  • 311. The degrees of freedom for total sum of squares is calculated by adding all of the degrees of freedom from the other three sources. 4 2 8 14
  • 312. The degrees of freedom for total sum of squares is calculated by adding all of the degrees of freedom from the other three sources. 4 2 8 14 Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 313. The degrees of freedom for total sum of squares is calculated by adding all of the degrees of freedom from the other three sources. 4 2 8 14 Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 314. We will compute the Mean Square values for just the Between Groups and Error. We are not interested in what is happening with Between Subjects. We calculated the Between Subjects sum of squares only take out any differences that are a function of differences that would exist regardless of what group we were looking at.
  • 315. Once again, if we had not pulled out Between Subjects sums of squares, then the Between Subjects would be absorbed in the error value:
  • 316. Once again, if we had not pulled out Between Subjects sums of squares, then the Between Subjects would be absorbed in the error value: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 317. Once again, if we had not pulled out Between Subjects sums of squares, then the Between Subjects would be absorbed in the error value: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047 Within Groups 29.600 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 318. Once again, if we had not pulled out Between Subjects sums of squares, then the Between Subjects would be absorbed in the error value: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047 Within Groups 29.600 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 319. Once again, if we had not pulled out Between Subjects sums of squares, then the Between Subjects would be absorbed in the error value: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047 Within Groups 29.600 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Within Groups is another way of saying Error
  • 320. And that would have created a larger error mean square value:
  • 321. And that would have created a larger error mean square value: Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047 Error 29.600 12 2.467 Total 49.333 14
  • 322. And that would have created a larger error mean square value: Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047 Error 29.600 12 2.467 Total 49.333 14
  • 323. Which in turn would have created a smaller F value:
  • 324. Which in turn would have created a smaller F value: Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047 Error 29.600 12 2.467 Total 49.333 14
  • 325. Which in turn would have created a smaller F value: Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df = Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 = 4.000 .047 Error 29.600 12 2.467 Total 49.333 14
  • 326. Which in turn would have created a larger significance value:
  • 327. Which in turn would have created a larger significance value: Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047 Error 29.600 12 2.467 Total 49.333 14

Editor's Notes

  1. change
  2. Begin here