1) ANOVA is used to compare the means of more than two populations and determine if observed differences are due to chance or actual differences in the population means.
2) The document provides an example of using a one-way single factor ANOVA to analyze the effects of different teaching formats on student exam scores.
3) The ANOVA compares the between-treatment variability to the within-treatment variability using an F-test. If the between-treatment variability is significantly larger, it suggests the population means differ. In this example, the F-test showed no significant difference between the teaching formats.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) everything you need to knowStat Analytica
Most of the students may struggle with the analysis of variance (ANOVA). Here in this presentation you can clear all your doubts in analysis of variance with suitable examples.
This presentation contains information about Mann Whitney U test, what is it, when to use it and how to use it. I have also put an example so that it may help you to easily understand it.
Parametric vs Nonparametric Tests: When to use whichGönenç Dalgıç
There are several statistical tests which can be categorized as parametric and nonparametric. This presentation will help the readers to identify which type of tests can be appropriate regarding particular data features.
this session differentiates between univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analysis. it covers practical assessment of table of critical values and understanding of the degree of freedom
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) everything you need to knowStat Analytica
Most of the students may struggle with the analysis of variance (ANOVA). Here in this presentation you can clear all your doubts in analysis of variance with suitable examples.
This presentation contains information about Mann Whitney U test, what is it, when to use it and how to use it. I have also put an example so that it may help you to easily understand it.
Parametric vs Nonparametric Tests: When to use whichGönenç Dalgıç
There are several statistical tests which can be categorized as parametric and nonparametric. This presentation will help the readers to identify which type of tests can be appropriate regarding particular data features.
this session differentiates between univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analysis. it covers practical assessment of table of critical values and understanding of the degree of freedom
ANOVA à 1 facteur, Analyse de variance, (One-way ANOVA)Adad Med Chérif
Dans ce tutoriel, il s’agit de montrer comment peut-on procéder à l’analyse ANOVA à 1 facteur entre des échantillons indépendants par le biais du logiciel SPSS et quels sont les résultats à mettre sur le rapport final ?
How to conduct a literature review: A literature review on knowledge manageme...Roberto Cerchione
Guidelines for writing a literature review applied to the topic of Knowledge Management in SMEs.
This paper provides a systematic review of the literature on knowledge management (KM) in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and SME networks. The main objective is to highlight the state-of-the-art of KM from the management point of view in order to identify relevant research gaps. The review highlights that in recent years the trend of papers on the topic is growing and involves a variety of approaches, methodologies and models from different research areas. The vast majority of papers analysed focus on the topic of KM in the SME while there are only few papers analysing KM in networks populated by SMEs. The content analysis of the papers highlights six areas of investigation from which were derived ten research questions concerning three perspectives: the factors affecting KM; the impact of KM on firm’s performance; the knowledge management systems.
to cite this paper: Cerchione, R., Esposito, E., Spadaro, M.R. A literature review on knowledge management in SMEs (2016) Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 14 (2), pp. 169-177.
to link to this paper: doi:10.1057/kmrp.2015.12
Statistical inference: Statistical Power, ANOVA, and Post Hoc testsEugene Yan Ziyou
This deck was used in the IDA facilitation of the John Hopkins' Data Science Specialization course for Statistical Inference. It covers the topics in week 4 (statistical power, ANOVA, and post hoc tests).
The data and R script for the lab session can be found here: https://github.com/eugeneyan/Statistical-Inference
At the end of this lecture, the students should be able to
1.Understand structure of research study appropriate for ANOVA test
2.Understand how to evaluate the assumptions underlying this test
3. interpret SPSS outputs and report the results
a full lecture presentation on ANOVA .
areas covered include;
a. definition and purpose of anova
b. one-way anova
c. factorial anova
d. mutiple anova
e MANOVA
f. POST-HOC TESTS - types
f. easy step by step process of calculating post hoc test.
(Individuals With Disabilities Act Transformation Over the Years)DSilvaGraf83
(Individuals With Disabilities Act Transformation Over the Years)
Discussion Forum Instructions:
1. You must post at least three times each week.
2. Your initial post is due Tuesday of each week and the following two post are due before Sunday.
3. All post must be on separate days of the week.
4. Post must be at least 150 words and cite all of your references even it its the book.
Discussion Topic:
Describe how the lives of students with disabilities from culturally and/or linguistically diverse backgrounds have changed since the advent of IDEA. What do you feel are some things that can or should be implemented to better assist with students that have disabilities? Tell me about these ideas and how would you integrate them?
ANOVA
ANOVA
• Analysis of Variance
• Statistical method to analyzes variances to determine if the means from more than
two populations are the same
• compare the between-sample-variation to the within-sample-variation
• If the between-sample-variation is sufficiently large compared to the within-sample-
variation it is likely that the population means are statistically different
• Compares means (group differences) among levels of factors. No
assumptions are made regarding how the factors are related
• Residual related assumptions are the same as with simple regression
• Explanatory variables can be qualitative or quantitative but are categorized
for group investigations. These variables are often referred to as factors
with levels (category levels)
ANOVA Assumptions
• Assume populations , from which the response values for the groups
are drawn, are normally distributed
• Assumes populations have equal variances
• Can compare the ratio of smallest and largest sample standard deviations.
Between .05 and 2 are typically not considered evidence of a violation
assumption
• Assumes the response data are independent
• For large sample sizes, or for factor level sample sizes that are equal,
the ANOVA test is robust to assumption violations of normality and
unequal variances
ANOVA and Variance
Fixed or Random Factors
• A factor is fixed if its levels are chosen before the ANOVA investigation
begins
• Difference in groups are only investigated for the specific pre-selected factors
and levels
• A factor is random if its levels are choosen randomly from the
population before the ANOVA investigation begins
Randomization
• Assigning subjects to treatment groups or treatments to subjects
randomly reduces the chance of bias selecting results
ANOVA hypotheses statements
One-way ANOVA
One-Way ANOVA
Hypotheses statements
Test statistic
=
𝐵𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑝 𝑉𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒
𝑊𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑝 𝑉𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒
Under the null hypothesis both the between and within group variances estimate the
variance of the random error so the ratio is assumed to be close to 1.
Null Hypothesis
Alternate Hypothesis
One-Way ANOVA
One-Way ANOVA
One-Way ANOVA Excel Output
Treatme
(Individuals With Disabilities Act Transformation Over the Years)DMoseStaton39
(Individuals With Disabilities Act Transformation Over the Years)
Discussion Forum Instructions:
1. You must post at least three times each week.
2. Your initial post is due Tuesday of each week and the following two post are due before Sunday.
3. All post must be on separate days of the week.
4. Post must be at least 150 words and cite all of your references even it its the book.
Discussion Topic:
Describe how the lives of students with disabilities from culturally and/or linguistically diverse backgrounds have changed since the advent of IDEA. What do you feel are some things that can or should be implemented to better assist with students that have disabilities? Tell me about these ideas and how would you integrate them?
ANOVA
ANOVA
• Analysis of Variance
• Statistical method to analyzes variances to determine if the means from more than
two populations are the same
• compare the between-sample-variation to the within-sample-variation
• If the between-sample-variation is sufficiently large compared to the within-sample-
variation it is likely that the population means are statistically different
• Compares means (group differences) among levels of factors. No
assumptions are made regarding how the factors are related
• Residual related assumptions are the same as with simple regression
• Explanatory variables can be qualitative or quantitative but are categorized
for group investigations. These variables are often referred to as factors
with levels (category levels)
ANOVA Assumptions
• Assume populations , from which the response values for the groups
are drawn, are normally distributed
• Assumes populations have equal variances
• Can compare the ratio of smallest and largest sample standard deviations.
Between .05 and 2 are typically not considered evidence of a violation
assumption
• Assumes the response data are independent
• For large sample sizes, or for factor level sample sizes that are equal,
the ANOVA test is robust to assumption violations of normality and
unequal variances
ANOVA and Variance
Fixed or Random Factors
• A factor is fixed if its levels are chosen before the ANOVA investigation
begins
• Difference in groups are only investigated for the specific pre-selected factors
and levels
• A factor is random if its levels are choosen randomly from the
population before the ANOVA investigation begins
Randomization
• Assigning subjects to treatment groups or treatments to subjects
randomly reduces the chance of bias selecting results
ANOVA hypotheses statements
One-way ANOVA
One-Way ANOVA
Hypotheses statements
Test statistic
=
𝐵𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑝 𝑉𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒
𝑊𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑝 𝑉𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒
Under the null hypothesis both the between and within group variances estimate the
variance of the random error so the ratio is assumed to be close to 1.
Null Hypothesis
Alternate Hypothesis
One-Way ANOVA
One-Way ANOVA
One-Way ANOVA Excel Output
Treatme
Inferential Analysis
Chapter 20
NUR 6812Nursing Research
Florida National University
Introduction - Inferential Analysis
We will discuss analysis of variance and regression, which are technically part of the same family of statistics known as the general linear method but are used to achieve different analytical goals
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) is used so often that Iversen and Norpoth (1987) said they once had a student who thought this was the name of an Italian statistician.
You can think of analysis of variance as a whole family of procedures beginning with the simple and frequently used t-test and becoming quite complicated with the use of multiple dependent variables (MANOVA, to be explained later in this chapter) and covariates.
Although the simpler varieties of these statistics can actually be calculated by hand, it is assumed that you will use a statistical software package for your calculations.
If you want to see how these calculations are done, you could try to compute a correlation, chi-square, t-test, or ANOVA yourself (see Yuker, 1958; Field, 2009), but in general it is too time consuming and too subject to human error to do these by hand.
IMPORTANT TERMINOLOGY
Several terms are used in these analyses that you need to be familiar with to understand the analyses themselves and the results. Many will already be familiar to you.
Statistical significance: This indicates the probability that the differences found are a result of error, not the treatment. Stated in terms of the P value, the convention is to accept either a 1% (P ≤ 0.01), or 1 out of 100, or 5% (P ≤ 0.05), or 5 out of 100, possibility that any differences seen could have been due to error (Cortina & Dunlap, 2007).
Research hypothesis: A research hypothesis is a declarative statement of the expected relationship between the dependent and independent variable(s).
Null hypothesis: The null hypothesis, based on the research hypothesis, states that the predicted relationships will not be found or that those found could have occurred by chance, meaning the difference will not be statistically significant.
Effect size: This is defined by Cortina and Dunlap as “the amount of variance in one variable accounted for by another in the sample at hand” (2007, p. 231). Effect size estimates are helpful adjuncts to significance testing. An important limitation, however, is that they are heavily influenced by the type of treatment or manipulation that occurred and the measures that are used.
Confidence intervals: Although sometimes suggested as an adjunct or replacement for the significance level, confidence intervals are determined in part by the alpha (significance level) (Cortina & Dunlap, 2007). Likened to a margin of error, the confidence intervals indicate the range within which the true difference between means may lie. A narrow confidence interval implies high precision; we can specify believable values within a narrow range ...
Inferential Analysis
Chapter 20
NUR 6812Nursing Research
Florida National University
Introduction - Inferential Analysis
We will discuss analysis of variance and regression, which are technically part of the same family of statistics known as the general linear method but are used to achieve different analytical goals
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) is used so often that Iversen and Norpoth (1987) said they once had a student who thought this was the name of an Italian statistician.
You can think of analysis of variance as a whole family of procedures beginning with the simple and frequently used t-test and becoming quite complicated with the use of multiple dependent variables (MANOVA, to be explained later in this chapter) and covariates.
Although the simpler varieties of these statistics can actually be calculated by hand, it is assumed that you will use a statistical software package for your calculations.
If you want to see how these calculations are done, you could try to compute a correlation, chi-square, t-test, or ANOVA yourself (see Yuker, 1958; Field, 2009), but in general it is too time consuming and too subject to human error to do these by hand.
IMPORTANT TERMINOLOGY
Several terms are used in these analyses that you need to be familiar with to understand the analyses themselves and the results. Many will already be familiar to you.
Statistical significance: This indicates the probability that the differences found are a result of error, not the treatment. Stated in terms of the P value, the convention is to accept either a 1% (P ≤ 0.01), or 1 out of 100, or 5% (P ≤ 0.05), or 5 out of 100, possibility that any differences seen could have been due to error (Cortina & Dunlap, 2007).
Research hypothesis: A research hypothesis is a declarative statement of the expected relationship between the dependent and independent variable(s).
Null hypothesis: The null hypothesis, based on the research hypothesis, states that the predicted relationships will not be found or that those found could have occurred by chance, meaning the difference will not be statistically significant.
Effect size: This is defined by Cortina and Dunlap as “the amount of variance in one variable accounted for by another in the sample at hand” (2007, p. 231). Effect size estimates are helpful adjuncts to significance testing. An important limitation, however, is that they are heavily influenced by the type of treatment or manipulation that occurred and the measures that are used.
Confidence intervals: Although sometimes suggested as an adjunct or replacement for the significance level, confidence intervals are determined in part by the alpha (significance level) (Cortina & Dunlap, 2007). Likened to a margin of error, the confidence intervals indicate the range within which the true difference between means may lie. A narrow confidence interval implies high precision; we can specify believable values within a narrow range ...
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
1. ANOVA
One way Single Factor Models
KARAN DESAI-11BIE001
DHRUV PATEL-11BIE024
VISHAL DERASHRI -11BIE030
HARDIK MEHTA-11BIE037
MALAV BHATT-11BIE056
2. DEFINITION
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) is a collection of
statistical models used to analyze the differences
between group means and their associated procedures
(such as "variation" among and between groups),
developed by R.A.Fisher .In the ANOVA setting, the
observed variance in a particular variable is partitioned
into components attributable to different sources of
variation
2
3. -Sir Ronald
Aylmer Fisher
FRS was an English statistician,
evolutionary biologist, geneticist, and
3
4. Why ANOVA
• Compare the mean of more than two
population?
• Compare populations each containing
several subgroups or levels?
4
5. Problem with multiple T test
• One problem with this approach is the increasing
number of tests as the number of groups
increases
• The probability of making a Type I error increases
as the number of tests increase.
• If the probability of a Type I error for the analysis
is set at 0.05 and 10 t-tests are done, the overall
probability of a Type I error for the set of tests = 1
– (0.95)10 = 0.40* instead of 0.05
5
6. In its simplest form, ANOVA provides a statistical test of
whether or not the means of several groups are equal,
and therefore generalizes the t-test to more than two
groups. As doing multiple two-sample t-tests would result
in an increased chance of committing a statistical type-I
error, ANOVAs are useful in comparing (testing) three or
more means (groups or variables) for statistical
significance.
6
7. • Another way to describe the multiple comparisons
problem is to think about the meaning of an alpha
level = 0.05
• Alpha of 0.05 implies that, by chance, there will be
one Type I error in every 20 tests: 1/20 = 0.05.
• This means that, by chance the null hypothesis
will be incorrectly rejected once in every 20 tests
• As the number of tests increases, the probability
of finding a ‘significant’ result by chance increases.
7
8. Importance of ANOVA
• The ANOVA is an important test because
it enables us to see for example how
effective two different types of treatment
are and how durable they are.
• Effectively a ANOVA can tell us how well a
treatment work, how long it lasts and how
budget friendly it will be an
8
9. CLASSIFICATION OF ANOVA
MODEL
1. Fixed-effects models:
The fixed-effects model of analysis of
variance applies to situations in which the experimenter
applies one or more treatments to the subjects of the
experiment to see if the response variable values
change. This allows the experimenter to estimate the
ranges of response variable values that the treatment
would generate in the population as a whole.
9
10. 2. Random-effects model:
Random effects models are used
when the treatments are not fixed. This occurs when the
various factor levels are sampled from a larger
population. Because the levels themselves are random
variables , some assumptions and the method of
contrasting the treatments (a multi-variable
generalization of simple differences) differ from the fixed-effects
model.
10
11. 3.Mixed-effects models
A mixed-effects model contains experimental
factors of both fixed and random-effects types, with appropriately
different interpretations and analysis for the two types.
Example: Teaching experiments could be performed by a
university department to find a good introductory textbook, with
each text considered a treatment. The fixed-effects model would
compare a list of candidate texts. The random-effects model
would determine whether important differences exist among a
list of randomly selected texts. The mixed-effects model would
compare the (fixed) incumbent texts to randomly selected
alternatives.
11
12. ASSUMPTION
Normal distribution
Variances of dependent variable are equal in all
populations
Random samples; independent scores
12
14. ONE-WAY ANOVA
One factor (manipulated variable)
One response variable
Two or more groups to compare
14
15. USEFULLNESS
Similar to t-test
More versatile than t-test
Compare one parameter (response variable)
between two or more groups
15
16. Remember that…
Standard deviation (s)
n
s = √[(Σ (xi – X)2)/(n-1)]
i = 1
In this case: Degrees of freedom (df)
df = Number of observations or groups
16
17. ANOVA
ANOVA (ANalysis Of VAriance) is a natural extension used to
compare the means more than 2 populations.
Basic Question: Even if the true means of n populations were
equal (i.e. m1 = m2 = m3 = m4) we cannot expect the sample
means (x1, x2, x3, x4 ) to be equal. So when we get
different values for the x’s,
How much is due to randomness?
How much is due to the fact that we are sampling from
different populations with possibly different mj’s.
18. ANOVA TERMINOLOGY
Response Variable (y)
What we are measuring
Experimental Units
The individual unit that we will measure
Factors
Independent variables whose values can change to affect
the outcome of the response variable, y
Levels of Factors
Values of the factors
Treatments
The combination of the levels of the factors applied to an
experimental unit
19. Example
We want to know how combinations of different
amounts of water (1 ac-ft, 3 ac-ft, 5 ac-ft) and
different fertilizers (A, B, C) affect crop yields
Response variable
– crop yield (bushels/acre)
Experimental unit
Each acre that receives a treatment
Factors (2)
Water and fertilizer
Levels (3 for Water; 3 for Fertilizer)
Water: 1, 3, 5; Fertilizer: A, B, C
Treatments (9 = 3x3)
1A, 3A, 5A, 1B, 3B, 5B, 1C, 3C, 5C
20. Total Treatments
Fertilizer
A B C
1 AC-FT Treatment 1 Treatment 2 Treatment 3
Water 3 AC-FT Treatment 4 Treatment 5 Treatment 6
5 AC-FT Treatment 7 Treatment 8 Treatment 9
21. Single Factor ANOVA
Basic Assumptions
If we focus on only one factor (e.g. fertilizer type in the
previous example), this is called single factor ANOVA.
In this case, levels and treatments are the same thing since
there are no combinations between factors.
Assumptions for Single Factor ANOVA
1. The distribution of each population in the comparison has a
normal distribution
2. The standard deviations of each population (although
unknown) are assumed to be equal (i.e. s1 = s2 = s3 = s4)
3. Sampling is:
Random
Independent
22. Example
The university would like to know if the delivery mode of the
introductory statistics class affects the performance in the
class as measured by the scores on the final exam.
The class is given in four different formats:
Lecture
Text Reading
Videotape
Internet
The final exam scores from random samples of students from
each of the four teaching formats was recorded.
24. Summary
There is a single factor under observation – teaching format
There are k = 4 different treatments (or levels of teaching
formats)
The number of observations (experimental units) are n1 = 7,
n2 = 8, n3 = 6, n4 = 5 total number of
observations, n = 26
Treatment Means : x1 = 76, x2 = 65, x3 = 75, x4 =
74
Grand mean (of all 26 observations) : x =
72
25. Why aren’t all thex’s the same?
There is variability due to the different treatments --
Between Treatment Variability (Treatment)
There is variability due to randomness within each
treatment -- Within Treatment Variability (Error)
BASIC CONCEPT
If the average Between Treatment Variability is “large”
compared to the average Within Treatment Variability,
we can reasonably conclude that there really are
differences among the population means (i.e. at least
one μj differs from the others).
26. Basic Questions
Given this basic concept, the natural questions are:
What is “variability” due to treatment and due to error
and how are they measured?
What is “average variability” due to treatment and due
to error and how are they measured?
What is “large”?
How much larger than the observed average
variability due to error does the observed average
variability due to treatment have to be before we
are convinced that there are differences in the true
population means (the μ’s)?
27. How Is “Total” Variability
Measured?
Variability is defined as the Sum of Square Deviations (from the
grand mean). So,
SST (Total Sum of Squares)
Sum of Squared Deviations of all observations from the
grand mean. (McClave uses SSTotal)
SSTr (Between Treatment Sum of Squares)
Sum of Square Deviations Due to Different Treatments.
(McClave uses SST)
SSE (Within Treatment Sum of Squares)
Sum of Square Deviations Due to Error
SST = SSTr + SSE
28. How is “Average” Variability Measured?
“Average” Variability is measured in:
Mean Square Values (MSTr and MSE)
Found by dividing SSTr and SSE by their
respective degrees of freedom
ANOVA TABLE
# treatments -1 DFT - DFTR
Variability SS DF Mean Square (MS)
Between Tr. (Treatment) SSTr k-1 SSTr/DFTR
Within Tr. (Error) SSE n-k SSE/DFE
TOTAL SST n-1
# observations -1
29. Formula for Calculating
SST
Calculating SST
Just like the
numerator of the
variance
assuming all (26)
entries come
from one
population
=
SST (x x)
ij
2 2
2
82 72) ... (81 72) 4394
= =
30. Formula for Calculating
SSTr
Calculating SSTr
Between Treatment
Variability
Replace all entries within
each treatment by its
mean – now all the
variability is between (not
within) treatments
76
76
76
76
76
76
76
=
SSTr n (x x)
2
j j
75
75
75
75
75
75
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
2 2 2 2
= =
7(76 72) 8(65 72) 6(75 72) 5(74 72) 578
74
74
74
74
74
31. Formula for Calculating
SSE
Calculating SSE (Within Treatment Variability)
The difference between the SST and SSTr ---
SSE SST - SSTr
= =
4394 - 578 =
3816
32. Can we Conclude a Difference Among
the 4 Teaching Formats?
We conclude that at least one population mean differs
from the others if the average between treatment
variability is large compared to the average within
treatment variability, that is if MSTr/MSE is “large”.
The ratio of the two measures of variability for these
normally distributed random variables has an F
distribution and the F-statistic (=MSTr/MSE) is
compared to a critical F-value from an F distribution
with:
Numerator degrees of freedom = DFTr
Denominator degrees of freedom = DFE
If the ratio of MSTr to MSE (the F-statistic) exceeds
the critical F-value, we can conclude that at least one
population mean differs from the others.
33. Can We Conclude Different Teaching
Formats Affect Final Exam Scores?
The F-test
H0: m1 = m2 = m3 = m4
HA: At least one mj differs from the others
Select α = .05.
Reject H0 (Accept HA) if:
F = α,DFTr,DFE = .05,3,22 =
F F 3.05
MSTr
MSE
34. Hand Calculations for the F-test
173.45
578
= = =
3816
22
SSTr
SSE
DFE
MSE
192.67
3
DFTr
MSTr
= = =
1.11
192.67
= =
173.45
1.11 3.05
F
Cannot conclude there is a difference among the μj’s
37. REVIEW
ANOVA Situation and Terminology
Response variable, Experimental Units, Factors,
Levels, Treatments, Error
Basic Concept
If the “average variability” between treatments is “a
lot” greater than the “average variability” due to error –
conclude that at least one mean differs from the
others.
Single Factor Analysis
By Hand
By Excel