REASONING
Leticia Pelayo
Reasoning
•The process of
 creating or
 generating
 conclusions from
 evidence or premises.
Deductive Reasoning
                      • The process of reasoning from
                        general statements to a certain
                        and logical conclusion related to
                        the conclusion.
                      • There are three parts to deductive
                        reasoning:
                        • Major Premise – general
                          statement
                        • Minor Premise – statement of a
                          specific instance related to the
                          major premise
                        • Conclusion – statement derived
                          from the minor premises
                          relationship to the major premise.
Inductive Reasoning
• The process of reasoning
  from specifics to a general
  conclusion related to those
  specifics
• Inductive reasoning allows
  humans to create
  generalizations about
  people, events, and things in
  their environment.
Inductive Reasoning
                      • There are five ways of
                        inductive reasoning
                        • Example Reasoning
                        • Causal Reasoning
                        • Sign Reasoning
                        • Comparison Reasoning
                        • Reasoning from authority
Example Reasoning
• Uses specific instances as a
  basis for making a valid
  conclusion.
  • For example, I have taken
    four good teachers at this
    college; therefore, all
    teachers at this college are
    good.
Causal Reasoning
                   • It is based on the idea that
                     for every action there is a
                     reaction.
                   • There are two forms of
                     causal reasoning:
                     • Cause to effect
                     • Effects to cause
Casual Reasoning
• Cause to effect – a known cause or
  causes is capable of producing
  some unknown effect or effects.
• Effect to cause – some known
  effect(s) has/have been produced
  by some unknown cause, or
  causes.
• For example, the professors at this
  college are good because they all
  have at least a Master’s Degree in
  their teaching field.
Sign Reasoning
                 • It involves inferring a
                   connection between two
                   related things, so that
                   presence or absence of one
                   indicates the presence or
                   absence of the other.
                 • For example, football on
                   television is a sign that Fall
                   has arrived.
Comparison Reasoning
• It involves drawing comparisons
  between two similar things, and
  concluding that, because of the
  similarities involved, what is
  correct about one is also correct of
  the other.
• It is also known as reasoning by
  analogy.
• There are two types of comparison
  reasoning:
  • Figurative Comparison
  • Literal Comparison
Comparison Reasoning
                   • Figurative Comparison – the
                     attempt to link similarities
                     between two cases from different
                     classifications.
                   • Literal Comparison – the attempt
                     to establish a link between similar
                     classifications.
                     • For example, people to people,
                       cars to cars, and states to states.
Reasoning From Authority
• It is used when a person argues
  that a particular claim is justified
  because it is held or advocated by
  a credible source.
• You can use this type of argument
  in two ways.
  • You can ask that an argument be
    accepted simply because someone
    you consider an authority
    advocates it.
  • You can support your arguments
    with the credibility of another
    person.
Fallacy
          • Is an error in reasoning.
          • An “argument” in which the
            premises given for the
            conclusion do not provide
            the needed degree of
            support.

Reasoning

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Reasoning •The process of creating or generating conclusions from evidence or premises.
  • 3.
    Deductive Reasoning • The process of reasoning from general statements to a certain and logical conclusion related to the conclusion. • There are three parts to deductive reasoning: • Major Premise – general statement • Minor Premise – statement of a specific instance related to the major premise • Conclusion – statement derived from the minor premises relationship to the major premise.
  • 4.
    Inductive Reasoning • Theprocess of reasoning from specifics to a general conclusion related to those specifics • Inductive reasoning allows humans to create generalizations about people, events, and things in their environment.
  • 5.
    Inductive Reasoning • There are five ways of inductive reasoning • Example Reasoning • Causal Reasoning • Sign Reasoning • Comparison Reasoning • Reasoning from authority
  • 6.
    Example Reasoning • Usesspecific instances as a basis for making a valid conclusion. • For example, I have taken four good teachers at this college; therefore, all teachers at this college are good.
  • 7.
    Causal Reasoning • It is based on the idea that for every action there is a reaction. • There are two forms of causal reasoning: • Cause to effect • Effects to cause
  • 8.
    Casual Reasoning • Causeto effect – a known cause or causes is capable of producing some unknown effect or effects. • Effect to cause – some known effect(s) has/have been produced by some unknown cause, or causes. • For example, the professors at this college are good because they all have at least a Master’s Degree in their teaching field.
  • 9.
    Sign Reasoning • It involves inferring a connection between two related things, so that presence or absence of one indicates the presence or absence of the other. • For example, football on television is a sign that Fall has arrived.
  • 10.
    Comparison Reasoning • Itinvolves drawing comparisons between two similar things, and concluding that, because of the similarities involved, what is correct about one is also correct of the other. • It is also known as reasoning by analogy. • There are two types of comparison reasoning: • Figurative Comparison • Literal Comparison
  • 11.
    Comparison Reasoning • Figurative Comparison – the attempt to link similarities between two cases from different classifications. • Literal Comparison – the attempt to establish a link between similar classifications. • For example, people to people, cars to cars, and states to states.
  • 12.
    Reasoning From Authority •It is used when a person argues that a particular claim is justified because it is held or advocated by a credible source. • You can use this type of argument in two ways. • You can ask that an argument be accepted simply because someone you consider an authority advocates it. • You can support your arguments with the credibility of another person.
  • 13.
    Fallacy • Is an error in reasoning. • An “argument” in which the premises given for the conclusion do not provide the needed degree of support.