Things to do in the Digital Afterlife when you're deaddanbuzzo
Things to do in the Digital Afterlife when you're dead:
Presentation at International Symposium of Electronic Art, Istanbul 2011:
There are currently few procedures or public awareness about what happens to online digital identities after death. This paper discusses what happens with personal electronic information after death and looks to what is argued to be the rapidly approaching digital Afterlife. This afterlife of new emergent behaviour offers a challenge of almost unimaginable scope to the creative vision of Artists, Philosophers, Technologists and Cultural thinkers.
[TOP 3 TECH UPDATES MEXICO]
Creando Aplicaciones Web en el 2015:
Nuevas tendencias, desafíos, y mejores prácticas
Empujado por la revolución mobile, el emergente mundo de Internet Of Things, la web a evolucionado hacia una gran y ubícua plataforma de desarrollo de aplicaciones. Sin embargo, esta evolución posee dos caras: la de posicionar a la web como una plataforma tecnológica capaz de desbancar tecnologías como Flash y Silverlight, y de competir con iOS, o Android; y la de una plataforma inmadura, difícil de aprender, y de utilizar para crear experiencias de usuario de calidad.
En esta charla se dará una introducción a las nuevas tendencias en el desarrollo web, sus dificultades y desafíos, y las lecciones aprendidas obtenidas trabajando con estas tecnologías de punta.
Speaker: Fernando Curra
Things to do in the Digital Afterlife when you're deaddanbuzzo
Things to do in the Digital Afterlife when you're dead:
Presentation at International Symposium of Electronic Art, Istanbul 2011:
There are currently few procedures or public awareness about what happens to online digital identities after death. This paper discusses what happens with personal electronic information after death and looks to what is argued to be the rapidly approaching digital Afterlife. This afterlife of new emergent behaviour offers a challenge of almost unimaginable scope to the creative vision of Artists, Philosophers, Technologists and Cultural thinkers.
[TOP 3 TECH UPDATES MEXICO]
Creando Aplicaciones Web en el 2015:
Nuevas tendencias, desafíos, y mejores prácticas
Empujado por la revolución mobile, el emergente mundo de Internet Of Things, la web a evolucionado hacia una gran y ubícua plataforma de desarrollo de aplicaciones. Sin embargo, esta evolución posee dos caras: la de posicionar a la web como una plataforma tecnológica capaz de desbancar tecnologías como Flash y Silverlight, y de competir con iOS, o Android; y la de una plataforma inmadura, difícil de aprender, y de utilizar para crear experiencias de usuario de calidad.
En esta charla se dará una introducción a las nuevas tendencias en el desarrollo web, sus dificultades y desafíos, y las lecciones aprendidas obtenidas trabajando con estas tecnologías de punta.
Speaker: Fernando Curra
Big Data & The Future of Making Things by Mike HaleyGlobant
Globant and the California College of the Arts (CCA) got together to present CON.VERGE, their first conference for business executives and thought-leaders.
Mike is an energetic technical leader; he concentrates on making software a true partner in the design process. His team is focused on geometric shape analysis and large scale machine learning techniques for 3D design information.
In his talk, he explored 'What Things Are', 'What They Relate To' and 'What They Do' when it comes to data and how you can make things happen with the help of data. Check out his presentation for more details.
CreativeMornings/Pittsburgh Challenge: Education
My approach to this challenge was to make an empathetic appeal to the better part of ourselves. This talk is meant to interrupt the old narratives and try to replace them with the new stories that unite us. As a community, we can begin using our creative energies to design learning ecosystems that build connections that will allow us to see the world differently and more beautifully.
Peace and love,
Michelle
http://creativemornings.com/talks/michelle-king
Email Marketing, a copy of the presentation delivered by Matt Horsup, Itineris from the CIM Peterborough, Digital Marketing Boot Camp held on 25th May 2011 at Perkins Innovation Centre
Presentatie "Succesvol online ondernemen" van Alex van Ginneken van MediaCT. Gepresenteerd tijdens het eerste Sterc Seminar op 25 november 2011.
Meer over dit seminar vindt u op: http://www.sterc.nl/weblog/
Big Data & The Future of Making Things by Mike HaleyGlobant
Globant and the California College of the Arts (CCA) got together to present CON.VERGE, their first conference for business executives and thought-leaders.
Mike is an energetic technical leader; he concentrates on making software a true partner in the design process. His team is focused on geometric shape analysis and large scale machine learning techniques for 3D design information.
In his talk, he explored 'What Things Are', 'What They Relate To' and 'What They Do' when it comes to data and how you can make things happen with the help of data. Check out his presentation for more details.
CreativeMornings/Pittsburgh Challenge: Education
My approach to this challenge was to make an empathetic appeal to the better part of ourselves. This talk is meant to interrupt the old narratives and try to replace them with the new stories that unite us. As a community, we can begin using our creative energies to design learning ecosystems that build connections that will allow us to see the world differently and more beautifully.
Peace and love,
Michelle
http://creativemornings.com/talks/michelle-king
Email Marketing, a copy of the presentation delivered by Matt Horsup, Itineris from the CIM Peterborough, Digital Marketing Boot Camp held on 25th May 2011 at Perkins Innovation Centre
Presentatie "Succesvol online ondernemen" van Alex van Ginneken van MediaCT. Gepresenteerd tijdens het eerste Sterc Seminar op 25 november 2011.
Meer over dit seminar vindt u op: http://www.sterc.nl/weblog/
The following text material and terms defined at the end comprise .docxarnoldmeredith47041
The following text material and terms defined at the end comprise part of what will be asked on the Mid-Term Exam for PHIL 1381.
Logic [excerpt from Stan Baronett, Logic, 2E]
Logic is the study of reasoning. Logic investigates the level of correctness of the reasoning found in arguments. An argument is a group of statements of which one (the conclusion) is claimed to follow from the others (the premises). A statement is a sentence that is either true or false. Every statement is either true or false; these two possibilities are called “truth values.” Premises are statements that contain information intended to provide support or reasons to believe a conclusion. The conclusion is the statement that is claimed to follow from the premises. In order to help recognize arguments, we rely on premise indicator words and phrases, and conclusion indicator words and phrases.
Inference is the term used by logicians to refer to the reasoning process that is expressed by an argument. If a passage expresses a reasoning process—that the conclusion follows from the premises—then we say that it makes an inferential claim. If a passage does not express a reasoning process (explicit or implicit), then it does not make an inferential claim (it is a noninferential passage). One type of noninferential passage is the explanation. An explanation provides reasons for why or how an event occurred. By themselves, explanations are not arguments; however, they can form part of an argument.
There are two types of argument: deductive and inductive. A deductive argument is one in which it is claimed that the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises. In other words, it is claimed that under the assumption that the premises are true it is impossible for the conclusion to be false. An inductive argument is one in which it is claimed that the premises make the conclusion probable. In other words, it is claimed that, under the assumption that the premises are true, it is improbable for the conclusion to be false.
Revealing the logical form of a deductive argument helps with logical analysis and evaluation. When we evaluate deductive arguments, we use the following concepts: valid, invalid, sound, and unsound. A valid argument is one where, assuming the premises are true, it is impossible for the conclusion to be false. In other words, the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises. An invalid argument is one where, assuming the premises are true, it is possible for the conclusion to be false. In other words, a deductive argument in which the conclusion does not follow necessarily from the premises is an invalid argument. When logical analysis shows that a deductive argument is valid, and when truth value analysis of the premises shows that they are all true, then the argument is sound. If a deductive argument is invalid, or if at least one of the premises is false (truth value analysis), then the argument is unsound.
A counterexample to astatement is evidenc.
Free Essays from 123 Help Me | Inductive reasoning can be quickly summarized as a method through which a conclusion is drawn from particular cases; this.... For instance, it is certain that the sun will rise tomorrow in the morning simply because it has been observed that it rises every morning. This is an example .... 2023. febr. 15. ... According to Holland (1989), inductive reasoning entails taking certain examples and using the examples to develop a general principle. It .... Unlike in a deductive essay, inductive texts explore the topic without arguing for the correctness of the hypothesis. Here you will provide evidence first .... An inductive essay presents a conclusion drawn from the collective value of its premises. ... Induction and deduction are opposite forms of reasoning. Deduction .... 2015. jan. 1. ... Inductive reasoning is the procedure of reasoning in which we take a particular fact towards common conclusion, but it does not give guarantee .... 2022. jan. 12. ... Inductive reasoning is also called inductive logic or bottom-up reasoning. Note Inductive reasoning is often confused with deductive reasoning.. There are 2 types of reasoning; deductive and inductive reasoning. Deductive and inductive reasoning are based on logical arguments. A deductive argument is .... An example of inductive reasoning can be seen in this set of statements: Today, I left for work at eight o'clock and I arrived on time. Therefore, every day .... Inductive reasoning can often be hidden inside a deductive argument. That is, a generalization reached through inductive reasoning can be turned around and used ...
what is inductive and deductive reasoningSolutionDeductive and.pdfoptokunal1
what is inductive and deductive reasoning
Solution
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Deductive and inductive are basically types of arguments and where argument generally supports
conclusion with premises.
Deductive reasoning is basically a type of argument which supports conclusion logically for
example arguments which are based on rules, facts, truth, laws and principles and are accepted
widely.
It is the process of reasoning which involves to draw conclusion based on the relationship of two
premises in which one assertion is broad(major premises and valid) and other is specific(minor
premises and invalid). As major premises are broad it is to be supported by values and laws.
Like for instance:
Reena is a woman
All women are mortal
Therefore it proves that reena is mortal.
It is a top to down approach.
Inductive Reasoning is basically a type of argument which supports conclusion on the basis of
judgment, pattern, trend, experience and observation. These arguments do not prove truth as
these conclusions are based on probable support. The argument which support successfully is a
strong argument whereas that fails to support is considered as weak. It is a bottom to up
approach..
1. Reasoning “When an argument includes both quality evidence and a valid reasoning foundation, the argument is considered to be sound” By: Eric Melara
7. Inductive reasoningCausal reasoning For every action there is a reaction Two forms of causal reasoning: Cause to effect: cause capable of producing some unknown effect Effect to cause: some known effect has been produced by some unknown cause
8. Inductive reasoningSign reasoning A connection between two related things The presence of an attribute indicating that something else exists.
9. Inductive reasoningComparison reasoning Drawing comparisons between two similar things and concluding that, what is correct about one is also correct about the other.
11. Deductive reasoning Reasoning from general statements to a logically certain conclusion A deductive argument has three parts: a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion.
13. Deductive reasoningMinor premise A statement of a specific instance related to the major premise “I AM TAKING AN ONLINE CLASS AND IT HAS BEEN HARDER THAN SOME OTHER CLASSES I HAVE HAD”
14. Deductive reasoningConclusion The statement derived from the minor premises relationship to the major premise “MY ONLINE CLASS IS NOT EASIER THAN MY OTHER CLASSES”