Inductive reasoning
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
1 like•2,958 views
This document discusses inductive reasoning and its use of specific observations to derive general claims or conclusions. It outlines six types of inductive reasoning: generalization, analogy, sign, causation, authority, and parallel case. An example is provided for each type. Inductive reasoning is contrasted with deductive reasoning, which moves from general premises to specific conclusions. The document aims to help the reader identify, analyze, and evaluate different forms of inductive arguments.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Inductive reasoning powerpoint
The document discusses inductive reasoning, which involves arriving at a conclusion based on observations and facts without direct proof. It defines strong and weak inductions, providing examples of each. Strong inductions are more likely to be true while weak inductions can be proven false. Inductive reasoning is used in everyday conversations, scientific theories, and mathematics by making educated guesses based on available evidence and observations.
Inductive vs deductive reasoning
The document discusses the differences between deductive and inductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning starts with a general premise that is known to be true and uses logic to draw a specific conclusion. Inductive reasoning uses specific observations to draw a general conclusion that is probable but not certain. Examples are provided of arguments that use deductive or inductive logic.
Inductive reasoning
Inductive reasoning refers to drawing conclusions based on patterns or trends in observed data points rather than relying on a comprehensive set of facts. It involves making generalizations starting from specific individual cases. While inductive arguments can vary in strength based on how well the premises support the conclusion, induction alone does not constitute a valid proof because the conclusion may not apply to all cases, even if it has been observed to apply in many specific examples. The document provides examples of inductive reasoning arguments regarding characteristics that could be assumed about individuals based on common patterns or trends observed in their professions or activities.
Introduction to inductive and deductive reasoning
The document provides an introduction to inductive and deductive reasoning. It explains that inductive reasoning uses specific examples to derive a probable conclusion about all cases, while deductive reasoning applies a general principle to a specific instance to logically conclude. Several examples of inductive and deductive arguments are given to illustrate the concepts.
Chapter 4 logical reasoning
This document discusses different types of logical reasoning that can be used to develop theories: deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, and retroduction (abductive) reasoning. It provides examples of deductive and inductive arguments and their components. Several nursing theories developed using different logical reasoning approaches are also listed, including theories by Nightingale, Roy, Johnson, Neuman, and others. The document encourages the reader to choose a nursing theory and explain the logical form used by its theorist.
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
Inductive reasoning involves making hypotheses based on observations and working from general statements to conclusions, which are probabilistic. Deductive reasoning starts with known facts and works from general principles to specific conclusions, deriving logical certainties. The key difference is that inductive reasoning goes from specific to general, while deductive reasoning goes from general to specific.
Deductive And Inductive Reasoning
Deductive reasoning involves drawing a logically certain conclusion from general statements or premises, while inductive reasoning involves drawing a probable conclusion based on specific observations or facts. Inductive reasoning is used to make causal inferences or reason by analogy, but the conclusions are not logically certain. Both deductive and inductive reasoning involve areas of the brain associated with working memory and reasoning such as the prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia.
1.4 Validity, Truth, Soundness, Strength, Cogency
Course lecture I developed over section 1.4 of Patrick Hurley\'s "A Concise Introduction to Logic".
Recommended
Inductive reasoning powerpoint
The document discusses inductive reasoning, which involves arriving at a conclusion based on observations and facts without direct proof. It defines strong and weak inductions, providing examples of each. Strong inductions are more likely to be true while weak inductions can be proven false. Inductive reasoning is used in everyday conversations, scientific theories, and mathematics by making educated guesses based on available evidence and observations.
Inductive vs deductive reasoning
The document discusses the differences between deductive and inductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning starts with a general premise that is known to be true and uses logic to draw a specific conclusion. Inductive reasoning uses specific observations to draw a general conclusion that is probable but not certain. Examples are provided of arguments that use deductive or inductive logic.
Inductive reasoning
Inductive reasoning refers to drawing conclusions based on patterns or trends in observed data points rather than relying on a comprehensive set of facts. It involves making generalizations starting from specific individual cases. While inductive arguments can vary in strength based on how well the premises support the conclusion, induction alone does not constitute a valid proof because the conclusion may not apply to all cases, even if it has been observed to apply in many specific examples. The document provides examples of inductive reasoning arguments regarding characteristics that could be assumed about individuals based on common patterns or trends observed in their professions or activities.
Introduction to inductive and deductive reasoning
The document provides an introduction to inductive and deductive reasoning. It explains that inductive reasoning uses specific examples to derive a probable conclusion about all cases, while deductive reasoning applies a general principle to a specific instance to logically conclude. Several examples of inductive and deductive arguments are given to illustrate the concepts.
Chapter 4 logical reasoning
This document discusses different types of logical reasoning that can be used to develop theories: deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, and retroduction (abductive) reasoning. It provides examples of deductive and inductive arguments and their components. Several nursing theories developed using different logical reasoning approaches are also listed, including theories by Nightingale, Roy, Johnson, Neuman, and others. The document encourages the reader to choose a nursing theory and explain the logical form used by its theorist.
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
Inductive reasoning involves making hypotheses based on observations and working from general statements to conclusions, which are probabilistic. Deductive reasoning starts with known facts and works from general principles to specific conclusions, deriving logical certainties. The key difference is that inductive reasoning goes from specific to general, while deductive reasoning goes from general to specific.
Deductive And Inductive Reasoning
Deductive reasoning involves drawing a logically certain conclusion from general statements or premises, while inductive reasoning involves drawing a probable conclusion based on specific observations or facts. Inductive reasoning is used to make causal inferences or reason by analogy, but the conclusions are not logically certain. Both deductive and inductive reasoning involve areas of the brain associated with working memory and reasoning such as the prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia.
1.4 Validity, Truth, Soundness, Strength, Cogency
Course lecture I developed over section 1.4 of Patrick Hurley\'s "A Concise Introduction to Logic".
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
The document discusses inductive and deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning involves forming general conclusions from specific observations, while deductive reasoning draws specific conclusions from general statements. Examples are given of inductive arguments building from specific cases to a general rule, and deductive arguments applying a general premise to specific cases. The key features of deductive reasoning, including conditional statements and the five types of if-then logical structures (conditional, converse, counter example, inverse, and contrapositive), are also explained through examples.
All you Need to Know about Deductive Reasoning
The document discusses deductive reasoning and categorical syllogisms. It defines deductive reasoning as reasoning from general statements or premises to reach a logically certain conclusion. Deductive reasoning uses if-then propositions, where if the condition is met then the conclusion follows. However, deductive validity does not guarantee truthfulness, which depends on the premises. Categorical syllogisms comprise premises stating categories or classes that terms belong to, with terms representing all, some, or none of a category. Syllogisms can have valid or invalid conclusions depending on the combination of premises. People also use heuristics and biases when solving syllogisms.
BRM - Dr. TK - Characteristics of a Good Questionnaire
A good questionnaire should:
1) Ask for all the information needed to meet the research objectives.
2) Only include questions relevant to the study.
3) Avoid questions that could be better answered through other data collection methods like observation.
It should be clear, concise, not ambiguous, avoid open-ended questions unless necessary, be arranged logically, pre-tested and revised to be satisfactory for the particular survey.
Inductive and Deductive Method
This document discusses the deductive and inductive methods. It provides examples of each method. The deductive method uses logic to form a conclusion based on general statements. The inductive method uses specific observations to develop a tentative generalization. Some key differences are that the deductive method does not produce new knowledge, while the inductive method discovers new knowledge through observation. The deductive method is a quicker verification process, while induction is a slower discovery process.
All About Case Study, Types, Characteristics and Other Details
The document discusses case study as a qualitative research method. It provides an overview of the history and definitions of case study, including that it involves an in-depth analysis of a bounded system. The document also outlines characteristics of case study research such as being particularistic, descriptive, and heuristic. Additionally, it discusses types of case studies, reasons for using case studies, the steps involved, strengths and weaknesses, and case study designs.
Truth vs. Validity
This document discusses the difference between truth and validity in critical thinking. Truth is defined as accurately describing reality, whereas validity is a measurement of how certain we are of a situation. There can be many valid positions, but only one truth. Science and law use validity rather than absolute truth, as validity allows for changing views with new evidence, while truth cannot change. The key difference is that validity is based on external facts and evidence, while truth is determined internally.
Data collection tools and techniques
This document discusses various methods of data collection in nursing research. It defines primary and secondary data, with nursing research relying mainly on primary data collected directly from research subjects. It emphasizes the importance of appropriate data collection methods to adequately measure study variables and draw accurate conclusions. The document then examines different tools that can be used for data collection, including interviews, questionnaires, observations, rating scales, and checklists. It provides guidance on selecting the most suitable data collection methods based on factors like the research questions, sample size, and subjects' characteristics.
Reliability of test
This document discusses the meaning and importance of reliability in testing. It defines reliability as the consistency or stability of test scores if the test is administered multiple times. Several methods for estimating reliability are described, including test-retest reliability, alternate forms reliability, and internal consistency estimates like split-half reliability and Cronbach's alpha. Factors that can impact reliability coefficients like test length, score range, and guessing are also covered.
Logic Reasoning
The document discusses the nature and characteristics of logic. It defines logic as the science of reasoning and the study of valid inference. It notes that logic can be divided into deductive and inductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning works from general to specific, while inductive reasoning makes broad generalizations from specific observations. Examples of each type of reasoning are provided. The document also discusses properties of logical systems, including consistency, validity, completeness, and soundness.
Deductive and Inductive Arguments
Slides from the lecture on deductive and inductive arguments, Phil 57 ("Logic and Critical Reasoning") section 3, San Jose State University.
1.3 Deduction And Induction
Course lecture I developed over section 1.3 of Patrick Hurley\\\'s "A Concise Introduction to Logic".
Deductive reasoning
This document discusses deductive and inductive reasoning. It provides examples of arguments using each type of reasoning and asks the reader to determine the reasoning used. Deductive reasoning uses general statements or rules to derive a specific conclusion, working from general to specific. Inductive reasoning draws general conclusions from specific observations, working from specific to general. The document also notes that deductive reasoning conclusions can be invalid if the premises are incorrect or the reasoning is not applied properly.
Ppt methods of acquiring knowledge
1. The document discusses the scientific method and problem solving process in research. It defines scientific method as an objective, logical, and systematic process of experimentation used to explore observations and answer questions.
2. The six basic steps of the scientific method are outlined as asking a question, doing background research, constructing a hypothesis, testing the hypothesis through experimentation, analyzing the data and drawing a conclusion, and communicating the results.
3. Problem solving is described as a formal application of identifying problems, formulating hypotheses, making observations, analyzing data, and drawing conclusions. The six steps of the problem solving process are defining the problem, determining the root cause, developing solutions, selecting a solution, implementing the solution, and
Inductive and deductive reasoning
The document discusses inductive and deductive reasoning. It defines them as the two types of arguments: deductive arguments provide logically conclusive support to conclusions while inductive arguments provide probable support. Deductive arguments are based on laws and principles, using premises to logically derive a conclusion. Inductive arguments are based on experience and observation, using specific examples to generalize to broader conclusions. Examples of deductive arguments using major and minor premises are provided, along with discussions of constructing valid deductive arguments and indirect deductive methods like reductio ad absurdum. The differences between strong, weak, and cogent inductive arguments are also outlined.
Quantitative approach, type, characteristics, advantages
This document discusses quantitative research methods, including experimental, quasi-experimental, and non-experimental designs. It defines quantitative research as involving testing a theory by measuring variables numerically and analyzing results statistically. Experimental designs allow control and manipulation of variables but can be difficult to conduct on humans. Quasi-experimental and non-experimental designs are more practical but have less control. Non-experimental designs simply observe phenomena as they occur naturally.
Reliability
This document discusses the concept of reliability in testing. It provides several definitions of reliability from dictionaries and researchers. Reliability refers to the consistency and repeatability of test results. The document outlines different types of reliability, including test-retest reliability, parallel-form reliability, and internal consistency reliability. It also discusses factors that can affect reliability, such as test length, heterogeneity of scores, difficulty level, test administration, scoring, and the passage of time between test administrations. Controlling for these factors can improve a test's reliability.
Logical fallacies
This document defines and provides examples of 20 common logical fallacies: strawman, false cause, appeal to emotion, the fallacy fallacy, slippery slope, ad hominem, tu quoque, personal incredulity, special pleading, loaded question, burden of proof, ambiguity, the gambler's fallacy, bandwagon, appeal to authority, composition/division, no true Scotsman, genetic, black-or-white, and begging the question. For each fallacy, it explains what it is and provides an example to illustrate how the fallacious reasoning works.
Induction & deduction
The document discusses inductive and deductive approaches to research. Deductive reasoning moves from general premises to more specific conclusions, taking a "top-down" approach. Inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations and theories in a "bottom-up" approach. Arguments based on rules and principles use deduction, while observations tend to use induction. While deduction leads to certain conclusions, induction draws conclusions that are probable but not certain from observations.
Quantitative, qualitive and mixed research designs
This document provides an overview of quantitative method design, specifically experimental design. It discusses key concepts in experimental design including random assignment, control over extraneous variables, manipulation of treatment conditions, outcome measures, and threats to validity. It also describes different types of experimental designs including between-group designs like true experiments, quasi-experiments, and factorial designs as well as within-group designs like time series experiments, repeated measures experiments, and single subject experiments. The document provides examples and explanations of how to implement these different experimental designs.
Argument
An argument is a logical structure with premises that lead to a conclusion. Arguments can be evaluated based on validity, truth, and soundness. Validity means the conclusion follows logically from the premises. An argument is sound if it is valid and all premises are true. Inductive and deductive reasoning differ in strengths and weaknesses. Inductive relies on experience while deductive accepts fixed definitions, but may lead to apparently necessary but false conclusions. Fallacies and counterarguments should be considered when critically evaluating arguments.
Deductive and inductive method of teching
The document discusses different approaches to teaching - deductive and inductive. The deductive approach involves the teacher directly presenting information to students, while the inductive approach involves the teacher presenting many examples for students to observe patterns and concepts from. Some key differences are noted: the deductive approach is more predictable but the inductive approach tends to lead to deeper understanding and retention. The document also asks questions about personalizing learning, predictability of lessons, desired depth of understanding, and time available to consider which approach may be better suited for a given situation.
More Related Content
What's hot
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
The document discusses inductive and deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning involves forming general conclusions from specific observations, while deductive reasoning draws specific conclusions from general statements. Examples are given of inductive arguments building from specific cases to a general rule, and deductive arguments applying a general premise to specific cases. The key features of deductive reasoning, including conditional statements and the five types of if-then logical structures (conditional, converse, counter example, inverse, and contrapositive), are also explained through examples.
All you Need to Know about Deductive Reasoning
The document discusses deductive reasoning and categorical syllogisms. It defines deductive reasoning as reasoning from general statements or premises to reach a logically certain conclusion. Deductive reasoning uses if-then propositions, where if the condition is met then the conclusion follows. However, deductive validity does not guarantee truthfulness, which depends on the premises. Categorical syllogisms comprise premises stating categories or classes that terms belong to, with terms representing all, some, or none of a category. Syllogisms can have valid or invalid conclusions depending on the combination of premises. People also use heuristics and biases when solving syllogisms.
BRM - Dr. TK - Characteristics of a Good Questionnaire
A good questionnaire should:
1) Ask for all the information needed to meet the research objectives.
2) Only include questions relevant to the study.
3) Avoid questions that could be better answered through other data collection methods like observation.
It should be clear, concise, not ambiguous, avoid open-ended questions unless necessary, be arranged logically, pre-tested and revised to be satisfactory for the particular survey.
Inductive and Deductive Method
This document discusses the deductive and inductive methods. It provides examples of each method. The deductive method uses logic to form a conclusion based on general statements. The inductive method uses specific observations to develop a tentative generalization. Some key differences are that the deductive method does not produce new knowledge, while the inductive method discovers new knowledge through observation. The deductive method is a quicker verification process, while induction is a slower discovery process.
All About Case Study, Types, Characteristics and Other Details
The document discusses case study as a qualitative research method. It provides an overview of the history and definitions of case study, including that it involves an in-depth analysis of a bounded system. The document also outlines characteristics of case study research such as being particularistic, descriptive, and heuristic. Additionally, it discusses types of case studies, reasons for using case studies, the steps involved, strengths and weaknesses, and case study designs.
Truth vs. Validity
This document discusses the difference between truth and validity in critical thinking. Truth is defined as accurately describing reality, whereas validity is a measurement of how certain we are of a situation. There can be many valid positions, but only one truth. Science and law use validity rather than absolute truth, as validity allows for changing views with new evidence, while truth cannot change. The key difference is that validity is based on external facts and evidence, while truth is determined internally.
Data collection tools and techniques
This document discusses various methods of data collection in nursing research. It defines primary and secondary data, with nursing research relying mainly on primary data collected directly from research subjects. It emphasizes the importance of appropriate data collection methods to adequately measure study variables and draw accurate conclusions. The document then examines different tools that can be used for data collection, including interviews, questionnaires, observations, rating scales, and checklists. It provides guidance on selecting the most suitable data collection methods based on factors like the research questions, sample size, and subjects' characteristics.
Reliability of test
This document discusses the meaning and importance of reliability in testing. It defines reliability as the consistency or stability of test scores if the test is administered multiple times. Several methods for estimating reliability are described, including test-retest reliability, alternate forms reliability, and internal consistency estimates like split-half reliability and Cronbach's alpha. Factors that can impact reliability coefficients like test length, score range, and guessing are also covered.
Logic Reasoning
The document discusses the nature and characteristics of logic. It defines logic as the science of reasoning and the study of valid inference. It notes that logic can be divided into deductive and inductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning works from general to specific, while inductive reasoning makes broad generalizations from specific observations. Examples of each type of reasoning are provided. The document also discusses properties of logical systems, including consistency, validity, completeness, and soundness.
Deductive and Inductive Arguments
Slides from the lecture on deductive and inductive arguments, Phil 57 ("Logic and Critical Reasoning") section 3, San Jose State University.
1.3 Deduction And Induction
Course lecture I developed over section 1.3 of Patrick Hurley\\\'s "A Concise Introduction to Logic".
Deductive reasoning
This document discusses deductive and inductive reasoning. It provides examples of arguments using each type of reasoning and asks the reader to determine the reasoning used. Deductive reasoning uses general statements or rules to derive a specific conclusion, working from general to specific. Inductive reasoning draws general conclusions from specific observations, working from specific to general. The document also notes that deductive reasoning conclusions can be invalid if the premises are incorrect or the reasoning is not applied properly.
Ppt methods of acquiring knowledge
1. The document discusses the scientific method and problem solving process in research. It defines scientific method as an objective, logical, and systematic process of experimentation used to explore observations and answer questions.
2. The six basic steps of the scientific method are outlined as asking a question, doing background research, constructing a hypothesis, testing the hypothesis through experimentation, analyzing the data and drawing a conclusion, and communicating the results.
3. Problem solving is described as a formal application of identifying problems, formulating hypotheses, making observations, analyzing data, and drawing conclusions. The six steps of the problem solving process are defining the problem, determining the root cause, developing solutions, selecting a solution, implementing the solution, and
Inductive and deductive reasoning
The document discusses inductive and deductive reasoning. It defines them as the two types of arguments: deductive arguments provide logically conclusive support to conclusions while inductive arguments provide probable support. Deductive arguments are based on laws and principles, using premises to logically derive a conclusion. Inductive arguments are based on experience and observation, using specific examples to generalize to broader conclusions. Examples of deductive arguments using major and minor premises are provided, along with discussions of constructing valid deductive arguments and indirect deductive methods like reductio ad absurdum. The differences between strong, weak, and cogent inductive arguments are also outlined.
Quantitative approach, type, characteristics, advantages
This document discusses quantitative research methods, including experimental, quasi-experimental, and non-experimental designs. It defines quantitative research as involving testing a theory by measuring variables numerically and analyzing results statistically. Experimental designs allow control and manipulation of variables but can be difficult to conduct on humans. Quasi-experimental and non-experimental designs are more practical but have less control. Non-experimental designs simply observe phenomena as they occur naturally.
Reliability
This document discusses the concept of reliability in testing. It provides several definitions of reliability from dictionaries and researchers. Reliability refers to the consistency and repeatability of test results. The document outlines different types of reliability, including test-retest reliability, parallel-form reliability, and internal consistency reliability. It also discusses factors that can affect reliability, such as test length, heterogeneity of scores, difficulty level, test administration, scoring, and the passage of time between test administrations. Controlling for these factors can improve a test's reliability.
Logical fallacies
This document defines and provides examples of 20 common logical fallacies: strawman, false cause, appeal to emotion, the fallacy fallacy, slippery slope, ad hominem, tu quoque, personal incredulity, special pleading, loaded question, burden of proof, ambiguity, the gambler's fallacy, bandwagon, appeal to authority, composition/division, no true Scotsman, genetic, black-or-white, and begging the question. For each fallacy, it explains what it is and provides an example to illustrate how the fallacious reasoning works.
Induction & deduction
The document discusses inductive and deductive approaches to research. Deductive reasoning moves from general premises to more specific conclusions, taking a "top-down" approach. Inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations and theories in a "bottom-up" approach. Arguments based on rules and principles use deduction, while observations tend to use induction. While deduction leads to certain conclusions, induction draws conclusions that are probable but not certain from observations.
Quantitative, qualitive and mixed research designs
This document provides an overview of quantitative method design, specifically experimental design. It discusses key concepts in experimental design including random assignment, control over extraneous variables, manipulation of treatment conditions, outcome measures, and threats to validity. It also describes different types of experimental designs including between-group designs like true experiments, quasi-experiments, and factorial designs as well as within-group designs like time series experiments, repeated measures experiments, and single subject experiments. The document provides examples and explanations of how to implement these different experimental designs.
Argument
An argument is a logical structure with premises that lead to a conclusion. Arguments can be evaluated based on validity, truth, and soundness. Validity means the conclusion follows logically from the premises. An argument is sound if it is valid and all premises are true. Inductive and deductive reasoning differ in strengths and weaknesses. Inductive relies on experience while deductive accepts fixed definitions, but may lead to apparently necessary but false conclusions. Fallacies and counterarguments should be considered when critically evaluating arguments.
What's hot (20)
BRM - Dr. TK - Characteristics of a Good Questionnaire
BRM - Dr. TK - Characteristics of a Good Questionnaire
All About Case Study, Types, Characteristics and Other Details
All About Case Study, Types, Characteristics and Other Details
Quantitative approach, type, characteristics, advantages
Quantitative approach, type, characteristics, advantages
Quantitative, qualitive and mixed research designs
Quantitative, qualitive and mixed research designs
Viewers also liked
Deductive and inductive method of teching
The document discusses different approaches to teaching - deductive and inductive. The deductive approach involves the teacher directly presenting information to students, while the inductive approach involves the teacher presenting many examples for students to observe patterns and concepts from. Some key differences are noted: the deductive approach is more predictable but the inductive approach tends to lead to deeper understanding and retention. The document also asks questions about personalizing learning, predictability of lessons, desired depth of understanding, and time available to consider which approach may be better suited for a given situation.
Inductive research
This document discusses inductive research as an alternative approach to theory development where theories are derived from analysis of collected data rather than guiding data collection. It provides an overview of inductive research as a qualitative approach that uses exploratory motives to generate broad generalizations through a flexible design focused on natural settings and in-depth understandings. The document also outlines the process of implementing induction including data collection, examination, and identifying themes to ultimately construct typologies, theories, and models. It notes both the limitations and strengths of inductive research.
Analysis - Inductive and Deductive Arguments
The document discusses deductive and inductive arguments. It defines deductive arguments as trying to prove conclusions with inescapable logic, while inductive arguments claim conclusions are probable or likely given the premises. Common patterns of deductive reasoning include hypothetical syllogisms, categorical syllogisms, elimination arguments, and arguments based on definitions. Common patterns of inductive reasoning include generalization, prediction, appeals to authority, causal reasoning, statistics, and analogy.
Induction
The document discusses induction and orientation programs for new employees. It defines induction as a welcoming process that introduces employees to an organization's practices, policies and purpose. The purpose of induction programs is to reduce startup costs and employee turnover while developing realistic expectations and job satisfaction. Typical techniques include general orientation by HR, specific orientation by supervisors, and follow-up sessions. Benefits include creating a favorable impression and reducing turnover. Problems can include unprepared supervisors and overwhelming employees with too much information. Case studies provide examples of induction programs at two companies.
Reasoning unit
This document discusses different types of reasoning and fallacies in arguments. It defines reasoning as connecting evidence to a claim to create a logical argument. There are two main types of reasoning: deductive reasoning, which moves from general statements to specific conclusions, and inductive reasoning, which moves from specific instances to general conclusions. Common fallacies in arguments include false dilemmas, ad hominem attacks, hasty generalizations, and post hoc reasoning. Different inductive reasoning methods include causal, sign, comparison, authority, and numerous specific instances.
Reasoning & Inference
This document discusses different types of logical reasoning and inference. It defines immediate inference as deriving a new proposition from one original proposition by rearranging its terms while maintaining the same meaning. Syllogism is forming a conclusion based on two or more premises. Conversion, obversion, and contraposition are types of eduction where a new proposition is formed by changing subject and predicate terms or their contradictories. The inverse combines conversion, obversion, and contraposition.
Reasoning
1. Reasoning involves creating conclusions from evidence or premises through either inductive or deductive logic.
2. Inductive reasoning creates generalizations from examples while deductive reasoning applies generalizations to specific cases through major and minor premises that lead to a conclusion.
3. Common fallacies in reasoning include false dilemmas, appeals to emotion, slippery slopes, ad hominem attacks, hasty generalizations, and circular or ignorant arguments.
Ch12 reasoning
Reasoning is the process of generating conclusions from evidence or premises. There are three main types of reasoning: inductive reasoning which creates generalizations from examples; deductive reasoning which applies generalizations to specific cases through syllogisms; and fallacies which are errors in reasoning. Inductive reasoning uses examples, causes, signs, comparisons, or authority to form conclusions while deductive reasoning uses major and minor premises to logically deduce a conclusion.
Reasoning
Reasoning can be deductive or inductive. Deductive reasoning moves from general premises to specific conclusions, while inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations. There are five types of inductive reasoning: example, causal, sign, comparison, and reasoning from authority. Each type uses examples, causes and effects, relationships between signs and what they indicate, comparisons between analogous cases, or credible sources to form general conclusions.
Deductive and inductive method
Deductive reasoning begins with a general statement and uses logic to derive a specific conclusion. Inductive reasoning makes observations of multiple specific instances to derive a general conclusion. The document provides examples of deductive reasoning, showing how conclusions are drawn from a major premise (general statement) and minor premise (specific statement). Examples of inductive reasoning are also given, showing how repeated observations of specific instances can lead to a generalized conclusion.
Philo 1 inference
This document discusses the concepts of judgment and proposition in logic. It defines judgment as a mental act of affirming or denying a relationship between two concepts. A proposition is the verbal expression of a judgment. Judgments can be categorical or hypothetical. Categorical propositions relate two terms and can be affirmative or negative. A valid judgment requires thorough understanding of concepts and an objective perception of their relationship. Reasoning involves making inferences, deducing conclusions from premises through immediate or mediate logic. Deductive reasoning proceeds from universal to particular while inductive reasoning proceeds from particular to universal. A categorical syllogism is a three-part argument using deductive reasoning with three terms and two premises leading to a conclusion.
THINKING
The document summarizes key concepts in cognitive psychology and language development. It discusses how the mind organizes information, different types of thinking including directed, associative, and critical thinking. It also covers problem solving strategies like trial and error, algorithms, heuristics, and insight. Finally, it defines language and discusses debates around whether language acquisition is innate or learned, and whether language or thought develops first in children.
Deductive method by Jamie Vasquez
The document discusses the deductive teaching method. It begins by explaining that in this method, the teacher directly tells or shows students what they want to teach, such as stating a rule for adding fractions and then providing examples. Another example given is a teacher explaining how geographic location influences way of life by showing an economic map of the Philippines. The document then lists the steps of the deductive approach as clear recognition of the problem, searching for a tentative hypothesis, formulating the hypothesis, and verification. Finally, it discusses the advantages as being straight to the point and allowing more practice time, and disadvantages as being quite formal, encouraging rule-based learning, and passive lessons.
Types of attention
Attention and it's types are discussed in this presentation with examples it would be help you to understand attention, it's importance, and where, when, and why we pay attention. thanks' MNA Rajput.
Deductive and inductive method
The document discusses the inductive and deductive methods of problem solving. The inductive method involves moving from specific observations and examples to broader generalizations and conclusions. It allows students to discover truths for themselves through a process of observation, analysis, classification, abstraction and application. While slow, it promotes active learning and self-confidence. The deductive method provides students with general principles and rules and asks them to apply these to specific examples. It is faster but does not facilitate self-discovery or independent thinking. Both methods have merits and limitations depending on the learning context and goals.
Making inferences (definition, strategies, exercises)
The document discusses making inferences when reading. It provides examples of inferring characters' feelings, motives, and the author's purpose. Readers must combine the written information with their own life experiences to infer deeper meaning. The document contains scenarios where the reader must infer details that are not explicitly stated, such as inferring a man is angry from his shouting or that someone was killed from seeing a bloody knife. It emphasizes that readers should view a text as a "word picture" and infer details about the setting, characters' personalities and emotions, and characters' motives from clues provided.
Induction
The document discusses induction or orientation for new employees. It defines induction as the process of welcoming a new employee and introducing them to the company, practices, policies and purposes. The objectives of induction are to reduce employee anxiety, develop realistic expectations and improve employee satisfaction and retention. Key aspects of induction include introducing the employee to their role and department, company policies and benefits, and addressing any questions. The document also discusses different types of induction approaches and best practices for conducting an effective induction process.
Quasi Experimental Method
This document discusses quasi-experimental research designs. It defines quasi-experiments as resembling true experiments but lacking full control, such as random assignment. It describes various quasi-experimental designs including one group pre-test post-test, non-equivalent control group, interrupted time series, and time series with non-equivalent controls. Examples are provided of each design along with threats to validity. Common uses of quasi-experiments are discussed as well as advantages such as being able to be conducted in natural settings.
Business research methods
The document provides an introduction to research methods for business. It defines research as thoroughly studying and analyzing a problem to find solutions. There are two types of research: applied research which solves current business problems, and basic research which generates generalizable knowledge. Research helps managers make better decisions by systematically investigating issues, gathering relevant information, analyzing data, and identifying solutions. Knowledge of research principles allows managers to effectively solve problems and work with internal or external researchers.
Viewers also liked (20)
Making inferences (definition, strategies, exercises)
Making inferences (definition, strategies, exercises)
Similar to Inductive reasoning
Schwartz Reptile ABA 2016
This document summarizes a presentation given at the ABA Spring 2016 National Legal Malpractice Conference on the "Reptile Theory" trial strategy. The Reptile Theory aims to activate the primal, instinctual part of jurors' brains by emphasizing danger, appealing to fear, and portraying the case as a matter of public safety. The summary discusses keys to a plaintiff verdict according to the Reptile Theory, including providing jurors with motive, sympathy, anger, a desire to send a message, and perception of social injustice. It also outlines strategies for applying the Reptile Theory in a legal malpractice case and techniques for combatting the Reptile Theory approach.
Self evaluation Bias.pptx
The document discusses the hot hand fallacy and self-evaluation bias. The hot hand fallacy refers to the mistaken belief that a player or entity is more likely to succeed based on previous successes. Studies have shown this is a cognitive bias and past performance does not indicate future results. Self-evaluation bias refers to how people attribute successes internally but blame failures on external factors to preserve their self-esteem. This bias can negatively impact workplaces and sports by distorting perceptions of self and causing conflicts with others.
Critical reasoning
Critical reasoning involves seeking alternative explanations and endorsing positions justified by available information. Critical thinkers present positions honestly and clearly while determining the structure and focus of arguments. When analyzing arguments, one identifies premises, conclusions, assumptions, and the overall argument structure. A premise provides reasons for a conclusion, while an assumption must be true for the argument to be valid. Strengthening an argument confirms its assumption, while weakening it challenges the assumption. Paradoxical questions explain discrepancies in seemingly contradictory information.
Types of Arguments (1).pptx
If there is something that would be considered difficult by most of the students but even young researchers, that would be to clearly define an argument and also manage to convey it without sounding judgemental or racist.
Dean R Berry Evaluation of Claims: Success Traits
The author analyzes an article that claims three traits drive success: a superiority complex, insecurity, and impulse control. The article cites statistics showing certain cultural groups in America have high levels of economic success. These include Indian-, Iranian-, Lebanese-, and Chinese-Americans earning higher incomes than average. Mormons also hold top corporate positions disproportionate to their population. Jews account for a large percentage of positions like Supreme Court justices despite being a small portion of the population. The author argues these traits can be applied to individuals, cultural groups, and nations like the U.S. to understand what drives success.
Dean R Berry Pro and Con: Torture is Just a Means of Fighting Terrorism d
Dean R Berry Pro and Con: Torture is Just a Means of Fighting Terrorism dRiverside County Office of Education
The document analyzes a persuasive text that argues torture is justified as a means of fighting terrorism. It discusses the author's claim that torture is justified in "ticking time bomb" scenarios where lives could be saved, and also under normal circumstances to prevent future terrorist plots. The author provides supporting arguments based on utilitarian principles that the benefits of saving many lives outweigh the costs to one person being tortured. However, the document notes readers should carefully examine claims and evidence in persuasive texts.03. intro to argument, informal fallacies
This document provides an overview of argumentation and fallacies discussed across several chapters from the book "Thank You for Arguing" by Jay Heinrichs. It includes summaries of key concepts from chapters 1-3, 14-16 such as deductive vs inductive reasoning, common logical fallacies like straw man arguments, and the Toulmin model for constructing arguments. Example arguments and logical reasoning puzzles are also presented to demonstrate different logical structures. The document aims to teach objective analysis of arguments and identification of logical fallacies.
makinginferencesanddrawingconclusions.ppt
The document discusses making inferences and drawing conclusions when reading. It explains that inferences go beyond direct statements to implications, and conclusions refer to implied information. It provides examples of inferring meanings from context clues like general sense, examples, antonyms, and contrasts. The document also distinguishes between facts, which can be verified, and opinions, which are subjective judgments, and provides guidance on identifying facts and opinions in texts.
Logical fallacies powerpoint
This document defines logical fallacies and common types of fallacious arguments. It explains that an argument consists of premises and a conclusion, and fallacies occur when arguments fail in certain ways. Sixteen specific fallacies are described, including hasty generalization, slippery slope, appeal to authority, straw man, and equivocation. The document concludes with tips for preventing fallacious reasoning such as arguing against oneself and fairly characterizing opposing arguments.
Dean r berry persuasive arguments i am not going to your gay wedding
Dean r berry persuasive arguments i am not going to your gay weddingRiverside County Office of Education
The document provides reading strategies for analyzing persuasive texts. It discusses looking for the author's claim, evidence to support the claim, and reasoning. Good evidence includes facts, data, examples, and avoiding logical fallacies. The summary should be in 3 sentences or less.Common investment mistakes
This document discusses common investment mistakes and biases that can negatively impact investment decisions. It begins by outlining several cognitive biases like overconfidence, availability bias, and loss aversion that can lead investors to make poor choices. It then provides examples of how these biases might influence decisions around individual stocks. The document concludes by discussing lessons that can be learned from successful long-term investors like Warren Buffett, including the importance of patience, understanding investments, and having a consistent strategy.
Thinking critically3
The document discusses different types of reasoning including induction, deduction, and logical fallacies. It provides examples of each:
- Induction involves reasoning from specific facts or instances to arrive at a general conclusion. An example is concluding the motor vehicle center is inefficient based on multiple unproductive visits.
- Deductive reasoning moves from a general statement to a specific conclusion. An example is concluding your time will be wasted at the motor vehicle center tomorrow based on the premise it wastes people's time.
- Logical fallacies are flaws in reasoning that seem logical but are invalid. Examples of fallacies discussed include hasty generalization, self-contradiction, guilt by association, and ambiguity.
Critical Thinking as REASONING.pptx
This document provides examples and explanations of different types of logical fallacies, specifically appeal fallacies. It discusses 12 different appeal fallacies: appeal to fear, appeal to flattery, appeal to novelty, appeal to pity, appeal to ridicule, appeal to emotions, appeal to disgust, appeal to spite, appeal to authority, appeal to coherence, appeal to consensus, and appeal to common practice. For each fallacy, it provides a definition and an example to illustrate how that fallacy works. The document aims to help the reader identify and understand different types of appeal fallacies that exploit emotional reasoning rather than logical reasoning.
New Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation.pptx
This document provides guidance on essay structure and writing, including:
1. The typical structure of an introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion.
2. Examples of how to write an introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion, including using a thesis statement, topic sentences, examples, and summarizing ideas.
3. Tips for developing paragraphs, avoiding plagiarism through paraphrasing, using reporting verbs and linking words, and making writing more academic through nominalization.
How to Be a Smart Consumer of News
In this lecture, I introduce several common cognitive biases and logical fallacies, explain how to identify fake news, and suggest steps that can be taken to enhance one's ability to be a smart consumer of news.
Making inferences and drawing conclusions
The document provides information about making inferences and drawing conclusions when reading. It discusses how readers can infer deeper meanings that are implied but not directly stated by using clues and hints from the text. It explains that inferences involve going beyond surface details and choosing the most likely explanation or conclusion based on the provided facts. The document also contrasts facts, which can be verified, from opinions, which are subjective judgments that cannot be proven accurate. It provides examples to illustrate how readers can infer meanings of words from context clues like general sense, examples, antonyms, and contrasts.
Norton Field Guide for Speaking 7.2
This document summarizes key concepts about critical thinking and arguments from a chapter on critical thinking. It discusses the components of a strong argument, including claims, evidence, and warrants. It also covers different types of reasoning like deductive and inductive. Additionally, it outlines common fallacies to avoid, such as appeals to emotion, authority, or popularity. The goal is to help readers understand how to construct persuasive arguments and identify flawed logic.
Decision making by objection Cuban missile
The document summarizes and critiques a model of decision making called "decision making by objection" as applied to analyze decision making during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
The key points are:
1) The model argues decision making during the crisis did not follow a standard goal-oriented process but involved discovering goals through debate as alternatives were proposed and objected to.
2) Findings from analyzing ExCom meeting records found alternatives were evaluated based on their probability of success or making the situation worse, not on clearly defined goals.
3) The model is critiqued for ignoring individual interests and overemphasizing shared goal generation, and for only using data from 4 of 13 ExCom meetings to develop the analysis
Inquests and serious case reviews - Mental health matters, Exeter, Tuesday 6 ...
An overview of the inquest process, its role, giving evidence and how to ensure clarity for serious case reviews.
Chris Trudeau - Clear legal communication: A drafting toolkit for non-lawyers
Presented by Christopher Trudeau, JD, on September 26, 2013 at the fourth annual Center for Health Literacy Conference: Plain Talk in Complex Times.
Similar to Inductive reasoning (20)
Dean R Berry Pro and Con: Torture is Just a Means of Fighting Terrorism d
Dean R Berry Pro and Con: Torture is Just a Means of Fighting Terrorism d
Dean r berry persuasive arguments i am not going to your gay wedding
Dean r berry persuasive arguments i am not going to your gay wedding
Inquests and serious case reviews - Mental health matters, Exeter, Tuesday 6 ...
Inquests and serious case reviews - Mental health matters, Exeter, Tuesday 6 ...
Chris Trudeau - Clear legal communication: A drafting toolkit for non-lawyers
Chris Trudeau - Clear legal communication: A drafting toolkit for non-lawyers
More from BSEPhySci14
Film Showing
The document discusses various methods for using films as teaching tools in the classroom. It notes that films can bring realism to lessons, engage students, and serve as a substitute for field trips. However, it also acknowledges some disadvantages, such as the time required to view films and potential distractions from their content. The document then provides nine specific lesson plan ideas for incorporating films into class, such as creating worksheets for students to fill out either during or after viewing and stopping the film periodically for discussion.
PROJECT METHOD (EXPLORATORY APPROACH)
The project method is an instructional approach where students apply the skills and knowledge they have learned to solve real-world problems with minimal teacher direction. Introduced in the 18th century for architecture and engineering students, it was later expanded by William Heard Kilpatrick to be a child-centered, progressive philosophy of education. While time-consuming, the project method gives students hands-on experience, enhances their skills, and allows them to be creative and imaginative. However, it can isolate students to a single activity for long periods.
Problem solving method
This document outlines a problem solving method. It begins with two quotes about imagination and originality. It then lists the program objectives, which include actively listening to understand problems, taking the first step to solve problems, clarifying problems, and utilizing creativity and collaboration. It also discusses examining decision making models and practicing problem solving through case studies and discussions. The document defines key terms like problem solving, decision making, and critical thinking. It asks questions about teaching problem solving skills and the skills and processes used in problem solving. Finally, it discusses people who are good at problem solving, like experts in a field and those who can think of alternatives.
Process oriented method ‘inquiry’
The document discusses the inquiry method of teaching, which models the investigative process used by scientists. It involves allowing students to explore, inquire, and discover new learnings through self-directed exploration, rather than being told everything. The key steps are to define the topic or question, guide students in planning how to gather data or information, and have students present their findings. Instructional characteristics include employing processes like inferring, hypothesizing, and experimenting. Students formulate their own hypotheses and methods for testing them.
INTEGRATIVE TEACHING BY: Jepoy Pajalla Floriano
Integrative teaching focuses on making connections between subjects rather than teaching isolated facts. It aims to link what is learned in school to real-life situations to develop problem-solving and discussion of real-world issues. Integrative teaching also considers individual learner differences like multiple intelligences and learning styles. Some techniques of integrative teaching include content-based instruction where language is used to learn new content, thematic teaching which organizes curriculum around broad themes, focusing inquiry where students investigate real-world questions of their choice, and generic competency models.
Laboratory Method of Teaching
This document outlines the goals and procedures for laboratory work in education. It discusses:
- The major goals of laboratory work are to teach observational and manual skills, improve understanding of scientific inquiry, and develop problem-solving abilities.
- Laboratory methods include experimental and demonstration approaches to promote discovery, problem-solving, and mastery of concepts and skills.
- Key steps in the laboratory method are preparation, work periods where students conduct experiments or activities, and culminating activities where results are discussed.
- Benefits are that students learn by doing and develop observation, reasoning, and scientific thinking, while disadvantages include time and cost ineffectiveness.
Deductive method by Jamie Vasquez
The document discusses the deductive teaching method. It begins by explaining that in this method, the teacher directly tells or shows students what they want to teach, such as stating a rule for adding fractions and then providing examples. Another example given is a teacher beginning a lesson on how geography influences way of life by showing an economic map of the Philippines. The document then lists the steps of the deductive approach as clear recognition of the problem, searching for a tentative hypothesis, formulating the hypothesis, and verification. Finally, it outlines the advantages as being straight to the point and allowing more practice time, and the disadvantages as being formal, encouraging rule-based learning, and passive lessons.
Inductive method by Anna Mapeth Evangelista
The inductive method is an indirect teaching approach where the teacher presents multiple examples to students rather than stating rules upfront. Students observe the examples, discuss patterns and commonalities, and work to generalize rules and conclusions. The key steps are: (1) presenting examples, (2) having students observe patterns, (3) guiding students to determine general rules or principles through discussion, and (4) testing understandings with new examples. Advantages include increased student engagement and starting with their prior knowledge, while disadvantages are that it requires more time and expert facilitation skills from teachers.
Reflective teaching by Anjanette Penillos
Reflective teaching conceptualizes teaching as a complex skill requiring teachers to make judgments in how to act. High-quality teaching depends on teachers having professional expertise, which is developed through reflective practice. Reflective teaching supports teachers' professional development throughout their careers from student teachers to experienced teachers. It should lead to improvements in teacher skills and student education outcomes while satisfying performance standards.
Bustamante robert c
This document discusses active learning and different types of thought-stimulating activities that can produce meaningful learning, including direct learning, learning by discovery, and problem solving. It also discusses exploratory research, noting that its principal use is to increase understanding of a subject, though conclusions should not be drawn from it due to lack of statistical strength. Exploratory research provides flexibility in sources and can help direct subsequent research approaches.
Bustamante educ3
This document discusses active learning and different types of thought-stimulating activities that can produce meaningful learning, including direct learning, learning by discovery, and problem solving. It also discusses exploratory research, noting that its principal use is to increase understanding of a subject, though not draw definite conclusions. Exploratory research provides flexibility in sources and can help direct subsequent research approaches.
Metacognitive
Metacognition involves thinking about one's own cognitive processes and thinking style. It is essential for effective learning as it allows people to self-monitor and adapt their learning strategies. The advantages of metacognition include developing independent, life-long learners who can control their own learning. Teachers can foster metacognition in students by using multiple representations of concepts and activities to help students think about how they learn best. The goal of metacognition is to help students set learning goals and adapt their strategies based on self-monitoring of progress towards goals.
Field Trip
The document discusses planning and conducting field trips with students. It outlines objectives like helping students draw conclusions and acquire knowledge. Field trips enhance the curriculum by providing hands-on experiences, build teamwork, and introduce new experiences. Both advantages and disadvantages are covered, such as the extra preparation required from teachers. Steps for planning a successful field trip are also outlined, including determining educational goals, acquiring permissions, and preparing students.
Project Method
The project method is an educational approach where students work to solve practical problems over several days or weeks. Projects can involve building something, designing something, or other hands-on work. The method was popularized in the early 20th century as a way to make learning more active and student-driven. Key principles include learning through experience and activity, having a clear purpose for projects, and allowing students freedom in their work. Common types of projects include those focused on production, consumption, problem-solving, or skill-building. Advocates believe the project method engages students and helps develop skills like cooperation and independent thinking.
Arnel D. Apinado 2P(demonstration method)
The document is a report prepared by Arnel D. Apinado 2P for his adviser Mr. Caloy Cornejo. It likely contains details about a school project or assignment given to the student by their adviser.
Cooperative Learning
Cooperative learning involves students working in groups to help each other learn. It has two key components: a cooperative incentive structure and cooperative task structure. Groups are made up of students with mixed abilities. Each student is accountable for their own learning while also contributing to the group. Effective cooperative learning involves heterogeneous grouping, ensuring students have necessary social skills, clear goals and evaluation methods for tasks. The document then describes various cooperative learning structures and their purposes, advantages of cooperative learning, potential disadvantages, and provides an example lesson on constructive communication strategies.
CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH by: GESILLE S. CAÑETE
This document discusses constructivism as a learning theory and provides examples of its strengths and weaknesses. Constructivism believes that knowledge is not passively received but actively built by learners. It emphasizes that students learn by combining new information with their existing knowledge and experiences. The document also outlines the 5E instructional model - engage, explore, explain, elaborate, and evaluate - as a framework for lesson planning based on constructivist principles. Examples are given to illustrate how divergent thinking could cause problems where conformity is essential, such as filing taxes or logging into a workplace computer.
Reflective Teaching
Reflective teaching involves critically examining one's own teaching practices and experiences in the classroom. Teachers collect data on their teaching through methods like keeping journals, conducting observations, collecting student feedback, and recording lessons. They then analyze the data to identify patterns and underlying beliefs, evaluate different perspectives, and reflect on how to improve. The goal is ongoing professional development and ensuring students maximize their learning.
Brainstorming
This document discusses brainstorming techniques, including its definition as a group creativity method for generating many ideas to solve a problem spontaneously. It describes individual and group brainstorming, tips for effective group brainstorming like having a clear objective and not criticizing ideas. A 9-step process for structured brainstorming is outlined involving individuals writing down ideas that are passed around and built upon. The advantages of encouraging creative thinking and involvement are mentioned, as well as potential disadvantages like lack of participation or control.
Socio-Emotional Development
The document discusses Erik Erikson's fourth stage of psychosocial development, which occurs during the preschool years. In this stage, called industry vs. inferiority, children develop a sense of pride in their accomplishments and a self-concept through interactions at school and feedback from parents and teachers. Making friends is also important at this stage as children begin to interact with peers and learn social skills. The document provides tips for parents and teachers to help children develop positively during this stage of psychosocial development.
More from BSEPhySci14 (20)
Recently uploaded
Bossa N’ Roll Records by Ismael Vazquez.
Bossa N Roll Records presentation by Izzy Vazquez for Music Retail and Distribution class at Full Sail University
Wound healing PPT
This document provides an overview of wound healing, its functions, stages, mechanisms, factors affecting it, and complications.
A wound is a break in the integrity of the skin or tissues, which may be associated with disruption of the structure and function.
Healing is the body’s response to injury in an attempt to restore normal structure and functions.
Healing can occur in two ways: Regeneration and Repair
There are 4 phases of wound healing: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. This document also describes the mechanism of wound healing. Factors that affect healing include infection, uncontrolled diabetes, poor nutrition, age, anemia, the presence of foreign bodies, etc.
Complications of wound healing like infection, hyperpigmentation of scar, contractures, and keloid formation.
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
The recent surge in pro-Palestine student activism has prompted significant responses from universities, ranging from negotiations and divestment commitments to increased transparency about investments in companies supporting the war on Gaza. This activism has led to the cessation of student encampments but also highlighted the substantial sacrifices made by students, including academic disruptions and personal risks. The primary drivers of these protests are poor university administration, lack of transparency, and inadequate communication between officials and students. This study examines the profound emotional, psychological, and professional impacts on students engaged in pro-Palestine protests, focusing on Generation Z's (Gen-Z) activism dynamics. This paper explores the significant sacrifices made by these students and even the professors supporting the pro-Palestine movement, with a focus on recent global movements. Through an in-depth analysis of printed and electronic media, the study examines the impacts of these sacrifices on the academic and personal lives of those involved. The paper highlights examples from various universities, demonstrating student activism's long-term and short-term effects, including disciplinary actions, social backlash, and career implications. The researchers also explore the broader implications of student sacrifices. The findings reveal that these sacrifices are driven by a profound commitment to justice and human rights, and are influenced by the increasing availability of information, peer interactions, and personal convictions. The study also discusses the broader implications of this activism, comparing it to historical precedents and assessing its potential to influence policy and public opinion. The emotional and psychological toll on student activists is significant, but their sense of purpose and community support mitigates some of these challenges. However, the researchers call for acknowledging the broader Impact of these sacrifices on the future global movement of FreePalestine.
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 8 - CẢ NĂM - FRIENDS PLUS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (B...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 8 - CẢ NĂM - FRIENDS PLUS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (B...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/nrwz52lilmrw6m5kqeqn83q6vbdp8yzpCapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptx
Slides from a Capitol Technology University webinar held June 20, 2024. The webinar featured Dr. Donovan Wright, presenting on the Department of Defense Digital Transformation.
skeleton System.pdf (skeleton system wow)
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
إضغ بين إيديكم من أقوى الملازم التي صممتها
ملزمة تشريح الجهاز الهيكلي (نظري 3)
💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
تتميز هذهِ الملزمة بعِدة مُميزات :
1- مُترجمة ترجمة تُناسب جميع المستويات
2- تحتوي على 78 رسم توضيحي لكل كلمة موجودة بالملزمة (لكل كلمة !!!!)
#فهم_ماكو_درخ
3- دقة الكتابة والصور عالية جداً جداً جداً
4- هُنالك بعض المعلومات تم توضيحها بشكل تفصيلي جداً (تُعتبر لدى الطالب أو الطالبة بإنها معلومات مُبهمة ومع ذلك تم توضيح هذهِ المعلومات المُبهمة بشكل تفصيلي جداً
5- الملزمة تشرح نفسها ب نفسها بس تكلك تعال اقراني
6- تحتوي الملزمة في اول سلايد على خارطة تتضمن جميع تفرُعات معلومات الجهاز الهيكلي المذكورة في هذهِ الملزمة
واخيراً هذهِ الملزمة حلالٌ عليكم وإتمنى منكم إن تدعولي بالخير والصحة والعافية فقط
كل التوفيق زملائي وزميلاتي ، زميلكم محمد الذهبي 💊💊
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
BIOLOGY NATIONAL EXAMINATION COUNCIL (NECO) 2024 PRACTICAL MANUAL.pptx
Practical manual for National Examination Council, Nigeria.
Contains guides on answering questions on the specimens provided
NIPER 2024 MEMORY BASED QUESTIONS.ANSWERS TO NIPER 2024 QUESTIONS.NIPER JEE 2...
NIPER JEE PYQ
NIPER JEE QUESTIONS
MOST FREQUENTLY ASK QUESTIONS
NIPER MEMORY BASED QUWSTIONS
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two Hearts
These slides walk through the story of 1 Samuel. Samuel is the last judge of Israel. The people reject God and want a king. Saul is anointed as the first king, but he is not a good king. David, the shepherd boy is anointed and Saul is envious of him. David shows honor while Saul continues to self destruct.
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
Recently uploaded (20)
REASIGNACION 2024 UGEL CHUPACA 2024 UGEL CHUPACA.pdf
REASIGNACION 2024 UGEL CHUPACA 2024 UGEL CHUPACA.pdf
SWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptx
SWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptx
Juneteenth Freedom Day 2024 David Douglas School District
Juneteenth Freedom Day 2024 David Douglas School District
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 8 - CẢ NĂM - FRIENDS PLUS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (B...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 8 - CẢ NĂM - FRIENDS PLUS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (B...
CapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptx
CapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptx
220711130088 Sumi Basak Virtual University EPC 3.pptx
220711130088 Sumi Basak Virtual University EPC 3.pptx
BIOLOGY NATIONAL EXAMINATION COUNCIL (NECO) 2024 PRACTICAL MANUAL.pptx
BIOLOGY NATIONAL EXAMINATION COUNCIL (NECO) 2024 PRACTICAL MANUAL.pptx
NIPER 2024 MEMORY BASED QUESTIONS.ANSWERS TO NIPER 2024 QUESTIONS.NIPER JEE 2...
NIPER 2024 MEMORY BASED QUESTIONS.ANSWERS TO NIPER 2024 QUESTIONS.NIPER JEE 2...
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...
Inductive reasoning
- 1. INDUCTIVE REASONING BY: SISTOSO, CLAUDEN N.
- 2. The student is able to (I can): • Use inductive reasoning to identify patterns and make conjectures • Find counterexamples to disprove conjectures • Identify, write, and analyze the truth value of conditional statements. • Write the inverse, converse, and contrapositive of a conditional statement.
- 3. 1. 6 types of inductive reasoning “GASCAP” • Generalization • Analogy • Sign • Causation • Authority • Parallel Case
- 4. 1. 6 types of inductive reasoning “GASCAP” • Generalization • Analogy • Sign • Causation • Authority • Parallel Case
- 5. 2. Inductive Vs. Deductive reasoning • Inductive • Moves from specific observations to general claims • Seeks to reduce uncertainty of claims • “Informal”/probability • Deductive • Moves from general premises to specific conclusions • Seeks absolute certainty of conclusions • “Formal”/truth 3. Example of Inductive Reasoning • Specific observations • Red light cameras decrease speeds • Red light cameras increase expectations of being caught • Red light cameras identify repeat offenders • General claim • Red light cameras increase safety
- 6. 4. Example of Deductive Reasoning • General premises • Major premise: all red-light cameras reduce accidents at intersections. • Minor Premise: Costa Mesa has installed red light cameras at intersections. • Conclusion: Costa Mesa has fewer accidents at these intersections. 5. Reasoning by generalization • Searching for predictable patterns in details, examples. • True in these cases equals usually true of the class. • Specific observations: • In 2000 we averaged 15 albacore caught • In 2001 we averaged 13 albacore caught • In 2002 we averaged 16 albacore caught • General claim • We will probably average more than 10 albacore this year.
- 7. 6. Reasoning by analogy • Observing fundamental similarity between the characteristics of dissimilar cases. • Specific observations: • Americans are like energy junkies. • Oil Producing nation’s are like pushers. • General claim: • The U.S. should decrease energy dependence. 7. Reasoning by sign • Observation of symptoms, conditions,or marks used to prove a certain condition exits. • Specific observations: • The current water temperature is optimal. • Sea life is currently abundant. • There are boats around us fishing. • General claim: • The current likelihood of catching fish is high.
- 8. 8. Reasoning by causation • Observation of a temporal connection between events in which one produces the other. • Specific observations: • Steroid users develop emotional problems. • Steroids decrease sexual drive. • Steroids create secondary sexual characteristics. • General claim: • Steroid use leads to negative consequences. 9. Reasoning by authority • Reliance on the credibility of the source of information to warrant acceptance of claim. • Specific observations: • Professional athletes and team owners rely on the expertise of arbitrators. • Doctors and patients utilize arbitration. • General Claim: • Because I am a professional arbitrator, you should abide by my decision
- 9. 10. Reasoning by parallel case • Observing similarities in two or more similar cases • Specific observations • Both Bush presidencies had a war with Iraq. • Both Bush presidencies had problems with the economy. • Both Bush presidencies altered campaign promises. • General Claim: • Both Bush presidencies will end up as a single term. 11. Locating reasoning in units of argument • Finding specific observations: • Examine the evidence in the grounds • Look for specific language that states or implies reasoning • Decide what types of reasoning is NOT being utilized. • Select from remaining types to make a “best guess.” • Making general claims: • Claim should reflect a reasonable position based on the evidence in the grounds. • Making warrants: • The warrant should make a statement about why the evidence in the grounds supports that claim.