The document discusses hard and soft acid-base (HSAB) theory, which classifies acids and bases as either hard or soft based on their size, charge density, and polarizability. Hard acids and bases are small and nonpolarizable, preferring to interact with each other. Soft acids and bases are larger and more polarizable, preferring to interact with each other. This preferential hard-hard and soft-soft interaction leads to differences in properties like solubility, coordination preferences, and reaction kinetics. The theory has applications in understanding solubility trends, ligand substitution reactions, and the geochemical partitioning of elements.
HSAB concept is an initialism for "hard and soft (Lewis) acids and bases". Also known as the Pearson acid-base concept, HSAB is widely used in chemistry for explaining stability of compounds, reaction mechanisms and pathways.
HSAB concept is an initialism for "hard and soft (Lewis) acids and bases". Also known as the Pearson acid-base concept, HSAB is widely used in chemistry for explaining stability of compounds, reaction mechanisms and pathways.
Classification Of Mechanisms, Ligand Substitution In Octahedral Complexes Without Breaking Metal-ligand Bond, Substitution Reaction In Square Planar Complexes, Factors Which Affect The Rate Of Substitution, Trans Effect (Labilizing Effect), Theories and applications Of Trans Effect
Classification Of Mechanisms, Ligand Substitution In Octahedral Complexes Without Breaking Metal-ligand Bond, Substitution Reaction In Square Planar Complexes, Factors Which Affect The Rate Of Substitution, Trans Effect (Labilizing Effect), Theories and applications Of Trans Effect
ii)State whether you would expect the following Group 13 metal cations.docxtristans3
ii)State whether you would expect the following Group 13 metal cations to act as Lewis acids or bases. Order the cations in terms of softest to hardest. Explain your answer. Al3+, Tl3+, Ga3+, Tl+
(iii) State whether you would expect the following Group 15 hydrides to act as Lewis acids or bases. Order the hydrides in terms of softest to hardest. Explain your answer. PH3, NH3, AsH3
Solution
ii) The given group 13 metal cations will act as a Lewis acids , because cations are are electron deficient and act as a electron acceptor.
Hard Acids are Lewis acid which are small in size and most likely are the light metal cation with high positive oxidation state like Al 3+
Soft Acids are Lewis acid which are larger in size and most likely are the heavy metal cation associated with low oxidation state like Tl 3+ Tl +
Oder of cation from softest to hardest   Tl + < Tl 3+ < Al 3+
(iii) The given Group 15 hydrides will acts as Lewis Base, because Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Arsenic has a lone pair of electron that it can donate.
Hard Base are Lewis base anions or neutral molecules which are not easily polarizable like NH 3
Soft Base are Lewis base anions or neutral molecules which are easily polarizable like PH 3 and AsH 3
Order the hydrides in terms of softest to hardest AsH 3 < PH 3 <NH 3
.
This is mainly based on Hard - Soft acid base theory.Hard Acid .pdfaashwini4
This is mainly based on Hard - Soft acid base theory.
Hard Acid and bases :
i) Small in size
ii) Compact
iii) Nonpolarizable
Ex: Na+ , Al3+ , F-, Cl-
Soft acids and base :
i) Larger in size
ii) Low electronegativity
iii) Highly polarizable
ii) Low electronegativity
iii) Highly polarizable
Ex: Cu+, Hg+ , H-,I-
It should be remembered that hard acid reacts with a hard base and soft acid reacts with a soft
base.
Here Hg+ is a soft, so it reacts with a soft base to form a stable compound.
It should be remembered that hard acid reacts with a hard base and soft acid reacts with a soft
base.
Here Hg+ is a soft, so it reacts with a soft base to form a stable compound.
sulfide is a soft base whereas silicates, carbonates, and Oxides are hard bases. Hence Hg is
avilable as HgS.
Zn is a border line acid. It will have the intermediate properties between the hard and soft.
It is mainly avilable as ZnS. Even ZnO is also avilable.
Zn is a border line acid. It will have the intermediate properties between the hard and soft.
It is mainly avilable as ZnS. Even ZnO is also avilable.
Solution
This is mainly based on Hard - Soft acid base theory.
Hard Acid and bases :
i) Small in size
ii) Compact
iii) Nonpolarizable
Ex: Na+ , Al3+ , F-, Cl-
Soft acids and base :
i) Larger in size
ii) Low electronegativity
iii) Highly polarizable
ii) Low electronegativity
iii) Highly polarizable
Ex: Cu+, Hg+ , H-,I-
It should be remembered that hard acid reacts with a hard base and soft acid reacts with a soft
base.
Here Hg+ is a soft, so it reacts with a soft base to form a stable compound.
It should be remembered that hard acid reacts with a hard base and soft acid reacts with a soft
base.
Here Hg+ is a soft, so it reacts with a soft base to form a stable compound.
sulfide is a soft base whereas silicates, carbonates, and Oxides are hard bases. Hence Hg is
avilable as HgS.
Zn is a border line acid. It will have the intermediate properties between the hard and soft.
It is mainly avilable as ZnS. Even ZnO is also avilable.
Zn is a border line acid. It will have the intermediate properties between the hard and soft.
It is mainly avilable as ZnS. Even ZnO is also avilable..
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Hard soft acid-base theory
1. Yashwantrao Chavan College of Science, Karad
Department of Chemistry
Dr. S. H. Burungale
Hard-Soft Acid-Base Theory
2. Hard-Soft Acid-Base Theory
1.1 Classification of acids and bases as hard and soft.
1.2 Theoretical bases of hardness and softness
1.3 Pearson’s HSAB concept.
1.4 Acid – Base strength and hardness and softness.
1.5 Application and limitations of HSAB principle.
3. Limitations of Lewis Acids and
Bases
failed to provide a definite and uniform
scale to measure the relative strength of
acid and base
In 1958 this was done by Ahrland , Chatt and
Davies by classifying the acids or bases into
general categories .Class – “a” and Class- “ b”
According to them the two categories of metal ions
(Lewis acids)are as follows –
4. Physical meanings behind HSAB
1 ionization energy & electronegativity
2 polarizability
3 HOMO-LUMO gap: large for hard
species, small for soft species
4 soft-soft interactions imply covalency;
and hard-hard interactions are for ionic
bonding
5. I) Class (a) – The metal ions which prefer to from
stable complexes with the ligands having donor
atom of the first members of Gr.15 th(N),16 th(O),
and 17 th(F) in the periodic table . .
Examples are – Alkali metals , Alkaline
earth metals and the first row transition
metals in high oxidation state (e.g.fe3+
,Co3+.Etc. belong to class (a) acids ) .
6. ii)Class (b )- The other metal ions which prefer
to from their most stable complexes with the
ligands having donor atom of the lower
members of Gr.15 th(P,As,Sb),16 th(S,Se,Te),
and 17 th(Cl,Br,I) in the periodic table . .
Lighter transition elements in low oxidation
state and heavier transition elements ,say Cu+ ,
Ag+,Hg+,Pt2+,Pd2+ etc. act as class (b) acids.
7. Ahrland , Chatt and Davies
Ahrland, Chatt, and Davies explained the class a and class
Class A Borderline Class B
H+, Li+ ,Na+, K+ Fe2+ Co2+ Ni2+ Cu+,Ag+,Au+,TI+
Be2+,Mg2+,
Ca2+
Cu2+ ,Zn2+,Pb2+ Hg+,Pd2+,Cd2+,
Cr2+,Cr3+,Al3+ SO2,BBr3 Pt2+,Hg2+,BH3,
Br2
SO3,BF3,BCl3 Br+, SO3,BF3,BCl3
HX(H-bonding) M0 (metal atoms) and
bulk metals
HX(H-bonding)
8. Class A
Acceptor atoms are marked by:
Class B
Acceptor atoms are marked by:
1) Small size 1) Large size
2) High positive oxidation state. 2) Zero or low positive oxidation
state
3) Absence of any outer electrons
Which are easily excited to
higher States.
3) Presence of several excitable
valence shell electrons.
4) Absence of d-electrons. 4) With nearly full d-electrons.
5) Usually light metal ions. 5) Mostly heavy metal ions.
6) Know as Lewis acids which
Are not easily polarizable Prefer
to coordinate with hard
6 6) Known as Lewis acids and
are easily polarizable. Prefer to
coordinate with soft bases.
10. Hard Soft
1) High electronegativity. 1) Low electronegativity
2) Low polarisability. 2) High Polarisability.
3) Presence of filled orbits
; empty orbitals may exist
at high energy level.
3) Partially filled orbitals,
empty orbitals are low-
lying.
4) These are anions or
neutral molecule known as
Lewis bases or ligands,
prefer to co-ordinate with
hard acids.
4) these are anions or neutral
molecules called similarly as
Lewis bases or ligands,
prefer to bind with soft
acids.
11. PEARSON’S CONCEPT
In 1963 R. G. Pearson extended and
generalized the qualitative correlation
between Lewis acids and Lewis bases
by classifying them into two
categories Hard and Soft.
12. The class –‘a’ metals which are small and less polarizable,
prefer to combine with non- metals or ligands which are also
small and not very polarizable , pearson called such metals as
Hard Acids and the corresponding ligands as hard Bases.
the class ‘b’metals having large size ,more or easily polarisable,
prefers to combine with non-metals or ligands having similar
properties Pearson called such metals as soft acids and the
ligands as soft base
The attempt of classification of acidsand bases as hard
and soft by Pearson is known as Hard and soft Acids and
Bases .(HSAB) or pearson’s concept
13. Hard
metals which are small and
less polarizable, prefer to
combine with non- metals
or ligands which are also
small and not very
polarizable , pearson called
such metals as Hard Acids
and the corresponding
ligands as Hard Bases.
Soft
’metals having large size
,more or easily
polarisable, prefers to
combine with non-metals
or ligands having similar
properties Pearson called
such metals as soft acids
and the ligands as soft
base
The attempt of classification of acidsand bases as hard
and soft by Pearson is known as Hard and soft Acids and
Bases .(HSAB) or pearson’s concept
14. Theorotical basis of hardness and softness
Several theories have been given to explain the
stability of complexes Formed by hard-hard and
soft-soft interactions. Some important theories are:
(a) Ionic and covalent bond theory
(b) - Bonding theory
(c) Pitzer’s theory
15. Ionic bond is formed
by the interaction of
hard acids and hard
bases
(a) Ionic and covalent bond theory
Covalent bond is formed by
the interaction of soft acids
and soft bases.
Electrostatic force of
attraction
Internulcear distance is
smaller
Highly stable
soft acids and soft bases have
larger size.
polarization effects
stronger covalent bond
high polarization
16. (b) -Π Bonding theory :
Mulliken (1955) and chatt (1956)
soft –soft interaction on the basis of π –bonding
Soft acids have low oxidation state and have a
large number of d- electrons.
strong tendency to form π –bonds
The polarization of soft acids and soft base also
favour π-bonding.
17. (c) Pitzer’s theory :
London dispersion energies stabilize a bond
between two large polarizable atom
These energies increase with an increase in the size
and polarizability .
soft-soft interactions are more stable as compared to
soft-hard interaction.
18. Hard and Soft Acids and Bases
The polarizability of an acid or base
plays a role in its reactivity. Hard acids and
bases are small, compact, and non-
polarizable.
Soft acids and bases are larger, with a
more diffuse distribution of electrons.
19. Hard and Soft Acids and Bases
In addition to their intrinsic strength,
Hard acids react preferentially with hard
bases, and soft acids react preferentially with
soft bases.
21. Solubility of Lithium Halides
LiBr> LiCl> LiI> LiF
LiF should have a higher ∆solv than the
other salts, yet it is the least soluble in water.
This is due to the strong hard acid (Li+)/hard
base (F-) interaction.
22. Thiocyanate Bonding
SCN- displays linkage isomerism as the
ligand coordinates to metals via the sulfur or
the nitrogen. Mercury (II) ion bonds to the
sulfur (a soft-soft interaction) whereas zinc ion
bonds to the nitrogen atom.
23. K for ligand exchange reactions
Compare:
[MeHg(H2O)]+ + HCl MeHgCl + H3O+
K= 1.8 x 1012
[MeHg(H2O)]+ + HF MeHgF + H3O+
K= 4.5 x 10-2
24.
25. Hard and Soft Acids & Bases
There have been many attempts to
categorize various metal ions and anions to
predict reactivity, solubility, etc.
R.G. Pearson (1963) categorized acids and
bases as either hard or soft (using Kf values).
Hard acids bond in the order: F->Cl->Br->I-
Soft acids bond in the order: I- >Br- >Cl- > F-
26. Hard and Soft Acids & Bases
Hard acids or bases are compact, with the
electrons held fairly tightly by the nucleus.
They are not very polarizable. F- is a hard
base, and metal ions such as Li+, a hard acid.
27. Hard and Soft Acids & Bases
Large, highly polarizable ions are
categorized as “soft.” Iodide is a soft base,
and transition metals with low charge density,
such as Ag+, are considered to be soft acids.
28. Hard and Soft Acids & Bases
Hard acids tend to bind to hard bases.
Soft acids tend to bind to soft bases.
29. • Predict the solubility (high or low) of silver
fluoride, silver iodide, lithium fluoride and
lithium iodide using the hard-soft acid/base
approach. Identify each Lewis acid and Lewis
base, and categorize each as hard or soft.
30. Charge Density – Hard Acids
Hard acids typically have a high charge
density. They are often metal ions with a
(higher) positive charge and small ionic size.
Their d orbitals are often unavailable to
engage in π bonding.
31. Charge Density – Soft Acids
Soft acids typically have lower charge
Their d orbitals are available for π bonding.
Soft acids are often 2nd and 3rd row transition
metals with a +1 or +2 charge, and filled or
nearly filled d orbitals.
36. Effect of Linkage Site
SCN- vs. NCS-
The nitrogen tends to coordinate with
harder acids such as Si, whereas the sulfur
tends to coordinate with softer acids such as
Pt2+.
37. Effect of Oxidation Number
Cu2+/Cu+ on acid hardness
SO3/SO2 on acid hardness
NO3
-/NO2
- on base hardness
SO4
2-/SO3
2- on base hardness
38. Acid or Base Strength
It is important to realize that hard/soft
considerations have nothing to do with acid or
base strength. An acid or a base may be hard
or soft and also be either weak or strong.
In a competition reaction between two
bases for the same acid, you must consider
both the relative strength of the bases, and
the hard/soft nature of each base and the
acid.
39. Acid or Base Strength
Consider the reaction between ZnO and
LiC4H9.
ZnO + 2 LiC4H9↔ Zn(C4H9)2 + Li2O
Zinc ion is a strong Lewis acid, and oxide
ion is a strong Lewis base.
40. Acid or Base Strength
Consider the reaction between ZnO and
LiC4H9.
ZnO + 2 LiC4H9↔ Zn(C4H9)2 + Li2O
Zinc ion is a strong Lewis acid, and oxide
ion is a strong Lewis base. However, the
reaction proceeds to the right (K>1), because
hard/soft considerations override acid-base
strength considerations.
soft -hard hard -soft soft -soft hard -hard
41. The Nature of the Adduct
Hard acid/hard base adducts tend to have
more ionic character in their bonding. These
are generally more favored energetically.
Soft acid/soft base adducts are more
covalent in nature.
42. • As the adduct forms, there is usually a change
in geometry around the Lewis acid site.
BX3 + N(CH3)3 X3B-NMe3
The stability of the adduct is:
BBr3 > BCl3> BF3
This order seems opposite of what would
be expected based on halogen size or
electronegativity.
43. Other Considerations
empty 2p orbital
filled orbitals
The reactivity pattern
suggests some degree of
π bonding in BF3.
44. Other Considerations
• Steric factors can play a role. An example is
the unfavorable reaction between :N(C6H5)3
and BCl3. The large phenyl groups interact
with the chlorine atoms on boron to
destabilize the product.
45. Applications of Hard/Soft Theory
The Qual Scheme, a series of chemical
reactions used to separate and identify the
presence of dozens of metal ions, is based
largely on the hard and soft properties of the
metal ions.
The softer metals are precipitated out as
chlorides or sulfides, with the harder ions
formed as carbonates.
46.
47. Evidence in Nature
In geochemistry, the elements in the
earth’s crust are classified as lithophiles or
chalcophiles.
The lithophile elements are typically found
as silicates (bonded via the O atom): Li+, Mg2+,
Ti3+, Al3+ and Cr2+,3+. These are hard Lewis
acids.
48. Evidence in Nature
The chalcophile elements are typically
found as sulfides or bonded to Se2- or Te2-.
They include: Cd2+, Pb2+, Sb3+, and Bi3+. These
are soft Lewis acids. Zinc ion, which is
borderline, is typically found as a sulfide.