HAMMOND’S POSTULATES
DR.AMBEDKARCOLLEGE
PRESENTED BY
SACHIN KENDRE
MSC SEM-I
FACULTY OF CHEMISTRY
TRANSITION STATE
• Transition state are highly unstable, in which only partial bonds are present. Due to unstability transition state cannot be
isolated.
• In T.S Nor all bonds are bonds are formed or all bonds are braked, due to which T.S. Is unstable.
• A2 + B2 2AB
• So we can say that,
Transition state :- unstable, non isolate compound formed as bonds are broken and made
(Reactan
t)
(Product
)
A A
B B
Bond break
Bond formation
A
B
A
B
+
A A
B B
HISTORY
• In 1955 George Hammond's, a young professor at low state university, postulated that
transition- state theory could be use to qualitatively explain the observed structure-
reactivity relationship. Notably, john e, Leffler of Florida state university proposed a similar
idea in 1953.
HAMMOND’S POSTULATE
• Hamond’s postulate ( or alternatively the Hammond‘s-Leffler postulate), is a
hypothesis in physical organic chemistry which describes the geometric structure
of the transition state in an organic chemical reaction.
• The Hammond’s postulate state that,
‘The transition state of a reaction resembles the structure of the species ( reactant or
product) to which it is closer in energy’
• It means known we can predict the geometric structure of a transition state by
comparing its energy to the species neighboring it along the reaction coordinate.
EXOTHERMIC REACTION
• If the reaction is exothermic the transition state is reached relatively early on
the reaction coordinate . bond breaking and bond forming has not occurred to
a large extent. And the structure of the transition state resembles the reactant
more than the product.
• Therefore, the transition state will be more geometrically similar to the
reactants than to the products.
EXOTHERMIC REACTION
• The transition state resembles the reactants.
ENDOTHERMIC REACTION
• Bond breaking (in the reactant) and bond formation (in the product) has
occurred to a large extent and the structure of the transition state is more like
that of the product than the reactant.
• So, according to Hammond’s postulate the structure of the transition state
would resemble the products more than the reactants.
ENDOTHERMIC REACTION
• The transition state resembles the
products.
SOME APPLICATION OF HAMMOND
POSTULATE,
 Easily explain the relationship between the rate of a reaction and the stability of
the products.
 Application on electrophilic addition reactions which proceed through the
formation of carbocation which formed by protonation of an alkene is an
endergonic step.
 Explain the selectivity of product formation during bromination and chlorination
of alkanes.
 Useful in rationalizing the SN
1 mechanism of alkyl halides which proceeds
through the formation of carbocation as an intermediate.
APPLICATION OF THE HAMMOND’S POSTULATE
TO THE SN
1 REACTION
• Since CH3
+ is less stable than (CH3)3C+
• En [1] > En [2]
• Reaction [1] is slower
Fig.
Energy diagram for carbocation
formation in two different SN
1
reactions
PREDICTING THE MECHANISM OF
NUCLEOPHILIC SUBSTITUTIONS
REACTIONS
• Four factors are relevant in predicting whether a given reaction is likely to proceed by an SN
1 or
an SN
2 mechanism.
• The alkyl halide : CH3X, RCH2X, R2CHX, OR R3CX
• The nucleophile: strong or weak
• The leaving group: good or poor
• The solvent: protic or aprotic
NATURE OF THE ALKYL HALIDE
• THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTOR IS THE IDENTITY OF THE ALKYL HALIDE.
• Increasing alkyl substitution favors SN
1
• Decreasing alkyl substitution favors SN
2
Increase rate of the SN
1 reaction
Increasing rate of SN
2 reaction
H
H
H
C X R
H
H
X
C
H
R
R
X
C
R
R
R C X
SN
1
Both
SN
1 and SN
2
SN
2
methyl 1
0
20 30
VINYL AND ARYL HALIDES
• SN
1 or SN
2 reaction occur on sp3 hybridized carbons.
• Vinyl and aryl halides. Which have a halogen attached to sp2 hybridized carbon, do not undergo SN
1 or
SN
2 reactions.
• Heterolysis of the C-X bond would form a highly unstable vinyl or aryl cation.
C C
X
X
C
C
H
H
H
Br
C
H
C
H
H Br-
+
A vinyl halide
A phenyl halide or aryl halide
sp hybridized
A vinyl carbocation
highly unstable
EFFECT OF THE NUCLEOPHILE
• Strong nucleophiles ( which usually bear a negative charge ) present in high concentration favor SN
2
reaction.
• Weak nucleophile, such as H2O and ROH favor SN
1 reactions by decreasing the rate of any
competing SN
2 reaction.
• Consider what happens when the 20 alkyl halide A, which can react by either mechanism, is treated
with the strong nucleophile HO- or the weak nucleophile H2O
OH
-
H2O
(Strong
nucleophile)
(Weak nucleophile)
CH3
Br
Cis-1-bromo-4-methyl-
cyclohexane
EFFECT OF LEAVING GROUPS
• A BETTER LEAVING GROUP INCREASES THE RATE OF BOTH SN
1 AND SN
2 REACTIONS.
Transition state of the
SN
2 mechanism
Transition state of the rate-
determining step of the SN
1
mechanism
A better leaving group is more able to accept the negative charge
Nu
-
C X
-
+
+
C X-
+
+
+
EFFECT OF SOLVENT
• Polar protic solvent like H2O and ROH favor SN
1 reaction because the ionic
intermediates (both cation and anions) are stabilized by solvation.
• Polar aprotic solvent favor SN
2reactions because nucleophiles are not well
solvated, and therefore, are more nucleophilic.
LIMITATION OF HAMMOND
POSTULATE
 The Hammond postulate makes a connection between rate
(kinetics) and equilibrium (thermodynamics) that has no
theoretical basis.
 Use of the Hammond postulate is based primarily on enthalpy
considerations and neglects the effects that activation entropies
can have on reaction rates.
 The Bronsted catalysis law ( an empirical linear free energy
relationship) is valid within carefully chosen groups of acid or
bases.
Hammonds postulates

Hammonds postulates

  • 1.
  • 2.
    TRANSITION STATE • Transitionstate are highly unstable, in which only partial bonds are present. Due to unstability transition state cannot be isolated. • In T.S Nor all bonds are bonds are formed or all bonds are braked, due to which T.S. Is unstable. • A2 + B2 2AB • So we can say that, Transition state :- unstable, non isolate compound formed as bonds are broken and made (Reactan t) (Product ) A A B B Bond break Bond formation A B A B + A A B B
  • 3.
    HISTORY • In 1955George Hammond's, a young professor at low state university, postulated that transition- state theory could be use to qualitatively explain the observed structure- reactivity relationship. Notably, john e, Leffler of Florida state university proposed a similar idea in 1953.
  • 4.
    HAMMOND’S POSTULATE • Hamond’spostulate ( or alternatively the Hammond‘s-Leffler postulate), is a hypothesis in physical organic chemistry which describes the geometric structure of the transition state in an organic chemical reaction. • The Hammond’s postulate state that, ‘The transition state of a reaction resembles the structure of the species ( reactant or product) to which it is closer in energy’ • It means known we can predict the geometric structure of a transition state by comparing its energy to the species neighboring it along the reaction coordinate.
  • 5.
    EXOTHERMIC REACTION • Ifthe reaction is exothermic the transition state is reached relatively early on the reaction coordinate . bond breaking and bond forming has not occurred to a large extent. And the structure of the transition state resembles the reactant more than the product. • Therefore, the transition state will be more geometrically similar to the reactants than to the products.
  • 6.
    EXOTHERMIC REACTION • Thetransition state resembles the reactants.
  • 7.
    ENDOTHERMIC REACTION • Bondbreaking (in the reactant) and bond formation (in the product) has occurred to a large extent and the structure of the transition state is more like that of the product than the reactant. • So, according to Hammond’s postulate the structure of the transition state would resemble the products more than the reactants.
  • 8.
    ENDOTHERMIC REACTION • Thetransition state resembles the products.
  • 9.
    SOME APPLICATION OFHAMMOND POSTULATE,  Easily explain the relationship between the rate of a reaction and the stability of the products.  Application on electrophilic addition reactions which proceed through the formation of carbocation which formed by protonation of an alkene is an endergonic step.  Explain the selectivity of product formation during bromination and chlorination of alkanes.  Useful in rationalizing the SN 1 mechanism of alkyl halides which proceeds through the formation of carbocation as an intermediate.
  • 10.
    APPLICATION OF THEHAMMOND’S POSTULATE TO THE SN 1 REACTION • Since CH3 + is less stable than (CH3)3C+ • En [1] > En [2] • Reaction [1] is slower Fig. Energy diagram for carbocation formation in two different SN 1 reactions
  • 11.
    PREDICTING THE MECHANISMOF NUCLEOPHILIC SUBSTITUTIONS REACTIONS • Four factors are relevant in predicting whether a given reaction is likely to proceed by an SN 1 or an SN 2 mechanism. • The alkyl halide : CH3X, RCH2X, R2CHX, OR R3CX • The nucleophile: strong or weak • The leaving group: good or poor • The solvent: protic or aprotic
  • 12.
    NATURE OF THEALKYL HALIDE • THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTOR IS THE IDENTITY OF THE ALKYL HALIDE. • Increasing alkyl substitution favors SN 1 • Decreasing alkyl substitution favors SN 2 Increase rate of the SN 1 reaction Increasing rate of SN 2 reaction H H H C X R H H X C H R R X C R R R C X SN 1 Both SN 1 and SN 2 SN 2 methyl 1 0 20 30
  • 13.
    VINYL AND ARYLHALIDES • SN 1 or SN 2 reaction occur on sp3 hybridized carbons. • Vinyl and aryl halides. Which have a halogen attached to sp2 hybridized carbon, do not undergo SN 1 or SN 2 reactions. • Heterolysis of the C-X bond would form a highly unstable vinyl or aryl cation. C C X X C C H H H Br C H C H H Br- + A vinyl halide A phenyl halide or aryl halide sp hybridized A vinyl carbocation highly unstable
  • 14.
    EFFECT OF THENUCLEOPHILE • Strong nucleophiles ( which usually bear a negative charge ) present in high concentration favor SN 2 reaction. • Weak nucleophile, such as H2O and ROH favor SN 1 reactions by decreasing the rate of any competing SN 2 reaction. • Consider what happens when the 20 alkyl halide A, which can react by either mechanism, is treated with the strong nucleophile HO- or the weak nucleophile H2O OH - H2O (Strong nucleophile) (Weak nucleophile) CH3 Br Cis-1-bromo-4-methyl- cyclohexane
  • 15.
    EFFECT OF LEAVINGGROUPS • A BETTER LEAVING GROUP INCREASES THE RATE OF BOTH SN 1 AND SN 2 REACTIONS. Transition state of the SN 2 mechanism Transition state of the rate- determining step of the SN 1 mechanism A better leaving group is more able to accept the negative charge Nu - C X - + + C X- + + +
  • 16.
    EFFECT OF SOLVENT •Polar protic solvent like H2O and ROH favor SN 1 reaction because the ionic intermediates (both cation and anions) are stabilized by solvation. • Polar aprotic solvent favor SN 2reactions because nucleophiles are not well solvated, and therefore, are more nucleophilic.
  • 17.
    LIMITATION OF HAMMOND POSTULATE The Hammond postulate makes a connection between rate (kinetics) and equilibrium (thermodynamics) that has no theoretical basis.  Use of the Hammond postulate is based primarily on enthalpy considerations and neglects the effects that activation entropies can have on reaction rates.  The Bronsted catalysis law ( an empirical linear free energy relationship) is valid within carefully chosen groups of acid or bases.