An Experimental Investigation on Strengths Characteristics of Concrete with the Partial Replacement of Cement by Mineral Admixture

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 10 | Oct -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 6.171 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1417
An Experimental Investigation on Strengths Characteristics of Concrete
with the Partial Replacement of Cement by
Mineral Admixture
Prof. Mallesh M1, Abhilash K2
1Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, UBDT College, KA, INDIA
2PG Student, Department of Civil Engineering, UBDT College, KA, INDIA
---------------------------------------------------------------------***----------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract: In this investigation, incomplete supplanting of
bond with Fly-Ash, Marble Powder and there mixes is
considered. Exploratory examination is led to assess the
quality attributes of solidified cement. Properties of cement
have been surveyed by incompletely supplanting bond with
Mineral admixture. The bond has been supplanted by
mineral admixture in like manner in the scope of 0%, 5%,
10%, 15%, 20% , 25% and 30% by weight of concrete for
M20 review blend. Solid 3D squares were threw and tried
following 7 days and 28 days curing for compressive quality
and contrasted and the customary solid examples. With the
goal that ideal level of Mineral admixture are to be
resolved.
Keywords: Fly Ash, Marble P0wder, OPC, C0mpressive
strength.
I. INTR0DUCTION
A huge number of huge amounts of concrete is utilized
each year that unfavorably influences condition. Bond is
additionally a critical building material for foundation
improvement. Concrete can be appropriately supplanted
with ease thus called squander materials like fly fiery
debris, marble clean, silica exhaust and so on favoring
condition and sparing bond. The utilization of fly fiery
remains and bagasse cinder in concrete has gotten huge
consideration over late years because of ecological
concerns in regards to its transfer and potential for use as
a cementitious material with its capacity to give critical
advantages to concrete.
II. MATERIALS AND METH0DOL0GY
Cement
In the current trial consider Ultra tech 43 review OPC is
utilized for all solid blends. The concrete utilized was new
and with no protuberances. The testing of concrete was
done according to IS: 8112-1989.
Table 1: Test results 0f 0PC 43 grade Cement
Fine Aggregate
Locally accessible normal waterway Sand is utilized as
Fine totals. Sand having fineness modulus 3.23 and
affirmed to reviewing zone-II according to May be: 383-
1970 proposal. Sifter investigation of Sand is arranged
underneath.
Table 2: Test results of Fine Aggregate
C0arse Aggregate
The pulverized stone totals were gathered from the
nearby quarry. 20 mm down and 12.5 mm down size are
utilized as coarse totals in this investigation . Both 20 mm
down and 12.5 mm down size totals are mixed in measure
up to extent and tried according to IS:383-1970 to shape
20 mm all around reviewed totals. Strainer examination of
Coarse total as arranged underneath.
Table 2: Test results 0f C0arse Aggregate

Water
Water is an essential constituent of concrete as it
effectively takes an interest in the substance response
with bond. Since it frames quality giving bond gel, the
amount and nature of water is required to be looked
painstakingly
Consumable water is by and large thought to be
tasteful for blending and curing of cement. Additionally
PH estimation of water should at least 6. The water
utilized for giving curing ought to fulfill a role according to
IS 456-2000..
Fly Ash
Fly powder, for the most part called "beat fuel
scorching garbage" in the United Kingdom, is one of the
coal bursting things, made out of the fine particles that are
driven out of the evaporator with the pipe gasses. Powder
that falls in the base of the evaporator is called base
bursting remains. In display day coal-finished power
plants, fly blasting junk is for the most part gotten by
electrostatic precipitators or other molecule filtration
gear before the vent gasses go to the smokestacks.
Together with base residue removed from the base of the
pot, it is known as coal blasting remains. Subordinate
upon the source and magnificence mind results of the coal
being singed, the areas of fly ash move broadly, however
all fly blasting remains unites liberal measures of silicon
dioxide (SiO2) (both will characterized and crystalline),
aluminum oxide (Al2O3) and calcium oxide (CaO), the
rule mineral mixes in coal-bearing rock strata.
Marble P0wder
Marble is an alterable shake that produced using
limestone. Most by a wide margin of the material is calcite
(a crystalline kind of calcium carbonate, CaCO3) and
dolomite. It is frequently utilized for figure, as a building
material, and for some remarkable purposes. "Marble" is
besides utilized for different stones that can be cleaned
well and for ball surrounded things utilized for kid
redirections. 'Fake marble' is a divider painting technique
that impersonates the shading instances of ensured
marble (not to be stirred up for paper marbling). Marble
clean can be converged with concrete or planned tars to
make reconstituted or refined marble. Marble has been
utilized as a bit of change for innumerable. It was
exhaustively utilized by Greek and Roman stone masters
and modelers. Spots named after the stone solidify.
Marble Arch, London; the Sea of Marmara; India's
Marble Rocks; and the towns of Marble, Minnesota;
Marble, Colorado; and Marble Hill, Manhattan, New York.
The Elgin Marbles are marble models from the Parthenon
that are in plain view in the British Museum. They were
passed on to Britain by the Earl of Elgin.
Bagasse Ash
Bagasse is the stringy issue that outstanding parts
after sugarcane or sorghum stalks are crushed to isolate
their juice. It is dry thick store left after the extraction of
juice from sugar stick. Bagasse is utilized as a biofuel and
in the create of squash and building materials.
III.METHODOLOGY
Experimental 0verview
In introduce examination, incomplete supplanting of
bond with Fly Ash, Marble Powder, Bagasse Ash and there
blends are considered. Test examine is directed to assess
the quality attributes of solidified cement. Properties of
cement have been surveyed by incompletely supplanting
concrete with Fly Ash, Marble Powder, Bagasse Ash and
there blends. The concrete has been supplanted by
Mineral Admixture in like manner in the scope of 0%, 5%,
10%, 15%, 20% , 25% and 30% by weight of bond for
M20 review blend. Solid 3D shapes were threw and tried
following 7 days and 28 days curing for compressive
quality and contrasted and the traditional solid examples.
Solid 3D squares were threw in light of Mix
proportions . The Coarse totals and Fine totals were first
combined for around 3 minutes and Cement is added to
influence dry to blend. Water is then added to dry blend
and kept blending for assist 3-4 minutes until the point
when satisfactory blending was finished. The crisp cement
was then thrown in 3 layers to a solid form of size
150x150x150 mm instantly subsequent to blending
immediately. Each layer is packed 25 strokes with packing
bar and furthermore compacting is finished with vibrator
for sufficient compaction. Along these lines the melds
were all around compacted and top surface is done
smooth. The threw 3D shapes were left undisturbed in lab
alongside form for 24 hours. At that point the solid shapes
were remoulded following 24 hours and were placed in
curing tank for 28 days of curing.

The Experimental work is partitioned in to 5 Iterations.
Every cycle has swap for Cement by fluctuating the
Mineral Admixture Replacement for Cement in the range
0% to 30%.
Testing Pr0cedure
Out of many test led for Concrete, Compressive
Strength test is the most vital test which gives a thought
regarding all qualities of Concrete. By this single test we
can judge that satisfactory amount of materials are
utilized or not and climate cementing has been done
legitimately or not.
For the test Concrete shape of size 150 x 150 x 150 mm
were utilized. These examples are tried following 7 and
28 days of curing. The example is place with the end goal
that best surface of shape should confronting front in the
level plate of compressive testing machine. Step by step
apply the heap until disappointment of example. Load at
disappointment isolated by region of example gives the
compressive quality of that example. This is rehashed for
different 3D shapes. Least 3 solid shapes were tried for
each trail and normal of these should considered. Test
strategy completed as per IS: 516-1959 proposals.
IV.RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The Concrete blocks of various substitution extent were
subjected to Compressive quality test and results
acquired from test are arranged and the comparing charts
were plotted to break down the variety of quality.
The Compressive quality consequences of 7 days and
28 days are arranged for various swap proportions for
M20 Grade solid blend. The outcomes are classified as
changing supplanting for sand with confined trade for
bond.
Table 3: Compressive strength of concrete –when
Cement is replaced with Fly-Ash
DESIGNATION OF
CUBE
7 Days
C0mpressive
Strength
28 Days
C0mpressive
Strength
0% Fly Ash 23.11 33.18
5% Fly Ash 26.37 36.00
10% Fly Ash 27.15 37.32
15% Fly Ash 28.21 38.93
20% Fly Ash 26.42 34.59
25% Fly Ash 23.76 31.87
Fig 1: Graph sh0wing variati0n 0f C0mpressive
strength 0f c0ncrete f0r Replacement 0f Cement with
Fly Ash
It is 0bserved that fr0m the Table 3 and Fig 1, When Fly
Ash is supplanted f0r Cement is d0ne f0r 0%, 5%, 10%,
15%, 20% and 25%. The variati0n 0f 7 days C0mpressive
Strength as 0%(C0ntr0l solid shape), +14.1%, +17.5%,
+22.07%, +14.32%, +2.81% individually when c0mpared
t0 comes about 0f c0nventi0nal c0ncrete 0f M 20 blend. It
is als0 0bserved that the variati0n 0f 28 days
C0mpressive Strength as 0% (C0ntr0l solid shape), +8.5%,
+12.47%, +17.33%, +4.25%, - 3.95% individually when
c0mpared t0 comes about 0f c0nventi0nal c0ncrete 0f
M20 blend.
Table 4: C0mpressive strength 0f c0ncrete –when
DESIGNATION OF
CUBE
7 Days
C0mpressive
Strength
28 Days
C0mpressive
Strength
0% Marble P0wder 23.11 33.18
5% Marble P0wder 24.87 35.49
10% Marble
P0wder
26.57 36.71
15% Marble
P0wder
28.01 38.15
20% Marble
P0wder
25.97 36.22
25% Marble
P0wder
22.38 29.67

Fig 2: Graph showing variati0n 0f C0mpressive
strength 0f c0ncrete f0r Replacement 0f Marble
p0wder with Cement
It is watched that from the Table 4 and Fig 2, When
Marble Powder is traded for Cement is improved the
situation 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 25%. The variety
of 7 days Compressive Strength as 0%(Control 3D square),
+7.61%, +14.75%, +21.2%, +12.37%, - 3.16% individually
when contrasted with consequences of customary cement
of M 20 blend. It is likewise watched that the variety of 28
days Compressive Strength as 0% (Control 3D square),
+6.96%, +10.64%, +14.98%, +9.16%, - 10.58% separately
when contrasted with consequences of customary cement
of M20 blend.
DESIGNATION OF
CUBE
7 Days
C0mpressive
Strength
28 Days
C0mpressive
Strength
0% Bagasse ash 23.11 33.18
5% Bagasse ash 26.81 36.15
10% Bagasse ash 27.52 37.87
15% Bagasse ash 28.37 38.76
20% Bagasse ash 26.09 33.94
25% Bagasse ash 22.53 30.52
strength 0f c0ncrete f0r Replacement 0f Cement with
Bagasse ash
Bagasse Ash is traded for Cement is improved the
situation o%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 25%. The variety
of 7 days Compressive Strength as 0%(Control 3D shape),
+16.01%, +19.08%, +22.76%, +12.89%, - 2.5% separately
when contrasted with aftereffects of customary cement of
M20 blend. It is likewise watched that the variety of 28
days Compressive Strength as 0% (Control shape),
+8.95%, +14.13%, +16.82%, +2.3%, - 8.02% individually
when contrasted with aftereffects of customary cement of
M20 blend.
cement is replaced with the c0mbination 0f Fly Ash
and Mable P0wder
DESIGNATION OF
CUBE
7 Days
C0mpressive
Strength
28 Days
C0mpressive
Strength
0% Fly Ash
0% Marble P0wder
23.11 33.18
5% Fly Ash
0% Marble P0wder
26.37 36.00
5% Fly Ash
5% Marble P0wder
27.11 37.48
10% Fly Ash
5% Marble P0wder
28.00 39.4
10% Fly Ash
10% Marble
P0wder
23.41 39.7
15% Fly Ash
10% Marble
P0wder
18.52 29.78
15% Fly Ash
15% Marble
P0wder
13.93 26.22
strength 0f c0ncrete f0r Replacement 0f Fly Ash and
Marble P0wder with Cement
It is watched that from the Table 6 and Fig 4, When Fly
Ash and Marble Powder is substituted for Cement is
improved the situation 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and

30%. The variety of 7 days Compressive Strength as
0%(Control 3D square), +14.1%, +17.3%, +21.16%,
+1.3%, - 19.86%, - 39.72% individually when contrasted
with consequences of traditional cement of M 20 blend. It
is likewise watched that the variety of 28 days
Compressive Strength as 0% (Control block), +8.5%,
+12.96%, +18.77%, +19.66%, - 10.24%, - 20.97%
separately when contrasted with consequences of
traditional cement of M 20 blend.
cement is replaced with the c0mbination 0f Bagasse
ash and Mable P0wder
DESIGNATION OF
CUBE
7 Days
Compressive
Strength
28 Days
Compressive
Strength
0% Bagasse ash
0% Marble P0wder
23.11 33.18
5% Bagasse ash
0% Marble P0wder
26.81 36.15
5% Bagasse ash
5% Marble P0wder
28.15 37.48
10% Bagasse ash
5% Marble P0wder
29.04 39.26
10% Bagasse ash
10% Marble
P0wder
25.18 39.49
15% Bagasse ash
10% Marble
P0wder
18.81 31.85
15% Bagasse ash
15% Marble
P0wder
14.51 27.11
Fig 5: Graph sh0wing variati0n 0f Compressive
strength 0f c0ncrete f0r Replacement 0f Bagasse ash
and Marble P0wder with Cement
Bagasse Ash and Marble Powder is substituted for Cement
is improved the situation 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%
and 30%. The variety of 7 days Compressive Strength as
0%(Control 3D shape), +16.01%, +21.81%, +25.66%,
+8.96%, - 18.6%, - 37.21% separately when contrasted
with aftereffects of traditional cement of M 20 blend. It is
additionally watched that the variety of 28 days
Compressive Strength as 0% (Control 3D shape), +8.95%,
+12.96%, 18.32%, +19.02%, - 4.00%, - 18.29%
individually when contrasted with consequences of
regular cement of M 20 blend..
Table 8: Optimum C0mpressive strength 0f c0ncrete
f0r 28 days 0f curing
Sl
n0
DESIGNATION OF CUBE 28 Days
C0mpressive
Strength
1 15% Fly Ash 38.93
2 15% Bagasse Ash 38.76
3 15% Marble P0wder 38.15
4
10% Fly ash
10% Marble P0wder 39.7
5
10% Bagasse ash
10% Marble P0wder 39.46
Fig 6: Graph showing 0ptimum C0mpressive strength
0f C0ncrete for 28 days 0f curing
It is watched that from the Table 8 and Fig 6, The ideal
swap proportion for M20 review solid blend has for
substitution of Cement by 10% of Fly Ash and 10% of
Marble Powder, which gives almost 20% more
Compressive quality than the consequences of customary
cement of M20 blend for 28 Days of curing.
V. CONCLUSIONS
Conduct of Concrete by halfway substitution of Cement
by Fly Ash, Bagasse Ash, Marble Powder and there blends
were considered. From the outcomes the accompanying
Conclusions were drawn.
With this investigation, the mean target quality of M 20
review concrete is accomplished with the Fly Ash, Marble
Powder and joined impact of utilizing Fly Ash and Marble
Powder.

By this examination, the ideal substitution proportion
for M20 review solid blend are substitution of Cement by
15% of Fly Ash, which gives about 18% more
Compressive quality than the aftereffects of traditional
cement of M20 blend.
15% of Bagasse fiery remains, which gives almost 18%
more Compressive quality than the aftereffects of
customary cement of M20 blend.
By this examination, the ideal swap proportion for M20
review solid blend are substitution of Cement by 15% of
Marble Powder, which gives about 15% more
Compressive quality than the consequences of ordinary
cement of M20 blend.
By this examination, the ideal trade proportion for M20
review solid blend are substitution of Cement by 10% of
Fly Ash and 10% of Marble Powder, which gives about
20% more Compressive quality than the consequences of
customary cement of M20 blend.
10% of Bagasse fiery debris and 10% of Marble Powder,
which gives almost 20% more Compressive quality than
the consequences of regular cement of M20 blend.
This exploratory investigation has ended up being
better approach to transfer of mechanical result and
waste, for example, Fly Ash and Marble Powder.
SCOPE FOR FURTHER STUDY
The further research w0rk can be carried 0ut 0n
f0ll0wing t0pics bel0w
1. The same exploratory work can be conveyed out
on other higher evaluations of Concrete.
2. The exploratory work can be conveyed out by
changing other substitution materials and there
combinations for Cement.
3. Other Strength tests like Split pliable test and
Flexural tests can be conveyed out.
REFERENCES
1. Baboo Rai, et.al (2011) Influence of Marble
powder/granules in Concrete mix. ISSN 0976 –
4399,PP 827-834.
2. BaharDemirel (2010), “ The effect of the using waste
granite dust as fine Sand on the mechanical
properties of the concrete” , International Journal of
the Physical Sciences, vol. 5,pp. 1372-1380.
3. B B Patel and M. Neelamegam ‘Effect of fly ash on the
Durability and performance of concrete’ The Indian
concrete journal(Nov 2012).
4. Bilodeau, A., Carette, G.G., Malhotra, V.M., and Langly,
W.S., "Influence of Curing and Drying on Salt Scaling
Resistance of Fly Ash Concrete", Proceedings of the
Second International Conference on Concrete
Durability, August 4-9, 1991, Montreal, Canada, Vol.
1, ACI Special Publication No. SP-126, 1991, pp. 201-
228.
5. BouzianiTayeb,Abraham and Isac A. (2011), “Effect
of Granite Powder on the Properties of Self-
Compacting Sand Concrete”, The Open Construction
and Building Technology Journal, vol. 5, pp.25-29.
6. HanifiBinici, Hasan Kaplan and Salih Yilmaz, (2007),
"Influence Of Marble And Limestone Dusts As
Additives On Some Mechanical Properties Of
Concrete," Scientific Research and Essay, 2(9), pp
372379.
7. Hussein, A.A.E., Shafiq, N. and Nuruddin, M.F. 2013. A
comprehensive experimental study on the
performance of fly ash concrete. Int. J. Engg. Adv.
Technol. 2(6): 135-142.
8. Hwang, K.R., Noguchi, T. and Tomosawa, F. 1998.
Effects of fine aggregate replacement on the rheology,
compressive strength and carbonation properties of
fly ash and mortar. ACI Spec. Publ. (178): 401-410.
9. Jayminkumar A. Patel & Dr. D. B. Raijiwala, Use of
Sugar Cane Bagasse Ash as Partial Replacement of
Cement in Concrete – An Experimental Study Global
Journal of Researches in Engineering: J General
Engineering Volume 15 Issue 5 Version 1.0 Year
2015
10. Manju Pawar et.al (2014) Feasibility and need of use
of waste marble powder in concrete production. ISSN
No. 2349-943435.PP 1-6.
11. J. Prabakar, P. Devadas Manoharan and M.
Neelamegam ‘Effect of fly ash on the Durability and
performance of concrete’ The Indian concrete
journal(Nov 2011).
12. M.G. Shaikh, S.A. Daimi ‘Durability studies of concrete
made by using artificial sand with dust and natural
sand’ International Journal of Earth Sciences and
Engineering ISSN 0974 - 5904, vol. 04, No.06 SPL, Oct
2011, p 823-825.
13. Mohammad S. Al-Juhani and Ahmed N.
Bdour, ”Utilization Of Waste Marble Powder In
Cement Industry”, December 2011,Associate
Professor, Civil Engineering Department, College of
Engineering, University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia

Corresponding Author Dean, College of Engineering,
University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.
14. Mrs.U.R.Kawade, Mr.V.R.Rathi, Miss.Vaishali D. Girge ,
Associate Professor, P.D.V.V.P, College of
Engineering,Ahmednagar, Maharashtra-“ Effect of
use of Bagasse Ash on Strength of Concrete” Vol.2,
Issue-7, July(2013).
15. P.A. Shirule et.al (2012) Partial Replacement of
Cement with Marble Dust Powder. International
Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and
Studies E-ISSN2249–8974 IJAERS/Vol. I/ Issue
III/April-June, 2012/175-177.
16. ShahulHameed M &Sekar A.S.S (2009), “Chloride
Penetration Study on Self-Compacting Green
Concrete Using Crusher Rock Dust and granite
Sludge Powder asFine Aggregate”.ARPN Journal of
Engineering and Applied Sciences,vol. 3.
17. T. Felixkala, P. Partheeban, ‘Granite powder concrete’
Indian Journal of Science and Technology
vol.3,No.3(Mar 2010) ISSN: 0974-6846.
18. Vaidevi C (2013) Study on marble dust as partial
replacement of cement in concrete .ISSN 2319 –
7757.PP 14-16.
19. V.M.Shelke, Prof. P.Y.Pawde and Dr. R.R.Shrivastava ,
“Effect of marble powder with and without silica
fume on mechanical properties of concrete” IOSR
Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering
(IOSRJMCE) ISSN : 2278-1684 Volume 1, Issue 1.
20. M. SOUNTHARARAJAN AND A. SIVAKUMAR (2013) EFFECT OF
THE LIME CONTENT IN MARBLE POWDER FOR PRODUCING
HIGH STRENGTH CONCRETE .ISSN 1819-6608.PP 260-264.
21. BIS – IS 12269: 1999, “Specification for 53grade
ordinary Portland cement”, Bureau of Indian
Standard, New Delhi.
22. BIS –IS 383: 1970 “Specifications for Coarse and Fine
Aggregates from Natural Sources for Concrete”,
Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
23. BIS – IS 456: 2000, “Code of practice for plain and
reinforced concrete” (fourth revision), Bureau of
Indian Standard, New Delhi.
24. BIS – IS 10262: 2009, “Indian Standard,
recommended guidelines for concrete mix designs”,
Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
25. BIS – IS 516: 1959 “Methods of Tests for strength of
concrete”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

An Experimental Investigation on Strengths Characteristics of Concrete with the Partial Replacement of Cement by Mineral Admixture

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to An Experimental Investigation on Strengths Characteristics of Concrete with the Partial Replacement of Cement by Mineral Admixture

Similar to An Experimental Investigation on Strengths Characteristics of Concrete with the Partial Replacement of Cement by Mineral Admixture (20)

More from IRJET Journal

More from IRJET Journal (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

An Experimental Investigation on Strengths Characteristics of Concrete with the Partial Replacement of Cement by Mineral Admixture