Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details.

Successfully reported this slideshow.

Like this presentation? Why not share!

- Traffic Detection Systems (Transpor... by Hossam Shafiq I 652 views
- 05 Statistics for Traffic Engineeri... by Hossam Shafiq I 442 views
- 04 Traffic Stream Characteristics (... by Hossam Shafiq I 787 views
- 03 Roadways and Control (Traffic En... by Hossam Shafiq I 302 views
- Route Choice (Transportation Engine... by Hossam Shafiq I 268 views
- Lecture02(constants, variable & dat... by Dhaka University ... 2496 views

1,084 views

Published on

Geometric Design (Transportation Engineering)

Published in:
Engineering

No Downloads

Total views

1,084

On SlideShare

0

From Embeds

0

Number of Embeds

18

Shares

0

Downloads

53

Comments

0

Likes

5

No embeds

No notes for slide

Draw in stationing on each of these curves and explain it

PVI is at STA 102+00 and PVT is at STA 104+00

Elevation of the PVI is 59’ + 0.02(200) = 63 ft.

Elevation of the PVT is 63’ – 0.045(200) = 54 ft.

High point elevation requires figuring out the equation for a vertical curve

At x = 0, y = c =&gt; c=59 ft.

At x = 0, dY/dx = b = G1 = +2.0%

a = (G2 – G1)/2L = (-4.5 – 2)/(2(4)) = - 0.8125

y = -0.8125x2 + 2x + 59

High point is where dy/dx = 0

dy/dx = -1.625x + 2 = 0

x = 1.23 stations

Find elevation at x = 1.23 stations

y = -0.8125(1.23)2 + 2(1.23) + 59

y = 60.23 ft

G is in decimal, x is in stations

Another way to get min length is 3 x (design speed in mph)

Minimum lengths are about 100 to 300 ft.

Another way to get min length is 3 x design speed in mph

Must use S&lt;L equation, it’s a quadratic with roots of 146.17 ft and -64.14 ft.

The driver will see the tree when it is 146.17 feet in front of her.

Available SSD is 146.17 ft.

Required SSD = (1.47 x 30)2/2(32.2)(0.35 + 0) + 2.5(1.47 x 30) = 196.53 ft.

Therefore, she’s not going to stop in time.

OR

L/A = K = 150/6.4 = 23.43, which is less than the required K of 37 for a 30 mph design speed

Stopping sight distance on level ground at 30 mph is approximately 200 ft.

The driver will see the tree when it is 243.59 feet in front of her.

Available SSD = 243.59 ft.

Required SSD = (1.47 x 30)2/2(32.2)(0.35 + 0) + 2.5(1.47 x 30) = 196.53 ft.

Therefore, she will be able to stop in time.

OR

L/A = K = 150/6.4 = 23.43, which is greater than the required K of 19 for a 30 mph design speed on a crest vertical curve

Stopping sight distance on level ground at 30 mph is approximately 200 ft.

D = 5729.6/R. Therefore D = 3.82

L = 100(delta)/D = 100(29.86)/3.82 = 781 ft.

PC = PT – PI = 2000 – 781 = 12+18.2

PI = PC +T = 12+18.2 + 400 = 16+18.2.

Note: cannot find PI by subtracting T from PT!

Assume fse is small and can be neglected – it is the normal component of centripetal acceleration

Design values of fs are chosen somewhat below this maximum value so there is a margin of safety

WSDOT max e = 0.10

For 70 mph, WSDOT f = 0.10

Rv = V2/g(fs+e) = (70 x 1.47)2/32.2(0.10 + 0.10) = 1644.16 ft.

This is the radius to the center of the inside lane. Depending upon the number of lanes and perhaps a center divider, the actual centerline radius will be different.

Think of how the steering wheel works, it’s a change from zero angle to the angle of the turn in a finite amount of time

This can result in lane wander

Often make lanes bigger in turns to accommodate for this

- 1. CEE320 Winter2006 Geometric Design CEE 320 Steve Muench
- 2. CEE320 Winter2006 Outline 1. Concepts 2. Vertical Alignment a. Fundamentals b. Crest Vertical Curves c. Sag Vertical Curves d. Examples 3. Horizontal Alignment a. Fundamentals b. Superelevation 4. Other Non-Testable Stuff
- 3. CEE320 Winter2006 Concepts • Alignment is a 3D problem broken down into two 2D problems – Horizontal Alignment (plan view) – Vertical Alignment (profile view) • Stationing – Along horizontal alignment – 12+00 = 1,200 ft. Piilani Highway on Maui
- 4. CEE320 Winter2006 Stationing Horizontal Alignment Vertical Alignment
- 5. From Perteet Engineering
- 6. CEE320 Winter2006 Vertical Alignment
- 7. CEE320 Winter2006 Vertical Alignment • Objective: – Determine elevation to ensure • Proper drainage • Acceptable level of safety • Primary challenge – Transition between two grades – Vertical curves G1 G2 G1 G2 Crest Vertical Curve Sag Vertical Curve
- 8. CEE320 Winter2006 Vertical Curve Fundamentals • Parabolic function – Constant rate of change of slope – Implies equal curve tangents • y is the roadway elevation x stations (or feet) from the beginning of the curve cbxaxy ++= 2
- 9. CEE320 Winter2006 Vertical Curve Fundamentals G1 G2 PVI PVT PVC L L/2 δ cbxaxy ++= 2 x Choose Either: • G1, G2 in decimal form, L in feet • G1, G2 in percent, L in stations
- 10. CEE320 Winter2006 Relationships Choose Either: • G1, G2 in decimal form, L in feet • G1, G2 in percent, L in stations G1 G2 PVI PVT PVC L L/2 δ x 1and0:PVCAt the Gb dx dY x === cYx == and0:PVCAt the L GG a L GG a dx Yd 2 2:Anywhere 1212 2 2 − =⇒ − ==
- 11. CEE320 Winter2006 Example A 400 ft. equal tangent crest vertical curve has a PVC station of 100+00 at 59 ft. elevation. The initial grade is 2.0 percent and the final grade is -4.5 percent. Determine the elevation and stationing of PVI, PVT, and the high point of the curve. G1 =2.0% G 2 = - 4.5% PVI PVT PVC: STA 100+00 EL 59 ft.
- 12. G1 =2.0% G 2 = -4.5% PVI PVT PVC: STA 100+00 EL 59 ft.
- 13. CEE320 Winter2006 Other Properties G1 G2 PVI PVT PVC x Ym Yf Y 2 200 x L A Y = 800 AL Ym = 200 AL Yf = 21 GGA −= •G1, G2 in percent •L in feet
- 14. CEE320 Winter2006 Other Properties • K-Value (defines vertical curvature) – The number of horizontal feet needed for a 1% change in slope A L K = 1./ GKxptlowhigh =⇒
- 15. CEE320 Winter2006 Crest Vertical Curves G1 G2 PVI PVTPVC h2 h1 L SSD ( ) ( )2 21 2 22100 hh SSDA L + = ( ) ( ) A hh SSDL 2 21200 2 + −= For SSD < L For SSD > L Line of Sight
- 16. CEE320 Winter2006 Crest Vertical Curves • Assumptions for design – h1 = driver’s eye height = 3.5 ft. – h2 = tail light height = 2.0 ft. • Simplified Equations ( ) 2158 2 SSDA L = ( ) A SSDL 2158 2 −= For SSD < L For SSD > L
- 17. CEE320 Winter2006 Crest Vertical Curves • Assuming L > SSD… 2158 2 SSD K =
- 18. CEE320 Winter2006 Design Controls for Crest Vertical Curves from AASHTO’s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets 2001
- 19. CEE320 Winter2006 Design Controls for Crest Vertical Curves fromAASHTO’sAPolicyonGeometricDesignofHighwaysandStreets2001
- 20. CEE320 Winter2006 Sag Vertical Curves G1 G2 PVI PVTPVC h2=0h1 L Light Beam Distance (SSD) ( ) ( )βtan200 1 2 Sh SSDA L + = ( ) ( )( ) A SSDh SSDL βtan200 2 1 + −= For SSD < L For SSD > L headlight beam (diverging from LOS by β degrees)
- 21. CEE320 Winter2006 Sag Vertical Curves • Assumptions for design – h1 = headlight height = 2.0 ft. – β = 1 degree • Simplified Equations ( ) ( )SSD SSDA L 5.3400 2 + = ( ) ( ) + −= A SSD SSDL 5.3400 2 For SSD < L For SSD > L
- 22. CEE320 Winter2006 Sag Vertical Curves • Assuming L > SSD… SSD SSD K 5.3400 2 + =
- 23. CEE320 Winter2006 Design Controls for Sag Vertical Curves from AASHTO’s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets 2001
- 24. CEE320 Winter2006 Design Controls for Sag Vertical Curves fromAASHTO’sAPolicyonGeometricDesignofHighwaysandStreets2001
- 25. CEE320 Winter2006 Example 1 A car is traveling at 30 mph in the country at night on a wet road through a 150 ft. long sag vertical curve. The entering grade is -2.4 percent and the exiting grade is 4.0 percent. A tree has fallen across the road at approximately the PVT. Assuming the driver cannot see the tree until it is lit by her headlights, is it reasonable to expect the driver to be able to stop before hitting the tree?
- 26. CEE320 Winter2006 Example 2 Similar to Example 1 but for a crest curve. A car is traveling at 30 mph in the country at night on a wet road through a 150 ft. long crest vertical curve. The entering grade is 3.0 percent and the exiting grade is -3.4 percent. A tree has fallen across the road at approximately the PVT. Is it reasonable to expect the driver to be able to stop before hitting the tree?
- 27. CEE320 Winter2006 Example 3 A roadway is being designed using a 45 mph design speed. One section of the roadway must go up and over a small hill with an entering grade of 3.2 percent and an exiting grade of -2.0 percent. How long must the vertical curve be?
- 28. CEE320 Winter2006 Horizontal Alignment
- 29. CEE320 Winter2006 Horizontal Alignment • Objective: – Geometry of directional transition to ensure: • Safety • Comfort • Primary challenge – Transition between two directions – Horizontal curves • Fundamentals – Circular curves – Superelevation Δ
- 30. CEE320 Winter2006 Horizontal Curve Fundamentals R T PC PT PI M E R Δ Δ/2Δ/2 Δ/2 RR D π π 000,18 180 100 = = 2 tan ∆ = RT D RL ∆ =∆= 100 180 π L
- 31. CEE320 Winter2006 Horizontal Curve Fundamentals − ∆ = 1 2cos 1 RE ∆ −= 2 cos1RM R T PC PT PI M E R Δ Δ/2Δ/2 Δ/2 L
- 32. CEE320 Winter2006 Example 4 A horizontal curve is designed with a 1500 ft. radius. The tangent length is 400 ft. and the PT station is 20+00. What are the PI and PT stations?
- 33. CEE320 Winter2006 Superelevation cpfp FFW =+ αααα cossincossin 22 vv s gR WV gR WV WfW = ++ α α Fcp Fcn Wp Wn Ff Ff α Fc W 1 ft e ≈ Rv
- 34. CEE320 Winter2006 Superelevation αααα cossincossin 22 vv s gR WV gR WV WfW = ++ ( )αα tan1tan 2 s v s f gR V f −=+ ( )ef gR V fe s v s −=+ 1 2 ( )efg V R s v + = 2
- 35. CEE320 Winter2006 Selection of e and fs • Practical limits on superelevation (e) – Climate – Constructability – Adjacent land use • Side friction factor (fs) variations – Vehicle speed – Pavement texture – Tire condition
- 36. CEE320 Winter2006 Side Friction Factor from AASHTO’s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets 2004 New Graph
- 37. CEE320 Winter2006 Minimum Radius Tables New Table
- 38. CEE320 Winter2006 WSDOT Design Side Friction Factors fromthe2005WSDOTDesignManual,M22-01 New Table For Open Highways and Ramps
- 39. CEE320 Winter2006 WSDOT Design Side Friction Factors fromthe2005WSDOTDesignManual,M22-01 For Low-Speed Urban Managed Access Highways New Graph
- 40. CEE320 Winter2006 Design Superelevation Rates - AASHTO from AASHTO’s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets 2004 New Graph
- 41. CEE320 Winter2006 Design Superelevation Rates - WSDOT from the 2005 WSDOT Design Manual, M 22-01 emax = 8% New Graph
- 42. CEE320 Winter2006 Example 5 A section of SR 522 is being designed as a high-speed divided highway. The design speed is 70 mph. Using WSDOT standards, what is the minimum curve radius (as measured to the traveled vehicle path) for safe vehicle operation?
- 43. CEE320 Winter2006 Stopping Sight Distance Rv Δs Obstruction Ms( ) v s R SSD π 180 =∆ D RSSD s sv ∆ =∆= 100 180 π SSD −= v vs R SSD RM π 90 cos1 − = − v svv R MRR SSD 1 cos 90 π
- 44. CEE320 Winter2006 Supplemental Stuff • Cross section • Superelevation Transition – Runoff – Tangent runout • Spiral curves • Extra width for curves FYI – NOT TESTABLE
- 45. CEE320 Winter2006 Cross Section FYI – NOT TESTABLE
- 46. CEE320 Winter2006 Superelevation Transition from the 2001 Caltrans Highway Design Manual FYI – NOT TESTABLE
- 47. CEE320 Winter2006 Superelevation Transition from AASHTO’s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets 2001 FYI – NOT TESTABLE
- 48. CEE320 Winter2006 Superelevation Runoff/Runout fromAASHTO’sAPolicyonGeometricDesignofHighwaysandStreets2001 FYI – NOT TESTABLE
- 49. CEE320 Winter2006 Superelevation Runoff - WSDOT from the 2005 WSDOT Design Manual, M 22-01 FYI – NOT TESTABLE New Graph
- 50. CEE320 Winter2006 Spiral Curves No Spiral Spiral from AASHTO’s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets 2001 FYI – NOT TESTABLE
- 51. CEE320 Winter2006 No Spiral FYI – NOT TESTABLE
- 52. CEE320 Winter2006 Spiral Curves • WSDOT no longer uses spiral curves • Involve complex geometry • Require more surveying • Are somewhat empirical • If used, superelevation transition should occur entirely within spiral FYI – NOT TESTABLE
- 53. CEE320 Winter2006 Desirable Spiral Lengths from AASHTO’s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets 2001 FYI – NOT TESTABLE
- 54. CEE320 Winter2006 Operating vs. Design Speed 85th Percentile Speed vs. Inferred Design Speed for 138 Rural Two-Lane Highway Horizontal Curves 85th Percentile Speed vs. Inferred Design Speed for Rural Two-Lane Highway Limited Sight Distance Crest Vertical Curves FYI – NOT TESTABLE
- 55. CEE320 Winter2006 Primary References • Mannering, F.L.; Kilareski, W.P. and Washburn, S.S. (2005). Principles of Highway Engineering and Traffic Analysis, Third Edition. Chapter 3 • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2001). A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, Fourth Edition. Washington, D.C.

No public clipboards found for this slide

Be the first to comment