The document outlines a project to develop an artificial stability augmentation system (USAS) for unmanned aerial vehicles. It discusses the mission objectives, an overview of design alternatives, specifications for the system design, and a risk assessment plan. A project plan is presented, including an organizational chart, work breakdown structure, schedule, cost estimates, and required facilities and resources.

9. Jake Hanft Development and Assessment of Design Alternatives

11. Functional Needs

20. Design Metric (Microcontrollers)

21. Design Metric (Test-Bed Aircraft, Sensors and Power Configuration) Independent Adds extra weight but may be necessary 1 Score: 1 Rating: High Cost: ? Rating: Low Cost: Free Rating: Low Score: 1 Rating: High 1 Eliminate the need to add another battery back just for the SAS, however, the receiver battery may not carry enough voltage to do this. Tap into Reciever's Power Power Configuration 0 PC board mountable, but difficult configuration compared to PX139 Cost: $40 Rating: Low Score: 1 Rating: Low 1 Good range, 5V operation Omega PX71-0.3GV 0 The extra voltage may require an independent power source Cost: $85 Rating: Low Score: 1 Rating: Low 1 Good range, 8V operation Omega PX138-0.3D5v 1 Has just enough range and has a 5V operating level enabling power through same output as microcontroller Cost: $85 Rating: Low Score: 2 Rating: High 1 Good range, 5V operation Omega PX139-0.3D5V Pressure Transducer 0 Does not have large enough range Cost: Free Rating: Low Score: -1 Rating: Low -1 ±10 g Dual Axis Accelerometer with Duty Cycle Outputs Analog Devices ADXL210 1 Can be programmable to ±25 g Cost: Free Rating: Low Score: 2 Rating: High 1 ±50g Dual Axis Accelerometer with Analog Outputs Analog Devices ADXL250 Accelerometer Cost: $120 Rating: Low Score: 1 Rating: Low 1 Would have to take from Futaba package Piezo 1 MEM device with excellent noise handling Cost: $50 Rating: Low Score: 2 Rating: High 1 150 deg/s, can come packaged on an evaluation board Analog Devices ADXL150 2 MEM device with excellent noise handling and larger range Cost: $50 Rating: Low Score: 3 Rating: High 1 300 deg/s, can come packaged on an evalutation board Analog Devices ADXL300 Rate Gyro Low Low 1 Would not have to spend time designing an airplane, however, it would be just as time consuming to redesign a kit. The balsa construction would not be nearly as robust as the custom fiberglass. Kit Low High 3 By building a custom plane, we can custom fit the control package, as well as incorporate a moveable cg apparatus. Also, we will be able to vary the tail length and be able to test the SAS on different configurations easily Custom Test-Bed Aircraft Cost Attributes Scale Specs and Comments Manufacturer/Part Component

22. Comparison of Design Alternatives Results

23. Design-To Specifications Tom Bateman HYPER-X USAS

25. General Arrangement Cargo Bay 3.75” x 5.5” x 10” R/C Receivers (2) Powerplant Astro 661/APC 15x7 Tailboom Adjustable Length CG Apparatus Inflight Adjustable

26. Major Aircraft Subsystems Pitch (y) (SAS Control Axis) Roll (x) Yaw (z) Powerplant Electric Motor (.60 size) 30 cell NiCd Main Battery Primary Flight Control System R/C Receiver (Rx) Rx Battery (Shared by SAS) Servos (Rudder, Aileron) Motor Speed Control SAS Electronics and Sensor Package Microcontroller Pitch Rate Gyro Pressure Transducer Linear Accelerometer CG Control System Sail Winch Servo Balance Weight Pitch Control High Speed Digital Servo Elevator

27. SAS Block Diagram MICROCONTROLLER PITCH RATE GYRO DATA ACQUISITION PILOT PITCH SIGNAL PILOT + SAS PITCH SIGNAL CG CONTROL SERVO BALANCE WEIGHT GAIN CONTROL MANUAL CG CONTROL PRESSURE TRANSDUCER LINEAR ACCELEROMETER PCS FEEDBACK SIGNAL COMMAND OVERRIDE CGS FEEDBACK SIGNAL SAS BATTERY Rx BATTERY AUTO CG CONTROL CG CONTROL PCS BYPASS POWER COMMANDS OUTPUTS SENSORS Legend R/C TRANSMITTER R/C RECEIVER P/C SERVO ELEVATOR

28. Electronics Chassis Microcontroller PIC18F458 Rate Gyro Pressure Transducer Accelerometer Chassis QuikFlash Board

29. Controller Board Schematic PITCH COMMAND PWMD PITCH RATE CG CONTROL FEEDBACK DYNAMIC PRESSURE Z-AXIS ACCELERATION PITCH COMMAND GAIN CONTROL COMMAND OVERRIDE MICROCONTROLLER V REF A/D A/D 0/1 A/D A/D A/D PWMD PWM PITCH FEEDBACK A/D A/D REG DATA ACQUISITION (EXTERNAL RAM) 0101… VDD 6-9 VDC CG COMMAND PWM CG CONTROL PWMD A/D POWER INTERRUPT DATA SWITCH 0/1 POWER COMMANDS OUTPUTS FEEDBACK SENSORS Legend

30. Control Process Flow Start (power on) Initialize variables Pitch rate Read sensor inputs Pilot command Gain control Dynamic pressure Read command inputs Command override Z-axis acceleration Read feedback inputs Elevator servo CG Servo Estimate commanded pitch rate Compute PR error Apply control gain Compute elevator deflection Output elevator control signal Pitch command A/D A/D A/D PWM PWM 0/1 A/D A/D PWM Output data acquisition External Flash RAM 0101… Apply SAS Authority Limiting Watchdog/ Brownout Timing Loop Command Override ? Bypass pitch control CG control PWM N Y Command CG to full forward CG command PWM Bypass CG control Data switch 0/1 Data switch 0/1 Primary Control Algorithm

31. Sensors, Actuators, Electronics

32. Simulink Model

33. Simulink Model (Detail)

34. System Dynamic Response Step Input System Off System On Turbulence System Off System On

35. Wing Aerodynamic and Structural Model

36. Wing Aerodynamic and Structural Model

37. SAS Performance Target

38. Test-Bed Aircraft Specifications

39. CG Control System Specifications

40. Data Acquisition Specifications

41. Simulation Specifications

42. Design Issues and Risk Assessment Mike Sheek

43. Test-Bed Aircraft N/A High -Ensure that an experienced pilot flies Aircraft -Select an ‘Almost Ready to Fly' model to use in re-building effort -Ensure that all pre-flight tests and precautions have been made before flight tests -Require intense last minute build effort -Inability to verify SAS in RC aircraft Test-bed aircraft mishap prior to SAS tests Off-Ramp: March 19 th If SAS cannot be integrated by this date prioritization will move to developing alternative testing apparatus Medium -Develop test-bed aircraft in parallel with SAS -Develop back-up testing apparatus to test SAS capabilities -Require unexpected team resources to overcome complication Unable to integrate the SAS with the test-bed Aircraft Off-Ramp Risk Factor Accommodations Impact Specific Risk

44. Microcontroller N/A High -Select and thoroughly test processor capabilities (w/ components if possible) ASAP -Allocate funds for a back-up microprocessor if need arises -Degrade / disable required performance requirements -Require unexpected team resources to overcome complication -Exceed budget when replacement must be ordered or find required replacement unavailable Discrepancy between expected vs. actual performance N/A High -Schedule critical path -Select processor ASAP -Build expertise on subject by having 3 team members taking Dr. Palo’s Data Acquisition course -Unable to integrate all Components by Project Due Date Software Development Inexperience Off-Ramp Risk Factor Accommodation Impact Specific Risk

45. Presented by Adam Dean Project Management Plan

46. Organizational Responsibilities

47. Project Organization Chart Movable CG Apparatus Design -Mike Sheek- Project Manager (PM) -Adam Dean- Chief Financial Officer (CFO) -Barry Blakeley- Documentation / Web Maintenance -Mike Sheek- -Jake Hanft- Project Test and Evaluation -Barry Blakeley- Flight Control / USAS Integration -Tom Bateman- Control System Software Design -Jake Hanft- Control System Hardware Design -Jake Hanft Test-Bed Aircraft Design - Tom Bateman- Safety Engineer -Tom Bateman-

48. Work Breakdown Structure 1.0 Program Management 2.0 System Engineering 3.0 Control System 6.0 C.G. Apparatus 4.0 Test-Bed Aircraft 5.0 Data Acquisition 7.0 Pre-Flight Simulate and Verify 1.1 Budget Management (CFO) 1.2 Task Delegation and Organization 1.4 Website and Documentation 1.3 Weekly Time Sheet Collection 1.1 Scheduling 2.1System Integration 2.2 System Specifications 2.3 Design to Specs. Monitoring 3.1 Micro Controller 3.2 Control Theory 3.2 Servos 3.4 Control Software 4.3 Engine Selection 4.2 Structure 4.1Aero Dynamics 3.3 Power System 5.1 Storage Device 3.5 Sensors (Rate Gyros, Accelerometer, etc.) 3.6 Integration 4.7 Tail-Boom Design 4.5 Backbone Design 4.4 Fuselage Design 5.2 Data Source Interfaces 4.6 Landing Gear Design 5.3 Data Uplink 6.3 C.G. Manipulation Effects 6.1 C.G. H/W 6.2 C.G. S/W 6.4 C.G. Apparatus Control Interface 8.0 Test and Verification 8.1 Develop Test Plans 4.8 Fabrication 8.3 Test analysis and Reporting 8.2 C.G. Control System Bench Test 8.3 SAS Hardware Bench test 8.2 Static Wing Loading Test 8.3 Test-Bed Aircraft Flight Test 8.2 C.G. Control System Flight Test 8.3 SAS Hardware Passive Inflight Test 8.2 SAS Active Inflight Test 7.2 Simulation Software 7.1 Simulation Method 7.4 Verification Software 7.3 Verification Method

49. Test and Evaluation Program CG Control System Bench Test Due ~ 3/5/04 SAS Hardware Passive Inflight Test Due ~ 4/2/04 Data Analysis Due ~ 4/29 SAS Hardware Active Inflight Test Due ~ 4/22/04 CG Control System Flight Test Due ~ 3/29/04 Test-Bed Aircraft Flight Test Due ~ 3/23/04 Static Wing Loading Test Due ~ 10/903 SAS Hardware Bench Test Due ~ 3/12/04

50. Program Schedule

51. Program Schedule

52. Estimated Cost Breakdown

53. Preliminary Drawing Tree

54. Preliminary Drawing Tree

55. Preliminary Drawing Tree

56. Preliminary Drawing Tree

58. Team USAS Questions

59. Back-Up Charts

60. System Functional Elements

61. Program Schedule

62. Program Schedule

63. Program Schedule