Flight controls allow pilots to control the forces of flight and maneuver aircraft. This chapter focuses on basic flight control systems, from early mechanical systems to modern fly-by-wire designs. It describes the primary flight controls - ailerons, elevators, and rudders - and how they control roll, pitch, and yaw respectively. Adverse yaw created by ailerons is also discussed, as are methods to reduce it like differential ailerons. The chapter provides examples of different flight control configurations for various aircraft types.
Nomenclature and classification of controls in an airplane (slide # 3-4).
Which are the aerodynamic forces acting on airplane (slide # 5).
Working principle of an airplane (slide # 6).
How an airplane flies (basic motions of an airplane) (slide # 7).
How controls play their roles in these motions (slide # 8-22).
Simulate a flight in Cessna Skyhawk (slide # 23-28).
References and Questions & answers (slide # 30).
Abstract:
Landing gear is one of the critical subsystems of an aircraft. The need to design landing gear with minimum weight, minimum volume, high performance, improved life and reduced life cycle cost have posed many challenges to landing gear designers and practitioners. Further it is essential to reduce the landing gear design and development cycle time while meeting all the regulatory and safety requirements. Many technologies have been developed over the years to meet these challenges in design and development of landing gear. This paper presents a perspective on various stages of landing gear design and development, current technology landscape and how these technologies are helping us to meet the challenges involved in the development of landing gear and how they are going to evolve in future.
NAME : S. Srinivasa Phani Kumar
Branch : MECHANICAL
College : SWARNANDHRA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
THIS PRESENTATION TAKES OVERVIEW OF AIRCRAFT CABIN PRESSURIZATION. IN THIS I EXPLAINED BASIC SYSTEM USED FOR PRESSURIZATION, AND HOW THIS SYSTEM IS SAFE, PRECISE. AND HOW AIR IS KEPT HEALTHY.
Structural detailing of fuselage of aeroplane /aircraft.PriyankaKg4
This presentation is about the structural detailing of fuselage of aeroplane .The fuselage or body of the airplane, holds all the pieces together. The pilots sit in the cockpit at the front of the fuselage. Passengers and cargo are carried in the rear of the fuselage. Some aircraft carry fuel in the fuselage; others carry the fuel in the wings.
Your smart remote control
Control any household device in an integrated and accessible manner with the BJ Environmental Control System.
Thanks to its infrared learning system you can control any device that works using a remote control.
With the appropiate receivers you can control also other elements like doors, lights, beds, ceiling hoists, blinds, electrical appliances, alert systems, etc.
Nomenclature and classification of controls in an airplane (slide # 3-4).
Which are the aerodynamic forces acting on airplane (slide # 5).
Working principle of an airplane (slide # 6).
How an airplane flies (basic motions of an airplane) (slide # 7).
How controls play their roles in these motions (slide # 8-22).
Simulate a flight in Cessna Skyhawk (slide # 23-28).
References and Questions & answers (slide # 30).
Abstract:
Landing gear is one of the critical subsystems of an aircraft. The need to design landing gear with minimum weight, minimum volume, high performance, improved life and reduced life cycle cost have posed many challenges to landing gear designers and practitioners. Further it is essential to reduce the landing gear design and development cycle time while meeting all the regulatory and safety requirements. Many technologies have been developed over the years to meet these challenges in design and development of landing gear. This paper presents a perspective on various stages of landing gear design and development, current technology landscape and how these technologies are helping us to meet the challenges involved in the development of landing gear and how they are going to evolve in future.
NAME : S. Srinivasa Phani Kumar
Branch : MECHANICAL
College : SWARNANDHRA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
THIS PRESENTATION TAKES OVERVIEW OF AIRCRAFT CABIN PRESSURIZATION. IN THIS I EXPLAINED BASIC SYSTEM USED FOR PRESSURIZATION, AND HOW THIS SYSTEM IS SAFE, PRECISE. AND HOW AIR IS KEPT HEALTHY.
Structural detailing of fuselage of aeroplane /aircraft.PriyankaKg4
This presentation is about the structural detailing of fuselage of aeroplane .The fuselage or body of the airplane, holds all the pieces together. The pilots sit in the cockpit at the front of the fuselage. Passengers and cargo are carried in the rear of the fuselage. Some aircraft carry fuel in the fuselage; others carry the fuel in the wings.
Your smart remote control
Control any household device in an integrated and accessible manner with the BJ Environmental Control System.
Thanks to its infrared learning system you can control any device that works using a remote control.
With the appropiate receivers you can control also other elements like doors, lights, beds, ceiling hoists, blinds, electrical appliances, alert systems, etc.
World Record Inaugural Flights Thomas M. Lee Pictorial History - 2016Zodiac Aerospace
Thomas Lee holds a world record of flying the most inaugural (first commercial flights) on brand new aircraft types spanning 50 years. This presentation covers this half century record including maiden flights on the B747, A380, B787, A350 and CSeries aircraft.
I can identify key technological advancements that helped in making our knowledge of space expand. My research will show the past, but I will also predict what future advancements may stretch our limits even more.
A control system is a collection of mechanical and electronic equipment that allows an aircraft to be flown with exceptional precision and reliability. Torque tubes are often used to actuate ailerons and flaps.
Aircraft pitch control design using LQG controller based on genetic algorithmTELKOMNIKA JOURNAL
Designing a robust aircraft control system used to achieve a good tracking performance and stable dynamic behavior against working disturbances problem has attracted attention of control engineers. In this paper, a pitch angle control system for aircraft is designed utilizing liner quadratic Gaussian (LQG) optimal controller technique with a numerical tuning algorithm method in the longitudinal plane through cruising stage. Main design approach of LQG controller includes obtaining best weighting matrices values using trial and error method that consumes effort and takes more time, in addition, there is no guarantees to obtain optimum values for weighting matrices elements. In this research, genetic algorithm (GA) is used to optimize the state and control weighting matrices and determine best values for their elements. The proposed traditional and optimized LQG pitch controller schemes are implemented utilizing Matlab simulation tool and their performance are presented and compared based on transient and steady state performance parameters. The simulation results reveal the ability of the optimized GA_LQG controller to reject the effect of the noises in the aircraft system dynamic and achieve a good and stable tracking performance compared with that of the conventional LQG pitch control system.
Tracking and control problem of an aircraftANSUMAN MISHRA
Here our main focus is to monitor and maneuver the flight for a particular distance in a time-scale with absolute control. For this a rigorous formulation of flight mechanics and theories associated with advanced control systems are simplified and analyzed to obtain a feasible & optimized solution.
It is also important to remember that this idea basically involves handling problems of maneuvering control and other pilot-issues of an inner-loop flight-control system and does not dwell on outer loop control systems .
The operational significance of this maneuver is that it allows the pilot to slew quickly without increasing the normal acceleration and turning.
Smart aerosonde UAV longitudinal flight control system based on genetic algor...journalBEEI
Synthesis of a flight control system for such an aircraft that achieves stable and acceptable performance across a specified flying envelope in the presence of uncertainties represents an attractive and challenging design problem. This study uses the genetic self-tuning PID algorithm to develop an intelligent flight control system for the aerosonde UAV model. To improve the system's transient responses, the gains of the PID controller are improved using a genetic algorithm (GA). Simulink/MATLAB software is used to model and simulate the proposed system. The proposed PID controller integrated with the GA is compared with the classical one. Three simulation scenarios are carried out. In the first scenario, and at normal conditions, the proposed controller performance is better than the classical one. While in the second scenario, identical results are achieved from both controllers. Finally, in the third scenario, the PID controller with GA shows the robustness and durability of the system compared with the classical PID in presence of external wind disturbance. The simulation results prove the system parameters optimization.
Taking ground effect into account a longitudinal automatic landing system is designed. Such a system will be tested and implemented on board by using the Preceptor N3 Ultrapup aircraft which is used as technological demonstrator of new control navigation and guidance algorithms in the context of the “Research Project of National Interest” (PRIN 2008) by the Universities of Bologna, Palermo, Ferrara and the Second University of Naples. A general mathematical model of the studied aircraft has been built to obtain non–linear analytical equations for aerodynamic coefficients both Out of Ground Effect and In Ground Effect. To cope with the strong variations of aerodynamic coefficients In Ground Effect a modified gain scheduling approach has been employed for the synthesis of the controller by using six State Space Models. Stability and control matrices have been evaluated by linearization of the obtained aerodynamic coefficients. To achieve a simple structure of the control system, an original landing geometry has been chosen, therefore it has been imposed to control the same state variables during both the glide path and the flare.
Robust control of aircraft flight in conditions of disturbancesIJECEIAES
One of the most dangerous parts of the flight is the landing phase, as most accidents occur at this stage. In order to reduce the effect of the low-level wind shear on the longitudinal motion of the aircraft in the glide path landing mode (task) a robust H− control isproposed. Dynamic models of the plane and wind shear are built. 𝐻2 and 𝐻∞ synthesis methods are investigated for the task of aircraft flight control in a vertical plane during landing under conditions of undefined disturbances. Both control methods allow to reduce height deviation significantly. However, suboptimal control 𝐻∞ provides better quality of transition processes both in height and speed than optimal control 𝐻2. The results of simulation of the synthesized system confirm the effectiveness of 𝐻∞ − control for increasing robust stability to uncertainties caused by wind disturbances.
Improvement of Pitch Motion Control of an Aircraft SystemsTELKOMNIKA JOURNAL
The movement of the aircraft pitch is very important to ensure the passengers and crews are in
intrinsically safe and the aircraft achieves its maximum stability.The objective of this study is to provide a
solution to the control system that features particularly on the pitch angle motion of aircraft systemin order
to have a comfort boarding. Three controllers were developed in these projects which wereproportional
integral derivative (PID), fuzzy logic controller (FLC), and linear quadratic regulator (LQR) controllers.
These controllers will help improving the pitch angle and achievingthe target reference. By improving the
pitch motion angle, the flight will be stabilized and in steady cruise (no jerking effect), hence provides all
the passengers withthe comfort zone. Simulation results have been done and analyzed using Matlab
software. The simulation results demonstrated LQR and FLC were better than PID in the pitch motion
system due to the small error performance. In addition, withstrong external disturbances, a single controller
is unable to control the system, thus, the combination of PID and LQR managed to stabilize the aircraft.
Thrust vector controlled (tcv) rocket modelling using lqr controllerMrinal Harsh
Design and state space modelling of a TCV Rocket using Simulink and Matlab with Gimbal Angle, Angular Velocity and Drift experienced as our control parameters.
- Using LQR control to stabilize the model.
- Support why LQR is used over PID control for TCV Modelling.
IJRET : International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology is an international peer reviewed, online journal published by eSAT Publishing House for the enhancement of research in various disciplines of Engineering and Technology. The aim and scope of the journal is to provide an academic medium and an important reference for the advancement and dissemination of research results that support high-level learning, teaching and research in the fields of Engineering and Technology. We bring together Scientists, Academician, Field Engineers, Scholars and Students of related fields of Engineering and Technology
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
1. Chapter 5
Flight Controls
Introduction
This chapter focuses on the flight control systems a pilot uses
to control the forces of flight, and the aircraft’s direction and
attitude. It should be noted that flight control systems and
characteristics can vary greatly depending on the type of
aircraft flown. The most basic flight control system designs
are mechanical and date back to early aircraft. They operate
with a collection of mechanical parts such as rods, cables,
pulleys, and sometimes chains to transmit the forces of the
flight deck controls to the control surfaces. Mechanical flight
control systems are still used today in small general and
sport category aircraft where the aerodynamic forces are not
excessive. [Figure 5-1]
5-1
2. of this project is to develop an adaptive neural network-based
Control stick flight control system. Applied directly to flight control system
Elevator feedback errors, IFCS provides adjustments to improve
aircraft performance in normal flight as well as with system
Pulleys failures. With IFCS, a pilot is able to maintain control and
safely land an aircraft that has suffered a failure to a control
surface or damage to the airframe. It also improves mission
capability, increases the reliability and safety of flight, and
eases the pilot workload.
Today’s aircraft employ a variety of flight control systems.
Cable Push rod
For example, some aircraft in the sport pilot category rely on
weight-shift control to fly while balloons use a standard burn
Figure 5-1. Mechanical flight control system. technique. Helicopters utilize a cyclic to tilt the rotor in the
As aviation matured and aircraft designers learned more about desired direction along with a collective to manipulate rotor
aerodynamics, the industry produced larger and faster aircraft. pitch and anti-torque pedals to control yaw. [Figure 5-3]
Therefore, the aerodynamic forces acting upon the control
surfaces increased exponentially. To make the control force
required by pilots manageable, aircraft engineers designed Yaw
more complex systems. At first, hydromechanical designs, ve Cycli
Collecti c
Cycli
consisting of a mechanical circuit and a hydraulic circuit,
c
Cyclic stick
were used to reduce the complexity, weight, and limitations
of mechanical flight controls systems. [Figure 5-2] Yaw
Cy
clic clic
Cy
Neutral
e
Control stick (AFT—Nose up) ectiv
Coll
LEGEND
Hydraulic pressure
Hydraulic return
Pivot point
Anti-torque pedals Collective lever
Elevator (UP) Control valves Control cables
Figure 5-3. Helicopter flight control system.
Neutral
For additional information on flight control systems, refer
to the appropriate handbook for information related to the
Power disconnect linkage Neutral Power cylinder flight control systems and characteristics of specific types
of aircraft.
Figure 5-2. Hydromechanical flight control system.
Flight Control Systems
As aircraft became more sophisticated, the control surfaces Flight Controls
were actuated by electric motors, digital computers, or fiber Aircraft flight control systems consist of primary and
optic cables. Called “fly-by-wire,” this flight control system secondary systems. The ailerons, elevator (or stabilator), and
replaces the physical connection between pilot controls and rudder constitute the primary control system and are required to
the flight control surfaces with an electrical interface. In control an aircraft safely during flight. Wing flaps, leading edge
addition, in some large and fast aircraft, controls are boosted devices, spoilers, and trim systems constitute the secondary
by hydraulically or electrically actuated systems. In both control system and improve the performance characteristics of
the fly-by-wire and boosted controls, the feel of the control the airplane or relieve the pilot of excessive control forces.
reaction is fed back to the pilot by simulated means.
Primary Flight Controls
Current research at the National Aeronautics and Space Aircraft control systems are carefully designed to provide
Administration (NASA) Dryden Flight Research Center adequate responsiveness to control inputs while allowing a
involves Intelligent Flight Control Systems (IFCS). The goal
5-2
3. natural feel. At low airspeeds, the controls usually feel soft Ailerons
and sluggish, and the aircraft responds slowly to control Ailerons control roll about the longitudinal axis. The ailerons
applications. At higher airspeeds, the controls become are attached to the outboard trailing edge of each wing and
increasingly firm and aircraft response is more rapid. move in the opposite direction from each other. Ailerons are
connected by cables, bellcranks, pulleys and/or push-pull tubes
Movement of any of the three primary flight control surfaces to a control wheel or control stick.
(ailerons, elevator or stabilator, or rudder), changes the airflow
and pressure distribution over and around the airfoil. These Moving the control wheel or control stick to the right causes
changes affect the lift and drag produced by the airfoil/control the right aileron to deflect upward and the left aileron to deflect
surface combination, and allow a pilot to control the aircraft downward. The upward deflection of the right aileron decreases
about its three axes of rotation. the camber resulting in decreased lift on the right wing. The
corresponding downward deflection of the left aileron increases
Design features limit the amount of deflection of flight control the camber resulting in increased lift on the left wing. Thus,
surfaces. For example, control-stop mechanisms may be the increased lift on the left wing and the decreased lift on the
incorporated into the flight control linkages, or movement right wing causes the airplane to roll to the right.
of the control column and/or rudder pedals may be limited.
The purpose of these design limits is to prevent the pilot from Adverse Yaw
inadvertently overcontrolling and overstressing the aircraft Since the downward deflected aileron produces more lift as
during normal maneuvers. evidenced by the wing raising, it also produces more drag. This
added drag causes the wing to slow down slightly. This results
A properly designed airplane is stable and easily controlled in the aircraft yawing toward the wing which had experienced
during normal maneuvering. Control surface inputs cause an increase in lift (and drag). From the pilot’s perspective, the
movement about the three axes of rotation. The types of yaw is opposite the direction of the bank. The adverse yaw
stability an airplane exhibits also relate to the three axes of is a result of differential drag and the slight difference in the
rotation. [Figure 5-4] velocity of the left and right wings. [Figure 5-5]
El Rudder—Yaw
ev
at
La or Vertical axis
—
(lo tera Pit
Lift
(directional
ng l a ch
sta i x stability)
bil tud is Roll
ity ina on— Drag
) l Ailer al
itudin
Long(lateral
axis ity)
stabil
A
Lift
g
Dra
dv
e r s e yaw
Primary
Control Airplane Axes of Type of Figure 5-5. Adverse yaw is caused by higher drag on the outside
Surface Movement Rotation Stability
wing, which is producing is caused by higher drag on the outside
Figure 5-2. Adverse yaw more lift.
Aileron Roll Longitudinal Lateral wing, which is producing more lift.
Elevator/ Adverse yaw becomes more pronounced at low airspeeds.
Pitch Lateral Longitudinal
Stabilator At these slower airspeeds aerodynamic pressure on control
Rudder Yaw Vertical Directional surfaces are low and larger control inputs are required to
effectively maneuver the airplane. As a result, the increase in
Figure 5-1. Airplane controls, movement, axes of rotation, and aileron deflection causes an increase in adverse yaw. The yaw
Figure 5-4. Airplane controls, movement, axes of rotation, and
type of stability. is especially evident in aircraft with long wing spans.
type of stability.
5-3
4. Application of rudder is used to counteract adverse yaw. The
amount of rudder control required is greatest at low airspeeds,
Aileron deflected up
high angles of attack, and with large aileron deflections. Like
all control surfaces at lower airspeeds, the vertical stabilizer/
rudder becomes less effective, and magnifies the control
problems associated with adverse yaw.
Differential aileron
All turns are coordinated by use of ailerons, rudder, and
elevator. Applying aileron pressure is necessary to place
the aircraft in the desired angle of bank, while simultaneous
application of rudder pressure is necessary to counteract the Aileron deflected down
resultant adverse yaw. Additionally, because more lift is
required during a turn than when in straight-and-level flight, Figure 5-6. Differential ailerons.
the angle of attack (AOA) must be increased by applying
elevator back pressure. The steeper the turn, the more elevator Neutral
back pressure is needed.
As the desired angle of bank is established, aileron and rudder
pressures should be relaxed. This stops the angle of bank from
increasing, because the aileron and rudder control surfaces are
in a neutral and streamlined position. Elevator back pressure
should be held constant to maintain altitude. The roll-out
Raised
from a turn is similar to the roll-in, except the flight controls
are applied in the opposite direction. Aileron and rudder are
applied in the direction of the roll-out or toward the high wing.
As the angle of bank decreases, the elevator back pressure
should be relaxed as necessary to maintain altitude.
Drag
In an attempt to reduce the effects of adverse yaw,
manufacturers have engineered four systems: differential Lowered
ailerons, frise-type ailerons, coupled ailerons and rudder,
and flaperons.
Differential Ailerons
With differential ailerons, one aileron is raised a greater
distance than the other aileron is lowered for a given
movement of the control wheel or control stick. This produces Figure 5-4. Frise-type ailerons.
Figure 5-7. Frise-type ailerons.
an increase in drag on the descending wing. The greater drag
results from deflecting the up aileron on the descending wing angles of attack. Frise-type ailerons may also be designed
to a greater angle than the down aileron on the rising wing. to function differentially. Like the differential aileron, the
While adverse yaw is reduced, it is not eliminated completely. frise-type aileron does not eliminate adverse yaw entirely.
[Figure 5-6] Coordinated rudder application is still needed wherever
ailerons are applied.
Frise-Type Ailerons
With a frise-type aileron, when pressure is applied to the Coupled Ailerons and Rudder
control wheel or control stick, the aileron that is being raised Coupled ailerons and rudder are linked controls. This is
pivots on an offset hinge. This projects the leading edge of accomplished with rudder-aileron interconnect springs, which
the aileron into the airflow and creates drag. It helps equalize help correct for aileron drag by automatically deflecting
the drag created by the lowered aileron on the opposite wing the rudder at the same time the ailerons are deflected. For
and reduces adverse yaw. [Figure 5-7] example, when the control wheel or control stick is moved
to produce a left roll, the interconnect cable and spring pulls
The frise-type aileron also forms a slot so air flows smoothly forward on the left rudder pedal just enough to prevent the
over the lowered aileron, making it more effective at high nose of the aircraft from yawing to the right. The force applied
5-4
5. Rudder deflects with ailerons
Figure 5-9. Flaperons on a Skystar Kitfox MK 7.
The up-elevator position decreases the camber of the elevator
and creates a downward aerodynamic force, which is greater
than the normal tail-down force that exists in straight-and-
level flight. The overall effect causes the tail of the aircraft
to move down and the nose to pitch up. The pitching moment
occurs about the center of gravity (CG). The strength of the
pitching moment is determined by the distance between
the CG and the horizontal tail surface, as well as by the
aerodynamic effectiveness of the horizontal tail surface.
Moving the control column forward has the opposite effect.
In this case, elevator camber increases, creating more lift
(less tail-down force) on the horizontal stabilizer/elevator.
Rudder/Aileron interconnecting springs This moves the tail upward and pitches the nose down. Again,
the pitching moment occurs about the CG.
Figure 5-8. Coupled ailerons and rudder. As mentioned earlier in the coverage on stability, power,
Figure 5-5. Coupled ailerons and rudder.
to the rudder by the springs can be overridden if it becomes thrustline, and the position of the horizontal tail surfaces
necessary to slip the aircraft. [Figure 5-8] on the empennage are factors in elevator effectiveness
controlling pitch. For example, the horizontal tail surfaces
Flaperons may be attached near the lower part of the vertical stabilizer,
at the midpoint, or at the high point, as in the T-tail design.
Flaperons combine both aspects of flaps and ailerons. In
addition to controlling the bank angle of an aircraft like
conventional ailerons, flaperons can be lowered together
to function much the same as a dedicated set of flaps. The
pilot retains separate controls for ailerons and flaps. A mixer
is used to combine the separate pilot inputs into this single Control column
Aft
Tail down
set of control surfaces called flaperons. Many designs that
Up elevator
Nose up
incorporate flaperons mount the control surfaces away from CG
the wing to provide undisturbed airflow at high angles of
attack and/or low airspeeds. [Figure 5-9]
Elevator
Downward
The elevator controls pitch about the lateral axis. Like the aerodynamic force
ailerons on small aircraft, the elevator is connected to the
control column in the flight deck by a series of mechanical
linkages. Aft movement of the control column deflects
the trailing edge of the elevator surface up. This is usually Figure 5-6. elevator is the primary control for changing the
Figure 5-10. The elevator is the primary control for changing the
referred to as up “elevator.” [Figure 5-10] pitch attitude of an airplane.
pitch attitude of an airplane.
5-5
6. T-Tail
In a T-tail configuration, the elevator is above most of the
effects of downwash from the propeller as well as airflow
around the fuselage and/or wings during normal flight
conditions. Operation of the elevators in this undisturbed air
allows control movements that are consistent throughout most
flight regimes. T-tail designs have become popular on many CG
light and large aircraft, especially those with aft fuselage-
mounted engines because the T-tail configuration removes
the tail from the exhaust blast of the engines. Seaplanes and
amphibians often have T-tails in order to keep the horizontal
surfaces as far from the water as possible. An additional
benefit is reduced vibration and noise inside the aircraft.
At slow speeds, the elevator on a T-tail aircraft must be moved Figure 5-11. Airplane with a T-tail design atat hign angle of attack
Figure 5-7. Airplane with a T-tail design a a high AOA and an
through a larger number of degrees of travel to raise the nose aft CG. aft CG.
and an
a given amount than on a conventional-tail aircraft. This is
control stops to elevator down springs. An elevator down
because the conventional-tail aircraft has the downwash from
spring assists in lowering the nose of the aircraft to prevent a
the propeller pushing down on the tail to assist in raising the
stall caused by the aft CG position. The stall occurs because
nose.
the properly trimmed airplane is flying with the elevator in a
trailing edge down position, forcing the tail up and the nose
Since controls on aircraft are rigged so that increasing control
down. In this unstable condition, if the aircraft encounters
forces are required for increased control travel, the forces
turbulence and slows down further, the trim tab no longer
required to raise the nose of a T-tail aircraft are greater than
positions the elevator in the nose-down position. The elevator
those for a conventional-tail aircraft. Longitudinal stability of
then streamlines, and the nose of the aircraft pitches upward,
a trimmed aircraft is the same for both types of configuration,
possibly resulting in a stall.
but the pilot must be aware that the required control forces are
greater at slow speeds during takeoffs, landings, or stalls than
The elevator down spring produces a mechanical load on the
for similar size aircraft equipped with conventional tails.
elevator, causing it to move toward the nose-down position
if not otherwise balanced. The elevator trim tab balances the
T-tail airplanes also require additional design considerations
elevator down spring to position the elevator in a trimmed
to counter the problem of flutter. Since the weight of the
position. When the trim tab becomes ineffective, the down
horizontal surfaces is at the top of the vertical stabilizer,
spring drives the elevator to a nose-down position. The nose
the moment arm created causes high loads on the vertical
of the aircraft lowers, speed builds up, and a stall is prevented.
stabilizer which can result in flutter. Engineers must
[Figure 5-12]
compensate for this by increasing the design stiffness of the
vertical stabilizer, usually resulting in a weight penalty over
The elevator must also have sufficient authority to hold the
conventional tail designs.
nose of the aircraft up during the roundout for a landing. In
this case, a forward CG may cause a problem. During the
When flying at a very high AOA with a low airspeed and
landing flare, power is usually reduced, which decreases the
an aft CG, the T-tail aircraft may be susceptible to a deep
airflow over the empennage. This, coupled with the reduced
stall. In a deep stall, the airflow over the horizontal tail
landing speed, makes the elevator less effective.
is blanketed by the disturbed airflow from the wings and
fuselage. In these circumstances, elevator or stabilator control
As this discussion demonstrates, pilots must understand and
could be diminished, making it difficult to recover from the
follow proper loading procedures, particularly with regard
stall. It should be noted that an aft CG is often a contributing
to the CG position. More information on aircraft loading, as
factor in these incidents, since similar recovery problems
well as weight and balance, is included in Chapter 9, Weight
are also found with conventional tail aircraft with an aft CG.
and Balance.
[Figure 5-11]
Since flight at a high AOA with a low airspeed and an aft Stabilator
CG position can be dangerous, many aircraft have systems As mentioned in Chapter 2, Aircraft Structure, a stabilator
to compensate for this situation. The systems range from is essentially a one-piece horizontal stabilizer that pivots
5-6
7. Antiservo tab
Down spring
Stabilator
Pivot points
Elevator Balance weight Pivot point
Bell crank
Figure 5-13. One stabilator is a one-piece horizontal tail up and
Figure 5-9. The piece horizontal tail surface that pivots surface
that pivots upaand down about a central hinge point.
down about central hinge point.
Figure 5-12. When the aerodynamic efficiency of the horizontal
Figure 5-8. is inadequate due to an aft CG condition,horizontal
tail surface When the aerodynamic efficiency of the an elevator design, and the other with a surface of the same approximate
tail surface is inadequate due to an aft center of gravity condition,
down spring may be used to supply a mechanical load to lower size and airfoil of the aft-mounted wing known as a tandem
an elevator down spring may be used to supply a mechanical load
the nose. wing configuration. Theoretically, the canard is considered
to lower the nose. more efficient because using the horizontal surface to help
from a central hinge point. When the control column is lift the weight of the aircraft should result in less drag for a
pulled back, it raises the stabilator’s trailing edge, pulling given amount of lift.
the airplane’s nose up. Pushing the control column forward
lowers the trailing edge of the stabilator and pitches the nose Rudder
of the airplane down.
The rudder controls movement of the aircraft about its vertical
axis. This motion is called yaw. Like the other primary control
Because stabilators pivot around a central hinge point, they
surfaces, the rudder is a movable surface hinged to a fixed
are extremely sensitive to control inputs and aerodynamic
surface, in this case to the vertical stabilizer, or fin. Moving
loads. Antiservo tabs are incorporated on the trailing edge to
the left or right rudder pedal controls the rudder.
decrease sensitivity. They deflect in the same direction as the
stabilator. This results in an increase in the force required to
When the rudder is deflected into the airflow, a horizontal
move the stabilator, thus making it less prone to pilot-induced
force is exerted in the opposite direction. [Figure 5-15] By
overcontrolling. In addition, a balance weight is usually
pushing the left pedal, the rudder moves left. This alters the
incorporated in front of the main spar. The balance weight
airflow around the vertical stabilizer/rudder, and creates a
may project into the empennage or may be incorporated on
the forward portion of the stabilator tips. [Figure 5-13]
Canard
The canard design utilizes the concept of two lifting surfaces,
the canard functioning as a horizontal stabilizer located in
front of the main wings. In effect, the canard is an airfoil
similar to the horizontal surface on a conventional aft-tail
design. The difference is that the canard actually creates lift
and holds the nose up, as opposed to the aft-tail design which
exerts downward force on the tail to prevent the nose from
rotating downward. [Figure 5-14]
The canard design dates back to the pioneer days of aviation,
most notably used on the Wright Flyer. Recently, the canard
configuration has regained popularity and is appearing on Figure 5-14. The Piaggio P180 includes a variable-sweep canard
newer aircraft. Canard designs include two types–one with a design, which provides longitudinal stability about the lateral
horizontal surface of about the same size as a normal aft-tail axis.
5-7
8. sideward lift that moves the tail to the right and yaws the nose When both rudder and elevator controls are moved by the
of the airplane to the left. Rudder effectiveness increases with pilot, a control mixing mechanism moves each surface the
speed; therefore, large deflections at low speeds and small appropriate amount. The control system for the V-tail is
deflections at high speeds may be required to provide the more complex than that required for a conventional tail. In
desired reaction. In propeller-driven aircraft, any slipstream addition, the V-tail design is more susceptible to Dutch roll
flowing over the rudder increases its effectiveness. tendencies than a conventional tail, and total reduction in
drag is minimal.
Yaw
Secondary Flight Controls
Secondary flight control systems may consist of wing flaps,
leading edge devices, spoilers, and trim systems.
Left rudder forward
Flaps
CG
Flaps are the most common high-lift devices used on aircraft.
These surfaces, which are attached to the trailing edge of
the wing, increase both lift and induced drag for any given
AOA. Flaps allow a compromise between high cruising speed
and low landing speed, because they may be extended when
needed, and retracted into the wing’s structure when not
needed. There are four common types of flaps: plain, split,
slotted, and Fowler flaps. [Figure 5-17]
Left rudder
Ae
rod The plain flap is the simplest of the four types. It increases
ynamic force
the airfoil camber, resulting in a significant increase in the
coefficient of lift (CL) at a given AOA. At the same time,
Figure 5-11. The effect of left rudder pressure.
Figure 5-15. The effect of left rudder pressure.
it greatly increases drag and moves the center of pressure
(CP) aft on the airfoil, resulting in a nose-down pitching
V-Tail moment.
The V-tail design utilizes two slanted tail surfaces to perform
the same functions as the surfaces of a conventional elevator The split flap is deflected from the lower surface of the airfoil
and rudder configuration. The fixed surfaces act as both and produces a slightly greater increase in lift than the plain
horizontal and vertical stabilizers. [Figure 5-16] flap. More drag is created because of the turbulent air pattern
produced behind the airfoil. When fully extended, both plain
and split flaps produce high drag with little additional lift.
The most popular flap on aircraft today is the slotted flap.
Variations of this design are used for small aircraft, as well
as for large ones. Slotted flaps increase the lift coefficient
significantly more than plain or split flaps. On small aircraft,
the hinge is located below the lower surface of the flap, and
when the flap is lowered, a duct forms between the flap well
in the wing and the leading edge of the flap. When the slotted
flap is lowered, high energy air from the lower surface is
ducted to the flap’s upper surface. The high energy air from
the slot accelerates the upper surface boundary layer and
delays airflow separation, providing a higher CL. Thus, the
Figure 5-16. Beechcraft Bonanza V35. slotted flap produces much greater increases in maximum
coefficient of lift (CL-MAX) than the plain or split flap. While
The movable surfaces, which are usually called ruddervators, there are many types of slotted flaps, large aircraft often
are connected through a special linkage that allows the control have double- and even triple-slotted flaps. These allow the
wheel to move both surfaces simultaneously. On the other maximum increase in drag without the airflow over the flaps
hand, displacement of the rudder pedals moves the surfaces separating and destroying the lift they produce.
differentially, thereby providing directional control.
5-8
9. Basic section Leading Edge Devices
High-lift devices also can be applied to the leading edge of
the airfoil. The most common types are fixed slots, movable
slats, leading edge flaps, and cuffs. [Figure 5-18]
Fixed slot
Plain flap
Movable slot
Split flap
Slotted flap Leading edge flap
Fowler flap
Leading edge cuff
Slotted Fowler flap
Figure 5-18. Leading edge high lift devices.
Fixed slots direct airflow to the upper wing surface and delay
airflow separation at higher angles of attack. The slot does
Figure 5-17. Five common types of flaps. not increase the wing camber, but allows a higher maximum
CL because the stall is delayed until the wing reaches a
Fowler flaps are a type of slotted flap. This flap design not greater AOA.
only changes the camber of the wing, it also increases the
wing area. Instead of rotating down on a hinge, it slides Movable slats consist of leading edge segments, which move
backwards on tracks. In the first portion of its extension, it on tracks. At low angles of attack, each slat is held flush
increases the drag very little, but increases the lift a great deal against the wing’s leading edge by the high pressure that forms
as it increases both the area and camber. As the extension at the wing’s leading edge. As the AOA increases, the high-
continues, the flap deflects downward. During the last portion pressure area moves aft below the lower surface of the wing,
of its travel, the flap increases the drag with little additional allowing the slats to move forward. Some slats, however, are
increase in lift.
5-9
10. pilot operated and can be deployed at any AOA. Opening a
slat allows the air below the wing to flow over the wing’s
upper surface, delaying airflow separation.
Leading edge flaps, like trailing edge flaps, are used to
increase both CL-MAX and the camber of the wings. This type
of leading edge device is frequently used in conjunction with
trailing edge flaps and can reduce the nose-down pitching
movement produced by the latter. As is true with trailing edge
flaps, a small increment of leading edge flaps increases lift to
a much greater extent than drag. As greater amounts of flaps
are extended, drag increases at a greater rate than lift.
Leading edge cuffs, like leading edge flaps and trailing edge
Figure 5-19. Spoilers reduce lift and increase drag during descent
flaps are used to increase both CL-MAX and the camber of
and landing.
the wings. Unlike leading edge flaps and trailing edge flaps,
leading edge cuffs are fixed aerodynamic devices. In most tabs, balance tabs, antiservo tabs, ground adjustable tabs, and
cases leading edge cuffs extend the leading edge down and an adjustable stabilizer.
forward. This causes the airflow to attach better to the upper
surface of the wing at higher angles of attack, thus lowering Trim Tabs
an aircraft’s stall speed. The fixed nature of leading edge
The most common installation on small aircraft is a single
cuffs extracts a penalty in maximum cruise airspeed, but
trim tab attached to the trailing edge of the elevator. Most trim
recent advances in design and technology have reduced this
tabs are manually operated by a small, vertically mounted
penalty.
control wheel. However, a trim crank may be found in some
aircraft. The flight deck control includes a trim tab position
Spoilers
indicator. Placing the trim control in the full nose-down
Found on many gliders and some aircraft, high drag devices position moves the trim tab to its full up position. With
called spoilers are deployed from the wings to spoil the smooth the trim tab up and into the airstream, the airflow over the
airflow, reducing lift and increasing drag. On gliders, spoilers horizontal tail surface tends to force the trailing edge of the
are most often used to control rate of descent for accurate elevator down. This causes the tail of the airplane to move
landings. On other aircraft, spoilers are often used for roll up, and the nose to move down. [Figure 5-20]
control, an advantage of which is the elimination of adverse
yaw. To turn right, for example, the spoiler on the right wing If the trim tab is set to the full nose-up position, the tab moves
is raised, destroying some of the lift and creating more drag on to its full down position. In this case, the air flowing under
the right. The right wing drops, and the aircraft banks and yaws the horizontal tail surface hits the tab and forces the trailing
to the right. Deploying spoilers on both wings at the same time edge of the elevator up, reducing the elevator’s AOA. This
allows the aircraft to descend without gaining speed. Spoilers causes the tail of the airplane to move down, and the nose
are also deployed to help reduce ground roll after landing. By to move up.
destroying lift, they transfer weight to the wheels, improving
braking effectiveness. [Figure 5-19] In spite of the opposing directional movement of the trim
tab and the elevator, control of trim is natural to a pilot. If
Trim Systems the pilot needs to exert constant back pressure on a control
Although an aircraft can be operated throughout a wide range column, the need for nose-up trim is indicated. The normal
of attitudes, airspeeds, and power settings, it can be designed trim procedure is to continue trimming until the aircraft is
to fly hands-off within only a very limited combination of balanced and the nose-heavy condition is no longer apparent.
these variables. Trim systems are used to relieve the pilot of Pilots normally establish the desired power, pitch attitude,
the need to maintain constant pressure on the flight controls, and configuration first, and then trim the aircraft to relieve
and usually consist of flight deck controls and small hinged control pressures that may exist for that flight condition.
devices attached to the trailing edge of one or more of the Any time power, pitch attitude, or configuration is changed,
primary flight control surfaces. Designed to help minimize expect that retrimming will be necessary to relieve the control
a pilot’s workload, trim systems aerodynamically assist pressures for the new flight condition.
movement and position of the flight control surface to which
they are attached. Common types of trim systems include trim
5-10
11. Nose-down trim stabilator moves up, the linkage forces the trailing edge of the
tab up. When the stabilator moves down, the tab also moves
down. Conversely, trim tabs on elevators move opposite of
Elevator
the control surface. [Figure 5-21]
Trim tab
Tab up—elevator down
Nose-up trim
Elevator Stabilator
Trim tab
Pivot point
Antiservo tab
Tab down—elevator up
Figure 5-20. The movement of the elevator is opposite to the
direction 5-16. The movement of the trim tab. is opposite to the Figure 5-21. An antiservo tab attempts to streamline the control
Figure of movement of the elevator elevator Figure 5-17. An antiservo tab attempts to streamline the
direction of movement of the elevator trim tab. surface and is used tois usedthe stabilator less sensitive by opposing
control surface and make to make the stabilator less sensitive
Balance Tabs theopposing the force exerted by the pilot.
by force exerted by the pilot.
The control forces may be excessively high in some aircraft,
and, in order to decrease them, the manufacturer may use Ground Adjustable Tabs
balance tabs. They look like trim tabs and are hinged in Many small aircraft have a nonmovable metal trim tab on the
approximately the same places as trim tabs. The essential rudder. This tab is bent in one direction or the other while on
difference between the two is that the balancing tab is coupled the ground to apply a trim force to the rudder. The correct
to the control surface rod so that when the primary control displacement is determined by trial and error. Usually, small
surface is moved in any direction, the tab automatically adjustments are necessary until the aircraft no longer skids
moves in the opposite direction. The airflow striking the tab left or right during normal cruising flight. [Figure 5-22]
counterbalances some of the air pressure against the primary
control surface, and enables the pilot to move more easily
and hold the control surface in position.
If the linkage between the balance tab and the fixed surface is
adjustable from the flight deck, the tab acts as a combination
trim and balance tab that can be adjusted to any desired
deflection.
Antiservo Tabs
Antiservo tabs work in the same manner as balance tabs
except, instead of moving in the opposite direction, they move
in the same direction as the trailing edge of the stabilator.
In addition to decreasing the sensitivity of the stabilator, an
antiservo tab also functions as a trim device to relieve control
pressure and maintain the stabilator in the desired position. Figure 5-22. A ground adjustable tab is used on the rudder of many
The fixed end of the linkage is on the opposite side of the small airplanes to correct for a tendency to fly with the fuselage
surface from the horn on the tab; when the trailing edge of the slightly misaligned with the relative wind.
5-11
12. Adjustable Stabilizer
Rather than using a movable tab on the trailing edge of the
elevator, some aircraft have an adjustable stabilizer. With this
arrangement, linkages pivot the horizontal stabilizer about its
rear spar. This is accomplished by use of a jackscrew mounted
on the leading edge of the stabilator. [Figure 5-23]
Adjustable stabilizer
Nose down
Nose up Jackscrew
Pivot
Figure 5-24. Basic autopilot system integrated into the flight
control system.
Trim motor or trim cable The autopilot system also incorporates a disconnect safety
feature to disengage the system automatically or manually.
Figure 5-19. Some airplanes, including most jet transports,
Figure 5-23. Some airplanes, including most jet transports, use an These autopilots work with inertial navigation systems,
adjustable stabilizer to provide the required required pitch trim
use an adjustable stabilizer to provide the pitch trim forces. global positioning systems (GPS), and flight computers to
forces.
control the aircraft. In fly-by-wire systems, the autopilot is
On small aircraft, the jackscrew is cable operated with a trim an integrated component.
wheel or crank. On larger aircraft, it is motor driven. The
trimming effect and flight deck indications for an adjustable Additionally, autopilots can be manually overridden. Because
stabilizer are similar to those of a trim tab. autopilot systems differ widely in their operation, refer to the
autopilot operating instructions in the Airplane Flight Manual
Autopilot (AFM) or the Pilot’s Operating Handbook (POH).
Autopilot is an automatic flight control system that keeps an
Chapter Summary
aircraft in level flight or on a set course. It can be directed by
the pilot, or it may be coupled to a radio navigation signal. Because flight control systems and aerodynamic characteristics
Autopilot reduces the physical and mental demands on a pilot vary greatly between aircraft, it is essential that a pilot
and increases safety. The common features available on an become familiar with the primary and secondary flight
autopilot are altitude and heading hold. control systems of the aircraft being flown. The primary
source of this information is the AFM or the POH. Various
The simplest systems use gyroscopic attitude indicators and manufacturer and owner group websites can also be a
magnetic compasses to control servos connected to the flight valuable source of additional information.
control system. [Figure 5-24] The number and location of
these servos depends on the complexity of the system. For
example, a single-axis autopilot controls the aircraft about the
longitudinal axis and a servo actuates the ailerons. A three-
axis autopilot controls the aircraft about the longitudinal,
lateral, and vertical axes. Three different servos actuate
ailerons, elevator, and rudder. More advanced systems often
include a vertical speed and/or indicated airspeed hold mode.
Advanced autopilot systems are coupled to navigational aids
through a flight director.
5-12