1
Structured
Observation
Prof.Dr.Chinna Chadayan.N
RN.RM., B.Sc (N)., M.Sc (N)., Ph.D (N).,
Professor
Enam Nursing College
M.Sc (N) I year
Unit 16c
Structured Observation
1
Structured observation
• In structured observation the researcher directly observes some
phenomenon, and then systematically records the resulting observations.
• The researcher decides in advance what types of behavior they’re looking
for.
• They come up with an observation checklist to complete during the
observation.
• They tally the number of times a particular behavior occurs.
• This produces quantitative data
• A coding system is also worked out sometimes.
• Event sampling and time sampling can take place in this type of
observation
2
Concept
1. Observation means watching carefully.
2. All the things, situations we are seeing in our routine life,
are not observation. (casual & without any purpose)
3. Observation is being done systematically with a definite
purpose.
4. In the process of observation the observer uses all his
sensory organs in an integrated manner.
5. The observer obtains information about the World
around him for a definite purpose.
6. This is one of the oldest method for collecting the data
and used by both the scientists and social scientists.
3
Tools of Structured Observation
Structured observation is a quantitative research
methodology that has been used by the social sciences for several
years.
Observation tools, checklists, or rubrics may be used by observers
to record notes about the phenomena.
4
5
ADVANTAGES:
1. Getting non-biased responses from the responds.
2. Independent the respondent’s willing to respond.
3. Provide accurate and realistic data as it is based on firsthand
experience.
4. Helps the researchers in getting the relevant data.
5. Obtained the currently happing data
6
DISADVANTAGES:
1. Expensive Methodology
2. Slowness of Investigation
3. Don’t allow the researchers to evaluate the past
data.
4. The Researchers can not present at everyplace when
a new event occurs.
5. Some observations can’t be treated as objects of
observation. 7
Thank u
8

Structured Observation .pptx

  • 1.
    1 Structured Observation Prof.Dr.Chinna Chadayan.N RN.RM., B.Sc(N)., M.Sc (N)., Ph.D (N)., Professor Enam Nursing College M.Sc (N) I year Unit 16c Structured Observation 1
  • 2.
    Structured observation • Instructured observation the researcher directly observes some phenomenon, and then systematically records the resulting observations. • The researcher decides in advance what types of behavior they’re looking for. • They come up with an observation checklist to complete during the observation. • They tally the number of times a particular behavior occurs. • This produces quantitative data • A coding system is also worked out sometimes. • Event sampling and time sampling can take place in this type of observation 2
  • 3.
    Concept 1. Observation meanswatching carefully. 2. All the things, situations we are seeing in our routine life, are not observation. (casual & without any purpose) 3. Observation is being done systematically with a definite purpose. 4. In the process of observation the observer uses all his sensory organs in an integrated manner. 5. The observer obtains information about the World around him for a definite purpose. 6. This is one of the oldest method for collecting the data and used by both the scientists and social scientists. 3
  • 4.
    Tools of StructuredObservation Structured observation is a quantitative research methodology that has been used by the social sciences for several years. Observation tools, checklists, or rubrics may be used by observers to record notes about the phenomena. 4
  • 5.
  • 6.
    ADVANTAGES: 1. Getting non-biasedresponses from the responds. 2. Independent the respondent’s willing to respond. 3. Provide accurate and realistic data as it is based on firsthand experience. 4. Helps the researchers in getting the relevant data. 5. Obtained the currently happing data 6
  • 7.
    DISADVANTAGES: 1. Expensive Methodology 2.Slowness of Investigation 3. Don’t allow the researchers to evaluate the past data. 4. The Researchers can not present at everyplace when a new event occurs. 5. Some observations can’t be treated as objects of observation. 7
  • 8.