This document provides guidance on publishing a journal article. It discusses the common structure of journal articles, including sections like the abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, acknowledgments, and references. Key points covered include the purpose of each section, what information should be included, appropriate word counts and formatting. The document also reviews the overall process of publishing, including initial submission, peer review, responding to reviewer feedback, proofreading, and celebrating once published. The intended audience appears to be researchers or students looking to publish their first academic article.

1. GUIDE
PRESENTER
DR.GIRISH.K.J
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
DEPT OF KAYA CHIKITSA
DR. THRIJIL KRISHNAN. E . M
PG SCHOLAR DEPT OF
SHAREERA RACHANA

2.  An article is a written work published in a print or
electronic medium. It may be for the purpose of
propagating the news, research results, academic
analysis or debate.
 Journal - a daily record of events
 in the literal sense of one published each day
 a private journal is usually referred to as a diary

3. TYPES OF ARTICLES
 ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLEEXPERIMENTAL
 ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE- CLINICAL
 REVIEW
 CASE SERIES
 CASE STUDIES
 GENERAL ARTICLE
 EDITORIAL
 LEADERSHIP
 LETTERS
 SHORT COMMUNICATION

4. A Common Format for
Journal Articles: IMRAD
 Introduction: What was the




question?
Methods:
answer it?
Results:
And
Discussion:
How did you try to
What did you find?
What does it mean?

5. A More Complete View









Title
Authors
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Acknowledgments
References

6. Some Other Structures
 Variants of IMRAD—for example, with
 a literature review section after the introduction,
 a combined results and discussion section, or
 a conclusions section added
 Essay-like format, with subheadings chosen by
the author
 Other
 What have you found to be the usual structure(s)
of journal articles in your research area?

7.  The fewest possible words that adequately indicate the





contents of the paper
Important in literature searching
Should not include extra words
Should be specific enough
Generally should not include abbreviations
(Running title: short version of title—appears at tops of
pages)

Title NOT ALL CAPITALS, not underlined.

8.  Those with important intellectual
contributions to the work
 Often listed from greatest contributions to
least
 In some fields, head of research group often is
listed last
 In some fields, listed alphabetically
 Important to list one’s name the same way on
every paper

9. The Abstract
 An important part of the paper
 Relatively widely read
 Used to decide whether to read the rest of the paper
 Gives editors, reviewers, others a first impression
 Briefly summarizes the paper
 Should be organized like the paper (for example, in
sort of a mini-IMRAD format)
 In some fields, there are structured abstracts (with
standardized headings).
 Structured Abstract, Words: approximately 250

10. THE INTRODUCTION

11. Purposes of the Introduction
 To provide background
 In order to help readers understand the paper
 In order to help readers appreciate the importance
of the research
 To identify the question(s) the research
addressed
 Sometimes stated as a hypothesis or hypotheses

12. Length of Introduction
 Articles in some fields tend to have short
introductions (a few paragraphs or less)
 Articles in some other fields tend to have long
introductions or to also include related
sections (for example, literature review,
theoretical framework)
 What about introductions in your field?

13. Gearing the Introduction
to the Audience
 Papers in relatively general journals:
Introduction must provide basic background
information.
 Papers in specialized journals in your field:
Introduction can assume that readers have
more knowledge about the field.

14. Structure of the
Introduction
 Introduction typically should be funnel-
shaped, moving from general to specific
 A common structure:
 Information on importance of topic
 Highlights of relevant previous research
 Identification of unanswered question(s)
 Approach you used to seek the answer(s)
 (In some fields) your main findings

15. METHODS

16. Purposes of the Methods Section
 To allow others to replicate what you did
 In order to test it
 In order to do further research
 To allow others to evaluate what you did
 To determine whether the conclusions seem valid
 To determine whether the findings seem
applicable to other situations

17. Methods: Basic Information
to Include
 In most cases, overview of study design
 Identification of (if applicable)
 Equipment, organisms, reagents, etc used (and
sources thereof)
 Populations
 Approval of human or animal research by an
appropriate committee
 Statistical methods

18. Methods: Amount of Detail to
Use
 For well-known methods: name of method,
citation of reference
 For methods previously described but not
well known: brief description of method,
citation of reference
 For methods that you yourself devise:
relatively detailed description

19. Methods: The Words and More
 Should be written in past tense
 In some journals, may include subheads
(which can help readers)
 May include tables and figures—for example:
 Flowcharts
 Diagrams of apparatus
 Tables of experimental conditions

20. A Suggestion
Look at the Methods sections of some papers in
your target journal. Use them as models.

21. RESULTS

22. The Results Section
 The core of the paper
 Often includes tables, figures, or both
 Should summarize findings rather than
providing data in great detail
 Should present results but not comment on
them
 (Note: Some journals combine the Results
and the Discussion.)

23. Verb Tense for the Results
Section:
Past Tense
Examples:
 A total of 417 of the customers replied.
 _____ increased, but _____ decreased.
 The average temperature was _____.
 Three of the dogs died.
 This difference was not statistically significant.

24. Results Sections of Papers
with Tables or Figures
 How much should the information in the text
overlap that in the tables and figures?
 Not extensive overlap
 In general, text should present only the main
points from the tables and figures
 Perhaps also include a few of the most important
data
 Remember to mention each table or figure.
Do so as soon as readers might want to see it.

25. Mentioning Tables and Figures:
Some Writing Advice
 In citing tables and figures, emphasize the
finding, not the table or figure.
 Not so good: Table 3 shows that researchers who
attended the workshop published twice as many
papers per year.
 Better: Researchers who attended the workshop
published twice as many papers per year (Table 3).

26. Tables: A Few Suggestions
 Use tables only if text will not suffice.
 Design tables to be understandable without
the text.
 If a paper includes a series of tables, use the
same format for each.
 Be sure to follow the instructions to authors.

27. Figures: A Few Suggestions
 Use figures (graphs, diagrams, maps,
photographs, etc) only if they will help
convey your information.
 Avoid including too much information in one
figure.
 Make sure any lettering will be large enough
once published.
 Follow the journal’s instructions.

28. DISCUSSION

29. Discussion
 One of the more difficult parts to write,
because have more choice of what to say
 Often should begin with a brief summary of
the main findings
 Should answer the question(s) stated in the
introduction
 Sometimes is followed by a conclusions
section

30. The Discussion:
Some Possible Content
 Strengths of the study
 For example, superior methods, extensive data
 Limitations of the study
 For example: small sample size, short follow-up,
incomplete data, possible sources of bias, problems
with experimental procedures
 Better to mention limitations than for peer reviewers
and readers to think that you’re unaware of them
 If the limitations seem unlikely to affect the
conclusions, can explain why

31. The Discussion:
Possible Content (cont)
 Relationship to findings of other research—
for example:
 Similarities to previous findings (your own,
others’, or both)
 Differences from previous findings
 Possible reasons for similarities and differences

32. The Discussion:
Possible Content (cont)
 Applications and implications—for example:
 Possible uses of the findings (in business, public
policy, agriculture, medicine, etc)
 Relationship of the findings to theories or models:
 Do the findings support them?
 Do they refute them?
 Do they suggest modifications?

33. The Discussion:
Possible Content (cont)
 Other research needed—for example:
 To address questions still unanswered
 To address new questions raised by the findings
 Other

34. The Discussion: Structure
 Typically should move from specific to
general (opposite of introduction)
 Beware of excessive length

35. Acknowledgments
 The place to thank people who contributed to
the research but whose contributions don’t
qualify them for authorship
 Obtain permission before listing people
 Sometimes also the place to mention sources
of financial support

36. REFERENCES

37. Functions of References
 To give credit to others for their work
 To add credibility to your work by showing
that you used valid information sources
 To help show how your work relates to
previous work
 To help readers find further information

38. References:
Importance of Accuracy
 Studies show that many references are
inaccurate.
 For references to fulfill their functions, they
must be accurate. Therefore
 Make sure that you accurately state what the cited
material says.
 Make sure that all information in the citation (for
example, author list, article title, journal title,
volume, year, pages) is accurate.

39. styles
APA style
MLA style
Bluebook
ALWD Citation Manual
ASA style
Harvard referencing
Vancouver system
The Chicago Manual of Style

41. Before Submitting Your Paper
 Make sure the abstract is consistent with the
rest of your paper.
 Revise, revise, revise the paper.
 Show the paper to other people, and revise it
some more.
 Re-check the journal’s instructions to authors.

42. Some General Research-Writing
Resources
 English Communication for Scientists
(http://www.nature.com/scitable/ebooks/english
-communication-for-scientists-14053993)
 OneLook Dictionary Search (www.onelook.com)
 Academic Phrasebank
(www.phrasebank.manchester.ac.uk)
 Grammar Girl (grammar.quickanddirtytips.com)
 Advice on Designing Scientific Posters
(www.swarthmore.edu/NatSci/cpurrin1/posterad
vice.htm)

43. Some publisher
 AYU – Gujarat Ayurveda University
 Ancient science of life – Coimbatore
 Aushadi – Mumbai
 International journal of ayurveda and research
- AYUSH
- Global Ayurveda – Kochi
- Ayurvaidya – Pune
- Journal Of Research & Education In Indian
Medicine - Varanasi

44. EXAMPLE….
 HOW TO PUBLISH A JOURNEL IN JAIM

49. 
Covering letter
To,
The Editor-in-Chief,
Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine (J-AIM)
Sub: Submission of Manuscript for publication in J-AIM
Dear Sir,
We intend to publish an article entitled ‘
’ in your journal as a ‘
’.
On behalf of all the contributors I will act and guarantor and will correspond with the journal from this point onward.
Prior Publications/presentations details of this work :

Publication Details:

Presentation at:

Organisation

Place:

Date:
Support/Funding :
Conflicts of interest :
Permissions:
We also agree to provide post-publication update on this review article.
We have done sufficient work in the field to justify authorship for this review article.

We hereby transfer, assign, or otherwise convey all copyright ownership, including any and all rights incidental
thereto, exclusively to the journal, in the event that such work is published by the journal.


Thanking you,

Yours’ sincerely,


50. 
Corresponding Author:

Name:

Address:

Mobile No.:

Phone No.:

E-mail:

Conrtibutor’s Details
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
:
Name
Highest Academic
Qualification
Affiliation

51. Contribution Details :
(Copy and paste this tick-mark symbol wherever applicable):
C: Contributor

52.  Total number of pages:
 Word counts:
 For the abstract:
 for the main text:
 Total number of photographs:
 Name of the Institution where the work was primarily carried out:
 Ethical Committee Approval: Yes / No
 Clinical Trial Registration No.:
 Running title:
 Acknowledgement:

53. Process of article publication
Completion of research
Preparation of manuscript
Submission of manuscript
Assignment and review
Decision
Rejection
Revision
Resubmission
Re-review
Acceptance
Publication
Rejection

54. Initial Screening by the
Journal
 For appropriateness of subject matter
 For compliance with instructions
 For overall quality (sometimes)
 For importance (sometimes)
 Desk reject

55. Peer Review
 Evaluation by experts in the field
 Purposes:
 To help the editor decide whether to publish the
paper
 To help the authors improve the paper, whether or
not the journal accepts it

56. The Editor’s Decision
 Based on the peer reviewers’ advice, the
editor’s own evaluation, the amount of space
in the journal, other factors
 Options:
 Accept as is (rare)
 Accept if suitably revised
 Reconsider if revised
 Reject

57. Revising a Paper
 Revise and resubmit promptly.
 Indicate what revisions were made. Typically:
 Include a letter saying what revisions were made. If
you received a list of requested revisions, address each
in the letter.
 If requested, show revisions in Track Changes.
 If you disagree with a requested revision, explain
why in your letter. Try to find a different way to
solve the problem that the editor or reviewer
identified.

58. WHY PAPERS ARE REJECTED:
1. general
 issue not important
 not original
 not appropriate for journal
 data old & now irrelevant
 practical difficulties -> doubtful results
 conflict of interest
 ethical issues

59. WHY PAPERS ARE REJECTED:
2. scientific
 unclear hypotheses
 poor or weak design
 sample biased or too small
 statistics inappropriate or misapplied
 conclusions unjustified
 references outdated

60. WHY PAPERS ARE REJECTED:
3. presentation/style
 poorly organized
 badly written
 careless errors
 terrible tables
 needless figures
 outdated or improperly cited references

61. Answering Queries
 Queries: questions from the manuscript
editor
 Some topics of queries:




Inconsistencies
Missing information
Ambiguities
Other
 Advice: Respond promptly, politely, and
completely yet concisely.

62. Reviewing Proofs
 Proofs: type set material to check
 Some things to check:
 Completeness (presence of all components)
 Accuracy (absence of typographical errors in text
and references)
 Placement of figures and tables
 Quality of reproduction of figures
 Note: This is not the time to rewrite the
paper.

63. A Final Step
Celebrate
Publication of
Your Paper!
“There
is no way to get experience except through
experience.”

64. Go through these……… articles
 WRITING AND PUBLISHING JOURNAL
ARTICLES- Barbara Gastel, MD,
 TIPS FOR WRITING SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL
ARTICLES- Dr Pekka Belt, Dr Matti Mottonen
& Dr Janne Harkonen
 GUDLINE FOR WRITING A FIRST ACADEMIC
ARTICLE- university of prectoria