How To Write a Scientific Paper
Dr. Ghizal Fatima (P.hD)
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
Era’s Medical College and Hospitals,
Lucknow
*submitted
What is a Scientific Paper
A scientific paper is a written and published report
describing original research results
Ideally it is
• To share the new discoveries in science, to improve the
quality of life & for providing better healthcare.
• Make contributions to society
More often is
• To get the research funding/grants
• To improve the scientific impact of institute
• To get the job
• To get promotions
Why publishing scientific paper is important
•Publication in a reputable, peer reviewed journal
should be the goal, as this provides the most effective
means of disseminating information to a large
audience.
• Before writing a first draft, it is important to
establish that the topic of the manuscript is likely to
be consistent with the focus of the journal.
The Very First Step
•Having first selected a journal, it is essential to follow the
guidelines for authors.
•Guidelines are specific & include rules for word limit,
organization of manuscript, line spacing, preparation of
tables, figures & method to cite references.
•Failure to comply with the guidelines may result in
rejection or return of the manuscript for correction,
thereby delaying the process of review and publication.
Writing the Manuscript
•The art of writing a manuscript improves with practice &
considerable help may be gained by asking others,
especially those who have published.
•Getting started is often the most difficult part & for this
reason it is best to begin with the easiest sections. These
are usually the methods & results, followed by the
discussion, conclusion, introduction, references & title,
leaving the abstract until last.
•Try & set aside some time for writing on consecutive
days.
•Long gaps between periods of writing interrupts the
continuity of thought.
•Try to write quickly, to keep the flow going.
•Use abbreviations & leave space for words that do not
come to mind immediately.
•Having finished the first draft, immediately revise it & be
prepared to do this several times until you feel it is not
possible to improve it further.
In order to maintain continuity between the key sections
(introduction, methods, results and discussion) it is helpful
to consider the manuscript as telling a story.
The strong parts to the story-line is the introduction and
the discussion so the link between these sections must be
very clear.
The research question which is posed as the need of the
introduction must be answered at the beginning of the
Discussion.
Key Points
Structure and Content of a Manuscript
A manuscript is typically composed of a number of
sections:
-Title
- Abstract
- Key Words
- Introduction
- Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Conclusions and
- References
Introduction
What question was studied?
Methods
How was the question studied?
Results
What was found?
Discussion
What do the results mean?
Title
• Max info in least words
• <12 words
• <100 characters
• Should almost never contain abbreviations
• Easier to understand, more impactful
• State results
•This provides the first impression to the reader, so select the
most appropriate title. Attractive and Catchy Title; makes
reader go through the article for sure.
•Include essential words in right order such that the topic of the
manuscript is accurately and fully conveyed. (e.g. clearly
related to the purpose of the study)
Abstract
•Brief summary (of specified word limit) of the manuscript.
Provide highlights from the introduction, methods, results,
discussion and conclusions.
•Abstract is important as many computerized searchers
only retrieve the abstract.
•Words should be simple, abbreviations omitted except for
standard units of measurement & statistical terms.
•Citations not included.
Key Words
 Journals require the author to identify 3 or 4 key
words which represent major concept of paper.
These are used for indexing purposes.
Introduction
 The purpose of introduction is to stimulate
reader’s interest & to provide background
information which is pertinent to the study.
 Research question is the most important part of
the intro.
Intro.
 Background to the topic
 What is known about the topic
 What is still unknown or problematic
 Findings of relevant studies
 Importance of the topic
References are almost exclusively used in the
intro. references cited should be those which are
most valid. Avoid citing unpublished reports.
These are not strong evidence because they are
unable to be accessed.
Methods
 This section is descriptive.
 Main consideration, to ensure enough detail is
provided to verify the findings.
 Sub-headings should be used, where appropriate.
Many journals require mention of relevant ethics
committee approval for study & subjects gave
informed consent.
Subjects
 Method of sampling and recruitment
 Number of subjects
 Justification of sample size.
 Inclusion, exclusion
Materials
 Equipment, instruments or measurement tools
(include model number & manufacturer).
Procedures
 Detailed description, in chronological order, of
exactly what was done.
 In this section you describe how you performed your study
 It's helpful to both writer and reader to organize this section
chronologically: that is, describe each procedure in the order it
was performed.
 For example, DNA-extraction, purification, amplification,
assay, detection. Or, study area, study population, sampling
technique, variables studied, analysis method.
• Write the methods section first because it is the easiest to
write.
• Start writing when experiments still in progress
• Supplies, manufacturer, country needs to be added, Animal,
human, protections details, Measurements/ instruments.
• Statistical analysis and data collection
Statistical Analyses
 Methods used to summarize data.
 Statistical software (name, version)
 Statistical tests & what was compared
 Critical alpha probability (p) value at which
differences/relationships were considered to be statistically
significant.
Results
 Data in the form of text, tables or figures supports the results
 Include only those results which are relevant to the question(s)
posed in the introduction.
 Tables and figures, present the details whereas the narrative
section of the results tends to be used to present the general
findings.
 Clear tables and figures provide a very powerful visual means
of presenting data and should be used to complement the text.
 This section responds to the question "What have
you found?" Hence, only representative results from
your research should be presented. The results should
be essential for discussion.
 Careful planning of the tables and figures is
important to ensure that the sequencing of these tells
a story.
 Tables generally should report summary-level data,
such as means±standard deviations, rather than all
your raw data.
 An important issue is that you must not include
references in this section; you are presenting your
results, so you cannot refer to others here.
 If you refer to others, is because you are discussing
your results, and this must be included in the
Discussion section.
Discussion
 The discussion should be considered as the heart of the paper
& invariably requires several attempts at writing.
 It serves to answer the question(s) posed in the introduction,
explain how the results support the answers and how the
answers fit in with existing knowledge on the topic.
 This is the main section in which the author can express your
interpretations & opinions, for example how important the
author thinks the results are, the author’s suggestions for
future research and the clinical implications of the findings
 Answer to the question posed in the intro. With
accompanying support, explanation with reference to
published literature.
Explanations of:
 How the findings concur with those of others.
 Any discrepancies of the results with those of others.
 The limitations of the study which may affect the
study validity or findings.
 Importance of the work e.g. clinical significance
 Recommendations for further research
Conclusions
 This section must comprise a brief statement of the major
findings & Implications of the study.
 It is not the function of this section to summarise the study;
this is the purpose of the abstract.
 New information must not be included in the conclusion part.
• Should not be a summary of the work done- abstract is doing
fine with that.
Acknowledgements
 All important contributors should be acknowledged, for eg.
persons who provided statistical or technical advice &
assistance.
 Those who helped with recruitment & with the preparation of
the manuscript.
 If the research was supported by a grant, then the name of the
funding body must be included.
 For eg. The authors thanks Dr…….and Dr…. for their help in
reviewing this manuscript.
References
 Cite current and key pertinent references
 Reference citations must be accurate and complete
 Read the references
 Use correct style for journal
Section Purpose
Title Clearly describes contents
Authors Ensures recognition for the writer(s)
Abstract Describes what was done
Key Words (some journals)
Ensures the article is correctly
identified in abstracting and indexing
services
Introduction Explains the problem
Methods Explains how the data were collected
Results Describes what was discovered
Discussion
Discusses the implications of the
findings
Acknowledgements
Ensures those who helped in the
research are recognised
References
Ensures previously published work is
recognised
Appendices (some journals)
Provides supplemental data for the
expert reader
THANK YOU
Even very creative experiments and novel
results will have dull impact if the
manuscript is not written well.

How to write a scientific paper 27.11.16

  • 1.
    How To Writea Scientific Paper Dr. Ghizal Fatima (P.hD) ASSISTANT PROFESSOR Era’s Medical College and Hospitals, Lucknow *submitted
  • 2.
    What is aScientific Paper A scientific paper is a written and published report describing original research results
  • 3.
    Ideally it is •To share the new discoveries in science, to improve the quality of life & for providing better healthcare. • Make contributions to society More often is • To get the research funding/grants • To improve the scientific impact of institute • To get the job • To get promotions Why publishing scientific paper is important
  • 4.
    •Publication in areputable, peer reviewed journal should be the goal, as this provides the most effective means of disseminating information to a large audience. • Before writing a first draft, it is important to establish that the topic of the manuscript is likely to be consistent with the focus of the journal. The Very First Step
  • 5.
    •Having first selecteda journal, it is essential to follow the guidelines for authors. •Guidelines are specific & include rules for word limit, organization of manuscript, line spacing, preparation of tables, figures & method to cite references. •Failure to comply with the guidelines may result in rejection or return of the manuscript for correction, thereby delaying the process of review and publication.
  • 6.
    Writing the Manuscript •Theart of writing a manuscript improves with practice & considerable help may be gained by asking others, especially those who have published. •Getting started is often the most difficult part & for this reason it is best to begin with the easiest sections. These are usually the methods & results, followed by the discussion, conclusion, introduction, references & title, leaving the abstract until last.
  • 7.
    •Try & setaside some time for writing on consecutive days. •Long gaps between periods of writing interrupts the continuity of thought. •Try to write quickly, to keep the flow going. •Use abbreviations & leave space for words that do not come to mind immediately. •Having finished the first draft, immediately revise it & be prepared to do this several times until you feel it is not possible to improve it further.
  • 8.
    In order tomaintain continuity between the key sections (introduction, methods, results and discussion) it is helpful to consider the manuscript as telling a story. The strong parts to the story-line is the introduction and the discussion so the link between these sections must be very clear. The research question which is posed as the need of the introduction must be answered at the beginning of the Discussion. Key Points
  • 9.
    Structure and Contentof a Manuscript A manuscript is typically composed of a number of sections: -Title - Abstract - Key Words - Introduction - Methods - Results - Discussion - Conclusions and - References
  • 10.
    Introduction What question wasstudied? Methods How was the question studied? Results What was found? Discussion What do the results mean?
  • 11.
    Title • Max infoin least words • <12 words • <100 characters • Should almost never contain abbreviations • Easier to understand, more impactful • State results •This provides the first impression to the reader, so select the most appropriate title. Attractive and Catchy Title; makes reader go through the article for sure. •Include essential words in right order such that the topic of the manuscript is accurately and fully conveyed. (e.g. clearly related to the purpose of the study)
  • 12.
    Abstract •Brief summary (ofspecified word limit) of the manuscript. Provide highlights from the introduction, methods, results, discussion and conclusions. •Abstract is important as many computerized searchers only retrieve the abstract. •Words should be simple, abbreviations omitted except for standard units of measurement & statistical terms. •Citations not included.
  • 13.
    Key Words  Journalsrequire the author to identify 3 or 4 key words which represent major concept of paper. These are used for indexing purposes.
  • 14.
    Introduction  The purposeof introduction is to stimulate reader’s interest & to provide background information which is pertinent to the study.  Research question is the most important part of the intro.
  • 15.
    Intro.  Background tothe topic  What is known about the topic  What is still unknown or problematic  Findings of relevant studies  Importance of the topic References are almost exclusively used in the intro. references cited should be those which are most valid. Avoid citing unpublished reports. These are not strong evidence because they are unable to be accessed.
  • 16.
    Methods  This sectionis descriptive.  Main consideration, to ensure enough detail is provided to verify the findings.  Sub-headings should be used, where appropriate. Many journals require mention of relevant ethics committee approval for study & subjects gave informed consent.
  • 17.
    Subjects  Method ofsampling and recruitment  Number of subjects  Justification of sample size.  Inclusion, exclusion Materials  Equipment, instruments or measurement tools (include model number & manufacturer). Procedures  Detailed description, in chronological order, of exactly what was done.
  • 18.
     In thissection you describe how you performed your study  It's helpful to both writer and reader to organize this section chronologically: that is, describe each procedure in the order it was performed.  For example, DNA-extraction, purification, amplification, assay, detection. Or, study area, study population, sampling technique, variables studied, analysis method.
  • 19.
    • Write themethods section first because it is the easiest to write. • Start writing when experiments still in progress • Supplies, manufacturer, country needs to be added, Animal, human, protections details, Measurements/ instruments. • Statistical analysis and data collection
  • 20.
    Statistical Analyses  Methodsused to summarize data.  Statistical software (name, version)  Statistical tests & what was compared  Critical alpha probability (p) value at which differences/relationships were considered to be statistically significant.
  • 21.
    Results  Data inthe form of text, tables or figures supports the results  Include only those results which are relevant to the question(s) posed in the introduction.  Tables and figures, present the details whereas the narrative section of the results tends to be used to present the general findings.  Clear tables and figures provide a very powerful visual means of presenting data and should be used to complement the text.
  • 22.
     This sectionresponds to the question "What have you found?" Hence, only representative results from your research should be presented. The results should be essential for discussion.  Careful planning of the tables and figures is important to ensure that the sequencing of these tells a story.
  • 23.
     Tables generallyshould report summary-level data, such as means±standard deviations, rather than all your raw data.  An important issue is that you must not include references in this section; you are presenting your results, so you cannot refer to others here.  If you refer to others, is because you are discussing your results, and this must be included in the Discussion section.
  • 24.
    Discussion  The discussionshould be considered as the heart of the paper & invariably requires several attempts at writing.  It serves to answer the question(s) posed in the introduction, explain how the results support the answers and how the answers fit in with existing knowledge on the topic.  This is the main section in which the author can express your interpretations & opinions, for example how important the author thinks the results are, the author’s suggestions for future research and the clinical implications of the findings
  • 25.
     Answer tothe question posed in the intro. With accompanying support, explanation with reference to published literature. Explanations of:  How the findings concur with those of others.  Any discrepancies of the results with those of others.  The limitations of the study which may affect the study validity or findings.  Importance of the work e.g. clinical significance  Recommendations for further research
  • 26.
    Conclusions  This sectionmust comprise a brief statement of the major findings & Implications of the study.  It is not the function of this section to summarise the study; this is the purpose of the abstract.  New information must not be included in the conclusion part. • Should not be a summary of the work done- abstract is doing fine with that.
  • 27.
    Acknowledgements  All importantcontributors should be acknowledged, for eg. persons who provided statistical or technical advice & assistance.  Those who helped with recruitment & with the preparation of the manuscript.  If the research was supported by a grant, then the name of the funding body must be included.  For eg. The authors thanks Dr…….and Dr…. for their help in reviewing this manuscript.
  • 28.
    References  Cite currentand key pertinent references  Reference citations must be accurate and complete  Read the references  Use correct style for journal
  • 29.
    Section Purpose Title Clearlydescribes contents Authors Ensures recognition for the writer(s) Abstract Describes what was done Key Words (some journals) Ensures the article is correctly identified in abstracting and indexing services Introduction Explains the problem Methods Explains how the data were collected Results Describes what was discovered Discussion Discusses the implications of the findings Acknowledgements Ensures those who helped in the research are recognised References Ensures previously published work is recognised Appendices (some journals) Provides supplemental data for the expert reader
  • 30.
    THANK YOU Even verycreative experiments and novel results will have dull impact if the manuscript is not written well.