2. What Makes a Good Proposal?
A good idea or a significant problem, a clear
description on the idea or problem, then
finally a funding agency’s priorities.
3. Factors We Can’t Control
Internal politics within the funding agency
Stiff competition from other applicants
Limited availability of funds for certain
program areas within funding agency
4. Factors We Can Control
Quality of our own proposal
Requires careful research and planning
Requires meticulous execution
5. What is a research proposal?
A research proposal is your plan
It describes in detail your study
Decisions about your study are based on the
quality of the proposal
Research funding
Approvals to proceed by the Institutional Review
Board
6. Any research /study should have a
proper proposal in written form before
it is actually carried out
It is like a blue print of a building plan
before the construction starts
Writing a research proposal is both
science and art
A good research proposal is based on
scientific facts and on the art of clear
communication
7. Writing a formal research proposal should be started by
the time one has decided on the topic for the study
Objective
Justification
Introduction
Background /Review of literature
Methodology
Time frame and work schedule/Gantt chart
Personnel needed / available
Facilities needed / available
Budget
8. Objectives
• This is a very important and pivotal section
and everything else in the study is centered
around it
• The objective of the proposed study should
be stated very clearly
• The objective stated should be specific,
achievable and measurable
• Too many objectives to be avoided
• Even just one clearly stated relevant objective for a
study would be good enough
• If there is more than one objective the objectives
can be presented in the appropriate order of
importance
9. Sections of the Proposal
Summary
Need
Budget
Plan
Evaluate
Method
10. Budget Your Time
80% planning the project 20% writing the proposal
Solid partnershipsSolid partnerships
InnovativeInnovative
projectproject
CommunicateCommunicate
Define yourDefine your
budgetbudget
11. Cover/Title Page
Use sponsor agency form if applicable
Use required guidelines (MLA, APA, EEE,
for title page
Project title
Organization name
Sponsor agency name (if applicable)
Submission date
12. Project Summary / Abstract
One page
State problem
Propose solution
State project objectives and significance
NSF requires statement of intellectual merit and
broader impacts
13. Introduction
The problem proposed to be studied is introduced in
this section
It should help the reader to acquaint with the topic
Introduction should be short about one or two pages
The problem should be stated in such a way that it’s
importance and relevance is realized by any one who
reads it
The research should be clear, concise &
understandable
14. Introduction
What specific need or problem does
your research address?
How was the need identified and its
significance?
Who will benefit from the proposed
research project?
What are the research questions and/or
objectives of the proposal
15. Review of the Literature
Literature review should relate to:
The topic
Methodology
Know the facts & issues
Interest on the topic
Identify the gaps
Justify your study
16. Background
(Review of Literature)
This section reflects extensive review of literature done by the
investigator
In this section what is already known about the topic is written
including the lacunae
Just quoting the literature verbatim will not serve the purpose
It is important to make it coherent, relevant and easily readable
knowledge
It helps the investigator to gain good knowledge in that field of
inquiry
It also helps the investigator to have insight on different
methodologies that could be applied
17. Research methodology
Research methodology is a way to systematically
solve the research problem. It may be understood as
a science of studying how research is done
scientifically
It is necessary for the researcher to know not only
the research methods/techniques but also the
methodology.
Researchers not only need to know how to develop
certain indices or tests and how to calculate the
mean, the mode, the median or the standard
deviation or chi-square etc.,
18. It is essential to discuss procedures clearly
and completely with considerable amount
of details
Study design
Study population / Sampling specifications
Sample size needed
Instrumentation
Specific procedures
19. Study design
Definition: A study design is a specific
plan or protocol for conducting the study,
which allows the investigator to translate
the conceptual hypothesis into an
operational one.
The study design should be clearly stated
The study design to be used should be
appropriate for achieving the objective of
the study
20. Study population / Sample specifications
It is important to describe which would be
the study population
How study subjects would be selected,
randomization process and other details
should be given
22. Description of process
Proposal should include the details of all process
to be adopted in the study
How exposures, outcome variables and other
variables are going to be measured should be described in
detail
A brief description of how the data will be processed
and use of statistical package if any should be given
What statistical tests of significance would be used?
23. Time Frame & Work Schedule
The proposal should include the sequence of tasks to
be performed, the anticipated length of time required
for its completion and the personnel required
It can be presented in tabular or graphic form (Gantt
chart)
Flow charts and other diagrams are often useful for
highlighting the sequencing and interrelationship of
different activities in the study
Illustrate each phase of implementation
Show when results will be achieved
26. Bibliography
Should include full reference
documentation for all books and articles
Use style format commonly adopted by
specific field
27. Project Description and Plan of
Operation
Describe activities to be undertaken
Identify person responsible for each
Describe oversight and management
of project
Describe qualifications of key
personnel
28. Organizational Capability
Describe your organization, its history,
and its mission
Describe organization’s strengths in terms
of staff, facilities, resources
Describe prior experience relevant to the
proposed project
29. Budget and Cost-Effectiveness
Make sure budget coincides with narrative
Make sure sponsor will support budget
categories you propose
Some sponsors may disallow equipment,
overhead or other costs
30. Budget and Cost-Effectiveness
The budget translates project activities into monetary
terms
It is a statement of how much money will be required
to accomplish the various tasks
Major items
Salary for staff
Travel
Purchase of equipment
Printing / Xeroxing
Consultancy charges
Institutional overheads
31. Budget and Cost-Effectiveness
Be realistic about your budget
Inflating budget may hurt your chances of
being funded
Budgeting too low may make the project
impossible to do with funds provided
Estimate costs as accurately as possible
32. Budget and Cost-Effectiveness
Cost-sharing
Sometimes required by sponsor
Can be cash or in-kind
Be careful: don’t cost-share items you can’t
document
Check both sponsor’s and your own
organization’s guidelines regarding cost-sharing
Overhead/Indirect costs
Usually a percentage of total budget (45%)
Check sponsor’s allowed overhead rate, if any
33. Budget and Cost-Effectiveness
Demonstrate that project is cost-effective: it will have a
significant impact for a reasonable cost
Describe organizational resources (staff support,
facilities, equipment) not funded by the sponsor
Provide a budget narrative
Explain how you arrived at figures in each category
How fringe benefits are calculated
How you calculated travel costs
How you estimated equipment costs
34. Advice on approach
Research the funder and the review process
Always write for reviewer
Communicate well w/ support (committee
who will write letters, unit that will submit
grant proposals, agency officials)
Read directions and follow them obsessively
Understand that a proposal is an instrument
of persuasion
35. Common, easy-to-avoid mistakes
Don’t follow directions (font, margins, pages,
appended material, etc.)
Format
Not allowing enough time
Careless criticism of other scholars in field
Don’t include all who, what, where, when,
why, and how info., up front
36. Other common problems w/ predoc
proposals (more difficult to remedy):
Research problem itself
Scholarly background to the problem—uneven
or inadequate or erroneous
Writing unclear—too much jargon, not
accessible, or not well organized
Methods and work plan unclear or undefended
Lack of specificity
Introduction and background re: grants (ESC, RFF)
This presentation will be online on Grants Office page
Speaks generally about proposals; can follow up about specifics later
Have your ducks in a row BEFORE you write a proposal – have your partnerships and budget as close to final as possible…and remember that Innovative projects will catch their attention