- The patient is a 42-year-old Thai female nurse who fell in the bathroom and injured her right wrist. X-rays showed a closed fracture at the distal end of the right radius bone (Colles' fracture).
- Distal radius fractures are common injuries, especially in older patients. They result from falls onto an outstretched hand.
- Treatment depends on the fracture pattern and stability. Most can be treated with closed reduction and casting, while unstable or displaced fractures may require surgery.
Posterior lumbar fusion vs Lumbar interbody fusion Evidence based.pptxsuresh Bishokarma
Lumbar degenerative disc diseases (LDDD): irreversible process in lumbar disk architecture.
Sparse literature to choose proper technique to address these pathology with or without fusion surgery.
A clear benefit of lumbar fusion surgery: lowered pain and disability scores.
Lumbar surgery rates have increased steadily over time, and hence related complications.
Evidence of the superiority of one technique over the other is sparse.
Surgery offers greater improvement compared with non-operative treatment in LDDD.
Surgery in disc herniation resulted in faster recovery, However no added benefit of fusion surgery.
There was no obvious disadvantage of posterolateral fusion without internal fixation in patient with spondylosis.
Among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis, decompression plus fusion surgery may not result in better clinical outcomes.
In patient with spondylolisthesis with or without stenosis, fusion is more effective than laminectomy in achieving a satisfactory outcome. Decompression only had the least satisfactory outcome.
Patients who underwent interbody fusion may have significantly higher fusion rates compared to posterior lumbar fusion only.
TLIF has advantages over PLIF in the complication rate, blood loss, and operation duration. The clinical outcome is similar, with a slightly lower postoperative ODI score for TLIF.
In the end, The choice of technique is still greatly based on the surgeons’ preference and experience.
Surgical Approaches to Acetabulum and PelvisBijay Mehta
Important surgical approaches to acetabulum and pelvis are described.
Ilioinguinal approach, Modified Stoppa Approach, Kocher lagenbeck Approach, Ilifemoral approach and extensile approaches are well illustrated and described.
Posterior lumbar fusion vs Lumbar interbody fusion Evidence based.pptxsuresh Bishokarma
Lumbar degenerative disc diseases (LDDD): irreversible process in lumbar disk architecture.
Sparse literature to choose proper technique to address these pathology with or without fusion surgery.
A clear benefit of lumbar fusion surgery: lowered pain and disability scores.
Lumbar surgery rates have increased steadily over time, and hence related complications.
Evidence of the superiority of one technique over the other is sparse.
Surgery offers greater improvement compared with non-operative treatment in LDDD.
Surgery in disc herniation resulted in faster recovery, However no added benefit of fusion surgery.
There was no obvious disadvantage of posterolateral fusion without internal fixation in patient with spondylosis.
Among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis, decompression plus fusion surgery may not result in better clinical outcomes.
In patient with spondylolisthesis with or without stenosis, fusion is more effective than laminectomy in achieving a satisfactory outcome. Decompression only had the least satisfactory outcome.
Patients who underwent interbody fusion may have significantly higher fusion rates compared to posterior lumbar fusion only.
TLIF has advantages over PLIF in the complication rate, blood loss, and operation duration. The clinical outcome is similar, with a slightly lower postoperative ODI score for TLIF.
In the end, The choice of technique is still greatly based on the surgeons’ preference and experience.
Surgical Approaches to Acetabulum and PelvisBijay Mehta
Important surgical approaches to acetabulum and pelvis are described.
Ilioinguinal approach, Modified Stoppa Approach, Kocher lagenbeck Approach, Ilifemoral approach and extensile approaches are well illustrated and described.
the slide describes femoral fracture with case presentations as well as rediological diagnosis ,when opened and closed .the management from emergency period and through to stabilization
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
6. PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
Primary survey
A: can speak , c-spine not tender
B:equal breath sound borh lungs,CCT negative
C:v/s stable,no active bleed
D: E4V5M6, pupis 3 mm RTLBE
E:tender at right wrisr, limit ROM due to pain
7. Secondary survey
Allergy : no food or drug allergy
Medication : no current medication
Past history : no underlying disease
Last meal : 5 hr prior to hospital
E : as in PI
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
8. PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
Vital signs BP 160/85 Pulse 95 RR 20 T 36.6 c
GA : alert, well cooperative
HEENT: no pale conjunctivae,anicteric sclerae
Heart : normal s1s2, no murmur
Lungs : clear breath sound equal both lungs
Abdomen : soft, not tender
Neuro : E4V5M6, pupils 3 mmRTLBE , motor power grade IV all except right upper extremity limit
ROM due to pain
Extremities : no external wound, deformities at right wrist, tender, limit ROM due to
pain,neurovascular intact
12. EPIDEMIOLOGY
Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures of
the upper extremity.
Fractures of the distal radius represent approximately one-sixth
of all fractures treated in emergency departments and about 16%
of all fractures treated by orthopaedic surgeons.
The incidence of distal radius fractures in the elderly correlates
with osteopenia and rises in incidence with increasing age.
13. ANATOMY
The metaphysis of the distal radius is composed primarily of cancellous bone.The articular
surface has a biconcave surface for articulation with the proximal carpal row (scaphoid and
lunate fossae), as well as a notch for articulation with the distal ulna.
Eighty percent of axial load is supported by the distal radius and 20% by the ulna and the
triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC).
Reversal of the normal palmar tilt results in load transfer onto the ulna and TFCC; the
remaining load is then borne eccentrically by the distal radius and is concentrated on the
dorsal aspect of the scaphoid fossa.
Numerous ligamentous attachments exist to the distal radius; these often remain intact during
distalradius fracture, facilitating reduction through “ligamentotaxis.”
The volar ligaments are stronger and confer more stability to the radiocarpal articulation than
the dorsal ligaments.
14.
15. MECHANISM OF INJURY
Common mechanisms in younger individuals include falls from a height,
motor vehicle accidents,or injuries sustained during athletic participation.
In elderly individuals, distal radial fractures may arise from low-energy
mechanisms, such as a simple fall from a standing height, and as such are
considered a fragility fracture.
The most common mechanism of injury is a fall onto an outstretched
hand with the wrist in dorsiflexion.
Fractures of the distal are produced when the dorsiflexion of the wrist
varies between 40 and 90 degrees.
16. MECHANISM OF INJURY
The radius initially fails in tension on the volar aspect, with the
fracture propagating dorsally, whereas bending moment forces induce
compression stresses, resulting in dorsal comminution. Cancellous
impaction of the metaphysis further compromises dorsal stability.
Additionally,shearing forces influence the injury pattern, often resulting
in articular surface involvement.
High-energy injuries (e.g., vehicular trauma) may result in significantly
displaced or highly comminuted unstable fractures to the distal radius.
17. CLINICAL EVALUATION
wrist deformity and displacement
swollen with ecchymosis
tenderness, and painful range of motion
The ipsilateral elbow and shoulder should be examined for
associated injuries.
A careful neurovascular assessment should be performed, with
particular attention to median nerve function.
18. RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION
Posteroanterior and lateral views of the wrist should be
obtained, with oblique views for further fracture definition, if
necessary.
Computed tomography scan may help to demonstrate the extent
of intra-articular involvement.
22. CLASSIFICATION
Type I: Metaphyseal bending fracture with the inherent problems
of loss of palmar tilt and radial shortening relative to the ulna
(DRUJ injury ex. Colles’, Smith’s fracture
Type II: Shearing fracture requiring reduction and often
buttressing of the articular segment
Type III: Compression of the articular surface without the
characteristic fragmentation; also the potential for significant
interosseous ligament injury
23. CLASSIFICATION
Type IV:Avulsion fracture or radiocarpal fracture-dislocation
TypeV: Combined injury with significant soft tissue involvement
owing to high-energy injury
24. COMMON DISTAL END RADIUS
FRACTURE
Colles fracture
Transverse fracture of radius
1 inch proximal to the radio-carpal
joint
Dorsal displacement and angulation
The mechanism of injury is a fall onto
a hyperextended, radially deviated
wrist with the forearm in pronation.
Clinically, it has been described as a
“dinner fork” deformity.
25. COMMON DISTAL END RADIUS
FRACTURE
Smith fracture (reverse Colles
fracture)
This describes a fracture with
volar angulation (apex dorsal)
of the distal radius with a
“garden spade” deformity or
volar displacement of the hand
and distal radius.
The mechanism of injury is a
fall onto a flexed wrist with the
forearm fixed in supination.
26. COMMON DISTAL END RADIUS
FRACTURE
Barton fracture
This is a shearing mechanism of
injury that results in a fracture-
dislocation or subluxation of the
wrist
Intra-articular fracture
Volar type/Dorsal type
The mechanism of injury is a fall
onto a dorsiflexed wrist with the
forearm fixed in pronation.
27. COMMON DISTAL END RADIUS
FRACTURE
Die-punch fracture
A depression fracture of the
lunate fossa of the distal
radius
High energy compression
force
28. COMMON DISTAL END RADIUS
FRACTURE
Radial styloid fracture
The mechanism of injury is
compression of the scaphoid
against the styloid with the
wrist in dorsiflexion and ulnar
deviation.
It is often associated with
intercarpal ligamentous
injuries (i.e., scapholunate
dissociation,perilunate
dislocation).
29. TREATMENT
Factors affecting treatment include:
Fracture pattern
Local factors: bone quality, soft tissue injury, fracture
comminution, fracture displacement, and energy of injury
Patient factors: physiologic patient age, lifestyle, occupation,
hand dominance, associated medical conditions, associated
injuries, and compliance
30. TREATMENT
Acceptable radiographic parameters for a healed radius in an
active, healthy patient include:
Radial length: within 2 to 3 mm of the contralateral wrist
Palmar tilt: neutral tilt (0 degrees)
Intra-articular step-off: <2 mm
Radial inclination: <5-degree loss
31. TREATMENT
All fractures should undergo closed reduction, even if it is expected that
surgical management will be needed.
Nonoperative management is indicated for:
Nondisplaced or minimally displaced fractures
Displaced fractures with a stable fracture pattern which can be
expected to unite within acceptable radiographic parameters
Low-demand elderly patients in whom future functional impairment is
less of a priority than immediate health concerns and/or operative risks
35. TREATMENT
Indication for surgery
1. Unstable
1) Fernandez type II, IV,V and some case in I, III
2) Lafontaine criteria > 3 of 5 instability parameters
3) Secondary displacement after casting
36. TREATMENT
2. Irreducible fracture
1) Double die punch
2) Displaced comminuted PM fragment
3) Articular step off > 2 mm
4) Severe comminution
5) Shortening > 5mm
37. TREATMENT
3. Unacceptable alignment
1) Radial inclination < 15°
2) Shortening > 5 mm
3) Dorsal tilt > 10°
4)Volar tilt > 20°
5) Articular step off or gap > 2 mm
4. Open fracture
5. Associated injury