standard operating procedure -SOP ( a detail discussion )martinshaji
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) are an integral part of Good Manufacturing Practices. Without SOPs its really tough to run such big infrastructures of Pharma Manufacturing Units. SOPs are also required as regulatory requirements & every worker must be aware of the SOPs related to his/her job function.
please comment
thank uu
Master batch record,batch production record ,Quality Audit Type and plan &Rec...KarishmaFuse
Standard Operating procedure(SOP), Preparation review ,Approval Issuance of master batch Record MBR and Batch Production Record (BPR) and Quality Audit Type, plan and Objectives.
standard operating procedure -SOP ( a detail discussion )martinshaji
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) are an integral part of Good Manufacturing Practices. Without SOPs its really tough to run such big infrastructures of Pharma Manufacturing Units. SOPs are also required as regulatory requirements & every worker must be aware of the SOPs related to his/her job function.
please comment
thank uu
Master batch record,batch production record ,Quality Audit Type and plan &Rec...KarishmaFuse
Standard Operating procedure(SOP), Preparation review ,Approval Issuance of master batch Record MBR and Batch Production Record (BPR) and Quality Audit Type, plan and Objectives.
The all the content in this profile is completed by the teachers, students as well as other health care peoples.
thank you, all the respected peoples, for giving the information to complete this presentation.
this information is free to use by anyone.
Documentation is an integral part of good manufacturing practices. It defines a system of information and control so that risks so inherent in misinterpretation and/or error in oral communication are minimized.
It is process of “Establishing documentary evidence that provide a high degree of assurance that a specific process will consistently produce a product meeting its predetermined specifications and quality attributes”.
In the pharmaceutical industry, it is very important that in addition to final testing and compliance of products, it is also assured that the process will consistently produce the expected results.
Validation is action of proving in accordance with the principles of good manufacturing practices, that any procedure, process, equipment, material, activity or system actually leads to expected results.
Cleaning validation is documented evidence with a high degree assurance that one can consistently clean a system or a piece of equipment to predetermined and acceptable limits.
The primary regulatory concern driving the need for cleaning validation is cross contamination of the desired drug substance either by other API from previous batch runs or by residues from the cleaning agents used.
The prime purpose of validating a cleaning process is to ensure compliance with federal and other standard regulations
1. Cross contamination with active ingredients
Contamination of one batch of product with significant levels of residual active ingredients from previous batch cannot be tolerated.
In addition to the obvious problems posed by subjecting consumers or patients to unintended contaminants, potential clinically significant synergistic interactions between pharmacologically active chemicals are a real concern.
2. Contamination with unintended materials or compounds
While inert ingredients used in drug products are generally recognized as safe for human consumption, the routine use, maintenance and cleaning of equipment's provide the potential contamination with such items as equipment parts, lubricants and chemical cleaning agents3. Microbiological contamination
Maintenance , cleaning and storage conditions may provide adventitious microorganisms with the opportunity to proliferate within the processing equipment.
Qualification of Dissolution Test Apparatus and Validation of Utility System this presentation will help to enhance your knowledge in validation and qualification area.
The all the content in this profile is completed by the teachers, students as well as other health care peoples.
thank you, all the respected peoples, for giving the information to complete this presentation.
this information is free to use by anyone.
Documentation is an integral part of good manufacturing practices. It defines a system of information and control so that risks so inherent in misinterpretation and/or error in oral communication are minimized.
It is process of “Establishing documentary evidence that provide a high degree of assurance that a specific process will consistently produce a product meeting its predetermined specifications and quality attributes”.
In the pharmaceutical industry, it is very important that in addition to final testing and compliance of products, it is also assured that the process will consistently produce the expected results.
Validation is action of proving in accordance with the principles of good manufacturing practices, that any procedure, process, equipment, material, activity or system actually leads to expected results.
Cleaning validation is documented evidence with a high degree assurance that one can consistently clean a system or a piece of equipment to predetermined and acceptable limits.
The primary regulatory concern driving the need for cleaning validation is cross contamination of the desired drug substance either by other API from previous batch runs or by residues from the cleaning agents used.
The prime purpose of validating a cleaning process is to ensure compliance with federal and other standard regulations
1. Cross contamination with active ingredients
Contamination of one batch of product with significant levels of residual active ingredients from previous batch cannot be tolerated.
In addition to the obvious problems posed by subjecting consumers or patients to unintended contaminants, potential clinically significant synergistic interactions between pharmacologically active chemicals are a real concern.
2. Contamination with unintended materials or compounds
While inert ingredients used in drug products are generally recognized as safe for human consumption, the routine use, maintenance and cleaning of equipment's provide the potential contamination with such items as equipment parts, lubricants and chemical cleaning agents3. Microbiological contamination
Maintenance , cleaning and storage conditions may provide adventitious microorganisms with the opportunity to proliferate within the processing equipment.
Qualification of Dissolution Test Apparatus and Validation of Utility System this presentation will help to enhance your knowledge in validation and qualification area.
Guidance for Preparing Standard Operating Procedures (Sops)iosrphr_editor
The IOSR Journal of Pharmacy (IOSRPHR) is an open access online & offline peer reviewed international journal, which publishes innovative research papers, reviews, mini-reviews, short communications and notes dealing with Pharmaceutical Sciences( Pharmaceutical Technology, Pharmaceutics, Biopharmaceutics, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmaceutical/Medicinal Chemistry, Computational Chemistry and Molecular Drug Design, Pharmacognosy & Phytochemistry, Pharmacology, Pharmaceutical Analysis, Pharmacy Practice, Clinical and Hospital Pharmacy, Cell Biology, Genomics and Proteomics, Pharmacogenomics, Bioinformatics and Biotechnology of Pharmaceutical Interest........more details on Aim & Scope).
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR PUBLISHING COURTESY
ADVERTISEMENT, SPONSORSHIP& OTHER PUBLICITY INITIATIVES BY SECL MBA/BBA presentation Pune University/Mumbai University/kolkata university / Best PPT
standard operating procedure are the important document for pharmaceutical company & organization which may follow reference copy of the manufacturing batch or lot.
a detailed project on standard oprating procedure (SOP) in the elective subject of GMP
A standard operating procedure (SOP) is a set of step-by-step instructions compiled by an organization to help workers carry out complex routine operations. SOPs aim to achieve efficiency, quality output and uniformity of performance, while reducing miscommunication and failure to comply with industry regulations.
Thought At Work partners with you to examine your processes and help you with transform the processes to achieve desired "Shared Value" not only from the Customer but also from a Business point of view.
PMI Proper Material Identification of Alloy Material. X-Ray Production or fabrication processes can include dozens of stages to convert raw materials into finished goods. Regardless of the raw material or the finished product, one factor is constant - - most metals look alike.
Documentation relating to product development,sop's,cleaning methods,quality ...swrk
COMPLAINT HANDLING IN PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES,PRODUCT RECALL,RETENTION RECORDS, DISTRIBUTION RECORDS.prepared by s.susena,m.pharmacy pharmaceutical analysis&QA,ssj college of pharmacy
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
Standard operating procedure
1. • PRESENTD BY :-
• PATIL PRANJAY SADASHIV.
• FIRST YEAR M.PHARM.
• DEPARTMENT OF QUALITY ASSURANCE.
H. R. Patel Institute of Pharmaceutical Education
and Research, Shirpur
Standard Operating Procedure
3. A Standard Operating Procedure
(SOP) is a set of written
instructions that document a
routine or repetitive activity
followed by an organization.
DEFINITION
3
4. INTRODUCTION
4
The development and use of SOPs
are an integral part of a successful
quality system as it provides
individuals with the information to
perform a job properly, and facilitates
consistency in the quality and
integrity of a product or end-result.
5. The term “SOP” may not always be
appropriate and terms such as protocols,
instructions, worksheets, and laboratory
operating procedures may also be used.
For this document “SOP” will be used.
SOPs describe both technical and
fundamental programmatic operational
elements of an organization
6. CONTENTS OF SOP
Since each institute operates and
functions differently depending on
varying circumstances, and has its
own ways of carrying out certain
procedures, the SOPs in different
factories will differ. However, the
basic content, structure, and the
concepts of SOPs will obviously be
the same.
7. Some of the important contents of
SOPs are :
Name & Address of the company
SOP number, and Date when the SOP was
prepared/reviewed.
Aim or Objective of the SOP
Scope of the SOP
(area which will be covered by the SOP)
Process/Steps to be carried out, in sequential
order.
Whose responsibility it is to carry out the SOP.
Any other useful information
Name and signature of the person/s who
made/reviewed the SOPs, along with date of
review.
8. PURPOSE
SOPs detail the regularly recurring work
processes that are to be conducted or followed
within an organization.
They document the way activities are to be
performed to facilitate consistent conformance to
technical and quality system requirements and to
support data quality.
SOPs are intended to be specific to the
organization or facility whose activities are
described and assist that organization to maintain
their quality control and quality assurance
processes and ensure compliance with
governmental regulations. 8
9. If not written correctly, SOPs are of limited
value.
In addition, the best written SOPs will fail if they
are not followed.
Therefore, the use of SOPs needs to be
reviewed and re-enforced by management,
preferably the direct supervisor.
Current copies of the SOPs also need to be
readily accessible for reference in the work
areas of those individuals actually performing
the activity, either in hard copy or electronic
format,
10. BENEFITS
The development and use of SOPs minimizes
variation and promotes quality through
consistent implementation of a process or
procedure within the organization, even if
there are temporary or permanent personnel
changes.
When historical data are being evaluated for
current use, SOPs can also be valuable for
reconstructing project activities when no
other references are available.
11. Ultimately, the benefits of a valid SOP are
reduced work effort, along with improved
comparability, credibility, and legal
defensibility.
SOPs are needed even when published
methods are being utilized. For example, if an
SOP is written for a standard analytical
method, the SOP should specify the
procedures to be followed in greater detail
than appear in the published method.
12. WRITING STYLE
SOPs should be written in a concise, step-by-
step, easy-to-read format.
The information presented should be
unambiguous and not overly complicated.
The active voice and present verb tense
should be used. The term "you" should not
be used, but implied.
The document should not be wordy,
redundant, or overly lengthy.
In addition, follow the style guide used by
your organization, e.g., font size and margins.
13. SOP PREPARATION
13
The organization should have a procedure in
place for determining what procedures or
processes need to be documented.
Those SOPs should then be written by
individuals knowledgeable with the activity
and the organization's internal structure.
A team approach can be followed, especially
for multi-tasked processes where the
experiences of a number of individuals are
critical.
14. SOPs should be written with sufficient detail so that
someone with limited experience with or knowledge
of the procedure, but with a basic understanding, can
successfully reproduce the procedure when
unsupervised.
The experience requirement for performing an
activity should be noted in the section on personnel
qualifications.
For example, if a basic chemistry or biological
course experience or additional training is required
that requirement should be indicated.
15. SOP REVIEW AND APPROVAL
SOPs should be reviewed (that is, validated)
by one or more individuals with appropriate
training and experience with the process.
It is especially helpful if draft SOPs are
actually tested by individuals other than the
original writer before the SOPs are finalized.
The finalized SOPs should be approved as
described in the organization’s Quality
Management Plan or its own SOP for
preparation of SOPs.
16. REVISIONS
AND
REVIEWS
SOPs should be also systematically reviewed on a
periodic basis, e.g. every 1-2 years, to ensure that the
policies and procedures remain current and
appropriate, or to determine whether the SOPs are
even needed.
If an SOP describes a process that is no longer
followed, it should be withdrawn from the current file.
The review process should not be overly
cumbersome to encourage timely review.
That plan should also indicate the individual(s)
responsible for ensuring that SOPs are current.
16
17. CHECKLISTS
Any checklists or forms included as part of
an activity should be referenced at the points
in the procedure where they are to be used
and then attached to the SOP.
In those cases, the SOP should describe, at
least generally, how the checklist is to be
prepared, or on what it is to be based.
Copies of specific checklists should be then
maintained in the file with the activity results 17
and/or with the SOP.
18. SOP DOCUMENT TRACKING AND
ARCHIVAL
The organization should maintain a master list
of all SOPs.
This file or database should indicate the SOP
number, version number, date of issuance, title,
author, status, organizational division, branch,
section, and any historical information
regarding past versions.
The QA Manager (or designee) is generally the
individual responsible for maintaining a file
listing all current quality-related SOPs used
within the organization. 18
19. If an electronic database is used, automatic
“Review SOP” notices can be sent .This list
may be used also when audits are being
considered.
The Quality Management Plan should indicate
the individual(s) responsible for assuring that
only the current version is used.
That plan should also designated where, and
how, outdated versions are to be maintained or
archived in a manner to prevent their continued
use, as well as to be available for historical
data review.
Electronic storage and retrieval mechanisms
are usually easier to access than a hard-copy
document format.
20. SOP GENERAL FORMAT
SOPs should be organized to ensure
ease and efficiency in use and to be
specific to the organization which
develops it.
There is no one “correct” format; and
internal formatting will vary with each
organization and with the type of SOP
being written.
21. 1.TITLE PAGE
The first page or cover page of each SOP should
contain the following information: a title that
clearly identifies the activity or procedure, an SOP
identification (ID) number,
Date of issue and/or revision, the name of the
applicable agency, division, and/or branch to
which this SOP applies, and the signatures and
signature dates of those individuals who prepared
and approved the SOP.
Electronic signatures are acceptable for SOPs
maintained on a computerized database
22. 2.TABLE OF CONTENTS
A Table of Contents may be needed for
quick reference, especially if the SOP is
long, for locating information and to
denote changes or revisions made only
to certain sections of an SOP.
23. 3.TEXT
Well-written SOPs should first briefly describe the
purpose of the work or process, including any
regulatory information or standards that are
appropriate to the SOP process, and the scope to
indicate what is covered.
Define any specialized or unusual terms either in a
separate definition section or in the appropriate
discussion section.
Denote what sequential procedures should be
followed, divided into significant sections;
E.g., possible interferences, equipment needed,
personnel qualifications, and safety considerations
(preferably listed in bold to capture the attention of the
user). 23
24. SOPs should be clearly worded so as to
be readily understandable by a person
knowledgeable with the general concept
of the procedure, and the procedures
should be written in a format that clearly
describes the steps in order.
Use of diagrams and flow charts help to
break up long sections of text and to
briefly summarize a series of steps for
the reader.
25. Attach any appropriate information, e.g.,
an SOP may reference other SOPs. In
such a case, the following should be
included
Cite the other SOP and attach a copy, or
reference where it may be easily located.
If the referenced SOP is not to be
followed exactly, the required
modification should be specified in the
SOP at the section where the other SOP
is cited.
27. 1. SOPs may be written for any repetitive
technical activity,
2. As well as for any administrative or
functional programmatic procedure, that
is being followed within an organization.
3. General guidance for preparing both
technical and administrative SOPs
follows and examples of each are
located in the Appendix
28. GUIDELINES FOR TECHNICAL SOP TEXT
Technical SOPs can be written for a wide variety
of activities.
Examples are SOPs instructing the user how to
perform a specific analytical method to be
followed in the laboratory or field (such as field
testing using an immunoassay kit), or how to
collect a sample in order to preserve the sample
integrity and
Representativeness (such as collection of
samples for future analysis of volatile organic
compounds or trace metals), or how to conduct
a bioassessment of a freshwater site.
29. Technical SOPs are also needed to cover activities
such as data processing and evaluation (including
verification and validation), modeling, risk
assessment, and auditing of equipment operation.
Citing published methods in SOPs is not always
acceptable, because cited published methods may
not contain pertinent information for conducting the
procedure-in-house.
Technical SOPs need to include the specific steps
aimed at initiating, coordinating, and recording
and/or reporting the results of the activity, and
should be tailored only to that activity.
Technical SOPs should fit within the framework
presented here, but this format can be modified,
reduced, or expanded as required.
30. GUIDELINES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OR
FUNDAMENTAL PROGRAMMATIC SOP
As with the technical SOPs, these SOPs can be written for a wide va
of activities,
E.g., reviewing documentation such as contracts, QA Project Plans a
Quality Management Plans; inspecting (auditing) the work of others;
determining organizational training needs;
Developing information on records maintenance; validating data
packages; or describing office correspondence procedures.
Administrative SOPs need to include a number of specific steps
aimed at initiating the activity, coordinating the activity, and
recording and/or reporting the results of the activity, tailored to that
activity. 30
31. For example, audit or assessment SOPs should specify
the authority for the assessment, how auditees are to
be selected, what will be done with the results, and who
is responsible for corrective action.
Administrative SOPs should fit within the framework
presented here, but this format can be modified,
reduced, or expanded.
In general, administrative/programmatic SOPs will
consist of five elements: Title page, Table of Contents,
Purpose, Procedures, Quality Assurance/Quality
Control, and References.
31
33. Analytical SOPs are SOPs that describe
exactly how the lab performs the method.
There are generally three ways for the lab to
create their own analytical SOPs.
Option 1: The analytical SOP may consist entirely of the
referenced published analytical method
Keep in mind that this option will only work if the lab
follows the method exactly (very unlikely).
Option 2: The lab may reference a published method
and include an addendum that details exactly where
the lab deviates from the published method.
Note that when this option is used, the addendum must
include a date of issue or a date of revision. Generally
speaking, this option is considered the most practical
approach for small wastewater laboratories.
Option 3: The lab may choose to create their own SOP
from “scratch”. 33
34. If this option is chosen the code
specifically requires that the SOP
includes each of the following
elements:
1. Identification of the test method
2. Applicable analytes
3. Applicable matrices
4. Method sensitivity
5. Potential interferences
6. Equipment and analytical instruments
34
35. 7. Consumable supplies, reagents and
standards.
8.Sample preservation, storage and hold
time.
9.Quality control samples and frequency of
their analysis.
10. Calibration and standardization.
11. Procedure for analysis
12.Data assessment and acceptance
criteria for quality control measures
13. Corrective actions and contingencies
for handling out of control or
unacceptable data
35
36. Analytical SOPs created from “scratch” must
include a date of issue or a date of revision.
These SOPs can be done in any format/style
the lab chooses as long as all of the required
elements are included and understandable.
Analytical SOPs can be kept in an “analytical
methods manual”, can be included as part of
the quality manual or can be kept as individual
SOPs.
As with all other procedures in the laboratory,
SOPs should be reviewed periodically to
ensure that they remain current.
37. REFERENCES
Garner, Willa Y. and Maureen S. Barge, editors, "Good Laboratory
Practices. An Agrochemical Perspective," ACS Symposium Series
369, American Chemical Society
Guidance for the Preparation of Standard Operating Procedures.
U.S. EPA. Current Version.