Do you remember this patient? A 34 yom who was admitted with a syncopal attack.
 
Brugada syndrome Persistent STE in V1-V3  RBBB pattern THERE IS NO MI
A 81 yof CC : RLQ abdominal pain for  2-3 days. She also have    nausea, vomiting No chest pain or S.O.B. Have MI 5 years ago
 
What is your Dx ? Does she have AMI?
Answer :  NSTEMI! This is confirm by  troponin elevation
“ It is important to recognize that BBB is present, because  LBBB   prevents any further interpretation  of cardiogram, and RBBB can make interpretation difficult.” The ECG Made Easy  by John R. Hampton
“ IMPORTANT: With LBBB,  infarct   cannot be accurately  diagnosed on EKG.” Rapid Interpretation of EKG’s by Dale Dubin M.D.
So what is the problem now? BBB have signs that  cover up/mask the signs of infarction
Let’s revise back the characteristics of  BBB or  intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD).
RABBIT hiding under RICE CAKE showing its RABBIT EARS
RBBB hiding under Right Leads showing its ‘ M’ pattern M Right Leads RBBB
RBBB LBBB “ M” “ W” “ W” “ M” Right lead Left lead Right lead Left lead III, aVF V1, V2 I, aVL V5, V6 III, aVF, V1, V2 I, aVL, V5, V6 Splitting  of S2 Reversed Splitting  of S2
Anymore signs  for BBB?
How to name the waves in QRS complex? What is Q-wave? What is R-wave? What is S-wave? What is terminal deflection?
Q-R- S
R- S
Q- R
R-S- R ’ or “ M”
Q or QS
Let’s improve our vocabulary! Concordance Agreement, concord. Discordance Disagreement, discord.
 
 
T–inversion  (Discordance with terminal deflection) ST –displacement from  isoelectric line (Discordance with terminal deflection) P/S: But this is  NO   ST-displacement in RBBB
 
 
Normal BBB should obey this “normal condition”
So when BBB don’t obey this “normal condition” there is MI !
SGARBOSSA’s CRITERIA by Elena B. Sgarbossa
Modified* Sgarbossa’s Criteria Concordant STE  >  1 mm 2. Concordant STD  >  1 mm  in V1, V2, or V3 3. Discordant STE  >  5mm *Discordant STE  >  ¼ QRS
 
 
Now let’s put what  we learn into practice!
1
2
3
Now let’s make it harder. Try to determine the presence of MI and also it’s location.
4
5
The patient is an elderly female with a known history of LBBB who presented to the emergency ward with S.O.B.
6
She did in fact rule in for a myocardial infarction with a  CK  of 700 and 21%  MB  fraction.
To use the rules of  concordance  in determination of the presence of MI seems easy, but not as easy as we think.
Final Case Middle-aged man admitted with recent chest pain. ECG with the attachment.
7 Hint: There are 7 abnormalities
1. Borderline STC 2. LBBB  3. 2° AV block (5:4  & 4:3 patterns)  4. Single PVC 5. Acute/evolving infero-lateral MI 6. Borderline low QRS voltage  7. Left atrial abnormality.
Cardiac cath. in this patient revealed severe 3 vessel coronary disease with evidence of thrombus in the right posterolateral branch. Left ventriculography showed a reduced left ventricle ejection fraction of 32% with inf./post. & apical/lat. wall motion abnormalities.
Additional comments:   Mobitz type I (AV Wenckebach) block is not uncommon with acute inferior MI. Usually this condition disturbance is transient with inferior MI and does not require temporary or permanent pacing.
A Word of Caution NB!  This criteria is useful, but final diagnosis of MI should always be confirmed by CE elevation and angiography (if possible).
Thank you for  your attention!
 
Elevated troponin levels have been documented in other disease states and situations that are not associated with atherosclerotic epicardial coronary artery disease, including the following: * Pacing, automated implantable cardioverter-defibrillator * Tachyarrhythmias * Hypertension * Myocarditis * Myocardial contusion * Acute and chronic congestive heart failure * Cardiac surgery * Renal failure * Pulmonary embolism * Subarachnoid hemorrhage * Sepsis * Hypothyroidism * Shock

Spot diagnosis by ^^

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Do you rememberthis patient? A 34 yom who was admitted with a syncopal attack.
  • 3.
  • 4.
    Brugada syndrome PersistentSTE in V1-V3 RBBB pattern THERE IS NO MI
  • 5.
    A 81 yofCC : RLQ abdominal pain for 2-3 days. She also have nausea, vomiting No chest pain or S.O.B. Have MI 5 years ago
  • 6.
  • 7.
    What is yourDx ? Does she have AMI?
  • 8.
    Answer : NSTEMI! This is confirm by troponin elevation
  • 9.
    “ It isimportant to recognize that BBB is present, because LBBB prevents any further interpretation of cardiogram, and RBBB can make interpretation difficult.” The ECG Made Easy by John R. Hampton
  • 10.
    “ IMPORTANT: WithLBBB, infarct cannot be accurately diagnosed on EKG.” Rapid Interpretation of EKG’s by Dale Dubin M.D.
  • 11.
    So what isthe problem now? BBB have signs that cover up/mask the signs of infarction
  • 12.
    Let’s revise backthe characteristics of BBB or intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD).
  • 13.
    RABBIT hiding underRICE CAKE showing its RABBIT EARS
  • 14.
    RBBB hiding underRight Leads showing its ‘ M’ pattern M Right Leads RBBB
  • 15.
    RBBB LBBB “M” “ W” “ W” “ M” Right lead Left lead Right lead Left lead III, aVF V1, V2 I, aVL V5, V6 III, aVF, V1, V2 I, aVL, V5, V6 Splitting of S2 Reversed Splitting of S2
  • 16.
  • 17.
    How to namethe waves in QRS complex? What is Q-wave? What is R-wave? What is S-wave? What is terminal deflection?
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
    R-S- R ’or “ M”
  • 22.
  • 23.
    Let’s improve ourvocabulary! Concordance Agreement, concord. Discordance Disagreement, discord.
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 26.
    T–inversion (Discordancewith terminal deflection) ST –displacement from isoelectric line (Discordance with terminal deflection) P/S: But this is NO ST-displacement in RBBB
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
    Normal BBB shouldobey this “normal condition”
  • 30.
    So when BBBdon’t obey this “normal condition” there is MI !
  • 31.
    SGARBOSSA’s CRITERIA byElena B. Sgarbossa
  • 32.
    Modified* Sgarbossa’s CriteriaConcordant STE > 1 mm 2. Concordant STD > 1 mm in V1, V2, or V3 3. Discordant STE > 5mm *Discordant STE > ¼ QRS
  • 33.
  • 34.
  • 35.
    Now let’s putwhat we learn into practice!
  • 36.
  • 37.
  • 38.
  • 39.
    Now let’s makeit harder. Try to determine the presence of MI and also it’s location.
  • 40.
  • 41.
  • 42.
    The patient isan elderly female with a known history of LBBB who presented to the emergency ward with S.O.B.
  • 43.
  • 44.
    She did infact rule in for a myocardial infarction with a CK of 700 and 21% MB fraction.
  • 45.
    To use therules of concordance in determination of the presence of MI seems easy, but not as easy as we think.
  • 46.
    Final Case Middle-agedman admitted with recent chest pain. ECG with the attachment.
  • 47.
    7 Hint: Thereare 7 abnormalities
  • 48.
    1. Borderline STC2. LBBB 3. 2° AV block (5:4 & 4:3 patterns) 4. Single PVC 5. Acute/evolving infero-lateral MI 6. Borderline low QRS voltage 7. Left atrial abnormality.
  • 49.
    Cardiac cath. inthis patient revealed severe 3 vessel coronary disease with evidence of thrombus in the right posterolateral branch. Left ventriculography showed a reduced left ventricle ejection fraction of 32% with inf./post. & apical/lat. wall motion abnormalities.
  • 50.
    Additional comments: Mobitz type I (AV Wenckebach) block is not uncommon with acute inferior MI. Usually this condition disturbance is transient with inferior MI and does not require temporary or permanent pacing.
  • 51.
    A Word ofCaution NB! This criteria is useful, but final diagnosis of MI should always be confirmed by CE elevation and angiography (if possible).
  • 52.
    Thank you for your attention!
  • 53.
  • 54.
    Elevated troponin levelshave been documented in other disease states and situations that are not associated with atherosclerotic epicardial coronary artery disease, including the following: * Pacing, automated implantable cardioverter-defibrillator * Tachyarrhythmias * Hypertension * Myocarditis * Myocardial contusion * Acute and chronic congestive heart failure * Cardiac surgery * Renal failure * Pulmonary embolism * Subarachnoid hemorrhage * Sepsis * Hypothyroidism * Shock

Editor's Notes

  • #4 STE in V1-V5 But M pattern in V1 (right side)  RBBB Is there MI?
  • #7 LAD, Patho-Q in III, aVF  Old Inf. MI T-inversion in I, II, aVL, V1-V6 But M-pattern in II, V6  LBBB
  • #19 qrS DOWN
  • #20 rS DOWN
  • #21 qR UP
  • #22 Q or QS DOWN
  • #23 Q or QS DOWN
  • #36 LBBB Normal
  • #37 STE in V1-V5 But M pattern in V1 (right side)  RBBB Is there MI?
  • #38 LAD, Patho-Q in III, aVF  Old Inf. MI T-inversion in I, II, aVL, V1-V6 But M-pattern in II, V6  LBBB Concordance in V1-V5 (Pan-ant. MI)
  • #39 RBBB Normal
  • #41 LBBB + Ant-Lat-Inf MI
  • #42 LBBB Normal
  • #44 LBBB + Inf-Lat. MI
  • #45 LBBB Normal
  • #46 LBBB Normal
  • #47 LBBB Normal
  • #48 1. Borderline STC 2. LBBB 3. 2° AV block (5:4 & 4:3 patterns) 4. Single PVC 5. Acute/evolving infero-lateral MI 6. Borderline low QRS voltage 7. Left atrial abnormality.
  • #49 LBBB Normal
  • #50 LBBB Normal
  • #51 LBBB Normal