This document discusses methods for comparing the performance of different spatial interpolation techniques for mapping point data. It introduces five main criteria for comparison: overall mapping accuracy, bias, model robustness, model reliability, and computational burden. The document also proposes two new measures for comparing techniques: mapping efficiency, defined as the cost needed to explain 1% of variation, and information production efficiency, defined as the cost needed to produce 1 byte of compressed map data. Comparing techniques based on these criteria can help users select the optimal method for their data and objectives.