Matthew Holley received marks of 18/20 for planning, 50/60 for construction, and 17/20 for evaluation. His total mark was 85/100, earning him a grade of A. The feedback commented that his prezi and PowToon answers showed good understanding of conventions and how they affect the audience. While he provided statistical data for one question, more evidence of research was needed. Some questions provided great analytical detail and understanding, while others lacked thorough research. Overall his work demonstrated a very good grasp of the task, audience, and genre.

1. AS Coursework Overall Marks
Name: HOLLEY Matthew
Planning – Comments and mark out of 18/20
For full comments please see the pre-production marks sheet
Construction – Main Task – comments and mark out of 50/60
For full comments please see the production marks sheet
Evaluation – Comments and mark out of 17/20
Question 1:
Prezi – good clear detail on how conventions used in production with good
understanding shown of how mise-en-scene used. Good evidence of real products
used to highlight argument.
Question 2:
PowToon –good understanding of how characters represented and affect on
audience through use of mise-en-scene. Use of theorists would have enhanced
answer.
Question 3:
Audio – very good detail on distributor on why they were chosen. There is statistical
data but lacks good evidence of research or where information was found other then
eOne website. Lacks images.
Question 4 and 5:
Video and reflective comments – good use of interview and reflection on feedback.
Good detail on potential audience and how they were attracted. Clear understanding
of task.
Question 6:
PowerPoint/SlideShare – Fantastic detail on technologies used in all parts of
production. Post does show great understanding of what was learnt.
Question 7:
Emaze – great detail on progress from prelim task with good addition of screen
grabs from both products and clear understanding of progress.
Some great detail on questions showing very good understanding of task, audience
and genre.
Good analytical detail, good use of images but at times lacks good use of research in
answering questions.
Read your work, as there are lapses in spelling, punctuation and capital letters!
Total 85/100 Grade: A