This document provides an assessment of a student's coursework for an AS level class. It includes the student's name and marks received for planning (16/20), construction of their main task (54/60), and evaluation (17/20). In the evaluation section, the assessor provides comments on the student's answers to various questions, praising their detail, understanding of conventions, and use of research. However, the assessor notes some issues with spelling, punctuation and capitalization. The student's total marks were 87 out of 100, earning them an A grade.

1. AS Coursework Overall Marks
Name: REVELL-TURVEYGeorgia
Planning – Comments and mark out of 16/20
For full comments please see the pre-production marks sheet
Construction – Main Task – comments and mark out of 54/60
For full comments please see the production marks sheet
Evaluation – Comments and mark out of 17/20
Question 1:
Word/SlideShare – excellent detail on how conventions used in production with very
good understanding shown of how mise-en-scene used to set up narrative and
conform to genre codes. There is good evidence of linking product to real products to
highlight argument. The correct term is ’mental health problems’ and not ‘mental
illness’!
Question 2:
PowToon – good detail on how representation and mise-en-scene used to represent
characters.
Use of theorists would have enhanced answer.
The correct term is ’mental health problems’ and not ‘mental illness’!
Question 3:
SoundCloud –good detail on distributor and why they were chosen. Good knowledge
of distributor shown.
Question 4 & 5:
Prezi – good detail on typical audience for genre with use of research, but source of
research not shown. Excellent detail on how audience was attracted with some
feedback included, but needed more examples to show goals had been met.
Question 6:
PowerPoint/SlideShare –good detail on technologies used in parts of production.
Post shows understanding of how effective each tool was in production, with some
detail on what was learnt.
Question 7:
Video Blog – very good post with good detail on what was learnt and progress. Video
would have benefited from clips of your products. Commentary is good with lots of
great detail.
Great detail on questions showing good understanding of task, audience and genre.
Great use of analytical detail, images and research in answering questions.
Read your work, as there are lapses in spelling, punctuation and capital letters!
Good use of technologies.
Total 87/100 Grade: A