ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY
         (EOQ)
           PRESENTED BY
            SAYANA.K.A
            IIIrd SEM MSc IF
     SCHOOL OF INDUSTRIAL FISHERIES
                  CUSAT
INTRODUCTION

ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY IS THE NUMBER
  OF UNITS THAT A COMPANY SHOULD ADD TO
  INVENTORY WITH EACH ORDER TO MINIMISE
  THE TOTAL COSTS OF INVENTORY.
EXAMPLE FOR INVENTORY COSTS ARE
 HOLDING COSTS
ORDER COSTS
SHORTAGE COSTS
DEFENITION AND
        EXPLANATION
SIZE OF THE ORDER WHICH GIVES MAXIMUM
 ECONOMY IN PURCHASING ANY MATERIAL
 AND ULTIMATELY CONTRIBUTES TOWARDS
 MAINTAINING THE MATERIALS AT THE
 OPTIMUM LEVEL AND AT THE MINIMUM
 COST.
THE AMOUNT OF INVENTORY TO BE
 ORDERED AT ONE TIME FOR PURPOSES OF
 MINIMIZING ANNUAL INVENTORY COST.
THE QUANTITY TO
ORDER AT A GIVEN TIME
 MUST BE DETERMINED
  BY BALANCING TWO
       FACTORS
(1) THE COST OF POSSESSING OR
CARRYING MATERIALS AND
           (2) THE COST OF
ACQUIRING OR ORDERING MATERIALS
USE OF EOQ

 AS A PART OF A CONTINUOUS REVIEW OF
 INVENTORY SYSTEM
 MODEL FOR CALCULATING THE APPROPRIATE
 REORDER POINT AND THE OPTIMAL REORDER
 QUANTITY
 TOOL FOR DETERMINING QUANTITY OF
 INVENTORY
FORMULA OF EOQ

EOQ=



•A      =  DEMAND FOR THE YEAR
•CP   =  COST TO PLACE A SINGLE ORDER
•CH   =  COST TO HOLD ONE UNIT INVENTORY FOR 
A  YEAR                                        
UNDER LYING ASSUMPTIONS
• THE ORDERING COST IS CONSTANT.
• THE RATE OF DEMAND IS CONSTANT
• THE PURCHASE PRICE OF THE ITEM IS
  CONSTANT I.E. NO DISCOUNT IS AVAILABLE
• THE REPLENISHMENT IS MADE
  INSTANTANEOUSLY, THE WHOLE BATCH IS
  DELIVERED AT ONCE.
GRAPHICAL SOLUTION
THE TOTAL COST
         FUNCTION
TOTAL COST = PURCHASE COST + ORDERING
 COST + HOLDING COST
PURCHASE COST : VARIABLE COST OF GOODS=
 PURCHASE UNIT PRICE × ANNUAL DEMAND
 QUANTITY. THIS IS P×D
ORDERING COST: COST OF PLACING ORDERS:
 EACH ORDER HAS A FIXED COST S, AND WE NEED
 TO ORDER D/Q TIMES PER YEAR. =S × D/Q
HOLDING COST: THE AVERAGE QUANTITY IN
 STOCK (BETWEEN FULLY REPLENISHED AND
 EMPTY) IS Q/2; =H × Q/2.
EOQ MODEL
THE DIAGRAM BELOW ILLUSTRATES HOW THESE TWO COMPONENTS
 (ANNUAL HOLDING COST AND ANNUAL ORDER COST) CHANGE AS Q,
THE QUANTITY ORDERED, CHANGES. AS Q INCREASES HOLDING COST
INCREASES BUT ORDER COST DECREASES. HENCE THE TOTAL ANNUAL
  COST CURVE IS AS SHOWN BELOW - SOMEWHERE ON THAT CURVE
  LIES A VALUE OF Q THAT CORRESPONDS TO THE MINIMUM TOTAL
                             COST.
HOW TO CALCULATE
         EOQ
1. UNDERSTAND AND REVIEW THE FORMULA
   [2 * (ANNUAL USAGE IN UNITS * ORDER
   COST) / ANNUAL CARRYING COST PER
   UNIT]^(1/2).
2. DEFINE THE VARIABLES.
3. CALCULATE THE NUMERATOR
4. DIVIDE THE NUMERATOR BY ANNUAL
   CARRYING COST PER UNIT
5. TAKE THE SQUARE ROOT
APPLICATION
TO PART OF THE PURCHASES OF ALMOST
 EVERY ORGANISATION
ELIMINATE BURDEN OF CALCULATION AND
 ALSO ENABLES THE USE MORE COMPLEX
 FORMULAS
USEFUL FOR MATERIALS THAT HAVE
 I. REASONABLY STEADY AND PREDICTABLE USAGE
 II. RELATIVELY LOW COST
 III. SHORT LEAD TIME
3...economic order quantity

3...economic order quantity

  • 1.
    ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY (EOQ) PRESENTED BY SAYANA.K.A IIIrd SEM MSc IF SCHOOL OF INDUSTRIAL FISHERIES CUSAT
  • 2.
    INTRODUCTION ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITYIS THE NUMBER OF UNITS THAT A COMPANY SHOULD ADD TO INVENTORY WITH EACH ORDER TO MINIMISE THE TOTAL COSTS OF INVENTORY. EXAMPLE FOR INVENTORY COSTS ARE  HOLDING COSTS ORDER COSTS SHORTAGE COSTS
  • 3.
    DEFENITION AND EXPLANATION SIZE OF THE ORDER WHICH GIVES MAXIMUM ECONOMY IN PURCHASING ANY MATERIAL AND ULTIMATELY CONTRIBUTES TOWARDS MAINTAINING THE MATERIALS AT THE OPTIMUM LEVEL AND AT THE MINIMUM COST. THE AMOUNT OF INVENTORY TO BE ORDERED AT ONE TIME FOR PURPOSES OF MINIMIZING ANNUAL INVENTORY COST.
  • 4.
    THE QUANTITY TO ORDERAT A GIVEN TIME MUST BE DETERMINED BY BALANCING TWO FACTORS (1) THE COST OF POSSESSING OR CARRYING MATERIALS AND (2) THE COST OF ACQUIRING OR ORDERING MATERIALS
  • 5.
    USE OF EOQ AS A PART OF A CONTINUOUS REVIEW OF INVENTORY SYSTEM  MODEL FOR CALCULATING THE APPROPRIATE REORDER POINT AND THE OPTIMAL REORDER QUANTITY  TOOL FOR DETERMINING QUANTITY OF INVENTORY
  • 6.
  • 7.
    UNDER LYING ASSUMPTIONS •THE ORDERING COST IS CONSTANT. • THE RATE OF DEMAND IS CONSTANT • THE PURCHASE PRICE OF THE ITEM IS CONSTANT I.E. NO DISCOUNT IS AVAILABLE • THE REPLENISHMENT IS MADE INSTANTANEOUSLY, THE WHOLE BATCH IS DELIVERED AT ONCE.
  • 8.
  • 9.
    THE TOTAL COST FUNCTION TOTAL COST = PURCHASE COST + ORDERING COST + HOLDING COST PURCHASE COST : VARIABLE COST OF GOODS= PURCHASE UNIT PRICE × ANNUAL DEMAND QUANTITY. THIS IS P×D ORDERING COST: COST OF PLACING ORDERS: EACH ORDER HAS A FIXED COST S, AND WE NEED TO ORDER D/Q TIMES PER YEAR. =S × D/Q HOLDING COST: THE AVERAGE QUANTITY IN STOCK (BETWEEN FULLY REPLENISHED AND EMPTY) IS Q/2; =H × Q/2.
  • 10.
  • 11.
    THE DIAGRAM BELOWILLUSTRATES HOW THESE TWO COMPONENTS (ANNUAL HOLDING COST AND ANNUAL ORDER COST) CHANGE AS Q, THE QUANTITY ORDERED, CHANGES. AS Q INCREASES HOLDING COST INCREASES BUT ORDER COST DECREASES. HENCE THE TOTAL ANNUAL COST CURVE IS AS SHOWN BELOW - SOMEWHERE ON THAT CURVE LIES A VALUE OF Q THAT CORRESPONDS TO THE MINIMUM TOTAL COST.
  • 12.
    HOW TO CALCULATE EOQ 1. UNDERSTAND AND REVIEW THE FORMULA [2 * (ANNUAL USAGE IN UNITS * ORDER COST) / ANNUAL CARRYING COST PER UNIT]^(1/2). 2. DEFINE THE VARIABLES. 3. CALCULATE THE NUMERATOR 4. DIVIDE THE NUMERATOR BY ANNUAL CARRYING COST PER UNIT 5. TAKE THE SQUARE ROOT
  • 13.
    APPLICATION TO PART OFTHE PURCHASES OF ALMOST EVERY ORGANISATION ELIMINATE BURDEN OF CALCULATION AND ALSO ENABLES THE USE MORE COMPLEX FORMULAS USEFUL FOR MATERIALS THAT HAVE I. REASONABLY STEADY AND PREDICTABLE USAGE II. RELATIVELY LOW COST III. SHORT LEAD TIME