3. Research
• The research gave me an idea of what I could talk about.
• Gave me facts that I could use such as ‘the warriors have 4 former all
stars’.
• It gave me the idea to give different views on why they will win, but also
why they could lose.
• The arguments also helped me think off the script.
• It also helped me to get an age group by listening to what age range the
existing products are.
4. Planning
• Helped me think of 3 different ideas in case I couldn't do one of them, if I
can't get enough research.
• Made me go in depth with my favourite idea, so I know what to put in my
script.
• I put all of my ideas down for both sides of the argument on who will
become NBA champion.
• I could of but more information about what I am going to talk about, talk
about other teams that have a chance of winning the championship.
5. Time Management
• Most of my products where done in time but the final product I think was
rushed a little bit as I was running out of time, because I spent a bit too
much time on the script.
• The initial plans was also a bit rushed for part of it as I all ready had a idea
of what I wanted to do, when I added more detail I did do some research
for it (Spent time on it)
7. Aural Qualities
• I would of liked the audio to be louder, but it
would not go louder.
• I like the intro song being to do with what I
was talking about.
• The audio it self was pretty basic but worked
pretty well.
8. Audience Appeal
The intro song appeals to the audience by showing what the
podcast will be about. The discussion is a well talked problem as
there are different teams that could win the championship, most
don’t think the Celtics will, therefore it will appeal audience as
they will want to hear my reasoning for it.
10. Feedback 1
• What did you like about the product?
– It was a well composed argument with a variety of
reasons.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
– Make the audio louder, as it is hard to hear.
11. Feedback 2
• What did you like about the product?
– It easy to understand what the topic of the
podcast is.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
– There could of been another persons opinion.
12. Feedback 3
• What did you like about the product?
– The intro song really shows what your product is
about.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
– The audio is hard to hear so the volume could
have been louder.
13. Peer Feedback Summary
• What do you agree with from your peer
feedback?
– The audio is too quiet when you listen to it
• What do you disagree with from your peer
feedback?
– There should not of been someone else, as I
provide both sides of the argument using research
and what some of my friends think as well.
14. Peer Feedback Summary
I would make my audio louder and add a bit
more detail based on different peoples opinion,
or base it all on just 2 teams with more detail.
Editor's Notes
What were the strengths of your research? How did your research help your product?
What were the weaknesses of your research? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
What were the strengths of your planning? How did your planning help your product?
What were the weaknesses of your planning? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
Did you manage your time well? Did you complete your project on time or would your products have improved with additional time?
What would you have done if you had more time to produce your work?
Compare your work to similar existing products and discuss the similarities and differences
Does your work sound good? Was it creative? What aspects of your product’s audio do you like? What would you improve? How would you improve it?
Discuss the strengths and weaknesses
How have you appealed to your target audience? What specific bits of content would appeal to your target audience.
Make reference to specific recordings, dialogue, music and sound effects
What changes would you make to your product based upon your peer feedback and why?
