This document discusses two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). It explains that two-way ANOVA allows researchers to study the effects of two independent variables on a single dependent variable. Researchers can test for main effects of each independent variable as well as interactions between the variables. The document provides examples of how to set up a two-way ANOVA study, calculate the relevant statistics, interpret results from ANOVA tables, and draw conclusions about significant main effects and interactions.
Please Subscribe to this Channel for more solutions and lectures
http://www.youtube.com/onlineteaching
Chapter 12: Analysis of Variance
12.2: Two-Way ANOVA
Introduces and explains the use of multiple linear regression, a multivariate correlational statistical technique. For more info, see the lecture page at http://goo.gl/CeBsv. See also the slides for the MLR II lecture http://www.slideshare.net/jtneill/multiple-linear-regression-ii
Please Subscribe to this Channel for more solutions and lectures
http://www.youtube.com/onlineteaching
Chapter 12: Analysis of Variance
12.2: Two-Way ANOVA
Introduces and explains the use of multiple linear regression, a multivariate correlational statistical technique. For more info, see the lecture page at http://goo.gl/CeBsv. See also the slides for the MLR II lecture http://www.slideshare.net/jtneill/multiple-linear-regression-ii
This presentation contains information about Mann Whitney U test, what is it, when to use it and how to use it. I have also put an example so that it may help you to easily understand it.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) everything you need to knowStat Analytica
Most of the students may struggle with the analysis of variance (ANOVA). Here in this presentation you can clear all your doubts in analysis of variance with suitable examples.
Explaining correlation, assumptions,coefficients of correlation, coefficient of determination, variate, partial correlation, assumption, order and hypothesis of partial correlation with example, checking significance and graphical representation of partial correlation.
This presentation contains information about Mann Whitney U test, what is it, when to use it and how to use it. I have also put an example so that it may help you to easily understand it.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) everything you need to knowStat Analytica
Most of the students may struggle with the analysis of variance (ANOVA). Here in this presentation you can clear all your doubts in analysis of variance with suitable examples.
Explaining correlation, assumptions,coefficients of correlation, coefficient of determination, variate, partial correlation, assumption, order and hypothesis of partial correlation with example, checking significance and graphical representation of partial correlation.
Brief presentation of Robin Williams' four principles from The Non-Designers Design Book (Peachpit Press). Organized for classroom presentation in SCI 2777 Storytelling with Data.
Brief example showing Chi-Square computations, the impact of effect size on the Chi-Square statistic, equations for Phi and for Cramer's V, and a narrative write-up of the results. Uses hypothetical data for a Growth Mindset study, and includes supplemental materials on the Growth Mindset research.
Presentation at the Benedictine Pedagogy Conference 2013 at Benedictine University in Lisle, IL. Focus on challenges and opportunities for Benedictine institutions to work with their sponsoring monastic communities to enable continued sponsorship as numbers of monastic women and men decrease.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
2. • Often, we wish to study 2 (or more) factors in a
single experiment
– Compare two or more treatment protocols
– Compare scores of people who are young, middle-aged,
and elderly
• The baseline experiment will therefore have two
factors as Independent Variables
– Treatment type
– Age Group
3. Factorial (Two or more way) ANOVA
• One dependent variable
interval or ratio with a normal distribution
• Two independent variables
nominal (define groups), and independent of each other
• Three hypothesis tests:
Test effect of each independent variable controlling for
the effects of the other independent variable
One: H0: Treatment type has no impact on Outcome
Two: H0: Age Group has no impact on Outcome
Three: Test interaction effect for combinations of categories
H0: Treatment and Age Group interact in affecting Outcome
4. First stage
• Identical to independent samples ANOVA
• Compute SSTotal, SSBetween treatments and
SSWithin treatments
Second stage
• Partition the SSBetween treatments into three
separate components, differences attributable
to Factor A, to Factor B, and to the AxB
interaction
5.
6. The validity of the ANOVA presented in
this chapter depends on three
assumptions common to other hypothesis
tests
1. The observations within each sample must
be independent of each other
2. The populations from which the samples are
selected must be normally distributed
3. The populations from which the samples are
selected must have equal variances
(homogeneity of variance)
8. G
N
SS X total
2
2
2 2
G
N
T
n
SS between treatments
withintreatments inside each treatment SS SS
9.
10. Factorial designs
• Consider more than one factor
• Joint impact of factors is considered.
Three hypotheses tested by three F-ratios
• Each tested with same basic F-ratio structure
variance (differenc es) between treatments
variance (differenc es) expected with no treatment effect
F
11. • Factor 1 (independent variable, e.g. type of crop)
• Always nominal or ordinal (it defines distinct groups)
• Factor 2 (independent variable, e.g., fertilizer)
• Always nominal or ordinal (it defines distinct groups)
• Outcome (dependent variable, e.g. yield)
• Always interval or ratio
• Mean Outcomes of the
groups defined by Factor 1
and Factor 2 are being
compared.
12. Mean differences among levels of one factor
• Differences are tested for statistical significance
• Each factor is evaluated independently of the
other factor(s) in the study
A A
1 2
1 2
:
:
0
1
A A
H
H
B B
1 2
1 2
:
:
0
1
B B
H
H
13. Not the same as experimental control.
Statistical control: we look for the effect of
one independent variable within each group of
the other dependent variable.
This removes the impact of the other
independent variable.
Sometimes a variable which showed no
significant effect in a Oneway ANOVA becomes
significant if another effect is controlled.
14. The mean differences between individuals
treatment conditions, or cells, are different
from what would be predicted from the
overall main effects of the factors
H0: There is no interaction between
Factors A and B
H1: There is an interaction between
Factors A and B
15. • First:
• Does Factor 1 have any
impact on the Outcome?
• Null: The groups defined by
Factor 1 will have the same
Mean Outcome.
• Second:
• Does Factor 2 have any impact on the Outcome?
• Null: The groups defined by Factor 2 will have the
same Mean Outcome.
• Third:
• Do Factor 1 and Factor 2 interact in influencing
Outcome?
• Null: No combination of Factor 1 and Factor 2
produces unusually high or unusually low mean
Outcome scores.
17. From one-way to two-way designs:
• Often, we wish to study 2 (or more) factors in a
single experiment
– Compare a new and standard style of noise filter (inside
a muffler) on a car
– The size of the car might also be an important factor in
noise level.
• The baseline experiment will therefore have two
factors as Independent Variables
– Type of noise filter (Octel vs Standard)
– Size of car (Small, Midsize, Large)
18. Standard Filter Octel Filter
Type of Noise Filter
860
850
840
830
820
810
800
790
780
770
760
Noise Level Reading
Group Statistics
18 815.56 32.217
18 804.72 25.637
Type of Noise Fil ter
Standard Fi l ter
Octel Fi l ter
Noise Level Reading
N Mean Std. Deviation
First Variable: Filter Type
• Nominal – Dichotomy
• Dependent variable is
noise level (ratio level)
Test: Two-Sample t
• Compare means (above)
• View boxplot (at right)
• t (34)=1.116, p = .272
RETAIN H0
Type of filter does not cause a
significant difference in noise.
19. N Mean Std. Dev'n
12 824.17 7.638
12 833.75 13.505
12 772.50 10.335
36 810.14 29.216
Smal l
Mid-Size
Large
Total
Second Variable: Car Size
• Nominal – 3 groups
• Dep.Var: noise level (ratio)
Test: Oneway ANOVA
• Compare means (above)
• View boxplot (at left)
• F (2,33) =112.44, p < .0005
REJECT H0
Size of car is related to a significant
difference in noise.
Small Mid-Size Large
Size of Car
860
840
820
800
780
760
Noise Level Reading
20. ANOVA is significant, so we need Post-hoc Tests.
Groups: Same Size so Test: Tukey HSD
- Small vs Large = Sig.
- Midsize vs Large = Sig.
- Small vs Midsize = n.s.
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Noise Level Reading
Tukey HSD
-9.583 4.394 .089
51.667* 4.394 .000
9.583 4.394 .089
61.250* 4.394 .000
-51.667* 4.394 .000
-61.250* 4.394 .000
(J) Size of Car
Mid-Size
Large
Smal l
Large
Smal l
Mid-Size
(I) Size of Car
Smal l
Mid-Size
Large
Mean
Di fference
(I-J) Std. Error Sig.
The mean di fference is significant *. at the .05 level.
21. Filters – Octel vs Standard
• Independent sample t-test
• No significant differences
Size of Car – Small, Midsize, Large
• ANOVA
• Significant differences
• Large cars are significantly more quiet
BUT – is it possible that the Octel filter might
work better with just one of the types of
cars?
22. Is car size related to noise level, if
effect of filter type is controlled?
Is filter type related to noise level, if
effect of size of car is controlled?
Is there a combination of Size of Car and
Noise Filter Type that is especially loud, or
especially soft?
• called an INTERACTION effect.
Multiple comparison tests
23. Small Mid-Size Large
Size of Car
860
840
820
800
780
760
Noise Level Reading (Decibels)
Type of Noise Filter
Standard Filter
Octel Filter
24. Factorial (Two or more way) ANOVA
• One dependent variable
interval or ratio
normal distribution
• Two independent variables
nominal (define groups)
independent of each other
• Test effect of each I.V. controlling for the effects
of the other I.V.
• Test interaction effect for combinations of
categories
25. Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Dependent Variable: Noise Level Reading (Decibels)
Type III Sum
of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
23655612.5a 6 3942602.083 60269.076 .000
26051.389 2 13025.694 199.119 .000
1056.250 1 1056.250 16.146 .000
804.167 2 402.083 6.146 .006
1962.500 30 65.417
23657575.0 36
Source
Model
size
type
size * type
Error
Total
R Squared = 1.000 (Adjusted a. R Squared = 1.000)
SIZE effect is still significant
TYPE effect is significant when size is controlled
INTERACTION effect is significant
• There is a combination which shows more than the combined
impact of SIZE and TYPE
26. Means of each combination of Size & Type
INTERACTION: Whenever lines not parallel
27. Manufacturers of the new Octel noise filter claim that it
reduces noise levels in cars of all sizes. In a Two-Way
ANOVA, this claim proved to be true. The Size of Car
effect was significant (F(2,36) = 199.119, p < .001). When
the impact of size was controlled, the Filter Type effect
was also significant (F(1,36) = 16.146, p < .001), with the
Octel Filter having lower noise levels than standard filters.
The Interaction effect was also significant (F(2,30) =
6.146, p = .006). For Small cars, the noise difference
between filter types was 3.33; for Large cars it was 5.000,
but Midsize cars with the Octel filter averaged 24.166
points lower on the Noise Level scale.
A complete report would include the Mean and SD of each cell where a
significant difference occurred, either in a table or in narrative. It
would include effect size (η2) for significant effects.
28. A table or graph of group means
A report of the three hypothesis tests:
• One for Factor A
• One for Factor B
• One for the interaction of A with B
Asterisks often used to report hypothesis test results
* = significant with alpha = .05
** = significant with alpha = .01
*** = significant with alpha = .001
If there are more than two factors, there will be more
hypothesis tests for factors, and more interactions.
30. Three distinct tests
• Main effect of Factor A
• Main effect of Factor B
• Interaction of A and B
A separate F test is conducted for each
31. Notation describes procedure
Tables usually used to present
the results
Group means (cell)
Row means
Column means
Each factor is operationalized by one
or more variables (measures)
Images from Trochim’s Research Methods Knowledge Base at
http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/index.php
32. Plot the means of each group (defined as a
combination of Factor 1 and Factor 2)
If all the null hypotheses are true, all the points
will have about the same Mean Outcome level.
33. The two row means
are the same
The two column
means are the
same
All groups have the
same mean score
Neither factor had
any effect
Images from Trochim’s Research Methods Knowledge Base at
http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/index.php
34. Row means: the same
Column means: differ
No score especially high
or especially low
Row means: differ
Column means: the same
No score especially high
or especially low
Images from Trochim’s Research Methods Knowledge Base at
http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/index.php
35. The mean differences between individuals
treatment conditions, or cells, are different
from what would be predicted from the
overall main effects of the factors
H0: There is no interaction between
Factors A and B
H1: There is an interaction between
Factors A and B
36. Row means differ
Column means differ
One group is different
Others are the same
Row means the same
Column means the same
Graph shows that pattern
in one factor depends on
the
status of the other Images from Trochim’s Research Methods Knowledge Base at
http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/index.php
37. Dependence of factors
• The effect of one factor depends on the level
or value of the other
Non-parallel lines (cross or converge) in a
graph
• Indicate interaction is occurring
Typically called the A x B interaction
42. dftotal = N – 1
dfwithin treatments = Σdfinside each treatment
dfbetween treatments = k – 1
dfA = number of rows – 1
dfB = number of columns– 1
dfAxB = dfbetween treatments – dfA – dfB
43. B
SS
SS
MS
A df
within treatments
SS
within treatments
A
MS
within treatments df
AxB
AxB
AxB
B
B
A
SS
MS
df
MS
df
AxB
within
MS
MS
F
A AxB
MS
B
within
B
A
within
MS
F
MS
F
MS
44. η2, is computed as the percentage of
variability not explained by other factors.
A
SS
A SS SS
A within treatments
A
total B AxB
SS
SS SS SS
2
B
SS
B SS SS
B within treatments
B
total A AxB
SS
SS SS SS
2
AxB
SS
AxB SS SS
AxB within treatments
AxB
total A B
SS
SS SS SS
2