TRAUMATIC
OPTIC
NEUROPATHY
DR ARPITA
 “Trauma-induced injury to the optic nerve
occurring anywhere along the nerve’s
intraorbital to intracranial length”.
ANATOMY OF OPTIC NERVE
EPIDEMIOLOGY
 Traumatic optic neuropathy occurs
in 0.5-5 % of patients presenting with
closed head trauma and in 2.5 % of
patients presenting with midfacial fracture
 Young > Old
 Males > Females
Steinsapir KD, Goldberg RA. Traumatic optic neuropathy:a
critical update. Compr Ophthalmol Update. 2005;6(1):11-21.
ETIOLOGY
CLASSIFICATION
DIRECT INJURIES
 Result from objects that penetrate the
orbit and impinge on the optic nerve
causing optic neuropathy by partial or
complete transection of the optic
nerve sheath. Hemorrhages within and
around the nerve may also occur
 Lead to immediate changes in the
fundus which can be detected on
ophthalmoscopic examination
INDIRECT INJURIES
 Indirect TON is caused by the
transmission of forces to the optic nerve
from a distant site without disruption
of normal tissue structures. The
deformative stress transmitted to the
skull from blunt trauma is concentrated
in the region of the optic canal.
INDIRECT INJURIES
 1. Anterior : the central retinal artery
enters and the central retinal vein exits
the optic nerve 8-12 mm posterior to the
insertion of the nerve into the globe.
Injuries anterior to this site are termed
anterior.
 2. Posterior: the injury is posterior to
site of entry of the central retinal artery
and exit of central retinal vein
PATHOGENESIS
 PRIMARY MECHANISM
 Shearing injury – localised ischemia and
optic nerve edema – further ischemia
due to compartment syndrome
 Permanent damage
 SECONDARY MECHANISMS
 1. Ischemia and reperfusion injury
 2. Bradykinin
 3. Calcium ions
 4. Cell mediated mechanisms
CLINICAL FEATURES
 TON is a clinical diagnosis which is
made when there is evidence of optic
neuropathy following a history of a blunt
or a penetrating trauma
 May be associated with multi-system
trauma which needs attention first and
respiratory and cardiovascular
resuscitation and stabilization are
priority.
 History: Mechanism of injury Loss of
consciousness, nausea and/or vomiting,
headache, clear nasal discharge
 Visual acuity –testing may be difficult
depending on the patient's mental status,
use of sedatives, narcotics
 Pupillary evaluation - Relative afferent
papillary defect (RAPD) is the sine qua
non in cases of unilateral TON.
 In the absence of RAPD either there is
no TON or there is bilateral TON
 Globe rupture , IOFB, fracture
 EOM motility
 Color vision - Checking red
desaturation is a useful alternative if
color plates are not available.
 Visual fields – Any type of field defects
may be seen in optic nerve trauma e.g.
 altitudinal, central, paracentral,
hemianopic,etc.
 Fundus examination
INVESTIGATIONS
 Neuroimaging
 VEP
 ERG
D/D
 Ischemic optic neuropathy
 Optic neuritis
 Tumor / aneurysm compressing on
nerve
MANAGEMENT
 Essentially by a multi-disciplinary
approach involving the ophthalmologist,
physician, neuro-surgeon, and an
otorhinolaryngologist
 The optimum management protocol is
yet to be elucidated as there is paucity
of prospective large-scale clinical trials
 Observation
 Steroids
 Surgery
 Primary injury to the optic nerve fibers by
transection or infarction at the time of injury
results in permanent damage.
 Neural dysfunction secondary to compression
within the optic canal, as a result of edema
and hemorrhage, may respond to medical or
surgical intervention.
MEDICAL
 The use of high-dose corticosteroids
after optic nerve injury began in the
1980 s following the report of Anderson
et al
 Anderson RL, Panje WR, Gross CE. Optic nerve blindness following
blunt forehead trauma. Ophthalmology 1982; 89:445–455.
 National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study
2 [NASCIS II], a multicenter clinical trial
that evaluated patients with acute spinal
cord injury
 In this study, patients were treated with
placebo,
 methylprednisolone [MP],
 or naloxone
 The study showed that
Methylprednisolone (30 mg/kg loading
dose, followed by 5.4 mg/kg/h for 24 h)
started within 8 hours of injury was
associated with a significant
improvement in both motor and sensory
function compared to patients treated
with a placebo
 CRASH
 COCHRANE REVIEW
SURGERY
 Fukado et al in the largest series of 400 cases
had suggested good results in optic canal
decompressive surgery
Various surgical approaches for
decompression of the optic canal include
trans-frontal craniotomy, extra-nasal trans-
ethmoidal, trans-nasal trans-ethmoidal, lateral
facial, sublabial and endoscopic approaches
Fukado Y. Results in 400 cases of surgical decompression of the optic
nerve. Mod ProblOphthalmol 1975;14:474–481
INDICATIONS
 Radiologically evident bony fracture
fragment impinging on optic nerve in the
intracanalicular portion , or an optic nerve
sheath hemamtoma in a TON pt with
vision of < 6/60 on presentation
 Failure to improve or deterioration of vision
after 48 hrs of megadose steroid therapy in
a TON pt with , < 6/60 vision at
presentation and with no radiological
evidence of fracture / hematoma in
intracanalicular region of optic nerve
 However, this option should be
approached with extreme caution
because of the proximity to the
cavernous sinus and carotid siphon and
possible bony instability of the skull base
The International Optic Nerve
Trauma Study
 A total of 133 patients who were initially
assessed within 3 days of the optic
nerve injury were treated with
 corticosteroids,
 optic canal decompression surgery,
 or observed without treatment
 Visual acuity increased by 3 or more
lines in
 32% of the surgery group,
 57% of the untreated group,
52% of the steroid group
 The study failed to find benefit for either
corticosteroid therapy or optic canal
decompression
SUMMARY
 Optic nerve laceration: No effective
treatment.
 Optic nerve head avulsion: No
effective treatment.
 Optic nerve sheath hematoma: Optic
nerve sheath fenestration may be
helpful in the acute stage if optic
neuropathy is progressing and no other
cause is evident.
 Deceleration injury : Effective
treatment of posterior indirect TON is, at
best, extremely limited.
In the vast majority of cases,
observation alone is recommended
High-dose corticosteroids should never be
offered by ophthalmologists to patients with
concomitant traumatic brain injury (TBI) or
if the TON is older than 8 hours.
If steroids are considered (no evidence of
TBI, injury within 8-hour window, no
medical comorbidities), the lack of
definitive therapeutic evidence and
significant side effects must be discussed
with the patient and/or family and the
primary team.
 Bone impingement of the optic canal:
Endoscopic optic canal and orbital apex
decompression may be offered in select
cases, especially if the optic neuropathy
is progressive.
 However, this option should be
approached with extreme caution
because of the proximity to the
cavernous sinus and carotid siphon and
possible bony instability of the skull
base.
 The procedure should only be performed
by an otolaryngologist experienced in
stereotactic endoscopic sinus and skull
base surgery.
 The patient and/or family should also be
informed that there is no definitive data that
proves efficacy of this procedure in TON
and that optic canal decompression may
result in additional damage to the
intracanalicular optic nerve
FOLLOW UP
 Daily follow up - acute phase following
trauma, immediately after surgical
therapy, and during the period of mega-
dose corticosteroid therapy.
 Weekly follow up - intermediate period
following trauma, surgery, or
discontinuation of steroid therapy
 Long term - to document the final level
of visual function
Prognosis
 Poor prognostic factors:
 1. Presence of blood within the
posterior ethmoidal cells
 2. Age over 40 years
 3. Loss of consciousness associated
with traumatic optic neuropathy, and
 4. Absence of recovery after 48 hours
of steroid treatment
CURRENT RESEARCH
 Neurotrophic growth factors –
Monosialogliosides
 Gene transfer of anti inflammatory
cytokines
 New family of corticosteroids - lazaroids
Traumatic optic neuropathy

Traumatic optic neuropathy

  • 1.
  • 2.
     “Trauma-induced injuryto the optic nerve occurring anywhere along the nerve’s intraorbital to intracranial length”.
  • 3.
  • 12.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY  Traumatic opticneuropathy occurs in 0.5-5 % of patients presenting with closed head trauma and in 2.5 % of patients presenting with midfacial fracture  Young > Old  Males > Females Steinsapir KD, Goldberg RA. Traumatic optic neuropathy:a critical update. Compr Ophthalmol Update. 2005;6(1):11-21.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
    DIRECT INJURIES  Resultfrom objects that penetrate the orbit and impinge on the optic nerve causing optic neuropathy by partial or complete transection of the optic nerve sheath. Hemorrhages within and around the nerve may also occur  Lead to immediate changes in the fundus which can be detected on ophthalmoscopic examination
  • 18.
    INDIRECT INJURIES  IndirectTON is caused by the transmission of forces to the optic nerve from a distant site without disruption of normal tissue structures. The deformative stress transmitted to the skull from blunt trauma is concentrated in the region of the optic canal.
  • 20.
    INDIRECT INJURIES  1.Anterior : the central retinal artery enters and the central retinal vein exits the optic nerve 8-12 mm posterior to the insertion of the nerve into the globe. Injuries anterior to this site are termed anterior.  2. Posterior: the injury is posterior to site of entry of the central retinal artery and exit of central retinal vein
  • 22.
    PATHOGENESIS  PRIMARY MECHANISM Shearing injury – localised ischemia and optic nerve edema – further ischemia due to compartment syndrome  Permanent damage
  • 23.
     SECONDARY MECHANISMS 1. Ischemia and reperfusion injury  2. Bradykinin  3. Calcium ions  4. Cell mediated mechanisms
  • 24.
    CLINICAL FEATURES  TONis a clinical diagnosis which is made when there is evidence of optic neuropathy following a history of a blunt or a penetrating trauma  May be associated with multi-system trauma which needs attention first and respiratory and cardiovascular resuscitation and stabilization are priority.
  • 25.
     History: Mechanismof injury Loss of consciousness, nausea and/or vomiting, headache, clear nasal discharge  Visual acuity –testing may be difficult depending on the patient's mental status, use of sedatives, narcotics  Pupillary evaluation - Relative afferent papillary defect (RAPD) is the sine qua non in cases of unilateral TON.  In the absence of RAPD either there is no TON or there is bilateral TON
  • 26.
     Globe rupture, IOFB, fracture  EOM motility  Color vision - Checking red desaturation is a useful alternative if color plates are not available.  Visual fields – Any type of field defects may be seen in optic nerve trauma e.g.  altitudinal, central, paracentral, hemianopic,etc.  Fundus examination
  • 27.
  • 28.
    D/D  Ischemic opticneuropathy  Optic neuritis  Tumor / aneurysm compressing on nerve
  • 29.
    MANAGEMENT  Essentially bya multi-disciplinary approach involving the ophthalmologist, physician, neuro-surgeon, and an otorhinolaryngologist  The optimum management protocol is yet to be elucidated as there is paucity of prospective large-scale clinical trials
  • 30.
  • 31.
     Primary injuryto the optic nerve fibers by transection or infarction at the time of injury results in permanent damage.  Neural dysfunction secondary to compression within the optic canal, as a result of edema and hemorrhage, may respond to medical or surgical intervention.
  • 32.
    MEDICAL  The useof high-dose corticosteroids after optic nerve injury began in the 1980 s following the report of Anderson et al  Anderson RL, Panje WR, Gross CE. Optic nerve blindness following blunt forehead trauma. Ophthalmology 1982; 89:445–455.
  • 33.
     National AcuteSpinal Cord Injury Study 2 [NASCIS II], a multicenter clinical trial that evaluated patients with acute spinal cord injury  In this study, patients were treated with placebo,  methylprednisolone [MP],  or naloxone
  • 34.
     The studyshowed that Methylprednisolone (30 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 5.4 mg/kg/h for 24 h) started within 8 hours of injury was associated with a significant improvement in both motor and sensory function compared to patients treated with a placebo
  • 35.
  • 36.
    SURGERY  Fukado etal in the largest series of 400 cases had suggested good results in optic canal decompressive surgery Various surgical approaches for decompression of the optic canal include trans-frontal craniotomy, extra-nasal trans- ethmoidal, trans-nasal trans-ethmoidal, lateral facial, sublabial and endoscopic approaches Fukado Y. Results in 400 cases of surgical decompression of the optic nerve. Mod ProblOphthalmol 1975;14:474–481
  • 37.
    INDICATIONS  Radiologically evidentbony fracture fragment impinging on optic nerve in the intracanalicular portion , or an optic nerve sheath hemamtoma in a TON pt with vision of < 6/60 on presentation  Failure to improve or deterioration of vision after 48 hrs of megadose steroid therapy in a TON pt with , < 6/60 vision at presentation and with no radiological evidence of fracture / hematoma in intracanalicular region of optic nerve
  • 38.
     However, thisoption should be approached with extreme caution because of the proximity to the cavernous sinus and carotid siphon and possible bony instability of the skull base
  • 40.
    The International OpticNerve Trauma Study  A total of 133 patients who were initially assessed within 3 days of the optic nerve injury were treated with  corticosteroids,  optic canal decompression surgery,  or observed without treatment
  • 41.
     Visual acuityincreased by 3 or more lines in  32% of the surgery group,  57% of the untreated group, 52% of the steroid group  The study failed to find benefit for either corticosteroid therapy or optic canal decompression
  • 42.
    SUMMARY  Optic nervelaceration: No effective treatment.  Optic nerve head avulsion: No effective treatment.  Optic nerve sheath hematoma: Optic nerve sheath fenestration may be helpful in the acute stage if optic neuropathy is progressing and no other cause is evident.
  • 43.
     Deceleration injury: Effective treatment of posterior indirect TON is, at best, extremely limited. In the vast majority of cases, observation alone is recommended
  • 44.
    High-dose corticosteroids shouldnever be offered by ophthalmologists to patients with concomitant traumatic brain injury (TBI) or if the TON is older than 8 hours. If steroids are considered (no evidence of TBI, injury within 8-hour window, no medical comorbidities), the lack of definitive therapeutic evidence and significant side effects must be discussed with the patient and/or family and the primary team.
  • 45.
     Bone impingementof the optic canal: Endoscopic optic canal and orbital apex decompression may be offered in select cases, especially if the optic neuropathy is progressive.  However, this option should be approached with extreme caution because of the proximity to the cavernous sinus and carotid siphon and possible bony instability of the skull base.
  • 46.
     The procedureshould only be performed by an otolaryngologist experienced in stereotactic endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery.  The patient and/or family should also be informed that there is no definitive data that proves efficacy of this procedure in TON and that optic canal decompression may result in additional damage to the intracanalicular optic nerve
  • 47.
    FOLLOW UP  Dailyfollow up - acute phase following trauma, immediately after surgical therapy, and during the period of mega- dose corticosteroid therapy.  Weekly follow up - intermediate period following trauma, surgery, or discontinuation of steroid therapy  Long term - to document the final level of visual function
  • 48.
    Prognosis  Poor prognosticfactors:  1. Presence of blood within the posterior ethmoidal cells  2. Age over 40 years  3. Loss of consciousness associated with traumatic optic neuropathy, and  4. Absence of recovery after 48 hours of steroid treatment
  • 49.
    CURRENT RESEARCH  Neurotrophicgrowth factors – Monosialogliosides  Gene transfer of anti inflammatory cytokines  New family of corticosteroids - lazaroids