SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Translation
• The genetic code is, in fact, a nonoverlapping, 
commafree, degenerate, triplet code 
• The code is read in a sequential manner starting 
from a fixed point in the gene. The insertion or 
deletion of a nucleotide shifts the frame 
(grouping) in which succeeding nucleotides are 
read as codons (insertions or deletions of 
nucleotides are therefore also known as 
frameshift mutations). Thus the code has no 
internal punctuation that indicates the reading 
frame; that is, the code is comma free. 
• 3. The code is a triplet code. 
• 4. All or nearly all of the 64 triplet codons code 
for an amino acid; that is, the code is degenerate.
• THE BIG RED FOX ATE THE EGG 
• The deletion of the fourth letter, which shifts 
the reading frame, changes the sentence to 
• THE IGR EDF OXA TET HEE GG 
• THE IGR EDX FOX ATE THE EGG 
• THE BXI GYR EDZ FOX ATE THE EGG
Nature of Genetic Code 
• The code is highly degenerate. 
• The arrangement of the code table is 
nonrandom. 
• UAG,UAA and UGA are stop codons 
• AUG and GUG are chain initiation codons
The “Standard” Genetic Code is not universal
Transfer RNA and its aminoacylation
Two Classes of Aminoacyl–tRNA 
Synthetases 
Class I 
• Arg 
• Cys 
• Gln 
• Glu 
• Ile 
• Leu 
• Met 
• Trp 
• Tyr 
• Val 
Class II 
• Ala 
• Asn 
• Asp 
• Gly 
• His 
• Lys 
• Pro 
• Phe 
• Ser 
• Thr
(b) A 
cartoon comparing the positions of the 3. end of tRNA Ile in its 
complex with Ile RS in its synthetic mode (left) and in its editing 
mode (right). 
Note that there is a cleft running between the editing and synthetic sites and that 
the 3. end of the tRNA continues its A-form helical path in the editing mode but 
assumes a hairpin conformation in the synthetic mode
• The overall reaction catalyzed by Glu-AdT 
occurs in three stages: 
(1) Glutamine is hydrolyzed to glutamate and the 
resulting NH3 sequestered; 
(2) (2) ATP reacts with the Glu side chain of Glu– 
tRNAGln to yield an activated acylphosphate 
intermediate and ADP; and 
(3) the acylphosphate intermediate reacts with 
the NH3 to yield Gln–tRNAGln + Pi
The N-formylmethionine residue (fMet) already has an amide bond and can therefore 
only be the N-terminal residue of a polypeptide. The tRNA that recognizes the initiation 
codon, tRNAf Met, differs from the tRNA that carries internal Met residues, tRNAm 
Met, although they both recognize recognize the same codon In E. coli, uncharged 
(deacylated) tRNAf Met is first aminoacylated with methionine by the same MetRS that 
charges tRNAm Met.The resulting Met–tRNAf Met is specifically N-formylated to yield 
fMet–tRNAf Met in an enzymatic reaction that employs N10-formyltetrahydrofolate as 
its formyl donor. The formylation enzyme does not recognize Met–tRNAm Met.
• The process begins with the binding of eIF3 (which 
in mammals consists of 13 different subunits) and 
eIF1A (a monomer and homolog of bacterial IF-1) to 
the 40S subunit in the inactive 80S ribosome (which 
had terminated elongation in its previous elongation 
cycle) so that it releases the 60S subunit. 
• 2. The ternary complex of eIF2 (a heterotrimer), 
GTP, and Met-tRNAimet binds to the 40S ribosomal 
subunit accompanied by eIF1 (a monomer) to form 
the so-called 43S preinitiation complex. Here the 
subscript “i” on tRNAiMet distinguishes this 
eukaryotic initiator tRNA, whose appended Met 
residue is never N-formylated, from that of 
prokaryotes; both species are, nevertheless, readily 
interchangeable in vitro.
• Eukaryotic mRNAs lack the complementary sequences 
to bind to the 18S rRNA in the Shine–Dalgarno manner. 
Rather, they have an entirely different mechanism for 
recognizing the mRNA’s initiating AUG codon. 
Eukaryotic mRNAs, nearly all of which have an m7G 
cap and a poly(A) tail, are invariably monocistronic and 
almost always initiate translation at their leading AUG. 
This AUG, which occurs at the end of a 5’-untranslated 
region of 50 to 70 nt, is embedded in the consensus 
sequence GCCRCCAUGG, with changes in the purine 
(R) 3 nt before the AUG and the G immediately 
following it reducing translational efficiency by 10-fold 
each and with other changes having much smaller 
effects. In addition, secondary structure (stem–loops) 
in the mRNA upstream of the initiation site may affect 
initiation efficiency.
• The recognition of the initiation site begins by 
the binding of eIF4F to the m7G cap. eIF4F is 
a heterotrimeric complex of eIF4E, eIF4G, and 
eIF4A (all monomers), in which eIF4E (cap-binding 
protein) recognizes the mRNA’s m7G 
cap and eIF4G serves as a scaffold to join 
eIF4E with eIF4A.
• eIF4B (an RRM-containing homodimer) and 
eIF4H (a monomer) join the eIF4F–mRNA 
complex where they stimulate the RNA 
helicase activity of eIF4A to unwind the 
mRNA’s helical segments in an ATP-dependent 
process. 
• The eIF4F–mRNA–eIF4B–eIF4H complex joins 
the 43S preinitiation complex through a 
protein–protein interaction between eIF4G 
and the 40S subunit-bound eIF3.
• eIF5 (a monomer) joins the growing assembly. 
The 43S preinitiation complex then translocates 
along the mRNA, an ATP-dependent process 
called scanning, until it encounters the mRNA’s 
AUG initiation codon, which is optimally in the 
sequence GCC(A/G)CCAUGG. This yields the 48S 
preinitiation complex. The recognition of the 
AUG occurs mainly through base pairing with 
the CUA anticodon on the bound Met-tRNAiMet , 
as was demonstrated by the observation that 
mutating this anticodon results in the 
recognition of the new cognate codon instead of 
AUG. This explains why the initiator tRNA must 
bind to the small subunit before the mRNA.
• The formation of the 48S preinitiation complex 
induces eIF2 to hydrolyze its bound GTP to GDP + 
Pi, which results in the release of all the initiation 
factors, thereby leaving the Met-tRNA iMet in the 
small subunit’s P site.The hydrolysis reaction is 
stimulated by eIF5, acting as a GAP. 
• The 60S subunit then joins the mRNA-bound 
Met–tRNAiMet 40S subunit complex in a GTPase 
reaction mediated by eIF5B (a monomer and 
homolog of bacterial IF-2), thereby yielding the 
80S ribosomal initiation complex. Thus eukaryotic 
translation initiation consumes two GTPs versus 
one for prokaryotic initiation
• What remains is to recycle the eIF2 GDP 
complex by exchanging its GDP for GTP. This 
reaction is mediated by eIF2B (a 
heteropentamer), which therefore functions 
as eIF2’s GEF (guanine nucleotide exchange 
factor.
Translation lecture

More Related Content

What's hot

3.05 dna replication
3.05 dna replication3.05 dna replication
3.05 dna replication
Dr. John
 
The R T K R A S M E K Signaling Pathway By Lenard Tardio
The  R T K  R A S  M E K  Signaling  Pathway By  Lenard  TardioThe  R T K  R A S  M E K  Signaling  Pathway By  Lenard  Tardio
The R T K R A S M E K Signaling Pathway By Lenard Tardio
Dickinson Lab Lab
 
3.22.2010
3.22.20103.22.2010
3.22.2010
Greg
 

What's hot (19)

Translation
Translation Translation
Translation
 
Translation and its regulation post translational modification
Translation and its regulation   post translational modification  Translation and its regulation   post translational modification
Translation and its regulation post translational modification
 
Gene expression
Gene expressionGene expression
Gene expression
 
Translation in eukaryotes
Translation in eukaryotesTranslation in eukaryotes
Translation in eukaryotes
 
Translation in prokaryotes and eukaryotes
Translation in prokaryotes and eukaryotesTranslation in prokaryotes and eukaryotes
Translation in prokaryotes and eukaryotes
 
Eukaryotic translation pathway
Eukaryotic translation pathwayEukaryotic translation pathway
Eukaryotic translation pathway
 
translation mechinary
translation mechinarytranslation mechinary
translation mechinary
 
Campbell6e lecture ch12
Campbell6e lecture ch12Campbell6e lecture ch12
Campbell6e lecture ch12
 
3.05 dna replication
3.05 dna replication3.05 dna replication
3.05 dna replication
 
Eukaryotic translation
Eukaryotic translationEukaryotic translation
Eukaryotic translation
 
translation cycle, protein synnthesis
translation cycle, protein synnthesistranslation cycle, protein synnthesis
translation cycle, protein synnthesis
 
Gene expression in euaryotes
Gene expression in euaryotesGene expression in euaryotes
Gene expression in euaryotes
 
Divakaran Molecular level of Eukaryotic translation
Divakaran Molecular level of Eukaryotic translationDivakaran Molecular level of Eukaryotic translation
Divakaran Molecular level of Eukaryotic translation
 
Protein targeting(vani ma'am)291020
Protein targeting(vani ma'am)291020Protein targeting(vani ma'am)291020
Protein targeting(vani ma'am)291020
 
The R T K R A S M E K Signaling Pathway By Lenard Tardio
The  R T K  R A S  M E K  Signaling  Pathway By  Lenard  TardioThe  R T K  R A S  M E K  Signaling  Pathway By  Lenard  Tardio
The R T K R A S M E K Signaling Pathway By Lenard Tardio
 
Protein synathesis in eukariyotes
Protein synathesis in eukariyotesProtein synathesis in eukariyotes
Protein synathesis in eukariyotes
 
Translation
TranslationTranslation
Translation
 
3.22.2010
3.22.20103.22.2010
3.22.2010
 
Cellular signaling
Cellular signalingCellular signaling
Cellular signaling
 

Viewers also liked (7)

Cloning
CloningCloning
Cloning
 
Recombination
RecombinationRecombination
Recombination
 
Site specific recombination
Site specific recombination Site specific recombination
Site specific recombination
 
Dna recombination mechanisms new
Dna recombination mechanisms newDna recombination mechanisms new
Dna recombination mechanisms new
 
homologus recombination
homologus recombinationhomologus recombination
homologus recombination
 
Bacteriophage
BacteriophageBacteriophage
Bacteriophage
 
Homologous Recombination (HR)
Homologous Recombination (HR)Homologous Recombination (HR)
Homologous Recombination (HR)
 

Similar to Translation lecture

Translation and microbial protein production
Translation and microbial protein productionTranslation and microbial protein production
Translation and microbial protein production
mithu mehr
 
Translation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes
Translation  in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes Translation  in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes
Translation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes
Ikram Ullah
 
Translation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes
Translation in Prokaryotes and EukaryotesTranslation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes
Translation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes
Ikram Ullah
 
Synthesis of proteins__regulation_11
Synthesis of proteins__regulation_11Synthesis of proteins__regulation_11
Synthesis of proteins__regulation_11
MUBOSScz
 
4. Translation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes.pdf
4. Translation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes.pdf4. Translation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes.pdf
4. Translation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes.pdf
TakondwaMitomoni
 
4. Translation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes.pdf
4. Translation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes.pdf4. Translation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes.pdf
4. Translation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes.pdf
TakondwaMitomoni
 

Similar to Translation lecture (20)

Translation in Pro and Eu karyotes
Translation in Pro  and Eu karyotesTranslation in Pro  and Eu karyotes
Translation in Pro and Eu karyotes
 
Translation
Translation  Translation
Translation
 
TRANSLATION
TRANSLATIONTRANSLATION
TRANSLATION
 
translation process.pptx
translation process.pptxtranslation process.pptx
translation process.pptx
 
Protein synthesis.ppt
Protein synthesis.pptProtein synthesis.ppt
Protein synthesis.ppt
 
Translation and microbial protein production
Translation and microbial protein productionTranslation and microbial protein production
Translation and microbial protein production
 
Biomol-Translation Eukaryote.pptx
Biomol-Translation Eukaryote.pptxBiomol-Translation Eukaryote.pptx
Biomol-Translation Eukaryote.pptx
 
Protein synthesis
Protein synthesisProtein synthesis
Protein synthesis
 
Translation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes
Translation  in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes Translation  in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes
Translation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes
 
Translation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes
Translation in Prokaryotes and EukaryotesTranslation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes
Translation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes
 
Translation(molecular biology)
Translation(molecular biology)Translation(molecular biology)
Translation(molecular biology)
 
M Rna.Translation
M Rna.TranslationM Rna.Translation
M Rna.Translation
 
Prokaryotic translation
Prokaryotic translationProkaryotic translation
Prokaryotic translation
 
Synthesis of proteins__regulation_11
Synthesis of proteins__regulation_11Synthesis of proteins__regulation_11
Synthesis of proteins__regulation_11
 
translation
translation translation
translation
 
Lecture 6. Protein synthesis.ppt
Lecture 6. Protein synthesis.pptLecture 6. Protein synthesis.ppt
Lecture 6. Protein synthesis.ppt
 
Translation in prokaryotes
Translation in prokaryotesTranslation in prokaryotes
Translation in prokaryotes
 
Translation
TranslationTranslation
Translation
 
4. Translation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes.pdf
4. Translation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes.pdf4. Translation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes.pdf
4. Translation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes.pdf
 
4. Translation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes.pdf
4. Translation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes.pdf4. Translation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes.pdf
4. Translation in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes.pdf
 

More from Sidra Shaffique (13)

chromatofocusing, 2 de, ief
chromatofocusing, 2 de, iefchromatofocusing, 2 de, ief
chromatofocusing, 2 de, ief
 
POST TRANSCRIPTIONAL MODIFICATIONS IN EUKARYOTES
POST TRANSCRIPTIONAL MODIFICATIONS IN EUKARYOTESPOST TRANSCRIPTIONAL MODIFICATIONS IN EUKARYOTES
POST TRANSCRIPTIONAL MODIFICATIONS IN EUKARYOTES
 
Transcription NEW
Transcription NEWTranscription NEW
Transcription NEW
 
Lysozyme Enzymology
Lysozyme EnzymologyLysozyme Enzymology
Lysozyme Enzymology
 
6 carboxypeptidase mechanism
6  carboxypeptidase mechanism6  carboxypeptidase mechanism
6 carboxypeptidase mechanism
 
Lecture 5 hplc gc mass
Lecture 5 hplc gc massLecture 5 hplc gc mass
Lecture 5 hplc gc mass
 
rRNA anr tRNA post transcriptional modifications
rRNA anr tRNA post transcriptional modificationsrRNA anr tRNA post transcriptional modifications
rRNA anr tRNA post transcriptional modifications
 
Surface tension (2)
Surface tension (2)Surface tension (2)
Surface tension (2)
 
Lecture 3 biochemical technique (2)
Lecture 3 biochemical technique (2)Lecture 3 biochemical technique (2)
Lecture 3 biochemical technique (2)
 
Lect 1 biochemiical
Lect 1 biochemiicalLect 1 biochemiical
Lect 1 biochemiical
 
Dialysis lecture 3
Dialysis lecture 3Dialysis lecture 3
Dialysis lecture 3
 
Chromatography (paper chromatography and tlc)
Chromatography (paper chromatography and tlc)Chromatography (paper chromatography and tlc)
Chromatography (paper chromatography and tlc)
 
second generation of DNA Sequencing
second generation of DNA Sequencingsecond generation of DNA Sequencing
second generation of DNA Sequencing
 

Recently uploaded

Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdfAdditional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
joachimlavalley1
 

Recently uploaded (20)

How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS Module
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS ModuleHow to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS Module
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS Module
 
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
 
Matatag-Curriculum and the 21st Century Skills Presentation.pptx
Matatag-Curriculum and the 21st Century Skills Presentation.pptxMatatag-Curriculum and the 21st Century Skills Presentation.pptx
Matatag-Curriculum and the 21st Century Skills Presentation.pptx
 
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with MechanismOverview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
 
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptxSupporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
 
Salient features of Environment protection Act 1986.pptx
Salient features of Environment protection Act 1986.pptxSalient features of Environment protection Act 1986.pptx
Salient features of Environment protection Act 1986.pptx
 
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfWelcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
 
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumersBasic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
 
Basic_QTL_Marker-assisted_Selection_Sourabh.ppt
Basic_QTL_Marker-assisted_Selection_Sourabh.pptBasic_QTL_Marker-assisted_Selection_Sourabh.ppt
Basic_QTL_Marker-assisted_Selection_Sourabh.ppt
 
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativeEmbracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
 
Basic Civil Engineering Notes of Chapter-6, Topic- Ecosystem, Biodiversity G...
Basic Civil Engineering Notes of Chapter-6,  Topic- Ecosystem, Biodiversity G...Basic Civil Engineering Notes of Chapter-6,  Topic- Ecosystem, Biodiversity G...
Basic Civil Engineering Notes of Chapter-6, Topic- Ecosystem, Biodiversity G...
 
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
 
How to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
How to Break the cycle of negative ThoughtsHow to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
How to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
 
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve Thomason
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve ThomasonThe Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve Thomason
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve Thomason
 
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdfHome assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
 
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxStudents, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
 
INU_CAPSTONEDESIGN_비밀번호486_업로드용 발표자료.pdf
INU_CAPSTONEDESIGN_비밀번호486_업로드용 발표자료.pdfINU_CAPSTONEDESIGN_비밀번호486_업로드용 발표자료.pdf
INU_CAPSTONEDESIGN_비밀번호486_업로드용 발표자료.pdf
 
Danh sách HSG Bộ môn cấp trường - Cấp THPT.pdf
Danh sách HSG Bộ môn cấp trường - Cấp THPT.pdfDanh sách HSG Bộ môn cấp trường - Cấp THPT.pdf
Danh sách HSG Bộ môn cấp trường - Cấp THPT.pdf
 
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdfAdditional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
 

Translation lecture

  • 2. • The genetic code is, in fact, a nonoverlapping, commafree, degenerate, triplet code • The code is read in a sequential manner starting from a fixed point in the gene. The insertion or deletion of a nucleotide shifts the frame (grouping) in which succeeding nucleotides are read as codons (insertions or deletions of nucleotides are therefore also known as frameshift mutations). Thus the code has no internal punctuation that indicates the reading frame; that is, the code is comma free. • 3. The code is a triplet code. • 4. All or nearly all of the 64 triplet codons code for an amino acid; that is, the code is degenerate.
  • 3. • THE BIG RED FOX ATE THE EGG • The deletion of the fourth letter, which shifts the reading frame, changes the sentence to • THE IGR EDF OXA TET HEE GG • THE IGR EDX FOX ATE THE EGG • THE BXI GYR EDZ FOX ATE THE EGG
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6. Nature of Genetic Code • The code is highly degenerate. • The arrangement of the code table is nonrandom. • UAG,UAA and UGA are stop codons • AUG and GUG are chain initiation codons
  • 7. The “Standard” Genetic Code is not universal
  • 8. Transfer RNA and its aminoacylation
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12. Two Classes of Aminoacyl–tRNA Synthetases Class I • Arg • Cys • Gln • Glu • Ile • Leu • Met • Trp • Tyr • Val Class II • Ala • Asn • Asp • Gly • His • Lys • Pro • Phe • Ser • Thr
  • 13. (b) A cartoon comparing the positions of the 3. end of tRNA Ile in its complex with Ile RS in its synthetic mode (left) and in its editing mode (right). Note that there is a cleft running between the editing and synthetic sites and that the 3. end of the tRNA continues its A-form helical path in the editing mode but assumes a hairpin conformation in the synthetic mode
  • 14.
  • 15. • The overall reaction catalyzed by Glu-AdT occurs in three stages: (1) Glutamine is hydrolyzed to glutamate and the resulting NH3 sequestered; (2) (2) ATP reacts with the Glu side chain of Glu– tRNAGln to yield an activated acylphosphate intermediate and ADP; and (3) the acylphosphate intermediate reacts with the NH3 to yield Gln–tRNAGln + Pi
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20. The N-formylmethionine residue (fMet) already has an amide bond and can therefore only be the N-terminal residue of a polypeptide. The tRNA that recognizes the initiation codon, tRNAf Met, differs from the tRNA that carries internal Met residues, tRNAm Met, although they both recognize recognize the same codon In E. coli, uncharged (deacylated) tRNAf Met is first aminoacylated with methionine by the same MetRS that charges tRNAm Met.The resulting Met–tRNAf Met is specifically N-formylated to yield fMet–tRNAf Met in an enzymatic reaction that employs N10-formyltetrahydrofolate as its formyl donor. The formylation enzyme does not recognize Met–tRNAm Met.
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 26.
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29. • The process begins with the binding of eIF3 (which in mammals consists of 13 different subunits) and eIF1A (a monomer and homolog of bacterial IF-1) to the 40S subunit in the inactive 80S ribosome (which had terminated elongation in its previous elongation cycle) so that it releases the 60S subunit. • 2. The ternary complex of eIF2 (a heterotrimer), GTP, and Met-tRNAimet binds to the 40S ribosomal subunit accompanied by eIF1 (a monomer) to form the so-called 43S preinitiation complex. Here the subscript “i” on tRNAiMet distinguishes this eukaryotic initiator tRNA, whose appended Met residue is never N-formylated, from that of prokaryotes; both species are, nevertheless, readily interchangeable in vitro.
  • 30. • Eukaryotic mRNAs lack the complementary sequences to bind to the 18S rRNA in the Shine–Dalgarno manner. Rather, they have an entirely different mechanism for recognizing the mRNA’s initiating AUG codon. Eukaryotic mRNAs, nearly all of which have an m7G cap and a poly(A) tail, are invariably monocistronic and almost always initiate translation at their leading AUG. This AUG, which occurs at the end of a 5’-untranslated region of 50 to 70 nt, is embedded in the consensus sequence GCCRCCAUGG, with changes in the purine (R) 3 nt before the AUG and the G immediately following it reducing translational efficiency by 10-fold each and with other changes having much smaller effects. In addition, secondary structure (stem–loops) in the mRNA upstream of the initiation site may affect initiation efficiency.
  • 31. • The recognition of the initiation site begins by the binding of eIF4F to the m7G cap. eIF4F is a heterotrimeric complex of eIF4E, eIF4G, and eIF4A (all monomers), in which eIF4E (cap-binding protein) recognizes the mRNA’s m7G cap and eIF4G serves as a scaffold to join eIF4E with eIF4A.
  • 32. • eIF4B (an RRM-containing homodimer) and eIF4H (a monomer) join the eIF4F–mRNA complex where they stimulate the RNA helicase activity of eIF4A to unwind the mRNA’s helical segments in an ATP-dependent process. • The eIF4F–mRNA–eIF4B–eIF4H complex joins the 43S preinitiation complex through a protein–protein interaction between eIF4G and the 40S subunit-bound eIF3.
  • 33. • eIF5 (a monomer) joins the growing assembly. The 43S preinitiation complex then translocates along the mRNA, an ATP-dependent process called scanning, until it encounters the mRNA’s AUG initiation codon, which is optimally in the sequence GCC(A/G)CCAUGG. This yields the 48S preinitiation complex. The recognition of the AUG occurs mainly through base pairing with the CUA anticodon on the bound Met-tRNAiMet , as was demonstrated by the observation that mutating this anticodon results in the recognition of the new cognate codon instead of AUG. This explains why the initiator tRNA must bind to the small subunit before the mRNA.
  • 34. • The formation of the 48S preinitiation complex induces eIF2 to hydrolyze its bound GTP to GDP + Pi, which results in the release of all the initiation factors, thereby leaving the Met-tRNA iMet in the small subunit’s P site.The hydrolysis reaction is stimulated by eIF5, acting as a GAP. • The 60S subunit then joins the mRNA-bound Met–tRNAiMet 40S subunit complex in a GTPase reaction mediated by eIF5B (a monomer and homolog of bacterial IF-2), thereby yielding the 80S ribosomal initiation complex. Thus eukaryotic translation initiation consumes two GTPs versus one for prokaryotic initiation
  • 35. • What remains is to recycle the eIF2 GDP complex by exchanging its GDP for GTP. This reaction is mediated by eIF2B (a heteropentamer), which therefore functions as eIF2’s GEF (guanine nucleotide exchange factor.