UNIT II
C. QUALITY CONTROL
OF TABLETS
Ms. TENY SARA THOMAS
MOUNT ZION COLLEGE OF PHARMACEUTICAL
SCIENCES AND RESEARCH, ADOOR, KERALA
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
B.PHARM FIFTH SEMESTER
FORMULATIVE & INDUSTRIAL PHARMACY
CONTENTS
 Non – Official Tests of Quality Control of Tablets
 Official Tests of Quality Control of Tablets
INTRODUCTION
In Process Quality Control tests are
routinely run to monitor the compression and
manufacturing process.
Quality Control Tests are generally
divided into two :-
1. Non – Official Tests
2. Official Tests
NON – OFFICIAL TESTS
GENERALAPPEARANCE
TESTS
SIZE &
SHAPE
IDENTIFICATION
MARKINGS
ORGANOLEPTIC
PROPERTIES
GENERALAPPEARENCE
General appearance of a tablet is essential for
consumers acceptance, for control of batch to batch
uniformity, or tablet to tablet uniformity.
This involves the evaluation of :- size, shape, colour,
odour, taste, surface texture, physical flaws,
consistency, and legibility of identification markings.
1. SIZE & SHAPE
Should dimensionally described, monitored
and controlled.
Thickness of the tablet may be measured
using micrometer, or sliding caliper scale .
Physical dimensions control the weight of
the tablet.
MICROMETER
SLIDING
CALIPER
SCALE
II. IDENTIFICATION MARKINGS
Manufacturing companies use unique
markings on the tablet, in addition to the
colour used :- rapid identification of the
product.
Identification markings include :- symbols,
company name, product code, product name,
or product potency
Therefore markings on the tablet should be
evaluated for a quality product.
III. ORGANOLEPTIC PROPERTIES
Uniformity of the colour must be achieved within
the batch of tablets. Non –uniformity of the colour
shows a poor product.
Presence of odour in a batch of tablets could
indicate a stability problem, such as poor smelling
odour in aspirins, if acetic acid in the tablet
degrades. However, presence of odour in some
tablets could be a character of the tablets, such as
flavourful odour in vitamin tablets.
A tablet level of defects such as chips, cracks,
contamination from foreign substances (presence
of hair, oil droplets, or dirt), surface texture
(smooth or rough), appearance (dull or shiny)
should be evaluated – should be zero defect.
OFFICIAL TESTS
9 TYPES
HARDNESS
CONTENT
UNIFORMITY
FRIABILTY
API % TEST
DISINTEGRATION
TEST
% WEIGHT GAIN
IN COATED
TABLETS
THICKNESS OF
FILM IN COATED
TABLETS
DISSOLUTION
TEST
WEIGHT
VARATION
HARDNESS TEST
Tablets require a certain amount of strength or
hardness during transportation and handling.
Generally, greater compression force is applied,
harder the tablets,
Certain tablets such as lozenges or buccal tablets are
intended to dissolve slowly, so they are made
intentionally hard.
For tablets meant for immediate release, they are
intentionally made soft.
Tablets should be sufficiently hard to resist breaking
during normal handling and soft enough to
disintegrate properly after swallowing.
APPARATUS 1- MONSANTO HARDNESS
TESTER
This apparatus has a spring, screw knob, and a
graduated scale.
The reading on the graduated scale is adjusted to
zero.
The tablet to be tested is placed between the anvil
and spindle .
The screw knob moves forward until the tablet
breaks.
Note down the reading on the graduated scale,
which indicates the force required to break the
tablet. The force is measured in kilograms.
ANVIL
TABLET
SPINDLE
SCREW
KNOB
GRADUATED
SCALE
APPARATUS I1- PFIZER TESTER
The tablet to be tested is placed between the jaws
of the apparatus.
The reading on the pressure dial is adjusted to zero.
Then the press the plier like handle with hands.
Reading on the pressure dial is noted which
indicates the force required in kilogram or pound –
which is the force required to break the tablets.
PRESSURE
DIAL
TABLET
PLIER LIKE PRESS
FRIABILITY TEST
Done to check the ability of a tablet to break into
smaller pieces under pressure, mechanical shock, or
stress during handling and transportation.
Strength of the tablet plays an important role in
the dissolution and disintegration of the tablet.
After the friability test, tablets are inspected for
breakage and the percentage of tablet mass lost
through chipping.
APPARATUS – ROCHE FRIABILATOR
Consists of a drum or plastic chamber having diameter
283-291mm and a depth of 36-40mm.
Rotation speed of drum is 25rpm.
Carefully weigh 20 tablets and place them in a plastic
chamber and rotate it for 4 minutes or set 100 number of
rotations.
During each revolution, tablets fall from a distance of
about 6 inches. After 100 revolutions or 4 minutes,
remove the tablets from the chamber.
Dust the tablets and reweigh the tablets.
Percentage weight loss is calculated.
If there is a loss in weight, this indicates friability.
Loss of 0.5-1% of the weight is considered acceptable.
WEIGHT VARIATION TEST
20 tablets are randomly selected and weighed individually.
Average weight of the 20 tablets are also calculated.
Individual weight is compared with the average weight.
Not more than the individual weight of two tablets may
deviate from the average weight, by more than the
percentage deviation.
AVERAGE WEIGHT PERCENTAGE
80mg or less 10
8-250mg 7.5
250mg or more 5
CONTENT UNIFORMITY TEST
According to United States Pharmacopoeia, 10
tablets are assayed individually.
Out of this, 9 tablets should not contain less than
85% or more than 115% of the labelled drug content.
10th tablet should not contain less than 75% or more
than 125% of the labelled drug content.
ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL
PERCENTAGE TEST
Percentage of medicament or active pharmaceutical
ingredient, are calculated by taking sample of tablets
and then assay is carried out.
Result of the tablets should be within the prescribed
percentage limit in pharmacopoeia.
DISINTEGRATION TEST
Generally, when a drug is taken, it should be readily
available to the body.
First important step of a tablet to be readily available
:- breakdown of the tablet into smaller particles or
granules – process is called Disintegration.
Time taken for a tablet to disintegrate is
measured in a device described in the USP.
Disintegration is mainly used as a guide for the
formulator in preparing an optimum tablet
formulation.
APPARATUS – DISINTEGRATION
APPARATUS
The USP device for disintegration comprises – 6
glass tubes that are 3 inches long, open at the top,
and closed at the bottom with a 10 mesh screen in the
basket rack assembly.
One tablet is placed in each tube and a perforated
plastic disc is placed over the tablet.
The basket rack is positioned in a 1litre beaker of
water or simulated gastric fluid or intestinal fluid, at
37℃.
The assembly moves up and down at a specified rate
using the help of a standard motor driven device.
Time taken to disintegrate the tablets, and all
particles must pass through the 10 mesh screen in
the standard time.
Uncoated tablets :- water is used a disintegration
medium, and all 6 tablets should disintegrate within 15
minutes.
Sugar Coated tablets :- all tablets should disintegrate
within 1 hour. If a tablet does not pass the test, the
disintegration medium is changed from water to 0.1M
HCl, and the test is repeated. Failure in this, will lead to
rejection of the whole batch.
Film coated tablets :- tablets should disintegrate in 30
minutes.
Enteric coated tablets :- test is carried out for 2 hours
first in 0.1 M HCl, and the tablets should not disintegrate.
Then the tablets are tested with a simulated intestinal
fluid for the next hour.
DISSOLUTION TEST
Dissolution test is carried out to :-
Show that the drug is released up to 100%.
Show that the drug release is uniform batch to
batch.
There are different types of dissolution apparatus
according to the United States Pharmacopoeia.
In general, dissolution apparatus consists of a cylindrical
flask with a hemispherical bottom, made of glass or
transparent plastic having 1000ml volume capacity.
Flask is partially immersed in a temperature bath
maintained at 37℃.
Flask is fitted with a cover having 4 holes – one hole for the
shaft with a basket or paddle, second for thermometer, and
other holes for sampling.
Other end of the shaft is attached to variable speed driven
motor that rotates at 25-150 rpm.
Dissolution test is first conducted with 6 tablets, if a failure
occurs the test is repeated with 6 tablets. On failure again,
the test is repeated with 12 tablets.
APPARATUS I – ROTATING BASKET TYPE
A cylindrical basket is placed at the end of the
shaft, constructing with a non reactive mesh.
Tablet is placed in the basket, and the pores in the
mesh allow the dissolving drug to move from the
basket to the holding flask.
Start motor and seed is adjusted to 100 rom.
At a specified time interval, sample is withdrawn
and the same volume of dissolution medium is
replaced.
Samples are tested by UV spectroscopy, or
chromatography.
APPARATUS II – PADDLE TYPE
Rotating shaft is fixed to a blade attached
vertically at the end.
The blade is meant to act as a stirrer to ix the
drug being tested with the liquid.
Drug is placed in the flask.
Start motor and seed is adjusted to 100 rom.
At a specified time interval, sample is withdrawn
and the same volume of dissolution medium is
replaced.
Samples are tested by UV spectroscopy, or
chromatography.
PERCENTAGE OF WEIGHT GAIN IN
COATED TABLETS
Difference in weight of the final product and the
initial uncoated tablet is calculated and the percentage
is noted and checked according to the standard values
in the pharmacopoeia.
THICKNESS OF FILM IN COATED
TABLETS
Difference in the thickness of the coated tablet and
uncoated tablet is measured using a micrometer or
sliding caliper scale.
Note the value is noted and checked according to the
standard values in the pharmacopoeia.

QUALITY CONTROL OF TABLETS

  • 1.
    UNIT II C. QUALITYCONTROL OF TABLETS Ms. TENY SARA THOMAS MOUNT ZION COLLEGE OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH, ADOOR, KERALA ASSISTANT PROFESSOR B.PHARM FIFTH SEMESTER FORMULATIVE & INDUSTRIAL PHARMACY
  • 2.
    CONTENTS  Non –Official Tests of Quality Control of Tablets  Official Tests of Quality Control of Tablets
  • 3.
    INTRODUCTION In Process QualityControl tests are routinely run to monitor the compression and manufacturing process. Quality Control Tests are generally divided into two :- 1. Non – Official Tests 2. Official Tests
  • 4.
    NON – OFFICIALTESTS GENERALAPPEARANCE TESTS SIZE & SHAPE IDENTIFICATION MARKINGS ORGANOLEPTIC PROPERTIES
  • 5.
    GENERALAPPEARENCE General appearance ofa tablet is essential for consumers acceptance, for control of batch to batch uniformity, or tablet to tablet uniformity. This involves the evaluation of :- size, shape, colour, odour, taste, surface texture, physical flaws, consistency, and legibility of identification markings.
  • 6.
    1. SIZE &SHAPE Should dimensionally described, monitored and controlled. Thickness of the tablet may be measured using micrometer, or sliding caliper scale . Physical dimensions control the weight of the tablet.
  • 7.
  • 8.
    II. IDENTIFICATION MARKINGS Manufacturingcompanies use unique markings on the tablet, in addition to the colour used :- rapid identification of the product. Identification markings include :- symbols, company name, product code, product name, or product potency Therefore markings on the tablet should be evaluated for a quality product.
  • 9.
    III. ORGANOLEPTIC PROPERTIES Uniformityof the colour must be achieved within the batch of tablets. Non –uniformity of the colour shows a poor product. Presence of odour in a batch of tablets could indicate a stability problem, such as poor smelling odour in aspirins, if acetic acid in the tablet degrades. However, presence of odour in some tablets could be a character of the tablets, such as flavourful odour in vitamin tablets. A tablet level of defects such as chips, cracks, contamination from foreign substances (presence of hair, oil droplets, or dirt), surface texture (smooth or rough), appearance (dull or shiny) should be evaluated – should be zero defect.
  • 10.
    OFFICIAL TESTS 9 TYPES HARDNESS CONTENT UNIFORMITY FRIABILTY API% TEST DISINTEGRATION TEST % WEIGHT GAIN IN COATED TABLETS THICKNESS OF FILM IN COATED TABLETS DISSOLUTION TEST WEIGHT VARATION
  • 11.
    HARDNESS TEST Tablets requirea certain amount of strength or hardness during transportation and handling. Generally, greater compression force is applied, harder the tablets, Certain tablets such as lozenges or buccal tablets are intended to dissolve slowly, so they are made intentionally hard. For tablets meant for immediate release, they are intentionally made soft. Tablets should be sufficiently hard to resist breaking during normal handling and soft enough to disintegrate properly after swallowing.
  • 12.
    APPARATUS 1- MONSANTOHARDNESS TESTER This apparatus has a spring, screw knob, and a graduated scale. The reading on the graduated scale is adjusted to zero. The tablet to be tested is placed between the anvil and spindle . The screw knob moves forward until the tablet breaks. Note down the reading on the graduated scale, which indicates the force required to break the tablet. The force is measured in kilograms.
  • 13.
  • 14.
    APPARATUS I1- PFIZERTESTER The tablet to be tested is placed between the jaws of the apparatus. The reading on the pressure dial is adjusted to zero. Then the press the plier like handle with hands. Reading on the pressure dial is noted which indicates the force required in kilogram or pound – which is the force required to break the tablets.
  • 15.
  • 16.
    FRIABILITY TEST Done tocheck the ability of a tablet to break into smaller pieces under pressure, mechanical shock, or stress during handling and transportation. Strength of the tablet plays an important role in the dissolution and disintegration of the tablet. After the friability test, tablets are inspected for breakage and the percentage of tablet mass lost through chipping.
  • 17.
    APPARATUS – ROCHEFRIABILATOR Consists of a drum or plastic chamber having diameter 283-291mm and a depth of 36-40mm. Rotation speed of drum is 25rpm. Carefully weigh 20 tablets and place them in a plastic chamber and rotate it for 4 minutes or set 100 number of rotations. During each revolution, tablets fall from a distance of about 6 inches. After 100 revolutions or 4 minutes, remove the tablets from the chamber. Dust the tablets and reweigh the tablets. Percentage weight loss is calculated. If there is a loss in weight, this indicates friability. Loss of 0.5-1% of the weight is considered acceptable.
  • 19.
    WEIGHT VARIATION TEST 20tablets are randomly selected and weighed individually. Average weight of the 20 tablets are also calculated. Individual weight is compared with the average weight. Not more than the individual weight of two tablets may deviate from the average weight, by more than the percentage deviation. AVERAGE WEIGHT PERCENTAGE 80mg or less 10 8-250mg 7.5 250mg or more 5
  • 20.
    CONTENT UNIFORMITY TEST Accordingto United States Pharmacopoeia, 10 tablets are assayed individually. Out of this, 9 tablets should not contain less than 85% or more than 115% of the labelled drug content. 10th tablet should not contain less than 75% or more than 125% of the labelled drug content.
  • 21.
    ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL PERCENTAGE TEST Percentageof medicament or active pharmaceutical ingredient, are calculated by taking sample of tablets and then assay is carried out. Result of the tablets should be within the prescribed percentage limit in pharmacopoeia.
  • 22.
    DISINTEGRATION TEST Generally, whena drug is taken, it should be readily available to the body. First important step of a tablet to be readily available :- breakdown of the tablet into smaller particles or granules – process is called Disintegration. Time taken for a tablet to disintegrate is measured in a device described in the USP. Disintegration is mainly used as a guide for the formulator in preparing an optimum tablet formulation.
  • 23.
    APPARATUS – DISINTEGRATION APPARATUS TheUSP device for disintegration comprises – 6 glass tubes that are 3 inches long, open at the top, and closed at the bottom with a 10 mesh screen in the basket rack assembly. One tablet is placed in each tube and a perforated plastic disc is placed over the tablet. The basket rack is positioned in a 1litre beaker of water or simulated gastric fluid or intestinal fluid, at 37℃. The assembly moves up and down at a specified rate using the help of a standard motor driven device. Time taken to disintegrate the tablets, and all particles must pass through the 10 mesh screen in the standard time.
  • 26.
    Uncoated tablets :-water is used a disintegration medium, and all 6 tablets should disintegrate within 15 minutes. Sugar Coated tablets :- all tablets should disintegrate within 1 hour. If a tablet does not pass the test, the disintegration medium is changed from water to 0.1M HCl, and the test is repeated. Failure in this, will lead to rejection of the whole batch. Film coated tablets :- tablets should disintegrate in 30 minutes. Enteric coated tablets :- test is carried out for 2 hours first in 0.1 M HCl, and the tablets should not disintegrate. Then the tablets are tested with a simulated intestinal fluid for the next hour.
  • 27.
    DISSOLUTION TEST Dissolution testis carried out to :- Show that the drug is released up to 100%. Show that the drug release is uniform batch to batch. There are different types of dissolution apparatus according to the United States Pharmacopoeia.
  • 28.
    In general, dissolutionapparatus consists of a cylindrical flask with a hemispherical bottom, made of glass or transparent plastic having 1000ml volume capacity. Flask is partially immersed in a temperature bath maintained at 37℃. Flask is fitted with a cover having 4 holes – one hole for the shaft with a basket or paddle, second for thermometer, and other holes for sampling. Other end of the shaft is attached to variable speed driven motor that rotates at 25-150 rpm. Dissolution test is first conducted with 6 tablets, if a failure occurs the test is repeated with 6 tablets. On failure again, the test is repeated with 12 tablets.
  • 29.
    APPARATUS I –ROTATING BASKET TYPE A cylindrical basket is placed at the end of the shaft, constructing with a non reactive mesh. Tablet is placed in the basket, and the pores in the mesh allow the dissolving drug to move from the basket to the holding flask. Start motor and seed is adjusted to 100 rom. At a specified time interval, sample is withdrawn and the same volume of dissolution medium is replaced. Samples are tested by UV spectroscopy, or chromatography.
  • 31.
    APPARATUS II –PADDLE TYPE Rotating shaft is fixed to a blade attached vertically at the end. The blade is meant to act as a stirrer to ix the drug being tested with the liquid. Drug is placed in the flask. Start motor and seed is adjusted to 100 rom. At a specified time interval, sample is withdrawn and the same volume of dissolution medium is replaced. Samples are tested by UV spectroscopy, or chromatography.
  • 33.
    PERCENTAGE OF WEIGHTGAIN IN COATED TABLETS Difference in weight of the final product and the initial uncoated tablet is calculated and the percentage is noted and checked according to the standard values in the pharmacopoeia.
  • 34.
    THICKNESS OF FILMIN COATED TABLETS Difference in the thickness of the coated tablet and uncoated tablet is measured using a micrometer or sliding caliper scale. Note the value is noted and checked according to the standard values in the pharmacopoeia.