Pedagogy in Public: Open Education Unbound
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
2 likes•1,821 views
The document discusses the benefits of open education and open educational resources (OER). It notes that textbook costs have risen significantly and that many students do not purchase required textbooks or take fewer courses due to high costs. Openly licensed educational content can help address these issues by providing free, collaborative, and customizable learning materials. The document advocates for open pedagogy, which treats education as a learner-driven process and connects universities to the wider public. Open access to research is also discussed as a way to fulfill the promise of disseminating scholarship widely in the digital age. Challenges to open practices, like barriers to access and power dynamics, are acknowledged and addressing these issues is presented as an important part of advancing open education
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (20)
Similar to Pedagogy in Public: Open Education Unbound
Similar to Pedagogy in Public: Open Education Unbound (20)
More from Robin DeRosa
More from Robin DeRosa (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Pedagogy in Public: Open Education Unbound
- 1. Pedagogy in Public: Open Education Unbound Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Robin DeRosa @actualham Tweet along at #OpenUnbound
- 2. It’s a Gateway Drug
- 3. Cable Green, Creative Commons THE KEYNOTE
- 4. • Student textbooks cost about $1,200 per year. • Students worry more about paying for books than they worry about paying for college. • Textbook costs have risen 812% since 1978. • $1,200 is equal to 12% of tuition at my university. Image: CCBY Georgie Pauwels https://flic.kr/p/igHaNo
- 5. Effects of Textbook Prices • 60% of students report not purchasing a required textbook because of cost, and 23% regularly go without books due to cost • 50% of students report taking fewer courses due to textbook costs • 14% have dropped a course and 10% have withdrawn from a course due to textbook costs 2012 Survey of 22,000 students, Florida Virtual Campus, comprised of the 12 universities and 28 colleges in the Florida state system. CCBYDagnyMolflic.kr/p/5ksCNP
- 6. Reuse Revise Remix Redistribute Retain CCBYSA Breno Trautwein https://flic.kr/p/cAxDUs
- 9. Square 1: Openly-Licensed Content (Public Domain Lit Shouldn’t Cost $87)
- 10. Collaboratively Built: Alums, Incoming Students, Professor
- 13. Interactive and Public Annotation
- 14. Even “the most boring book ever written” is interactive. But textbooks? Ugh.
- 15. An Open “Textbook” Can Be: • Interactive • Collaborative • Dialogic • Dynamic • Empowering • Contributory • Current • Accessible • Multimedia • Public • (Free)
- 16. Open Education • Open Educational Resources (OER) • Open Pedagogy • Open Access to research
- 17. Open Pedagogy • Improves access to education. • Treats education as a learner-driven process. • Stresses community and collaboration over content. • Connects the university to the wider public.
- 18. Access • Save money on textbooks, ok • But what other barriers exist to access? • Digital divide • Universal design • Trolling, violence CCBY Jonathan Brodsky https://flic.kr/p/37z2C2
- 19. Learner- Driven • Learning Outcomes • Policies • Texts • Assignments • Feedback & Grading
- 20. CC not C • Course hashtags (#opencomp) • Group projects • OpenLabs
- 21. Public Blogs, PLNs, ePorts • @gardnercampbell • @anrikard • @audreywatters CCBYSA JusinC http://bit.ly/1W18JBe
- 22. Personal Reflective Portfolio Portal for sharing and collaborating
- 23. What is the Internet FOR, Anyway? Pre-Med Sport Performance Art Therapy Music Production Sustainable Food Production International Business Weather Journalism Data Analytics Veterinary Medicine Biomedical Sciences Oh yeah….and English!
- 24. OER Open Pedagogy Open Access How does “open” affect us as SCHOLARS?
- 25. CC BY Cable Green: http://www.slideshare.net/cgreen
- 26. What Will the Digital Age Enable? Technology allows for efficient worldwide dissemination of research and scholarship. But closed distribution models can get in the way. Open access helps to fulfill the promise of the digital age. ~Jennifer Jenkins, Duke University Drawing: CC BY SA http://fav.me/d54zn82
- 27. CC BY 3.0 US: http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm We Can Do It! “We can be confident that OA journals are economically sustainable because the true costs of peer review, manuscript preparation, and OA dissemination are considerably lower than the prices we currently pay for subscription-based journals. There's more than enough money already committed to the journal-support system. Moreover, as OA spreads, libraries will realize large savings from the conversion, cancellation, or demise of non-OA journals.” ~Peter Suber
- 28. We Can Do It!
- 30. call the tweeps
- 32. My evening • Barriers to open • Contingent labor and OER • Privilege and dominance in open spaces • Screenshotting tweets • Embedding tweets • Exploiting tweeters • Slideshares and articles • Conferences • Skype dates • Plans for meetups • Sharing faculty observation protocols • Not • Making • Powerpoint
- 33. OPEN (un)bound(ing) • Challenge barriers to access. Be honest and critical. • Center learners. Be radical and real. • Facilitate connection. Be a sticky node, not a gate. • Share research. Be generous and just. CCBYSAAntonlobohttp://bit.ly/24g4ZjO
- 34. Open is a practice, not a panacea.
- 35. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Robin DeRosa @actualham #OPENunbound
Editor's Notes
- I can show you how to choose a license CC ND is not OER
- Could be an OpenStax book or public docs or whatever
- Content doubling every 13 months
- Gardner – personal cyberinfrastructure, tied to students not courses, lose the LMS Andrew- complexity of fac/student power Audrey- who is data for?
- Not the LMS, not a template, control to the student
- So we save students money while increasing access and value; So we transform our teaching using a critical, open pedagogy; Now what does this mean to us as SCHOLARS?