Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
1
Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse
Chapter 8
Non-conformity, RCA &
reporting an audit
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
What is a Nonconformance?
ISO 9000
“Non-fulfillment of a requirement”
Objective evidence exists showing that:
• a requirement has not been addressed
(intent)
• practice differs from the defined system
(implementation)
• the practice is not effective
(effectiveness)
2
Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
3
Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse
Communicating Findings of Nonconformance
 D o not view nonconformance in a negative
way. This is NOT like a traffic ticket. It is NOT a
punishment.
Uncovering nonconformance presents
a previously undiscovered opportunity
for improvement.
 B e positive, be professional, be precise.
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
4
Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse
Nonconformity Report
 N o set rules; however all have these two parts:
• The requirement (what was supposed to be)
• The evidence (what actually is)
Different organizations have different formats
• Use the format chosen by your client or firm
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
A Nonconformance Must Also Be...
Factual
Precise
Objective
Traceable
Concise
Will someone else be able to trace back and find the
same evidence you found, based on what you wrote?
5
Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
Major Nonconformance Definition
• A failure of the clients system to address a specified
requirement of the standard.
• A frequent or purposeful failure to follow specified
requirement written within the organization system.
• A failure to achieve the fundamental aim of a system
requirement.
• A failure to achieve legal or statutory requirements.
• Multiple minor nonconformities within the same
requirement of the standard or organization system.
• A purposeful failure of the organization to correct
nonconformities.
6
Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
7
Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse
Major Nonconformance Definition
Directly related to significant aspect.
Failure to meet legislative requirements or
to report a legal non-compliance.
Failure to meet improvement criteria
towards objectives and targets without
identifying.
Failure to identify an environmental aspect.
Failure to correctly evaluate significance
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
What is a Minor Nonconformance?
• Minor indicates the issue is not significant
• The system is not threatened
• “Noise in the system”
• Isolated instance where a requirement has not been fulfilled
• If it is not a MAJOR NC then it is a Minor NC.
Only 21
minor NCR!
8
Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
9
Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse
Examples of Objective Evidence
 Factual evidence of differences between the
Environmental Manual and associated procedures
 Factual evidence of differences between procedures
and working practices
 Lack of evidence to support implementation of
various standard clauses
 Lack of evidence to show continuous
implementation of various parts of the system
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
10
Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse
Scenario:
Engineering department,
Acetylene gas delivered but left in unsecuredarea.
 W I 9-01, clause 3, requires that on delivery all
flammable gases must be immediately stored in
secure storage area.
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITS Incident Number
…....................
NONCONFORMITY REPORT
Organizationy under Audit: XYZplc
.............................
Note NumberSW/01
Area under review:
……………………………………….
I
S
(
O
X
1
X
4
X
0
0
X
1Clause Number
…………………………
Category MAJOR* MINOR* * delete one
Deficiency
Evidence was available that ACETYLENE
GAS was left in a non-secure area
Refer to WI 9-01, clause 3
Auditor Richard Simon
11
Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse
•Area
•Problem
•Attribution
•Grading
•Reference to internal
Requirement(s), if
necessary
•Sign
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
A word of Caution
 B e cautious, do not not be
over conclusive!
 D o n ’ t judge on facevalue!
 M a k e sure you have completeevidence!
 M a k e sure your evidence isobjective!
 W h e n in doubt, investigate!
Identify the leads for furtherinvestigation.
12
Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
13
Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse
Company: Audit Date:
STANDARD REFERENCE or
ENVIRONMENTALMANUAL
REFERENCE or
SUBJECT REFERENCE
Departments
T
o
t
a
l
TOTALS
FINALTOTALS MAJOR MINOR
COMMENTS
NAME SIGNED DATE:
Matrix or cluster
analysis
 Is the system
fundamentally sound?
 Are there any problem
areas?
 Are there weak
elements in the
system?
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
Corrective Action
“Action to eliminate the
cause of a detected
nonconformity or other
undesirable situation”
Same as ISO 9000
Don’t cure symptoms only!
Hit the cause!
Effective Corrective/RiskAction
Preventive Action
“Action to eliminate the
cause of a potential
nonconformity”
14
Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
Auditor Auditee
Prepare NCR
Review
effectiveness
Explain Cause/Propose
Corrective Action
Agreement
Prepare NCR
Acknowledge
& investigate
Identify, note
& communicate Agreement
Implement,
verify & notify
15
Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
Corrective Action Request
Company: Date: NCR
Number:
Auditor: Auditee:
Standard & Clause Major: Minor
Auditors Report: of non-conformance (requirement & evidence)
Signed:
Date:
Cause & Proposed Corrective Action:
Proposed Completion Date:
Date: Signature
Corrective Action Review:
Signed:
Date:
16
Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse
Example:
Non-conformance and
Corrective Action
Request Form
Note area for corrective
action review. What
should be entered here?
By who?
17
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
REPORTING NON CONFORMITIES
Non conformity reports should include:
 Date of audit
 Site/area/location
 Auditors signature
 Audi tees acceptance signature
 Details of the deficiency
IQATRAINING
17
18
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
EXAMPLE OF CAR FORM
IQATRAINING
18
FOR TRAINING PURPOSES ONLY MMC/INTAS
Corrective Action Request (CAR)
organization: Audit date: CAR Number:
Department: Process:
Auditor: Auditee:
Standard: Major: Minor:
Clause:
Nonconformity report:
Signed: Date:
Root cause analysis:
Proposed Corrective Action's):
Proposed Completion Date:
Signed: Actual Completion Date:
Corrective Action Review (state effectiveness of action)
Signed: Date:
Management Review Meeting comment's)
Date:
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8 CAUTION!!
 Be cautious, do not be over conclusive!
 Don’t judge on face value!
 Make sure you have
complete evidence!
 Make sure your evidence
is objective!
 When in doubt, investigate!
 Identify the leads for further investigation
IQATRAINING
19 19
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
Observation/Area of Improvement
 An observation is essentially an OPINION.
20
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
What is root cause analysis?
 a class of problem solving methods aimed a
t
identifying the root causes of problems or
events
21
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
nd all the factors that have impa
Root cause methods : ISHIKAWA
 are causal diagrams that show the causes ofa
specific event
 an analyzing instrument which helps to identify, or
de
r
and print possible causes of a specific problem or a
quality characteristic
 graphical representation of the relation between a
result a ct
22
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
Root cause methods : ISHIKAWA
Example
23
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
Root cause methods : 5 Why
 The 5 Whys is a question-asking technique
used to explore the cause-and-effect
relationships underlying a particular
problem
24
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
25
Root cause methods : 5 Why
 The vehicle will not start. (the problem)
• Why? - The battery is dead. (first why)
• Why? - The alternator is not functioning. (second why)
• Why? - The alternator belt has broken. (third why)
• Why? - The alternator belt was well beyond its useful service
life and not replaced. (fourth why)
• Why? - The vehicle was not maintained according to the
recommended service schedule. (fifth why, a root cause)
• Why? - Replacement parts are not available because of the
extreme age of the vehicle. (sixth why, optional footnote)
 Start maintaining the vehicle according to the recommended service
schedule. (possible 5th Why solution)
 Purchase a different vehicle that is maintainable. (possible 6th W
h
y
solution)
Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis
8
Group exercise – nonconformity
26

Non-conformity, RCA & reporting an audit

  • 1.
    Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 1 Issue:01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse Chapter 8 Non-conformity, RCA & reporting an audit
  • 2.
    Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 Whatis a Nonconformance? ISO 9000 “Non-fulfillment of a requirement” Objective evidence exists showing that: • a requirement has not been addressed (intent) • practice differs from the defined system (implementation) • the practice is not effective (effectiveness) 2 Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse
  • 3.
    Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 3 Issue:01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse Communicating Findings of Nonconformance  D o not view nonconformance in a negative way. This is NOT like a traffic ticket. It is NOT a punishment. Uncovering nonconformance presents a previously undiscovered opportunity for improvement.  B e positive, be professional, be precise.
  • 4.
    Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 4 Issue:01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse Nonconformity Report  N o set rules; however all have these two parts: • The requirement (what was supposed to be) • The evidence (what actually is) Different organizations have different formats • Use the format chosen by your client or firm
  • 5.
    Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 ANonconformance Must Also Be... Factual Precise Objective Traceable Concise Will someone else be able to trace back and find the same evidence you found, based on what you wrote? 5 Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse
  • 6.
    Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 MajorNonconformance Definition • A failure of the clients system to address a specified requirement of the standard. • A frequent or purposeful failure to follow specified requirement written within the organization system. • A failure to achieve the fundamental aim of a system requirement. • A failure to achieve legal or statutory requirements. • Multiple minor nonconformities within the same requirement of the standard or organization system. • A purposeful failure of the organization to correct nonconformities. 6 Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse
  • 7.
    Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 7 Issue:01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse Major Nonconformance Definition Directly related to significant aspect. Failure to meet legislative requirements or to report a legal non-compliance. Failure to meet improvement criteria towards objectives and targets without identifying. Failure to identify an environmental aspect. Failure to correctly evaluate significance
  • 8.
    Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 Whatis a Minor Nonconformance? • Minor indicates the issue is not significant • The system is not threatened • “Noise in the system” • Isolated instance where a requirement has not been fulfilled • If it is not a MAJOR NC then it is a Minor NC. Only 21 minor NCR! 8 Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse
  • 9.
    Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 9 Issue:01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse Examples of Objective Evidence  Factual evidence of differences between the Environmental Manual and associated procedures  Factual evidence of differences between procedures and working practices  Lack of evidence to support implementation of various standard clauses  Lack of evidence to show continuous implementation of various parts of the system
  • 10.
    Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 10 Issue:01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse Scenario: Engineering department, Acetylene gas delivered but left in unsecuredarea.  W I 9-01, clause 3, requires that on delivery all flammable gases must be immediately stored in secure storage area.
  • 11.
    Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 ENVIRONMENTALAUDITS Incident Number ….................... NONCONFORMITY REPORT Organizationy under Audit: XYZplc ............................. Note NumberSW/01 Area under review: ………………………………………. I S ( O X 1 X 4 X 0 0 X 1Clause Number ………………………… Category MAJOR* MINOR* * delete one Deficiency Evidence was available that ACETYLENE GAS was left in a non-secure area Refer to WI 9-01, clause 3 Auditor Richard Simon 11 Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse •Area •Problem •Attribution •Grading •Reference to internal Requirement(s), if necessary •Sign
  • 12.
    Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 Aword of Caution  B e cautious, do not not be over conclusive!  D o n ’ t judge on facevalue!  M a k e sure you have completeevidence!  M a k e sure your evidence isobjective!  W h e n in doubt, investigate! Identify the leads for furtherinvestigation. 12 Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse
  • 13.
    Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 13 Issue:01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse Company: Audit Date: STANDARD REFERENCE or ENVIRONMENTALMANUAL REFERENCE or SUBJECT REFERENCE Departments T o t a l TOTALS FINALTOTALS MAJOR MINOR COMMENTS NAME SIGNED DATE: Matrix or cluster analysis  Is the system fundamentally sound?  Are there any problem areas?  Are there weak elements in the system?
  • 14.
    Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 CorrectiveAction “Action to eliminate the cause of a detected nonconformity or other undesirable situation” Same as ISO 9000 Don’t cure symptoms only! Hit the cause! Effective Corrective/RiskAction Preventive Action “Action to eliminate the cause of a potential nonconformity” 14 Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse
  • 15.
    Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 AuditorAuditee Prepare NCR Review effectiveness Explain Cause/Propose Corrective Action Agreement Prepare NCR Acknowledge & investigate Identify, note & communicate Agreement Implement, verify & notify 15 Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse
  • 16.
    Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 CorrectiveAction Request Company: Date: NCR Number: Auditor: Auditee: Standard & Clause Major: Minor Auditors Report: of non-conformance (requirement & evidence) Signed: Date: Cause & Proposed Corrective Action: Proposed Completion Date: Date: Signature Corrective Action Review: Signed: Date: 16 Issue: 01.01. 2010 MMC/INTAS- EMS Internal Auditor TrainingCourse Example: Non-conformance and Corrective Action Request Form Note area for corrective action review. What should be entered here? By who?
  • 17.
    17 Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 REPORTINGNON CONFORMITIES Non conformity reports should include:  Date of audit  Site/area/location  Auditors signature  Audi tees acceptance signature  Details of the deficiency IQATRAINING 17
  • 18.
    18 Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 EXAMPLEOF CAR FORM IQATRAINING 18 FOR TRAINING PURPOSES ONLY MMC/INTAS Corrective Action Request (CAR) organization: Audit date: CAR Number: Department: Process: Auditor: Auditee: Standard: Major: Minor: Clause: Nonconformity report: Signed: Date: Root cause analysis: Proposed Corrective Action's): Proposed Completion Date: Signed: Actual Completion Date: Corrective Action Review (state effectiveness of action) Signed: Date: Management Review Meeting comment's) Date:
  • 19.
    Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8CAUTION!!  Be cautious, do not be over conclusive!  Don’t judge on face value!  Make sure you have complete evidence!  Make sure your evidence is objective!  When in doubt, investigate!  Identify the leads for further investigation IQATRAINING 19 19
  • 20.
    Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 Observation/Areaof Improvement  An observation is essentially an OPINION. 20
  • 21.
    Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 Whatis root cause analysis?  a class of problem solving methods aimed a t identifying the root causes of problems or events 21
  • 22.
    Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 ndall the factors that have impa Root cause methods : ISHIKAWA  are causal diagrams that show the causes ofa specific event  an analyzing instrument which helps to identify, or de r and print possible causes of a specific problem or a quality characteristic  graphical representation of the relation between a result a ct 22
  • 23.
    Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 Rootcause methods : ISHIKAWA Example 23
  • 24.
    Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 Rootcause methods : 5 Why  The 5 Whys is a question-asking technique used to explore the cause-and-effect relationships underlying a particular problem 24
  • 25.
    Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 25 Rootcause methods : 5 Why  The vehicle will not start. (the problem) • Why? - The battery is dead. (first why) • Why? - The alternator is not functioning. (second why) • Why? - The alternator belt has broken. (third why) • Why? - The alternator belt was well beyond its useful service life and not replaced. (fourth why) • Why? - The vehicle was not maintained according to the recommended service schedule. (fifth why, a root cause) • Why? - Replacement parts are not available because of the extreme age of the vehicle. (sixth why, optional footnote)  Start maintaining the vehicle according to the recommended service schedule. (possible 5th Why solution)  Purchase a different vehicle that is maintainable. (possible 6th W h y solution)
  • 26.
    Non-Conformity and CauseAnalysis 8 Groupexercise – nonconformity 26