AWARENESS TRAINING PROGRAM ON PROBLEM SOLVING BY ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
Name: AJIT D BHOSALE
Designation: SR.GENERAL MANAGER – QUALITY AND SYSTEMS
Date: 31.10.2014
REFERENCE CLAUSES FROM ISO 9001:2008
CLAUSES FROM ISO 9001:2008
8.4 Analysis of data
The organization shall determine, collect and analyse appropriate data
to demonstrate the suitability and effectiveness of the quality
management system and to evaluate where continual improvement of
the effectiveness of the quality management system can be made. This
shall include data generated as a result of monitoring and measurement
and from other relevant sources.
The analysis of data shall provide information relating to
a) customer satisfaction.
b) conformity to product requirements.
c) characteristics and trends of processes and products, including
opportunities for preventive action and
d) Suppliers
SUB
HEADING
Analysis of Data
EMHS Data for Analysis:
• Customer Feedbacks (CSI)
• Customer Complaints
• Crane Stoppages (Lean)
• Design Concession Requests
• Plant Machinery Breakdowns
• Customer NC’s during inspection at our works
• NC’s raised during ISO 9K Internal Audits
• NC’s raised during Site Audits
• NC’s raised during internal inspection of Cranes
• Supplier Rejections
• Customer Order Loss
• Accidents, Near Miss Accidents,
• Sale Meet Minutes, Service Meet Minutes, KRA/KPI Review Meet Minutes,
etc
SUB
HEADING
Clauses from ISO 9001:2008
8.5.2 Corrective action
The organization shall take action to eliminate the causes of
nonconformities in order to prevent recurrence. Corrective actions
shall be appropriate to the effects of the nonconformities
encountered.
A documented procedure shall be established to define requirements
for
a) reviewing nonconformities (including customer complaints),
b) determining the causes of nonconformities,
c) evaluating the need for action to ensure that nonconformities do
not recur,
d) determining and implementing action needed,
e) records of the results of action taken and
f) reviewing the effectiveness of the corrective action taken
SUB
HEADING
Clauses from ISO 9001:2008
8.5.3 Preventive action
The organization shall determine action to eliminate the causes of potential
nonconformities in order to prevent their occurrence. Preventive actions
shall be appropriate to the effects of the potential problems.
A documented procedure shall be established to define requirements for
a) determining potential nonconformities and their causes,
b) evaluating the need for action to prevent occurrence of
nonconformities,
c) determining and implementing action needed,
d) records of results of action taken and
e) reviewing the effectiveness of the preventive action taken.
Tools for Preventive Actions are – PFMEA (Process Failure Modes & Effect
Analysis), DFMEA (Design Failure Modes & Effect Analysis), etc
SUB
HEADING
INTRODUCTION TO ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION
SUB
HEADING
In any organization numerous problems exist in all facets of its
activities. The efficiency and survival of the organization depends
on how promptly these problems are recognized and their root
causes are isolated and eliminated.
A systematic analysis of each potential problem area should be
Carried out to recognize the root causes which are responsible for
creating the problem.
Such analysis is called as Root Cause Analysis.
INTRODUCTION
SUB
HEADING
A root cause is a cause that once removed from the problem
prevents the final undesirable event from occurring or recurring.
Why Determine Root Cause?
• Prevent problems from occurring / recurring
• Reduce possible injury to personnel
• Reduce rework and scrap
• Increase competitiveness
• Promote happy customers and stockholders
• Ultimately, reduce cost and save money
SUB
HEADING
Follows a specific set of steps:
• Define the problem
• Collect data
• Identify possible factors
• Identify root cause(s)
• Identify & Implement solutions
• Verify the effectiveness of the
implemented solutions
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS STEPS
SUB
HEADING
DEFINE THE PROBLEM:
• What happened?
• When did it happen?
• Where did it happen?
• What was the impact?
STEP 1
SUB
HEADING
COLLECT DATA:
•What proof do you have that the problem
exists?
•How long has the problem existed?
•What is the impact of the problem?
STEP 2
SUB
HEADING
Cause and effect diagram (also known as
Ishikawa diagram or fishbone diagram) is an
analysis tool to analyze many potential or
actual causes of a problem in a systematic way.
It is a very effective way of improving the
quality of the product or service.
STEP 3&4: IDENTIFY THE POSSIBLE FACTORS & ROOT CAUSE
(TECHNIQUE NO.- 1)
SUB
HEADING
ISHIKAWA DIAGRAM / FISH BONE DIAGRAM
Material Environment
Men Measurement
Machine
Quality
Assemblies
Components
Suppliers
Consumables
Procedures
Policies
Accounting
Noise level
Humidity
Temperature
Lighting
Training
Experience
Skill
Attitude
Variability
Tooling
Fixtures
Technology
Instruments
Gauging
Counting
Tests
Major and Subsidiary Causes
EXAMPLES:
SUB
HEADING
Machine factors
• Inadequate process capability
• Incorrectly designed
• Worn components
• Poor maintenance
• Equipment effected by environmental factors such as
heat, humidity etc.
Material factors
• Use of untested materials or wrong selection of material
• Substandard material accepted on concession
because of non-availability of correct material
• Inconsistency in specifications on the part of vendors
EXAMPLES:
SUB
HEADING
Men factors
• Incorrect knowledge of doing settings, assembly, etc
• Careless operator and inadequate supervision
• Undue rush by the operator to achieve quality targets
• Lack of understanding of drawing instructions relating
to a process
• Operator does not posses requisite skill for handling
the equipment
Method factors
• Inadequate process controls
• Non availability of proper test equipments
• Test equipment out of calibration
• Vague inspection/ testing instructions
• Inspectors do not possess the necessary skill
• Methods / Work Instructions not defined
SUB
HEADING
ASK WHY 5 TIMES:
5 whys – Ask “why” until you get to the root of the problem
Very often, the answer to the first "why" will prompt another
"why" and the answer to the second "why" will prompt
another and so on; hence the name the 5 Whys strategy.
Benefits of the 5 Whys include:
• It helps to quickly determine the root cause of a problem
• It is easy to learn and apply
STEP 3&4: IDENTIFY THE POSSIBLE FACTORS & ROOT CAUSE
(TECHNIQUE NO.- 2)
SUB
HEADING
• For better effectiveness
• Ease of Implementation
• Return on Investment
(not always applicable especially with Safety
Incidents)
• Prevent Potential Negative Effects –
solution shall not cause other problems
Evaluate Solutions before you implement them
IDENTIFY THE SOLUTIONS:
SUB
HEADING
TYPES OF SOLUTIONS
5
What can be done to prevent the problem
from happening again?
Two types of solutions:
1. Corrective – reactive, the problem has
already occurred
2. Preventative – proactive, problem has not
happened yet
All the solutions shall be recorded.
SUB
HEADING
This is essentially the action plan -
• How will the solution be implemented?
• Who is responsible for the solution?
• Target dates for completion
Action plan to reviewed periodically for timely
implementation of solutions.
IMPLEMENTATION OF SOLUTIONS
SUB
HEADING
• It is not verification of implementation.
• It is the verification of the effectiveness of
the actions taken.
• Poor results found in effectiveness
verification often indicate - wrong Root
Cause or wrong Corrective / Preventive
Action(s).
• Consider performing audits as a
verification tool.
VERIFICATION OF EFFECTIVENESS
SUB
HEADING
• Closure can only happen after successful
verification of Corrective / Preventive
Actions
• By nature, effective Corrective / Preventive
Actions will prevent recurrence / occurrence
• If Corrective / Preventive Actions are found
to be not effective, then Root Cause Analysis
should be repeated.
• Record the date of closure.
CLOSURE OF SOLUTIONS IMPLEMENTED
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

Root Cause Analysis technique for industry.pptx

  • 1.
    AWARENESS TRAINING PROGRAMON PROBLEM SOLVING BY ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS Name: AJIT D BHOSALE Designation: SR.GENERAL MANAGER – QUALITY AND SYSTEMS Date: 31.10.2014
  • 2.
  • 3.
    CLAUSES FROM ISO9001:2008 8.4 Analysis of data The organization shall determine, collect and analyse appropriate data to demonstrate the suitability and effectiveness of the quality management system and to evaluate where continual improvement of the effectiveness of the quality management system can be made. This shall include data generated as a result of monitoring and measurement and from other relevant sources. The analysis of data shall provide information relating to a) customer satisfaction. b) conformity to product requirements. c) characteristics and trends of processes and products, including opportunities for preventive action and d) Suppliers SUB HEADING
  • 4.
    Analysis of Data EMHSData for Analysis: • Customer Feedbacks (CSI) • Customer Complaints • Crane Stoppages (Lean) • Design Concession Requests • Plant Machinery Breakdowns • Customer NC’s during inspection at our works • NC’s raised during ISO 9K Internal Audits • NC’s raised during Site Audits • NC’s raised during internal inspection of Cranes • Supplier Rejections • Customer Order Loss • Accidents, Near Miss Accidents, • Sale Meet Minutes, Service Meet Minutes, KRA/KPI Review Meet Minutes, etc SUB HEADING
  • 5.
    Clauses from ISO9001:2008 8.5.2 Corrective action The organization shall take action to eliminate the causes of nonconformities in order to prevent recurrence. Corrective actions shall be appropriate to the effects of the nonconformities encountered. A documented procedure shall be established to define requirements for a) reviewing nonconformities (including customer complaints), b) determining the causes of nonconformities, c) evaluating the need for action to ensure that nonconformities do not recur, d) determining and implementing action needed, e) records of the results of action taken and f) reviewing the effectiveness of the corrective action taken SUB HEADING
  • 6.
    Clauses from ISO9001:2008 8.5.3 Preventive action The organization shall determine action to eliminate the causes of potential nonconformities in order to prevent their occurrence. Preventive actions shall be appropriate to the effects of the potential problems. A documented procedure shall be established to define requirements for a) determining potential nonconformities and their causes, b) evaluating the need for action to prevent occurrence of nonconformities, c) determining and implementing action needed, d) records of results of action taken and e) reviewing the effectiveness of the preventive action taken. Tools for Preventive Actions are – PFMEA (Process Failure Modes & Effect Analysis), DFMEA (Design Failure Modes & Effect Analysis), etc SUB HEADING
  • 7.
    INTRODUCTION TO ROOTCAUSE ANALYSIS
  • 8.
    INTRODUCTION SUB HEADING In any organizationnumerous problems exist in all facets of its activities. The efficiency and survival of the organization depends on how promptly these problems are recognized and their root causes are isolated and eliminated. A systematic analysis of each potential problem area should be Carried out to recognize the root causes which are responsible for creating the problem. Such analysis is called as Root Cause Analysis.
  • 9.
    INTRODUCTION SUB HEADING A root causeis a cause that once removed from the problem prevents the final undesirable event from occurring or recurring. Why Determine Root Cause? • Prevent problems from occurring / recurring • Reduce possible injury to personnel • Reduce rework and scrap • Increase competitiveness • Promote happy customers and stockholders • Ultimately, reduce cost and save money
  • 10.
    SUB HEADING Follows a specificset of steps: • Define the problem • Collect data • Identify possible factors • Identify root cause(s) • Identify & Implement solutions • Verify the effectiveness of the implemented solutions ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS STEPS
  • 11.
    SUB HEADING DEFINE THE PROBLEM: •What happened? • When did it happen? • Where did it happen? • What was the impact? STEP 1
  • 12.
    SUB HEADING COLLECT DATA: •What proofdo you have that the problem exists? •How long has the problem existed? •What is the impact of the problem? STEP 2
  • 13.
    SUB HEADING Cause and effectdiagram (also known as Ishikawa diagram or fishbone diagram) is an analysis tool to analyze many potential or actual causes of a problem in a systematic way. It is a very effective way of improving the quality of the product or service. STEP 3&4: IDENTIFY THE POSSIBLE FACTORS & ROOT CAUSE (TECHNIQUE NO.- 1)
  • 14.
    SUB HEADING ISHIKAWA DIAGRAM /FISH BONE DIAGRAM Material Environment Men Measurement Machine Quality Assemblies Components Suppliers Consumables Procedures Policies Accounting Noise level Humidity Temperature Lighting Training Experience Skill Attitude Variability Tooling Fixtures Technology Instruments Gauging Counting Tests Major and Subsidiary Causes
  • 15.
    EXAMPLES: SUB HEADING Machine factors • Inadequateprocess capability • Incorrectly designed • Worn components • Poor maintenance • Equipment effected by environmental factors such as heat, humidity etc. Material factors • Use of untested materials or wrong selection of material • Substandard material accepted on concession because of non-availability of correct material • Inconsistency in specifications on the part of vendors
  • 16.
    EXAMPLES: SUB HEADING Men factors • Incorrectknowledge of doing settings, assembly, etc • Careless operator and inadequate supervision • Undue rush by the operator to achieve quality targets • Lack of understanding of drawing instructions relating to a process • Operator does not posses requisite skill for handling the equipment Method factors • Inadequate process controls • Non availability of proper test equipments • Test equipment out of calibration • Vague inspection/ testing instructions • Inspectors do not possess the necessary skill • Methods / Work Instructions not defined
  • 17.
    SUB HEADING ASK WHY 5TIMES: 5 whys – Ask “why” until you get to the root of the problem Very often, the answer to the first "why" will prompt another "why" and the answer to the second "why" will prompt another and so on; hence the name the 5 Whys strategy. Benefits of the 5 Whys include: • It helps to quickly determine the root cause of a problem • It is easy to learn and apply STEP 3&4: IDENTIFY THE POSSIBLE FACTORS & ROOT CAUSE (TECHNIQUE NO.- 2)
  • 18.
    SUB HEADING • For bettereffectiveness • Ease of Implementation • Return on Investment (not always applicable especially with Safety Incidents) • Prevent Potential Negative Effects – solution shall not cause other problems Evaluate Solutions before you implement them IDENTIFY THE SOLUTIONS:
  • 19.
    SUB HEADING TYPES OF SOLUTIONS 5 Whatcan be done to prevent the problem from happening again? Two types of solutions: 1. Corrective – reactive, the problem has already occurred 2. Preventative – proactive, problem has not happened yet All the solutions shall be recorded.
  • 20.
    SUB HEADING This is essentiallythe action plan - • How will the solution be implemented? • Who is responsible for the solution? • Target dates for completion Action plan to reviewed periodically for timely implementation of solutions. IMPLEMENTATION OF SOLUTIONS
  • 21.
    SUB HEADING • It isnot verification of implementation. • It is the verification of the effectiveness of the actions taken. • Poor results found in effectiveness verification often indicate - wrong Root Cause or wrong Corrective / Preventive Action(s). • Consider performing audits as a verification tool. VERIFICATION OF EFFECTIVENESS
  • 22.
    SUB HEADING • Closure canonly happen after successful verification of Corrective / Preventive Actions • By nature, effective Corrective / Preventive Actions will prevent recurrence / occurrence • If Corrective / Preventive Actions are found to be not effective, then Root Cause Analysis should be repeated. • Record the date of closure. CLOSURE OF SOLUTIONS IMPLEMENTED
  • 23.
    THANK YOU FORYOUR TIME.