In vitro Dissolution
Testing Methods
P.N.Mallikarjun
Associate Professor,
Vignan Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology
Duvvada,Visakhapatnam.A.P.
Definition-

Dissolution: is a process in which a solid
substance solubilizes in a given solvent i.e. mass
transfer from the solid surface to the liquid
phase.
Dissolution Rate: is the amount of drug substance
that goes in solution per unit time under
standardized conditions of liquid/solid interface,
temperature and solvent composition.
SOLUBILITY DISSOLUTION RATE
Absolute solubility is defined
as the maximum amount of
solute dissolved in a given
solvent under standard
conditions of temperature ,
pressure and pH.
Dissolution rate is defined
as the amount of solid
substance that goes into
solution per unit time
under standard
conditions of temperature,
pH, solvent composition
and constant solid surface
area.
It is a static process. It is a dynamic process.
It is a system to differentiate the drugs on the basis of their solubility
and permeability.
The drug substances are classified as:
Class I - High permeability, High solubility. Ex:- Metoprolol.
Class II - High permeability, Low solubility. Ex:- Ezetimibe.
Class III - Low permeability, High solubility. Ex:- Cimetidine.
Class IV-Low permeability,Low solubility.Ex:- Hydrochlorothiazide
 Dissolution and drug release tests are in-vitro tests that measure the
rate and extent of dissolution or release of the drug substance from
a drug product, usually aq.medium under specified conditions.
 It is an important QC procedure for the drug product and linked to
product performance in-vivo.
 NEED FOR DISSOLUTION TESTING:
 Evaluation of bioavailability.
 Batch to batch drug release uniformity.
 Development of more efficacious and therapeutically optical
dosage forms.
 Ensures quality and stability of the product.
 Product development, quality control, research and application.
DISSOLUTION PROCESS OF SOLID DOSAGE FORMS
1. The initial step involves the breaking of a tablet into
granules (disintegration).
2. Some times, these granules further break to yield fine
particles (deaggregation)
3. The next step involves the releasing of the drug into solution
(dissolution)
4. Absorption.
Essential steps in Dissolution of a Tablet
FACTORS RELATING TO THE DISSOLUTION APPARATUS
Design of the container
Size of the container
Shape of the container
Nature of agitation
Speed of agitation
Performance precision of the apparatus
FACTORS RELATING TO THE DISSOLUTION FLUID
1.Volume
2.Temperature
3.Deaeration of dissolution medium
4. pH
5.Composition
IN VITRO DISSOLUTION METHODS
Various classification of Dissolution methods are there
Based on type of system
 1.Basic methods
Based on sink condition
 2.Sink and non sink methods
 3.Official / Compendial methods and
 4.Unofficial/Alternative methods

1.BASIC METHODS
1.Beaker methods(Closed compartment system)
2.flow-through (Open compartment system)
3.Dialysis Method
2.NON SINK SINK
1) NATURAL CONVECTION
 a) Klein solvmeter method
 b)
 c)
Nelson hanging pellet method
Levy static disk method
2) FORCED CONVECTION (NS)
 a) Tumbling method
 b) Levy or Beaker method
 c) Rotating disk method
 d) Particle size method
 e) USP Rotating basket apparatus
 f) USP Paddle apparatus
 a) Wurster pollis adsorption
 b)
 c)
 d)
Partition method
Dialysis method
Rotating disk apparatus
3) FORCED
CONVECTION(SINK)
4) CONTINOUS FLOW:
 a) Pernarowski method
 b) Langenbucher method
 c) Baun and Walker
 d) Tingstad and Reigelman
 e) Modified column apparatus
 f) Takenaka method
3.COMPENDIAL/OFFICIAL METHODS
 Compendial or Official tests are standardised methods
and specification testing for generic pharmaceutical
material and finished products.
 They are utilised as basic requirements needed for
most regulatory submission around the world
I.P U.S.P B.P E.P
TYPE 1 Paddle
apparatus
Basket
apparatus
Basket
apparatus
Basket
apparatus
TYPE 2 Basket
apparatus
Paddle
apparatus
Paddle
apparatus
Paddle
apparatus
TYPE 3 Reciprocating
cylinder
Flow through
cell
Flow through
cell
TYPE 4 Flow through
cell
TYPE 5 Paddleover
disk
TYPE 6 Rotating
cylinder
TYPE 7 Reciprocating
disk
USP.APPARATUS DESCRIPTION ROT.SPEED DOSAGE FORM
TYPE 1 Basket apparatus 50-120 rpm IDR,DR,ER
TYPE 2 Paddle apparatus 25-50 rpm IDR,DR,ER
TYPE 3 Reciprocating
cylinder
6-35 rpm IDR,ER
TYPE 4 Flow through cell N/A ER,Poorlysoluble
API
TYPE 5 Paddle over disk 25-50 rpm TRANSDERMAL
TYPE 6 Rotating cylinder N/A TRANSDERMAL
TYPE 7 Reciprocating
holder
30 rpm ER
APPARATUS-1(ROTATING BASKET)
DESIGN:
 Vessel: -Made of borosilicate glass.
-Semi hemispherical bottom
-Capacity 1000ml
 Shaft : -Stainless steel 316
-Rotates smoothly without
significance wobble(100 rpm)
-Speed regulator
 Water bath:-Maintained at 37±0.5ºC
 USE: Tablets, capsules, delayed release
suppositories, floating dosage forms.
METHOD(Rotating basket):
 Place the stated volume of the dissolution medium(±1 %) in the
vessel and equilibrate dissolution medium to 37±0.5°C.
 Place 1 tablet or capsule in the apparatus ,taking care to exclude air
bubbles from the surface of the dosage form unit and immediately
operate the apparatus at the rate specified(100rpm).
 Withdraw a specimen from a zone midway between the surface of the
dissolution medium and the top of the rotating basket,not less than
1cm from the vessel wall at each times stated.
 Replace the aliquots withdrawn for analysis with equal volumes of
fresh dissolution medium at 37°C.
 Keep the vessel covered for the duration of the test and verify the
temperature of the mixture under test at suitable times.
 Perform the analysis as directed in individual monograph and repeat
the test with additional dosage form units.
Apparatus 1 - Basket
 Advantages
 Full pH change during the test
 Can be easily automated
which is important for routine
investigations.
 Disadvantages
 Basket screen is clogged with
gummy particles.
 Hydrodynamic „dead zone“
under the basket
 Degassing is particularly
important
 Mesh gets corroded by HCl solution.
APPARATUS-2 (ROTATING PADDLE)
 DESIGN:
 Vessel: -Same as basket apparatus
 Shaft: -The blade passes through the shaft so that the bottom of the
blade fuses with bottom of the shaft.
 Stirring elements: -Made of tefflon
For laboratory purpose
-Stainless steel 316
 Water-bath: -Maintains at 37±0.5°C
 Sinkers : -Platinum wire used to prevent
tablet/capsule from floating
METHOD
 It consists of a special coated paddle formed from a blade and a
shaft that minimizes turbulence due to stirring.
 The coated material is inert.
 The paddle is attached vertically to a variable -speed motor that
rotates at a controlled speed.
 The tablet or capsule is placed into a round-bottom dissolution
flask and the apparatus is housed in a constant temperature water
bath maintained at 37°C.
 Most common operating speeds are 50rpm for solid oral dosage
forms and 25 rpm for suspensions.
 A sinker ,such as few turns of platinum wire may be used to
prevent a capsule or tablet from floating
 Used for film coated tablets that stick to the vessel walls or to
help to position tablet/capsule under the paddle.
 Advantages
 Easy to use
 Robust
 pH change possible
 Can be easily automated which is important for
routine investigations
 Disadvantages
 pH/media change is often difficult
 Hydrodynamics are complex, they vary with site of the dosage
form in the vessel (sticking,floating) and therefore may
significantly affect drug dissolution
 Sinkers for floating dosage forms
Paddle apparatus:
Sinker Types:
APPARATUS-3(RECIPROCATING CYLINDER)
 DESIGN:
 Vessel: -Set of cylindrical flat bottom glass vessels
-Set of reciprocating cylinders
-stainless steel fittings(SS316) and
screens made of nonsorbing or
non-reactive materials.
 Agitation type: -Reciprocating
-5-35 rpm
 Volume of dissolution medium:-200-250ml
 Water bath:- Maintain at 37±0.5°C
 USE: Tablets, beads, controlled and
extended release formulations
METHOD(Reciprocating cylinder):
 Place the stated volume of dissolution medium in each vessel of the
apparatus, assemble the apparatus, equilibrate the dissolution
medium to 37±0.5 and remove the thermometer
 Place one dosage form unit in each of the cylinders taking care to
exclude the air bubbles from the surface of each dosage unit and
immediately operate the apparatus as specified in the monograph.
 During the upward and downward stroke, the reciprocating cylinder
moves through a total distance of 9.9 to 10.1cm.
 Within the time interval specified raise the cylinders and withdraw a
portion of the solution under test from a zone midway between the
surface of the dissolution medium and bottom of each vessel.
 Advantages
 Easy to change the pH
 pH-profiles
 Hydrodynamics can be
directly influenced by
varying the dip rate
 Disadvantages
 Small volume (max. 250 ml)
 Little experience
 Limited data
APPARATUS-4 (FLOW THROUGH CELL)
 DESIGN:
 Reservoir : -For dissolution medium
 Pump : -Forces dissolution medium through cell
-Holding a sample
-Flow rate 10-100ml/min or 240-960ml/h
-Laminar flow is maintained
-Peristaltic/centrifugal pumps are not recommended
 Water bath:- Maintain at 37±0.5°C
 USE:
Low solubility drugs ,micro particulates ,implants, suppositories
controlled release formulations
METHOD(Flow through cell):
 The flow through cell is transparent & inert mountedvertically
with filters.
 Standard cell diameters are 12 & 22.6 mm.
 The bottom cone usually filled with glass beads of 1 mm
diameter.
 Tablet holder used for positioning special dosage form e.g. inlay
tablets.
 Place the glass beads into the cell as specified in the monograph.
 Place one dosage unit on top of the beads or on a wire carrier.
 Assemble the filter head and fix the parts together by means of a
suitable clamping device.
 Introduce by the pump of the dissolution medium warmed to
37±0.5 through the bottom of the cell to obtain the flow rate
specified and measured with an accuracy of 5%.
 Collect the eluate by fractions at each of the times stated.
d.
 Advantages
 easy to change media pH
 pH-profile possible
 Sink conditions maintaine
 different modes
a) open system
b) closed system
 Disadvantages
 Deaeration necessary
 high volumes of media
 labor intensive
Cell types:
Tablets 22.6 mm Powders / Granules ImplantsTablets 12 mm
Suppositories /
Soft
gelatincapsules
Flow-Through Cell:
APPARATUS-5(PADDLE-OVER-DISK)
 DESIGN:
 Vessel
 Shaft
 Stirring elements- rotating speed 25-50 rpm
 Sample holder:-disk assembly that hold a product in such a way
that release surface is parallel with paddle
-Paddle is directly attached over disk assembly
-Samples are drawn between surface off the medium
and top of the paddle blade
 Volume:900ml
 Temperature:32°C
 USE: Transdermal patches, ointments, floaters , emulsions.
 Modification: Disk design and volume
 Advantages:
 Easy to handle
 Sink conditions are maintained.
 Membrane effect is minimum.
i.e. drug is placed on a disc at the bottom.
 Disadvantages:
 Disk assembly restricts the patch size
 Borosilicate glass
 17 mesh is standard(others available)
 Accommodates patches up to 90mm.
 This method is used for testing the release of drugs from
transdermal products.
 The apparatus consists of a sample holder or disc assembly that
holds the product.
 The entire preparation is placed in a dissolution flask filledwith
specified medium maintained at 32ºC.
 The paddle is placed directly over the disc assembly.
 The disk assembly holds the system flat and is positioned such that
release surface is placed parallel with the bottom of the paddle
blade. Vessel is covered to minimize evaporation during test.
 Samples are drawn midway between the surface of dissolution
medium and the top of the paddle blade at specified times.
APPARATUS-6( CYLINDER)
 DESIGN:
 Vessel:- In place of basket, cylinder is used.
 Shaft :-Stainless steel 316
 Sample :- Mounted to cuprophan (inner porous cellulosic material)
an entire system adheres to cylinder.
- Dosage unit is placed in cylinder and release from side out.
 Water-bath: maintained at 32±0.5°C
 USE:
 Transdermal patches cannot be cut into small size.
 Solid dosage forms, pH profile , small volumes
 METHOD( cylinder):
 Use the assembly from apparatus 1 except to replace the basket and
shaft with a stainless steel cylinder stirring element.
 The temperature is maintained at 32±0.5°C.
 The dosage unit is placed on the cylinder with side out .
 The dosage unit is placed to the exterior of the cylinder such that
long axis of the system fits around the circumference of the cylinder
and removes trapped air bubbles.
 Place the cylinder in the apparatus and immediately rotate at the rate
specified in the individual monograph.
 Samples are drawn midway between the surface of the dissolution
medium and the top of the rotating cylinder for analysis.
 cylinder:
 Advantages: -Equipment (apparatus 1)available with the
manufacturers can be used with modification as apparatus 6.
 Disadvantages:-Large volume of medium is required.
-Drug gets diluted & causes difficulties in analysis
-Difficult to clean the cylinder.
APPARATUS-7(RECIPROCATING-DISK)
 DESIGN:
 Vessel:-Flat bottomed cylindrical vessel
-Volume of dissolution medium
 Shaft :
 Sample : -Placed on disk shaped holders
 Agitation :-Reciprocation
-Reciprocating frequency 30
cycle/minute
 Water-bath:-Maintain at 32±0.5°C
 USE:
 Transdermal patches
shaft
disk
dissolution medium
constant temp
water bath
METHOD(Reciprocating disk):
 The assembly consists of a set of volumetrically calibrated solution
containers made of glass or suitable inert material, a motor , a drive
assembly used to reciprocate the system vertically.
 The samples are placed on the disk shaped holders using cuprophan
supports
 The test is carried out at 32°C.
 The reciprocating frequency is 30cycles/min.
 Advantages:-Convenient method for selecting the volume of the
medium.
-sink conditions can be maintained.
-more sensitivity
 Disadvantages: -Investment is high because the design is totally
different from standard equipment already available in industry.
4.ALTERNATIVE METHODS
1.ROTATING/STATIC DISK METHOD
 Developed by late Eino Nelson and described by Levy and Sahli.
 In this method ,the drug is compressed in a non-disintegrating disc
without excipients.
 The disc is mounted in a holder so that only one face of the disc is
exposed to the dissolution medium.
 The holder and disc are immersed in medium and held in a fixed
position as in static disc method and rotated at a given speed in
rotating disc method.
 Samples are collected at predetermined times.
 Surface area of the drug through which dissolution
occurs is kept constant –intrinsic dissolution rate.
2.BEAKER METHOD:
 Reported by Levy and Hayes(1960).
 Dissolution medium, 250ml of 0.1N HCl at 37°C placed
in a 400ml beaker.
 Agitation by three blade polyethylene stirrer,5cm diameterand
rotates at 60 rpm.
 Stirrer immersed to a depth of 2.7 cm in medium and in the center.
 Tablets are placed in a beaker and test was carried out.
 Samples are removed and assayed for the content.
3.FLASK STIRRER METHOD
 Developed by Poole(1969).It includes RBF and a stirring element
similar to that of beaker method.
 RBF used to avoid the formation of moulds of particles in different
positions on the flat bottom of a beaker.
4.PERISTALSIS METHOD:
 To stimulate hydrodynamic condition of GIT tract in an in-vitro
dissolution device.
 It consists of rigid plastic cylindrical tubing fitted with septumand
rubber stopper at both ends.
 Dissolution chamber consists of a space between septum and lower
stopper.
 Dissolution medium is pumped with peristaltic action through the
dosage form.
5.ROTATING BOTTLE METHOD:
 It consists of rotating rack to hold sample drug products in bottles
and they are capped tightly & rotated in 37°C temperaturebath.
 Sample are decanted through a 40 mesh screen and residue are
assayed.
6.DIALYSIS METHOD:
 Cell consist of 32mm inflated membrane.
 Plugged at the lower end by tight fitting cylindrical perspex box.
 Upper end of the tube held by thin perspex ring inserted into the
tube and secured by an elastic band.
 The cell suspended , from the arm of the tablet disintegration
apparatus and containing the dosage form in 150ml of distilled
water at 37°C.
 The cell is raised or lowered 30times a min, into 150ml of distilled
water at same temperature.
 Agitation by slight flexing and stretching of the dialysis membrane
as it enters and leaves the bath. Rotated at 60rpm.
.
7.DIFFUSION CELL
 Static or flow through diffusion cells are used to characterize in-
vitro drug release and drug permeation kinetics from a topical drug
product eg: Ointment, cream or transdermal drug product.
 The Franz diffusion cell is static diffusion system used to
characterize drug permeation through skin model.
 The skin is mounted on the Franz diffusion cell and the drug
product is placed on the skin surface.
 The drug permeates across the skin into a receptor fluid
compartment that may be sampled at various times.
 This system is used for selection of appropriate formulation that
has optimum drug delivery.
Diffusion cell
12/08/12
39
Dissolution Testing methods For some
Drug Delivery Systems
A number of methods are used to conduct in-vitro evaluation
of controlled ocular drug delivery systems.
(a) Bottle method
In this method, dosage forms are placed in the culture
bottles containing phosphate buffer at pH 7.4.
The culture bottles are shaken in a thermostatic water bath
at 37°C.A sample of medium is taken out at appropriate
intervals and analyzed for drug contents.
40
Ocular Drug Delivery Systems
41
b) Modified rotating basket method
In this method, dosage form is placed in a basket
assembly connected to a stirrer.
The assembly is lowered into a jacketed beaker
containing buffer medium.
The temperature of system is maintained at 37°C. A
sample of medium is taken out at appropriate time
 Beaker method
 The dosage form in this method is made to adhere at the bottom of the
beaker containing the medium and stirred uniformly using over head
stirrer.
 Volume of the medium used for the studies varies from 50-500 ml and
the stirrer speed form 60-300 rpm.
 Modified Keshary Chien Cell
 A specialized apparatus was designed in the laboratory.
 It comprised of a Keshary Chien cell containing distilled water (50ml) at
370 c as dissolution medium.
 TMDDS (Trans Membrane Drug Delivery System) was placed in a glass
tube fitted with a 10# sieve at the bottom which reciprocated in the
medium at 30 strokes per min.
 Samples are removed at appropriate time intervals and analyzed for
drug content.
Particulate Drug Delivery systems(MICROSPHERES)
DISSOLUTION ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
 Q –Value
Defined as a percentage of drug content
dissolved in a given time period.
DISSOLUTION ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
STAGE Acceptance criteria
S1
No. of Dosage units
tested
6 No Dosage unit is
less then Q+5%
S2 6 Average Of 12
dosage units (S1+S2)
and no dosage unit is
S3 12(6+6+12=24)
less then Q-15%
Average of 24
dosage units >- And
not more than two
dosage units are less
than Q-15% and No
dosage unit is less46
than Q-25%
COMPARISON OF DISSOLUTION PROFILE
Difference factor (f1 Value)-
Define as calculate the % Difference between 2
curves at each time point and is a measurement of
the relative error between 2 curves.
f1= {[Σ t=1n |Rt-Tt|] / [Σ t=1n Rt]} ×100.
Values range from 0 to 15
47
 Similarity Factor (f2 value)-define as
measurement of similarity in % Dissolution
between two curve.
 Where Rtand Tt= cumulative % dissolved
for reference and test
 Values range from 50(similar) to 100(Identical)
CONCLUSION:
 By studying various factors influencing the rate of dissolution, we
can optimize type of dissolution method and the different
properties of the formulation.
 To predict drug product performance it is essential to select
suitable dissolution method.
 By conducting dissolution studies we can know the batch to batch
reproducibility.
 In vitro Dissolution profile is used to estimate the In vivo behaviour of
the drug product.
 The best available tool to atleast quantitatively assure about the
biological availability of drug from its formulation is its invitro
dissolution.
REFERENCES
 D.M.Brahmankar, Biopharmaceutics and
pharmacokinetics- A Treatise; Vallabh Prakashan,
page no. 20–31.
 Leon Shargel, Applied Biopharmaceutics &
Pharmacokinetics; 4thedition, page no. 132-136.
 The Indian Pharmacist, February 2008,Page
no.10-12
United States Pharmacopoeia – 24, page no.: 1942
– 1951.
“Current perspectives in dissolution testing of
conventional and novel dosage forms”, by Shirazad
Azarmi, Wilson Roa, Raimar Lobenberg, Int. jou.
Of pharmaceutics 328(2007)12 – 21.
Alton’s pharmaceutics “ The design and
manufacturing of medicines”, by Michael E. Alton,
page no.: 21 – 22.

In vitro dissolution testing methods

  • 1.
    In vitro Dissolution TestingMethods P.N.Mallikarjun Associate Professor, Vignan Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology Duvvada,Visakhapatnam.A.P.
  • 2.
    Definition-  Dissolution: is aprocess in which a solid substance solubilizes in a given solvent i.e. mass transfer from the solid surface to the liquid phase. Dissolution Rate: is the amount of drug substance that goes in solution per unit time under standardized conditions of liquid/solid interface, temperature and solvent composition.
  • 3.
    SOLUBILITY DISSOLUTION RATE Absolutesolubility is defined as the maximum amount of solute dissolved in a given solvent under standard conditions of temperature , pressure and pH. Dissolution rate is defined as the amount of solid substance that goes into solution per unit time under standard conditions of temperature, pH, solvent composition and constant solid surface area. It is a static process. It is a dynamic process.
  • 4.
    It is asystem to differentiate the drugs on the basis of their solubility and permeability. The drug substances are classified as: Class I - High permeability, High solubility. Ex:- Metoprolol. Class II - High permeability, Low solubility. Ex:- Ezetimibe. Class III - Low permeability, High solubility. Ex:- Cimetidine. Class IV-Low permeability,Low solubility.Ex:- Hydrochlorothiazide
  • 5.
     Dissolution anddrug release tests are in-vitro tests that measure the rate and extent of dissolution or release of the drug substance from a drug product, usually aq.medium under specified conditions.  It is an important QC procedure for the drug product and linked to product performance in-vivo.  NEED FOR DISSOLUTION TESTING:  Evaluation of bioavailability.  Batch to batch drug release uniformity.  Development of more efficacious and therapeutically optical dosage forms.  Ensures quality and stability of the product.  Product development, quality control, research and application.
  • 6.
    DISSOLUTION PROCESS OFSOLID DOSAGE FORMS
  • 7.
    1. The initialstep involves the breaking of a tablet into granules (disintegration). 2. Some times, these granules further break to yield fine particles (deaggregation) 3. The next step involves the releasing of the drug into solution (dissolution) 4. Absorption. Essential steps in Dissolution of a Tablet
  • 8.
    FACTORS RELATING TOTHE DISSOLUTION APPARATUS Design of the container Size of the container Shape of the container Nature of agitation Speed of agitation Performance precision of the apparatus FACTORS RELATING TO THE DISSOLUTION FLUID 1.Volume 2.Temperature 3.Deaeration of dissolution medium 4. pH 5.Composition
  • 9.
    IN VITRO DISSOLUTIONMETHODS Various classification of Dissolution methods are there Based on type of system  1.Basic methods Based on sink condition  2.Sink and non sink methods  3.Official / Compendial methods and  4.Unofficial/Alternative methods
  • 10.
     1.BASIC METHODS 1.Beaker methods(Closedcompartment system) 2.flow-through (Open compartment system) 3.Dialysis Method
  • 11.
    2.NON SINK SINK 1)NATURAL CONVECTION  a) Klein solvmeter method  b)  c) Nelson hanging pellet method Levy static disk method 2) FORCED CONVECTION (NS)  a) Tumbling method  b) Levy or Beaker method  c) Rotating disk method  d) Particle size method  e) USP Rotating basket apparatus  f) USP Paddle apparatus  a) Wurster pollis adsorption  b)  c)  d) Partition method Dialysis method Rotating disk apparatus 3) FORCED CONVECTION(SINK) 4) CONTINOUS FLOW:  a) Pernarowski method  b) Langenbucher method  c) Baun and Walker  d) Tingstad and Reigelman  e) Modified column apparatus  f) Takenaka method
  • 12.
    3.COMPENDIAL/OFFICIAL METHODS  Compendialor Official tests are standardised methods and specification testing for generic pharmaceutical material and finished products.  They are utilised as basic requirements needed for most regulatory submission around the world
  • 13.
    I.P U.S.P B.PE.P TYPE 1 Paddle apparatus Basket apparatus Basket apparatus Basket apparatus TYPE 2 Basket apparatus Paddle apparatus Paddle apparatus Paddle apparatus TYPE 3 Reciprocating cylinder Flow through cell Flow through cell TYPE 4 Flow through cell TYPE 5 Paddleover disk TYPE 6 Rotating cylinder TYPE 7 Reciprocating disk
  • 14.
    USP.APPARATUS DESCRIPTION ROT.SPEEDDOSAGE FORM TYPE 1 Basket apparatus 50-120 rpm IDR,DR,ER TYPE 2 Paddle apparatus 25-50 rpm IDR,DR,ER TYPE 3 Reciprocating cylinder 6-35 rpm IDR,ER TYPE 4 Flow through cell N/A ER,Poorlysoluble API TYPE 5 Paddle over disk 25-50 rpm TRANSDERMAL TYPE 6 Rotating cylinder N/A TRANSDERMAL TYPE 7 Reciprocating holder 30 rpm ER
  • 15.
    APPARATUS-1(ROTATING BASKET) DESIGN:  Vessel:-Made of borosilicate glass. -Semi hemispherical bottom -Capacity 1000ml  Shaft : -Stainless steel 316 -Rotates smoothly without significance wobble(100 rpm) -Speed regulator  Water bath:-Maintained at 37±0.5ºC  USE: Tablets, capsules, delayed release suppositories, floating dosage forms.
  • 16.
    METHOD(Rotating basket):  Placethe stated volume of the dissolution medium(±1 %) in the vessel and equilibrate dissolution medium to 37±0.5°C.  Place 1 tablet or capsule in the apparatus ,taking care to exclude air bubbles from the surface of the dosage form unit and immediately operate the apparatus at the rate specified(100rpm).  Withdraw a specimen from a zone midway between the surface of the dissolution medium and the top of the rotating basket,not less than 1cm from the vessel wall at each times stated.  Replace the aliquots withdrawn for analysis with equal volumes of fresh dissolution medium at 37°C.  Keep the vessel covered for the duration of the test and verify the temperature of the mixture under test at suitable times.  Perform the analysis as directed in individual monograph and repeat the test with additional dosage form units.
  • 17.
  • 18.
     Advantages  FullpH change during the test  Can be easily automated which is important for routine investigations.  Disadvantages  Basket screen is clogged with gummy particles.  Hydrodynamic „dead zone“ under the basket  Degassing is particularly important  Mesh gets corroded by HCl solution.
  • 19.
    APPARATUS-2 (ROTATING PADDLE) DESIGN:  Vessel: -Same as basket apparatus  Shaft: -The blade passes through the shaft so that the bottom of the blade fuses with bottom of the shaft.  Stirring elements: -Made of tefflon For laboratory purpose -Stainless steel 316  Water-bath: -Maintains at 37±0.5°C  Sinkers : -Platinum wire used to prevent tablet/capsule from floating
  • 20.
    METHOD  It consistsof a special coated paddle formed from a blade and a shaft that minimizes turbulence due to stirring.  The coated material is inert.  The paddle is attached vertically to a variable -speed motor that rotates at a controlled speed.  The tablet or capsule is placed into a round-bottom dissolution flask and the apparatus is housed in a constant temperature water bath maintained at 37°C.  Most common operating speeds are 50rpm for solid oral dosage forms and 25 rpm for suspensions.  A sinker ,such as few turns of platinum wire may be used to prevent a capsule or tablet from floating  Used for film coated tablets that stick to the vessel walls or to help to position tablet/capsule under the paddle.
  • 21.
     Advantages  Easyto use  Robust  pH change possible  Can be easily automated which is important for routine investigations  Disadvantages  pH/media change is often difficult  Hydrodynamics are complex, they vary with site of the dosage form in the vessel (sticking,floating) and therefore may significantly affect drug dissolution  Sinkers for floating dosage forms
  • 22.
  • 24.
  • 25.
    APPARATUS-3(RECIPROCATING CYLINDER)  DESIGN: Vessel: -Set of cylindrical flat bottom glass vessels -Set of reciprocating cylinders -stainless steel fittings(SS316) and screens made of nonsorbing or non-reactive materials.  Agitation type: -Reciprocating -5-35 rpm  Volume of dissolution medium:-200-250ml  Water bath:- Maintain at 37±0.5°C  USE: Tablets, beads, controlled and extended release formulations
  • 26.
    METHOD(Reciprocating cylinder):  Placethe stated volume of dissolution medium in each vessel of the apparatus, assemble the apparatus, equilibrate the dissolution medium to 37±0.5 and remove the thermometer  Place one dosage form unit in each of the cylinders taking care to exclude the air bubbles from the surface of each dosage unit and immediately operate the apparatus as specified in the monograph.  During the upward and downward stroke, the reciprocating cylinder moves through a total distance of 9.9 to 10.1cm.  Within the time interval specified raise the cylinders and withdraw a portion of the solution under test from a zone midway between the surface of the dissolution medium and bottom of each vessel.
  • 27.
     Advantages  Easyto change the pH  pH-profiles  Hydrodynamics can be directly influenced by varying the dip rate  Disadvantages  Small volume (max. 250 ml)  Little experience  Limited data
  • 29.
    APPARATUS-4 (FLOW THROUGHCELL)  DESIGN:  Reservoir : -For dissolution medium  Pump : -Forces dissolution medium through cell -Holding a sample -Flow rate 10-100ml/min or 240-960ml/h -Laminar flow is maintained -Peristaltic/centrifugal pumps are not recommended  Water bath:- Maintain at 37±0.5°C  USE: Low solubility drugs ,micro particulates ,implants, suppositories controlled release formulations
  • 30.
    METHOD(Flow through cell): The flow through cell is transparent & inert mountedvertically with filters.  Standard cell diameters are 12 & 22.6 mm.  The bottom cone usually filled with glass beads of 1 mm diameter.  Tablet holder used for positioning special dosage form e.g. inlay tablets.  Place the glass beads into the cell as specified in the monograph.  Place one dosage unit on top of the beads or on a wire carrier.  Assemble the filter head and fix the parts together by means of a suitable clamping device.  Introduce by the pump of the dissolution medium warmed to 37±0.5 through the bottom of the cell to obtain the flow rate specified and measured with an accuracy of 5%.  Collect the eluate by fractions at each of the times stated.
  • 31.
    d.  Advantages  easyto change media pH  pH-profile possible  Sink conditions maintaine  different modes a) open system b) closed system  Disadvantages  Deaeration necessary  high volumes of media  labor intensive
  • 32.
    Cell types: Tablets 22.6mm Powders / Granules ImplantsTablets 12 mm Suppositories / Soft gelatincapsules
  • 33.
  • 35.
    APPARATUS-5(PADDLE-OVER-DISK)  DESIGN:  Vessel Shaft  Stirring elements- rotating speed 25-50 rpm  Sample holder:-disk assembly that hold a product in such a way that release surface is parallel with paddle -Paddle is directly attached over disk assembly -Samples are drawn between surface off the medium and top of the paddle blade  Volume:900ml  Temperature:32°C
  • 36.
     USE: Transdermalpatches, ointments, floaters , emulsions.  Modification: Disk design and volume  Advantages:  Easy to handle  Sink conditions are maintained.  Membrane effect is minimum. i.e. drug is placed on a disc at the bottom.  Disadvantages:  Disk assembly restricts the patch size  Borosilicate glass  17 mesh is standard(others available)  Accommodates patches up to 90mm.
  • 37.
     This methodis used for testing the release of drugs from transdermal products.  The apparatus consists of a sample holder or disc assembly that holds the product.  The entire preparation is placed in a dissolution flask filledwith specified medium maintained at 32ºC.  The paddle is placed directly over the disc assembly.  The disk assembly holds the system flat and is positioned such that release surface is placed parallel with the bottom of the paddle blade. Vessel is covered to minimize evaporation during test.  Samples are drawn midway between the surface of dissolution medium and the top of the paddle blade at specified times.
  • 38.
    APPARATUS-6( CYLINDER)  DESIGN: Vessel:- In place of basket, cylinder is used.  Shaft :-Stainless steel 316  Sample :- Mounted to cuprophan (inner porous cellulosic material) an entire system adheres to cylinder. - Dosage unit is placed in cylinder and release from side out.  Water-bath: maintained at 32±0.5°C  USE:  Transdermal patches cannot be cut into small size.  Solid dosage forms, pH profile , small volumes
  • 39.
     METHOD( cylinder): Use the assembly from apparatus 1 except to replace the basket and shaft with a stainless steel cylinder stirring element.  The temperature is maintained at 32±0.5°C.  The dosage unit is placed on the cylinder with side out .  The dosage unit is placed to the exterior of the cylinder such that long axis of the system fits around the circumference of the cylinder and removes trapped air bubbles.  Place the cylinder in the apparatus and immediately rotate at the rate specified in the individual monograph.  Samples are drawn midway between the surface of the dissolution medium and the top of the rotating cylinder for analysis.
  • 40.
     cylinder:  Advantages:-Equipment (apparatus 1)available with the manufacturers can be used with modification as apparatus 6.  Disadvantages:-Large volume of medium is required. -Drug gets diluted & causes difficulties in analysis -Difficult to clean the cylinder.
  • 41.
    APPARATUS-7(RECIPROCATING-DISK)  DESIGN:  Vessel:-Flatbottomed cylindrical vessel -Volume of dissolution medium  Shaft :  Sample : -Placed on disk shaped holders  Agitation :-Reciprocation -Reciprocating frequency 30 cycle/minute  Water-bath:-Maintain at 32±0.5°C  USE:  Transdermal patches shaft disk dissolution medium constant temp water bath
  • 42.
    METHOD(Reciprocating disk):  Theassembly consists of a set of volumetrically calibrated solution containers made of glass or suitable inert material, a motor , a drive assembly used to reciprocate the system vertically.  The samples are placed on the disk shaped holders using cuprophan supports  The test is carried out at 32°C.  The reciprocating frequency is 30cycles/min.  Advantages:-Convenient method for selecting the volume of the medium. -sink conditions can be maintained. -more sensitivity  Disadvantages: -Investment is high because the design is totally different from standard equipment already available in industry.
  • 45.
    4.ALTERNATIVE METHODS 1.ROTATING/STATIC DISKMETHOD  Developed by late Eino Nelson and described by Levy and Sahli.  In this method ,the drug is compressed in a non-disintegrating disc without excipients.  The disc is mounted in a holder so that only one face of the disc is exposed to the dissolution medium.  The holder and disc are immersed in medium and held in a fixed position as in static disc method and rotated at a given speed in rotating disc method.  Samples are collected at predetermined times.  Surface area of the drug through which dissolution occurs is kept constant –intrinsic dissolution rate.
  • 46.
    2.BEAKER METHOD:  Reportedby Levy and Hayes(1960).  Dissolution medium, 250ml of 0.1N HCl at 37°C placed in a 400ml beaker.  Agitation by three blade polyethylene stirrer,5cm diameterand rotates at 60 rpm.  Stirrer immersed to a depth of 2.7 cm in medium and in the center.  Tablets are placed in a beaker and test was carried out.  Samples are removed and assayed for the content. 3.FLASK STIRRER METHOD  Developed by Poole(1969).It includes RBF and a stirring element similar to that of beaker method.  RBF used to avoid the formation of moulds of particles in different positions on the flat bottom of a beaker.
  • 47.
    4.PERISTALSIS METHOD:  Tostimulate hydrodynamic condition of GIT tract in an in-vitro dissolution device.  It consists of rigid plastic cylindrical tubing fitted with septumand rubber stopper at both ends.  Dissolution chamber consists of a space between septum and lower stopper.  Dissolution medium is pumped with peristaltic action through the dosage form. 5.ROTATING BOTTLE METHOD:  It consists of rotating rack to hold sample drug products in bottles and they are capped tightly & rotated in 37°C temperaturebath.  Sample are decanted through a 40 mesh screen and residue are assayed.
  • 48.
    6.DIALYSIS METHOD:  Cellconsist of 32mm inflated membrane.  Plugged at the lower end by tight fitting cylindrical perspex box.  Upper end of the tube held by thin perspex ring inserted into the tube and secured by an elastic band.  The cell suspended , from the arm of the tablet disintegration apparatus and containing the dosage form in 150ml of distilled water at 37°C.  The cell is raised or lowered 30times a min, into 150ml of distilled water at same temperature.  Agitation by slight flexing and stretching of the dialysis membrane as it enters and leaves the bath. Rotated at 60rpm. .
  • 50.
    7.DIFFUSION CELL  Staticor flow through diffusion cells are used to characterize in- vitro drug release and drug permeation kinetics from a topical drug product eg: Ointment, cream or transdermal drug product.  The Franz diffusion cell is static diffusion system used to characterize drug permeation through skin model.  The skin is mounted on the Franz diffusion cell and the drug product is placed on the skin surface.  The drug permeates across the skin into a receptor fluid compartment that may be sampled at various times.  This system is used for selection of appropriate formulation that has optimum drug delivery.
  • 51.
  • 52.
  • 53.
    Dissolution Testing methodsFor some Drug Delivery Systems A number of methods are used to conduct in-vitro evaluation of controlled ocular drug delivery systems. (a) Bottle method In this method, dosage forms are placed in the culture bottles containing phosphate buffer at pH 7.4. The culture bottles are shaken in a thermostatic water bath at 37°C.A sample of medium is taken out at appropriate intervals and analyzed for drug contents. 40 Ocular Drug Delivery Systems
  • 54.
    41 b) Modified rotatingbasket method In this method, dosage form is placed in a basket assembly connected to a stirrer. The assembly is lowered into a jacketed beaker containing buffer medium. The temperature of system is maintained at 37°C. A sample of medium is taken out at appropriate time
  • 55.
     Beaker method The dosage form in this method is made to adhere at the bottom of the beaker containing the medium and stirred uniformly using over head stirrer.  Volume of the medium used for the studies varies from 50-500 ml and the stirrer speed form 60-300 rpm.  Modified Keshary Chien Cell  A specialized apparatus was designed in the laboratory.  It comprised of a Keshary Chien cell containing distilled water (50ml) at 370 c as dissolution medium.  TMDDS (Trans Membrane Drug Delivery System) was placed in a glass tube fitted with a 10# sieve at the bottom which reciprocated in the medium at 30 strokes per min.  Samples are removed at appropriate time intervals and analyzed for drug content. Particulate Drug Delivery systems(MICROSPHERES)
  • 56.
    DISSOLUTION ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Q –Value Defined as a percentage of drug content dissolved in a given time period.
  • 57.
    DISSOLUTION ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA STAGEAcceptance criteria S1 No. of Dosage units tested 6 No Dosage unit is less then Q+5% S2 6 Average Of 12 dosage units (S1+S2) and no dosage unit is S3 12(6+6+12=24) less then Q-15% Average of 24 dosage units >- And not more than two dosage units are less than Q-15% and No dosage unit is less46 than Q-25%
  • 58.
    COMPARISON OF DISSOLUTIONPROFILE Difference factor (f1 Value)- Define as calculate the % Difference between 2 curves at each time point and is a measurement of the relative error between 2 curves. f1= {[Σ t=1n |Rt-Tt|] / [Σ t=1n Rt]} ×100. Values range from 0 to 15 47
  • 59.
     Similarity Factor(f2 value)-define as measurement of similarity in % Dissolution between two curve.  Where Rtand Tt= cumulative % dissolved for reference and test  Values range from 50(similar) to 100(Identical)
  • 60.
    CONCLUSION:  By studyingvarious factors influencing the rate of dissolution, we can optimize type of dissolution method and the different properties of the formulation.  To predict drug product performance it is essential to select suitable dissolution method.  By conducting dissolution studies we can know the batch to batch reproducibility.  In vitro Dissolution profile is used to estimate the In vivo behaviour of the drug product.  The best available tool to atleast quantitatively assure about the biological availability of drug from its formulation is its invitro dissolution.
  • 61.
    REFERENCES  D.M.Brahmankar, Biopharmaceuticsand pharmacokinetics- A Treatise; Vallabh Prakashan, page no. 20–31.  Leon Shargel, Applied Biopharmaceutics & Pharmacokinetics; 4thedition, page no. 132-136.  The Indian Pharmacist, February 2008,Page no.10-12
  • 62.
    United States Pharmacopoeia– 24, page no.: 1942 – 1951. “Current perspectives in dissolution testing of conventional and novel dosage forms”, by Shirazad Azarmi, Wilson Roa, Raimar Lobenberg, Int. jou. Of pharmaceutics 328(2007)12 – 21. Alton’s pharmaceutics “ The design and manufacturing of medicines”, by Michael E. Alton, page no.: 21 – 22.