The document describes techniques used to measure the rate of reactions. Three different methods are used to measure the rate of reaction between calcium carbonate and hydrochloric acid: 1) change in mass of calcium carbonate over time, 2) volume of carbon dioxide produced over time, and 3) change in pressure of carbon dioxide over time. Data from each method using 1M and 2M hydrochloric acid is shown in a table. Two additional reactions are described which use two methods each: change in absorbance over time and change in a visual property (disappearance of a cross or change in mass) over time.
Berikut merupakan referensi penetapan dalam analisis kimia kuantitatif konvensional berdasarkan pengukuran berat ( Gravimetri ) sebagai bahan pertimbangan dalam laporan atau informasi .
Hoofdstuk 5 - Neerslagvorming als kristallijn en colloïdaal verschijnselTom Mortier
Deze presentatie wordt gebruikt tijdens het hoorcollege Niet Instrumentele Analytische Chemie zoals dit wordt gedoceerd aan het departement Gezondheidszorg en Technologie van de Katholieke Hogeschool Leuven.
Berikut merupakan referensi penetapan dalam analisis kimia kuantitatif konvensional berdasarkan pengukuran berat ( Gravimetri ) sebagai bahan pertimbangan dalam laporan atau informasi .
Hoofdstuk 5 - Neerslagvorming als kristallijn en colloïdaal verschijnselTom Mortier
Deze presentatie wordt gebruikt tijdens het hoorcollege Niet Instrumentele Analytische Chemie zoals dit wordt gedoceerd aan het departement Gezondheidszorg en Technologie van de Katholieke Hogeschool Leuven.
Oefeningen op oplosbaarheid en oplosbaarheidsproductenTom Mortier
In deze presentatie zijn enkele specifieke oefeningen uitgewerkt over oplosbaarheid en oplosbaarheidsproducten zoals deze worden gegeven tijdens de oefeningenzittingen behorende bij het vak Niet Instrumentele Analytische Chemie aan het departement Gezondheidszorg en Technologie van de Katholieke Hogeschool Leuven.
Deze presentatie wordt gebruikt tijdens het hoorcollege Niet Instrumentele Analytische Chemie zoals dit wordt gedoceerd aan het departement Gezondheidszorg en Technologie van de Katholieke Hogeschool Leuven.
Errors - pharmaceutical analysis -1, bpharm 1st semester, notes, topic errors
full details and answer about error
TN DR MGR UNIVERSITY
by Kumaran.M.pharm, professor
Oefeningen op oplosbaarheid en oplosbaarheidsproductenTom Mortier
In deze presentatie zijn enkele specifieke oefeningen uitgewerkt over oplosbaarheid en oplosbaarheidsproducten zoals deze worden gegeven tijdens de oefeningenzittingen behorende bij het vak Niet Instrumentele Analytische Chemie aan het departement Gezondheidszorg en Technologie van de Katholieke Hogeschool Leuven.
Deze presentatie wordt gebruikt tijdens het hoorcollege Niet Instrumentele Analytische Chemie zoals dit wordt gedoceerd aan het departement Gezondheidszorg en Technologie van de Katholieke Hogeschool Leuven.
Errors - pharmaceutical analysis -1, bpharm 1st semester, notes, topic errors
full details and answer about error
TN DR MGR UNIVERSITY
by Kumaran.M.pharm, professor
Total Nitrogen Determination - Traditional and Modern MethodsKasun Prabhashwara
This slideshow contains a short overview of importance of total nitrogen determination, traditional Kjeldahl method, its improvements and Dumas method of total nitrogen determination.
IA on effect of inhibitor concentration copper on enzyme catalase (yeast extr...Lawrence kok
IA on effect of inhibitor concentration copper on enzyme catalase (yeast extract) on the rate of decomposition of H2O2 measured using a pressure sensor.
Carbon dioxide transfer characteristics of hollow-fiber, composite membranesTarun Shesh
Carbon dioxide delivery mechanisms for algal cultivation are relatively inefficient. Considering the rising atmospheric carbon dioxide levels, it is imperative to make good use of captured carbon dioxide. One way to do so is to cultivate algae for the production of carbon-neutral biofuels enabling Carbon Capture and Utilization (CCU). In this presentation, I describe my work on membrane carbonation, which is a highly efficient method of carbon dioxide delivery.
This is great Presentation with 3D effects which is all about production of ammonia from natural gas.
I am damn sure you will be getting everything here searching for.
its better to download it and then run in powerpoint 2013.
Karl fischer titration is an analytic system to determine the trace amount of water in solid, gases and liquids. It is a very efficient and accurate technique. In this presentation we go deeper about this titration system.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
How to Create Map Views in the Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
The map views are useful for providing a geographical representation of data. They allow users to visualize and analyze the data in a more intuitive manner.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxEduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher presents at the OECD webinar ‘Digital devices in schools: detrimental distraction or secret to success?’ on 27 May 2024. The presentation was based on findings from PISA 2022 results and the webinar helped launch the PISA in Focus ‘Managing screen time: How to protect and equip students against distraction’ https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/managing-screen-time_7c225af4-en and the OECD Education Policy Perspective ‘Students, digital devices and success’ can be found here - https://oe.cd/il/5yV
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
The Indian economy is classified into different sectors to simplify the analysis and understanding of economic activities. For Class 10, it's essential to grasp the sectors of the Indian economy, understand their characteristics, and recognize their importance. This guide will provide detailed notes on the Sectors of the Indian Economy Class 10, using specific long-tail keywords to enhance comprehension.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology:
Ethnobotany in herbal drug evaluation,
Impact of Ethnobotany in traditional medicine,
New development in herbals,
Bio-prospecting tools for drug discovery,
Role of Ethnopharmacology in drug evaluation,
Reverse Pharmacology.
IB Chemistry Kinetics Design IA and uncertainty calculation for Order and Rate
1. Techniques Used to measure Rate of Rxn
Rxn: CaCO3 with HCI measured using THREE diff methods
CaCO3 + 2HCI → CaCI2 + CO2 + H2O
• Rate = Δ mass CaCO3 over time
• Initial mass recorded
•CaCO3 + 2HCI → CaCI2 + CO2 + H2O
•(CaCO3 limiting,HCI excess)
• 50ml, 1M HCI into flask
• Place on balance
• 1g CaCO3, place on balance
• Record total mass
• Add CaCO3 to flask and start stopwatch
• Mass flask recorded every 1 min interval
•Repeat using 2M HCI
Method 1 Method 3Method 2
Mass
Time Time Time
Volume Pressure
• Rate = Δ vol CO2 over time
• Volume recorded
• Rate = Δ pressure CO2 over time
• Pressure recorded
Procedure
Time/m Total mass
(HCI 1M)
Total mass
(HCI 2M)
0 60.00 60.00
1 59.20 58.10
2 58.80 57.70
3 57.50 56.70
4 57.00 55.40
Mass
Time
2M HCI
1M HCI
2. Techniques Used to measure Rate of Rxn
Rxn: CaCO3 with HCI measured using THREE diff methods
CaCO3 + 2HCI → CaCI2 + CO2 + H2O
• Rate = Δ mass CaCO3 over time
• Initial mass recorded
•CaCO3 + 2HCI → CaCI2 + CO2 + H2O
•(CaCO3 limiting,HCI excess)
• 50ml, 1M HCI into flask
• Add 1g CaCO3 to flask and start stopwatch
• Vol recordedevery 1 min interval
•Repeat using 2M HCI
Method 1 Method 3Method 2
Mass
Time Time Time
Volume Pressure
• Rate = Δ vol CO2 over time
• Volume recorded
• Rate = Δ pressure CO2 over time
• Pressure recorded
Procedure
Time/m Vol CO2
(HCI 1M)
Vol CO2
(HCI 2M)
0 0.0 0.0
1 8.5 14.0
2 15.0 26.5
3 21.0 34.0
4 26.0 39.0
Volume CO2
Time
2M HCI
1M HCI
3. Techniques Used to measure Rate of Rxn
Rxn: CaCO3 with HCI measured using THREE diff methods
CaCO3 + 2HCI → CaCI2 + CO2 + H2O
• Rate = Δ mass CaCO3 over time
• Initial mass recorded
•CaCO3 + 2HCI → CaCI2 + CO2 + H2O
•(CaCO3 limiting,HCI excess)
• 50ml, 1M HCI into flask
• Add 1gCaCO3 to flask and start stopwatch
• Press recorded every 1 min interval
•Repeat using 2M HCI
Method 1 Method 3Method 2
Mass
Time Time Time
Volume Pressure
• Rate = Δ vol CO2 over time
• Volume recorded
• Rate = Δ pressure CO2 over time
• Pressure recorded
Procedure
Time/m Pressure CO2
(HCI 1M)
Pressure CO2
(HCI 2M)
0 101.3 101.3
1 102.4 103.4
2 103.5 105.6
3 110.3 115.2
4 113.5 118.2
Pressure CO2
Time
2M HCI
1M HCI
4. Techniques Used to measure Rate of Rxn
• Rate = Δ mass Sulfur over time
Method 1 Method 2
Mass
Time Time
Light Intensity
• Rate = Δ light intensity over time
• Light intensity recorded
Procedure Conc/M
S2O3
2-
Time/s Rate
1/Time
0.2 80.8 1/80.8 = 0.0123
0.4 40.2 1/40.2 = 0.0248
0.6 25.2 1/25.2 = 0.0396
0.8 20.5 1/20.5 = 0.0487
1.0 18.2 1/18.2 = 0.0550
Rate = 1/time
Conc
Rxn: Na2S2O3 with HCI measured using TWO diff methods
Na2S2O3 + 2HCI → 2NaCI2 + SO2 + H2O + S
• Na2S2O3 + 2HCI → 2NaCI2 + SO2 + H2O + S
• (Na2S2O3 limiting, HCI excess)
•50ml 0.2M HCI into conical flask
• Place on top of paper with cross X
• Pour 5ml 0.1M Na2S2O3 into flask
• Record time for X to disappear
• Repeat with diff S2O3
2-
conc
Light sensor
Light source
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
5. • Na2S2O3 + 2HCI → 2NaCI2 + SO2 + H2O + S
• (Na2S2O3 limiting, HCI excess)
•Pipette 1ml 0.2M S2O3
2-
into cuvette
• Pipette 0.1ml 0.1M HCI into cuvette
• Mix and start light sensor
• Record time for light intensity to drop
• Repeat with diff S2O3
2-
conc
Techniques Used to measure Rate of Rxn
• Rate = Δ mass Sulfur over time
Method 1 Method 2
Mass
Time Time
Light Intensity
• Rate = Δ light intensity over time
• Light intensity recorded
Procedure Conc/M
S2O3
2-
Time/s Rate
1/Time
0.2 80.8 1/80.8 = 0.0123
0.4 40.2 1/40.2 = 0.0248
0.6 25.2 1/25.2 = 0.0396
0.8 20.5 1/20.5 = 0.0487
1.0 18.2 1/18.2 = 0.0550
Rate = 1/time
Rxn: Na2S2O3 with HCI measured using TWO diff methods
Na2S2O3 + 2HCI → 2NaCI2 + SO2 + H2O + S
Light source
Light sensor
Light intensity
0.8M
S2O3
2-
1M
S2O3
2-
Conc
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.818.2 20.3 time
6. • H2O2 + 2KI + 2HCI → 2KCI + 2H2O + I2
(KIlimiting, H2O2 excess)
• Pipette 5ml 3% H2O2, 5ml 0.1M HCI into flask
• Add starch, 1ml 0.1M S2O3 to flask
• Place on white paper with cross X
• Pipette 5 ml 0.1M KI into flask
• Record time for X to disappear
• Repeat with diff KI conc
Techniques Used to measure Rate of Rxn
Method 1 Method 2
Mass iodine produced
Time Time
Absorbance
• Rate = Δ Absorbance over time
• Absorbance recorded
Procedure Conc/M
KI
Time/s Rate
1/Time
0.00625 80.8 1/80.8 = 0.0123
0.0125 40.2 1/40.2 = 0.0248
0.025 25.2 1/25.2 = 0.0396
0.05 20.5 1/20.5 = 0.0487
0.1 18.2 1/18.2 = 0.0550
Rate = 1/time
Conc
Rxn: H2O2 with I -
measured using TWO diff methods
H2O2 + 2I- + 2H+ → 2H2O + I2
Iodine Clock Rxn
H2O2 + 2I - + 2H+ → 2H2O + I2
I2 + 2S2O3
2-
→ S4O6
2-
+ 2I -
I2 + starch → Blue black
H2O2 - Oxidising Agent
I - - Reducing Agent
S203
2-
- Reduce I2 to I –
I2 - I2 react with starch
form blue black
• Rate = Δ mass iodine over time
= Disappearance X due to blue black formation
Abs increase when
blue black form
0.025 0.05 0.1
7. • H2O2 + 2KI + 2HCI → 2KCI + 2H2O + I2
(KIlimiting, H2O2 excess)
• Pipette 0.5ml 3% H2O2, 0.1M HCI to cuvette
• Add starch, 0.1ml 0.1M S2O3 to cuvette
• Pipette 0.5ml 0.2M KI to cuvette
• Record Abs change
• Repeat with diff KI conc
Techniques Used to measure Rate of Rxn
Method 1 Method 2
Mass iodine produced
Time Time
Absorbance
• Rate = Δ Absorbance over time
• Absorbance recorded
Procedure Absorbance
Time
Abs increase when
blue black form
Rxn: H2O2 with I -
measured using TWO diff methods
H2O2 + 2I- + 2H+ → 2H2O + I2
Iodine Clock Rxn
H2O2 + 2I - + 2H+ → 2H2O + I2
I2 + 2S2O3
2-
→ S4O6
2-
+ 2I -
I2 + starch → Blue black
H2O2 - Oxidising Agent
I - - Reducing Agent
S203
2-
- Reduce I2 to I –
I2 - I2 react with starch
form blue black
• Rate = Δ mass iodine over time
= Disappearance X due to blue black formation
Time Conc KI
(0.2)
Abs
Conc KI
(0.4)
Abs
Conc KI
(0.6)
Abs
Conc KI
(0.8)
Abs
0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
4 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.4
6 0.1 0.1 1.2
8 0.1 0.1
10 0.1 1.3
12 0.1
Rate 1/14
= 0.07
1/10
= 0.1
1/6
= 0.16
1/ 4
= 0.25
000000.2M KI0.8M KI
4 6 10 12
8. Techniques Used to measure Rate of Rxn
Method 1 Method 2
Mass iodine produced
Time Time
Absorbance
• Rate = Δ Absorbance over time
• Absorbance recorded
Procedure Conc KI
/M
Time/s Rate
1/Time
0.00625 80.8 1/80.8 = 0.0123
0.0125 40.2 1/40.2 = 0.0248
0.025 25.2 1/25.2 = 0.0396
0.05 20.5 1/20.5 = 0.0487
0.1 18.2 1/18.2 = 0.0550
Rate = 1/time
Conc
Rxn: S2O8
2-
with I -
measured using TWO diff methods
Iodine Clock Rxn
S2O8
2
- Oxidising Agent
I - - Reducing Agent
S203
2-
- Reduce I2 to I –
I2 - I2 react with starch
form blue black
• Rate = Δ mass iodine over time
= Disappearance X due to blue black formation
Abs increase when
blue black form
S2O8
2-
+ 2I -
→ 2SO4
2-
+ I2
S2O8
2-
+ 2I - → 2SO4
2-
+ I2
I2 + 2 S203
2-
→ S406
2-
+ 2I -
I2 + starch → Blue black
• S2O8
2-
+ 2I -
→ 2SO4
2-
+ I2
(KIlimiting, S2O8
2-
excess)
• Pipette 5ml 0.1M KI, 0.1M S2O3
• Add 1ml starch to flask
• Place on white paper with cross X
• Pipette 5 ml 0.1M S2O8
2-
to flask
• Record time for X to disappear
• Repeat with diff KI conc
0.0125 0.025 0.05 0.1
9. • S2O8
2-
+ 2I -
→ 2SO4
2-
+ I2
(KIlimiting, S2O8
2-
excess)
• Pipette 0.5ml 0.1M KI, 0.1M S2O3 to cuvette
• Add 0.1ml starch to cuvette
• Pipette 0.5ml 0.1M S2O8
2-
to cuvette
• Record Abs change
• Repeat with diff KI conc
Techniques Used to measure Rate of Rxn
Method 1 Method 2
Mass iodine produced
Time Time
Absorbance
• Rate = Δ Absorbance over time
• Absorbance recorded
Procedure
Rxn: S2O8
2-
with I -
measured using TWO diff methods
Iodine Clock Rxn
S2O8
2
- Oxidising Agent
I - - Reducing Agent
S203
2-
- Reduce I2 to I –
I2 - I2 react with starch
form blue black
• Rate = Δ mass iodine over time
= Disappearance X due to blue black formation
Abs increase when
blue black form
S2O8
2-
+ 2I -
→ 2SO4
2-
+ I2
S2O8
2-
+ 2I - → 2SO4
2-
+ I2
I2 + 2 S203
2-
→ S406
2-
+ 2I -
I2 + starch → Blue black
Time Conc KI
(0.2)
Abs
Conc KI
(0.4)
Abs
Conc KI
(0.6)
Abs
Conc KI
(0.8)
Abs
0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
4 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.4
6 0.1 0.1 1.2
8 0.1 0.1
10 0.1 1.3
12 0.1
Rate 1/14
= 0.07
1/10
= 0.1
1/6
= 0.16
1/ 4
= 0.25
Absorbance
Time
0.8M KI
00000000000.2M KI
4 6 10 12
10. Techniques Used to measure Rate of Rxn
Method 1 Method 2
Time Time
Volume Pressure
• Rate = Δ vol O2 over time
• Volume recorded
• Rate = Δ pressure O2 over time
• Pressure recorded
Procedure
2H2O2 → O2 + 2H2O
Rxn: H2O2 with KI (catalyst)measured using TWO diff methods
• 2H2O2 → O2 + 2H2O
(H2O2 limiting,KI excess)
• Pipette 1ml 1.0M KI to 20ml of 1.5% H2O2
• Vol O2 released recordedat 1 min interval
• Repeated using 3% H2O2 conc
Time/m Vol O2
(H2O2 1.5%)
Vol O2
(H2O2 3.0%)
0 0.0 0.0
1 8.5 14.0
2 15.0 26.5
3 21.0 34.0
4 26.0 39.0
Volume O2
Time
3 %
1.5 %
11. • 2H2O2 → O2 + 2H2O
(H2O2 limiting,KI excess)
• Pipette 1ml 1.0M KI to 20ml of 1.5% H2O2
• Pressure O2 released recorded at 1 min interval
• Repeat using 3% H2O2 conc
Techniques Used to measure Rate of Rxn
Method 1 Method 2
Time Time
Volume Pressure
• Rate = Δ vol O2 over time
• Volume recorded
• Rate = Δ pressure O2 over time
• Pressure recorded
Procedure
2H2O2 → O2 + 2H2O
Time
3 %
1.5 %
Time/m Pressure O2
(H2O2 1.5%)
Pressure O2
(H2O2 3%)
0 101.3 101.3
1 102.4 103.4
2 103.5 105.6
3 110.3 115.2
4 113.5 118.2
Pressure O2
Rxn: H2O2 with KI (catalyst)measured using TWO diff methods
12. • Rate = Δ Conc I2 over time
• Conc recorded using titration
Techniques Used to measure Rate of Rxn
Method 1 Method 2
Conc iodine produced
Time Time
Absorbance
• Rate = Δ Absorbance over time
• Absorbance recorded
Procedure
Absorbance
Time
Abs increase when
iodine form
2Fe3+
+ 2I -
→ 2Fe2+
+ I2
Rxn: Fe3+
+ I -
measured using TWO diff methods
Fe 3+
- Oxidising Agent
I - - ReducingAgent
• 2Fe3+
+ 2I -
→ 2Fe2+
+ I2
•(I -
limiting, Fe3+
excess)
• Pipette 1.5ml 0.02M Fe3+
to cuvette.
• Find λ max for Fe3+
(450nm)
• Abs vs time , select λ = 450nm
• Pipette 1.0ml 0.02M KI to cuvette
• Measure abs increase due to I2 formation
• Repeat using diff KI conc
Time/s Conc 0.02M KI
Abs
Conc 0.04M KI
Abs
0 0.240 0.240
1 0.245 0.260
2 0.257 0.330
3 0.300 0.390
4 0.330 0.540
0.04 M
0.02 M
13. • 2Fe3+
+ 2I -
→ 2Fe2+
+ I2
(I -
limiting, Fe3+
excess)
• Pipette 25ml 0.02M KI /Fe3+
to flask.
• Start time
• Every 5min, pipette 10ml sol mix to flask
• Titrate with S2O3
2-
( I2 form will react with S2O3
2-
)
Amt I2 produced is determine.
• I2 + 2S203
2-
→ S4O6
2-
+ 2I –
(Mol ratio 1:2)
• Rate = Δ Conc I2 over time
• Conc recorded using titration
Techniques Used to measure Rate of Rxn
Method 1 Method 2
Conc iodine produced
Time Time
Absorbance
• Rate = Δ Absorbance over time
• Absorbance recorded
Procedure
Conc I2
Time
2Fe3+
+ 2I -
→ 2Fe2+
+ I2
Rxn: Fe3+
+ I -
measured using TWO diff methods
Fe 3+
- Oxidising Agent
I - - ReducingAgent
Time/m Vol S2O3/ cm3 Conc I2/M
0 0 0
5 6 0.06
10 18 0.18
15 28 0.28
20 28 0.28
25 ml 0.02M
KI/Fe3+
10ml removed
every 5m
0.2M S2O3
3-
Contain I2
2S203
2-
+ I2 → S4O6
2-
+ 2I –
2 mol S203
2
– 1 mol I2
0.0012 mol – 0.006 mol I2
Vol S203
2-
6.0ml – Amt S203
2-
= M x V
= 0.2 x 0.006
= 0.0012 mol
Conc I2 = Amt I2/Vol
= 0.0006/0.01
= 0.06 M
14. • I2 + CH3COCH3 → CH3COCH2I + H+
+ I –
(CH3COCH3 limiting, I2 excess)
• Pipette 1ml 0.002M I2 to cuvette.
• Abs vs Time (λ max = 520nm)
• Pipette 0.4ml 2M HCI and 1ml water to cuvette
• Pipette 0.4ml 0.2M CH3COCH3 to cuvette
• Record drop in abs over time
• Repeat using diff CH3COCH3 conc
• Rate = Δ Conc I2 over time
• Conc recorded
Techniques Used to measure Rate of Rxn
Method 1 Method 2
Conc iodine
Time Time
Absorbance I2
• Rate = Δ Absorbance over time
• Absorbance recorded
Procedure
Time
Abs decrease
I2 consumed
I2 + CH3COCH3 → CH3COCH2I + H+
+ I -
Rxn: I2 + CH3COCH3 measured using TWO diff methods
Time Conc
(0.2M)
Abs
Conc
(0.4M)
Abs
Conc
(0.6M)
Abs
0 2.00 2.00 2.00
2 1.86 1.76 1.52
4 1.75 1.54 1.20
6 1.57 1.24 0.78
8 1.23 1.23 0.56
10 1.10 0.78 0.40
Rate Gradient
Time 0
Gradient
Time 0
Gradient
Time 0
Absorbance I2
0.2 M
0.4 M0.6 M
Conc CH3COCH3
Rate
15. • Rate = Δ Conc I2 over time
• Conc obtain from std calibrationplot
Techniques Used to measure Rate of Rxn
Method 1 Method 2
Conc iodine
Time Time
Absorbance I2
• Rate = Δ Absorbance over time
• Absorbance recorded
Procedure
I2 + CH3COCH3 → CH3COCH2I + H+
+ I -
Rxn: I2 + CH3COCH3 measured using TWO diff methods
Time Conc I2
(0.2M)
Abs
Conc I2
(0.4M)
Abs
Conc I2
(0.6M)
Abs
0 2.00 2.00 2.00
2 1.86 1.76 1.52
4 1.75 1.54 1.20
6 1.57 1.24 0.78
Absorbance I2
0.2 M
0.4 M0.6 M
Conc I2
• I2 + CH3COCH3 → CH3COCH2I + H+
+ I –
(CH3COCH3 limiting, I2 excess)
• Pipette 1ml 0.002M I2 to cuvette.
• Prepare std calibration plot Abs vs I2 conc
• Abs vs Time (λ max = 520nm)
• Pipette 0.4ml 2M HCI and 1ml water to cuvette
• Pipette 0.4ml 0.2M CH3COCH3 to cuvette
• Record drop in abs over time
• Repeat using diff I2 conc
Convert Abs I2 to conc I2
using std calibration curve
Time
0.2 M
0.4 M0.6 M
Conc I2 Abs
0 0
0.125 0.3
0.25 0.5
0.5 0.7
1.0 1.1
Std calibration curve
Time
16. GraphicalRepresentationof Order :ZERO, FIRST and SECOND order
ZERO ORDER FIRST ORDER SECOND ORDER
Rate – 2nd order respect to [A]
Conc x2 – Rate x 4
Unit for k
Rate = k[A]2
Rate = kA2
k = M-1s-1
Rate
Conc reactant
Rate
Conc reactant Conc reactant
Conc Conc Conc
Time Time Time
Time
Conc reactant
Rate
Time
ln At
Time
1/At
ktAA ot ][][
Rate = k[A]0
Rate independent of [A]
Unit for k
Rate = k[A]0
Rate = k
k = Ms-1
Rate vs Conc – Constant
Conc vs Time – Linear
Rate = k[A]1
Rate - 1st order respect to [A]
Unit for k
Rate = k[A]1
Rate = kA
k = s-1
Rate vs Conc - proportional
Conc vs Time
ktAA
eAA
ot
kt
ot
]ln[]ln[
][][
[A]t
[A]o
kt
AA ot
][
1
][
1
ln Ao
1/Ao
Conc at time t Conc at time t
17. Using 2nd methodto find order
Determinationorder: Na2S2O3 + 2HCI → NaCI + H2O + S + SO2
Order of Na2S2O3
Conc Na2S2O3 changes, fix [HCI] = 0.1M
Na2S2O3 added
HCI was added
Time taken X fade away
Conc
Na2S2O3
Time/s
Trial 1
±0.01
Time/s
Trial 2
±0.01
Time/s
Trial 3
±0.01
Average
time
Rate
0.05 102.96 103.23 114.80 107.00 0.00046
0.10 45.43 44.08 38.35 42.62 0.0023
0.15 27.36 27.13 26.36 26.95 0.0055
0.20 18.06 18.57 17.53 18.05 0.0111
0.25 15.26 15.44 16.88 15.86 0.0158
Result expt
00046.0
107
05.0
.
timeAve
Conc
Rate
Cal for Conc 0.05M
4 ways for uncertainty rate
1st method
Ave time = (107.00 ± 0.01)
% uncertainty time = 9.34 x 10-3 %
%∆ Rate = %∆ Time
Rate = 0.00046 ± 9.34 x 10-3 %
= 0.00046 ± 0.000000043
Too small
Poor choice
4th method
Uncertainty rate = (Max – min) for rate
Rate 1 = Conc/time 1 = 0.05 / 102.96 = 0.00049
Rate 2 = Conc/time 2 = 0.05 / 103.23 = 0.00048
Rate 3 = Conc/ time 3 = 0.05 / 114.80 = 0.00043
Max rate = 0.00049
Min rate = 0.00043
Range = (Max – Min)/2
Range = (0.00049 – 0.00043)/2
= 0.00003
Average rate = (R1 + R2 + R3)/3
= 0.00047 ± 0.00003
Consistent
Good choice
3rd method
Uncertainty rate = std deviation (for conc 0.05)
Rate 1 = Conc/time 1 = 0.05 / 102.96 = 0.00049
Rate 2 = Conc/time 2 = 0.05 / 103.23 = 0.00048
Rate 3 = Conc / time 3 = 0.05 / 114.80 = 0.00043
Average rate = (R1 + R2 + R3)/3
= 0.00047 ± std dev
= 0.00047 ± 0.000032
Consistent
Good choice
2nd method
Using Range (Max – Min) for time
Range = (Max – Min) for time/2
Range = (114.80 – 102.96)/2 = 5.92
Ave time = (107.00 ± 5.92)
% uncertainty time = 5.5%
% ∆Rate = %∆Time
Rate = 0.00046 ± 5.5%
= 0.00046 ± 0.000026
Consistent
Good choice
18. Determinationorder : Na2S2O3 + 2HCI → NaCI + H2O + S + SO2
Order of Na2S2O3
Conc Na2S2O3 changes, fix [HCI] = 0.1M
Na2S2O3 added
HCI was added
Time taken X fade away
Conc
Na2S2O3
Time/s
Trial 1
±0.01
Time/s
Trial 2
±0.01
Time/s
Trial 3
±0.01
Average
time
Rate
0.05 102.96 103.23 114.80 107.00 0.00046
0.10 45.43 44.08 38.35 42.62 0.0023
0.15 27.36 27.13 26.36 26.95 0.0055
0.20 18.06 18.57 17.53 18.05 0.0111
0.25 15.26 15.44 16.88 15.86 0.0158
Result expt
00046.0
00.107
05.0
.
timeAve
Conc
Rate
Cal for Conc 0.05M
2nd method
Using Range (Max – Min) for time
Range = (Max – Min)/2
Range = (114.80 – 102.96)/2 = 5.92
Ave time = (107.00 ± 5.92)
% uncertainty time = 5.5%
% ∆Rate = %∆Time
Rate = 0.00046 ± 5.5%
= 0.00046 ± 0.000026
Consistent
Good choice
Uncertaintyrate for conc 0.05M
Conc
Na2S2O3
Time/s
Trial 1
±0.01
Time/s
Trial 2
±0.01
Time/s
Trial 3
±0.01
Average
time
± Time
Range (Max- Min)/2
% ±Time Rate(±rate)
0.05 102.96 103.23 114.80 107.00 (114.8-102.96)/2= 5.92 5.5% 0.00046±0.000026
0.10 45.43 44.08 38.35 42.62 (45.43 – 38.35)/2 = 3.54 8.3% 0.0023 ±0.00027
0.15 27.36 27.13 26.36 26.95 (27.13 – 26.36)/2 = 0.50 1.8% 0.0055 ±0.00022
0.20 18.06 18.57 17.53 18.05 (18.06 – 17.53)/2 = 0.52 2.8% 0.0111 ±0.0006
0.25 15.26 15.44 16.88 15.86 (16.88 – 15.26)/2 = 0.81 5.1% 0.0158 ±0.0011
19. Determinationorder: Na2S2O3 + 2HCI → NaCI + H2O + S + SO2
Plot of Conc vs Rate
Conc
Na2S2O3
Rate(±rate)
0.05 0.00046±0.0000026
0.10 0.0023 ±0.00027
0.15 0.0055 ±0.00022
0.20 0.0111 ±0.0006
0.25 0.0158 ±0.0011
Order for Na2S2O3 (fix conc HCI)
Let Rate = k[Na2S2O3]x [HCI] y
Rate
Conc Na2S2O3
Uncertainty rate
Conc Na2S2O3
Rate
Best fit
Order = 2.21
Best fit
Order = 2.21
Max fit
Order = 2.29
Min fit
Order = 2.12
Lowest uncertainty (Lowest Conc)
to
Highest uncertainty (Highest Conc)
Highest uncertainty (Lowest Conc)
to
Lowest uncertainty (Highest Conc)
Max order
Min order
20. Determinationorder: Na2S2O3 + 2HCI → NaCI + H2O + S + SO2
Conc
Na2S2O3
Rate(±rate)
0.05 0.00046±0.0000026
0.10 0.0023 ±0.00027
0.15 0.0055 ±0.00022
0.20 0.0111 ±0.0006
0.25 0.0158 ±0.0011
Conc
Na2S2O3
Rate(±rate)
0.05 0.00044
0.10 0.00221
0.15 0.0055
0.20 0.0114
0.25 0.017
Max order
Max fit
Order = 2.29
Max order – Lowest uncertainty (Lowest Conc) to Highest uncertainty (Highest Conc)
Conc
Na2S2O3
Rate(±rate)
0.05 0.00046±0.0000026
0.10 0.0023 ±0.00027
0.15 0.0055 ±0.00022
0.20 0.0111 ±0.0006
0.25 0.0158 ±0.0011
Min order
Conc
Na2S2O3
Rate(±rate)
0.05 0.00048
0.10 0.00248
0.15 0.0055
0.20 0.0108
0.25 0.0147
Conc Na2S2O3
Conc Na2S2O3
Rate
Rate
Min fit
Order = 2.12
Min order – Highest uncertainty (Lowest Conc) to Lowest uncertainty (Highest Conc)
Highest uncertainty
0.0158 + 0.0011
= 0.017
Lowest uncertainty
0.00046 – 0.000026
= 0.00044
Highest uncertainty
0.00046 + 0.000026
= 0.00048
Lowest uncertainty
0.0158 – 0.0011
= 0.0147
Lowest uncertainty
Highest uncertainty
Lowest uncertainty
Highest uncertainty
Max order
Min order
21. Order respect to Na2S2O3 = 2.21
Theoretical order = 2.00
% Error order = 10.7%
Determinationorder: Na2S2O3 + 2HCI → NaCI + H2O + S + SO2
Conc
Na2S2O3
Rate(±rate)
0.05 0.00046±0.0000026
0.10 0.0023 ±0.00027
0.15 0.0055 ±0.00022
0.20 0.0111 ±0.0006
0.25 0.0158 ±0.0011
Order for Na2S2O3 (fix conc HCI)
Let Rate = k[Na2S2O3]x [HCI] 1
Order x = 2.21
Conc Na2S2O3
Rate
Best fit
Order = 2.21
Max fit
Order = 2.29
Min fit
Order = 2.12
Uncertainty order = (Max order – Min order)/2
%7.10%100
00.2
)00.221.2(
± Uncertaintyfor order = (Max – Min order)/2
Max order = 2.29
Min order = 2.12
± Uncertaintyorder
(Max – Min)/2 = ( 2.29 – 2.12)/2
= 0.09
± Uncertaintyorder = 2.21 ± 0.09
% uncertainty order = (0.09/2.21)x 100 %
= 4%
% Error order = 10.7%
% Uncertainty
(Random Error)
% Uncertainty
(SystematicError)
4%
% Error = % Random + % Systematic
error error
% Systematic = (10.7 – 4 )= 6.7%
error
Correct Method !
22. Order respect to Na2S2O3 = 2.21
Theoretical order = 2.00
% Error order = 10.7%
Determinationorder: Na2S2O3 + 2HCI → NaCI + H2O + S + SO2
Conc
Na2S2O3
Rate(±rate)
0.05 0.00046±0.0000026
0.10 0.0023 ±0.00027
0.15 0.0055 ±0.00022
0.20 0.0111 ±0.0006
0.25 0.0158 ±0.0011
Order for Na2S2O3 (fix conc HCI)
Let Rate = k[Na2S2O3]x [HCI] 1
Order x = 2.21
Conc Na2S2O3
Rate
Best fit
Order = 2.21
% Uncertainty rate = % Uncertainty time = 5.5%
%7.10%100
00.2
)00.221.2(
% Error order = 10.7%
% Uncertainty
(Random Error)
% Uncertainty
(SystematicError)
5.5%
Conc
Na2S2O3
Time/s
Trial 1
±0.01
Time/s
Trial 2
±0.01
Time/s
Trial 3
±0.01
Average
time
± Time
Range (Max- Min)/2
% ±Time
0.05 102.96 103.23 114.80 107.00 (114.8-102.96)/2= 5.92 5.5%
0.10 45.43 44.08 38.35 42.62 (45.43 – 38.35)/2 = 3.54 8.3%
0.15 27.36 27.13 26.36 26.95 (27.13 – 26.36)/2 = 0.50 1.8%
0.20 18.06 18.57 17.53 18.05 (18.06 – 17.53)/2 = 0.52 2.8%
0.25 15.26 15.44 16.88 15.86 (16.88 – 15.26)/2 = 0.81 5.1%
Wrong Method !
% Error = % Random + % Systematic
error error
% Systematic = (10.7 – 5.5)= 5.2 %
error