SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
Download to read offline
Using 2nd methodto find order
Determinationorder: Na2S2O3 + 2HCI → NaCI + H2O + S + SO2
Order of Na2S2O3
Conc Na2S2O3 changes, fix [HCI] = 0.1M
Na2S2O3 added
HCI was added
Time taken X fade away
Conc
Na2S2O3
Time/s
Trial 1
±0.01
Time/s
Trial 2
±0.01
Time/s
Trial 3
±0.01
Average
time
Rate
0.05 102.96 103.23 114.80 107.00 0.00046
0.10 45.43 44.08 38.35 42.62 0.0023
0.15 27.36 27.13 26.36 26.95 0.0055
0.20 18.06 18.57 17.53 18.05 0.0111
0.25 15.26 15.44 16.88 15.86 0.0158
Result expt
00046.0
107
05.0
.

timeAve
Conc
Rate
Cal for Conc 0.05M
4 ways for uncertainty rate
1st method
Ave time = (107.00 ± 0.01)
% uncertainty time = 9.34 x 10-3 %
%∆ Rate = % ∆ Time
Rate = 0.00046 ± 9.34 x 10-3 %
= 0.00046 ± 0.000000043
Too small
Poor choice
4th method
Uncertainty rate = (Max – min) for rate
Rate 1 = Conc/time 1 = 0.05 / 102.96 = 0.00049
Rate 2 = Conc/time 2 = 0.05 / 103.23 = 0.00048
Rate 3 = Conc/ time 3 = 0.05 / 114.80 = 0.00043
Max rate = 0.00049
Min rate = 0.00043
Range = (Max – Min)/2
Range = (0.00049 – 0.00043)/2
= 0.00003
Average rate = (R1 + R2 + R3)/3
= 0.00047 ± 0.00003
Consistent
Good choice
3rd method
Uncertainty rate = std deviation (for conc 0.05)
Rate 1 = Conc/time 1 = 0.05 / 102.96 = 0.00049
Rate 2 = Conc/time 2 = 0.05 / 103.23 = 0.00048
Rate 3 = Conc / time 3 = 0.05 / 114.80 = 0.00043
Average rate = (R1 + R2 + R3)/3
= 0.00047 ± std dev
= 0.00047 ± 0.000032
Consistent
Good choice
2nd method
Using Range (Max – Min) for time
Range = (Max – Min) for time/2
Range = (114.80 – 102.96)/2 = 5.92
Ave time = (107.00 ± 5.92)
% uncertainty time = 5.5%
% ∆Rate = % ∆Time
Rate = 0.00046 ± 5.5%
= 0.00046 ± 0.000026
Consistent
Good choice
Determinationorder : Na2S2O3 + 2HCI → NaCI + H2O + S + SO2
Order of Na2S2O3
Conc Na2S2O3 changes, fix [HCI] = 0.1M
Na2S2O3 added
HCI was added
Time taken X fade away
Conc
Na2S2O3
Time/s
Trial 1
±0.01
Time/s
Trial 2
±0.01
Time/s
Trial 3
±0.01
Average
time
Rate
0.05 102.96 103.23 114.80 107.00 0.00046
0.10 45.43 44.08 38.35 42.62 0.0023
0.15 27.36 27.13 26.36 26.95 0.0055
0.20 18.06 18.57 17.53 18.05 0.0111
0.25 15.26 15.44 16.88 15.86 0.0158
Result expt
00046.0
00.107
05.0
.

timeAve
Conc
Rate
Cal for Conc 0.05M
2nd method
Using Range (Max – Min) for time
Range = (Max – Min)/2
Range = (114.80 – 102.96)/2 = 5.92
Ave time = (107.00 ± 5.92)
% uncertainty time = 5.5%
% ∆Rate = %∆Time
Rate = 0.00046 ± 5.5%
= 0.00046 ± 0.000026
Consistent
Good choice
Uncertaintyrate for conc 0.05M
Conc
Na2S2O3
Time/s
Trial 1
±0.01
Time/s
Trial 2
±0.01
Time/s
Trial 3
±0.01
Average
time
± Time
Range (Max- Min)/2
% ±Time Rate(±rate)
0.05 102.96 103.23 114.80 107.00 (114.8-102.96)/2= 5.92 5.5% 0.00046±0.000026
0.10 45.43 44.08 38.35 42.62 (45.43 – 38.35)/2 = 3.54 8.3% 0.0023 ±0.00027
0.15 27.36 27.13 26.36 26.95 (27.13 – 26.36)/2 = 0.50 1.8% 0.0055 ±0.00022
0.20 18.06 18.57 17.53 18.05 (18.06 – 17.53)/2 = 0.52 2.8% 0.0111 ±0.0006
0.25 15.26 15.44 16.88 15.86 (16.88 – 15.26)/2 = 0.81 5.1% 0.0158 ±0.0011
Determinationorder: Na2S2O3 + 2HCI → NaCI + H2O + S + SO2
Plot of Conc vs Rate
Conc
Na2S2O3
Rate(±rate)
0.05 0.00046±0.0000026
0.10 0.0023 ±0.00027
0.15 0.0055 ±0.00022
0.20 0.0111 ±0.0006
0.25 0.0158 ±0.0011
Order for Na2S2O3 (fix conc HCI)
Let Rate = k[Na2S2O3]x [HCI] y
Rate
Conc Na2S2O3
Uncertainty rate
Conc Na2S2O3
Rate
Best fit
Order = 2.21
Best fit
Order = 2.21
Max fit
Order = 2.29
Min fit
Order = 2.12
Lowest uncertainty (Lowest Conc)
to
Highest uncertainty (Highest Conc)
Highest uncertainty (Lowest Conc)
to
Lowest uncertainty (Highest Conc)
Max order
Min order
Determinationorder: Na2S2O3 + 2HCI → NaCI + H2O + S + SO2
Conc
Na2S2O3
Rate(±rate)
0.05 0.00046±0.0000026
0.10 0.0023 ±0.00027
0.15 0.0055 ±0.00022
0.20 0.0111 ±0.0006
0.25 0.0158 ±0.0011
Conc
Na2S2O3
Rate(±rate)
0.05 0.00044
0.10 0.00221
0.15 0.0055
0.20 0.0114
0.25 0.017
Max order
Max fit
Order = 2.29
Max order – Lowest uncertainty (Lowest Conc) to Highest uncertainty (Highest Conc)
Conc
Na2S2O3
Rate(±rate)
0.05 0.00046±0.0000026
0.10 0.0023 ±0.00027
0.15 0.0055 ±0.00022
0.20 0.0111 ±0.0006
0.25 0.0158 ±0.0011
Min order
Conc
Na2S2O3
Rate(±rate)
0.05 0.00048
0.10 0.00248
0.15 0.0055
0.20 0.0108
0.25 0.0147
Conc Na2S2O3
Conc Na2S2O3
Rate
Rate
Min fit
Order = 2.12
Min order – Highest uncertainty (Lowest Conc) to Lowest uncertainty (Highest Conc)
Highest uncertainty
0.0158 + 0.0011
= 0.017
Lowest uncertainty
0.00046 – 0.000026
= 0.00044
Highest uncertainty
0.00046 + 0.000026
= 0.00048
Lowest uncertainty
0.0158 – 0.0011
= 0.0147
Lowest uncertainty
Highest uncertainty
Lowest uncertainty
Highest uncertainty
Max order
Min order
% Systematic = (10.7 – 4 )= 6.7%
error
Order respect to Na2S2O3 = 2.21
Theoretical order = 2.00
% Error order = 10.7%
Determinationorder: Na2S2O3 + 2HCI → NaCI + H2O + S + SO2
Conc
Na2S2O3
Rate(±rate)
0.05 0.00046±0.0000026
0.10 0.0023 ±0.00027
0.15 0.0055 ±0.00022
0.20 0.0111 ±0.0006
0.25 0.0158 ±0.0011
Order for Na2S2O3 (fix conc HCI)
Let Rate = k[Na2S2O3]x [HCI] 1
Order x = 2.21
Conc Na2S2O3
Rate
Best fit
Order = 2.21
Max fit
Order = 2.29
Min fit
Order = 2.12
Uncertainty order = (Max order – Min order)/2
%7.10%100
00.2
)00.221.2(


± Uncertaintyfor order = (Max – Min order)/2
Max order = 2.29
Min order = 2.12
± Uncertaintyorder
(Max – Min)/2 = ( 2.29 – 2.12)/2
= 0.09
± Uncertaintyorder = 2.21 ± 0.09
% uncertainty order = (0.09/2.21)x 100 %
= 4%
% Error order = 10.7%
% Uncertainty
(Random Error)
% Uncertainty
(SystematicError)
4%
% Error = % Random + % Systematic
error error
Correct Method !
Order respect to Na2S2O3 = 2.21
Theoretical order = 2.00
% Error order = 10.7%
Determinationorder: Na2S2O3 + 2HCI → NaCI + H2O + S + SO2
Conc
Na2S2O3
Rate(±rate)
0.05 0.00046±0.0000026
0.10 0.0023 ±0.00027
0.15 0.0055 ±0.00022
0.20 0.0111 ±0.0006
0.25 0.0158 ±0.0011
Order for Na2S2O3 (fix conc HCI)
Let Rate = k[Na2S2O3]x [HCI] 1
Order x = 2.21
Conc Na2S2O3
Rate
Best fit
Order = 2.21
% Uncertainty rate = % Uncertainty time = 5.5%
%7.10%100
00.2
)00.221.2(


% Error order = 10.7%
% Uncertainty
(Random Error)
% Uncertainty
(SystematicError)
5.5%
Conc
Na2S2O3
Time/s
Trial 1
±0.01
Time/s
Trial 2
±0.01
Time/s
Trial 3
±0.01
Average
time
± Time
Range (Max- Min)/2
% ±Time
0.05 102.96 103.23 114.80 107.00 (114.8-102.96)/2= 5.92 5.5%
0.10 45.43 44.08 38.35 42.62 (45.43 – 38.35)/2 = 3.54 8.3%
0.15 27.36 27.13 26.36 26.95 (27.13 – 26.36)/2 = 0.50 1.8%
0.20 18.06 18.57 17.53 18.05 (18.06 – 17.53)/2 = 0.52 2.8%
0.25 15.26 15.44 16.88 15.86 (16.88 – 15.26)/2 = 0.81 5.1%
Wrong Method !
% Error = % Random + % Systematic
error error
% Systematic = (10.7 – 5.5)= 5.2 %
error

More Related Content

What's hot

Ch12 z5e kinetics
Ch12 z5e kineticsCh12 z5e kinetics
Ch12 z5e kinetics
blachman
 
Conductivity rate
Conductivity rateConductivity rate
Conductivity rate
siangzalian
 
12 7 What Are Mole Ratios
12 7 What Are Mole Ratios12 7 What Are Mole Ratios
12 7 What Are Mole Ratios
mrheffner
 

What's hot (20)

IB Chemistry Limiting, Excess, Theoretical and Percentage Yield
IB Chemistry Limiting, Excess, Theoretical and Percentage YieldIB Chemistry Limiting, Excess, Theoretical and Percentage Yield
IB Chemistry Limiting, Excess, Theoretical and Percentage Yield
 
IB Exam Question on Titration, Uncertainty calculation, Ideal Gas and Open En...
IB Exam Question on Titration, Uncertainty calculation, Ideal Gas and Open En...IB Exam Question on Titration, Uncertainty calculation, Ideal Gas and Open En...
IB Exam Question on Titration, Uncertainty calculation, Ideal Gas and Open En...
 
IA on effect of concentration of NaOH on the rate of hydrogen production, bet...
IA on effect of concentration of NaOH on the rate of hydrogen production, bet...IA on effect of concentration of NaOH on the rate of hydrogen production, bet...
IA on effect of concentration of NaOH on the rate of hydrogen production, bet...
 
IB Chemistry Real, Ideal Gas and Deviation from Ideal Gas behaviour
IB Chemistry Real, Ideal Gas and Deviation from Ideal Gas behaviourIB Chemistry Real, Ideal Gas and Deviation from Ideal Gas behaviour
IB Chemistry Real, Ideal Gas and Deviation from Ideal Gas behaviour
 
Ch 6- fugacidad mezcla
Ch 6- fugacidad mezclaCh 6- fugacidad mezcla
Ch 6- fugacidad mezcla
 
Ch12 z5e kinetics
Ch12 z5e kineticsCh12 z5e kinetics
Ch12 z5e kinetics
 
Introduction To Environmental Engineering 4th Edition Davis Solutions Manual
Introduction To Environmental Engineering 4th Edition Davis Solutions ManualIntroduction To Environmental Engineering 4th Edition Davis Solutions Manual
Introduction To Environmental Engineering 4th Edition Davis Solutions Manual
 
Diethyl Ether (DEE): Energy Balance
Diethyl Ether (DEE): Energy BalanceDiethyl Ether (DEE): Energy Balance
Diethyl Ether (DEE): Energy Balance
 
Conductivity rate
Conductivity rateConductivity rate
Conductivity rate
 
Conductivity rate
Conductivity rateConductivity rate
Conductivity rate
 
Diethyl Ether (DEE): Equipments Design
Diethyl Ether (DEE): Equipments DesignDiethyl Ether (DEE): Equipments Design
Diethyl Ether (DEE): Equipments Design
 
Episode 61 : MATERIAL BALANCE FOR REACTING SYSTEM
Episode 61 : MATERIAL BALANCE FOR REACTING SYSTEM Episode 61 : MATERIAL BALANCE FOR REACTING SYSTEM
Episode 61 : MATERIAL BALANCE FOR REACTING SYSTEM
 
IB Chemistry Ideal Gas Equation, Kinetic Theory and RMM determination of gas
IB Chemistry Ideal Gas Equation, Kinetic Theory and RMM determination of gasIB Chemistry Ideal Gas Equation, Kinetic Theory and RMM determination of gas
IB Chemistry Ideal Gas Equation, Kinetic Theory and RMM determination of gas
 
Gabarito Fox Mecanica dos Fluidos cap 1 a 6
Gabarito Fox Mecanica dos Fluidos cap 1 a 6Gabarito Fox Mecanica dos Fluidos cap 1 a 6
Gabarito Fox Mecanica dos Fluidos cap 1 a 6
 
Episode 62 : MATERIAL BALANCE FOR REACTING SYSTEM
Episode 62 :  MATERIAL BALANCE FOR REACTING SYSTEM Episode 62 :  MATERIAL BALANCE FOR REACTING SYSTEM
Episode 62 : MATERIAL BALANCE FOR REACTING SYSTEM
 
Wtp design
Wtp designWtp design
Wtp design
 
12 7 What Are Mole Ratios
12 7 What Are Mole Ratios12 7 What Are Mole Ratios
12 7 What Are Mole Ratios
 
Sm chap01
Sm chap01Sm chap01
Sm chap01
 
Episode 40 : DESIGN EXAMPLE – DILUTE PHASE PNEUMATIC CONVEYING
Episode 40 :  DESIGN EXAMPLE – DILUTE PHASE PNEUMATIC CONVEYINGEpisode 40 :  DESIGN EXAMPLE – DILUTE PHASE PNEUMATIC CONVEYING
Episode 40 : DESIGN EXAMPLE – DILUTE PHASE PNEUMATIC CONVEYING
 
Episode 40 : DESIGN EXAMPLE – DILUTE PHASE PNEUMATIC CONVEYING (Part 2)
Episode 40 : DESIGN EXAMPLE – DILUTE PHASE PNEUMATIC CONVEYING (Part 2)Episode 40 : DESIGN EXAMPLE – DILUTE PHASE PNEUMATIC CONVEYING (Part 2)
Episode 40 : DESIGN EXAMPLE – DILUTE PHASE PNEUMATIC CONVEYING (Part 2)
 

More from Lawrence kok

More from Lawrence kok (20)

IA on effect of duration on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (yeast e...
IA on effect of duration on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (yeast e...IA on effect of duration on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (yeast e...
IA on effect of duration on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (yeast e...
 
IA on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (yeast extract) in alginate be...
IA on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (yeast extract) in alginate be...IA on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (yeast extract) in alginate be...
IA on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (yeast extract) in alginate be...
 
IA on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (yeast extract) in alginate be...
IA on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (yeast extract) in alginate be...IA on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (yeast extract) in alginate be...
IA on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (yeast extract) in alginate be...
 
IA on effect of duration on the efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (fun...
IA on effect of duration on the efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (fun...IA on effect of duration on the efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (fun...
IA on effect of duration on the efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (fun...
 
IA on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (fungal extract) in alginate b...
IA on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (fungal extract) in alginate b...IA on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (fungal extract) in alginate b...
IA on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (fungal extract) in alginate b...
 
IA on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (fungal extract) in alginate b...
IA on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (fungal extract) in alginate b...IA on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (fungal extract) in alginate b...
IA on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (fungal extract) in alginate b...
 
IA on effect of duration on efficiency of immobilized MnO2 in alginate beads ...
IA on effect of duration on efficiency of immobilized MnO2 in alginate beads ...IA on effect of duration on efficiency of immobilized MnO2 in alginate beads ...
IA on effect of duration on efficiency of immobilized MnO2 in alginate beads ...
 
IA on effect of concentration of sodium alginate and calcium chloride in maki...
IA on effect of concentration of sodium alginate and calcium chloride in maki...IA on effect of concentration of sodium alginate and calcium chloride in maki...
IA on effect of concentration of sodium alginate and calcium chloride in maki...
 
IA on effect of temperature on polyphenol (tannins) of white wine, using pota...
IA on effect of temperature on polyphenol (tannins) of white wine, using pota...IA on effect of temperature on polyphenol (tannins) of white wine, using pota...
IA on effect of temperature on polyphenol (tannins) of white wine, using pota...
 
IA on effect of temperature on polyphenol (tannins) of green tea, using potas...
IA on effect of temperature on polyphenol (tannins) of green tea, using potas...IA on effect of temperature on polyphenol (tannins) of green tea, using potas...
IA on effect of temperature on polyphenol (tannins) of green tea, using potas...
 
IA on effect of duration (steeping time) on polyphenol (tannins) of tea, usin...
IA on effect of duration (steeping time) on polyphenol (tannins) of tea, usin...IA on effect of duration (steeping time) on polyphenol (tannins) of tea, usin...
IA on effect of duration (steeping time) on polyphenol (tannins) of tea, usin...
 
IA on polyphenol (tannins) quantification between green and black tea using p...
IA on polyphenol (tannins) quantification between green and black tea using p...IA on polyphenol (tannins) quantification between green and black tea using p...
IA on polyphenol (tannins) quantification between green and black tea using p...
 
IA on temperature on polyphenol (tannins strawberry) quantification using pot...
IA on temperature on polyphenol (tannins strawberry) quantification using pot...IA on temperature on polyphenol (tannins strawberry) quantification using pot...
IA on temperature on polyphenol (tannins strawberry) quantification using pot...
 
IA on temperature on polyphenol (tannins apple cider) quantification using po...
IA on temperature on polyphenol (tannins apple cider) quantification using po...IA on temperature on polyphenol (tannins apple cider) quantification using po...
IA on temperature on polyphenol (tannins apple cider) quantification using po...
 
IA on effect of temperature on polyphenol (tannins) quantification using pota...
IA on effect of temperature on polyphenol (tannins) quantification using pota...IA on effect of temperature on polyphenol (tannins) quantification using pota...
IA on effect of temperature on polyphenol (tannins) quantification using pota...
 
IA on polyphenol quantification using potassium permanganate titration (Lowen...
IA on polyphenol quantification using potassium permanganate titration (Lowen...IA on polyphenol quantification using potassium permanganate titration (Lowen...
IA on polyphenol quantification using potassium permanganate titration (Lowen...
 
IA on rate of hydrolysis of aspirin at different temperature, measured using ...
IA on rate of hydrolysis of aspirin at different temperature, measured using ...IA on rate of hydrolysis of aspirin at different temperature, measured using ...
IA on rate of hydrolysis of aspirin at different temperature, measured using ...
 
IA on hydrolysis of aspirin in water, duration over 5 days, measured using vi...
IA on hydrolysis of aspirin in water, duration over 5 days, measured using vi...IA on hydrolysis of aspirin in water, duration over 5 days, measured using vi...
IA on hydrolysis of aspirin in water, duration over 5 days, measured using vi...
 
IA on aspirin hydrolysis in different HCI concentration (0.0625 -1M), measure...
IA on aspirin hydrolysis in different HCI concentration (0.0625 -1M), measure...IA on aspirin hydrolysis in different HCI concentration (0.0625 -1M), measure...
IA on aspirin hydrolysis in different HCI concentration (0.0625 -1M), measure...
 
IA on aspirin hydrolysis in different medium, water vs acid (1M) medium, meas...
IA on aspirin hydrolysis in different medium, water vs acid (1M) medium, meas...IA on aspirin hydrolysis in different medium, water vs acid (1M) medium, meas...
IA on aspirin hydrolysis in different medium, water vs acid (1M) medium, meas...
 

Recently uploaded

會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文
會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文
會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文
中 央社
 
Personalisation of Education by AI and Big Data - Lourdes Guàrdia
Personalisation of Education by AI and Big Data - Lourdes GuàrdiaPersonalisation of Education by AI and Big Data - Lourdes Guàrdia
Personalisation of Education by AI and Big Data - Lourdes Guàrdia
EADTU
 
MuleSoft Integration with AWS Textract | Calling AWS Textract API |AWS - Clou...
MuleSoft Integration with AWS Textract | Calling AWS Textract API |AWS - Clou...MuleSoft Integration with AWS Textract | Calling AWS Textract API |AWS - Clou...
MuleSoft Integration with AWS Textract | Calling AWS Textract API |AWS - Clou...
MysoreMuleSoftMeetup
 
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPSSpellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
AnaAcapella
 
SPLICE Working Group: Reusable Code Examples
SPLICE Working Group:Reusable Code ExamplesSPLICE Working Group:Reusable Code Examples
SPLICE Working Group: Reusable Code Examples
Peter Brusilovsky
 

Recently uploaded (20)

FICTIONAL SALESMAN/SALESMAN SNSW 2024.pdf
FICTIONAL SALESMAN/SALESMAN SNSW 2024.pdfFICTIONAL SALESMAN/SALESMAN SNSW 2024.pdf
FICTIONAL SALESMAN/SALESMAN SNSW 2024.pdf
 
The Story of Village Palampur Class 9 Free Study Material PDF
The Story of Village Palampur Class 9 Free Study Material PDFThe Story of Village Palampur Class 9 Free Study Material PDF
The Story of Village Palampur Class 9 Free Study Material PDF
 
VAMOS CUIDAR DO NOSSO PLANETA! .
VAMOS CUIDAR DO NOSSO PLANETA!                    .VAMOS CUIDAR DO NOSSO PLANETA!                    .
VAMOS CUIDAR DO NOSSO PLANETA! .
 
UChicago CMSC 23320 - The Best Commit Messages of 2024
UChicago CMSC 23320 - The Best Commit Messages of 2024UChicago CMSC 23320 - The Best Commit Messages of 2024
UChicago CMSC 23320 - The Best Commit Messages of 2024
 
會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文
會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文
會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文
 
Personalisation of Education by AI and Big Data - Lourdes Guàrdia
Personalisation of Education by AI and Big Data - Lourdes GuàrdiaPersonalisation of Education by AI and Big Data - Lourdes Guàrdia
Personalisation of Education by AI and Big Data - Lourdes Guàrdia
 
24 ĐỀ THAM KHẢO KÌ THI TUYỂN SINH VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH SỞ GIÁO DỤC HẢI DƯ...
24 ĐỀ THAM KHẢO KÌ THI TUYỂN SINH VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH SỞ GIÁO DỤC HẢI DƯ...24 ĐỀ THAM KHẢO KÌ THI TUYỂN SINH VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH SỞ GIÁO DỤC HẢI DƯ...
24 ĐỀ THAM KHẢO KÌ THI TUYỂN SINH VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH SỞ GIÁO DỤC HẢI DƯ...
 
Basic Civil Engineering notes on Transportation Engineering & Modes of Transport
Basic Civil Engineering notes on Transportation Engineering & Modes of TransportBasic Civil Engineering notes on Transportation Engineering & Modes of Transport
Basic Civil Engineering notes on Transportation Engineering & Modes of Transport
 
Trauma-Informed Leadership - Five Practical Principles
Trauma-Informed Leadership - Five Practical PrinciplesTrauma-Informed Leadership - Five Practical Principles
Trauma-Informed Leadership - Five Practical Principles
 
OSCM Unit 2_Operations Processes & Systems
OSCM Unit 2_Operations Processes & SystemsOSCM Unit 2_Operations Processes & Systems
OSCM Unit 2_Operations Processes & Systems
 
Observing-Correct-Grammar-in-Making-Definitions.pptx
Observing-Correct-Grammar-in-Making-Definitions.pptxObserving-Correct-Grammar-in-Making-Definitions.pptx
Observing-Correct-Grammar-in-Making-Definitions.pptx
 
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...
 
OS-operating systems- ch05 (CPU Scheduling) ...
OS-operating systems- ch05 (CPU Scheduling) ...OS-operating systems- ch05 (CPU Scheduling) ...
OS-operating systems- ch05 (CPU Scheduling) ...
 
male presentation...pdf.................
male presentation...pdf.................male presentation...pdf.................
male presentation...pdf.................
 
Stl Algorithms in C++ jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj
Stl Algorithms in C++ jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjStl Algorithms in C++ jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj
Stl Algorithms in C++ jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj
 
Andreas Schleicher presents at the launch of What does child empowerment mean...
Andreas Schleicher presents at the launch of What does child empowerment mean...Andreas Schleicher presents at the launch of What does child empowerment mean...
Andreas Schleicher presents at the launch of What does child empowerment mean...
 
When Quality Assurance Meets Innovation in Higher Education - Report launch w...
When Quality Assurance Meets Innovation in Higher Education - Report launch w...When Quality Assurance Meets Innovation in Higher Education - Report launch w...
When Quality Assurance Meets Innovation in Higher Education - Report launch w...
 
MuleSoft Integration with AWS Textract | Calling AWS Textract API |AWS - Clou...
MuleSoft Integration with AWS Textract | Calling AWS Textract API |AWS - Clou...MuleSoft Integration with AWS Textract | Calling AWS Textract API |AWS - Clou...
MuleSoft Integration with AWS Textract | Calling AWS Textract API |AWS - Clou...
 
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPSSpellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
 
SPLICE Working Group: Reusable Code Examples
SPLICE Working Group:Reusable Code ExamplesSPLICE Working Group:Reusable Code Examples
SPLICE Working Group: Reusable Code Examples
 

IB Chemistry on Uncertainty calculation for Order and Rate of reaction

  • 1. Using 2nd methodto find order Determinationorder: Na2S2O3 + 2HCI → NaCI + H2O + S + SO2 Order of Na2S2O3 Conc Na2S2O3 changes, fix [HCI] = 0.1M Na2S2O3 added HCI was added Time taken X fade away Conc Na2S2O3 Time/s Trial 1 ±0.01 Time/s Trial 2 ±0.01 Time/s Trial 3 ±0.01 Average time Rate 0.05 102.96 103.23 114.80 107.00 0.00046 0.10 45.43 44.08 38.35 42.62 0.0023 0.15 27.36 27.13 26.36 26.95 0.0055 0.20 18.06 18.57 17.53 18.05 0.0111 0.25 15.26 15.44 16.88 15.86 0.0158 Result expt 00046.0 107 05.0 .  timeAve Conc Rate Cal for Conc 0.05M 4 ways for uncertainty rate 1st method Ave time = (107.00 ± 0.01) % uncertainty time = 9.34 x 10-3 % %∆ Rate = % ∆ Time Rate = 0.00046 ± 9.34 x 10-3 % = 0.00046 ± 0.000000043 Too small Poor choice 4th method Uncertainty rate = (Max – min) for rate Rate 1 = Conc/time 1 = 0.05 / 102.96 = 0.00049 Rate 2 = Conc/time 2 = 0.05 / 103.23 = 0.00048 Rate 3 = Conc/ time 3 = 0.05 / 114.80 = 0.00043 Max rate = 0.00049 Min rate = 0.00043 Range = (Max – Min)/2 Range = (0.00049 – 0.00043)/2 = 0.00003 Average rate = (R1 + R2 + R3)/3 = 0.00047 ± 0.00003 Consistent Good choice 3rd method Uncertainty rate = std deviation (for conc 0.05) Rate 1 = Conc/time 1 = 0.05 / 102.96 = 0.00049 Rate 2 = Conc/time 2 = 0.05 / 103.23 = 0.00048 Rate 3 = Conc / time 3 = 0.05 / 114.80 = 0.00043 Average rate = (R1 + R2 + R3)/3 = 0.00047 ± std dev = 0.00047 ± 0.000032 Consistent Good choice 2nd method Using Range (Max – Min) for time Range = (Max – Min) for time/2 Range = (114.80 – 102.96)/2 = 5.92 Ave time = (107.00 ± 5.92) % uncertainty time = 5.5% % ∆Rate = % ∆Time Rate = 0.00046 ± 5.5% = 0.00046 ± 0.000026 Consistent Good choice
  • 2. Determinationorder : Na2S2O3 + 2HCI → NaCI + H2O + S + SO2 Order of Na2S2O3 Conc Na2S2O3 changes, fix [HCI] = 0.1M Na2S2O3 added HCI was added Time taken X fade away Conc Na2S2O3 Time/s Trial 1 ±0.01 Time/s Trial 2 ±0.01 Time/s Trial 3 ±0.01 Average time Rate 0.05 102.96 103.23 114.80 107.00 0.00046 0.10 45.43 44.08 38.35 42.62 0.0023 0.15 27.36 27.13 26.36 26.95 0.0055 0.20 18.06 18.57 17.53 18.05 0.0111 0.25 15.26 15.44 16.88 15.86 0.0158 Result expt 00046.0 00.107 05.0 .  timeAve Conc Rate Cal for Conc 0.05M 2nd method Using Range (Max – Min) for time Range = (Max – Min)/2 Range = (114.80 – 102.96)/2 = 5.92 Ave time = (107.00 ± 5.92) % uncertainty time = 5.5% % ∆Rate = %∆Time Rate = 0.00046 ± 5.5% = 0.00046 ± 0.000026 Consistent Good choice Uncertaintyrate for conc 0.05M Conc Na2S2O3 Time/s Trial 1 ±0.01 Time/s Trial 2 ±0.01 Time/s Trial 3 ±0.01 Average time ± Time Range (Max- Min)/2 % ±Time Rate(±rate) 0.05 102.96 103.23 114.80 107.00 (114.8-102.96)/2= 5.92 5.5% 0.00046±0.000026 0.10 45.43 44.08 38.35 42.62 (45.43 – 38.35)/2 = 3.54 8.3% 0.0023 ±0.00027 0.15 27.36 27.13 26.36 26.95 (27.13 – 26.36)/2 = 0.50 1.8% 0.0055 ±0.00022 0.20 18.06 18.57 17.53 18.05 (18.06 – 17.53)/2 = 0.52 2.8% 0.0111 ±0.0006 0.25 15.26 15.44 16.88 15.86 (16.88 – 15.26)/2 = 0.81 5.1% 0.0158 ±0.0011
  • 3. Determinationorder: Na2S2O3 + 2HCI → NaCI + H2O + S + SO2 Plot of Conc vs Rate Conc Na2S2O3 Rate(±rate) 0.05 0.00046±0.0000026 0.10 0.0023 ±0.00027 0.15 0.0055 ±0.00022 0.20 0.0111 ±0.0006 0.25 0.0158 ±0.0011 Order for Na2S2O3 (fix conc HCI) Let Rate = k[Na2S2O3]x [HCI] y Rate Conc Na2S2O3 Uncertainty rate Conc Na2S2O3 Rate Best fit Order = 2.21 Best fit Order = 2.21 Max fit Order = 2.29 Min fit Order = 2.12 Lowest uncertainty (Lowest Conc) to Highest uncertainty (Highest Conc) Highest uncertainty (Lowest Conc) to Lowest uncertainty (Highest Conc) Max order Min order
  • 4. Determinationorder: Na2S2O3 + 2HCI → NaCI + H2O + S + SO2 Conc Na2S2O3 Rate(±rate) 0.05 0.00046±0.0000026 0.10 0.0023 ±0.00027 0.15 0.0055 ±0.00022 0.20 0.0111 ±0.0006 0.25 0.0158 ±0.0011 Conc Na2S2O3 Rate(±rate) 0.05 0.00044 0.10 0.00221 0.15 0.0055 0.20 0.0114 0.25 0.017 Max order Max fit Order = 2.29 Max order – Lowest uncertainty (Lowest Conc) to Highest uncertainty (Highest Conc) Conc Na2S2O3 Rate(±rate) 0.05 0.00046±0.0000026 0.10 0.0023 ±0.00027 0.15 0.0055 ±0.00022 0.20 0.0111 ±0.0006 0.25 0.0158 ±0.0011 Min order Conc Na2S2O3 Rate(±rate) 0.05 0.00048 0.10 0.00248 0.15 0.0055 0.20 0.0108 0.25 0.0147 Conc Na2S2O3 Conc Na2S2O3 Rate Rate Min fit Order = 2.12 Min order – Highest uncertainty (Lowest Conc) to Lowest uncertainty (Highest Conc) Highest uncertainty 0.0158 + 0.0011 = 0.017 Lowest uncertainty 0.00046 – 0.000026 = 0.00044 Highest uncertainty 0.00046 + 0.000026 = 0.00048 Lowest uncertainty 0.0158 – 0.0011 = 0.0147 Lowest uncertainty Highest uncertainty Lowest uncertainty Highest uncertainty Max order Min order
  • 5. % Systematic = (10.7 – 4 )= 6.7% error Order respect to Na2S2O3 = 2.21 Theoretical order = 2.00 % Error order = 10.7% Determinationorder: Na2S2O3 + 2HCI → NaCI + H2O + S + SO2 Conc Na2S2O3 Rate(±rate) 0.05 0.00046±0.0000026 0.10 0.0023 ±0.00027 0.15 0.0055 ±0.00022 0.20 0.0111 ±0.0006 0.25 0.0158 ±0.0011 Order for Na2S2O3 (fix conc HCI) Let Rate = k[Na2S2O3]x [HCI] 1 Order x = 2.21 Conc Na2S2O3 Rate Best fit Order = 2.21 Max fit Order = 2.29 Min fit Order = 2.12 Uncertainty order = (Max order – Min order)/2 %7.10%100 00.2 )00.221.2(   ± Uncertaintyfor order = (Max – Min order)/2 Max order = 2.29 Min order = 2.12 ± Uncertaintyorder (Max – Min)/2 = ( 2.29 – 2.12)/2 = 0.09 ± Uncertaintyorder = 2.21 ± 0.09 % uncertainty order = (0.09/2.21)x 100 % = 4% % Error order = 10.7% % Uncertainty (Random Error) % Uncertainty (SystematicError) 4% % Error = % Random + % Systematic error error Correct Method !
  • 6. Order respect to Na2S2O3 = 2.21 Theoretical order = 2.00 % Error order = 10.7% Determinationorder: Na2S2O3 + 2HCI → NaCI + H2O + S + SO2 Conc Na2S2O3 Rate(±rate) 0.05 0.00046±0.0000026 0.10 0.0023 ±0.00027 0.15 0.0055 ±0.00022 0.20 0.0111 ±0.0006 0.25 0.0158 ±0.0011 Order for Na2S2O3 (fix conc HCI) Let Rate = k[Na2S2O3]x [HCI] 1 Order x = 2.21 Conc Na2S2O3 Rate Best fit Order = 2.21 % Uncertainty rate = % Uncertainty time = 5.5% %7.10%100 00.2 )00.221.2(   % Error order = 10.7% % Uncertainty (Random Error) % Uncertainty (SystematicError) 5.5% Conc Na2S2O3 Time/s Trial 1 ±0.01 Time/s Trial 2 ±0.01 Time/s Trial 3 ±0.01 Average time ± Time Range (Max- Min)/2 % ±Time 0.05 102.96 103.23 114.80 107.00 (114.8-102.96)/2= 5.92 5.5% 0.10 45.43 44.08 38.35 42.62 (45.43 – 38.35)/2 = 3.54 8.3% 0.15 27.36 27.13 26.36 26.95 (27.13 – 26.36)/2 = 0.50 1.8% 0.20 18.06 18.57 17.53 18.05 (18.06 – 17.53)/2 = 0.52 2.8% 0.25 15.26 15.44 16.88 15.86 (16.88 – 15.26)/2 = 0.81 5.1% Wrong Method ! % Error = % Random + % Systematic error error % Systematic = (10.7 – 5.5)= 5.2 % error