This document discusses bibliometric analysis and summarizes two studies that used bibliometric methods. The first study analyzed citations in social gerontology journals to understand reliance on different disciplines and best databases. It found social gerontology draws from both social sciences and medicine, and broad multidisciplinary databases are best. The second study compared Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar for citations to social work literature. It found value in using all three databases for the most accurate impact measurement. The document advocates for bibliometrics to provide insights but also cautions to interpret results carefully.
Using Bibliometrics Tools to Increase the visibility of your publicationsCiarĂĄn Quinn
Â
Strategies to increase the visibility of your research including using keywords, Bibliometric resources, measuring your H Index,Journal Impact, Article level metrics, Altmetrics, and Academic Social Networks
Presentation covering introduction to bibliometrics. Suggested audience: PGRs, early career researchers, academic staff wanting refresher, research support staff
Using Bibliometrics Tools to Increase the visibility of your publicationsCiarĂĄn Quinn
Â
Strategies to increase the visibility of your research including using keywords, Bibliometric resources, measuring your H Index,Journal Impact, Article level metrics, Altmetrics, and Academic Social Networks
Presentation covering introduction to bibliometrics. Suggested audience: PGRs, early career researchers, academic staff wanting refresher, research support staff
Discussion of alternatives to traditional bibliometric sources (many free) including Scopus, eigenfactor, SNIP, SJR, altmetrics, Publish or Perish, Microsoft Academic Search
These slides are used to teach STEM undergraduates who are at West Virginia University in the summer to work in labs with nanoscience and nanotechnology researchers. The final project is a poster on their research
A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science...Nader Ale Ebrahim
Â
Nowadays, the worldâs scientific community has been publishing an enormous number of papers in different scientific fields. In such environment, it is essential to know which databases are equally efficient and objective for literature searches. It seems that two most extensive databases are Web of Science and Scopus. Besides searching the literature, these two databases used to rank journals in terms of their productivity and the total citations received to indicate the journals impact, prestige or influence. This article attempts to provide a comprehensive comparison of these databases to answer frequent questions which researchers ask, such as: How Web of Science and Scopus are different? In which aspects these two databases are similar? Or, if the researchers are forced to choose one of them, which one should they prefer? For answering these questions, these two databases will be compared based on their qualitative and quantitative characteristics.
Discussion of alternatives to traditional bibliometric sources (many free) including Scopus, eigenfactor, SNIP, SJR, altmetrics, Publish or Perish, Microsoft Academic Search
These slides are used to teach STEM undergraduates who are at West Virginia University in the summer to work in labs with nanoscience and nanotechnology researchers. The final project is a poster on their research
A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science...Nader Ale Ebrahim
Â
Nowadays, the worldâs scientific community has been publishing an enormous number of papers in different scientific fields. In such environment, it is essential to know which databases are equally efficient and objective for literature searches. It seems that two most extensive databases are Web of Science and Scopus. Besides searching the literature, these two databases used to rank journals in terms of their productivity and the total citations received to indicate the journals impact, prestige or influence. This article attempts to provide a comprehensive comparison of these databases to answer frequent questions which researchers ask, such as: How Web of Science and Scopus are different? In which aspects these two databases are similar? Or, if the researchers are forced to choose one of them, which one should they prefer? For answering these questions, these two databases will be compared based on their qualitative and quantitative characteristics.
This presentation was provided by John G. Dove of Credo Reference during the NISO event "Next Generation Discovery Tools: New Tools, Aging Standards," held March 27 - March 28, 2008.
Bibliometrics, Journal Impact Factors and Maximising the Cite-ability of Jour...Jamie Bisset
Â
Most recent version of slides from Durham "Bibliometrics, Journal Impact Factors and Maximising the Cite-ability of Journal Articles" session.. Delivered as part of the Durham University Researcher Development Programme.
[Last Devlivered November 2014]
Further Training available at https://www.dur.ac.uk/library/research/training/
1� The New Social Worker Spring �007
Considerations in Writing a Literature Review
by Kathy Black, Ph.D.
Literature reviews are ubiquitous in
academic journals, scholarly reports, and
social work education. Students taking
social work courses throughout the cur-
riculum, including Human Behavior and
the Social Environment, Practice, Policy,
and Research classes, are frequently
asked to write literature reviews for a
variety of reasons. Literature reviews are
often done within the context of writing
a paper and sometimes done as a mini-
assignment, perhaps setting the frame
for a broader paper, exposing students
to the breadth of information available
on a topic area, or demonstrating skills
in critical thinking and writing ability.
However, there are some
general guidelines to follow
when writing a literature re-
view. This article will briefly
outline key points for you to
keep in mind when writing
literature reviews for social
work.
Getting Ready
To begin with, you
will need to ascertain the
purpose of the literature
review. At the very least, be
aware of the purpose, scope,
and length of the literature review, as
well as the writing requirements. This
requires clarifying the purpose (Is it to
simply overview a broad or specific area of
inquiry, or is it expected to be comprehensive
or systematic?), scope (How much informa-
tion is neededâthree scholarly sources? Five
or 10 sources? Are there any limits to the
inquiry? Perhaps a focus on distinct ethnici-
ties or time periods?), and length (Is the
final review expected to yield one page or
10 pages of review?). You should also be
familiar with required writing styles, such
as American Psychological Association
(APA), and other expectations, such as
double spacing, font size, and so forth.
Once purpose, scope, length, and writing
expectations are ascertained, you can
embark on conducting your search for
literature.
The Search
Searching for literature is quite easy
these days. Today, much information
is available electronically, and you can
obtain literature just about anytime and
anywhere. To begin the search, take ad-
vantage of library resources available to
you through your college or university.
Libraries often offer group or personal-
ized training in accessing information,
and librarians are often available to help
on specific topic assignments, as well. If
you are a student, you will be exposed
to search engines and databases such as
Social Work Abstracts and procedures for
accessing or requesting books, journal
articles, and reports that relate to your
topic.
Although information is also widely
available through the World Wide Web,
not every site offers credible informa-
tion. You can learn from your library
about criteria to evaluate the legitimacy
of information. One increasingly popular
source of information is Google Scholar
(www.googlescholar.com). This site has ac-
cess to professional journal lis.
Citation metrics versus peer review: Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Sc...Anne-Wil Harzing
Â
This presentations reports on a systematic and comprehensive comparison of the coverage of the three major bibliometric databases: Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science. Based on a sample of 146 senior academics in five broad disciplinary areas, we therefore provide both a longitudinal and a cross-disciplinary comparison of the three databases.
Our longitudinal comparison of eight data points between 2013 and 2015 shows a consistent and reasonably stable quarterly growth for both publications and citations across the three databases. This suggests that all three databases provide sufficient stability of coverage to be used for more detailed cross-disciplinary comparisons.
Our cross-disciplinary comparison of the three databases includes four key research metrics (publications, citations, h-index, and hI,annual, an annualised individual h-index) and five major disciplines (Humanities, Social Sciences, Engineering, Sciences and Life Sciences). We show that both the data source and the specific metrics used change the conclusions that can be drawn from cross-disciplinary comparisons.
Your Systematic Review: Getting StartedElaine Lasda
Â
Presentation for University at Albany- SUNY community related to best practices for conducting systematic reviews and other evidence synthesis practices.
Research Impact in Specialized Settings: 3 Case StudiesElaine Lasda
Â
Presentation of 3 case studies where research impact metrics are used to further the mission of institutions and organizations out of the traditional academic millieu.
Scholarly Metrics in Specialized SettingsElaine Lasda
Â
Presentation for the Bibliometric and Research Impact Community (BRIC) of Canada on case studies of research impact in specialized settings. Focus on Michigan Publishing by co-presenter Rebecca Welzenbach
Early Career Tactics to Increase Scholarly ImpactElaine Lasda
Â
Workshp for Ph.D. candidates, postdocs and faculy on how bilbiometrics, altmetrics, open access, ORCID, and other resources enable greater visibility of research output.
UAlbany Open Access Day Presentation on OER GrantElaine Lasda
Â
Ope Educational Resources or OERs improve student outcomes, learning objectives and retention. This is the collection of slides from my presentation with J. Slichko outlining the details of our incentivized worshops offered as a partnership between UAlbany IT Services and the Libraries, funded by a SUNY IITG grant.
Open Educational Resources Faculty WorkshopElaine Lasda
Â
Ope Educational Resources or OERs improve student outcomes, learning objectives and retention. This is the collection of slides from a workshop for University at Albany Faculty held on November 3, 2017 as part of a SUNY IITG grant-funded project.
Data and Libraries: How I learned to stop worrying and love the spreadsheetElaine Lasda
Â
Half-day workshop for academic, public, and special librarians on effective use of data in their libraries. Attendees learned to evaluate the quality and veracity of data, understand basic concepts related to data interpretation, and discuss key elements of effective visualization of data-based information.
Open Educational Resources (OERs): A Game Changer For Higher EdElaine Lasda
Â
Brief overview of open educational resources (OERs): the what, when and why of using them. Options for accessing, creating and modifying OERs. Potential roles for libraries, IT, faculty/professors, and students.
Poster Presentation for 4:am Altmetrics Conference, Toronto ON, CA and National Institutes of Health Bibliometrics and Assessment Conference, Bethesda MD, US
Getting "Fancy" With Your Library Data!Elaine Lasda
Â
Key considerations when developing data-driven actionable insights for reaching library stakeholders. Improve library services, understand library workflows, target resource acquisitions, make the library a better place through data analysis!
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
Â
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasnât one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
Â
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Â
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Â
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Operation âBlue Starâ is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
3. Why Bibliometric Analysis?
Factual evidence that scholarly output was useful/utilized by
others (with caveats)
Objective, not subjective (vs. surveys, reputation)
Popular methodology for LIS research
4. âIngredientsâ in a Bibliometric Study
⢠Research question with a possible bibliometric solution
⢠underrepresented/emerging/interdisciplinary fields
⢠institutional metrics (professional associations, countries, universities, etc.)
⢠Body of research from which to draw citations
⢠groups of scholars, specific journal titles, countries, universities, etc.
⢠date range
⢠cited or citing references?
⢠Analysis
⢠âcore collectionsâ /Bradfordâs Law
⢠subject scatter
⢠database indexing/overlap
⢠Insights gained
5. Article 1: Social Gerontology
Research questions:
(1)To what extent do social gerontology researchers rely on social science literature vs.
research from other disciplines? (i.e., WHAT SHOULD I BE BUYING FOR THESE SCHOLARS?!)
(2)What are the best databases to search for social gerontology research?
(3)To what degree do these findings demonstrate whether Social Gerontology is
âintegrativeâ in nature, and to what extent does social gerontology have its own
âterritoryâ [Winter, 1991]
(4) Is Social Gerontology a discipline in its own right?
6. Social Gerontology
⢠Corpus:
⢠randomized sample of cited refs in 3 key social gerontology journals 2005-
2009
⢠Database:
⢠Scopus (found mistakes - cited references in Age and Ageing!)
⢠Metadata added:
⢠OCLC subject headings, Ulrichâs database indexing information
⢠Analysis:
⢠subject scatter, database indexing, core titles in field
7. Social Gerontology
(1)Social gerontology researchers rely roughly upon half social science, half medical
literature in their research.
(2)The best databases for social gerontologists to search are broad multidisciplinary
(Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed) and not subject specific databases like Ageline or
Abstracts in Social Gerontology.
(3)Social gerontology is clearly integrative but there is clearly a small body of
periodicals that is unique in territorial scope to social gerontology.
(4)Is social gerontology its own distinct discipline? (maybe)
8. Article 2: Social Welfare
Research Questions:
(1)Which is the âbestâ resource for finding citing references to Social Work literature?
Scopus, Web of Science, or Google Scholar?
(2)How do the three databases differ in terms of general patterns of coverage; for
example: database overlap, languages covered, document types covered, etc.
(3)When is each resource most (or least) appropriate?
9. Social Welfare
⢠Corpus:
⢠Citing references to all 2005 articles appearing in the top 5 social work
journals from a âreputation approachâ article [Sellers, et al. , 2004]
⢠Databases:
⢠Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar
⢠Metadata added:
⢠document type, format, language
⢠Analysis:
⢠overlap (and lack thereof) between WoS, GS and Scopus, patterns of citing
reference coverage as a whole and by journal, variation in document types,
language distribution
10. Social Welfare
(1)What constitutes âthe bestâ depends on what is counted as a citing reference, and
what question is being asked of the data.
(2)Google Scholar did not return many more unique citations from peer reviewed
scholarly sources than were returned by proprietary databases.
(3)Other scholarly formats could be considered meaningful indications of research
productivity: conf proceedings, dissertations and theses, etc.
(4)For the most accurate measurement of impact, all three databases should be
utilized.
11. OA vs Paywall: an Impact Anecdote
Gerontology article:
cited 1 time in Scopus
not indexed in WoS
cited 1 time in GS
______________________
174 postprint downloads
from UAlbanyâs IR
Social Welfare article:
cited 5 times in Scopus
cited 5 times in WoS
cited 17 times in GS
_______________________
4 postprint downloads from
UAlbanyâs IR
12. So What? Who Cares?
⢠Bibliometrics continue to provide insights to researchers in LIS and other
disciplines [Harzing, 2015]
⢠Bibliometric methodologies are easier than ever to execute
⢠Dirty data is getting harder to find
⢠Expanded variety of impact metrics may lead to additional
questions/investigation instead of quick answers
⢠Understand. Educate. Interpret. Proceed with Caution.
13. References
Harzing, A.-W., & Alakangas, S. (2015). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary
comparison.Scientometrics, 1â18. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9
Lasda Bergman, E. M. (2011). Social GerontologyâIntegrative and Territorial Aspects: A Citation Analysis of Subject Scatter and Database
Coverage. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 30(3), 154â175. http://doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2011.592803
Lasda Bergman, E. M. (2012). Finding Citations to Social Work Literature: The Relative Benefits of Using Web of Science, Scopus, or Google
Scholar. The Journal of Academic Librarianship,38(6), 370â379. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.08.002
Winter, M. F. (1991). Specialization and interdisciplinary growth in the social sciences. Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian, 10(2), 1â7.
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25, 348-9.