This document summarizes a lecture about describing language input and assessing its impact on second language acquisition. It discusses various types of input including written, verbal, and non-linguistic input. Key concepts covered include Krashen's input hypothesis, the role of comprehensible input, types of input outside the classroom like motherese and foreigner talk, and the role of negotiation and interaction in facilitating language acquisition.
In this slideshow, we will learn about different perspectives regarding input in Second Language Acquisition. This is part of the applied linguistics seminar offered at Universidad del Valle.
In this slideshow, we will learn about different perspectives regarding input in Second Language Acquisition. This is part of the applied linguistics seminar offered at Universidad del Valle.
Presentación2.ppt input and interactionJoel Acosta
The primary factor affecting language acquisition appears to be the input that the learner receives. Stephen Krashen took a very strong position on the importance of input, asserting that comprehensible input is all that is necessary for second-language acquisition.
Conversational interaction in a second language forms the basis for the development of language rather than being only a forum for practice of specific language features. (Gass, 2003)
Demystifying Interlanguage Pragmatics for EFL TeachersOmaima Ayoub
This presentation defines Interlanguage Pragmatics (ILP), introduces key relevant concepts, and provides a flexible model of L2 pragmatic instruction that can minimize instances of pragmatic failure in intermediate and advanced learners' L2 production. This model aims to increase learners’ cognitive awareness and enhance their receptive and productive skills. This presentation was delivered on January, 24th 2017 at the NileTESOL 21st International Conference, Cairo, Egypt.
Pragmatics in the EFL classroom: An introductionJerry Talandis
Here are the slides from my presentation at the JALT 2013 national conference, in Kobe, Japan on October 27th. Here's the abstract:
If pragmatic competence is indeed a crucial part of successful communication (Murray, 2009), it follows that language learners need both instruction of pragmatic routines and awareness raising in order to achieve proficiency in a second language (Charlesbois, 2004). The field itself is quite broad, however, encompassing areas such as speech acts, discourse organization, sociolinguistics, and conversational structure, implicature, and management- all areas not traditionally addressed in language teaching curricula (Bardovi-Harlig & Mehan-Taylor, 2003). For English teachers in Japan largely unfamiliar with pragmatics yet interested in learning more, guidance is needed in exploring its many benefits for improving oral communication skills. This workshop will therefore aim to make pragmatics more accessible and practical by defining the field in lay terms, making a case for its inclusion within an oral communication curriculum for low-intermediate and above learners, and providing specific ideas on which aspects to focus upon and how to teach them. Participants will have an opportunity to experience and reflect on various activities that introduce, practice, and assess progress in building pragmatic competency. Space will also be included for participants to discuss their teaching contexts and exchange ideas on how to effectively introduce pragmatics to their students.
References:
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Mehan-Taylor, R. (2009). Teaching pragmatics. English Teaching Forum 2003(41:3).
Charlebois, J. (2004). Pragmatics: The heart and soul of linguistic proficiency. The Language Teacher, 28(4).
Murray, N. (2009). Rethinking pragmatics pragmatics for the classroom: A deductive approach. PAC7 at JALT2008 Conference Proceedings.
Presentation done by Jon Wright at the CLIL-Workshop in Catalonia 2011, at the Department of Education (Departament d'Ensenyament, Generalitat de catalunya,Barcelona 2011). organized by the Servei de Llengües estrangeres.
Presentación2.ppt input and interactionJoel Acosta
The primary factor affecting language acquisition appears to be the input that the learner receives. Stephen Krashen took a very strong position on the importance of input, asserting that comprehensible input is all that is necessary for second-language acquisition.
Conversational interaction in a second language forms the basis for the development of language rather than being only a forum for practice of specific language features. (Gass, 2003)
Demystifying Interlanguage Pragmatics for EFL TeachersOmaima Ayoub
This presentation defines Interlanguage Pragmatics (ILP), introduces key relevant concepts, and provides a flexible model of L2 pragmatic instruction that can minimize instances of pragmatic failure in intermediate and advanced learners' L2 production. This model aims to increase learners’ cognitive awareness and enhance their receptive and productive skills. This presentation was delivered on January, 24th 2017 at the NileTESOL 21st International Conference, Cairo, Egypt.
Pragmatics in the EFL classroom: An introductionJerry Talandis
Here are the slides from my presentation at the JALT 2013 national conference, in Kobe, Japan on October 27th. Here's the abstract:
If pragmatic competence is indeed a crucial part of successful communication (Murray, 2009), it follows that language learners need both instruction of pragmatic routines and awareness raising in order to achieve proficiency in a second language (Charlesbois, 2004). The field itself is quite broad, however, encompassing areas such as speech acts, discourse organization, sociolinguistics, and conversational structure, implicature, and management- all areas not traditionally addressed in language teaching curricula (Bardovi-Harlig & Mehan-Taylor, 2003). For English teachers in Japan largely unfamiliar with pragmatics yet interested in learning more, guidance is needed in exploring its many benefits for improving oral communication skills. This workshop will therefore aim to make pragmatics more accessible and practical by defining the field in lay terms, making a case for its inclusion within an oral communication curriculum for low-intermediate and above learners, and providing specific ideas on which aspects to focus upon and how to teach them. Participants will have an opportunity to experience and reflect on various activities that introduce, practice, and assess progress in building pragmatic competency. Space will also be included for participants to discuss their teaching contexts and exchange ideas on how to effectively introduce pragmatics to their students.
References:
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Mehan-Taylor, R. (2009). Teaching pragmatics. English Teaching Forum 2003(41:3).
Charlebois, J. (2004). Pragmatics: The heart and soul of linguistic proficiency. The Language Teacher, 28(4).
Murray, N. (2009). Rethinking pragmatics pragmatics for the classroom: A deductive approach. PAC7 at JALT2008 Conference Proceedings.
Presentation done by Jon Wright at the CLIL-Workshop in Catalonia 2011, at the Department of Education (Departament d'Ensenyament, Generalitat de catalunya,Barcelona 2011). organized by the Servei de Llengües estrangeres.
Which test of which english and why (1)TayyibaHanif
Which test of which English and why by Tayyiba Hanif and colleagues. It is a very important topic in World Englishes. This material help you a lot in understanding the topic. Thanks!
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxEduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher presents at the OECD webinar ‘Digital devices in schools: detrimental distraction or secret to success?’ on 27 May 2024. The presentation was based on findings from PISA 2022 results and the webinar helped launch the PISA in Focus ‘Managing screen time: How to protect and equip students against distraction’ https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/managing-screen-time_7c225af4-en and the OECD Education Policy Perspective ‘Students, digital devices and success’ can be found here - https://oe.cd/il/5yV
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology:
Ethnobotany in herbal drug evaluation,
Impact of Ethnobotany in traditional medicine,
New development in herbals,
Bio-prospecting tools for drug discovery,
Role of Ethnopharmacology in drug evaluation,
Reverse Pharmacology.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
1. Lecture 8
Describing Input &
Assessing its Impact on
Acquisition
BY
MELIA SARI
(06012681318022)
Lecturer: Dr. Dinar Sitinjak, M.A
Machdalena Vianty, M.Ed., M.Pd.,Ed.D
2. OUTLINES
• What is input?
• Input on Language Learning Outside the
Classroom
• Motherese
• Foreigner Talk
• The Role of Input in SLA; Krashen
Hypotheses
• More on Input- Negotiation & Interaction
10/25/2013
Melia sari (06012681318022)
2
3. What is input?
Something is put
in
Individual hears or
receives from which he
or she can learn
Language addressed to
the learner by native
speakers or other L2
learners (Ellis,1985)
10/25/2013
Melia sari (06012681318022)
3
4. Types of Input
Conscious and unconscious
(Wang, 2010)
Three forms of input: written,
verbal and non-linguistic
Output of teacher is input for
students
Output of students is input for
teacher
Interaction is another type of
input
Output : the outcome of what the
10/25/2013
Melia
students/people have learned sari (06012681318022)
4
5. The role of acquisition& learning ; 5
hypotheses(Krashen,1981,1982)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
The acquisition/learning hypothesis
adults have 2 distinct &independent ways of developing
competence in L2.
The natural order hypothesis
The acquisition of grammatical structures proceeds in a
predictable order
The monitor hypothesis
learning has only one function, namely as a monitor or editor
The input hypothesis
Humans acquire language in only one way-by understanding
messages/ by receiving „comprehensible input‟.
The affective filter hypothesis
Affective factor can play a negative role in LA.
10/25/2013
Melia sari (06012681318022)
5
7. Krashen Input Hypothesis
Humans acquire language by
Understanding messages or receiving
comprehensible input
Understanding language that contains structure
When communication / input is understood, (i + 1) will
provide automatically
Production ability emerges. It’s not taught directly
10/25/2013
Melia sari (06012681318022)
7
8. Input & Language Learning
Outside the Classroom
Foreigner
Talk
Motherese
10/25/2013
Melia sari (06012681318022)
8
9. MOTHERESE
Motherese : how mother talked to their children/ The
natural way that a parent communicates with a baby or
young child.
Features of motherese:
– Clear articulation
– Marked intonational contours
– Lexical adjustment/negotiations
– Grammatical well-formedness
– Limited ranged of grammatical relations
– Absence of coordination
– Repetitions
– Checks and uptakers
– Tutorial questions
– High redundancy
10/25/2013
Melia sari (06012681318022)
– Topic concerns the here-and-now
9
10. • Feedback in L1 Acquisition. Some corrective data
Child : l like this candy. I like they.
Adult : you like them?
Child : yes, I like they.
Corrective feedback is
sometimes waste of time.
Adult : say them
If parents give feedback at all, it
is on the CONTENT of what
Child : them.
their children say, rather than
Adult : say I like them.
on the FORM in which they said
it.
Child : I like them.
Adult : Good.
Child : I‟m good. These candy good too.
Adult : are they good too?
Child : Yes I like they. You like they?
10/25/2013
Melia sari (06012681318022)
10
11. Some rules for feedback L1
acquisition
Self
correction
A non
standard
utterance
Corrective
feedback
Interactional
Feedback
10/25/2013
Melia sari (06012681318022)
11
12. Some rules for feedback in L1
acquisition
• Dialog 1 (interactional feedback)
C : I have a book good, daddy.
A : a good book is it?
C : Yes, I have a good book.
A : I see.
•
M
V
M
Dialog 2 (Self correction)
: No daddy, me not hungry.
: you‟re not hungry?
: No, I‟m not daddy.
10/25/2013
dialog 3 (Corrective feedback)
M : They want to go down the
/Eeee/
W : Want to go the beach, do
They?
M : No, they want to go down
the /eee/
W : To the beach?
M : (She points out of the window)
W : Oh down the street.
Melia sari (06012681318022)
12
13. Foreigner talked
The language used by native
speakers while addressing nonnative speakers
Types of
Foreigner
talked
Interactional
adjustment
Interactional &
Grammatical
input
adjustment
10/25/2013
Melia sari (06012681318022)
Both
grammatical &
ungrammatica
l adjustment
13
14. The function of foreigner talked
• To promote communication
• To establish a relationship between the native speaker & non-native
speaker
• It serves as an implicit teaching mode.
-
The use of ungrammatical foreigner talked depends on 4 conditions:
The native speaker has very low proficiency in the L2.
The native speaker thinks he is of higher status.
The native speaker has considerable prior experience off foreigner
talked.
The conversation occurs spontaneously. (Hatch in Ellis,1985)
10/25/2013
Melia sari (06012681318022)
14
15. Lecture 9 :more on input,
negotiation & interaction
Negotiation
A major feature of conversation involving L2 Learners
where native speaker strive to solve the communicative
difficulties which are likely to arise as a result of learner‟s
limited L2 resources (Ellis,1985:141-142)
How to negotiate : use strategies and tactics
Device for
repairing
trouble
Selecting
salient
topic
Checking
comprehension
10/25/2013
Conversatio
nal device to
Avoid
Melia sari (06012681318022)
trouble
Topic
switching, clarificatio
n, using a slow pace
(step), repeating
utterances, stressing
key words
15
16. Negotiation of meaning & language acquisition
(taken from Long 1985)
Talk involving
informationexchange
Learner gives
feedback on
comprehension
Comprehensibl
e input
10/25/2013
Melia sari (06012681318022)
Negotiated
conversational
modification
Language
acquisition
16
17. From input to interaction: selected
aspects of Classroom Talk
• Metalinguistic input : explicit information about
regularities of the target language (the level of
phonology, morphology, social usage). Unusual
word also counts of MI.
• Focussed input : learner‟sattention is focused on
some features of target language.
• Scaffolded input : teacher or other learners help
an individual learner to say what he/she wants to
say.
• Evaluative input : to mean feedback, correction
10/25/2013
Melia sari (06012681318022)
17
or repair.
18. REFERENCES
Ellis, R . 1985. Understanding Second Language
Oxford: Blackwell Publishers
Ltd.
Acquisition.
Edmondson, W. 1999. Twelve Lectures on Second
Tubingen: Gunter Narr Verlag Tubingen.
Language
Oxford.
acquisition.
Easterbrooks, S. 2006. Motherese/Fatherese “ Food for Baby‟s Thought”.
Georgia State University.
Escobar, D. 2012. Input, Interaction, Foreigner and Teacher Talk. Refublica
Bolivariana De Venezuela. Institudo Pedagogaco De Caracas.
Neardy, N.& Bandith, P. 2010. The Role of L2 Input In
Second
Language Acquisition / Learning.
English Department: Institute of
Foreign
Language,
Quintero, M. & Acosta, J. 2012. Input &Interaction Foreigner/ Teacher Talk
Error Analysis. Linguistic Seminar
18