The document discusses language course design, focusing on content definition and sequencing. It outlines various approaches to syllabus design, such as structural, functional, and notional syllabi, and emphasizes the importance of learner needs analysis in content selection. Additionally, it explores sequencing methods like linear, spiral, and matrix, supported by references to key research in the field.
Introduction to language course design focusing on content definition and sequencing.
Review of different syllabi types discussed in previous class, exploring their main characteristics.
Definition of content in language courses as knowledge units and the importance of context.
Details on a structural syllabus example, objectives, and dependency on course goals.
Introduction to content sequencing and analysis through textbook evaluation.
Identification of contexts, communicative events, goals, and linguistic elements in language learning.
Key assumptions of synthetic syllabi, including linear presentation of language and performance norms.Overview of unit progression variability in courses and different sequencing methods: linear, spiral, matrix.Detailed explanation of three sequencing approaches including linear, spiral, and matrix methods.
List of references used in the presentation highlighting key authors and works on syllabus design.
In content basedinstruction…
Knowledge from content areas
(math, science, history, etc.) through which
language is taught and practiced.
Content
9.
Structural syllabus
Objective =students will be able to produce orally
grammatically correct affirmative sentences in the
present perfect.
Contents=
The present perfect
Third person present form of have (has)
Verbs in past participle
Irregular verbs in past participle
An Example
Take a lookat the table of contents or the
«scope and sequence» of some English
textbooks.
1. How is content defined?
2. What is the underlying criterion for
sequence?
3. How would you classify each book in terms of
its syllabus?
Getting started
1. Identify thegeneral contexts and situations in
which the learners will communicate.
2. Specify the communicative events the learners
will engage in.
3. Make a list of the functional goals that the
learner will need in order to take part in the
communicative events.
4. List the key linguistic elements needed to
achieve functional goals.
5. Sequence and integrate 3 and 4.
Nunan, 2001
p. 63
16.
1. contexts andsituations
2. communicative events
3. functional goals
4. linguistic elements
Nunan, 2001
5
Long & Crookes,1992
Synthetic syllabus assume…
• Linear presentation of language item results in
acquisition.
• Native-like performance as a norm for
assessment.
• Synthesis of isolated items as the key
underlying acquisition process.
19.
Long & Crookes,1992
Synthetic syllabus assume…
• Linear presentation of language item results in
acquisition.
• Native-like performance as a norm for
assessment.
• Synthesis of isolated items as the key
underlying acquisition process.
Nation and Macalister,2010
• The units of progression may vary from course
to course.
• Whatever unit of progression chosen, course
designers need to check other units are also
covered and dealt with within the appropriate
level for the student.
Nation and Macalister,2010
Language areas Research based suggested criteria
Vocabulary West’s General Sevice
List, Coxhead’s Academic list
Grammar Georges’ Verb form frequency
counts
Functions Van Ek notional syllabus
Council of Europe’s list of functions
27.
Nation and Macalister,2010
Language areas Research based suggested criteria
Discourse Biber’s work on co-occurrence
Swales textual genre categories*
Skills/sub-skills Skill taxonomies (Brown’s or
Richards’). Cognitive
taxonomies (Bloom) or
strategy inventories (Oxford)
Ideas Ideas relevant to the course for
their value to motivate
learners, familiarity and
encouragement of language use.
28.
Nation and Macalister,2010
Once units of progression have been
determined, the sequencing might take one of
these three approaches:
• Linear
• Spiral
• Matrix
References
• Long, M.& Crookes, G. (1992). Three Approaches to
Task-Based Syllabus Design. TESOL Quarterly, Vol.
26, No. 1. pp. 27-56.
• Nation, I.S.P. and Macalister, J. (2010). Language
Curriculum Design. New York: Routledge.
• Nunan, D. (2001). Syllabus design. En M. Celce-
Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or
foreign language (3º ed., pp. 55-65). Boston, MA:
Heinle & Heinle.