This is a joint presentation by Jeroen Bosman and Bianca Kramer, given during a joint NISO-ICSTI webinar, held on Wednesday, October 26, on Enabling Innovation in Researcher Workflow and Scholarly Communication.
This document provides instructions for citing sources and creating bibliographies in Microsoft Word. It explains how to insert citations, manage sources by adding and editing them, choose a bibliography style such as APA or MLA, and generate a bibliography from the citations and sources in a document. Creating a bibliography requires having at least one citation and corresponding source entry.
This document discusses referencing styles and provides guidance on citing sources. It defines referencing and citing, and distinguishes between references and bibliographies. Reasons for referencing include acknowledging others' work, allowing readers to find sources, avoiding plagiarism, and adding credibility. The document reviews several referencing styles including APA, Chicago, and MLA styles. It provides examples of how to reference different source types such as books, journal articles, and websites. Referencing tools that can help manage citations are also introduced.
This document summarizes a presentation on research proposals, report writing, and promoting research among academicians. The presentation covers reasons for retracting Indian scientific publications, key factors for accepting manuscripts, the structure of research reports and grant proposals, and tools for research report writing. It discusses the components of a scientific research report such as the introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections. It also provides examples of research report structure and describes various tools that can help with writing, editing, data analysis, and identifying journals.
This document provides definitions and explanations of key terminology related to journals. It defines what a journal is, discusses different types of journals including academic, trade, current affairs, popular and newspapers. It also explains concepts like volume and issue, types of publications, ISSN, editorial boards, frequency of publication, peer review, double blind review, abstracts, title pages, indexed and impact factor of journals, review articles, open access journals, and copyright.
Este documento fornece instruções para unificar perfis em Scopus. Ele descreve os passos para fazer login usando o e-mail da USP, digitar o sobrenome e nome, selecionar os nomes correspondentes, escolher o nome preferencial, verificar a produção científica, unificar perfis e buscar ajuda de um bibliotecário se necessário.
Predatory journals prioritize self-interest over scholarship. They do not conduct proper peer review and instead offer quick publication for a fee without editing. In contrast, legitimate open access journals maintain high standards. It is important to check if a journal is indexed in reputable databases like DOAJ or has an impact factor from JCR. Potential predatory journals can be identified using lists from Beall's or Cabell's. Librarians can help determine if a journal is predatory by investigating the publisher, editorial board, and review process.
Defining the h index and the calculation process. Also the main advantages and limitations besides how to increasing the h index.
Dr. Hassan Najman MUHAMED
hassan.muhamed@uod.ac
The University of Duhok - Kurdistan region of Iraq
This document provides instructions for citing sources and creating bibliographies in Microsoft Word. It explains how to insert citations, manage sources by adding and editing them, choose a bibliography style such as APA or MLA, and generate a bibliography from the citations and sources in a document. Creating a bibliography requires having at least one citation and corresponding source entry.
This document discusses referencing styles and provides guidance on citing sources. It defines referencing and citing, and distinguishes between references and bibliographies. Reasons for referencing include acknowledging others' work, allowing readers to find sources, avoiding plagiarism, and adding credibility. The document reviews several referencing styles including APA, Chicago, and MLA styles. It provides examples of how to reference different source types such as books, journal articles, and websites. Referencing tools that can help manage citations are also introduced.
This document summarizes a presentation on research proposals, report writing, and promoting research among academicians. The presentation covers reasons for retracting Indian scientific publications, key factors for accepting manuscripts, the structure of research reports and grant proposals, and tools for research report writing. It discusses the components of a scientific research report such as the introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections. It also provides examples of research report structure and describes various tools that can help with writing, editing, data analysis, and identifying journals.
This document provides definitions and explanations of key terminology related to journals. It defines what a journal is, discusses different types of journals including academic, trade, current affairs, popular and newspapers. It also explains concepts like volume and issue, types of publications, ISSN, editorial boards, frequency of publication, peer review, double blind review, abstracts, title pages, indexed and impact factor of journals, review articles, open access journals, and copyright.
Este documento fornece instruções para unificar perfis em Scopus. Ele descreve os passos para fazer login usando o e-mail da USP, digitar o sobrenome e nome, selecionar os nomes correspondentes, escolher o nome preferencial, verificar a produção científica, unificar perfis e buscar ajuda de um bibliotecário se necessário.
Predatory journals prioritize self-interest over scholarship. They do not conduct proper peer review and instead offer quick publication for a fee without editing. In contrast, legitimate open access journals maintain high standards. It is important to check if a journal is indexed in reputable databases like DOAJ or has an impact factor from JCR. Potential predatory journals can be identified using lists from Beall's or Cabell's. Librarians can help determine if a journal is predatory by investigating the publisher, editorial board, and review process.
Defining the h index and the calculation process. Also the main advantages and limitations besides how to increasing the h index.
Dr. Hassan Najman MUHAMED
hassan.muhamed@uod.ac
The University of Duhok - Kurdistan region of Iraq
The document provides an overview of the Vancouver referencing style in 3 parts. It discusses that Vancouver style uses consecutive numbers for in-text citations and a numbered reference list. The reference list includes bibliographic details of sources cited arranged in numerical order. Examples are provided for formatting references to journal articles, books, newspaper articles, electronic sources, and more according to Vancouver style guidelines.
Research metrics are quantitative analyses used to assess the quality, impact, and influence of scholarly research outputs. Key metrics include journal impact factors, author metrics, article metrics, and altmetrics. Journal impact factors are calculated based on the number of citations a journal's articles receive. Author metrics measure researcher impact and productivity. Article metrics track citations of individual works. Altmetrics provide broader measures of online attention and impact.
The manuscript writing process for medical writersPaul Giles, PhD
This slide presentation outlines the logical order of steps to be taken when writing a manuscript for a peer-reviewed journal as a medical writer in a communications team, writing on behalf of a client. Reference is made to industry guidelines, requirements and standards.
Digital strategies to find the right journal for publishing your researchSC CTSI at USC and CHLA
Date: Apr 3, 2019
Speaker: Duncan Nicholas, Former Development Editor at international academic publisher Taylor and Francis Group, and now Director of DN Journals research publishing consultancy, and Senior Consultant for Enago Academy.
Overview: This webinar will provide an overview of digital tools and initiatives that help researchers select the right journal for their manuscript to ensure the best chance of article acceptance.
The document provides guidance on how to conduct literary research and write a research paper. It recommends starting with a focused research question and doing general research to understand available resources. The paper should show what others have said about the topic and present the writer's own perspective. Academic sources like books and articles are most appropriate to cite. Taking notes and drafting a works cited page from the beginning is advised. The document includes tips on revising, using evidence, and following assignment guidelines.
h index: Benchmark of productivity and impact of researcher AJAY SEMALTY
In the Indices of research series h index is discussed here. The h-index (sometimes called the Hirsch index or Hirsch number) is one of the several research indices which is used to measure the productivity and impact of of a researcher/ research group/ institution. It’s an index which increases on the basis of citations and number of papers continuously with the passage of time. It is the major benchmark used by the employers for selection/recruitment and/ or assessment of Researchers. This e-module will let you know all about the h index: What, How, Who, why......about h index will be answered here. In the very next video we will cover how to identify h index of a researcher in various platforms. (URL link for video: https://youtu.be/BAhPzxWVtVE) For any query please feel free to write to us at openknowledgeok@gmail.com and please do subscribe our youtube channel.......THANKS FOR GIVING YOUR TIME. --- Team OK
Workshop Part 2: Publication Ethics for Biomedical Researchers (BioMed Centra...balaram_biomedcentral
The second presentation in the 2015 BioMed Central author workshop presented at institutions in Brazil.
In this segment, Dr. Maria Kowalczuk, Biology Editor, shares information on research ethics and publication ethics, drawing from her experience as a member of the BioMed Central Research Integrity Group.
This document provides guidance on how to read and understand a research article. It explains that a research article reports on original research results through standard sections - an abstract, introduction, literature review, research question, methods, results, discussion and references. It describes the purpose and contents of each section, emphasizing that a research article contributes new knowledge through original experimental work rather than summarizing existing research. Contact information is provided for library assistance in analyzing and applying research articles.
This presentation is useful for all who are preparing their projects in colleges. This presentation helps you in giving proper reference of data source.
The document provides an overview of how to conduct a systematic search to identify relevant research for a systematic review. It discusses developing a clear research question, selecting appropriate databases and sources, developing a search strategy using subject headings and keywords, applying limits and screens, and exporting references to a citation manager. Tips are provided for developing an effective search strategy, applying it across multiple databases, and identifying additional relevant studies through other methods like hand searching. Contact information is given for experts available to help with the systematic search process.
This document provides instruction on using MLA citation style. It begins by defining plagiarism and explaining the importance of citation styles in avoiding plagiarism. It then details the key components of MLA style, including in-text citations and bibliographic entries. Examples are provided for different source types such as books, articles, and websites. The document emphasizes correctly citing sources within the text and providing a Works Cited list to give credit to authors and avoid plagiarism. Practice examples are included to reinforce the proper formatting of in-text citations and bibliographic entries using MLA style.
NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, STATISTICAL
ANALYSIS AND STRESS MANAGEMENT
Organized by: - Panjab University Campus Students Council (PUCSC) in Collaboration With
Centre for Public Health, Panjab University, Chandigarh
This document discusses web decay, which refers to web sources disappearing over time. It provides statistics on the percentage of decayed web citations in various studies. While web sources are commonly cited in scholarly works, their URLs can become invalid if the sites change or are removed. The Wayback Machine and other archives can help recover some decayed sources. When citing web sources, authors should check URLs work and consider archiving pages themselves to mitigate decay issues.
The document discusses researcher identities and profiles. It defines the h-index and how it is calculated. It emphasizes setting up profiles in ORCID, Google Scholar, Scopus, and ResearcherID to distinguish researchers from others with similar names and group all of their publications together. These profiles improve discoverability and metrics like citation counts. The document provides instructions on setting up ORCID and Google Scholar profiles.
Predatory publishing: what it is and how to avoid itUQSCADS
There are currently approximately 28,000 journals publishing 1.5 million papers annually. Although the majority of new journals are legitimate, the credentials of some are questionable. Such journals and publishers are referred to as 'predatory'. They commonly send spam emails to potential authors, solicit submissions and request payment of article processing charges, but lack academic rigor or credibility.
This presentation provides researchers with
an insight into predatory behaviors and and how they can avoid them.
The document defines the impact factor as the average number of times articles from a journal published in the past two years have been cited in the current year's Journal Citation Reports. It explains that journals with high impact factors are cited frequently in other journals' references and citations. It provides instructions for finding the impact factor of a specific journal using the ISI Web of Knowledge database and Journal Citation Reports, which can be sorted by impact factor and other metrics like total citations and immediacy index.
Systematic Reviews in the Health SciencesBecky Morin
This document provides an overview of systematic reviews, including what they are, why they are important in health sciences research, and the steps involved in conducting one. It defines a systematic review as a comprehensive study that collects and analyzes data from multiple research studies to answer a specific question. It notes that systematic reviews use explicit and rigorous methods to minimize bias and provide reliable conclusions. The key steps outlined include developing a protocol and research question, conducting comprehensive searches, selecting and assessing studies, extracting and synthesizing data, and disseminating findings.
This presentation was provided by Alex Viggio of the University of Colorado-Boulder during the joint NISO-ICSTI webinar, Enabling Innovation in Researcher Workflow and Scholarly Communication, held on October 26, 2016.
This presentation was provided by Cameron Neylon of Curtin University during the joint NISO-ICSTI webinar, Enabling Innovation in Researcher Workflow and Scholarly Communication, held on October 26, 2016.
The document provides an overview of the Vancouver referencing style in 3 parts. It discusses that Vancouver style uses consecutive numbers for in-text citations and a numbered reference list. The reference list includes bibliographic details of sources cited arranged in numerical order. Examples are provided for formatting references to journal articles, books, newspaper articles, electronic sources, and more according to Vancouver style guidelines.
Research metrics are quantitative analyses used to assess the quality, impact, and influence of scholarly research outputs. Key metrics include journal impact factors, author metrics, article metrics, and altmetrics. Journal impact factors are calculated based on the number of citations a journal's articles receive. Author metrics measure researcher impact and productivity. Article metrics track citations of individual works. Altmetrics provide broader measures of online attention and impact.
The manuscript writing process for medical writersPaul Giles, PhD
This slide presentation outlines the logical order of steps to be taken when writing a manuscript for a peer-reviewed journal as a medical writer in a communications team, writing on behalf of a client. Reference is made to industry guidelines, requirements and standards.
Digital strategies to find the right journal for publishing your researchSC CTSI at USC and CHLA
Date: Apr 3, 2019
Speaker: Duncan Nicholas, Former Development Editor at international academic publisher Taylor and Francis Group, and now Director of DN Journals research publishing consultancy, and Senior Consultant for Enago Academy.
Overview: This webinar will provide an overview of digital tools and initiatives that help researchers select the right journal for their manuscript to ensure the best chance of article acceptance.
The document provides guidance on how to conduct literary research and write a research paper. It recommends starting with a focused research question and doing general research to understand available resources. The paper should show what others have said about the topic and present the writer's own perspective. Academic sources like books and articles are most appropriate to cite. Taking notes and drafting a works cited page from the beginning is advised. The document includes tips on revising, using evidence, and following assignment guidelines.
h index: Benchmark of productivity and impact of researcher AJAY SEMALTY
In the Indices of research series h index is discussed here. The h-index (sometimes called the Hirsch index or Hirsch number) is one of the several research indices which is used to measure the productivity and impact of of a researcher/ research group/ institution. It’s an index which increases on the basis of citations and number of papers continuously with the passage of time. It is the major benchmark used by the employers for selection/recruitment and/ or assessment of Researchers. This e-module will let you know all about the h index: What, How, Who, why......about h index will be answered here. In the very next video we will cover how to identify h index of a researcher in various platforms. (URL link for video: https://youtu.be/BAhPzxWVtVE) For any query please feel free to write to us at openknowledgeok@gmail.com and please do subscribe our youtube channel.......THANKS FOR GIVING YOUR TIME. --- Team OK
Workshop Part 2: Publication Ethics for Biomedical Researchers (BioMed Centra...balaram_biomedcentral
The second presentation in the 2015 BioMed Central author workshop presented at institutions in Brazil.
In this segment, Dr. Maria Kowalczuk, Biology Editor, shares information on research ethics and publication ethics, drawing from her experience as a member of the BioMed Central Research Integrity Group.
This document provides guidance on how to read and understand a research article. It explains that a research article reports on original research results through standard sections - an abstract, introduction, literature review, research question, methods, results, discussion and references. It describes the purpose and contents of each section, emphasizing that a research article contributes new knowledge through original experimental work rather than summarizing existing research. Contact information is provided for library assistance in analyzing and applying research articles.
This presentation is useful for all who are preparing their projects in colleges. This presentation helps you in giving proper reference of data source.
The document provides an overview of how to conduct a systematic search to identify relevant research for a systematic review. It discusses developing a clear research question, selecting appropriate databases and sources, developing a search strategy using subject headings and keywords, applying limits and screens, and exporting references to a citation manager. Tips are provided for developing an effective search strategy, applying it across multiple databases, and identifying additional relevant studies through other methods like hand searching. Contact information is given for experts available to help with the systematic search process.
This document provides instruction on using MLA citation style. It begins by defining plagiarism and explaining the importance of citation styles in avoiding plagiarism. It then details the key components of MLA style, including in-text citations and bibliographic entries. Examples are provided for different source types such as books, articles, and websites. The document emphasizes correctly citing sources within the text and providing a Works Cited list to give credit to authors and avoid plagiarism. Practice examples are included to reinforce the proper formatting of in-text citations and bibliographic entries using MLA style.
NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, STATISTICAL
ANALYSIS AND STRESS MANAGEMENT
Organized by: - Panjab University Campus Students Council (PUCSC) in Collaboration With
Centre for Public Health, Panjab University, Chandigarh
This document discusses web decay, which refers to web sources disappearing over time. It provides statistics on the percentage of decayed web citations in various studies. While web sources are commonly cited in scholarly works, their URLs can become invalid if the sites change or are removed. The Wayback Machine and other archives can help recover some decayed sources. When citing web sources, authors should check URLs work and consider archiving pages themselves to mitigate decay issues.
The document discusses researcher identities and profiles. It defines the h-index and how it is calculated. It emphasizes setting up profiles in ORCID, Google Scholar, Scopus, and ResearcherID to distinguish researchers from others with similar names and group all of their publications together. These profiles improve discoverability and metrics like citation counts. The document provides instructions on setting up ORCID and Google Scholar profiles.
Predatory publishing: what it is and how to avoid itUQSCADS
There are currently approximately 28,000 journals publishing 1.5 million papers annually. Although the majority of new journals are legitimate, the credentials of some are questionable. Such journals and publishers are referred to as 'predatory'. They commonly send spam emails to potential authors, solicit submissions and request payment of article processing charges, but lack academic rigor or credibility.
This presentation provides researchers with
an insight into predatory behaviors and and how they can avoid them.
The document defines the impact factor as the average number of times articles from a journal published in the past two years have been cited in the current year's Journal Citation Reports. It explains that journals with high impact factors are cited frequently in other journals' references and citations. It provides instructions for finding the impact factor of a specific journal using the ISI Web of Knowledge database and Journal Citation Reports, which can be sorted by impact factor and other metrics like total citations and immediacy index.
Systematic Reviews in the Health SciencesBecky Morin
This document provides an overview of systematic reviews, including what they are, why they are important in health sciences research, and the steps involved in conducting one. It defines a systematic review as a comprehensive study that collects and analyzes data from multiple research studies to answer a specific question. It notes that systematic reviews use explicit and rigorous methods to minimize bias and provide reliable conclusions. The key steps outlined include developing a protocol and research question, conducting comprehensive searches, selecting and assessing studies, extracting and synthesizing data, and disseminating findings.
This presentation was provided by Alex Viggio of the University of Colorado-Boulder during the joint NISO-ICSTI webinar, Enabling Innovation in Researcher Workflow and Scholarly Communication, held on October 26, 2016.
This presentation was provided by Cameron Neylon of Curtin University during the joint NISO-ICSTI webinar, Enabling Innovation in Researcher Workflow and Scholarly Communication, held on October 26, 2016.
This presentation was given by David Mellor of the Center for Open Science during the joint NISO-ICSTI event held on October 26, 2016 on the topic of enabling innovation in researcher workflow and scholarly communication.
This presentation was provided by Pamela Shaw of Northwestern University during the NISO Webinar, Compliance with Funder Mandates, held on September 14, 2016
This was a joint presentation provided by Jeff Broadbent and Betty Rozum of Utah State University during a NISO webinar on Compliance with Funder Mandates, held on September 16, 2016.
This presentation was provided by Sarah Young of Cornell University during a NISO webinar on the topic of Compliance With Funder mandates, held on September 14, 2016.
This talk was provided by publishing consultant, Maureen C. Kelly, during the NISO webinar, What Can I Do with This? Making It Easy for Scholars & Researchers to Utilize Content, held on January 11, 2017.
This talk was given by Darla Henderson of the American Chemical Society during the NISO webinar, What Can I Do with This? Making It Easy for Scholars & Researchers to Utilize Content, held on January 11, 2017.
This talk was provided by Howard Ratner of CHORUS during the NISO webinar, What Can I Do with This? Making It Easy for Scholars & Researchers to Utilize Content, held on January 11, 2017.
Support When It Counts - library roles in public access to federally-funded r...Hilary Davis
Charleston Conference 2013
November 8, 2013
Kristine M. Alpi, Director, William Rand Kenan, Jr. Library of Veterinary Medicine, kmalpi@ncsu.edu
William M. Cross, Director, Copyright and Digital Scholarship, NCSU Libraries, wmcross@ncsu.edu
Hilary M. Davis, Interim Head, Collection Management & Director of Research Data Services, NCSU Libraries, hmdavis4@ncsu.edu
In November 2012, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) said it would begin enforcing its earlier April 2008 public access mandate to NIH-funded research by delaying processing of investigators’ grants. In response, the NCSU Libraries offered to assist the university’s sponsored research office in supporting NC State researchers who had publications stemming from NIH funding and had not achieved compliance. Since the 2008 NIH mandate, over 1000 articles based on NIH-funding have been published by NC State across research areas including veterinary medicine, life sciences, physical sciences, social sciences, engineering, textiles, design, math and statistics. Many were published in journals which did not automatically deposit papers to meet NIH requirements. Although familiar with biomedical literature, author agreements and open access, we did not fully grasp the complex web of investigator, author, publisher, institution and funder relations involved in this mandate until we were deeply engaged in the process and gained access to the compliance monitoring data.
In this paper, we will discuss the costs and benefits of library support for authors needing to attain compliance with an eye toward how this support may be scaled up if other federal funding agencies follow suit. We will share practical strategies for supporting compliance efforts for individual researchers and at the campus-wide level, as well as training newly-funded researchers to facilitate future compliance. We discuss the advantages of leveraging existing relationships with publishers to help their researchers, strategies for getting involved in compliance support, and insights on how to skill-up and scale-up when engaging in this part of the research process.
This presentation was provided by Micah Altman of MIT during the August 10 NISO webinar, How Libraries Use, Support and Can Implement Researcher Identifiers
This presentation was provided by William Cross, Madison Sullivan, and Eka Grguric of NCSU during the Aug 10 NISO-NASIG webinar, How Libraries Use, Support and Can Implement Researcher Identifiers.
1. The document summarizes a presentation on the RA21 (Resource Access in the 21st Century) Task Force, which aims to address challenges with the current IP-based system for accessing scholarly resources and propose new solutions.
2. It outlines problems with the current system such as inconsistent user experiences for off-campus access and discusses the task force's work to date including developing draft principles and plans to test solutions through pilot programs in 2017.
3. Stakeholders are encouraged to get involved by taking a survey or expressing interest in participating in pilots to help develop best practices for improved access systems beyond IP authentication.
This is a joint presentation provided by Doug Goans and Chris Helms of the Georgia Tech Library during the first segment of a NISO webinar, Digital Security: Securing Library Systems, held on November 9, 2016.
This talk was provided by Blake Carver of LYRASIS during the NISO Webinar, Digital Security: Securing Library Systems, held on Wednesday, November 9, 2016
Presentation by Todd Carpenter and Nettie Lagace of NISO's Altmetrics Recommended Practice Outputs, delivered to the Charleston Library Conference on November 4, 2016
Todd Carpenter discusses access control and identity management across different organizations and institutions. He questions whether barriers are more technical or social in nature. There are many ongoing identity management efforts but challenges remain in ensuring different groups interact effectively. Sustainability over the long term requires continued collaboration to develop best practices and make solutions workable for all.
This presentation was provided by Merri Beth Lavagnino of Indiana University during the NISO Webinar, Digital Security: Protecting Library Resources From Piracy, held on November 16, 2016.
Ralph Youngen presentation entitle Evolving Identity & Access Management at ACS given at a Briefing session at the Coalition for Network Information (CNI) fall meeting in Washington DC on 12/13/16
The good, the efficient and the open - changing research workflows and the ne...Bianca Kramer
presented at the Geneva Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), Geneva, June 18, 2015
Science is in transition. If all goes well, the transition is towards more open, efficient and honest/reproducible practices. Libraries should move with this change by supporting open science instead of just open access. Building on their successful project "101 innovations in scholarly communication" Jeroen Bosman and Bianca Kramer present their interpretations of what is going on and can be expected in the six phases of the research cycle. They have tested their hypothetical workflows and show how real, day-to-day research workflows are changing from traditional to modern, innovative and experimental. These changes are reflected in tools and sites people use in various phases of that workflow. They might for example change from Web of Science → SPSS → Word+Endnote → Nature → ResearcherID → Impact Factors to Sparrho → ROpenScience+IPythonNotebooks → WriteLateX+Docear → The Winnower → Kudos → Publons+PubPeer. The way new generations of researchers work affects how information will be discovered, re-used, created, shared, communicated and assessed. There are huge opportunities for libraries and other stakeholders to contribute and work with the research community, but only if they are well prepared!
The good, the efficient and the open: changing research workflows and the nee...hierohiero
This document discusses changing research workflows and the need to transition from open access to open science. It presents several models of the research workflow as multi-cyclic and multi-ordered, with loops for activities like grant writing, experimentation, and publishing. The document outlines three goals for science: being good, efficient, and open. It then analyzes survey data on tools researchers use at different stages of the workflow and how they align with open science principles. The findings suggest a shift towards more open tools and formats.
Small steps-big-opportunities-brussels-open-access-week-2015-kramer-bosman sl...Bianca Kramer
This document discusses moving from an open access model to an open science model for research. It presents increasingly complex models of the research workflow, showing how it is nonlinear and iterative. It identifies goals for open science around transparency, reproducibility and quality. It also discusses tools and platforms for open scholarly communication and survey results about researcher profiles and altmetrics. The key message is that research must transition from the current publisher-centered system to a more decentralized, open and publicly-funded model of self-regulation to better support open science.
WEB&Z - 101 Innovations in Scholarly CommunicationBianca Kramer
The document discusses models of the research workflow and how it has evolved from a simple linear model to a more complex multi-cyclic model with loops representing iterations in the research process like grant writing, experimentation, and revising manuscripts. It also discusses goals for open science in terms of transparency, reproducibility and credit. Libraries can support changing research workflows by analyzing and comparing tools, presenting information to researchers, and advising on licensing and other decisions while considering researchers' perspectives.
With the progress towards open science, scientific communication is facing a new wave of innovations towards more openness and speed of research publication which will deeply affect the way the peer review function is carried out and the overall role of journals in assuring quality and adding value to manuscripts.
Several initiatives are promoting the generalized adoption of open access preprints as a formal beginning stage of research publication, which has been common since the 90’s in the physics community. And, in the last decade, new ways to carry out the evaluation of manuscripts have emerged either to replace or to improve the traditional methods, which are widely criticized as being slow and expensive in addition to lacking transparency.
Quality nonprofit journals from emerging and developing countries have succeeded to follow the main innovations brought by the Internet. In addition to the technicalities of the digital publishing, there is a wide adoption of Open Access in the international flow of scientific information. The new wave of innovations that affect the peer review function and the changing role of journals pose new challenges to the emerging and developing countries in regard of scientific publishing. The adoption of these innovations is essential for progress of SciELO as a leading open access program to enhance scientific communication.
The scope of this workshop aims at an in-depth analysis and discussion of the state of art and main trends of the peer review function, the modalities of carrying it out as well as of the increasing adoption of mechanisms to speed publication such as preprints and how they affect and potentially renew the role of journals. These recommendations will guide SciELO policies on manuscript evaluation and on the adoption of preprint publications.
Presentation slides on Open Science and research reproducibility. Presented by Gareth Knight (LSHTM Research Data Manager) on 18th September 2018, as part of an Open Science event for LSHTM Week 2018.
Academic Social Networks and Researcher RankingAmanyalsayed
Open science and web scholarly communication
Using Web 2.0 to increase researcher’s ranking
Academic Social Networks (types, services)
Question & Answer service
Sharing your research output through ASN
Researcher measurement (h-index, RG score)
ASN and researchers’ concerns
Open Research comprises open access to the broad range of research outputs, from journal articles and the underlying data to protocols, results (including negative results), software and tools. Open Research increases inclusivity and collaboration, improves transparency and reproducibility of research and underpins research integrity.
This workshop focuses on the benefits of practicing open research for you as a researcher, to improve discoverability and maximise access to your work and to raise your professional profile.
By the end of the session you will:
• Have an understanding of the principles of Open Research
• Understand open licences and how they apply to publications, data and software
• Be able to apply key tools and techniques to increase the visibility of yourself and your research, including repositories, ORCID, social media and altmetrics
• Describe the different ways of making research and data available open access
Michael Markie talks about open reserch publishing platforms | OSFair2017 Workshop
Workshop title: Open Access Models & Platforms
Workshop overview:
What are the emerging models of Open Access for publications? Who should be involved? How are costs distributed over the stakeholders involved? How can OA platforms innovate further to embrace Open Science? This workshop will discuss and showcase the range of models available, including their costs and organisational aspects, to discuss their relative strengths and weaknesses in different academic contexts.
When: DAY 1 - PARALLEL SESSION 1 & 2
This document discusses open science practices and values. It begins by defining key aspects of open science like transparency, open peer review, and interoperability. It then shares aspirations of researchers and users for open science tools, such as tools that allow fair comparisons across fields and ways to make research more accessible to non-experts. Finally, it outlines several drivers of open science going forward, such as incentives for open practices, overcoming stigma around open access journals, balancing sentiments in open peer review, and moving beyond just publications to recognize other contributions like data deposition.
Sbm open science committee report to the boardBradford Hesse
In the spirit of transparency, I am uploading a mid-course presentation I made to the Board of Directors for the Society of Behavioral Medicine on the topic of Open Science. The report embodies the best thinking of some of the greatest thinkers in our field.
This presentation was provided by Holly Falk-Krzesinski of Elsevier during the NISO event, "Is This Still Working? Incentives to Publish, Metrics, and New Reward Systems," held on February 20, 2019.
The New Dimensions in Scholcomm: How a global scholarly community collaborati...NASIG
Digital Science and 100+ global research institutions have spent the better part of the last two years collaborating to solve three distinct challenges in the existing research landscape:
* Research evaluation focuses almost exclusively on publications and citations data
* Research evaluation tools are siloed in proprietary applications that rarely speak to each other
* The gaps amongst proprietary data sources made generating a complete picture of impact extremely difficult (and expensive)
The goal of this collaboration amongst publishers, funders, research administrators, libraries, and Digital Science was to transform the research landscape by attempting to solve the problems resulting from expensive, siloed data research evaluation data.
4.16.15 Slides, “Enhancing Early Career Researcher Profiles: VIVO & ORCID Int...DuraSpace
Hot Topics: The DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
Series 11: Integrating ORCID Persistent Identifiers with DSpace, Fedora and VIVO
Webinar 3: “Enhancing Early Career Researcher Profiles: VIVO & ORCID Integration”
April 16, 2015
Curated by Josh Brown, ORCID
Presented by: Simeon Warner, Library Information Systems, Cornell University, Jon Corson-Rikert, Head of Information Technology Services, Cornell University and Kristi Holmes, Director, Galter Health Sciences Library, Northwestern University
This document provides an overview of VIVO, an open-source semantic web application for discovering research and scholarship across disciplines within an institution. It discusses current challenges in research networking and how VIVO addresses them by aggregating institution-wide data using linked open data standards. VIVO harvests information from internal and external sources to create profiles of researchers, projects, and publications. It allows for customization and visualization of research activities and connections. The document also describes the VIVO community and opportunities to get involved through various working groups and events.
Mapping & Curation in OER Impact Research #altcRobert Farrow
Presentation from ALT-C conference, 2014 on the value of mapping and curation as an approach to impact research. The presentation includes some discussion of results from OER Research Hub.
Similar to Bosman-Kramer Changing Research Workflows (20)
This presentation was provided by Racquel Jemison, Ph.D., Christina MacLaughlin, Ph.D., and Paulomi Majumder. Ph.D., all of the American Chemical Society, for the second session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session Two: 'Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers,' was held June 13, 2024.
This presentation was provided by Rebecca Benner, Ph.D., of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, for the second session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session Two: 'Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers,' was held June 13, 2024.
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, during the closing segment of the NISO training series "AI & Prompt Design." Session Eight: Limitations and Potential Solutions, was held on May 23, 2024.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, during the seventh segment of the NISO training series "AI & Prompt Design." Session 7: Open Source Language Models, was held on May 16, 2024.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, during the sixth segment of the NISO training series "AI & Prompt Design." Session Six: Text Classification with LLMs, was held on May 9, 2024.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, during the fifth segment of the NISO training series "AI & Prompt Design." Session Five: Named Entity Recognition with LLMs, was held on May 2, 2024.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, during the fourth segment of the NISO training series "AI & Prompt Design." Session Four: Structured Data and Assistants, was held on April 25, 2024.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, during the third segment of the NISO training series "AI & Prompt Design." Session Three: Beginning Conversations, was held on April 18, 2024.
This presentation was provided by Kaveh Bazargan of River Valley Technologies, during the NISO webinar "Sustainability in Publishing." The event was held April 17, 2024.
This presentation was provided by Dana Compton of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), during the NISO webinar "Sustainability in Publishing." The event was held April 17, 2024.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, during the second segment of the NISO training series "AI & Prompt Design." Session Two: Large Language Models, was held on April 11, 2024.
This presentation was provided by Teresa Hazen of the University of Arizona, Geoff Morse of Northwestern University. and Ken Varnum of the University of Michigan, during the Spring ODI Conformance Statement Workshop for Libraries. This event was held on April 9, 2024
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, during the opening segment of the NISO training series "AI & Prompt Design." Session One: Introduction to Machine Learning, was held on April 4, 2024.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, for the eight and final session of NISO's 2023 Training Series on Text and Data Mining. Session eight, "Building Data Driven Applications" was held on Thursday, December 7, 2023.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, for the seventh session of NISO's 2023 Training Series on Text and Data Mining. Session seven, "Vector Databases and Semantic Searching" was held on Thursday, November 30, 2023.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, for the sixth session of NISO's 2023 Training Series on Text and Data Mining. Session six, "Text Mining Techniques" was held on Thursday, November 16, 2023.
This presentation was provided by William Mattingly of the Smithsonian Institution, for the fifth session of NISO's 2023 Training Series on Text and Data Mining. Session five, "Text Processing for Library Data" was held on Thursday, November 9, 2023.
This presentation was provided by Todd Carpenter, Executive Director, during the NISO webinar on "Strategic Planning." The event was held virtually on November 8, 2023.
More from National Information Standards Organization (NISO) (20)
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UPRAHUL
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Bosman-Kramer Changing Research Workflows
1. (except logo’s)
Changing research workflows
Driving forces for openness, efficiency and reproducibility
Bianca Kramer & Jeroen Bosman
ICSTI-NISO joint webinar, October 26, 2016
@MsPhelps
@jeroenbosman
2. Simple or complicated?
A model of the research workflow
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery
Rounds of grant writing
and application
Iterations of
search and reading
Drafting, receiving
comments,rewriting
Submit, peer review,
rejection, resubmitting
Rounds of experiments
and measurements
22. Three goals for science & scholarship (G-E-O)
• declaring competing interests
• replication & reproducibility
• meaningful assessment
• effective quality checks
• credit where it is due
• no fraud, plagiarism
• connected tools & platforms
• no publ. size restrictions
• null result publishing
• speed of publication
• (web)standards, IDs
• semantic discovery
• re-useability
• versioning
open peer review •
open (lab)notes •
plain language •
open drafting •
open access •
CC-0/BY •
good
efficient open
technical
changes &
standards
research
governance
changes
economic
& copyright
changes
researcher
funder
publisher
public
government library
23. Three goals for science & scholarship (G-E-O)
good
efficient open
researcher
funder
publisher
public
government library
25. Inform Support Advise, advocate (Co-)shape policies
e.g.:
Info on website,
in LibGuides, etc.
Offer training, Q&A
What’s a good choice,
why, what’s important
Think with institution,
graduate schools, etc.
asks
for:
Knowledge,
organizing info
Communication skills,
expertise
Advocating priorities,
field-specific knowledge;
a vision
Authority,
role being accepted
Types / levels of research support
26. Constraining and enabling contexts
for open and ‘good’ workflows
political support at (inter)national level •
pressure from funders •
public stance on Open Science by institution •
user-friendly and powerful tools •
interoperability •
role models •
attention for positive effects •
• assessment criteria
• institutional policies/culture
• PI demands
• learning curves
• agreements with collaborators
• uncertainty over effects & legitimacy
27. “Openness and Outreach!
Together with an efficient workflow and
minimal costs for researchers.
Impact should be shared with and created by the
public. That is only possible with Open Science.”