There are currently approximately 28,000 journals publishing 1.5 million papers annually. Although the majority of new journals are legitimate, the credentials of some are questionable. Such journals and publishers are referred to as 'predatory'. They commonly send spam emails to potential authors, solicit submissions and request payment of article processing charges, but lack academic rigor or credibility.
This presentation provides researchers with
an insight into predatory behaviors and and how they can avoid them.
Predatory publishing is a relatively recent phenomenon that seems to be exploiting some key features of the open access publishing model, sustained by collecting APCs that are far less than those found in legitimate open access journals. This CME aims to introduce to the participants on the phenomenon of predatory journals, why they continue to thrive, characteristics that are suggestive of a predatory journal, and how one can take step to minimize the risk of faling into predatory journal publication
Predatory publishing is a relatively recent phenomenon that seems to be exploiting some key features of the open access publishing model, sustained by collecting APCs that are far less than those found in legitimate open access journals. This CME aims to introduce to the participants on the phenomenon of predatory journals, why they continue to thrive, characteristics that are suggestive of a predatory journal, and how one can take step to minimize the risk of faling into predatory journal publication
Introduction to the peer review workshop for the PhD students of the Wageningen Graduate Schools. The goal is to explain peer review, entice PhD students to take part in the peer review process and give some tips on how to start with peer review.
Presentació realitzada per Ana Marušić en el marc del Seminari sobre la revisió per experts (peer review) que va tenir lloc a la Facultat de Biblioteconomia i Documentació de la UB el 20 de juny de 2011, dins el marc del programa de doctorat “Informació i Documentació en la Societat del Coneixement”. Aquest seminari va ser organitzat conjuntament amb l'EASE (European Association of Science Editors).
There are some common criteria you should consider when choosing a journal to publish in. Once you have a publication strategy in place, choose journals that meet all of your criteria.
5 hours course taught by Nicolás Robinson-García and Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras in June 23-July 3, 2014 in the University of Granada within the exchange program with Al-Faraby Kazakh National University students 'Current problems of modern philology'.
Journal impact measures: the Impact FactorTorres Salinas
The seminar on impact measures will first shed light on the best known and most controversial indicator, namely Garfield’s Journal Impact Factor. Its strengths and weaknesses as well as its correct use will be discussed thoroughly. Moreover the corresponding analytical tool, Clarivate Analytics’s Journal Citation Reports will be demonstrated.
Presented at the european summer school for scientometrics ESSS - July 16th, 2019 - Louvain
Open Access (OA) is a system provide access to knowledge resources with free of cost and other restrictions. This PPT answer to the questions what, why, types, benefits etc. and also describes the creative commons licensing, concept of predatory journals, open access journals, and Sharpa RoMeO.
This presentation is about shortlisting and choosing journals for publishing. It also discusses quality issues, including predatory and hijacked journals. Most appropriate for Social Science students.
Defining the h index and the calculation process. Also the main advantages and limitations besides how to increasing the h index.
Dr. Hassan Najman MUHAMED
hassan.muhamed@uod.ac
The University of Duhok - Kurdistan region of Iraq
Introduction to the peer review workshop for the PhD students of the Wageningen Graduate Schools. The goal is to explain peer review, entice PhD students to take part in the peer review process and give some tips on how to start with peer review.
Presentació realitzada per Ana Marušić en el marc del Seminari sobre la revisió per experts (peer review) que va tenir lloc a la Facultat de Biblioteconomia i Documentació de la UB el 20 de juny de 2011, dins el marc del programa de doctorat “Informació i Documentació en la Societat del Coneixement”. Aquest seminari va ser organitzat conjuntament amb l'EASE (European Association of Science Editors).
There are some common criteria you should consider when choosing a journal to publish in. Once you have a publication strategy in place, choose journals that meet all of your criteria.
5 hours course taught by Nicolás Robinson-García and Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras in June 23-July 3, 2014 in the University of Granada within the exchange program with Al-Faraby Kazakh National University students 'Current problems of modern philology'.
Journal impact measures: the Impact FactorTorres Salinas
The seminar on impact measures will first shed light on the best known and most controversial indicator, namely Garfield’s Journal Impact Factor. Its strengths and weaknesses as well as its correct use will be discussed thoroughly. Moreover the corresponding analytical tool, Clarivate Analytics’s Journal Citation Reports will be demonstrated.
Presented at the european summer school for scientometrics ESSS - July 16th, 2019 - Louvain
Open Access (OA) is a system provide access to knowledge resources with free of cost and other restrictions. This PPT answer to the questions what, why, types, benefits etc. and also describes the creative commons licensing, concept of predatory journals, open access journals, and Sharpa RoMeO.
This presentation is about shortlisting and choosing journals for publishing. It also discusses quality issues, including predatory and hijacked journals. Most appropriate for Social Science students.
Defining the h index and the calculation process. Also the main advantages and limitations besides how to increasing the h index.
Dr. Hassan Najman MUHAMED
hassan.muhamed@uod.ac
The University of Duhok - Kurdistan region of Iraq
Academic writing - publishing in international journals and conferencesNatalia Konstantinova
This presentation provides information about publishing in international journals and conferences. It gives several pieces of advice about where to publish, why to publish and also what the typical structure of the paper is.
Manajemen Pengadaan Obat di Rumah Sakit
Sistem pengadaan obat, Metode pengadaan obat, pendistribusian obat, komponen pengadaan obat, kriteria suplier siklus pengadaan obat
There are currently approximately 28,000 journals publishing 1.5 million papers annually. Although the majority of new journals are legitimate, the credentials of some are questionable. Such journals and publishers are referred to as 'predatory'. They commonly send spam emails to potential authors, solicit submissions and request payment of article processing charges, but lack academic rigour or credibility. This presentation will look at examples of publishers, publications and provide practical tips to identify and avoid predatory publishers.
Workshop de autores realizado em parceria com os editores da Springer Nature, Biblioteca Central e Biblioteca do Biociências da UFRGS, dia 25 de outubro de 2018. Ministrante Christina Eckey.
OA discussion at BILETA 2017, Universidade do Minho, Portugal, focusing on legal journal publication. Co-authored with Catherine Easton and Abhilash Hair
Open access futures in the humanities and social sciences a one day confer...SAGE Publishing
A one day conference held by SAGE and the LSE Public Policy Group to explore the issues of OA within the HSS sector.
A video of the conference to accompany the slides can be found here - http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLg8Hz5Alt2FqQbkdZJmdtS5FIslB5pf6K
This presentation in intended to introduce Open Access (OA); the OA movement; OA advantages for authors, institutions and society; OA business models and publishing in OA; important tools for research and publishing; and other ‘open’ initiatives.
Session 1
How to implement Open Science
Antónia Correia & Pedro Principe, University of Minho
Open Access Publishing
How to implement Open Access and Open Science
What is Open Access and how to provide Open Access
Open Access in Horizon 2020: how to comply with H2020 Open Science requirements
Managing and Sharing Research Data
Open, closed and shared data
Data Management Plans
Open Data in Horizon 2020: how to comply with H2020 Open Science requirements
Jay patel Open Access TIPPA Midwest presentation june 2013Jay Patel
Hello, this is the presentation I was invited to give about Open Access at TIPPA Midwest on June 13, 2013. The focus of the presentation is how open access is changing scholarly publishing.
How can UK academic libraries respond to the current issues in scholarly publ...Stuart Dempster
Trends in publishing and collections development, and some opportunities for UK academic libraries to transform services to meet institutional and user requirements in a fast changing environment.
It appears highly probable that immediate open access publishing
will become the default mode for scholarly publishing – for the
biosciences first, other sectors later. ‘Immediate’ open access
means unfettered publication as soon as a scholarly work is
ready, with no embargo period. The costs of making a scholarly
artefact available can be reduced without sacrificing quality. This
interactive session will sketch the argument for these claims and
will present several value-added services that publishers could
develop to thrive in an open access world.
Publication of rigorously peer-reviewed research articles is at the foundation of scientific progress, but there is more than one approach to funding the production and dissemination of such articles. Open Access journals arose in response to a publishing system with ballooning costs and diminishing access, but soon after, predatory journals arrived on the scene to exploit the system. This talk will give an overview of the current situation in the academic journal publishing ecosystem and discuss ways that readers and researchers can protect themselves from the bad actors in that system.
The Value of the Scholarly-led, Non-profit Business Model to Achieve Open Acc...REDALYC
The Value of the Scholarly-led, Non-profit Business Model to Achieve Open Access and Scholarly Publishing Beyond APC: the AmeliCA’s Cooperative Approach
The value of the scholarly-led, non-profit business model to achieve Open Acc...REDALYC
The value of the scholarly-led, non-profit business model to achieve Open Access and scholarly publishing beyond APC: the AmeliCA's cooperative approach
Open Access Publishing: An Author's PerspectiveLaura Gogia
A brief introduction to open access publishing for potential authors, presented at Virginia Commonwealth University's Open Access Week in November 2013.
Similar to Predatory publishing: what it is and how to avoid it (20)
Open Knowledge and the Benefits for University-based ResearchUQSCADS
This presentation was a part of the 2014 Open Access Week Seminars at The University of Queensland Library. Anna Gerber, Technical Project Manager ITEE eResearch Lab at The University of Queensland, shares her insights into the benefits of open data, open access, open source and open learning in the context of university-based research. Anna highlighted the possibilities for the formation of new collaborations with researchers and policy makers and the innovation that can result from making research more discoverable in an online environment. Anna also introduced the audience to the Open Knowledge Foundation (of which she is an Australian Ambassador), a community initiative that seeks to bring together open knowledge groups from across Australia, in an effort to foster the sharing of data, information and knowledge.
Open Access, Intellectual Property and Conservation ScienceUQSCADS
This presentation was a part of The University of Queensland Library's Open Access Week 2014 program. Professor High Possingham spoke of his efforts to make research discoverable and accessible so that it could inform environmental and conservation policy and the fundamental belief that research that is funded by the people should be accessible by the people. As a researcher, policy maker, author of journal articles and monographs, journal editor, reviewer, and software developer, Professor Possingham was able to share his insight into the various ways he has shared his research with colleagues, governments and the general public.
In which journal should I publish my paper? What is an impact factor? How can I promote my research? Can I publish my thesis? What is peer review? This presentation provides an insight into publishing for the Research Higher Degree student or any undergraduate student who wants to publish their research.
Open Access and PLOS: The Future of Scholarly Publishing - Dr. Virginia BarbourUQSCADS
In this presentation, Dr. Barbour discussed the emergence of open access from traditional publishing models, the current open access landscape where PLoS journals have foreshadowed the development of megajournals as well as predicting future developments.
In defining the Open Access Publishing model, Dr. Barbour emphasized the crucial role creative commons licences play in ensuring that research is not only available free to view online, but is able to be re-used.
Dr Alma Swan, "Is Open Acess just another fad?"UQSCADS
Inaugural UQ Open Access Eminent Speaker Forum
Dr Alma Swan, Director of European Advocacy, SPARC
"Is Open Access just another fad?"
Wednesday 30 October 2013
UQ Library, Scholarly Publishing and Digitisation Service (SPaDS) presentation for higher degree students on tips and resources available from the UQ Library and based on academic interviews, to help with getting published in journals.
Going for Gold and Greener Pastures: Open Access Explained
Presentation by Lisa Kruesi, Helen Morgan and Andrew Heath from The University of Queensland Scholarly Publishing and Digititisation Service for Open Access Week, October 2012.
Going for Gold and Greener Pastures: Open Access Explained
Presentation by Lisa Kruesi, Helen Morgan and Andrew Heath from The University of Queensland Scholarly Publishing and Digititisation Service for Open Access Week, October 2012.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Predatory publishing: what it is and how to avoid it
1. Scholarly Publishing
Predatory Publishing: what is it
and how to avoid it.
October 2015
UQ Library Scholarly Communication and Digitisation Services
CC Image courtesy of : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AGeorgia_Aquarium_-_Giant_Grouper
2. Scholarly Publishing
Overview
• Context: changes in scholarly communication
• Predatory publishing: why, what, and how
• Identifying the predators – avoiding the
pitfalls
• Tools for finding reputable journals
3. Scholarly Publishing
Game
Changer
Context: changes in scholarly publishing
eJournals
Open Access Repositories
Hyperlinked references
Citation tracking
Scholarly Blogs
Twitter
Social Media
Open Access
https://101innovations.wordpress.com/about-1/
4. Scholarly Publishing
Rise of Open Access
Open Access is the free, immediate, online
availability of research articles, coupled with the
rights to use these articles fully in the digital
environment (SPARC)
More access means more potential for impact
Not just those
with a UQ Login!
5. Scholarly Publishing
Context: Publish or perish
Why publish?
• Disseminate new
knowledge
• Increase the impact and
visibility of your research
• Establish/build your
reputation
• Be visible or vanish!
30 – 60%
Rejection rate
7. Scholarly Publishing
• Sends spam invitations to students and academics
• Editorial Board either non-existent or same person is
named as Editor of multiple journals
• Name of the journal does not reflect its origin (or does
not reveal its location)
• Name of journal is VERY broad (to attract more content)
• Grammatical errors on website
How to spot a predator:
Questionable practices of predatory journals
8. Scholarly Publishing
Questionable practices of predatory journals
• Publishes pseudo-science articles
• Launches with fleet of empty journals
• No value-add services such as reference linking
• Not indexed by genuine indexes such as Scopus or Web
of Science
• Misleading information about having an ‘impact factor’
9. Scholarly Publishing
Examples of scam emails
This is from Frontiers of Engineering Mechanics Research (FEMR).
It is a great honor writing to you.
We found a paper you published. It’s an excellent paper which is well matched with the
Focus & Scope of FEMR. Title: Erratum: Theory of thin-film, narrowband, linear-
polarization rejection filters with superlattice structure (Optics Communications (2006)
268:1 (182-188) DOI:10.1016/j.optcom.2006.07.006)
To promote the communications in the area of engineering mechanics, we are now
sending our earnest invitation for you to submit new paper to FEMR. If you are
interested in it, please submit your paper online, Website:
http://www.academicpub.org/femr/SubmissionGuidelines.aspx
If you are interested in being our reviewer, please send us your CV (including your title,
affiliation, department, research interests, qualification, email, etc.).
We appreciate the cooperation with you and look forward you hearing from you in the
near future.
Sorry for any inconvenience caused.
Best regards,
12. Scholarly Publishing
Editorial board for each of its 36 journals is : “Chief Editor,
Council for Innovative Research http://www.cirworld.com,
United States.”
14. Scholarly Publishing
Impact upon the Researcher
• Longer term reputation sacrificed for immediate gains – no
academic gain (no/poor quality peer review or academic
rigor)
• Permanent ? on your academic reputation
• Even if your research is sound, it will likely be disregarded by
the academic community if published in a predatory journal
• Waste of your research funding – may be held accountable by
your funding agency
Authors want their work to be read and cited - publish in
journals that you know authors in your discipline are
reading!
15. Scholarly Publishing
How to catch a predator and avoid
publishing pitfalls
Learn to identify
and evaluate and
select suitable
publishing outlets
http://guides.library.uq.edu.au/getting-published
16. Scholarly Publishing
Where to publish: journal evaluation.
Identify list of peer-reviewed journal titles Ulrich's
Access
How will you
make your
publication
available open
access?
UQ Open
Access Policy
Impact/prestige
• Journal impact factors
• Predatory Publishers
Aims/scope
• Discipline area
• Publishes
work you cite
• Audience
Likelihood of acceptance for ECRs.
READ journal publishing guidelines
17. Scholarly Publishing
Useful tools for journal evaluation
• Jeffrey Beall’s List and blog
• Characteristics of a predatory publisher
• Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
• Ulrich’s Database of Journals – indicates peer review
(Ulrichsweb)
• Journal Citation Reports (JCRweb) - impact factors. Search
in Database Gateway
• UQ Client Services Librarian
• UQ Library Scholarly Publishing Service:
s.bunce@library.uq.edu.au
18. Scholarly Publishing
Book publishing - Theses
• “ LAP Lambert’s real plan
finally became clear: They
make money not by selling
arcane tomes to readers, but
by selling the books back to
their authors after they’ve
already signed away the
rights.”
http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2014/03/lap_lambert_ac
ademic_publishing_my_trip_to_a_print_content_farm.html
19. Scholarly Publishing
Publishing a scholarly monograph
• In some disciplines, the scholarly monograph is a
common format for publishing research findings
• Academics in these disciplines can also fall prey to
‘vanity presses’ masquerading as reputable academic
book publishers.
• A list of ‘Print-on-demand publishers’, self-publishing
”Vanity presses” and other non-traditional publishers
has been compiled.
• This guide to Vanity/Subsidy publishers includes a
useful list of ‘warning signs’ .
20. Scholarly Publishing
Before submitting a manuscript
Ask yourself
• Is this a journal you read?
• Is your supervisor familiar with this journal?
• Is it indexed by Scopus or Web of Science?
• Is the journal or publisher named on the
‘Predatory Publisher List’?
http://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/
21. Scholarly Publishing
Supporting OA at UQ – consider ‘green’
UQ eSpace
UQ’s official digital
space for:
• the research
outputs
• the research
data
of staff and students of
The University of
Queensland
Post-print
22. Scholarly Publishing
References: Crawford, W (2011). ALA Editions Special Reports : Open Access: What you need to know now. Chicago, Il. American
Library Association Editions.
Editor's Notes
Good morning, my name is Sharon Bunce and I work in the Scholarly Publishing Unit in the Scholarly Communication and Digitiusation Service in UQ Library.We provide support for UQ researchers and RHD students
In open access, data management, research metrics and in publishing. Today we are going to focus upon an issue that whilst it is not new, has certainly gained momentum and become far more prevalant in recent times – the issue of predatory publishing. I will begin by providing some context around the issue ….how the changes in academic publishing have created an environemtn where these types of publishers have been able to dwevelop. We will then look at the why, what and how and concentrate on how you can avoid being the pray – and why you need to avoid it. Finally we will look at the resouces available to assist you with your publishing decisions so that you can make informed choices about where you publish that enhance your research profile, rather than tarnish it.
Until the mid 1960s, the majority of scholarly communication took place through journals published by Universities, Societies or Associations on behalf of their members, and containing content mostly written by their members. There then came the rapid growth of commercial publishers, who launched their own journals, realising that there was a market for interdisciplinary and inter-country research. In the 1990s journals were one of the early adopters of the Internet and eagerly encouraged digital dissemination, hence the creation of electronic formats (in adition to, or in many cases rather than print formats). The internet has been a game changer. It offers the possibility of creating totally new forms of scholarly communication. Individual articles are discoverable via search engines. Better bibliometric tools reduce reliance on journal impact factors in evaluation. Which, in theory, should give authors more choice in terms of where to publish.
Developments since that time, largely the proliferation of the internet have foreshadowed?? the open availablilty of research through repositories, blogs, social media, and the ability to track citations and altmetrics. Along with these developments is the everpresent requirement to publish – to
Until the mid 1960s, the majority of scholarly communication took place through journals published by Universities, Societies or Associations on behalf of their members, and containing content mostly written by their members. There then came the rapid growth of commercial publishers, who launched their own journals, realising that there was a market for interdisciplinary and inter-country research. In the 1990s journals were one of the early adopters of the Internet and eagerly encouraged digital dissemination, hence the creation of electronic formats (in adition to, or in many cases rather than print formats). The internet has been a game changer. It offers the possibility of creating totally new forms of scholarly communication. Individual articles are discoverable via search engines. Better bibliometric tools reduce reliance on journal impact factors in evaluation. Which, in theory, should give authors more choice in terms of where to publish.
Developments since that time, largely the proliferation of the internet have foreshadowed?? the open availablilty of research through repositories, blogs, social media, and the ability to track citations and altmetrics. Along with these developments is the everpresent requirement to publish – to
eJournals, Open access repositories, citation tracking, altmetrics, scholarly blogs, twitter. Consequently over 90 research funding bodies now have policies requiring grant recipients to provide an open access copy of any article arising from their grant. SO researchers are regularly faced with meeting these requirements, whilst publishing in a journal that suits their article.
This includes the ARC and NHMRC in Australia.
I want to briefly mention the rise of open access here. When we talk about oa dn scholalry communications, we mean scholarly outputs where the full-text is available free of charge, for anyone with an internet connection. Free to view, free to download and depending on the licence attached to the article, re-use with attribution. Open Access has certainly been another “game changer” in scholarly publishing and greater access to research translates into potential for greater citations and subsequent growth in research your research profile. However, it is relevant in a discussion about predatory publishers as whilst both oa and “traditional” publishers have engaged in questionalble practices, the growth of the oa publishing model where authors pay a fee for oa publication, does provide an opportunity for predatory behaviour.
Consequently over 90 research funding bodies now have policies requiring grant recipients to provide an open access copy of any article arising from their grant. SO researchers are regularly faced with meeting these requirements, whilst publishing in a journal that suits their article. Towards the end of the presentation, I will touch upon an alternative way to meet funding oa requiremetns, make your publication avaialble openly and publish in a journal of your choice.
Consequently, over 90 research funding bodies now have policies requiring grant recipients to provide an open access copy of any article arising from their grant.
This includes the ARC and NHMRC in Australia.
The final piece of the context puzzle around scholarly publishing is the role that publication pays in building your reputation or your research profile. All researchers and ECRs particularly are also
Faced with high rates of rejection when submitting articles and are understandably looking for a journal that will take their work.
Unfortunately, a number of disreputable entrepreneurs see the Gold OA model as an opportunity to enter the extremely lucrative academic journal publishing industry.
They are taking advantage of the large numbers of researchers who need publications on their CV to start or advance their career and are having difficulty getting past the robust peer review processes of established journals (OA or subscription-based).
These so called predatory publishers have set up new journals which purport to be ‘peer reviewed’ but generally are not. Any article submitted, no matter how flawed, will be published provided the author is willing to pay. In many cases, the authors know that the peer review is not genuine and pay willingly to get their publication numbers up. Generally, these authors are from developing countries where evaluation is still based on number of publications rather than citations.
However, these journals have trapped researchers who were NOT aware that they had fallen prey to a publishing scam until it was too late.
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) is cleaning house: deleting all entries from its list and “asking all of the journals in its directory to reapply on the basis of stricter criteria.” This development seems clearly to come as the result of growing concern about “predatory” journals—publications that present themselves to potential authors as rigorous and high-quality scholarly open access (OA) journals but actually do little more than collect processing fees up front and then publish whatever is submitted, often without any peer review or even meaningful editorial oversight. Because there is great worldwide demand for the opportunity to place articles in peer-reviewed journals, and because setting up a fake “journal” is both cheap and relatively simple, the appearance and growth of such scams are hardly surprising.
Sample Beall Engineering Journal (Frontiers of Engineering Mechanics Research) email: You’ll note also that the email uses flowery language and has grammatical mistakes. I hear frequently that researchers are tired of receiving spam from publishers. Spamming researchers by praising their errata is dumb. I think the fact that World Academic Publishing can’t even spam properly is a good indicator of how poor a publisher it is.
This is the home page for a journal included on Jeffrey Beall’s list of stand-alone ‘predatory’ journals.
Notice the poor grammar
The Science ‘update’ infer these are articles are published in this journal (they are not). In fact no references are given for the updates – which is a big red flag. Also the science update listed here was still being used as a ‘new science update’ 9 months later!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Notice that the indexing is by unknown tools.
The link to ‘publish video article’ is broken
This one has the same ‘editorial board’ for each of its 36 journals. No named individuals. They have include ‘United States’ to make it sound authoritative (and attract naïve researchers in developing countries).
Last year, an article by staff journalist, John Bohannon, from the journal Science described a sting operation in which variants of a fake scholarly paper were submitted to 304 ‘suspect’ open access journals to test the rigour of their reviewing processes.
Bohannon wrote the paper under the fake name of 'Ocorrafoo Cobange' supposedly a biologist at the Wassess Institute of Medicine in Asmara, which does not exist.
The papers were carefully crafted to be superficially credible but contained major flaws which competent reviewers should have been able to spot.
157 of the journals (52 per cent) accepted the paper for publication; in many cases without any evidence that the paper had actually been read by anyone.
Longer term reputation and career prospects sacrificed for immediate gains – no academic gain (no peer review or academic rigor)
Permanent stain (/) on your academic reputation
Even if your research is sound, it will likely be disregarded by the academic community if published in a predatory journal
Waste of your research funding – may be held accountable by your funding agency
Learn to identify/evaluate and select suitable publishing outlets – include a link to choosing a journal on SP libguide
DOAJ is an online directory that indexes and provides access to quality open access, peer-reviewed journals.
Excerpt:
“The contract told me—as I’d already learned from the blog posts—that I’d transfer the exclusive right to print my thesis to AV Akademikerverlag GmbH & Co. KG, the German company that owned LAP Lambert. (I could still let people download the thesis digitally, if I wasn’t making a profit.) They’d pay for all publishing costs, and I’d get 12 percent of the book’s royalties, but only if they cleared 50 euros per month for a calendar year—otherwise, I’d just get credit to use in buying other LAP Lambert books.
Over the next two weeks, I got three more emails from Holmes pressuring me to buy, each more aggressive than the last. She used several strategies: guilt (“We agreed to provide you free ISBN, free cataloguing of your book in thousands of bookstores, free book cover, market coverage, support and assistance.
We are now offering you the opportunity to support your project.”); optimism (“You can also purchase some copies and market them in your locality or maybe even sell them at your own price, thus not only generating profit, but also getting to know your target audience and perhaps establishing valuable contacts.”); and finally, hostility (“We would have thought that you would have at least liked to have some copies of your new published book and that is why proposed this offer to you in the first place.
For kicks, I’d buried an errant phrase deep in the middle, partly to see if LAP Lambert’s editors ever actually read the thing. When I got to Page 86, I was gratified to find that they hadn’t noticed it. Right there on the middle of the page, amid talk of Oglala Lakota politics and tribal sovereignty was my insertion.
“Is any proofreader actually reading this book before it gets printed?” I’d asked. “Didn’t think so.”
Note: ‘books’ published by VDM or Lap Lambert are not accepted as publications for HERDC or ERA.